May 18, 2019 - No. 18
50th Anniversary
of the
Regina Conference
A Decisive Event
in the
Political Life
of Canada
![](../images2019/Party/Historical/890000-HB-Regina-20thAnniversaryoftheReginaConference03.jpg)
Hardial Bains speaks in Regina in 1989 on the twentieth anniversary of
the Regina Conference.
National Patriots' Day in Quebec
• Honour the
Memory of Those Who Fought in the 1837-38 Rebellion to Vest
Sovereign Decision-Making Power in the People
• The Key
Role
Played by Patriot Women
• Program of
Activities on the Occasion of National Patriots' Day
Canadians Pay Utmost Attention to
Developing
Anti-Imperialist Solidarity
• The
Hooliganism of the U.S. Imperialists Knows No Bounds
- Nick Lin -
• Keep
Canada-Cuba Relations on an Even Keel by Upholding International Rule
of
Law
- Margaret Villamizar -
• Upholding
Venezuela's Sovereignty and the International Rule
of Law Is a
Matter of Principle
• Windsor and
District Labour Council Condemns Canada's
Interference in
Venezuela and Opposes Any U.S. Pressure
to Disrupt Friendly
Relations with Cuba
• Important Meeting in June to
Discuss the Developments
on the Korean Peninsula
71st Anniversary of Al Nakba
• Thousands
of
Palestinians Uphold Right of Return
• Conditions
of the Palestinian People on the Eve of the 71st Commemoration of the
Palestinian
Nakba
- Dr. Ola Awad, President,
Palestinian
Central Bureau of Statistics -
Supplement
• 50th
Anniversary of the Regina Conference
50th Anniversary of the Regina Conference
This year, in the month of May, we celebrate the 50th
anniversary of the Regina Conference held in that city on May 7,
1969. The Regina Conference went down in history as an important
preparatory step for the founding of the Communist Party of
Canada (Marxist-Leninist) whose 50th anniversary we will
celebrate next year.
This month, we also
celebrate the 51st anniversary of the
reorganization of the Party's precursor organization, The
Internationalists, as a Marxist-Leninist youth and student
organization. The Internationalists,
originally
founded
in
Vancouver
on
March
13,
1963,
was
reorganized
under
the
leadership
of
its
founder
Hardial
Bains,
in
Montreal
from May 7 to May 25,
1968. To celebrate that achievement, The Internationalists
held the Regina Conference a year later and it became a
development of historic import to the political life of Canada.
This is because it marked a crucial step towards the creation of
CPC(M-L) as the political party of the Canadian working class, a
revolutionary party capable of and dedicated to providing the
struggles of the working class and people with the consciousness
and organization they require to win victory.
On this occasion the Central Committee of CPC(M-L) sends
revolutionary greetings to all
the activists who joined the work of The
Internationalists in the
1960s and especially to those who were at the Regina Conference and
participated in uniting all Marxist-Leninists from that period
into one party, as well as all those who have joined this work
since then. The Regina Conference defended the principle that the
working class is one and it needs its own political party to
elaborate its own independent aims and realize its own striving
for empowerment as it constitutes the nation and vests
sovereignty in the people.
On this occasion, the Central Committee of CPC(M-L) also
sends militant
revolutionary greetings to the U.S. Marxist-Leninist Organization
and its leadership. The participation of the U.S.
Marxist-Leninists at the Regina Conference was one of its
specific features which contributed to building the strong
fraternal relations between the U.S. and Canadian
Marxist-Leninists which have been indispensable to building the
unity between the U.S. and Canadian working class and to settling
scores with the U.S. imperialists and Canada's integration into
the U.S. war machine. We treasure these relations established at
that time, 50 years ago, and dedicate our work to strengthening
them. On this occasion we salute the work of the U.S. working
class and people to speak in their own name and bring an anti-war
government into being. We pledge to contribute to this work to
the best of our ability.
The Regina Conference led by The Internationalists
had
such an impact on the turn of events for the communist movement
in this country that we are devoting the TML Weekly
Supplement to a discussion on "The Work of The Internationalists
and the Regina Conference" as well as reproducing the speech by
Hardial Bains titled "The Origin of Consciousness and Social
Change" delivered at the First Inter-Disciplinary Conference
successfully held at the University of Windsor, February 9-11,
1996.
That conference stressed that the world is going through
a
defining moment in social development in which the main task and
content centres around the need that has objectively arisen for
new and modern arrangements in all fields of life. The nature and
role of consciousness was given specific treatment, underscoring
the need for a consciousness which emerges out of present real
life, free of all preconceived notions and synonymous with social
change. This discussion is crucial for those who are taking up
for solution the problems which the communist and workers'
movement is tackling today.
![Haut de
page](top.gif)
National Patriots' Day in Quebec
![](../images2019/Quebec/File/180521-MontrealJNP-01.JPG)
Patriots' day celebration in Montreal, May 21, 2018.
Victoria Day, which this year falls on
Monday,
May 20, is celebrated as National Patriots' Day in Quebec, the
day which pays tribute to the sacrifices and deeds of the
patriots of Lower Canada in the rebellion against the British of
1837-38. Marches, historic exhibits, conferences and performances
take place to mark the rebellion of 1837-1838 and to honour the
memory of the Patriots who gave their lives or were forced into
exile in the struggle to end British colonial rule by
establishing a Republic of Quebec.
The project of the Patriots for
the republic was brutally suppressed and, on the basis of that
suppression, the British established what was called responsible
government. They defined rights in Canada based on what were called two
founding nations and established what are called the democratic
institutions by preserving the role of the royal prerogative and
privilege. This
government vested sovereignty -- the decision-making power -- in
the Queen of England, as the artificial person of state, which was
supposed to be neutral and above the warring factions within the
ruling class. It maintained strict dictatorship over the propertyless
majority and government of accommodation so long as the colony's ruling
classes served the interests of the British Empire. This division of
the polity between those who rule in the name of an artificial person
of state called the sovereign, and those who are ruled exists to this
day. Today, governments are brought to power through an electoral
system over which the people exercise no control. They are instruments
of nation-wrecking, actively involved in U.S. imperialist wars of
aggression and regime change to realize their striving for world
domination. The project for which the Patriots fought lives on today in
the nation-building project of the workers and people to solve the
crisis of the democratic institutions in their favour, engage in modern
nation-building to change the direction of the economy, humanize the
social and natural environment and make Canada and Quebec a Zone
for Peace.
The 1837-38 Patriots' Uprising is an important event in
the
history of Quebec and Canada. Its significance must be grasped to
understand the present-day situation and not be misled by
illusions that what are called the democratic institutions are
immutable and that the people are destined to be deprived of
decision-making power. On the contrary, the establishment of a
modern Quebec state on its own basis remains necessary to settle
the crisis of the democratic institutions in a manner that
favours the people by ending the stranglehold of the institutions
established out of the suppression of the nation-building project
the Patriots put forward in 1837-1838. These so-called democratic
institutions were based on the arrangements the British oligarchs
found "reasonable" to strengthen British colonial rule after the
English defeated the French at the Plains of Abraham in 1759 and
Quebec passed from being a French colony to a British colony. The
British power divided the people on an ethnocultural basis and
enshrined this division in the Act of Union of 1840. Ever
since then, the line of divide and rule has served first the
British and then the Anglo-Canadian state, today integrated into
the U.S. war machine, to impose the dictate of the ruling elites
on both the Quebec and the Canadian peoples as well as the First
Nations. It is clear that after the rebellion of 1837-1838, all
those patriots who refused to conciliate with these so-called
reasonable accommodations were either hanged or exiled and with
this infamy, the present democratic institutions of
so-called responsible government came into being to keep the
people out of the power-sharing arrangements.
