August 13, 2020 - No. 54
The
Need to Enforce Rights
Accountability
Is a
Serious Concern for Workers
- Pierre
Chénier -
Nova Scotia
• Demand for Public
Inquiry into Northwood Tragedy - Interview, Jason
MacLean
Quebec
• Longshore Workers at
Port of Montreal Launch General Strike
• Speaking Out on the
Death of a Montreal Health Worker - Pierre
Soublière
British
Columbia
• Defend the Rights of
Seasonal Agricultural Workers! - Brian Sproule
and
Barbara Biley
• Take Immediate Action
to Stop the Forced Isolation of Foreign Farm
Workers - Radical Action with Migrants in
Agriculture
• Hospitality Workers
Continue to Demand that Their Jobs Be Protected
Britain
• Mass Rallies Put
Forward Demands of Health Care Workers
The Need to Enforce Rights
- Pierre Chénier -
Workers are
seriously concerned about the lack of accountability on the part of
governments at all levels for what is happening to the people. There
can be no doubt that decisions that governments have taken and are
taking have created the conditions for the dramatic and tragic impact
of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health and safety of
the people. Thirty years of anti-social offensive in health care and
social services -- with massive cutbacks, increased privatization,
further concentration of decision-making power in ministerial hands and
the marginalization and exclusion of the experience and opinions and
demands of frontline workers, have wrecked the capacity of the health
care system to face the COVID-19 pandemic. The tragedy at Northwood
Manor in Nova Scotia is one such example. When governments establish
inquiries and commissions to look into the tragedies that are
happening, they are doing so behind closed doors so as to ensure that
they do not look into the heart of the matter. Such inquires consider
the first-hand experience, proposals and opinions and the voice of
frontline workers as an impediment to their aim which is to hold onto
the power to make all the decisions not in the interest of the people
but in the service of narrow private interests.
Workers reject this state of affairs and are
insisting that open public discussion take place in which the causes
and solutions of the problems are put on the table and publicly
examined. They do not accept so-called inquiries being used as
instruments to block the people from having a decisive say in all the
affairs that affect them. It is
absurd to claim that frontline workers who keep the health care system
functioning against all odds and at great sacrifices for themselves
should be deprived of decision-making power in the system. The same
thing applies to all sectors in which workers keep producing goods and
services that allow society to function in this terrible time of
crisis.
This is why workers are firmly opposing the "business as usual" dictate
of the ruling elite, the "going back to normal" because that "normal"
was precisely what made the crisis much worse and much more difficult
to overcome and is threatening to make the situation even worse than it
is.
Workers' Forum is putting its
pages at the disposal of the workers to make their voices heard, to
smash the silence on their conditions and on their struggle for their
rights and for the rights of all, and to open the path to solving the
crises that are erupting in a way which favours the people.
Nova Scotia
- Interview, Jason MacLean -
Jason MacLean is President of the Nova
Scotia Government and General Employees' Union (NSGEU).
Workers' Forum:
NSGEU is firm in its demand for a public inquiry into the disaster that
took place at the Northwood nursing home in Halifax and into Nova
Scotia's long-term care system. Can you tell us more about this demand?
Jason MacLean:
As far as Northwood is concerned, we must not forget that it is central
to Nova Scotia's long-term care system. Northwood has been considered
the shining star of long-term care in the province. It's the biggest
long-term care facility east of Montreal. It was looked upon positively
as the place where people
would end up going for long-term care. It is central geographically
because it's located in the central region, in Halifax, and is also
central figuratively because it was considered as the standard. And
this is where we had this tragedy whereby 53 residents lost their lives
in the spring.
We must learn what mistakes were made, where we
had gaps in the whole system. We are also going to learn that we need
to invest more into long-term care and the only way for us to be able
to
move along there, because it is going to cost money, is for everybody
to be brought along into this whole pandemic and to look back at what
decisions
were made leading into it. But also, if we do that, we are going to set
a framework for the future, so that other governments won't make the
kinds of decisions that led to what happened at Northwood. It did not
just happen out of thin air. It happened because of certain decisions
and of course, because of COVID-19. Nova Scotians need to be part
of that because they need to embrace reform in long-term care. It is
only going to happen if they bring people along in the review, instead
of holding it behind closed doors and then making decisions with nobody
understanding why changes are being made or if they are actually going
to have an impact in improving the situation. Our demand is
all about a public inquiry.
