October 13, 2016
No to the Austerity Agenda! Defend
Rights of
Public Sector Workers and Services They Provide
Nova Scotia Public Sector Workers
Reject McNeil Government's
Anti-Social Austerity Agenda
PDF
Protest against Bill 148 outside Nova Scotia legislature, December
2015.
No
to
the
Austerity
Agenda!
Defend Rights of Public Sector Workers and Services They Provide
• Nova Scotia Public Sector Workers Reject
McNeil Government's Anti-Social Austerity Agenda
• Discussion with Jason MacLean, President of
Nova Scotia Government and General Employees' Union
• Growing Resistance to Quebec Government's
Bill 10
• Effect on New Brunswick of Federal Cuts to
Health Transfers - Interview, Daniel Légère,
President, Canadian Union of Public Employees New Brunswick
Fight for Secure Work
and Higher Wages
• Mass Rally Demands Changes to Ontario Labour
Law
Precarious
Existence
for
Steelworkers
and
Retirees
• Resistance to U.S. Steel's Attacks
• Time for a New Direction and Aim for the
Economy
No to the Austerity Agenda!
Defend Rights of Public Sector Workers and Services They Provide
Nova Scotia Public Sector Workers Reject McNeil
Government's Anti-Social Austerity Agenda
Public sector workers in Nova Scotia are gearing up for
battle
against the anti-social austerity agenda of the Liberal majority
government of Stephen McNeil. Abusing its power, the government is
denying workers their right to negotiate their working conditions,
which are the conditions in which public services are delivered.
The workers are particularly incensed at the passing on
December 18, 2015 of Bill 148, the Public Services
Sustainability Act. This bill, under the hoax of guaranteeing the
sustainability of
public services, attacks those who provide the services. It imposes a
ceiling on wage increases for all provincial public sector
workers of 0 per cent, 0 per cent, 1 per cent
and 1.5 per cent per year
and 0.5 per cent on the last day of the contract. If negotiations
end
up in arbitration, the bill binds the arbitrator to these parameters in
terms of wage increases.
The bill also retroactively ended as of
April 1, 2015 the accruals
of monetary benefit from retirement allowances and sick leave. The
McNeil government has not yet proclaimed the bill saying that it will
do so if negotiations or arbitration suggest that discussions are going
beyond the parameters set by the bill. In other words, the
workers and their unions are supposed to negotiate with a gun to their
head and agree with the attacks of the government, which is also their
employer, or face the full weight of a proclaimed Bill 148.
In this context the Nova Scotia teachers recently voted
down a
tentative agreement that had been reached in September. Teachers oppose
the phony negotiations and blackmail that either they accept an
unacceptable wage offer and deterioration of their working conditions
or face the hammer of the law.
The civil service workers organized with the Nova
Scotia Government
and General Employees' Union (NSGEU) are also considering voting down a
tentative agreement that was reached with the province last November
prior to the passing of Bill 148. In January, the bargaining
committee
for the province's 7,600 unionized civil
servants voted 96 per cent to recommend rejection of the tentative
agreement after the union conducted meetings with the workers across
the province. The passing of the anti-worker Bill 148 was a major
factor in the recommendation to reject. A press release from the
bargaining committee said "the government's heavy-handed
legislative interference" was the cause of this change of mind. Health
care workers who are members of NSGEU are now entering negotiations for
the renewal of their collective agreement. They have also declared that
they want to reach a negotiated settlement that is to their
satisfaction without the sword of Bill 148 hanging over their
heads.
Discussion with Jason MacLean, President of Nova Scotia
Government and General Employees' Union
Workers' Forum recently talked with Jason
MacLean, the
President of NSGEU, about the situation facing its members and the
people of Nova Scotia. Jason denounced the travesty of negotiations
that is being imposed on public sector workers. He explained that
besides the issue of the imposition of a wage ceiling, the attack on
the
retirement allowance was crucial in their minds because it forms part
of their current collective agreement.