Today, to realize the cause for
which the Patriots fought in
1837-1838, the working class must constitute the nation and vest
sovereignty in the people. The people must be empowered so that
they become the decision-makers in all political, economic,
social and cultural affairs that concern them and their nation.
This need is all the more urgent as the governments of Quebec and
Canada intensify the sell-out of the natural and human resources
and establish new arrangements to facilitate the political,
economic and military integration of Canada and Quebec into the
U.S. imperialist war machine and restructure the state in the
service of the narrow private interests of powerful oligopolies
which operate on a global basis. To cover up the fact that they are in
the service of these narrow private interests, they blame the people
for being racist, anti-immigrant and narrow-minded. Their refusal to
open society's path to progress is seen in increasing attempts to push
the politics of division in the name of rights and scandal so that the
people are reduced to a role of witnessing the daily spectacle of
political factions challenging each other as to who will best represent
the values they allege the people hold dear to get away with imposing
different versions of their neo-liberal nation-wrecking agenda. All of
it destroys the kind of arrangements the people require to flourish.
On this occasion, TML Weekly honours the
Patriots from
Upper and Lower Canada who fought and gave their lives for the
cause of society's progress. Today's patriots honour their memory
by advancing that cause within the present conditions. The
struggle of the peoples of Quebec, the First Nations and Canada
to vest sovereign decision-making power in themselves is more
important than ever.
Reference
Principles Involved in the Exercise of
Quebec Sovereignty -- Selected Texts - Parti
marxiste-léniniste du Quebec.
![Haut de
page](top.gif)
In 1837-38, the role played by
patriot women was second
to
none. They stood in the front ranks in the mobilization and
organization of the people of Lower Canada to combat the British
colonialists and affirm the Republic of Lower Canada. Their
ingenuity and sacrifices for the success of the republican cause
are legendary.
In 1837, within the framework of the effort to create an
economy appropriate to the young republic and end its economic
subjugation to Great Britain, women initiated a boycott of
British goods and trade. They began to weave clothes from the
country's own yarn and during the people's assemblies young women
pledged to save their hearts for those who dared to clothe
themselves in Canadian cloth. At mealtimes, they used maple syrup
instead of sugar from the West Indies and served cider
instead of wine. Historian Micheline Lachance informs that more
than 250 women from the Parish of Saint-Antoine organized a
sumptuous dinner where all imported products were formally
banned.
On August 13, 1837, the Central and Permanent Committee
of the
Patriots received a petition from Marie-Louise Félix, wife of
Patriot notary Jean-Joseph Girouard, requesting the creation of
the Association of Patriotic Women of the County of Two
Mountains. During the same period, at patriot assemblies the
banner "Honour to Patriot Women" was raised.
Marie-Louise and her sister
Marie-Victoire who was married to
the patriot merchant Jean-Baptiste Dumouchel, settled in
Saint-Benoît and records show that both were active in the
Patriot cause, as were their three children: Vital-Léandre,
Camille and Hercule. Besides having participated in the founding
of the Association of Patriotic Women, Marie-Victoire was also
known for having made the Patriot Flag of Two Mountains,
representing a golden muskellunge enveloped in a pine branch with
the letters C for Canada and J-Bte, for Jean-Baptiste, the symbol
of the habitants of Lower Canada during that period. That same
flag was raised during the Battle of Saint-Eustache.
![](../images2019/Quebec/Historic/1837-drapeauPatriote3Montagnes.jpg)
Patriot Flag of Two Mountains
|
To crush the rebels and the aspirations of the people of
Lower Canada to rid themselves of the yoke of the British Empire, the
British army responded with fire and sword. Records show that, at that
time, women and families connected in any way to the Patriot movement
were abandoned to raise their children and care for the elderly, and
made to suffer the worst humiliations. But
they courageously faced the violence of the British military.
When their homes were pillaged or burned, the women had only
themselves to rely on and the solidarity of their compatriots to
survive. They were forced to take to the road with their families
over long miles in search of shelter. Some, such as the
sister of Doctor Chénier, crossed village after village to
inquire about and give news of the patriots on the battlefield.
Émilie Boileau, living in Chambly, organized Patriot assemblies
from her home. She was armed at all times and Patriot
Robert-Shore-Milnes Bouchette wrote in his memoirs, "We had
hardly entered the room when we saw people at the back of the
room respectfully make room to allow a woman to pass, who came
towards us in a calm and dignified manner. In her right hand she
held a gun, its barrel resting on her left arm."[1] Others, such as the young Labrie
and Berthelot women, melted lead to make bullets and made powder
ammunition rounds. They were never far from the battlefield,
ready to care for the wounded.
Women did not hesitate to offer refuge to patriots on
the run,
even at the risk of their own lives. In a letter dated March 9, 1838
intended for his wife, the Patriot notary Girouard related, "If you see
Mrs.
Mongrain, do not forget to express to her my deep gratitude for
her concern when I was kept by the brave patriot women in the
cellar of the de Payen house ... What a spectacle it was! It is
always in my thoughts. If ever I return to St-Benoît, and have
the means to do so, I will assemble all those generous women
amongst us that promises, money, fear failed in having them
betray any of their compatriots. I would like an opportunity to
thank them, to express to them my recognition and admiration for
their patriotism."[2]
The British power offered only prison, exile and death
in response to the will of the people to establish a Republic of Lower
Canada, but women did not submit to humiliation and fear and continued
to defend the Patriot movement. They visited and provided care to
prisoners, interceded with the authorities in defence of the just cause
of their spouse, brother, son and demanded their release. Euphrosine
Lamontagne-Perrault, who lost two sons in the Rebellion -- one killed,
the other in exile -- exemplified the spirit of the women at the time:
"if it was to do all over again and my children wanted to act as they
had, I would not try to stop them as in no way were they driven by
ambition, but by love of their country and hate against the injustices
they were made to suffer."
Notes
1. Mémoires de
Robert-S.-M. Bouchette (1804-1840), collected by his son Errol
Bouchette, with notes by A.-D. Decelles.
2. Jean-Joseph
Girouard
(1795-1855),
"Lettre addressée à son épouse Marie Louise
Félix (1780-1846)
from the Montreal prison March 9, 1838."
![Haut de
page](top.gif)
![Haut de
page](top.gif)
Canadians Pay Utmost Attention to
Developing
Anti-Imperialist Solidarity
- Nick Lin -
![](http://cpcml.ca/images2019/AntiGlobalization/Slogans/011117ottawa6crop4.jpg)
Working people across Canada continue to pay attention
to the unfolding events internationally that require them to take a
stand to uphold the international rule of law and organize actions in
solidarity with the peoples of the world who have courageously set
independent paths for themselves, for which they are increasingly being
targeted by U.S. imperialism. Canadians must not accept U.S. dictate in
world affairs which seeks to overturn the principles and norms of
international relations. These have been expressly codified so as to
maintain peaceful relations between countries and to find diplomatic
means to settle disputes between countries.