WF: Is there
a motion at this time amongst the people of Nova Scotia to hold such a
public inquiry?
JM: NSGEU
has sought a public inquiry since the beginning. We were actually the
first group to ask for a public inquiry. And then you even had the CEO
of Northwood saying that she is open to having a public inquiry. Then
there's the 53 families of the people we lost at Northwood, who are
also demanding a public inquiry.
We believe there's an upswell of support for a public inquiry amongst
Nova Scotians, especially after they realized the power they do have in
demanding an open public inquiry into the mass shooting that happened
in Portapique.[1]
That changed the mind of the federal and the provincial government,
which finally agreed to hold a public inquiry. If Nova Scotians want it
to happen, it will happen.
WF: NSGEU's
report Neglecting Northwood says that what happened
at Northwood is a
failure of public policy? What is the failure according to you?
JM: Many
reports on long-term care have been written over the years and the
recommendations coming out of them were not followed. Besides, in 2015
and 2017 there were budgets with cuts in them to long-term care
facilities. In the entire seven years that Stephen McNeil has been in
power, no new long-term care beds have been
created, even though the acuity level of people in long-term care and
those in hospitals have both increased. In home care, people are kept
in their homes longer, with the acuity level rising there as well. So
public policy has dictated that people are sicker longer in their homes
instead of getting good care in long-term care facilities. Public
policy
has been offside for quite some time and we are seeing it now with this
pandemic that has casualties attached to it, as we have seen at
Northwood. That is tragic.
Public policy has been driven by budgets. The
current government was not willing to invest in long-term care and that
was to the detriment of people who need it. Our population is not
getting any younger and more people are going to need long-term care
facilities.
WF: Do you
want to say something in conclusion?
JM: We are
stuck in a pandemic. Things happened. Governments made decisions. What
we are trying to do is to outline that we cannot continue in long-term
care the way we have for the last 10 years. Investments in long-term
care have deteriorated. We have to improve the system. It's not about
who's right and who's wrong.
It's about having a good level of care for our seniors because they
deserve it.
Note
1. On
April 18 and 19, a lone gunman dressed as an RCMP officer went on a
13-hour shooting rampage that began in the small rural community of
Portapique in Nova Scotia. Twenty-two people were killed, and the
gunman was shot dead by the police. For weeks, while the families of
the
victims and the people of the province demanded a public inquiry into
the mass shooting, both the federal and the provincial governments
stalled, finally announcing not a public inquiry but an independent
review by a three person panel. As public pressure mounted against
them, both the federal and provincial governments finally acceded to
the
demands and announced a public inquiry into the mass shooting.
Quebec
On Monday morning, August 10, longshore workers
at the Port of Montreal launched a general, unlimited strike as
negotiations with their employer, Maritime Employers Association are
deadlocked. The collective agreement of the 1,100 workers, who are
members of Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Local 375, expired
at the
end of 2018.
One of the employer's main demands is that
longshore workers accept untenable working hours, as the workload at
the port has drastically increased over the years. In an interview with
the press, CUPE Local 375 negotiator Michael Murray explained:
"You Will Never Break Me"
|
"The longshoremen work 19 days out of 21
year-round. At one time, these schedules were feasible because the
traffic in the port of Montreal allowed for paid days off within the 19
days. The longshoremen have to be available 24 hours a day, including
weekends. The other side of the coin is that we have job security. The
arrival of record
year after record year in the port of Montreal has meant that the
volume of work has increased and our people now work continuously 19
days out of 21. We have a new generation of longshoremen, who are young
men and women who need to be taken care of, and they will not be able
to endure this situation for years to come.
