June 13, 2019
BC Forest
Industry
The Need to
Resolve the Crisis in a
Manner that Favours the People
• Clash of
Rights
• Return of the Forestry Sector Downturn
• Organized Forestry Workers Defend Their Rights
Challenging
State-Organized Repression of Workers' Rights
• Government's Use of Heavy-Handed Tactics to
Strip Workers of Their Rights
- Interview, Daniel Légère,
President, New Brunswick Federation of Labour
The Fight in Quebec
for Acceptable Working Conditions in Health Care
• Paramedics Demand Government Respect
Commitments Made During Last Negotiations - Interview, Jean
Gagnon, Representative, Pre-Hospital
Sector of Health and Social Services' Federation
BC Forest Industry
The big companies that dominate most of the BC forest
industry, especially those taking timber from public land, are laying
off workers and even permanently shutting sawmills in both the Interior
and Coastal regions.The social forces in control have refused to deal
with the problems in that sector of the economy in a manner that
favours the people. They show no concern for finding a new direction
for the forest industry that brings stability for working people and
their communities and that humanizes the natural and social environment.
The big forest companies
have long relied on the U.S. market as the main consumer of BC lumber
commodities but that direction has proven to be insecure and crisis
ridden. The aggressive trade agenda of the U.S. imperialists in
collusion with big companies in Canada are using U.S. softwood lumber
tariffs to raise prices and profits in the
U.S. and drive smaller competitors out of business. The situation in
Canada has worsened with the big companies using the social wealth
workers produce to eliminate workers through technological change and
to expand forestry operations in the United States. Interfor, Canfor,
and West Fraser now own more mills in the U.S. than in Canada.
Some point out that the BC government itself has provided these
companies with extra revenue to accomplish that through pay-the-rich
schemes such as incentives to harvest pine beetle damaged timber.
The Globe and Mail writes, "In recent years, the
province [BC] incentivized companies to ramp up production and revamp
mills to clear forest ravaged by the devastating pine beetle
infestation. That work is pretty much done now, with the amount of
timber that companies are allowed to cut annually reduced along with
it. The market
in the United States, meantime, which had helped BC companies reap
record returns last year, has fallen dramatically .... For years now,
forest companies have been shipping two-by-fours out the door and
getting the best price possible for them. That was being done, however,
against the advice of many who saw the writing on the wall and
believed the industry needed to be transitioning from a volume-based
model to one favouring value instead."
The Globe then quotes BC Premier Horgan as
objecting to what the forest companies have been doing: "'Some
companies have taken decisions recently that are going to be
devastating for some communities and we need to be prepared for that.
There is no magic solution to overcut and under supply of fibre. We
need to find ways to
take the fibre we have and do more with it. On the coast, we've been
exporting logs at an unprecedented rate which is insane.' The Premier
said people he talks to in the industry think that strategy is
'criminal.' He added: 'Those logs belong to British Columbia and
they're being sent off as quickly as possible for shareholder profits.'"
Should one not say as well
that the decisions "devastating to some communities" for the benefit of
"shareholder profits" arise from an outdated economic aim bereft of any
social responsibility, and an economic form that no longer conforms to
the modern socialized conditions.
How those "record returns" and "shareholder profits" are
invested is integral to solving problems both in the sector and in the
broad economy, and charting a new economic direction without recurring
crises. For that to happen the working people are striving for economic
and political empowerment in various ways so they can establish control
over their lives and introduce a direction for the economy that favours
them and guarantees their well-being and security. As a first step,
they are laying claim to what belongs to them by right and opposing the
empty rhetoric of those who govern in their name. Only the working
class through its own institutions, its own thinking and organized
efforts can chart and bring about a new direction.
The serious problems and issues facing forestry workers
and their communities represent a clash of rights: the human rights of
the people to control their work, means of production, forests and the
social wealth they produce and its distribution versus the property
rights of the big forestry companies and their oligarchs and political
representatives to defend and expand their private social wealth and
class privilege through the control of the work of the working class,
means of production, forests and the social wealth workers produce and
its distribution.