"The bill strips our Long
Service Award according to which a
member, upon retirement, is eligible to collect one week's pay per year
of service up to 26 weeks. That is in our collective agreement and
the
employer is trying to take it away from us. Also in Bill 148, they
are
taking the accrual away from the workers who have
accumulated it. Their stop day would be April 1, 2015.
"Essentially, the government is passing [these changes]
and the
government is the employer as well. What they are doing is taking
articles out of the collective agreement by legislation. If we were to
agree and vote on it and say yes, we are good with that deal, we would
be accepting it and we would therefore have no challenge. But if we
were to vote it down, then we could pursue a legal challenge in the
Court, a Charter challenge.
"This bill is a tool that the government is using to
try to strong
arm us into a deal, to make us accept these austerity measures by
taking the deal and lose these articles in our collective agreement
forever. So we believe that this is the better way to go, to defeat
this deal and try to go back to the table. If we cannot go back to the
table, then we
would enter conciliation with the employer and hopefully move on in
arbitration.
"In the meantime the government could go ahead and
proclaim
Bill 148. Meanwhile, we are looking into a legal challenge to
somebody
digging into the collective agreement and taking out articles by
legislation. Those articles have been freely and collectively bargained
over years and years. No one can just come in and say we do not
want them anymore and get what they want."
MacLean explained that the union is about to go across
the province
and present the recommendation to reject the tentative agreement that
was reached under the threat the government would impose a contract
otherwise. The votes are expected to take place from mid to late
November.
He said in conclusion: "What I say about this process
is that the
government has pushed the people to the wall and the people are
standing up for themselves and saying that we are not accepting your
austerity measures. Labour in Nova Scotia is united on this and we are
going to be consulting and working together all the way."
Growing Resistance to Quebec Government's Bill 10
Health care workers demonstrate in Montreal, October 1, 2015 against
Couillard
government's anti-austerity agenda.
Bill 10 attacks the working
conditions and delivery of services
in the health care sector
Workers
across
Quebec
are
holding
actions
against
the deterioration of working
conditions in the health care sector caused by the anti-social
restructuring of the sector by the Quebec Liberal government. Bill 10, An
Act to modify the organization and governance of the health and social
services network, in particular by abolishing the regional agencies
is a major component.
The bill was passed under closure by the Couillard majority government
on February 7, 2015. The law concentrates decision-making powers in the
health care system in the hands of the Minister of Health. It has
reduced the number of network facilities from 182 to 33, whose
governing boards are appointed by the Minister and may be removed by
him at will.
Quebec workers say Bill 10 and the entire
anti-social offensive in
health care has caused further chaos in the sector to the point that
working conditions have become untenable seriously putting the
well-being and safety of workers and patients at risk. Actions are
underway in all regions to expose what is really happening in the
health
care system under the anti-social restructuring, and demand changes.
On October 6, workers
protested the decision of the centrally
appointed board of the Integrated Health and Social Services Centre in
Lanaudière region to centralize medical labs in big urban
centres
resulting in losses of jobs and services across the region.
Actions took place during the summer in many regions.
On the Quebec
North Shore, workers protested the elimination of positions in the
emergency services in Sept-Îles, which has created chaos in the
emergency rooms. In the eastern region of Lower-Saint-Lawrence, health
care workers denounced proposed cuts in the range of $20
million for the area in addition to the $17 million reduction
already
imposed. They said the situation is becoming untenable putting both
patients and workers at risk. Rampant burnout and exhaustion amongst
workers are common. Reductions in funding are extensive in departments
such as Intensive Care with the closing of beds and in
mental health units. In one municipality, the only remaining nursing
position in mental health services was eliminated.
Bill 10 centralizes decision-making in the health care
system away from
those who do the work and into the hands of managers appointed by the
Minister. Their positions are dependent on the continuing benevolence
of the Minister who demands they behave like CEOs in the private sector
with the bottom line as the sole concern. To reduce salaries without
consideration of the effect on the provision of services and public
expertise, these CEOs are charged with centralizing administration
through the elimination of thousands of positions in finance, payroll
services, procurement and other sectors.