The U.S. is blatantly
violating with impunity the UN Charter,
as well as fundamental norms of international relations
established by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and other
treaties and agreements. It is even violating the Charter of its
instrument the Organization of American States, because it has
been unable to impose its narrow aims on the member states that
make up that body. It launches wars of aggression, and uses and
threatens the use of force. It imposes economic sanctions and
blockades,
considered acts of war, including through carrying out acts of piracy
on
the high seas, as well as seizing assets of other countries in
financial institutions. This U.S. exceptionalism is wreaking
havoc on the international rule of law.
Working people in Canada recognize that they have a
particular duty in this situation, given that the government of Canada
is fully
embroiled in many of these activities, as one of those countries
appeasing U.S. imperialism and exceptionalism in the name of
upholding a rules-based order. They are taking public stands to
reject the unacceptable activities of the Canadian government and
opposing the disinformation about high ideals to turn truth on
its head.
The situation requires that Canadians step up their
activities
to develop their anti-imperialist solidarity with the peoples of
the world and to make Canada a Zone for Peace. The hooliganism of
the U.S. imperialists clearly knows no bounds and is creating the
conditions for a new world war. This must not pass.
Below are some of the latest
developments that require the attention of peace- and
justice-loving people in Canada.
Stepped up Blockade Against Cuba
The U.S. activated Title III of the Helms-Burton Act
against Cuba, on May 2, to permit U.S. citizens and companies to sue
the
Cuban
government as well as businesses and other entities from third
countries making use of properties nationalized after the Cuban
Revolution, rather than receiving compensation offered by
the Cuban government under provisions in international
law.[1] At the time the
U.S. refused to take compensation offered by Cuba for such properties.
Under these circumstances, Canadians must see to it that
the
government of Canada does not submit to interference in its
affairs and its relations with Cuba, through the extraterritorial
application of U.S. laws against Canadian companies doing
business in Cuba, or permit the undermining of Canada's
longstanding friendly diplomatic relations with Cuba. The recent
indefinite closure of the Canadian Embassy's visa office in
Havana is already having an impact on travel and exchanges
between Cubans and Canadians.
Ongoing Attempt at Regime Change in Venezuela
The U.S. announced on April 5 that it will block
Venezuelan
shipments of oil to Cuba and has since begun doing so. The U.S.
suspended all commercial
passenger and cargo flights between the United States and
Venezuela on May 15. U.S. Homeland Security claims that
"conditions in Venezuela threaten the safety and security of
passengers, aircraft, and crew traveling to or from that
country."
U.S. police invaded the Venezuelan Embassy in
Washington, DC
on May 16, to remove U.S. activists present with the permission
of the Venezuelan government. Those activists were there to
protect the embassy from takeover by illegitimate representatives
of the U.S.-backed opposition forces as part of the attempt at
regime change in Venezuela. Under the Vienna
Convention on Diplomacy, the sovereignty of embassies must be
upheld and they must be protected by the host country even in times of
war and when relations are
severed.[2]
When it comes to Venezuela, the Canadian government is
fully
embroiled in the U.S. attempt at regime change. For example,
Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland is very much the handmaiden
for the U.S. imperialist aims in Venezuela, spearheading the Lima
Group and advising the self-proclaimed president Juan Guaidó.
Naval Blockade of Democratic Republic of Korea
The U.S. seized the M/V Wise Honest earlier in
May in
what news agencies refer to as "civil forfeiture action," an
attempt to provide a legal veneer to what is effectively an act
of piracy. It has a load of coal bound for the Democratic Republic
of Korea (DPRK). The U.S. Justice Department accused the Korea
Songi Shipping Company of paying U.S. dollars through "unwitting
U.S. financial institutions" for improvements, equipment
purchases and service expenditures for the Wise Honest,
activities it claims are in violation of U.S. laws. The ship was
initially detained in April 2018 by Indonesia and has now been
towed to port in American Samoa. This "civil forfeiture action"
is a totally illegitimate extrajudicial application of U.S.
domestic civil procedure, that has no standing in international
law.
It was on January 12, 2018 that 17 countries,
including
Canada and the United States, signed a statement indicating that
they are "postured" to enforce UN Security Council Resolutions
2375 and 2397 against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea
(DPRK). These enforcement measures include interdicting and
inspecting ships suspected to be trading with the DPRK in
materials prohibited under UN Security Council sanctions, based
on "information that provides reasonable grounds." This is
effectively a naval blockade, an act of war.[3]
Attempts to Isolate Iran
Last year, the U.S. withdrew from the 2015 Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that it and other countries signed
with Iran, under which Iran agreed to curb its uranium enrichment
capacity in return for sanctions relief. Now the U.S. has announced new
rounds of renewed sanctions in March and May, including a blockade
against Iranian oil exports. Its aim is to coerce other countries to
abide by its unilateral sanctions and pressure them not to fulfil their
responsibility under the JCPOA to contribute to the development of
Iran's economy through trade. The U.S. has also imposed sanctions on
Iran's steel, iron, aluminum and copper industries. The U.S. recently
deployed an aircraft carrier battle group, B-52 bombers, and Patriot
missiles to the area, claiming Iran represents a threat to its troops
and interests in the region.
Economic War with Syria
With the government of Syria having prevailed over
terrorists and foreign intervention, the U.S. is ramping up its
economic war against the Syrian people with sanctions to isolate the
government of Bashar El Assad to continue its attempts at regime change.
Canadians must oppose any involvement of Canada in these
sanctions or future military actions, which have caused the Syrian
people so much harm.
Huawei and U.S. Trade War with China
The U.S. is using "national security" concerns to apply
tariffs against other countries' products, as in the case of
Chinese telecommunications company Huawei. The U.S. Commerce
Department said on May 15 that it was adding Huawei and 70
affiliates to its so-called Entity List which would ban it from
acquiring components and technology from U.S. firms without prior
U.S. government approval. The same day President Donald Trump
signed an executive order barring U.S. firms from using telecom
equipment made by companies deemed to pose a national security
risk.
Canada is already doing the bidding of the U.S.
vis-à-vis
Huawei, in the name of high ideals. As previously pointed out in TML
Weekly, claims by the Canadian government that it is upholding the
rule of law ring absolutely hollow.[4]
Notes
1. "Let Us Make Sure
the Government of Canada Does Not Appease the U.S. in Its Attempt
to Strangle Cuba!" TML Weekly, April 20, 2019.
2. The Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic
Relations of 1961 is an official United Nations treaty, ratified
by the United States in 1972. Article 22 of the convention
states:
i) The premises of the mission shall
be inviolable. The agents of the receiving State may not enter
them, except with the consent of the head of the
mission.
ii) The receiving State
is under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect
the premises of the mission against any intrusion or damage and
to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the mission or
impairment of its dignity.
iii)
The premises of the mission, their furnishings and other property
thereon and the means of transport of the mission shall be immune
from search, requisition, attachment or
execution.
