March 8, 2018
International Women's Day 2018
All Out to Fight for Empowerment on
International Women's Day!
Interviews
with
Working
Women
• Nathalie Soullière, Construction
Worker and Member of Electrical
Workers' Union
• Magali Giroux, Member of
Montreal Local of Canadian Union of Postal Workers
• Nathalie Savard, President, Union of
Health Care Workers in
Northeastern Quebec
• Manon Castonguay, President, USW Local 6486,
CEZinc Refinery in
Salaberry-de-Valleyfield
For Your Information
• History of International
Women's Day - Janice Murray
Nova Scotia Liberals
Hand Over Decision-Making in Education to
Private Interests
• Nova Scotians Speak Up - Kevin
Corkill
Ontario Education
Unions' Annual General Meetings
• Teachers and Education Workers Must Speak in
Their Own
Name - Laura Chesnik
• Anti-Social Aims Behind Program to
Eliminate Local
Decision-Making -
Enver
Villamizar
University
Workers
Affirm
Their
Right
to
Say
No!
• York University Academic Workers on Strike
• Carleton Workers Say No! to Attacks on
Defined Benefit Pensions
Interviews with Working Women
Nathalie Soullière, Construction Worker and
Member of Electrical Workers' Union
I am an electrician and a
member of the electrical workers' union (FIPOE). I also have my
welder's cards. I am a member of the FIPOE's Women's Committee that
meets a few times a year to discuss various issues, mostly those faced
by women. Our job is to provide resources and make them aware of the
resources that exist to help them. Some women have difficulty getting
accepted into their workplace. There are employers who do not want
them. The committee did a survey of women workers to find out their
expectations for the committee. Many told us they can't get work, that
not all employers are interested in hiring a women. Either they are not
hired, or are not called back. In the construction industry, when the
job is finished, it's "bye-bye, go home."
A major problem, and it's not just a problem for women,
is work-family balance. It is not easy for women who are single parents
and for men who are in the same situation, with the hours we do. For
example, tomorrow morning I start working at 6:30 am in Montreal and I
live 45 minutes from my place of work. There is no daycare open at this
time. I'm fine because my daughters are old enough to be independent,
but for single parents with preschool children, that's a big problem.
The construction industry is not always well-suited to these conditions.
I think we need to continue to increase the number of women in
construction, but we have to make sure they have the training and the
knowledge they require.
Magali Giroux, Member of Montreal Local of
Canadian Union of Postal Workers
March 8 is an important and relevant day because
it's a time to remember. Yes, we have come far and there are women who
have really struggled, but there is still a long way to go. There is
still a big wage and social gap.
If we look at the postal sector, it is still mostly men
who are mail carriers, even though things are changing. A pay equity
fight is currently being waged today, in 2018! Rural and suburban
mail carriers, a predominantly female group, earn 30 per cent less
than
urban mail carriers, who are mostly men. We still have a problem. We
have
a problem in our union bodies, which are mostly men. There are family
constraints -- we have children, a family. We still carry a heavy load,
the mental load, the school meetings, family health, the purchase of
clothes -- winter, summer, autumn; dentist and doctor's
appointments, etc.
There are efforts in the union to facilitate women's
participation. Training is done on weekends to make it more accessible.
Women can come with their children -- daycare is provided by the union,
or they pay for childcare. These are gains. At meetings, children are
welcome. When we see that women want to get involved, we can help and
encourage them and help them navigate it.
Nathalie Savard, President, Union of
Health Care Workers in Northeastern Quebec
The majority of our members, 90 per cent, who are
nurses, nursing assistants and respiratory therapists, are women. With
what we are currently facing in the health care sector our conditions
are not easy, sick days, overtime, the difficulties of balancing
work, family and studies, so celebrating March 8 has meaning. We
have women who fought before us for women's rights. As women we have a
fight to wage in terms of our working conditions, at the level of
public services, and with all that is happening with the denunciation
of
abuses, March 8 this year takes on an even wider meaning.
We are seeing things such as the denunciation of sexual
abuse, the reporting of abuses in our working conditions and we have to
be there and fight as much as needed. We must defend our living and
working conditions and be present in society, especially for the
defence of living conditions in the regions. When we talk about the
women we represent, it is inspiring to see how they care for their
families, how they care for the health of patients in our regions, how
they care that they should have access to good services near where they
live. We are also active with community organizations so that women's
associations, for example, continue to have the necessary budgets to do
their work with people in difficulty.
