June 13, 2020 - No. 21
Matters of Concern to the Polity
Government Hands Over Key Advisory
and Decision-Making Power
to Super Cartel
• BlackRock
-- The Super Cartel
- Peter Ewart -
• The
Canadian Connection to BlackRock
• U.S.
Report on Asset Management and Financial
Stability
Beaver Lake Cree Nation
Constitutional Challenge
• Trudeau
Government's
Definition of Reconciliation
- Peggy Morton -
• Beaver
Lake Cree Nation Stands Firm in Defence of
Inherent and Treaty Rights
• Alberta
and Canada Deny Cree Nation's Financial Poverty
in Most Recent Appeal of Court's Advance Costs
Award
- Crystal Lameman -
Canadian Government's
Appeasement of U.S. Imperialism
• Canada's
End Run for Seat on UN Security Council
- Tony Seed -
Organized Resistance Takes
Its Place in the United States
• Fight
for Justice and to End State-Organized Racist
Attacks
and Use of Military Against the People
Dangerous Developments on
the Korean Peninsula
• DPRK
Draws Conclusions on Continued U.S. Warmongering
• Inter-Korean
Relations
Deteriorate
• Virtual
Meeting
on Current Developments
on the Korean Peninsula
COVID-19 Update
• Joint
Call by UN Agencies to End Stigma and
Discrimination
Against Migrant Workers and Their Children
During Pandemic
• U.S.
Inhuman
Treatment of Migrants Endangers
Peoples of the Americas
• On
the Global Pandemic for Week Ending June 13
Supplement
Organized
Resistance Takes Its Place in the United States
• Statements
of U.S. Organizations and Photo Review
Government Hands Over Key Advisory
and
Decision-Making Power to Super Cartel
- Peter Ewart -
The unfolding worldwide pandemic is bringing with
it a profound financial crisis. How the crisis
will be dealt with is a question on the minds of
working people around the world. In Canada,
working people face the additional complication
that as yet, they do not set the direction of the
economy, which is controlled by a financial
oligarchy and governments in their service.
A financial crisis is itself nothing new; crises
are inherent to the capitalist system espoused by
the financial oligarchy. To prop itself up, as the
financial oligarchy lurches from crisis to crisis,
its instruments and forms of organization mutate
and change, like creatures from the Black Lagoon.[1] For example,
out of the crises and corruption of the late 19th
century came the merging of banking and industrial
capital and the giant trusts and monopolies of the
Robber Barons. And out of a cabal of leading U.S
bankers on Jekyll Island in 1910 rose the Federal
Reserve. In the 1990s, came the financial
de-regulation of the banking sector and the
welding back together, Frankenstein-style, of
investment and commercial banking which
contributed in a negative way to the sub-prime
mortgage crisis and the Great Recession of 2008.
And most recently, there is the "warm and fuzzy"
statement from the U.S. Business Roundtable that
the big corporations are responsible to all
stakeholders, rather than the previous Milton
Friedman configuration of only being accountable
to shareholders.
In the midst of these crises and mutations, often
one particular financial institution ends up at
the top of the heap. At the beginning of the 20th
century, it was the mammoth J.P. Morgan bank.[2] In 2008, it was
Goldman Sachs, notorious for shorting its own
customers. In 2020, it is BlackRock, the asset
manager, shadow bank and super-cartel, which has
obtained unprecedented power and authority over
handing out trillions of public dollars in bailout
funds from the U.S. Treasury, as well as being
appointed key advisor to the Bank of Canada in its
bailout program.
Founded in 1988 by financier Larry Fink and
others, BlackRock has grown in leaps and bounds
since then, its assets under management now
amounting to $7.4 trillion, as well as another $20
trillion through Aladdin, its financial risk
software platform. It has offices in 30 countries,
clients in another 200, and is by far the largest
asset manager and shadow bank in the world, with
assets under management greater than the GDP of
any country. BlackRock is the largest private
investor in weapons manufacturing in the world,
owns more oil, gas and thermal coal reserves than
anyone else, and is the largest exchange traded
fund (ETF) provider. As of 2017, the firm was a
major shareholder in most of the top 300
corporations in North America and Europe and a
co-owner in 17,309 companies and banks worldwide.[3]
The financial crisis of 2008 proved to be a huge
windfall for the company when the U.S. government
contracted with BlackRock to oversee the massive
bailout of failing banks and other financial
institutions which had been peddling toxic
securities. There was some irony in this in that
BlackRock itself had played an important role in
paving the way for this very same crisis by
pushing for de-regulation of the banking sector in
the 1990s, as well as promoting the toxic
securities market. Indeed, an inverse relationship
appears to be at work. As BlackRock has swollen in
size like a modern-day version of the Hindenburg
blimp, the incomes of workers, small businesses,
and other sections of people in the U.S. and
Canada have stagnated or shrunk.