Similarly, Article 45 states:
If diplomatic relations are broken off between
two States, or if a mission is permanently or temporarily
recalled:
a) The receiving State
must, even in the case of armed conflict, respect and protect the
premises of the mission, together with its property and
archives;
b) The sending State
may entrust the custody of the premises of the mission, together
with its property and archives, to a third State acceptable to
the receiving State;
c) The
sending State may entrust the protection of its interests and
those of its nationals to a third State acceptable to the
receiving State.
3.
"U.S. Initiates All-Out Naval Blockade of DPRK -- An Act of War," TML
Weekly Supplement, January 13, 2018.
4. "Attacks Against Huawei
Have Nothing
to Do with Rule of Law," Louis Lang, TML Weekly, March 16,
2019.
![Haut de
page](top.gif)
- Margaret Villamizar -
![](../images2019/LatAmCaribbean/Cuba/190511-Montreal-embassadeCA_Cuba-01cr.jpg)
Montreal picket May 11, 2019, against Canada's suspension of visa
services from its
Consular Office in Havana.
Canadians are increasingly concerned about the
disruption
of Canada-Cuba relations, especially when the Trudeau government
so closely takes its orders from the U.S. which is stepping up
its interference in the internal affairs of other countries. They
want Canada-Cuba relations to be kept on an even keel by
upholding the international rule of law, and will not accept that
the Canadian government should be acting to serve U.S. aggressive
aims in Cuba.
It is in this light that
many people paid close attention on
Thursday, May 16, when Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland
conducted a working visit to Havana where she met with her
counterpart, Cuba's Minister of Foreign Affairs Bruno Rodríguez
Parrilla. In advance of the meeting, Freeland said she intended to
discuss "the deteriorating situation in Venezuela" as well as how
Canada and Cuba could "work together to defend Canadians
conducting legitimate trade and investment in Cuba in light of
the United States ending the suspension of Title III of the Helms-Burton
Act." Freeland is not just anyone when
it
comes to Venezuela. She has been spearheading the Lima Group
whose sole purpose is to impose U.S.-led regime change against
the democratically elected government of Nicolás Maduro, a
government supported by the majority of the world's
countries.
![](../images2019/LatAmCaribbean/Cuba/190516-CubaCubanForAffairsMinisterMeetsFreeland-MinrexCr.jpg)
Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland meets with her counterpart,
Cuba's Minister of Foreign Affairs Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla in
Havana, May 16, 2019.
At the conclusion of her visit she said in a tweet that
"Canada, together with its partners in the Lima Group, hopes to
find ways to work with Cuba to address the worsening political,
economic and humanitarian crisis in Venezuela," saying that she
had a "frank discussion" about that with Rodríguez Parrilla.
Regarding the Helms-Burton Act she simply repeated what
she said in a statement a month ago when the U.S. announced its
decision -- that Canada would defend its businesses conducting
legitimate trade and investment in Cuba.
Freeland is the first high-ranking member of the
Canadian
government to visit Cuba since Prime Minister Trudeau's official
visit in November 2016. To all appearances the main purpose of
her visit was to follow up on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's May
3 phone call to President Miguel Díaz-Canel on behalf of the
so-called Lima Group of countries to seek the Cuban government's
cooperation in foisting regime change on Venezuela "peacefully"
by forcing the holding of new presidential elections. At the time
Freeland put it more bluntly, stating imperiously that "Cuba
needs to not be part of the problem in Venezuela, but become part
of the solution."
The Cuban President's response to Canada's
overture on behalf of the U.S.-led regime change forces was to
reiterate Cuba's principled stand in support of dialogue with
President Nicolás Maduro based on respect for Venezuela's
sovereignty and international law, without threats or foreign
intervention. The same position was conveyed to Minister Freeland
by Minister Rodríguez at their meeting in Havana. A statement
issued
on May 16 by Cuba's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Minrex)
indicated that "Minister Rodríguez ratified Cuba's willingness
to
contribute initiatives aimed at promoting a respectful dialogue
with the government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela based
on the sovereign equality of states, the principles of
international law and provisions of the Proclamation of Latin
America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace, in particular the
rejection of the use or threat of force and the application of
unilateral coercive economic measures that cause humanitarian
harm."
Regarding other matters discussed, the statement said
Rodríguez thanked Canada for the support it has traditionally
given to the resolution against the U.S. blockade of Cuba at the
United Nations General Assembly and the Canadian government's
stand in opposition to the recent application by the current U.S.
administration of Title III of the Helms-Burton Act.
![](../images2019/LatAmCaribbean/Cuba/190317-VancouverMonthlyPicketEndblockadeCuba-VFSC-01cr.jpg)
Monthly picket in Vancouver demands end to the U.S. blockade of Cuba,
March 17, 2019.
It also indicated that Rodríguez expressed Cuba's
concern over
Canada's decision to suspend visa services to Cuban citizens from
its Consular Office in Havana, saying this would negatively
affect Cubans' family and personal ties as well as the
development of cultural, educational, academic and scientific
exchanges between Cubans and Canadians. He further told Freeland
that Canada's decision to withdraw part of its diplomatic and
consular staff from Havana was unfounded, given the absence of
evidence of a risk to their safety. Cuban and international
experts have to date failed to establish any basis for the
alleged "sonic attacks" that the U.S. and Canada have said
affected their diplomatic personnel in Havana.
Workers taking part in the recent Canadian Union of
Postal
Workers 2019 Convention in Toronto from May 13-17 reported with
dismay that for the first time, their counterparts from the
Federation of Cuban Workers (CTC) were not able to attend because
they could not get their visas on time.
![](../images2019/LatAmCaribbean/Cuba/190417-OttawaMonthlyPicketEndblockadeCuba-OCC-01.jpg)
Monthly picket in Ottawa, April 17, 2019.
Context of Freeland's Visit to Cuba
Early in the morning on the same day Freeland travelled
to
Havana, U.S. police broke into Venezuela's embassy in Washington,
DC. in flagrant violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic
Relations, arresting U.S. activists who had been living and
working inside the building for the last 37 days with the
permission of the Venezuelan government, to protect it from just
such an illegal action. Notably, despite the end of official
diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Venezuela on January
23, Venezuela continues to do its duty to protect the site of the
U.S. Embassy in Caracas.
Freeland, in Washington herself on May 16, to meet with
trade
officials of the Trump administration in an attempt to get U.S.
tariffs removed from Canadian steel and aluminum (which in fact
took place the next day), has said nothing about this
precedent-setting violation of the rules of diplomacy that flies
in the face of the rules-based international order that she
claims to champion.
The visit to Havana also took place as talks were being
held in Oslo, Norway under the auspices of the Norwegian government --
and with the participation of representatives of the Venezuelan
government and opposition -- to explore the possibility of a mediated
dialogue being initiated. The same day, a delegation of the
EU-dominated International Contact Group (ICG) was received in Caracas
by President Nicolás Maduro. Like the Lima Group, the ICG calls
for a "peaceful transition" through the holding of a new presidential
election in Venezuela, with most of its members recognizing Juan
Guaidó as the country's "interim president" in the meantime.