As far as we are concerned, what makes our people sick
is the organization of work, the overtime, the deficiency of the
organization of work -- all these changes that have been made by a
Minister in his office alone, without any knowledge of the
reality facing the people on the ground. In the face of these problems
disciplinary
measures do not solve anything.
We have people who wore black shirts and put their
employee number on the back in protest. There was nothing else written
on the shirt. The employer advised them that the patients were afraid
of their shirts. They wanted to discipline them. We have people in
James Bay who have had their job titles removed and were given another
title to
save money in the budget. They are asked to do the same tasks for less
pay. When they refuse, saying that it no longer part of their job, they
have meetings with the employer for insubordination and disciplinary
action is taken against them. It is a reign of terror. It just
aggravates the problems.
All this is being raised this year on March 8.
Manon Castonguay, President, USW Local 6486, CEZinc
Refinery in Salaberry-de-Valleyfield
Striking CEZinc workers rally outside company shareholders meeting in
Toronto,
April 28, 2017.
My message on the occasion of March 8, is that
anything is possible. There is no barrier that women cannot cross. As
far as I'm concerned, I started working at the refinery in 1997
and was the first woman to work there. Now there are 18 women out
of a total of 368 workers. I am also the first woman president of
the local. It is important to open doors for women in non-traditional
occupations. These are jobs that are often well paid. There is talk of
achieving women's financial independence, but often single mothers
are forced to work two or three jobs to support their families. If
they work in a non-traditional environment, often they will be able
to achieve the same goal with one job. I find very sad the situation of
single mothers who do not have financial independence, who face a
battle every month to get food on the table and pay the rent. Often the
jobs are precarious, part-time jobs. Women end up with 20 hours a
week and they do not know their work schedule in
advance. This should not happen in this day and age. Women must have a
job that meets their needs because that is what they deserve.
For Your Information
History of International Women's Day
- Janice Murray -
Historic site in Copenhagen, Denmark where women from around the world
gathered for the Second International Conference of Socialist Women in
1910 and passed the resolution
establishing International Women's Day.
In 1910, a resolution was passed by the Second
International
Conference of Socialist Women, held in Copenhagen, Denmark,
establishing International Women's Day. The resolution was unanimously
adopted by the more than 100 women delegates from 17
countries
attending, among whom were the first three women
elected to the Finnish parliament. The resolution was put forward by
German communist Clara Zetkin who had first proposed the idea of an
annual demonstration in support of working women and women's rights at
the First International Conference of Socialist Women held in
Stuttgart, Germany in 1907.
This Second International Conference reiterated the
principles
adopted at the First International Conference of Socialist Women on the
question of women's suffrage. These principles established the
framework for the resolution to establish an International Women's Day
that focused on the question of women's political rights.
The document states in part:
German communist Clara Zetkin (1857-1933), initially proposed
International Women's Day in 1910. She was active in the Social
Democratic Party of Germany until 1916, when she co-founded the
Spartacus League of the Independent Social Democratic Party of
Germany. In 1919 she joined the Communist Party of Germany, which she
represented in
the Reichstag from 1920-1933.
|
"The socialist woman's movement of all countries
repudiates the
limited Woman's Suffrage as a falsification of and insult to the
principle of the political equality of the female sex. It fights for
the only living concrete expression of this principle: the universal
woman's suffrage which is open to all adults and bound by no conditions
of
property, payment of taxes, or degrees of education or any other
qualifications, which exclude members of the working class from the
enjoyment of the right. They carry on their struggle not in alliance
with the bourgeois Women's Righters, but in alliance with the Socialist
Parties, and these fight for Woman's Suffrage as one of the demands
which from the point of view of principle and practice is most
important for the democratization of the suffrage."
Stating that the socialist parties in all countries are
"bound to
fight with energy for the introduction of Woman's Suffrage" it says
that the socialist women's movement must take part in the struggles
organized by the socialist parties for the democratization of the
suffrage, while at the same time ensuring that within this fight the
"question of
the Universal Woman Suffrage is insisted upon with due regard to its
importance of principle and practice."