It is a sign of the times that most big banks and
financial institutions in the U.S. and elsewhere
are clamouring to be designated as "systemically
important financial institutions" (SIFI) in order
to be eligible for bailouts of public dollars from
the U.S. Treasury and other Central Banks.
However, BlackRock is an exception. Instead, it
has strongly resisted being designated a SIFI. And
there is a telling reason for that. To become a
SIFI means that BlackRock would have to come under
some government regulatory authority such as the Dodd-Frank Banking
Act of 2010 which was brought in to
provide a minimum of regulation over the
out-of-control financial institutions that
precipitated the 2008 crisis. For BlackRock, the
largest shadow bank in the world, even a small bit
of regulation over its activities is too much.
Thus, while many financial institutions are
limited to some extent by government regulation,
BlackRock and other pirate "asset managers," sail
the murky waters of an unregulated financial
world. There is an even more inherent instability
in the shadow banking sector than in that of
traditional banking. Unfettered by regulations,
shadow banks often engage in risky behaviour that
is not backed up by reserves, resulting in
dangerous levels of financial leverage,
overstretch and debt.[4]
Like bombs, these shadow entities lie deep within
the financial system waiting to explode, enriching
financiers but destabilizing entire economies and
wreaking havoc in the lives of millions, as
happened in the 2008 Great Recession and other
crises.
When such crises
emerge, BlackRock and the financial oligarchy as a
whole, advocate fire hosing trillions of dollars
of public money into the hands of the big banks
and corporations, either directly or indirectly,
thus diverting funds away from health care,
education, social services, and other areas of
physical and social infrastructure. In charge of
this "fire hosing," of course, are the private
financial institutions, and at the head these days
is BlackRock.
BlackRock's power and authority come not just
from its sheer size, but from the fact that it
constitutes, as one analyst puts it, a virtual
"fourth branch of government,"[5] or, as some
might say, the "first branch." From the beginning,
a key part of BlackRock's strategy has been to
recruit top state officials from around the world
on an "in and out" basis. One year they might be
working for government, the next year for
BlackRock. And vice-versa. For instance, Jean
Boivin is currently the head of BlackRock's
Investment Institute, but formerly served as
Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada and
Associate Deputy Finance Minister. In addition,
BlackRock has on its staff many former White House
officials and routinely advises top government and
central bank officials in North America and
Europe. In this and myriad other ways, the lines
are obliterated between state and private
corporation, with the state being reduced to an
ancillary or adjunct role.
Another important source of BlackRock's power is
that it constitutes a de facto "super-cartel," even
though regulatory officials have not dared so far
to designate it as such.[6]
In recent years, asset managers and shadow banks
like BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street have
become the first tier organizations of the
financial oligarchy, displacing even the huge
investment banks like Goldman Sachs. Together, the
"Big Three" of BlackRock, Vanguard and State
Street dominate three-quarters of the
multi-trillion world market of index funds. Their
assets under management amount to more than all
the sovereign wealth funds on earth and over three
times the global hedge fund industry.
In cartel-like fashion, the Big Three have
interconnected ownership. For example, Vanguard
and State Street own substantial shares in
BlackRock, and together the Big Three are "the
largest single shareholder in almost 90 per cent
of S&P firms, including Apple, Microsoft,
ExxonMobil, General Electric and Coca-Cola."
According to various analysts, the Big Three
coordinate their votes at shareholder meetings
through centralized corporate governance
departments.[7]
In corporate mergers, the Big Three are often on
both sides of a deal, i.e. they are invested in
both the buyer and the seller, which gives them
"superior two-sided information compared with
those who operate only on one side of the deal."[8] On the banking
side, the Big Three are also co-owners of many of
the same big banks and thus constitute other loops
of huge financial cartels. As major joint
shareholders, they even dominate financial rating
agencies, such as S&P and Moody's, which
determine credit ratings and can have a huge
impact on the viability of corporations and
governments.[9]
Cartels like the Big Three constitute an alliance
of rival oligarchs that work together against
competitors and other sectors of business and
industry, and present a common front against their
own workers and employees, and the population at
large. Their aim is to obtain maximum profits and
dominate the market and, to do so, they engage in
anti-competitive, monopolistic behaviour,
including price fixing, bid rigging, reductions in
output, and suppression of wages. In so doing,
they have run roughshod over numerous conflict of
interest and regulatory norms to the point that
such norms no longer exist in the financial world
and a naked law of the jungle prevails.