"We are looking at rearranging the hours where the
employer would have some flexibility and our people would have a better
work/life balance, and we've put forward a proposal that would achieve
that. The employer agreed with the concept of rescheduling hours to
provide flexibility for themselves but for the rest, they say they
won't accept
our proposal unless it is a net-zero proposal, one that is no cost to
the employers. These are multi-billion dollar companies operating in
the port. The small ones are billionaires. When we go from record years
to record years, they cannot tell us at the negotiating table that our
demands must be a net-zero. Our union has always fought for our
workers, We want to improve the quality of life of our workers and at
the same time we are ready to examine the employers' demand for
flexibility. The employer wants to pick and choose what is convenient
for them. That is why we are putting economic pressure on shipping
companies."
One of the factors that pushed the workers to
launch the strike is the fact that during the short-term legal walkouts
that the workers have organized over the past six weeks the employer
has retaliated by unilaterally modifying the working conditions of the
workers, cutting overtime rates. The union also denounces the use of
scabs by the
employer to crush their strike.
Workers' Forum fully supports
the just struggle of the longshore workers for their rights and calls
upon all workers to stand firmly with them.
The Port of Montreal is the second largest port in
Canada, after the Port of Vancouver, a diversified transshipment centre
that handles all kinds of goods, containerized and non-containerized
cargo, liquid bulk and dry bulk. The only container port in Quebec, it
is a destination port served by the largest shipping lines in the
world. It is also an
intermodal hub with its own rail network dockside directly connected to
Canada's two national rail networks, Canadian National Railway and
Canadian Pacific Railway. The Montreal Port Authority (MPA) also
operates a Cruise Terminal and a Port Centre. According to the MPA, the
port generates close to $2.6 billion yearly in Canadian
GDP.
- Pierre
Soublière -
Thong Nguyen
|
Thong Nguyen was a 48-year-old father and orderly
who worked at the emergency ward of Jean-Talon Hospital in Montreal. He
was infected with the COVID-19 virus in May and died on June 11. The
Labour Standards, Equity and Occupational Health and Security Board
(CNESST) filed a report on his death which was not made public
but the newspaper La Presse was allowed to view it.
The report does not establish that Thong Nguyen contracted the virus
while on duty, in spite of the fact that it was determined that he had
worked in all three areas of the hospital handling COVID-19 cases. It
also asserts that other
orderlies told the CNESST inspector that during the pandemic they had
no training on
the correct measures to take in light of the pandemic and that there
was a regular lack of protective masks. In spite of acknowledging this,
the inspector asserts that "according to documents given to her by the
employer, several training courses and procedures were established to
protect the workers and prevent the propagation of the COVID-19."
She claims that the workers interrogated could not tell her the
"precise chronology of events" regarding the work environment in the
weeks prior to the worker being declared positive for COVID-19. She
therefore concludes that no corrective measures are required on the
part of the hospital in question.
This assessment is being soundly criticized by
Thong Nguyen's family as well as by associated unions. Doctor Lan
Nguyen is Thong Nguyen's cousin and spokesperson for the family. She
says she is extremely disappointed by the superficiality of this report
which basically asserts that everything is fine and that nothing needs
to be improved.
"The state is doing everything possible to recruit new orderlies but is
making no effort to pinpoint the shortcomings so as to understand how
to better protect them," she said.
Alexandre Paquet, the President of the Union of
Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre (CIUSSS)
workers of Montreal North-CSN writes: "Thong Nguyen died while waging a
daily fight on the ground against COVID-19. Yet, the CNESST is not
suggesting any corrective measures in its report. As if it is normal to
lose your
life while doing your job and as if the system is just fine." He adds:
"This ruling is sending a very bad message to the effect that if you
are infected with COVID-19 and you die while doing your job, you may
very well not be compensated. Your family will be left on its own, in
financial insecurity."
Jeff Begley, President of the Federation of Health
and Social Services (FSSS-CSN), stated: "When we see more than 13,600
health workers were infected in the first wave, that is a problem.