The resolution to establish International Women's Day
states,
"In order to forward political enfranchisement of women
it is the
duty of the Socialist women of all countries to agitate according to
the above-named principles indefatigably among the labouring masses;
enlighten them by discourses and literature about the social necessity
and importance of the political emancipation of the female sex and use
therefore every opportunity of doing so. For that propaganda they have
to make the most especially of elections to all sorts of political and
public bodies."
The delegates resolved,
"In agreement with the class-conscious political and
trade
organizations of the proletariat in their country the socialist women
of all nationalities have to organize a special Woman's Day, which in
first line has to promote Women Suffrage propaganda. This demand must
be discussed in connection with the whole women's question according to
the socialist conception of social things."
A "Woman's Day" had been organized the previous year in
the United
States, on the last Sunday in February 1909, by the National
Women's
Committee of the American Socialist Party, marked by demonstrations for
women's rights. Women's suffrage along with the rights of women
workers, particularly in the garment trade, were the
focus of these demonstrations. This Woman's Day honoured the thousands
of women involved in the numerous labour strikes in the first years of
the twentieth century in many cities, including Montreal, Chicago,
Philadelphia and New York. This was a period when women entered the
labour force in their thousands and alongside working men
fought to organize collectively and to improve their brutal conditions
of work.
Later in 1909, needle-trade workers in New York
City -- 80 per cent
of whom were women -- walked off their jobs and marched and rallied for
union rights, decent wages and working conditions in the "Uprising
of 20,000." The work stoppage was reportedly referred to as the
"women's movement strike" and continued
from November 22, 1909 to February 15, 1910. The
Women's Trade Union
League provided bail money for arrested strikers and large sums for
strike funds during the work stoppage.
Early Celebrations of International Women's Day
March 19, 1911 was the date set for the first
International
Women's Day by the Second International Conference of Socialist Women
and, implementing their resolution, rallies held in Austria, Denmark,
Germany and Switzerland on that day were attended by more than one
million women and men. "The vote for women will
unite our strength in the struggle for socialism" was the call of these
rallies. In addition to their demand for the right to elect and be
elected, they demanded the right to work, to vocational training and to
an end to discrimination on the job. A woman socialist wrote at that
time:
"The first International Women's Day took place
in 1911. Its
success exceeded all expectation. Germany and Austria on Working
Women's Day was one seething, trembling sea of women. Meetings were
organized everywhere -- in the small towns and even in the villages
halls were packed so full that they had to ask male workers to
give up their places for the women.
"This was certainly the first show of militancy by the
working
woman. Men stayed at home with their children for a change, and their
wives, the captive housewives, went to meetings. During the largest
street demonstrations, in which 30,000 were taking part, the
police
decided to remove the demonstrators' banners: the women workers
made a stand. In the scuffle that followed, bloodshed was averted only
with the help of the socialist deputies in Parliament."
The following year, women in France, the Netherlands
and Sweden
joined in actions marking International Women's Day. In the period
leading up to the declaration of World War I, the celebration of
International Women's Day opposed imperialist war and expressed
solidarity between working women of different lands in opposition to
the
national chauvinist hysteria of the ruling circles. For example, in
Europe International Women's Day was an occasion when speakers from one
country would be sent to another to deliver greetings.
Russian women observed their first International
Women's Day on the
last Sunday in February 1913 (on the Julian calendar, which
corresponded to March 8 on the Gregorian calendar in use
elsewhere),
under conditions of brutal Tsarist reaction. There was no possibility
of women organizing open demonstrations but, led by
communist women, they found ways to celebrate the day. Articles on
International Women's Day were published in the two legal workers'
newspapers of the time, including greetings from Clara Zetkin and
others.
An essay written in 1920 by a woman communist
activist at that time described the 1913 celebration:
"In those bleak years meetings were forbidden. But in
Petrograd, at
the Kalashaikovsky Exchange, those women workers who belonged to the
Party organized a public forum on 'The Woman Question.' Entrance was
five kopecks. This was an illegal meeting but the hall was absolutely
packed. Members of the Party spoke. But this animated
'closed' meeting had hardly finished when the police, alarmed at such
proceedings, intervened and arrested many of the speakers.
"It was of great significance for the workers of the
world that the
women of Russia, who lived under Tsarist repression, should join in and
somehow manage to acknowledge with actions International Women's Day.
This was a welcome sign that Russia was waking up and the Tsarist
prisons and gallows were powerless to kill the workers'
spirit of struggle and protest."