In its most recent
activity, BlackRock has formed cartel-like
relations with the U.S. government and the Federal
Reserve, creating what looks to be a giant
public-private partnership cartel that hands out
public funds to chosen financial institutions and
corporations in the largest transfer of wealth in
history. Early returns show that BlackRock is
dishing out the largest amount of money (48 per
cent) to the very same ETF funds it runs.[10]
Nonetheless, the largest financial organization
and the largest central bank in the world cannot
overcome the black hole of contradictions and
crises at the heart of the financial system. They
only serve to sharpen these.
Despite its blimp-like size, an asset manager
like BlackRock does not create new value in any
way but rather represents yet another layer of the
oligarchic skimming off of the new value already
created by the workers and productive forces in
society. Thus it has a parasitic relationship to
these forces.
However, in their sheer size, BlackRock and the
Big Three are capable of destabilizing the entire
economy of countries through "herding behavior"
and other cartel-type activities such as happened
with the frenzied peddling of toxic securities in
the U.S. by the financial oligarchs back in 2008.
As such, they represent alien, unaccountable
bodies which pose a threat and ongoing danger to
society. A fundamental task for the working people
in the coming years will be to step up the fight
to change the aim and direction of the economy so
it is removed from the clutches of the financial
oligarchy and its institutions and brought under
the control of a public authority accountable to
the people. Such an economy will have no place for
parasitic cartels like the Blackrock looting
machine to exist.
Notes
1. Creature from the
Black Lagoon, 1954 U.S. movie.
2. "The dawn of the
BlackRock era," by Alexander Sammon, The
American Prospect, May 15, 2020.
3. The Capitalists of
the 21st Century, by Werner Rugemer
(Tredition, 2019).
4. "Shadow Banking," Wikipedia,
June 2, 2020.
5. "In Fink we trust:
BlackRock is now 'fourth branch of government,'"
by Annie Massa and Caleb Melby, Bloomberg, May 21,
2020.
6. The Capitalists of
the 21st Century, by Werner Rugemer.
7. "BlackRock, Vanguard and
State Street own corporate America," by Jan
Fichtner, Eelke Heemskerk and Javier
Garcia-Bernardo, Ponderwall, September 29,
2019.
8. "Biggest deals of 2019
had BlackRock, Vanguard on both sides," by Annie
Massa and David McLaughlin, Bloomberg, January 24,
2020.
9. The Capitalists of
the 21st Century, by Werner Rugemer.
10. "BlackRock rakes in
big portion of Fed's ETF investments," by
Christine Idzelis, Bloomberg, June 1, 2020.
In March 2020, the Bank of Canada announced that
BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, is
to be a key advisor and consultant regarding
the federal Liberal government's COVID-19
corporate bailout program. This is just the latest
development in the growing influence and deep
entanglement of the U.S.-based super-cartel in the
economy and politics of Canada, which goes back a
number of years.
For example, there is BlackRock's involvement in
the federal government's Infrastructure Bank. In
the 2015 election, Trudeau proposed the formation
of a federal infrastructure bank "to provide
low-cost financing for new infrastructure
projects" that would "use its strong credit rating
and lending authority to help municipalities
reduce their cost of borrowing."[1] But in January
2016, Prime Minister Trudeau met with BlackRock
CEO Larry Fink at the World Economic Forum in
Davos at a time when Fink was also calling for
increased infrastructure investments by
governments and private interests. Trudeau met
with Fink again in March 2016 in New York. Later
that spring, the Liberal government announced
the formation of an Advisory Council of Economic
Growth which, in the fall of 2016, called for the
creation of a Canadian Infrastructure Development
Bank. By that time, the original concept of the
infrastructure bank -- to provide low-cost
financing for infrastructure projects -- was
replaced with the new aim of allowing the private
sector, including BlackRock and its clients, to
put up much of the financing at a higher cost to
municipalities and other bodies.[2]
Prior to the meeting in fall 2016, Trudeau
government officials worked cheek-to-cheek for
several months with BlackRock executives in
crafting presentations to inform potential
investors about investing in the Infrastructure
Bank. BlackRock personnel organized the investor
meeting for November 14 and, in the course of a
number of bi-weekly sessions leading up to it,
even went so far as to help put together the
PowerPoint presentation that Amarjeet Sohi, the
federal Infrastructure Minister, delivered at the
meeting. Jean Boivin, currently a BlackRock
managing director and previously an Associate
Deputy Minister with the federal government, also
participated in those sessions.
