CONTENTS
Support Revolutionary Cuba!
Oppose Foreign Interference in Cuban Affairs!
• Cuba
Takes All-Sided Measures to Reopen Its Borders
• CIA
Attempt to Foment "Colour Revolution" Exposed
• Canadian
Official
Circles Repeat Twitter Disinformation
• Role
Played by Twitter and Instagram in
Inciting Fake News about Cuba
• Facebook
Papers
and Subversion in Cuba
- M.H. Lagarde -
The Creation and Actions of
a Counter-Revolutionary
• The
Case of the Organizer of the "March for Change"
• Video
Support Revolutionary Cuba! Oppose
Foreign Interference in Cuban Affairs!
Update
on
the Situation in Cuba
Ottawa
Monday,
November
8 -- 7:00 pm
Montreal
Thursday, November 11 -- 7:00 pm
Click here for
details
|
|
On November 15 Cuba will reopen its economy and
once again permit foreign travel and tourists from
abroad, accompanied by the necessary measures to
ensure the safety of Cubans and foreign visitors.
To facilitate access to travellers, quarantine
requirements upon arrival were eliminated as of
November 7, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
testing at airports as of November 15. In addition
to regular travel documents, tourists will only be
required to carry a vaccination passport or proof
of a negative PCR test result obtained within 72
hours prior to arrival.
Cuba will receive more than 400 weekly flights in
all its airports as of November 15, Transportation
Minister Eduardo Rodríguez said at a press
conference. This includes up to 147 weekly flights
from the United States. The minister explained
that all airlines' requests have been attended to.
Rodríguez explained that the 10 international
airports in Cuba have been conditioned for safe
transit, while optimizing the efficiency of health
measures without neglecting travellers' health. He
highlighted new elements such as the availability
of Internet in all airports, with 30 minutes free
of charge, and pointed out that work is being done
to digitize arrival procedures.
Starting November 15, Cuba will also authorize
the docking of recreational vessels in its
territorial waters. Viazul, a bus company which
connects several tourist destinations in Cuba,
will also resume its services.
More than a million students are scheduled to
return to school on November 15, the same day the
country opens up to international tourism, which
had been limited by flight restrictions and the
closure of hotels and restaurants in much of the
island.
In the downtown and historic areas of Havana,
hotels and restaurants have opened their doors to
attract some of the 100,000 visitors that the
authorities expect by the end of the year, Cuba's
peak tourist season. In the first half of 2021,
the country received just 21.8 per cent of the
tourism captured in the same period of 2020 (1.2
million visitors). By 2022, the government expects
two million tourists, still a far cry from the
four million who came annually before the
pandemic. "We are going for a controlled and
staggered reopening with a guarantee that by
November 15, 90 per cent of the population or
more" will be vaccinated, Tourism Minister Juan
Carlos García said recently.
As of October 30, 7.3 million Cubans out of a
total population of 11.2 million (64.9 per cent of
the population) have been fully vaccinated, with
Cuban-produced vaccines. Recognition of these
vaccines by the World Health Organization is
pending. The authorities plan to immunize the
entire population by the end of the year.
Cuban people stand in defence of the
Revolution in a mass rally in Havana July 17,
2021.
Ample evidence has come to light of the latest
attempt by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) in combination with well-known
counter-revolutionary groups to foment a so-called
colour revolution in Cuba. A first attempt at
inciting anarchy and chaos in the streets of Cuba
to provide a pretext to "warrant" a foreign
invasion "to restore order and democracy," failed
on July 11th when the Cuban leadership and people
united in defence of revolutionary Cuba.
On Monday, November 1, Dr. Carlos Leonardo
Vázquez provided information on the TV news
channel CubaSi on how similar attempts are being
made to undermine the reopening of the Cuban
economy post-pandemic on November 15. He acquired
the information directly as an agent working for
Cuban security services under the name "Fernando."
He exposed the activities of one Yunior García
who claims to head the "Archipiélago collective"
which is the organizer of the so-called "March for
Change" in Cuba on November 15. The evidence shows
these activities are directly linked to U.S.
intelligence agencies, counter-revolutionary
groups and U.S. think-tanks promoting political
subversion.
TML Monthly is providing below a summary
of Dr. Vázquez's account on CubaSi.
Vázquez participated with Yunior García in
training courses for political leaders in the
service of foreign interests. In 2019 they came
together at a workshop sponsored by the U.S.