The
government is also planning attacks on health care professionals and
technicians. One example is the Optilab Project which is about
centralizing the medical labs across Quebec to eliminate hundreds of
jobs. Minister of Health Gaétan Barette has referred several
times to a
so-called over-consumption of lab tests, saying that doctors,
especially family physicians, are prescribing too many scans, x-rays,
blood tests etc, which according to the Minister are useless. Minister
Barette said in this regard that family physicians generally speaking
spend too much time doing medical checkups and preventive medicine
rather than focusing on people who are having "real medical problems."
The Optilab project relies on the most expensive technology offered by
the specialized private enterprises in lab technology funneling health
care money into their private interests. With this centralization
favouring private companies, the lab services currently available in
hospitals are being reduced to the minimum and positions of lab workers
slashed.
Bill 10 has also centralized youth centres under
the direct
management of the new Integrated Health and Social Services Centres.
Workers in many youth centres recently denounced the reduction of
services for youth, which they say has had a serious impact on their
working conditions and the well-being of the youth. Staffing is totally
inadequate resulting in out of control workloads and a rise of acts of
violence against staff.
Workers also report that with Bill 10, their
previous limited
ability to deal with issues with local authorities has gone. They now
have to deal with people with no power called coordinators. Workers
call them "mailboxes" because all they do is receive reports and
complaints, and workers receive no response. They are told their issues
are being studied but no space or avenues exist to discuss issues and
make sure things are done.
One of the main features of
Bill 10 is to channel all resources
into the medical services that are the most profitable for the global
monopolies. Accompanied with reduced investments in health care, this
trend takes the system further away from providing comprehensive health
care for all. The bill also restricts the say and control of
health care workers over the work they do and the problems that arise.
The result is both chaos and paralysis in the system.
The government considers having organized workers and
unions in the
system and any worker say or control to be an "administrative burden."
Bill 10 imposes restructuring of trade union affiliation across
the
health care sector interfering in workers' right to organize themselves
according to their own thinking, views and needs. The centralizing of
health care institutions into basically one mega institution per region
requires that only one trade union can be certified per institution to
represent workers in each of the four prescribed categories: (1)
nurses, (2) ancillary services and trades, (3) office workers and
administrative technicians and professionals, and (4) health care
professionals and
technicians.
The government demands health care workers vote for new
trade union
affiliation according to the categories outlined in Bill 10, which
is
deliberately causing utmost disruption within workers' organizations
and in their relations with each other. Workers are denouncing this
government interference in their union affairs and want it
stopped.
Effect on New Brunswick of Federal Cuts
to Health Transfers
- Interview, Daniel Légère,
President, Canadian Union of
Public Employees New Brunswick -
Workers' Forum: In a recent joint
communiqué of
the New Brunswick Council of Hospital Unions (NBCHU) and CUPE New
Brunswick, you write that you are worried the federal government is
underfunding health care to accelerate privatization in the provinces.
Can you elaborate?
Daniel Légère: Health
care
costs,
certainly
in
New
Brunswick,
which has the fastest aging
population are increasing. Pressures on the health care system are
increasing. With that comes the cost of the delivery of the service to
the people of New Brunswick. Not increasing the scale from 3 per cent
to 6 per cent will significantly impact that. [Federal transfers will
drop in 2017 from a guaranteed six per cent annual increase to funding
tied to economic performance with a three per cent minimum -- Ed.
Note ]
We are very concerned that
we will start seeing the encroachment of
private health care in our province, which leads to a two-tier system.
Those with the ability to pay will get fast-tracked into the private
system and be able to jump the queue.
The other concern around that is when you have
privatization you
have a drain of human resources. Every jurisdiction I think has a
problem, certainly in Eastern Canada, in recruiting new doctors and
keeping new doctors in our communities, especially in the rural
communities. Right now in New Brunswick, there are many thousands of
people who don't have a family doctor. If privatization were to compete
for those human resources, it would just aggravate that problem.