Unfortunately, since the beginning of the pandemic, the CNESST claims
to simply be following the recommendations of Public Health. And yet,
the
casualties among these workers show that these recommendations are not
enough to protect the personnel."
The fact that the government and its institutions
are not actively seeking to get to the bottom of why health workers --
as well the elderly -- were infected in such great numbers, nor what
are the circumstances surrounding deaths such as that of Thong Nguyen,
is both callous and socially irresponsible. It is totally unacceptable
that workers are
treated with such disrespect and that their demands and those of their
families and unions to correct this situation, especially in case of a
resurgence of COVID-19, are continually ignored by the government and
its
institutions. The dignity and integrity of health workers and their
patients is at the heart of the health system that the people want and
need and
raising our voices and pushing in that direction is an integral part of
transforming the situation so as to attain a health system and work
environment fit for human beings.
British Columbia
- Brian Sproule and Barbara
Biley -
Several temporary foreign workers at the Krazy
Cherry Fruit Company in Oliver in the Interior of British Columbia
tested positive for COVID-19 in July causing the Interior Health
Authority to declare an outbreak and issue an order stopping 36 migrant
workers and 9 other individuals on the farm from leaving the property.
The infected
workers were moved to a hotel where they were quarantined.
Temporary foreign workers have provided evidence
that living and working conditions on the farm are putting them at risk
of COVID-19 transmission. On July 17 CBC News posted a video taken by a
worker showing living conditions at the farm. Footage shows a bedroom
shared by four men. One of the beds was used by one of the COVID-19
stricken workers who was, at the time of the video, in isolation. Black
plastic bags containing his possessions were still in the room. The
beds in the room are barely a metre apart and bedrooms are separated by
hanging blankets. The video showed a nearly empty fridge. Workers are
not allowed to leave the farm to shop for food.
Many voices are being raised about the treatment
of migrant farm workers in British Columbia. An article which appeared
in the Tri-City News (covering Coquitlam, Port
Coquitlam, and Port
Moody) on June 27, 2020 reported that Berenice Diaz Ceballos, the
Mexican Consul General in Vancouver has called for migrant workers from
Mexico
to be afforded the same rights as Canadian workers and for improved
oversight by the provincial and federal governments of conditions on
the province's farms. Well over a thousand migrant workers have been
infected
with COVID-19 while working in Canada this year and three in Ontario
have died. The paper reports that the Consul General visited
more than 350 of the 550 farms in BC which employ Mexican workers and
said that "Forty per cent have substandard housing" and that she
described housing facilities covered in trash, infested with
cockroaches and with no mattresses for the workers to sleep on. She
said that in some cases farmers have installed padlocks on the outside
of the
only exit of a bunk house. "If there's an emergency, there's a
fire, they will be dead immediately," the Consul General said.
Workers are crammed into minivans for
transportation to and from the fields. Bullying and harassment of the
workers are common in order to silence them from speaking out. Threats
of deportation are held over their heads. Two workers at Bylands
Nursery (site of a major COVID-19 outbreak in April affecting 23
workers) in West Kelowna
were fired and deported to Mexico after representatives of the advocacy
organization Radical Action with Migrants in Agriculture (RAMA) visited
them to bring food and clothing on June 28. The workers had completed
their mandatory 14 day quarantine after starting work at Bylands on May
27 and there was no outbreak at the farm at the time,
the earlier outbreak having been declared over on May 21. Bylands has
arbitrarily decreed that migrant farm workers are not permitted to
leave the property or have visitors, a restriction that does not apply
to any other workers.
Reached at her home in Mexico, Erika Zavala, one
of the deported former Bylands workers stated "Workers simply seeking
to support their families deserve dignified, fair and equal treatment."
She added "Many employers believe that by giving us work, we belong to
them and they can do with us what they want." RAMA activist Amy
Cohen, who was one of the advocates who visited the workers on June 28,
told CBC News on July 22 that RAMA is concerned that the policy of no
visitors and no leaving the employer's premises for the duration of
employment is a human rights violation. "It is discriminatory and
unfair as the restrictions only apply to temporary foreign workers
and not other Bylands employees."