University of Saint Louis, where the role of armed
forces in a transition process was one of the main
subjects. One of the speakers attending the
meeting was Richard Young, an expert in public
protests as a method of political and social
change. Young referred to the new forms of "civic
activism" to seek to establish "a fundamentalist
and privatizing capitalism."
The TV news program also aired a conversation
between Yunior García and Ramón Saúl Sánchez Rizo,
a terrorist linked to organizations such as Alpha
66, Omega 7, the National Liberation Front of Cuba
and the Coordination of United Revolutionary
Organizations (CORU).
Other disclosures came from Saily González,
spokeswoman for the Archipiélago platform in the
central province of Villa Clara, who acknowledged
support and advice from Omar López, director of
Human Rights of the Cuban American National
Foundation.
Dr. Vázquez specified that the intention of the
November 15 demonstrations is "to set off chaos
and social disobedience." On the grounds of
information which verifies that this is the case,
municipal governments on the island of Cuba have
prohibited the demonstrations as being
unconstitutional.
The Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist)
(CPC(M-L) calls on Canadians and Quebeckers to
make sure MPs and news media in this country are
not used to condone the activities of those whose
aim is to foment violent protests to achieve the
aims of the United States to take over Cuba. They
do this by declaring that the protesters are
Cubans who are fighting for freedom against an
allegedly repressive and corrupt regime. They hide
the source of Cuban scarcity in food, medicines,
building materials, parts and so on, which is the
brutal U.S. blockade which is illegal and a crime
under international law. The fact that the
protests are consciously and invariably organized
to disrupt public order and create anarchy and
violence is kept hidden. Instead the actions of
the security forces in Cuba to maintain law and
order are said to be proof of a repressive,
authoritarian regime and constitute proof that a
foreign invasion is warranted to defend human
rights. CPC(M-L) calls on Canadians and
Quebeckers to inform themselves about this
modus operandi and oppose it.
To read and sign the petition to the Government
of Canada against the U.S. war on Cuba click
here.
Hands Off Cuba!
No Phony "Colour Revolution" Against Cuba!
No Foreign Interference in Cuban Affairs!
Respect Cuban Sovereignty!
Cuba Is a Safe Destination -- Visit Cuba!
Cuba solidarity
action in Montreal, October 31, 2021
Canadian official media are past masters at
repeating counter-revolutionary U.S. propaganda to
promote the need for regime change and the need
for foreign intervention to defend "democracy" and
"human rights."
After the failed U.S.-engineered insurrection in
Cuba on July 11, Global Affairs Canada said on July
12 that it is "closely monitoring the situation in
Cuba" and is "concerned by recent events." A Global
Affairs spokesperson told CBC News via email:
"Canada supports the right to freedom of expression
and assembly and calls on all parties to uphold this
fundamental right. Global Affairs Canada urges all
sides to exercise restraint and encourages all
parties involved in the crisis to engage in peaceful
and inclusive dialogue."
The approach is to cover up that the events were
engineered from abroad with the intent of causing
chaos and a state of anarchy and violence. By
declaring that the government should deal with the
events on the basis of dialogue, they deny that
those fomenting the anarchy and violence are not
interested in having discussion about anything.
Towards this end, Global Affairs Canada vents the
false idea that the events were a matter of
grassroots Cubans speaking out against the
government in acts of political dissent.
On July 13, Prime
Minister Trudeau made a short statement. First he
said, "Canada has always stood in friendship with
the Cuban people," which is true and what everyone
wants Canada to do. But then a pernicious
character was revealed when, instead of opposing
those who seek to interfere in Cuba's internal
affairs, he said: "We have always called for
greater freedoms and more defence of human rights
in Cuba. We will continue to be there to support
Cubans in their desire for greater peace, greater
stability and greater voice in how things are
going."
He should support as much for the Canadian people
before accusing others of not giving their people
a voice in how things are going. Instead, on July
15, the Prime Minister said, "We're deeply
concerned by the violent crackdown on protests by
the Cuban regime. We condemn the arrests and
repression by authorities of peaceful
demonstration."
Again, he should say as much about the RCMP and
police forces in Canada and his own government for
dealing violently with demonstrators and those who
dissent by doing their duty to uphold rights when
the government fails to do so. "We stand, as we
always will, with the people of Cuba who want and
deserve democracy, freedom and respect," Trudeau
said.
So do all Canadians, Mr. Trudeau, but they
do so by defending their right to defend
themselves against foreign interference,
subversion and invasions in defence of the
democracy and freedom they have established for
themselves.