Clearly, given Cuba's prestige and the years it spent working with
Norway as well as Venezuela to facilitate Colombian peace negotiations,
it makes sense for Cuba to play a role in facilitating dialogue and a
peaceful resolution to the crisis in Venezuela today -- as long as the
starting point is, as Cuba maintains, upholding international law and
the rights of the Venezuelan people, not the violation of both, couched
in terms that make it seem otherwise.
Of note in that regard, two days before Freeland
met
with her counterparts in Cuba, her department issued a statement
to say that Prime Minister Trudeau had spoken with the
self-proclaimed "president" of the illegal parallel government of
Venezuela that Canada helped the U.S. set up, commending him for the
latest
round of the failed coup attempt against the government of
Nicolás Maduro. Trudeau represented that attempt to incite a
civil war between Venezuelans as an example of "the courage and
persistent efforts to return democracy to Venezuela" of Jean
Guaidó, the National Assembly and "the people of Venezuela." The
statement said the Prime Minister and the "Interim President"
reaffirmed "the need for the international community to align
itself in order to bring a peaceful transition to Venezuela" and
that Trudeau had updated Guaidó on the Lima Group's alleged
efforts to this end, mentioning his own discussions with other
international partners. Guaidó is said to have thanked Trudeau
for Canada's role in helping lead the international response to
the crisis in Venezuela.
In spite of whatever illusions the regime change forces
Canada is part of may have, or machinations they invent to try and
coerce the Cubans to abandon their principled positions in support of
Venezuela's sovereignty and right to self-determination, their efforts
will not succeed -- not with Cuba and not with the Venezuelan people
who have a long tradition of fighting for their freedom and
independence.
In this regard, Canadians need to be vigilant and act
against
any attempts by this or any future government of Canada to
appease the U.S. in its criminal aims against Cuba and Venezuela.
Likewise they should make their voices heard to make sure that
nothing or nobody is allowed to disrupt the longstanding friendly
relations between Canada and Cuba, so that diplomatic relations
continue based on respect for the international rule of law and
equality.
![Haut de
page](top.gif)
![](../images2019/LatAmCaribbean/Venezuela/190416-USDC-VenezuelanEmbassyPoliceOutside-AVN-01cr.jpg) ![](../images2019/LatAmCaribbean/Venezuela/190516-USDC-VenezuelanEmbassyPoliceIllegalBreakIn-ADuarteCr.jpg)
Left: security agents outside Venezuelan Embassy in Washington DC, May
16, 2019; Right: agents illegally enter the embassy on the morning of
May 16, 2019.
On the morning of May 16, U.S. Secret Service and
Department of State special security agents broke down a door to gain
entry to the Venezuelan embassy in Washington, DC. They arrested the
four members of a group of activists calling themselves the Embassy
Protection Collective who had remained inside the building after
electricity and water were cut off and the delivery of food and
medicine was blocked as U.S. authorities imposed a siege against them.
The last diplomatic staff vacated the building on April 24 as a result
of Venezuela and the U.S. breaking off diplomatic relations. In an
attempt to protect the embassy from being taken over illegally by coup
forces, the activists had been living and working in the building since
April 10 with the express permission and as guests of its rightful
owner, the government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. In spite
of this they were removed by force and charged with trespassing, and
the embassy has now been handed over to a representative of the
imposter Juan Guaidó who has illegitimately proclaimed himself
the "interim president" of Venezuela and leader of a phantom parallel
government which the U.S. says it recognizes.
![](../images2019/LatAmCaribbean/Venezuela/190416-USDC-VenezuelanEmbassyPoliceOutside-AVN-02cr.jpg)
Activists were assaulted by police in front of the Venezuelan embassy
in the days leading up
to the May 16 raid.
In anticipation of the course of action the U.S.
government
eventually pursued, the activists issued a statement on May 13
explaining the dangerous precedent it would set and how they
intended to respond to it.
Urgent Message to U.S. State Department
Embassy
Protection Collective, May 13, 2019
This is the 34th day of our living in the Venezuelan
embassy
in Washington, DC. We are prepared to stay another 34 days, or
however long is needed to resolve the embassy dispute in a
peaceful way consistent with international law.
This memo is being sent to
the U.S. and Venezuela as well as
members of our Collective and allies. We are encouraging people
to publish this memo as a transparent process is needed to
prevent the U.S. from making a unilateral decision that could
impact the security of embassies around the world and lead to
military conflict.
There are two ways to resolve the issues around the
Venezuelan
embassy in DC, which we will explain.
Before doing so, we reiterate that our collective is one
of
independent people and organizations not affiliated with any
government. While we are all U.S. citizens, we are not agents of
the United States. While we are here with permission of the
Venezuelan government, we are not their agents or
representatives.
We are here in the embassy lawfully. We are breaking no
laws.
We did not unlawfully enter and we are not trespassing.
1. Exiting with a Protecting Power Agreement
The exit from the embassy that best resolves issues to
the
benefit of the United States and Venezuela is a mutual Protecting
Power Agreement. The United States wants a Protecting Power for
its embassy in Caracas. Venezuela wants a Protecting Power for
its embassy in DC. Such agreements are not uncommon when
diplomatic relations are severed.
A Protecting Power Agreement would avoid a military
conflict
that could lead to war. A war in Venezuela would be catastrophic
for Venezuela, the United States, and for the region. It would
lead to lives lost and mass migration from the chaos and conflict
of war. It would cost the United States trillions of dollars and
become a quagmire involving allied countries around the
world.
We are serving as interim protectors in the hope that
the two
nations can negotiate this resolution. If this occurs we will
take the banners off the building, pack our materials, and leave
voluntarily. The electricity could be turned on and we will drive
out.
We suggest a video walk-through with embassy officials
to show
that the Embassy Protection Collective did not damage the
building. The only damage to the building has been inflicted by
coup supporters in the course of their unprosecuted
break-ins.
2. The United States violates the Vienna
Convention, makes
an illegal eviction and unlawful arrests
This approach will violate international law and is
fraught
with risks. The United States would have to cut the chains in the
front door put up by embassy staff and violate the embassy. We
have put up barriers there and at other entrances to protect us
from constant break-ins and threats from the trespassers whom the
police are permitting outside the embassy. The police's failure
to protect the embassy and the U.S. citizens inside has forced us
to take these actions.
The Embassy Protectors will not barricade ourselves, or
hide
in the embassy in the event of an unlawful entry by police. We
will gather together and peacefully assert our rights to remain
in the building and uphold international law.
Any order to vacate based on a request by coup
conspirators
that lack governing authority will not be a lawful order. The
coup has failed multiple times in Venezuela. The elected
government is recognized by the Venezuelan courts under
Venezuelan law and by the United Nations under international law.
An order by the U.S.-appointed coup plotters would not be
legal.
Such an entry would put embassies around the world and
in the
United States at risk. We are concerned about U.S. embassies and
personnel around the world if the Vienna Convention is violated
at this embassy. It would set a dangerous precedent that would
likely be used against U.S. embassies.
If an illegal eviction and unlawful arrests are made, we
will
hold all decision-makers in the chain of command and all officers
who enforce unlawful orders accountable.
If there is a notice that we are trespassing and need to
vacate the premises, please provide it to our attorney Mara
Verhayden-Hilliard, copied on this memo.