Wildly fluctuating market
prices and supply and demand seemingly out of control, the recurring
downturns, the aggressive U.S. tariffs that block Canadian softwood
lumber from the U.S. market, automation that only favours the rich
oligarchs and others in control, the removal of the produced social
wealth from the local economy leaving it bereft of strength and any
hope of extended reproduction into other sectors to guarantee the
well-being and security of the people, and the environmental damage
from modern production methods are all problems related to the system
which vests decision-making power in the hands of what is called a
person of state which is controlled by narrow private interests. This
is why the people's striving for empowerment is all about speaking in
their own name, not handing over the right to speak in their name to
others who, in fact, are beholden to that person of state. In the 21st
century, how to provide the problems which plague the economy with
solutions is not rocket science. Solutions exist, but the ruling elite
are just interested in making a killing in any way they can. Their
class privilege and the domination of property right over human rights
must be challenged because they no longer provide society with a
nation-building aim and the productive forces and their communities are
targeted for destruction on a mass scale.
For example, the problems of pollution and climate change do not arise
from any inevitable conflict between the economy and the environment or
something innately wrong with the modern productive forces. These and
other unresolved social and natural problems arise from an absence in
the aim of the economy of social responsibility and active suppression
on the part of the ruling elite of the human factor/social
consciousness and a modern aim for society which guarantees the
well-being and rights of the people and humanizes the social and
natural environment. The lack of politics of social responsibility in
the aim for society and the current suppression of the human
factor/social consciousness that favour only the ruling elite and their
power, class privilege and property right must be challenged in the
court of public opinion.
Political renewal strives to bring the modern socialized conditions of
production in conformity with the rights that people have by virtue of
being human. The working people must discuss these matters without
preconceived notions and lead the way in finding solutions and a way
forward in a new direction. This discussion empowers them by becoming
decision-makers on all issues that affect their individual and
collective lives and the social and natural environment.
The Council of Forest Industries (COFI) representing the
forest oligarchs has publicly stated that between eight and 10 BC mills
could close this summer resulting in hundreds of layoffs and seriously
damaging the economic well-being of many communities across the
province. BMO calculates that the combined reduction of lumber
production to date this year adds up to about 500 million board feet. A
report commissioned by Forest Economic Advisors Canada concurs saying
the province will likely lose 12 mills in the next decade.
These shutdowns are occurring at a time the big
companies are adding two to three new mills every year in the United
States in part because of the aggressive U.S. softwood lumber tariffs
that block Canadian production from entering the U.S. market but also
to take advantage of the terrible exploitation and anti-worker terms of
employment
for workers in the southern United States.
Control of the industry in fewer hands means
decision-making is concentrated in the headquarters of a handful of
oligarchs such as those of the Jim Pattison Group (Canfor) that operate
globally in multiple sectors. Forest workers' unions report that the
big companies are using the recurring crises and unresolved problems to
attack workers and
demand concessions in their terms of employment in BC.
Tolko
Workers at Tolko Mill in Williams Lake stage one-day strike, October
16, 2018.
Tolko reported in mid-May the complete
shutdown of its mill in Quesnel resulting in a loss of 150 jobs. It
also has eliminated a shift at its Kelowna mill for another 90 jobs
gone. More than 150 employees at Tolko's Armstrong sawmill thought they
would be going back to work on June 3 after two weeks laid off.
However, the company informed workers that the sawmill would be taking
another two weeks of downtime.
The Vernon-based company has announced a series of
temporary and permanent cutbacks in BC. Troy Connolly, Tolko's vice
president of solid wood attempted to explain the situation in a media
release: "As the recent rash of curtailments and closure announcements
indicates, current market and cost conditions are making it difficult
to operate
in BC."