On July 13 CBC News posted an agency image from
U.S. media with the caption: "Poverty and the
pandemic have converged in Cuba, to create
unbearable circumstances that people were
protesting in the capital over the weekend.
They're demanding more freedom, while their
president blames the situation on U.S. sanctions."
Besides repeating twitter lies about the unfolding
events in Cuba, the news item quoted former
Canadian ambassador to Cuba Mark Entwistle noting
that the demonstrations were unusual in that they
are spreading across the country "not led by any
kind of intellectual or cultural elites." "'And
for the first time, they're calling for the
removal of the government,' said Entwistle, who
was ambassador from 1993-97," the CBC wrote.
Like Global Affairs and Trudeau, Entwistle and
the CBC failed to say who precisely, besides the
Biden administration and the NATO allies, was
calling for the removal of the government.
No to Foreign Interference in
Cuba's Internal Affairs!
Hands Off Cuba!
"I have irrefutable evidence that the majority of
users who took part in this campaign were in the
United States and that automated systems were used
to viralize the content, without being penalized
by Twitter," Cuban Minister of Foreign Affairs
Bruno Rodríguez stated on July 13 following the
failed July 11 attempt at fomenting a
counter-revolutionary rebellion in Cuba. Evidence
of this unconventional warfare against Cuba was
irrefutable. Even U.S. official media such as Newsweek
published the evidence of the use of fake accounts
and bots to spread false news about what was going
on in Cuba and incite violence in that country.
Spanish disinformation expert Julián Macías
Tovar, the director of Pandemia Digital, found
that around 2,000 Twitter accounts were created on
July 10 and 11 that used the hashtag #SOSCuba. He
analyzed more than two million tweets using the
hashtag. His research and logs of the tweets and
retweets can be found on Twitter.
Macías Tovar reported that the hashtag was first
used on July 5, with the first tweet coming from
Spain. This account posted over 1,000 tweets on
July 10 and 11. Evidence shows that by using
automated systems posting at the rate of five
retweets per second, the number climbed to 100,000
on July 9, 500,000 on July 10, 1.5 million on July
11 and two million on July 12.
While the first tweets came from Spain, they
involved the Miami mafia, as well as others such
as an individual from the reactionary Argentinian
organization Fundación Libertad known to have
carried out similar campaigns against the former
Bolivian president Evo Morales and the current
president of Mexico Andrés Manuel López Obrador
(AMLO).
Fake images flooded social networks in several
countries, using thousands of newly created
accounts. Instagram alone had some 120,000 photos
using the hashtag. Images from all over the world
were used under the pretext that they were photos
of anti-government protests in Cuba. These
included photos from Egypt during the Arab Spring
in 2011 and Cuba's May Day celebrations in 2018.
Photos of the Cuban people in the streets
defending revolutionary Cuba were also presented
as anti-government protests, and reprinted by
major U.S. media.
Fake news reports were spread including the
absurd claims that Raúl Castro had fled to
Venezuela, that a provincial Communist Party
secretary had been "captured" by protestors, and
that Venezuela would be sending troops to Cuba.
Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel called it "media
terrorism."
"It's clear that there are bots involved in the
conversation about what's going on in Cuba," Sam
Wooley, project director for propaganda research
at the University of Texas at Austin's Centre for
Media Engagement, told Newsweek.
What can be clearly seen is that first protests
were called and orchestrated from the U.S., using
some Cuban artists recruited by the U.S. which has
been pouring millions of dollars into providing
"grants" for Cuban artists. Then false accounts of
the events were constructed and spread through
social media using the fake accounts and bots, and
picked up by the official media in various
countries including Canada. False claims that
people were being killed or "disappeared" were
circulated, followed by acts of vandalism. At the
same time, almost all Cuban public media were
subject to intermittent attacks with denial of
services.
There is widespread agreement among academics who
study social media that Twitter and Facebook are
rife with "influence operations." This refers to
the use of fake accounts and multiple accounts
with one user to create a deluge of tweets and
"shares" through automated systems or bots. This
"engagement" is presented as arising from real
people and as mass participation used to establish
what is "trending."
Not only are fake accounts used to manufacture
"engagement," but followers can be purchased,
either entirely fake ones or by using the names of
real people without their knowledge or consent.