We have taken care of this embassy and request a video
tour of
the building before any arrests.
We hope a wise and calm solution to this issue can be
achieved
so escalation of this conflict can [be] avoided.
There is no need for the United States and Venezuela to
be
enemies. Resolving this embassy dispute diplomatically should
lead to negotiations over other issues between the nations.
![](../images2019/LatAmCaribbean/Venezuela/190518-USDC-ProtestPoliceatVenezuelanEmbassy-ADuarte02.jpg)
Demonstration in Washington, DC on May 18, 2019.
![Haut de
page](top.gif)
The following resolution was passed by the Windsor and
District Labour Council at its May 14 General Membership
Meeting:
The Windsor and District Labour Council condemns the
Canadian
government's continued interference in the affairs of the
Venezuelan people by its participation in the illegal U.S.-led
attempt to overthrow their constitutionally elected president,
Nicolás Maduro, and replace him with an unelected opposition
figure, who at the instigation of the U.S., Canada and a number
of other foreign governments, has illegitimately proclaimed
himself the country's "interim president."
Under no circumstances must Canada participate in or
support a
foreign military intervention in Venezuela or permit the friendly
relations between Canada and Cuba to be disrupted by pressure
from the U.S.
Canada must immediately stop the use of and support for
economic sanctions as a tool for regime change and instead start
respecting the sovereignty and right to self-determination of the
Venezuelan people.
The Labour Council furthermore calls on Canada to make
an
active contribution to a peaceful and democratic solution by
supporting the initiative of Mexico, members of the Caribbean
Community and others who have put forward proposals and offered
their assistance to facilitate dialogue and negotiations between
the contending parties in Venezuela in order to reduce tensions
and prevent violence, guided by the principle of non-intervention
that is enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and
international law.
Toronto
Saturday
June
15,
2019
—
2:00-6:00
pm
TNG
Community Centre, 349 Ontario Street
Keynote Speaker: Professor
Kiyul Chung, 21st. Century
Institute Washington D.C.
Associate Professor, Kim Il Sung
University, Pyongyang, DPRK
Everyone is warmly invited to a public forum on
the struggle
for peace, security and denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
on the occasion of the 19th anniversary of the historic June 2000
North-South Joint Declaration signed by the Democratic People's
Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the Republic of Korea (ROK).
This forum is taking place in the context of recent
developments including the Panmunjom Declaration between the DPRK
and ROK in April 2018, and the subsequent DPRK-U.S. Summits in
Singapore in June 2018 and in Hanoi in February 2019. These
developments have created the potential for a new era of peace on
the Korean Peninsula and normalization of relations between the
DPRK and the U.S. by establishing a process of reciprocal steps
to end the past history of hostility and confrontation. However,
progress toward a solution based on mutual interest has been
blocked by the insistence of the U.S. side on
unilateral demands for the dismantling of the legitimate
defence capacity of the DPRK.
Organized by: Korea Truth Commission (Canadian Chapter)
and
Korean Federation in Canada.
For more information and to RSVP
call 416-768-1107 or email: corfedca@yahoo.ca
![Haut de
page](top.gif)
71st Anniversary of Al Nakba
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/DayofCatastrophe-NAKBAcr.png)
All over Palestine and in cities all over the world,
Palestinians and supporters marked the 71st anniversary of Al
Nakba, also known as the "catastrophe" when, in 1948, 750,000
Palestinians were displaced during and after the establishment of
the state of Israel. To this day more than five million
Palestinians still live as refugees as they wait to return to
their lands in Israel.
The main West Bank rally
was held on May 15 in Ramallah City, in the central occupied West Bank,
during which Palestinians gathered at the grave of the late Palestinian
leader Yasser Arafat, from where thousands marched towards the city
centre, holding high placards, Palestinian flags, and black flags as a
symbol of mourning on Al Nakba. At 12:00 pm, Palestinians stood in
silence as sirens sounded for 71 seconds symbolizing the 71 years of
the Palestinian catastrophe.
Palestinians carried keys signifying their determination
to
return to their original homes, now in present-day Israel, which
they were forced from in 1948. Palestinian Prime Minister
Muhammad Ishtayeh, as well as members of the Palestine Liberation
Organization (PLO), Fatah Central Committee, political factions,
and civic leaders, participated in the mass march, Ma'an News
Agency reports.
In Gaza, Palestinians continued their protests at the
fence
Israel built to isolate Gaza from the other occupied territories
in an attempt to smash the people's resistance movement. News
agencies report that more than 60 Palestinians were injured in
the Gaza Strip as Israeli forces attacked protesters marking the
anniversary. Ashraf al-Qedra, the spokesman for the Gazan Health
Ministry, said that 65 Palestinians, including 22 children and
five women, were injured during the protests and that most of
those injured were hit by live bullets, reports indicate. Qedra
further said that the Israeli forces also targeted the medical
personnel, hitting three paramedics with rubber bullets.
More than 300 Palestinians have been killed since March
30, 2018 when the series of protests called "The Great March of Return"
began and over 17,300 have been injured. Gaza has been under specific
Israeli siege since June 2007 and the Zionists have launched three
major wars against the occupied territory, killing thousands of Gazans
each time and shattering the territory's infrastructure time and time
again. On the occasion of Al Nakba, Hamas said in a statement that
"attempts to divide the Palestinians and tarnish the image of the
unified Palestinian people by judaizing Jerusalem and recognizing it as
the capital of the Israeli occupation, tearing the West Bank apart
through settlement expansion and annexation, strangling Gaza, and
passing the 'Jewish Nation State' law in the occupied territories, as
well as trying to liquidate the Palestine refugee issue by cutting all
aid to [the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine
Refugees], in a bid to end the UN body and abolish the right of return,
are doomed to failure." It rejected all plans aimed at
liquidating the Palestinian cause or abolishing the Palestinian rights,
above all the "Deal of the Century" and emphasized the Palestinian
people's right to resist the occupation with all means possible,
including armed resistance, saying the weapons of the resistance were a
red line.
Rallies commemorating the 71st anniversary of the Nakba
were
also held in other West Bank cities and towns.
Ramallah, Palestine
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-PalestineRamallah-AlNakbaDay-TimesofGaza-02cr.jpg)
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-PalestineRamallah-AlNakbaDay-TimesofGaza-03.jpg)
Gaza, Palestine
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-PalestineGaza-AlNakbaDay-PalestiniansAbroad.jpg)
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-PalestineGaza-AlNakbaDay-MSmiry-03.jpg)
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-PalestineGaza-AlNakbaDay-ShehabNews-03cr.jpg) ![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-PalestineGaza-AlNakbaDay-MSmiry-04.jpg)
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-PalestineGaza-AlNakbaDay-TimesofGazaCr.jpg)
Al Nakba general strike in Gaza
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-PalestineGaza-AlNakbaGeneralStrike-PalestiniansAbroad.jpg)
Tel Aviv, Israel
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-IsraelTelAviv-AlNakbaDay-ActiveStills-02cr.jpg) ![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-IsraelTelAviv-AlNakbaDay-ActiveStills-01.jpg)
Mississauga, ON![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190518-Mississauga-AlNakba71-02.jpg)
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190518-Mississauga-AlNakba-01.jpg)
London, England
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190511-EnglandLondon-Nakba71Demo-PalestineInfoCtre-01.jpg)
New York, USA
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/190515-USNY-Brooklyn-AlNakbaDay-StruggleLaLuchaCr.jpg)
![Haut de
page](top.gif)
- Dr. Ola Awad, President, Palestinian
Central
Bureau of Statistics -
Dr. Ola Awad, President of the Palestinian Central
Bureau
of Statistics, through historical and current data, reviewed the
geographic, demographic and economic situation of the Palestinian
people on the eve of the 71st anniversary of the Palestinian Nakba
on May 15. Information based on that data
follows.