Women in Russia continued to celebrate International
Women's Day in
various ways over the ensuing years. Many involved in organizing landed
themselves in Tsarist prisons as the slogan "for the working women's
vote" had become an open call for the overthrow of the Tsarist
autocracy.
The first issue of "The Woman Worker" (Rabotnitsa), a
journal for
working class women, was published in 1914. That same year, the
Bolshevik Central Committee decided to create a special committee to
organize meetings for International Women's Day. These meetings were
held in the factories and public places to discuss issues
related to women's oppression and to elect representatives from those
who had participated in these discussions and the resulting proposals
to work on the new committee.
International Women's Day 1917 in Russia
In Russia, International Women's Day 1917 was a
time of intense
struggle against the Tsarist regime. Workers, including women workers
in textile and metal working industries, were on strike in the capital
city and opposition to Russia's participation in the imperialist war
raging in Europe was growing. On March 8
(February 23 on the Julian calendar), women in their thousands
poured
onto the streets of St. Petersburg in a strike for bread and peace. The
women factory workers, joined by wives of soldiers and other women,
demanded, "Bread for our children" and "The return of our husbands from
the trenches." This day marked the beginning of the
February Revolution, which led to the abdication of the Tsar and the
establishment of a provisional government.
The provisional government made the franchise
universal, and
recognized equal rights for women. Following the October 1917
Revolution, the Bolshevik government implemented more advanced
legislation, guaranteeing in the workplaces the right of women to
directly participate in social and political activity, eliminating all
formal and
concrete obstacles which previously had meant the subordination of
their social and political activity and their subservience to men. New
legislation on maternity and health insurance was proposed and approved
in December 1917. A public insurance fund was created, with no
deductions from workers wages, that benefited both women
workers and male workers' wives. It meant that women were now treated
second to none as neither they nor their children were dependent on
spouses and fathers for their well-being.
After 1917
March 8 as International Women's Day became
official in 1921
when Bulgarian women attending the International Women's Secretariat of
the Communist International proposed a motion that it be uniformly
celebrated around the world on this day. March 8 was chosen to
honour
the role played by the Russian women in
the revolution in their country, and through their actions, in the
struggle of women for their emancipation internationally.
The first IWD rally in Australia was held in 1928.
It was organized
by the communist women there and demanded an eight hour day, equal pay
for equal work, paid annual leave and a living wage for the unemployed.
Spanish women demonstrated against the fascist forces
of Gen.
Francisco Franco to mark International Women's Day in 1937.
Italian
women marked IWD 1943 with militant protests against fascist
dictator
Benito Mussolini for sending their sons to die in World War II.
In this
way, since 1917, International Women's Day
has been both a day of celebration of women's fight for their
empowerment and a day to militantly affirm the opposition of women to
imperialist war and aggression. Its spirit has always been that to win
the rights of women and the fight for security and peace, women must
put themselves in the front ranks of the fight and of governments which
represent these demands.
Nova Scotia Liberals Hand Over
Decision-Making
in Education to Private Interests
Nova Scotians Speak Up
- Kevin Corkill -
The Nova Scotia Liberal government is using Bill 72, the
Education Reform Act,
to
legalize
turning
education
over
to
private
interests
and
by
doing
so
destroying
existing
arrangements
including
the
right of teachers and
education workers, organized into unions, to negotiate their wages and
conditions of work. The McNeil government is focused on imposing
arbitrariness in decision-making and destroying prior arrangements on
conditions of employment and the role of community members in public
education. The government is pushing these changes without the say or
consent of those directly engaged in education or generally from the
people it purports to govern. Nova Scotians are persisting in speaking
up against this and fighting for their rights and the right of the
polity to public education.
Bill 72 was sent to the Law
Amendments Committee after second reading on March 2. On March 5,
the committee heard interventions from more than 60 people
condemning the bill. Teachers, counsellors, parents and union
representatives of the Nova Scotia Teachers Union (NSTU), Nova Scotia
General and Government Employees Union and the Canadian Union of Public
Employees all said No! to the
bill. They called on the McNeil Liberals to halt their imposition of
this bill to so-call reform the Nova Scotia education system, a bill
which they insist ignores the concerns of all those who work in
education.