The New York Times reported in 2018 that
as federal and state authorities were
investigating the sellers of artificial followers
and other fraudulent social media engagements,
more than a million followers disappeared from the
accounts of dozens of prominent Twitter users,
including a member of the Twitter board of
directors. The people losing followers had
purchased them from a company called Devumi.
- M.H. Lagarde -
The publication of the so-called Facebook Files,
a compendium of documents published by a
consortium of 17 media outlets, including CNN, the
New York Times and the Washington
Post, once again puts the finger on the
sore spot regarding the role of the hate vending
machine that the popular social network has
become.
The new revelations added detail to the leaks by
former company employee Frances Haugen published
in October 2021 in the Wall Street Journal
and repeated in sessions before the U.S. Congress
and the British Parliament.
It is now known that the company's policy of
putting its profits first when it comes to
disinformation, lack of control and absence of
internal precautionary measures, influenced the
violence of the Trumpist hordes that stormed the
Capitol in Washington on January 6, 2020.
According to the documents, after the U.S.
presidential election of November 2020, the
company fell into neglect and deactivated the
precautionary measures that had been taken to
prevent election day chaos. Many of the workers
who in the months leading up to the elections had
been part of the prevention team against fake news
and hateful content, took leaves of absence or
changed positions, and dozens of adopted rules
were reversed.
The new revelations show that the social network
barely dedicates resources to combat false
information outside the United States, and its
effectiveness is almost nil in developing
countries such as India, currently the country
with the most Facebook users in the world.
A report prepared by the company itself indicates
that in 2020, 84 per cent of the actions against
false information on Facebook and Instagram (owned
by Facebook) occurred in the U.S., despite the
fact that the vast majority of users are outside
the U.S.
Among other information, the "papers" offer more
details about the lack of resources allocated by
the company to eliminate hate speech, and indicate
that two years ago Facebook reduced the time that
human moderators spend reviewing user complaints
regarding hate speech.
But nothing, at least so far, has been said in
the new documents about the use of Facebook as a
media weapon against those nations that are not to
the liking of the U.S. government.
The denunciation of such corporate behavior was
already made a few years ago by another former
employee of the company, Jaron Lanier, in his book
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media
Accounts Right Now. In the chapter entitled
"The Arab Spring" the author notes:
"The Arab Spring was an occasion for hearty
self-congratulation in Silicon Valley. We claimed
it as our glory at the time. 'Facebook Revolution'
and 'Twitter Revolution' were common tropes back
then.
"We gathered in front of big screens watching
kids in Tahir Square in Cairo taking on a despotic
government and we were in love. We celebrated as
ordinary citizens used social media to tell NATO
where to target strikes. Social media put a modern
army at the fingertips of ordinary users."
Although ten years have passed since the Arab
Spring, Facebook's policy in this regard has not
changed much, at least as far as Cuba is
concerned.
This is corroborated by someone who seems to
agree with the use of Facebook as an instrument of
incitement to hatred and terrorism: Cuban blogger
Yoani Sánchez.
According to this so-called expert on the
subject, a character invented during the Bush
administration to serve as a megaphone for
anti-Cuban propaganda on social networks: "When
the protests began in Cuba on July 11, Facebook
accounts and their ability to broadcast live
demonstrations were the key elements for a people
that had been muzzled for more than a century to
find their voice. The confluence that had been
created in cyberspace, in a country where the
right of association is severely limited, broke
the barrier of mistrust and fear that had
paralyzed citizens until then."
And in her commentary published by the German
broadcaster Deutsche Welle, as if to leave
no one in doubt of the subversive role the
Facebook hate machine plays against Cuba, she
adds:
"Social networks and instant messaging services
have remained the fundamental stage of rebellion.
The Archipiélago platform, the main organizer of
the civic march called for November 15, has used
the potential of the digital group to unite more
than 30,000 members. For them, Facebook has been
the only possibility to meet and debate."
The "civic march" to which the also "independent
journalist" alludes, claims to be a new edition of
the "rebellion," that is, of the violent actions
that took place last July 11 in Cuba, called via
Internet by the "voice" of the imperial master
with the purpose, in an opportunistic and cowardly
manner in the midst of a world pandemic, of
increasing and justifying the blockade that the
U.S. has maintained against Cuba for more than
sixty years. Another attempt to implement, at some
point successfully, an Arab Spring on the island.
Their faith in the ability of Facebook algorithms
to hack minds with the merchandise of hate is
shared by the anti-Cuban annexationist mafia of
Miami, which after the events of July 11 has not
ceased to ask President Biden, in addition to a
military intervention on the island, to implement
a plan to offer free Internet to Cubans to
supposedly combat the "censorship" of the "regime"
in Havana.