The Nakba: Ethnic Cleansing, Displacement of
Palestinians
and Settler Colonization
Nakba in Palestine describes a process of ethnic
cleansing in which an unarmed nation was destroyed and its
population displaced systematically by gangs and individuals from
all over the world. The Nakba resulted in the displacement
of 800,000 of the 1.4 million Palestinians who lived in 1,300
villages and towns in historical Palestine in 1948. The majority
of the displaced Palestinians ended up in neighbouring Arab
countries and in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and other countries
around the world. Further, thousands of Palestinians -- who
stayed in the area controlled by the Israeli occupation in 1948
-- were driven out of their homes and lands, which were seized by
the Israeli occupation.
According to documentary evidence, the Israelis
controlled 774
towns and villages and destroyed 531 Palestinian towns and
villages during the Nakba. The atrocities of Zionist
forces also included more than 70 massacres in which more than
15,000 Palestinians were martyred.
Demographic Reality: The Palestinian Population Has
Doubled Nine Times Since the 1948 Nakba
The population of Palestine in 1914 was around 690,000,
of
whom only 8 per cent were Jewish. In 1948, the number of Palestinians
in
Palestine exceeded 2 million, 31.5 per cent of them were Jews, their
numbers doubling more than six times during this period. Between
1932 and 1939, the number of Jewish immigrants to Palestine
reached 225,000 and between 1940 and 1947, more than 93,000
migrated to Palestine. Palestine received around 318,000 Jews
between 1932 and 1947, and 540,000 from 1948 to 1975.
Despite the displacement of more than 800,000
Palestinians in
1948, and the displacement of more than 200,000 Palestinians (the
majority of them to Jordan) after the 1967 War, by the end of
2018 the Palestinian world population totalled 13.1 million,
which means that the number of Palestinians in the world has
doubled more than nine times since the events of the Nakba
in 1948. More than half of them live in historical Palestine,
where at the end of 2018 their numbers reached 6.48 million
(compared to 1.57 million in the occupied territories in 1948).
Estimates indicate that the population in the West Bank at the
end of 2018, including Jerusalem, was 2.95 million, with around
1.96 million in Gaza Strip. The population of Jerusalem
Governorate, was about 447,000, of which approximately 65 per cent
(about
281,000) live in those parts of Jerusalem which were annexed by
Israeli occupation in 1967, an area referred to as J1. The data
show that Palestinians represent 49 per cent of the population living
in
historical Palestine, while Jews constitute 51 per cent at the end of
2018. The Israeli occupation continues to control over 85 per cent of
the
area of historical Palestine, which amounts to 27,000 square
kilometres, while the remaining areas continue to endure further
attempts at usurpation and control. It should be noted that under
the British Mandate only 1,682 square kilometres of historical
land of Palestine was used by Jews, which represents 6.2 per cent.
Palestinian Refugees Status
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/BethlehamUNRWAOfficeDignityisPriceless.jpg)
Writing on wall of UN Refugee agency office in Bethlehem reads "Dignity
is priceless."
Records of the United Nations Relief and Work Agency
(UNRWA)
reported on January 1, 2018 that the total number of Palestinian
refugees was 6.02 million, 28.4 per cent of whom live in 58 camps (10
in
Jordan, nine in Syria, 12 in Lebanon, 19 in the West Bank and
eight in Gaza Strip). Estimates, however, indicate that this is a
minimum number of refugees as many are not registered. This
number does not include the Palestinians displaced in the period
from 1949 till the Six-Day War in June 1967. The UNRWA definition
of refugees does not cover the Palestinians who migrated or who
were displaced after 1967 because of the war and who were not
registered refugees. On the other hand, the Population, Housing
and Establishments Census 2017 showed that refugees represented
43 per cent of the population of the State of Palestine.
Population Density: Gaza Strip Has One of the
Highest Population Densities in the World
The
population density in the State of Palestine at the end of 2018
was 816 individuals per square kilometre: 522 individuals per
square kilometre in the West Bank and 5,375 individuals per
square kilometre in Gaza Strip, noting that 66 per cent of the total
population of Gaza Strip are refugees. The flux of refugees has
turned Gaza Strip into one of the most densely populated areas in
the world. Despite the small area of Gaza Strip, the Israeli
occupation set up a buffer zone more than 1,500 metres long along
the Eastern border. Consequently, the Israeli occupation controls
about 24 per cent of the total area of Gaza Strip (365 square
kilometres).
Continuous Siege of Gaza Strip
The continuous Siege of the Gaza Strip, one of the most
densely populated areas in the world, has led to a sharp rise in
unemployment. The unemployment rate has reached 52 per cent, around 72
per cent
of youth aged 15-24 years are unemployed. The siege also shakes
the economy of Gaza Strip and has made over half of its
population poor (53 per cent), and 11 per cent of households use an
improved
drinking water source in Gaza Strip due to the deterioration in
the quality of water extracted from the coastal basin.
More than 100,000 Martyrs Since the Nakba
1948
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/290331-GazaFuneralTamirAbuAl-Khair-killedLandDay-TofG-01.jpg)
Funeral, March 31, 2019 for Tamir Abu Al-Khair, one of 4 youth killed
in land day protests in Gaza.
The number of Palestinian and Arab martyrs from
the Nakba in 1948 up to the present day (inside and
outside Palestine) has reached about 100,000. The number of
martyrs killed between September 29, 2000 and May 7, 2019 was
10,853. The bloodiest year was 2014 with 2,240 Palestinian
martyrs, of whom 2,181 were from Gaza Strip. The number of
Palestinian martyrs reached 312 persons during 2018, among them
57 children and three women. The Israeli occupation also detained
the bodies of 15 martyrs.
About 17,000 Wounded Since the Start of the Marches of
Return
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/File/180330-PalestineGazaLandDayMarchofReturn-Bea-03cr.jpg)
Youth injured on Land Day, March 30, 2018 as the Great Return
March begins.
The number of wounded Palestinians reached about 29,600
persons in 2018, while data from the Ministry of Health indicates
that the number of wounded in Gaza Strip has reached 16,800 since
the Marches of Return began on the occasion of Land Day, March
30, 2018. It is noteworthy that 136 citizens have had amputations
as a result of the Israeli occupation forces' aggression against
the Palestinians in the March of Return and breaking the siege
east of Gaza Strip. The number of martyrs was 272 citizens, among
them 54 children and six women and elderly, along with four
paramedics and three journalists.