Bill 72 imposes numerous recommendations made by
Dr. Avis Glaze, the CEO of Edu-Quest International Inc., a private
education company headquartered in Delta, BC. The McNeil Liberals
commissioned this private enterprise to deliver a report with
instructions to change the structure of the education system in Nova
Scotia. To add
insult to injury, they have consistently ignored, some say snubbed, the
views and proposals of those who work in the Nova Scotia education
system.
One of the main proposals accepted in Bill 72 is
the removal of principals, vice-principals and administrators from the
NSTU, a measure that has nothing to do with improving public education
with increased investments. NSTU President Liette Doucet commented,
"This is punishment, pure and simple, for the strong role that
principals, vice-principals and administrators have played in the NSTU
since its inception, up to and including work-to-rule last year and the
first province-wide strike of the NSTU."
Another important measure is the dissolution of the
elected school boards and their reorganization as "regional education
centres." At first glance this move looks like posturing, making it
appear as if something decisive is being done which is favourable. In
fact power over the education system is being centralized in the hands
of the provincial
cabinet which is an executive power. The move sets precedents in terms
of depriving the teachers and workers of the right to determine their
working conditions and the right of local community members to be a
part of determining the direction of the education system and choosing
those whom they would like to lead.
A most obnoxious aspect of
the proposed legislation is continuous declarations of imposing the
Glaze recommendations, as though they are a gospel from on high.
Minister Zach Churchill could not reiterate his veneration enough while
introducing the legislation at Province House: "As Dr. Glaze told us to
do.... [We will be] achieving goals and objectives Dr. Glaze set out
for us.... Dr. Glaze has challenged us to take a hard look ... and move
forward in a way that is challenging and that is disruptive to the
status quo."
One has to wonder how Dr. Glaze gained so much
influence over the government of Nova Scotia. Does she live in Nova
Scotia, work in Nova Scotia, work in the education system in Nova
Scotia? No, she does not. How is it that this private corporation has
bent the ear of the McNeil Liberals so much so that they are
implementing the CEO's
"recommendations" without regard for the well-known concerns of the
people of Nova Scotia? Good ideas or bad, this government is so set on
imposing the private control of education that it has lost all sense of
shame. It can no longer be entrusted with the duty to the people to
recognize the rights of workers to determine their conditions of work,
the right to collective bargaining and the right of Nova Scotians to
have a say over the education system of their children and youth.
Those involved in education here want to develop it
and make it better. To ignore the need of the polity to lay the claims
which they must is unacceptable. The opposition to Bill 72 is
significant. It expresses the people's defiance which will give them
the experience they need to go further.
It shows those private interests are determined to
enforce their dictate over every conceivable aspect of public policy,
including education, through their grip on the state apparatus in order
to ensure that every social measure taken by the government will
benefit their private gain.
Similarly, the government’s apparent desire for
retribution shows that the private interests that control the state
will never reconcile themselves to any concession won by working people
if it means even the slightest infringement on what they consider to be
their absolute right to plunder the public treasury and ensure the
payment of the public debt. When some advance is made, the private
interests do not concede that the matter has gone beyond their control.
Instead, they resolve to renew the battle to impose their dictate over
state policy at the next available opportunity and thereby restore
their dominance over state fiscal policy so that every measure serves
their maximum benefit.
Criminalizing
workers and unions for upholding rights is a pyrrhic victory. So long
as the workers find ways to resist, it cannot succeed. No government
which rules without the consent of the governed can succeed for long.
Shame on the Liberals! Nova Scotians will continue to speak out!
Kevin Corkill can be
reached through nsworkersforum@yahoo.com.
Annual General Meetings of Provincial
Education Unions in Ontario
Teachers and Education Workers
Must Speak in Their Own Name
- Laura Chesnik -
From March 9-12 the Ontario Secondary School
Teachers' Federation (OSSTF) and the Ontario English Catholic Teachers
Association (OECTA) will each meet for their annual provincial meetings
in Toronto.
Together the two unions
represent
approximately 105,000 teachers and education workers who provide
education in cities, towns and villages across Ontario. OECTA
represents teachers in the English Catholic school boards, while OSSTF
represents teachers and others working in nearly all fields, from
kindergarten to adult education, in
public and Catholic English and French school boards, in addition to
staff at private schools and universities.