In New Brunswick, we are living in a situation where we
have long
waiting lists for elective surgeries. One factor for that, although not
the only one, we are starting to see in New Brunswick a demographic
shift from the northern part of the province to the southern part of
the province, especially the Francophone communities. We are calling
that the second deportation. Young people are leaving the Acadian
Peninsula and moving to Moncton and Dieppe where there are more
opportunities for employment, which puts an extra strain on the health
care system. There are population booms in our urban centres.
Then there is the problem of human resources, which I
have already
mentioned, to have the people to deliver the health care system. The
third part of this is funding. We have these three problems -- funding,
long waiting lists and shortage of doctors. The decision on transfers
will compound these problems. It will certainly compound the
problem with the human resources as well as the financial resources.
We are also very concerned with the direction that our
provincial
government is going in welcoming with open arms a pay-for-blood plasma
clinic that is going to go into Moncton. We are concerned on a number
of levels that it will erode our public blood service system and is a
move to privatization. Certainly blood products are part of our
health care system, we are concerned with that, we are trying to put
the spotlight on it for the public; why this is the wrong thing to do
in our opinion. Right now our blood collection system is a voluntary
system. The government is proposing that a private company will pay
donors for blood plasma in New Brunswick. It will erode our public
blood system. This company has been known to set up in areas where it
can prey on society's most vulnerable.
Also we spent millions of dollars on the Krever
inquiry. [The
Commission of Inquiry into the Blood System in Canada that was
established by the federal government in 1993 -- Ed. Note
] We
all remember the tainted blood scandals back in the 1980s. There
were
five principles that came out of the report. One of them
was not to pay for blood. It should be a strictly voluntary system.
Fight for Secure Work and Higher Wages
Mass Rally Demands Changes to Ontario Labour Law
Five thousand workers gathered at Queen's Park in
Toronto on
October 1 to demand Ontario labour law favour working people,
particularly marginalized workers in sectors referred to as precarious.
Many workers travelled by bus from across the province -- from Ottawa,
Alexandria, Thunder Bay, Sudbury, Barrie, Windsor, St.
Catharines, Cambridge, Hamilton and many other communities. Contingents
marched to Queen's Park from the Steelworkers' Hall and Allan Gardens.
Participants included workers from hotels, grocery
stores,
libraries, airports and educational institutions who are facing
contracted-out and part-time work with few legal protections or means
to enforce standards where they do exist. The workers are confronting
labour laws that defend private monopoly interests and the financial
oligarchy. In
many cases, existing labour law does not offer workers even minimum
protections. Many of the workers present were youth and recent
immigrants employed in those sectors of the economy where they are most
vulnerable.
Speakers demanded that the Ontario government's ongoing
Changing
Workplaces Review result in laws that protect the most vulnerable
workers and help bring an end to abuses and attacks.
One speaker related his experience organizing in the
food
processing industry where workers struck for 22 months before
reaching
an agreement with their employer. Others spoke of the experiences of
hotel workers working in union versus non-union hotels, of seniors
increasingly forced into precarious work because they cannot afford
to retire, and the legal obstacles faced in organizing among part-time
college workers.
Participants' placards and
banners expressed Ontarians' demands for
governments to affirm workers' rights instead of facilitating their
violation. In addition to calls for a $15 minimum wage were
demands for
paid sick days, legislation to ban the use of replacement workers, and
to allow card-check certification to reduce employer
interference in unionization drives. Demands included standards for
mandatory rest time between shifts, province-wide standards for
benefits and job security for part-time, contract and full-time workers
alike, and an end to contract flipping.[1]
One serious issue raised was the need for governments not only
to have laws on the books protecting workers, but to enforce these laws
proactively.