In reality, since the days of the Iranian Green
Wave, the blogger and her friends in Miami -- with
the help of the "impartial" voracity of profits
from Facebook and other social networks -- dream
of bringing about "regime change" on the island
and the prosperity of the "peaceful democracies"
that today prevail in countries such as Libya and
Syria.
The Creation
and Actions of a Counter-Revolutionary
"Yunior is seeking confrontation with the armed
forces, with MININT," is how "Agent Fernando"
defines the plans of the leader of the
Archipiélago platform, adding that "we are seeing
in Yunior the creation and actions of a
counter-revolutionary."
Material released
by Razones de Cuba reveals the identity
of agent Fernando, from the state security organs,
who participated with Yunior García Aguilera in a
workshop on "The role of the armed forces in a
process of transition," sponsored by the North
American Saint Louis University, on its Madrid
campus.
Carlos Leonardo Vázquez González, a doctor, first
degree specialist in general comprehensive
medicine and specialist in oncology, was for 25
years agent Fernando. "I am a Cuban, a
revolutionary, a Martiano, and most importantly a
Fidelista. I am sitting here today to make this
public denunciation to the people of Cuba so that
they do not allow themselves to be deceived by
leaders created by How-To manuals, because Cuba
will never be taken over by the great enemy to the
North."
On October 12, the Administrative Council of Old
Havana denied the request of citizen Yunior García
Aguilera to hold a march for supposedly peaceful
purposes scheduled for November. Using as a
pretext that it was a civic initiative, conceived
simultaneously for the whole country, he based his
request on article 56 of the Constitution of the
Republic of Cuba.
This article states that "The rights of assembly,
demonstration and association, for lawful and
peaceful purposes, are recognized by the state
provided that they are exercised with respect for
public order and in compliance with the precepts
established by law."
The text of the Constitution also explicitly
states in article 45 that "The exercise of the
rights of individuals is limited only by the
rights of others, collective security, general
welfare, respect for public order, the
Constitution and the law."
The material made public by Razones de Cuba
explains that "The march for change," as this
illegal and counter-revolutionary action is
called, constitutes an attempt to generate a
climate of insecurity, destabilisation and
ungovernability, on the very day that the country
opens its international borders and more than
1,600,000 students return to school.
At the beginning of 2018, Yunior traveled to
Argentina to participate in an event coordinated
by the project "Time for change and the new role
of the armed forces in Cuba." On the website of
the Torcuato Di Tella University, the project's
coordinating centre, the objectives are set out,
among them: "To continue the study of the FAR [Revolutionary
Armed Forces -- Ed.], both through
interviews, analysis of the information
circulating, contacts by email to be able to
adequately transmit possible scenarios and
supposed allies in the future to activists."
According to the website, another of the
objectives is to "cooperate with Cuban actors so
that they can generate activities that allow them
to link up with FAR members open to the processes
of change." Another aim of the course was to
"encourage civil society actors to disseminate
knowledge and activities about the FAR."
According to Razones de Cuba, at this
meeting the leader of Archipiélago spoke with
academics Ruth Diamint and Laura Tedesco, the
architects of the "Dialogue on Cuba" project.
The "staging" that García Aguilera is developing
began much earlier than the playwright would like
to admit. Dr. Carlos Leonardo Vázquez González has
evidence saying, "In September 2019 we
participated in an event on the role of the armed
forces in a transition process."
The participants were all Cubans -- Vázquez
González recounts -- from different sectors:
doctors, journalists, historians. "Yunior García
Aguilera was there at that workshop [...] This
workshop in which I participated, is part of a
project that is being carried out by experts from
different parts of the world. There are many
organizations that are financed by the United
States, such as the National Endowment for
Democracy (NED), the Institute for Freedom (IPL),
People In Need, CADAL [a non-government
organization registered in Buenos Aires
purporting to defend human rights -- Ed.],
whose objective is to overthrow the Cuban
Revolution."
In the course, Richard Young, an expert from the
Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, gave a lecture on the new
forms of civic activism "which translates into the
establishment of a fundamentalist and privatizing
capitalism," according to the material released.
At the same workshop, sponsored by the U.S.-based
Saint Louis University, with a campus in Madrid,
participants met with Felipe González Márquez, who
was president of Spain from 1982 to 1996, leader
of the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE). In
1983, he created so-called anti-terrorist
liberation groups responsible for kidnappings,
torture and assassinations.