On the minds of many delegates is the June 7 Ontario
elections. It is truly absurd that leaders of the three parties in the
legislature have been invited, not to listen to delegates and what they
think, but to speak to delegates in at least one of the meetings. A
feature of the unrepresentative political process is that it reduces
those who know the actual problems and how to resolve them to the role
of spectators, who are supposed to chose a representative to act in
their name. This representative in fact implements a dictate which
comes from private interests but teachers and education workers, and
all members of the polity, get to "listen" and, come the election, they
are "free" to "chose" the one whose party is most convincing at saying
it cares about their concerns.
Each party has defined "the issues" for the electorate
which is supposed to "choose" who to vote for despite having no role in
establishing or coming up with these so-called election issues.
Teachers and education workers, nurses, industrial workers and others
who create all the value of the society through their work are being
told they must
fit their demands into the various "issues" defined by the marketing
firms the parties that make up the cartel party system have hired to
direct their campaigns. If we cannot do that, we are told that our
"issues" are not those which the party can "win" with or that
"stakeholders" -- by which they mean private interests -- have
identified. The framework
of all the parties vying for power is that the platform and various
"issues" they define must fit within the overall neo-liberal austerity
agenda which considers workers as a "cost" and paying the rich as the
aim of the society -- like it or not. This direction is deemed
unassailable.
Teachers and education
workers in Ontario and across
Canada have risen as a mighty force to say No! to attacks on our wages
and working conditions because we know they are also students' learning
conditions.
We cannot accept that day in and day out we identify
problems and what we need to do our job properly -- whether it is the
need for real caps on class sizes, proper staffing levels for students
with special needs, professional mental health and other services --
but have no say or control to implement the changes that are required.
How to deal with these issues is not the problem in the 21st century.
The problem is political -- the working people need to renew the
political process so that decision-making cannot be repeatedly hijacked
by cartel parties and their marketing machines and the private
interests who are dictating what can and cannot take place. Solving
this problem is where we need to focus our energies. No more cap in
hand! No more pleading with governments to do the right thing. We can
speak in our own name!
Laura Chesnik is an
elementary teacher from Windsor,
Ontario.
Anti-Social Aims Behind Program
to Eliminate Local Decision-Making
- Enver Villamizar -
The annual meetings of
OSSTF and OECTA take place
approximately one year after the Ontario government amended the
provincial bargaining legislation it imposed on teachers and education
workers in K-12 education, permitting the extension of existing
provincial agreements in order to eliminate local bargaining. These
extended
collective agreements expire August 31, 2019.
A major aim of the Ontario Liberal government and the
ruling
elite they represent has been to step-by-step eliminate
the say of teachers and education workers as well as other public
sector workers over their wages and working conditions at the local
level, to facilitate the direct imposition of their austerity agenda on
these workers.
Although this came to a head in 2012 with Bill 115, the Putting
Students
First
Act, this direction has not been abandoned by the
ruling elite.
How to affirm the right to decide the direction of the
education system in Ontario is a challenge facing teachers and
education workers. Affirming this right to a say is the condition for
affirming the right of the youth to an education that serves a modern
nation-building project for Canada.
Loss of Local Bargaining
The effective
elimination of meaningful local bargaining has now taken place in two
rounds of K-12 bargaining in the last six years, eliminating the say
of locally elected officials in both the unions and the school boards.
School boards administer the education system and set policy on how
schools run
which significantly affects those who provide education and receive it.
Without local negotiations, the problems which arise as a result of the
overall neo-liberal direction being imposed in education only get worse
and arbitrariness on the part of local school boards becomes more
common.
More Violations of the Right to Strike
In the last round of negotiations between the Ontario
colleges and their faculty which led to a strike, the government gave a
green light to the colleges to refuse to negotiate with faculty by
hinting that it would order faculty back to work if no agreement was
reached. That is what eventually took place with the government
forcing a contract on the faculty by imposing binding arbitration,
eliminating the faculty's right to say No! with strike action. This has
become the latest method by which the government violates the right to
strike after having faced mass resistance to its dictate with
Bill 115.
Anti-Social Aims Continue
The striving of teachers and education workers as well
as elected boards which oversee education at the local level to
exercise decision-making power is seen by the ruling elite as an
impediment to imposing neo-liberal reforms. This was clearly outlined
in the roadmap for reform of public
services commissioned by the Ontario government in 2011. At that
time the
government appointed former TD Banker Don Drummond and an advisory
council to decide how to restructure public services to serve the rich.