Women from Bangladeshi Community Speak Out for
Secure Work and Higher Wages
A contingent of fifty people, mostly Bangladeshi
immigrant
women working at low-paid, precarious jobs were mobilized to
participate in the rally at Queen's Park by the East Danforth Community
Chapter of Unifor (Unifor-EDCC) and the South Asian Women's Rights
Organization (SAWRO).
Below are excerpts of the speech delivered to the
Unifor
rally at Allen Gardens by Shapla Yesmine, the President of Unifor-EDCC
and her co-speaker Husna Sweet, Secretary/Treasurer of the Chapter.
"We represent a community of
immigrant women who have been pushed
into low-wage, precarious jobs on the margins of the labour market. Our
community women want to end our marginalization. We want changes to the
Employment Standards Act to force employers to respect our human
dignity and rights as workers. We want real jobs
and living wages -- starting with increasing the minimum wage
to $15
per hour...."
"Immigrants do not leave their homes and families to
come to Canada
to live in poverty like outcasts. When I came here from Bangladesh I
expected to find a job at standard Canadian wages and to work hard at
that job so my family could enjoy a Canadian standard of living. But
that is not the reality for many newcomers.
"I have worked for 12 years at minimum wage jobs
in retail and
light manufacturing. Year after year I have had to work 60 hours a
week
at three different jobs just to survive -- always struggling to pay the
rent and pay the bills and no time for family life. Working and living
like this is an inhuman stress on me and my family. It
is not a human life. It is not what I expected when I came to Canada.
"Many women in our community are in the same situation
as me or
worse. Our community people are vulnerable to super-exploitation by
employers because we are new entrants into an oversupplied labour
market. As well, we are suffering from the increased use of part-time
work, temp agencies and two-tier wage and benefit systems by
employers. All of this gives employers the power to trample our
workplace rights and human dignity. Even the minimum legal employment
standards are violated with impunity. Government action is needed to
restrict employers from using their increased market power to abuse
workers.
"Government action required
to improve the lives of our community
people includes measures:
- to raise the minimum wage to a living wage
with an immediate increase to $15 per hour
- to restrict
employers' use
of part-time work and how part-time work is scheduled
- to restrict
employers' use of temp agencies and how temp
agencies operate
- to require employers to give the same pay and
benefits to workers doing the same job
- to rigorously enforce the
Employment Standards Act...."
"This action today shows that the union movement and
our community
people both recognize that we have to fight together against employers
pushing to turn Canada into a low-wage economy. Union workers are
fighting to defend Canadian standard wages and working conditions and
we precarious workers are fighting to achieve Canadian
standards.
"We Are All in this Together! The People United Will
Never Be Defeated!"
Note
1. "Contract flipping" is where a company
changes contracted-out service providers every few years often
resulting in job losses, lower wages and worse working conditions.
Collective agreements are usually scrapped whenever contracts flip,
meaning that workers must organize again and renegotiate their
contracts. This was among the concerns of the contingent of workers
from Pearson International Airport who participated in the rally.
Precarious Existence for Steelworkers and
Retirees
Resistance to U.S. Steel's Attacks
Protest at USS Gary Works, August 26, 2016.
The workplace death of Jonathan Arrizola at U.S. Steel's
Gary
Works occurred just
weeks after steelworkers staged protests against worsening working
conditions. Firings and
demotions of maintenance workers and outsourcing of their work had
provoked militant
demonstrations at the end of August and into September.
At Gary Works, U.S. Steel had fired 75 maintenance
workers and
demoted an additional 200 to work gangs with pay cuts
between $7 and $9
per hour. Steelworkers say the ultimate goal of the company's
anti-worker campaign is to replace current maintenance workers with
outsourced workers who do not belong to
the local unions at the plant, receive lower wages and benefits, and
are not members of the pension plan. Steelworkers report that hundreds
of maintenance work orders are going unfilled and little preventative
maintenance is being done. This led to serious safety concerns that
something tragic would happen.
Gary Works' steelworkers
and their allies responded to the attacks
on their rights and security with militant demonstrations and other
actions. Hundreds of steelworkers gathered on several occasions in
downtown Gary and marched in determined fashion to the gates of Gary
Works to express their opposition.