Bylands isn't the only employer of temporary
foreign workers to restrict community access. Two of the largest fruit
growing farms in the Okanagan, Coral Beach Farms and Jealous Fruits,
forbid migrant workers from leaving their properties or receiving
visitors. "We feel like prisoners," one worker told RAMA, adding,
"Canadians are
allowed to go
buy groceries at the store, go to church, go to the park. Why aren't
we?"
On July 28, RAMA issued an appeal to members of
the
community to contact Bylands, Coral Beach Farms and Jealous Fruits
calling on them to allow community access and visitation rights to
temporary foreign workers once their mandatory 14-day quarantine period
has expired. The appeal also asks people to contact Minister of Health
Adrian
Dix and Minister of Labour Harry Bains. RAMA is calling for the
establishment of an investigation and appeals process for any worker
who is terminated.
Workers' Forum joins migrant
farm workers and advocates and allies across the country in demanding
that the rights of migrant workers be enforced and that they be granted
permanent resident status. These workers play an essential role in
providing Canadians and others with the food we need and Canada must
guarantee them
dignified and healthy working and living conditions and health care at
a Canadian standard.
- Radical Action with
Migrants in Agriculture -
In early July, Erika Zavala and Jesus Molina, two
Mexican temporary foreign workers were fired by Bylands Nurseries in
West Kelowna and repatriated three days later. They were fired because
they violated their employer's policy not to leave the farm site or
have visitors even though they were not in their 2 weeks of quarantine.
They
were visited by two members of RAMA who brought them clothing and
culturally-appropriate food while following all recommended physical
distancing guidelines as outlined by the province of BC.
Bylands Farms is
not the only employer of SAWP
workers that is restricting the ability of migrant workers to have
visitors and access communities to purchase essential items or access
essential services. Some of the largest employers of SAWP workers in
the Okanagan (such as Coral Beach Farms and Jealous Fruits) have stated
publicly that
they will be restricting their foreign workers' access to local
communities.
Workers from Coral Beach and Jealous Fruits have
been in contact with RAMA members and other community advocates
expressing that they feel they are being illegally held on the farm
without any access to local communities. "We feel like prisoners", one
worker told RAMA, "Canadians are allowed to go buy groceries at the
store, go to
church, go to the park -- why aren't we?"
The forced isolation of temporary foreign
farmworkers after their quarantine period by employers such as Bylands,
Jealous Fruits, and Coral Beach must be stopped immediately. These
racist and discriminatory actions violate the human rights of these
essential workers and is detrimental to their health and wellbeing as
well as that of the local
communities as they erect barriers for workers to report symptoms
directly to health care personnel and access supports from local
communities.
Call to Action: Call or email Bylands, Coral
Beach, and Jealous Fruits.[1]
Note
1. For
information on contact information for these employers and government
officials and tips on what to say, visit the RAMA website here.
Unite Here Local 40, which represents 6,000 of
the
50,000 hospitality workers in BC, has announced plans to hold five
day long fasts in front of the BC Legislature from August 10 to August
14 from 9:00 am to 11:30 pm each day. The Facebook announcement calls
on
readers to "Join us for a week where fasting workers will demand
meetings
with our reluctant MLAs, find strength in our community and spiritual
allies, and seek justice for the workers who've spent their lives
building BC's tourism industry."
The worker wants to meet with members of the
Legislature to demand action to protect their jobs regardless of how
long they will be laid off due to COVID-19. The tourism industry is
asking for a $680 million bailout and the workers insist that any
assistance to
the industry should be contingent on protection of their jobs. Hotel
operators in BC are
also calling for a further extension by the provincial government of
the layoff period, after which employers have to pay severance, beyond
the current end date of August 30, and for the federal government to
extend the Canadian Emergency Response Benefit (CERB).
There are 1,252
hotels and 83,000 hotel rooms in
the province. All were closed at the onset of the pandemic and about
25 per cent remain closed. Those that have reopened are running at
about 30 per cent
capacity. Only a small fraction of the regular workforce has been
recalled, often at reduced hours of work without regular work schedules.