Taylor said the price of 2×4 lumber is currently
less than half of what it was a year ago, and below its price of
production. Taylor did not explain why prices could fluctuate so wildly
in such a short period or offer any solution to this dilemma. He gave
the standard answer of a conflict between supply and demand in a market
out of his
company's control or the control of anyone for that matter. Taylor said
supply in the U.S., Chinese and Japanese markets currently outstrips
demand.
At the same time as Tolko announced the extended
downtime at the Armstrong mill, the company also said another two weeks
of downtime would occur at its Soda Creek mill in the Williams Lake
area.
Canfor
Canfor began permanent closure of its sawmill in
Vavenby, BC on June 4, with 172 job layoffs. Vavenby, located 150
kilometres northeast of Kamloops, is a community of just 700 people.
The closure will decimate the entire community. The Canfor press
release said nothing of how the people in the community
will manage without their main source of livelihood. One assumes the
standard imperialist "fend for yourself" is the dictum even when the
socialized economy is not under the control of the working people. The
mill has an annual production capacity of approximately 250 million
board feet. Canfor is looking to sell its forest tenure associated with
the sawmill to Interfor for $60 million. The Jim Pattison Group owns
and controls Canfor.
Regarding the transfer of the forest tenure for $60
million, Interfor argues this deal will be in the public interest as
the supply of wood fibre in the tenure will go to its non-union mill in
Adams Lake.
Canfor surprised many workers on June 11, with the
announcement of a curtailment of production at 12 of its 13 BC
sawmills. The only exception is the WynnWood mill in Wynndel. The
majority of mills will be down for two weeks with extended curtailments
of four weeks at Houston and Plateau, and six weeks at Mackenzie.
Teal Jones
BIV.com reports, "Teal Jones is shutting down second
growth logging operations in its Honeymoon Bay operations on Vancouver
Island, citing high stumpage prices. And that will inevitably translate
into more curtailments at the company's sawmills, said Teal Jones CFO
Haniff Karmally. 'It's very significant for the mills,' Karmally
said.
"Like most other forestry companies in BC, Teal Jones
has already taken several curtailments at its lumber mills in recent
months, due to both falling lumber prices in the U.S. and rising
stumpage costs, resulting in temporary layoffs.
"'We have taken more curtailment this year and over the
last 12 months than we can recall ever taking,' Karmally said. 'Our
mills have been down for one month to the end of April already. So
we've taken 25 per cent curtailment this year in the mills.'
"About half of Teal Jones' tree farm licence on
Vancouver Island (TFL46) is old growth. Logging will continue on the
old growth, Karmally said, which accounts for about half of the
company's annual allowable cut of 368,000 cubic metres per year. But it
will cease all logging on its second growth. The immediate impact will
be on logging
contractors. 'They will have to create some layoffs,' Karmally said.
'They have no choice. This is impacting about half the operation. The
old growth is profitable, just because of its value,' Karmally said.
'Second growth, by its very nature is of much less value.'
"Stumpage is what the provincial government charges
companies to harvest timber on Crown land. The market value of logs
affects stumpage prices. Karmally said the higher premiums from log
exports (especially last year) have boosted stumpage costs. He added
the company believes there has also been speculative bidding on BC
Timber
Sales, which could also be driving stumpage rates up."
Western Forest Products
Western Forest Products plans to cut shifts at three
Vancouver Island sawmills, where organized workers in USW Local 1-1937
are in the midst of bargaining for a new collective agreement and
strike votes at all units are underway. Western Forest Products will
curtail its Duke Point sawmill for two weeks and its Saltair sawmill
for one week
in June. The company will also reduce operating levels from 120 hours
per week to 80 hours per week at its Chemainus sawmill.
Norbord Inc.
Norbord Inc. announced on June 11 the indefinite
cessation of production at its mill in 100 Mile House, BC beginning
this August. One hundred and sixty workers are affected by the
shutdown.
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
West Fraser says all mill activities will be curtailed
temporarily for a week in June at five BC sawmills. West Fraser says
cutbacks and layoffs will take place at sawmills in Chetwynd, Quesnel,
Williams Lake, Smithers and Fraser Lake.