The outcome of this was the Drummond Report which amongst many other
changes advised the government to require provincial bargaining in K-12
education in order to exercise greater power over public
spending in education, i.e. workers' wages and working
conditions. In the past, provincial negotiations had been entered into
voluntarily following the Harris government's reforms which included
eliminating the ability of local school boards to raise their own taxes
to fund education.
The elimination of local decision-making seeks to more
efficiently remove funds from public education to pay the private
interests that hold the public debt. This is done through
attacking the wages and working conditions of those who provide public
education, while at the same time reforming what is taught, how it is
taught and
how it is funded to more directly serve the demands of the biggest
global monopolies for a highly skilled workforce to serve their narrow
interests rather than nation-building. In September of 2017 for
example, the Ontario government announced a "modernization" of
Ontario's school system to emphasize "equity" and "transferable
skills,"
about which little else has been said. Those who the government quotes
as supporting this modernization include high-tech cloud computing
giant IBM. It appears as if the review will begin in all earnest
following the provincial election. This "modernization" comes as
Ontario is positioning itself as a hub for high-tech companies. A big
question is
how can the education system be truly "modernized" without the
empowerment of those who provide education to have a say over the
direction of education and the economy as a whole?
The government has also
sought in recent years to place ever larger amounts of money from
workers' pension and benefit funds under its control or sway so they
can be used to fund various pay-the-rich schemes. The Wynne government
has, for example, changed its accounting practices to include the
Ontario Teachers' Pension Fund, the largest public pension fund in
North America, as a government asset despite the government not having
control over the fund. There has not been any serious explanation from
the government as to why it has done this and who it serves. Such
accounting practices have resulted in the Ontario Legislature's Auditor
General indicating that the government's accounts will soon become
unreliable.
As another example, in previous provincial negotiations the Ontario
government negotiated a pooling of all locally administered benefit
funds from school boards across the province into a massive provincial
Employee Life and Health Trust. It is overseen by a board with members
appointed by the various provincial education unions, the government
and the provincial trustees' bodies. Once selected, board members are
deemed to represent the Trust and are required by its rules to operate
within a framework which views members and their wellbeing as a cost
while the Trust's aim being to maximize returns on investments of its
substantial funds. Through this arrangement, although the impression is
that the unions and by extension members "have a say" over the
direction of the Trust, in fact those appointed represent the Trust
rather than the provincial unions, let alone the members. By placing
the Trust partially under its control, the Ontario government also puts
itself in the position of directing how the fund's assets are used and
invested. What plans they have for these funds which are required to
provide benefits to those who provide education has not been discussed
openly.
While local decision-making over workers' wages and
working conditions is being curtailed, local school boards are being
encouraged and in some cases required to privatize the delivery of
publicly-funded education under their jurisdiction to make up for a
lack of investments from the government.
In the name of "internationalizing" Ontario's education
system for example, school boards are becoming very competitive in
recruiting international students through private agencies as a source
of revenue. This now
expands into the K-12 sector the emphasis on international student
recruitment to offset
cuts to education that began under the Harris government and continued
under McGuinty. In addition, more and more emphasis is being placed on
bringing in private companies that provide platforms for delivering
online education as a means to eliminate the human factor in education
and "do more with less" rather than to improve the quality of
education and have technology serve the human factor. Once again this
direction is not being taken by involving those who are to provide the
education in deciding what is required. Instead it is dictated from the
Ontario government and then implemented by school boards.
These reforms result in definite problems in the
education system as more and more decision-making by locally-elected
officials is eliminated and arrangements are made without the
participation and the right to say No!
of those who will be affected by
the decisions and who uphold the best interests of the students. The
consequences of this
direction being imposed in K-12 education are on the minds of delegates
attending the upcoming provincial meetings and are reflected in some of
the motions put forward by local unions especially as concerns the
problems arising from moving to a province wide benefits plan as well
as
the way the government has used provincial bargaining to
override provisions in local collective agreements which upheld higher
standards. There are also concerns being raised about how technology
should be used in education.
These
concerns
reflect
teachers'
and
education
workers'
lack
of
say
over
their
working
conditions
and
underscore
the
importance
for them to
affirm their right to decide their wages and working conditions as they
are students' learning conditions.