About 1 Million Detentions Since
1967
The Israeli occupation has detained about 1
million Palestinians since 1967. This year, the Israeli
occupation had arrested about 5,700 Palestinians, as of the end
of March, of whom 250 were children and 47 were women. Since the
beginning of 2018, the Israeli occupation has arrested 6,500
Palestinians, including 1,063 children and 140 women. In
addition, the Israeli occupation has imposed house arrest on 300
children in Jerusalem since October 2015. Around 36 children are
still under house arrest.
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/2018-PalestiniansDetainedbyIsraeliforces.jpg)
Continuous Confiscation of Land
The Israeli occupation uses land classification
according to
the Oslo Agreement (A, B, C) to tighten control over Palestinian
land, especially in areas classified as (C) -- an area of
3,375,000 dunums. About 2,642,000 dunums -- constituting 76 per cent of
the total area classified (C) -- is exploited by the Israeli
occupation directly. The area classified (A) is about one million
dunums, the area classified (B) is 1,035,000 dunums, and the area
classified "Others" is 250,000 dunums and includes Natural
Reserves, J1 in East Jerusalem and H2 in Hebron, along with
unclassified areas. In 2018, the Israeli occupation confiscated
508 dunums of Palestinian land, in addition to confiscating
hundreds of dunums of the Palestinians through the expansion of
Israeli checkpoints and the establishment of military checkpoints
to protect the settlers.
Israeli Occupation: Continuous Expansion of Settlements
There were 435 Israeli occupation settlements and
military
bases in the West Bank (including 150 settlements and 116
outposts) by the end of 2017. Data indicate that the total number
of settlers in the West Bank was 653,621 by the end of 2017;
306,529 (47 per cent) lived in Jerusalem Governorate, including 225,335
of them in Jerusalem J1. In demographic terms, the proportion of
settlers to the Palestinian population in the West Bank is around
23 settlers per 100 Palestinians compared with 70 settlers per
100 Palestinians in Jerusalem Governorate.
The expansion and annexation wall isolates more than 12
per cent of
the West Bank area. This has imposed restrictions on 1.9 million
people living in areas close to the wall and/or settlements.
Around 400,000 people live in Area "C." The expansion and
annexation wall that surrounds the city of Jerusalem is about 93
kilometres long and isolates about 84 square kilometres of the
area of Jerusalem Governorate; while the incomplete part of the
wall, about 46 kilometres long, will isolate about 68 square
kilometres.
The Jurisdiction Area of the Israeli occupation
settlements in
the West Bank reached 541.5 square kilometres at the end 2018,
representing about 10 per cent of the West Bank, while the confiscated
areas for the purposes of military bases and military training
are about 18 per cent of the West Bank, which deprives the Palestinian
farmers and herders of access to their farms and pastures. The
Israeli occupation places obstacles to tighten the siege and
restrict the Palestinians' urban expansion, especially in
Jerusalem and Area (C), in the West Bank, which are still under
full Israeli occupation control.
Theft of Agricultural Land
The total area of land classified as being of high or
medium
agricultural value in the West Bank is 2,072,000 dunums,
constituting about 37 per cent of the West Bank. The Palestinians use
only 931,500 dunums which constitutes about 17 per cent of the West
Bank
area.
The reason for the non-exploitation of agricultural land
in
the West Bank is that Area (C), which constitutes about 60 per cent of
the area of the West Bank, is still under full Israeli occupation
control. The Israeli occupation prevents many farmers from
accessing their land and cultivating or caring for cultivated
areas, which has led to the destruction of most of the crops in
those areas. Israeli occupation forces have also bulldozed and
uprooted 7,122 trees in 2018, bringing the number of trees
uprooted to more than one million from 2000 to the end of 2018.
Thousands of dunums have been confiscated by settlers to be
cultivated. The area planted in the Israeli settlements in 2018
reached about 110,000 dunums, the majority irrigated
agriculture.
Jerusalem: Intensive and Systematic Displacement of
Palestinians
![](../images2019/Asia/Palestine/File/190700-PalestineKhanal-AhmarProtestDestruction-ActiveStills.jpg)
Protest against July 2018 Israeli destruction of Bedouin village of
Khan al-Amar near East Jerusalem, to extend an illegal settlement.
The Israeli occupation forces have issued deportation
orders
for 12 Bedouin communities in East Jerusalem, comprising about
1,400 people.
In 2018, the Israeli occupation issued orders to
demolish 546
buildings in the West Bank and Jerusalem, at a time when the need
for new housing units for Palestinians increases. According to
figures and the data of the Housing Conditions Survey 2015, about
61 per cent of households in Palestine will need new housing units over
the next decade. The Israeli occupation demolished 471 buildings
in 2018 (houses and establishments), of which about 46 per cent were in
the city of Jerusalem with 215 demolitions, leading to the forced
displacement of 217 people, including 110 children. Of the
demolished buildings, 157 were residential buildings and 314
establishments. During 2018, the Israeli occupation approved
building permits for 5,820 settlement units.
A Bitter Reality: 22 per cent of Available Water in
Palestine Purchased from Israeli Water Company
"Mekorot"
Israeli occupation measures contribute to
limiting the ability of the Palestinians to exploit their natural
resources, especially water. Palestinians are forced to
compensate for the water shortage with purchases from the Israeli
water company "Mekorot." In 2017, the quantity of water purchased
for domestic use reached 83 million cubic metres (MCM)(22 per cent of
the
total 375 MCM of water used), in addition to 23.5 MCM flowing
from Palestinian springs, 264.5 MCM from underground wells, and
4.0 MCM of desalinated drinking water.
77 per cent of Available Water from Surface and Ground
Water
Data show that the percentage of surface and ground
water
exploited from available water in the year 2017 was high, with an
average of 77 per cent. It should be noted that the Palestinians have
been denied access to extract from the Jordan River since 1967,
which was estimated at about 250 MCM. On the other hand, the
quantity of water pumped from Palestinian wells in the West Bank
in 2017 was 86 MCM from the Eastern, Western and North-Eastern
aquifers.
The amount of water extracted from the coastal aquifer
for
domestic use was 178.7 MCM in Gaza Strip in 2017, an amount which
jeopardizes its sustainability, as it is known that the yield
should not exceed 50-60 MCM per year. More than 97 per cent of the
water
pumped from the coastal aquifer in Gaza Strip does not meet the
World Health Organization's water quality standards. It also
leads to the depletion of groundwater reserves, which in the
coastal aquifer have reached 19 metres below sea level.
Sources
1. Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics 2018:
Israeli
settlements in the West Bank, 2017. Ramallah-Palestine.
2. Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, 2019.
Revised
estimates based on the final results of Population, Housing and
Establishments Census 2017. Ramallah-Palestine.
3. Israel Central Bureau of Statistics, Statistical
Abstract
of Israel. Jerusalem, 2018.
4. Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission 2019:
Summary
of the most Important Violations in Palestine, 2018. Ramallah-
Palestine
5. Commission of Detainees and Ex-detainees Affairs,
Annual
Report, 2018.
6. Abdullah Al-Hourani Center for Studies and
Documentation,
Israeli Violations 2018, Ramallah 2019.
7. National Gathering of Martyrs' Families, Database of
Martyrs Families, 2019, unpublished data.
![Haut de
page](top.gif)
(To access articles individually
click on
the black headline.)
PDF
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|