Interfor
Interfor recently announced it would also cut back on
operations this June.
One-day strike at the Canfor Mill in Prince George, October 25, 2018 to
back contract demands
of mill workers. (T. Tate)
The USW forestry unions in BC accuse the big forest
companies of using the downturn in the sector to intimidate their
members. Many are in negotiations for new contracts, as most expire
this year with only a few resolved.
USW Local 1-1937 (coast forest industry) has meetings
and strike votes scheduled throughout June and into July for its locals
of Western Forest Products. The bargaining committee is asking members
for a strong strike mandate to be used if necessary. (For strike vote
meetings, click
here.)
The Local's Update #5 reads, "Since our last update
Western Forest Products has dug in and maintained all of its massive
concessions from workers while at the same time not agreeing to any of
the Unions proposals."
Brian Butler, President of USW Local 1-1937 writes in
the update, "The company is betting the farm that workers will accept
massive concessions including the elimination of their pension plan,
erosion of seniority rights, reducing rights in contracting out
language, cutting benefits, reducing vacation entitlement and many more
.... All the
while outright rejecting any of the Unions proposals, including
appropriate wage and benefit improvements and addressing onerous
alternate shifts which members have overwhelmingly labeled as unsafe
and negatively impacting their health and family life as well as their
ill-conceived and ill-managed drug & alcohol policy that drives
safety
underground and targets and demeans workers." (See Update
5 and Update
6.)
USW Locals 1-405, 1-417 and 1-423 representing forest
workers in the BC southern interior are in negotiations with the
Interior Forest Labour Relations Association (IFLRA). The USW
Bargaining Update #31 writes:
"IFLRA Chooses to Final Offer USW Committee Instead
of Negotiate
"USW Locals 1-417, 1-423 and 1-405 spent May 15th and
May 16th at the bargaining table attempting to negotiate in good faith
with the IFLRA to conclude a collective agreement for the Southern
Interior forest industry. Regrettably the IFLRA refused to negotiate,
choosing instead to table a 'Final Offer' that the USW Negotiating
Committee
cannot support. The IFLRA's final offer is similar to the deal that was
agreed to in the North, however, contains language not in the North
agreement. Due to the IFLRA's refusal to compromise or move on those
differences, the USW Southern Interior Locals will be giving the
affected members an opportunity to vote on the final offer. Your
USW bargaining committee consisting of the presidents of Locals 1-417,
1-423 and 1-405 will be taking the IFLRA final offer to the membership
for a vote of the affected operations."
Challenging State-Organized Repression of
Workers' Rights
- Interview, Daniel Légère,
President, New Brunswick Federation of Labour -
Demonstration by nursing home workers, organized in
CUPE, in Fredericton April 12, 2019, as part of their fight against the
violation of their right to strike.
Workers'Forum recently talked with Daniel
Légère, newly
elected President of the New Brunswick Federation of Labour. Daniel was
President of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) New
Brunswick for the past 14 years. On behalf of CUPE New Brunswick, he
spearheaded, among other things, the "Breaking the Mandate"
campaign to fight for public sector wage increases. Successive
provincial governments, Progressive Conservative and Liberals, have
imposed a mandate to suppress wage increases. The attacks against wages
and living and working conditions come with state-organized repression
against the workers' struggles that is seen both in the private and the
public sector. Légère shares his views about this problem.
Workers' Forum: You were elected
President of the New
Brunswick Federation of Labour at the end of May. Congratulations! Best
wishes for success in your important work.
In the press release of the Federation following the
Convention, you
write that the labour movement is facing challenging times, both in the
public and the private sector. Can you tell us more about this?