Strikes at Ontario Universities
York University Academic Workers on Strike
Rally at York University, March 5, 2018.
On March 5, teaching assistants, graduate
assistants and part-time faculty at York University, members of
Local 3903 of the Canadian Union of Public Employees
(CUPE), began strike action after overwhelmingly rejecting
York University's final offer.
CUPE 3903 represents
nearly 3,000 contract
faculty, teaching assistants, graduate assistants and research
assistants at York University within three separate units. Unit 1
(Graduate Students with Teaching Contracts, mostly Teaching
Assistants), Unit 2 (Contract Faculty) and Unit 3 (Graduate
Assistants). All three
have been attempting to negotiate a collective agreement with York for
several months.
In mass meetings, members of all three units voted a
resounding No! to permitting
York's "final offer"' to even go to a
ratification vote. "Our members have loudly and clearly given York
University Administration the same message we have been telling for
months -- namely that the positions they were advancing at the
bargaining table were
unacceptable," said Devin Lefebvre, chair of CUPE 3903.
"York could have listened to what we've been telling
them and actually negotiated. Instead, they chose to hold to positions
they knew were unacceptable to the bargaining committee and the
membership," Lefebvre said.
He told CBC there were three outstanding issues the
union wanted to see addressed: job security for contract faculty,
accessibility and equity in the workplace, and stable and predictable
graduate studies funding.
Revealing that the stand of Ontario College faculty for
stable working lives is also an issue in the Universities Maija Duncan,
communications officer for the union, said that contract faculty
sometimes learn just weeks or days ahead if they will be teaching in
the upcoming semester. "A lot of people here have been teaching at York
for
five, 10, 20 years, and they still need to reapply for their
jobs every semester," she said.
"We are deeply concerned that the administration
insists that it will be 'business as usual' and will not be cancelling
classes," said Devin Lefebvre. Administration needs to be honest with
students -- our members are responsible for delivering 60 per cent
of the course work on campus, and it will not be business as usual
[...]."
Carleton Workers Say No!
to Attacks on
Defined Benefit
Pensions
Eight hundred administrative, technical, and library
staff at Carleton University began strike action on March 5 to
defend their defined benefit pension plans. The union points out that
despite administration's claims to the contrary, they are demanding the
deletion of key language that protects members from changes to pension
provisions that may be decided without the agreement of the union. The
university has attempted to paint the union as requesting "special
treatment" in the pension plan based on its refusal to accept the
university's changes to the language pertaining to its bargaining unit
within the larger plan for all university employees. However, the union
has responded pointing out that, in fact, the protections from changes
to their defined benefit pension plan they are defending is a benefit
for everyone under the Plan and furthermore that having different
language for different groups in a joint pension plan happens at other
institutions.
The university has been spreading disinformation about
the union's demands, presenting them as an effort to take control of
the pension plan. In response, the union has explained why it is
adamantly defending the pension plan from arbitrary changes:
"Over the past 15 years, Carleton has implemented
a series of very serious cuts to the benefit levels in the pension
plan, including the elimination of an early retirement bridge, an
increase to the penalty for retiring early, and -- most
dramatically -- removing the protection in the plan against
post-retirement benefit
reduction [the "non-reduction guarantee," which no other Ontario
university with
a hybrid plan has removed].
"But it gets worse. In 2010, the University
decided to start requiring plan members to pay a major share of the
employer's pension contribution obligation -- worth about 2 per
cent of payroll. This change actually violated the CUPE 2424
collective agreement and a grievance was filed in 2010. The
resolution of that
grievance in 2015 was only a temporary measure -- a Letter of
Understanding that expired in 2017 with our collective agreement.
The Employer then brought a proposal into collective bargaining to
remove the contract language that protects our pension contribution
rate from further changes without the Union's consent. This is
clearly a concession -- this language protecting our contribution rates
has been in our collective agreement for more than 40 years and
the Employer has given no good reason for removing it. As we did in
resolving the grievance, the Union has again offered to accept a
continuation of the 2011 rate increase until its expiry
in 2021 -- but the Employer has rejected this, and insisted that
our members should no longer have this protection in our contract."
Workers' Forum extends its full support to
the striking workers at Carleton and calls on everyone to help block
the university's attempts to divide the various collectives of workers
at the university for purposes of imposing its anti-social
restructuring
of their pension plan.
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: office@cpcml.ca
|