Prior to announcing the week of fasting at the
Legislature, Local 40 organized a series of events to publicize their
situation and demands including pickets, rallies and press conferences
in front of hotels as well as outside Tourism Minister Lisa Beare's
constituency office in Maple Ridge, and at the constituency offices of
other Members of the
Legislature (MLAs). On July 7 about 60 hotel workers and their
supporters rallied outside the Legislature. On July 28 the union
organized a protest outside the Shangri-La Vancouver, a high-end hotel
owned by Westbank and Peterson Investments, two major Vancouver
developers. The protest was against the firing of dozens of workers on
layoff
by the Shangri-La which follow similar actions at the Pan Pacific and
other hotels in the Vancouver area.
The press release issued at the time of the
protest at the Shangri-La contains statements from two of the fired
workers: KM Chan, formerly laid-off server assistant at Shangri-La
Hotel Vancouver said "I don't understand why they had to terminate us.
Why couldn't they just leave us on lay-off so we would have jobs to
return to after the
pandemic? I have co-workers that relied on this job to obtain their
permanent residency and were close to getting their PR status, but with
these unfair terminations they will lose everything they worked so hard
for and could be forced to leave the country." Rajini Fjani, formerly
laid-off room attendant at the Pan Pacific Hotel said "Those of us
who were fired may be replaced by temporary workers earning minimum
wage. My co-workers who remain employed are told they must sign away
their years of service to become casual, on-call workers, and waive
their severance rights. Otherwise, they will be fired. The Province
needs to act now to protect workers and make sure we have jobs
to go back to when business improves."
In an email to Lisa Beare, BC's Minister of
Tourism, Arts and Culture, Michelle Travis, research director for Local
40, explained that at the Pan Pacific hotel management has asked
employees to accept a rollback of their employment rights or risk
losing their jobs. She said "They are being asked to give up their
regular status, their schedule and
seniority to become casual, on-call workers. It also appears they are
being given $250 to sign away any claims on severance."
Travis called on the government to create a
right-of recall for all workers that remains in place until the
pandemic is over, that workers should have a chance to return to their
jobs once the industry recovers. If not, she said, employers will hire
lower paid workers. "That creates a race to the bottom."
Since the onset of the pandemic employers have
sought to use the crisis as pretext for stepping up their attacks on
workers' rights which includes stripping unionized workers of working
conditions and wages they have won over the years and circumventing
minimum standards for non-union workers under Employment Standards.
They want to
replace stable jobs with casual, on call or gig economy-type contracted
jobs where the workers are facing most precarious conditions and are
not covered by the Employment Standards Act. It
must not pass!
BC hospitality workers are waging a courageous
fight for their jobs and for the right of all workers to be treated
with dignity and respect and are calling on everyone to support them.
Besides joining them at the legislature Unite Here local 40 is asking
British Columbians to send a message to their Member of Parliament to
adopt the
"Hospitality Workers' Three Essentials for a Safe Recovery" which are;
protection of workers' jobs, ensuring a safe route back to work, and
providing income support to laid-off workers. The letter can be sent
from the Unite Here Local 40 website at www.uniteherelocal40.org.
Britain
On August 8, workers with Britain's National
Health Service (NHS) held physically-distanced marches to defend their
dignity and to speak out loud and clear that public sector pay
inequality is not acceptable. Their central demand was for a 15 per
cent increase in the level of pay that has been kept suppressed for a
decade. In more than 30
cities, towns and smaller communities in England, Scotland and Wales,
thousands of nurses and other NHS workers took to the streets in
protest against the government's refusal to offer a pay rise despite
their heroism during the coronavirus pandemic. The biggest protest took
place in London and involved a march on Downing Street that ended
with a rally. Workers fell silent for two minutes as a mark of respect
for colleagues who have lost their lives fighting Covid-19. Marchers
were applauded by members of the public as they were heading to Downing
Street and chants of "Boris Johnson hear us shout, pay us properly or
get out" were directed at No 10 which is the official residence
and the office of the British Prime Minister. Among the placards in the
various actions, there were some saying merely "540," the number of NHS
and care workers who have died from coronavirus.. Other placards read
"Covid hero, pay rise zero," "Stop giving nurses the clap," "From hero
to zero," "Nurses are for life, not just for lockdown,"
etc.