Daniel Légère: What we are
seeing is action by
governments, employers, the courts, and legislation stripping the right
of free collective bargaining away from workers. We have the bitter
example of what happened with Canada Post. CUPW members were on a legal
strike and the federal government legislated them back to
work. Make no mistake about it, this came from the Trudeau government
as Canada Post only has one shareholder, the federal government of
Canada. It is the federal government that legislated them back and
stripped the right to strike away from those workers.
Provincially here in New Brunswick, we are seeing this
as well.
Nursing home workers are facing legislation taking away their right to
strike. The Labour Board declared at some point that it was
unconstitutional to deprive these workers of their right to strike, and
then the provincial government took it to the courts. The most blatant
and the
most upsetting example was that the workers had a victory at the Court
of Queen's Bench when Justice Garnett ruled that to deny the nursing
home workers their right to strike was causing irreparable harm to
them. But
within two hours of that decision, the provincial government had a
hearing by the Court of Appeal. Now who can get in front of the
Court of Appeal within two hours of a verdict being rendered by the
Court of Queen's Bench? The judges of the Court of Appeal reserved
their decision for a later date and meanwhile the nursing home workers
cannot go on strike. This is a government using heavy-handed tactics,
using legislation and the courts to strip the workers of their right to
strike.
At the moment in New Brunswick we have a minority
Conservative
government. The Liberals brought forward a motion that government
should go to unfettered binding arbitration to settle this. In our
nursing homes there is a real crisis as there is across the country in
the long-term care sector. The motion passed with all the opposition
parties
supporting it and still the government refuses to go to unfettered
binding arbitration. They said they agree to binding arbitration but
the arbitrator's hands will be tied and restricted so much that the
outcome will have to be what the government wants. This is a sad day
for democracy when the majority of the Legislative Assembly wants the
government to fix this and says how to fix it and the government still
refuses. I think that the Higgs government does not have the confidence
of the Legislative Assembly.
If you look at what is
happening in the private sector, in
Belledune, Steelworkers took a strike vote and gave strike notice, but
the employer locked them out instead, ran to the courts and had an
order allowing only six picketers per picket line, and that is in
totality. I have gone up a few times, and when I am on the line with
the strikers, one
member has to drop off. There is all kinds of other stuff. They are
busing scabs in but the court ruled that Steelworkers are not allowed
to demonstrate at the pickup spots for the scabs and are not allowed to
take any photographs except for evidence purposes. Employers are using
the courts to strip free collective bargaining rights away from
workers, both in the private and the public sector.
WF: How do you see the development of this
challenge to workers' rights being stripped away?
DL: The labour movement is at a
crossroads. We have to
challenge all these sorts of things, and at some point we have to be a
little bit more militant I think. It is a level of militancy that seems
to have gone away for the last decade or two.
We have to challenge this at every opportunity. We have
to appeal
these bad decisions. We have got to use every avenue at our disposal to
take this on. It is time for the labour movement to start being a
little more proactive.
They want to reduce the process to collective begging,
not
collective bargaining. Labour has to come together. One union cannot do
it alone. We need the entire labour movement to come together and we
need civil society to come together as well. We have to work beyond the
union movement.
The Fight
in Quebec for Acceptable Working Conditions in Health Care
- Interview, Jean Gagnon, Representative,
Pre-Hospital Sector of Health and
Social Services' Federation -
Workers' Forum is
posting below an interview with Jean Gagnon, who is the Representative
of the Pre-Hospital Sector of the Health and Social Services'
Federation (FSSS-CSN). The federation represents approximately 3,500 of
the 5,000 paramedics across Quebec. After a protracted strike, these
paramedics signed a collective agreement in 2017 in which the
government of the day made specific binding commitments.
Workers' Forum: The FSSS-CSN recently
published the
communiqué "Pre-hospital emergency services: the government must
respect its commitments." What is the non-respect of the Quebec
government's commitments to paramedics and the public?
Jean Gagnon: When we renewed our
collective
agreements in 2017, we had demands regarding the workload of the
paramedics that work on hourly schedules and the transformation of
around-the-clock on-call schedules into hourly schedules. These on-call
schedules force paramedics to be available 24 hours a day for seven
days. The government sent us a letter announcing these measures and the
criteria with which it was monitoring the workforce year after year.