Another of those summoned was the
counter-revolutionary Manuel Cuesta Morúa, who
since 2014 has been working for the NED. Cuesta
Morúa orchestrated the provocative plans against
the summits of the Community of Latin American and
Caribbean States (CELAC) in Havana and the Summit
of the Americas in Panama in 2015.
Carlos Leonardo Vázquez recalls that during the
workshop, Yunior told Cuesta that he "admired him
as a political dissident and that they could get
in touch at some point to discuss some issues."
"Yunior García Aguilera's prominence began at the
Saint Louis University, where he emotionally
declared that on his arrival in Cuba he was going
to devote himself to the counterrevolution,"
declared Dr. Carlos in the material provided by Razones
de Cuba.
On the night of November 26, 2020, the
Archipiélago leader posted on his Facebook wall,
"Cuba, and what do we do now?," a phrase that has
an analogy with the words pronounced by the
playwright Václav Havel, defender of the hegemonic
aims of the United States, who said "Something
must be done." The next day [Yunior] appeared in
front of the Ministry of Culture to "call on
creators and intellectuals who are dissatisfied
with the management of the institutions of the
sector to disrespect the law," behind a supposed
artistic position.
In the context of the events of 11 July, Yunior
García went to the Cuban Institute of Radio and
Television to make a 15-minute public
intervention, following the unconventional warfare
manuals applied in Venezuela, Nicaragua and
Yugoslavia.
Another typical element of the so-called soft
coups is the affiliation and activism of people of
culture. The media are also a key part of the
fabric of the coup, fostering discontent and
distrust of the government and its policies, as
well as boosting the morale of the insurgents.
What is a colour revolution? "To provoke chaos
and disobedience in society, as well as to provoke
international organisations to impose sanctions
that could lead to military intervention and the
establishment of an alternative government,"
Vázquez González pointed out.
One of the actors in the current rhetoric of
aggression against Cuba is Ramón Saúl Sánchez
Rizo, a notorious terrorist linked to
organisations such as Alpha 66, Omega 7,
Coordinación de Organizaciones Revolucionarias
Unidas (CORU) and the Frente Nacional de
Liberación de Cuba. In 1982, he was accused of
participating in the assassination attempt against
Raúl Roa Kourí, Cuba's ambassador to the United
Nations.
In early 1995, he joined the naval flotillas of
the organization Cuba independiente y democrática,
which have violated Cuban territorial waters on
many occasions. He is currently president of the
"Democracy Movement." Although the leader of
Archipiélago denies his links with subversive
organizations or agencies financed by the U.S.
government, since 2017, he has been identified by
the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, an
organization directed until March 2021 by William
Joseph Burns, current director of the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA).
Likewise, well-known far-right figures such as
Marco Rubio, María Elvira Salazar and Orlando
Gutiérrez Boronat support the (November 15) march.
On October 12, Yunior García himself acknowledged
to teleSUR his relationship with Timothy Zúñiga
Brown, chargé d'affaires at the Washington Embassy
in Havana, but omitted to mention his links with
Alexander Augustine Marceil, a Cuban Affairs
officer at the U.S. State Department who has
carried out temporary missions in countries in
conflict such as South Sudan, Kenya and Mexico.
Marcelli has visited Cuba three times between 2019
and 2021, and on his arrival in Havana he has met
with members of the internal counterrevolution.
For her part, Saily González Velázquez,
spokesperson for the Archipiélago platform in
Villa Clara acknowledges the support offered by
the Cuban-American National Foundation. In another
interview, she said that "what I am doing is
informing myself with people like Omar López,
other people who are advising us on the subject of
peaceful resistance and non-violent struggle."
It should be noted that Omar López Montenegro is
the human rights director of this foundation,
protector of the terrorists Luis Posada Carriles
and Orlando Bosch Ávila, perpetrators of the
bombing of the Cubana de Aviación plane that
killed 73 passengers, including the youth fencing
team.
"He is calling for a march that he says is
peaceful, but he knows it is not. Because in the
paramilitary workshop where we participated there
were two generals. What Yunior García Aguilera is
looking for is a confrontation between the Armed
Forces and the people, and we will not allow
that," said Dr. Carlos Leonardo Vázquez González.
(To access articles
individually click on the black headline.)
PDF
PREVIOUS ISSUES
| HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|