Steelworkers express the sentiment that without staunch
resistance
to layoffs, outsourcing and other attacks on their rights, U.S. Steel
will intensify its anti-worker actions throughout its empire. They are
determined to stop it. The workplace death of fellow steelworker
Jonathan Arrizola saddens all workers and gives more urgency to their
resistance to attacks on their rights and well-being.
Demonstration outside Gary Work of USS, August 26, 2016.
Time for a New Direction and Aim for the Economy
Who is responsible? What is to be
done?
A battle of ideas has erupted between the steel barons
and
steelworkers over who is responsible for the crisis in the steel sector
and what is to be done. The steel sector has to be revitalized with
steelworkers allowed to work and produce the social wealth necessary
for the working people's collective existence and to meet the general
interests
of society. Laid-off workers and retirees must not be left to fend for
themselves. The modern economy of socialized industrial mass production
is so productive the rich even accuse it of over-production yet many
working people are left wanting and even destitute. The problem lies
with the outmoded direction and aim of an economy that serves
the rich at the expense of the working people who produce the wealth.
Steelworkers and retirees are under assault throughout
the U.S.,
Canada and Mexico. The steel barons and their governments refuse to
accept responsibility for the crisis. In Canada, both U.S. Steel Canada
and Essar Steel Algoma are under the fraud of bankruptcy protection
where their jobs, pensions, benefits and production facilities are
considered fair game for rich predators. In the U.S., layoffs are
extensive as the sector reels from one crisis to another.
U.S. Steel laid
off 1,600 steelworkers at its Granite City Works
last December and January, joining 400 others who lost their jobs
as
far back as April last year. Granite City is a community of Greater
Saint Louis. USW Locals 50 and 1899 report that most
unemployment
benefits for their members have run out and
many have also lost their health benefits. U.S. Steel has not given any
hope that the plant will soon reopen if at all. With industrial jobs
scarce in Saint Louis and government social programs virtually
non-existent many steelworkers have been forced to seek charity to keep
their families alive. This desperate situation is unforgiveable in a
developed
country with extensive socialized industrial mass production. Stories
of hardship abound but simply exchanging such stories does not change
the grave situation and real pain that is felt or give rise to a new
pro-social direction. For that to occur, the working people need to
organize and fight to make it happen.
The North American steel barons and their governments
are in charge
yet they deny all responsibility for the crisis. Like snivelling
cowards that refuse to face up to what they have done, they point
fingers at some Chinese officials tens of thousands of kilometres away
as the culprits. The steel barons and their representatives refuse to
accept
responsibility even though they have been in control all along. What
cowards they are who refuse to be held to account for the damage they
have caused to the working people and the social and natural
environment, and to accept that pro-social change is necessary and
overdue. They are only interested in defending their class privilege
and control of
their social wealth and empires. They want to wipe their hands of the
problems they have caused for retirees, workers and their communities
and environment. The only solutions they propose, which are not
solutions, are to demand concessions from working people and to attack
the Chinese, which is all very convenient if not farcical, cruel and a
recipe for further disasters. The steel barons are the ones in charge
in the U.S., Canada and Mexico, not the Chinese steel barons. If a
solution is to be found, it has to be found at home, here in the
countries of North America and not in some far off land where we have
neither power to change the situation nor any business interfering in
their lives
and politics.
Solutions begin at home in our own countries and
economies. The
problems lie with the narrow direction of the economy that serves the
rich and their insatiable greed at the expense of the working people.
This must change! The time is now for the working people to put their
stamp on their economy with a fight for a new direction that stops
enriching the few at the expense of the many and begins to serve and
guarantee the needs and well-being of the working people throughout
their lives.
Stop Paying the Rich! Increase
Investments in Social
Programs!
Time to Change the Direction of the Economy from Enriching the
Few to
Serving the Working People, the Ones who Produce the Social
Wealth!
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: office@cpcml.ca
|