Statement of the Save South Tyneside Hospital
Campaign (SSTHC)
on the Occasion of the March
In preparation for the march, the SSTCH issued a
statement entitled " Statement of the Save South Tyneside Hospital
Campaign on the Nurses' Pay Upsurge."
It said:
"On Saturday, August 8, nurses and healthcare
workers, supported by health campaigners and many other supporters,
will hold a physically-distanced march from the Royal Victoria
Infirmary through Newcastle for a rally at the Monument. This is part
of nationwide protests by nurses and healthcare workers throughout the
country in some 30
cities and towns.
"This follows on
from Wednesday, July 29, when
thousands of nurses and other care and health workers marched through
London to Downing Street demanding a wage rise and a stop to the
attacks on the NHS, with the organisers of the demonstration demanding
'No! to public sector inequality and pay justice.'
"Nurses and other health workers are speaking in
their own name and taking up the fight, both to improve their own pay,
and at the same time to take part in the struggle to safeguard the
future of the NHS and care services.
"Since the hypocrisy of Boris Johnson and the
government has been exposed in clapping health and care workers one day
and omitting them from a wage rise the next, nurses have been
expressing their anger on social media and in other forums. Now they
are taking to the streets, supported by doctors and others, in a series
of marches and
demonstrations.
"In our discussions, SSTHC highlighted statements
of very angry nurses that
showed it was not just about the pay but the whole neglect of the
welfare of all health staff. At the same time, they have had to endure
constant attacks on the NHS, increased privatisation, staffing cuts,
the cutting of student nurse bursaries and the promotion of
commercialisation being put above patient care. Also discussed was that
health workers
are struggling from the imposition of austerity, as are so many people,
both working and unemployed. Some health workers are having to use food
banks to eat, and struggling to pay their bills after years of
real-terms pay cuts finished off by a disastrous three-year low pay
deal that again left many more experienced nurses worse off. Nurses
have
lost as much as 20 per cent of their pay in real terms over the last 10
years.
This has driven many to leave, unable to endure the stress of
attempting to deliver patient care to the level they know should be
offered to all as a right.
"Right from the beginning, nurses, care workers
and others in many different groups have made it clear that they
support those in public service receiving a wage increase, and they
also know that many of these services are also being cut to fund
so-called 'wage rises.' They have also expressed opposition
to the Trade Bill and other attacks on
the NHS by the government. This is a government that has used the
COVID-19 crisis to further line the pockets of private health
monopolies and other private companies such as Serco and Deloitte,
whilst continuing with planned closures to hospitals and A&Es
(emergency departments), together with downgrading services throughout
the crisis.
These are services that are vital in delivering healthcare to the
people, the downgrading of which had resulted in many unnecessary
deaths.
"What this new upsurge of nurses and care workers
reflects is that what is being done to undermine their pay and
conditions and the NHS is certainly not in their name. As one
experienced nurse who had worked through the Covid-19 crisis put it in
our SSTHC discussion: 'The nurses and other care workers are now
speaking out in their
name for a new future that upholds and guarantees their well-being as
part of guaranteeing the right of all to healthcare at the highest
standard society can achieve. This is not some future dream. This is
what the authorities should address now, and nurses and healthcare
workers should be empowered to make the decisions in the future for a
new,
human-centred healthcare system for our NHS, our hospitals, our
community and mental health services, and our workplaces.'"
With the day of action, the health care workers
clearly expressed that the whole future direction of the NHS is at
stake, and there must be no return to the so-called "business as usual."
(To access articles
individually click on the black headline.)
PDF
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Website:
www.cpcml.ca
Email: office@cpcml.ca
|