When thresholds were reached, the government was to convert the on-call
schedules into hourly schedules and to add more workers in the case of
the hourly schedules. These thresholds are based on
measuring the time spent answering calls for ambulances, and beyond a
certain threshold, the on-call schedule becomes untenable. It becomes
untenable because the paramedics stay at work far too long. We are
forced to remove them from the road and replace them with another team.
But if they were on 12-hour schedules, they would finish their
shift, perhaps a little late sometimes, but another team would take
over. In other places, we are not able to answer the calls in the time
that is required so vehicles must be added.
Sign during the paramedics' 2017 strike states
that their schedules are inadequate to provide timely medical
intervention.
|
The
fact
is
that
since
2017,
they
have
not
provided
us with any data other
than what we used last time we were in negotiations. So the data we
have are from 2015-16. We do not have data for 2016-17 and 2017-18. Yet
we know that in many places we meet the criteria for adding vehicles
and changing these around-the-clock on-call schedules. At the moment,
the areas for which we want official data, the areas for which we know
that the thresholds have been reached with respect to the on-call
schedules, are Farnham, Cabano, Baie-Saint-Paul, La Malbaie, Amos,
Malartic, Ville-Marie, La Tuque, Coaticook and Weedon. In regards to
workloads for those working on hourly schedules, we have Quebec City,
the Laurentides-Lanaudière region, Montérégie and
Sherbrooke. In addition, with respect to Urgences-santé [the
public emergency medical service for Montreal and Laval -- WF Ed. Note],
there
were
77,000
hours
of
service
time
put
in,
the equivalent of 70
full-time positions, and at the moment there are about 15 positions
that have been created, with people put on the road. We know that when
the workload is too high, paramedics face post-traumatic stress,
burnout, problems retaining workers in the profession and all the
problems that result from this.
For the cities I just named, we do have our people
collecting
data, we can get data from the employer, we can see the hours our teams
do, and we know the places where, in our opinion, the thresholds have
been reached. It is up to the government to provide us with the
official data.
WF: What work are paramedics and the
union doing to force the government to honour its commitments?
JG: Right now, we are in the process of
denouncing
the situation and of course we are giving the government the
opportunity to hear us and respect its commitments, otherwise other
things will be organized. We do not see how we can start new
negotiations if the government does not respect its commitments from
the last
round. You will hear from us again in the coming months, for sure,
until the government respects its commitments.
We signed these collective agreements with employers,
under the
auspices of the Liberal government of the day, and the Ministry of
Health committed to providing us with the data for each year and to
implement the criteria.
Today we are addressing ourselves to the Coalition
Avenir Québec
government and we are asking how we are going to be able to operate if,
when there is a change of party in power, it does not respect the
agreements that were reached in good faith. We must not forget that if
we did not have these commitments in writing, there would not
have been a collective agreement, we would still be in a dispute and on
strike. That is what settled the dispute and the strike. Although this
commitment is not part of the labour contract per se, it is
still a written commitment from the Ministry that we have in our hands.
We are asking people to support us, to call the
Ministry if they
can to denounce the situation. Most importantly, if they face undue
wait-times, we are asking them to file a complaint.
To contact the Quebec
Ministry of Health and Social Services regarding the unacceptable
situation facing the paramedics and the people who require their
services, call: 1-877-644-4545 (toll free line).
FOR COVERAGE ON
· Aggressive Trade Agenda
of the U.S.
· One Year of Resistance to
the Anti-Social Offensive
of the Ford Government
· Struggle
of the Alberta Nurses Against Bill 9's Attack
on Wage Arbitration
· Centenary of the
Winnipeg General Strike
in TML Weekly, June 15, 2019
|
|
(To access articles individually
click on the black headline.)
PDF
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: office@cpcml.ca
|