One of the big
attractions of public infrastructure projects for
a private interest like BlackRock is the higher
return on its investments, which can be as much as
seven to nine per cent per year. Of course, that
extra return ends up coming out of the public
purse and, over time, can end up doubling the cost
of projects.[3]
However, a think tank formed by Larry Fink and
other financiers argued that private investment in
public infrastructure represents "a rich
opportunity ... with predictable income streams
and time spans measured in decades."[4]
As the BlackRock Transparency Project and various
news reports have revealed, other government
bodies, such as the Canada Pension Plan Investment
Board (CPPIB), have had their own involvements
with BlackRock.[5]
Mark Wiseman was a CEO of the $278 billion pension
plan board from 2012 to 2016 which manages the CPP
pensions of 20 million Canadians. While at the
helm, Wiseman "significantly outsourced management
of the pension plan's assets to BlackRock,"
including investing in BlackRock's "distressed
mortgage funds" and other global investments. As
CEO of the CPPIB, Wiseman was eventually appointed
to the government's Advisory Council of Economic
Growth. However, just three days after its first
meeting, "Wiseman abruptly announced his intention
to resign from the [Council and the CPPIB] to join
BlackRock as its global head of equities." Despite
this clear conflict of interest, the federal
government allowed Wiseman to remain on the
Council, as well as to stay on as a senior advisor
to the CPPIB. And so it is that the federal
government allows BlackRock officials to be key
advisors while at the same time lobbying for
federal funding.
Besides Wiseman and Jean Boivin, both of whom
jumped to BlackRock from top positions in the
public sector, there are a number of other
examples of the "revolving door" of high level
personnel between BlackRock and the federal
government. For example, in 2018, BlackRock took
on another CPPIB official, Andre Bourbonnais who
had been the CEO of PSP Investments, which is the
$139 billion retirement fund that manages
investments for the Public Service, the Canadian
Armed Forces and the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police. All told, there are more than two-dozen
additional officials "who have worked or interned
at both the CPPIB and BlackRock." According to the
BlackRock Transparency Project, BlackRock has had
"a significant hand not only in the
[infrastructure] bank's creation, but in personnel
decisions as well" including determining who
should fill key positions.[6] Thus the state
and the super-cartel become one.
For his part, Prime Minister Trudeau continued to
meet with BlackRock executives, including
attending a private dinner with BlackRock
executives on March 8, 2017 and a meeting in 2018
in New York with BlackRock investors. Today, with
BlackRock appointed as key advisor in the COVID-19
bailout program, even the Bank of Canada has been
"thrust into BlackRock Inc.'s increasingly crowded
orbit."[7]
One of the oldest economic think tanks in Canada,
the C.D. Howe Institute, has also been brought
under BlackRock's influence. In 2017, the
Institute, which previously had published a study
critical of the idea of an Infrastructure Bank,
received funding from BlackRock and appointed a
top official from the super-cartel to its board of
directors. Since then the Institute has issued
various publications praising the Infrastructure
Bank.
Besides its inroads into the Canadian public
sector, BlackRock has a huge involvement in the
private sector. Although the full extent is not
known, BlackRock either manages or owns assets in
most large North American companies and financial
institutions, including those in Canada. As well,
iShares, its family of exchange traded funds
(ETFs) dominates the $200 billion ETF market in
Canada (as it also does in the huge U.S. market).
In 2019, BlackRock formed a strategic alliance
with RBC Global Asset Management to deliver a new
brand of ETFs named "RBC iShares" worth $60
billion. According to a press release from RBC,
"this transformational alliance brings together
two market leaders: the world's largest ETF
manager and Canada's largest asset manager."[8]
Not a few pundits,
journalists, academics, NGOs and unions have
raised concerns about BlackRock's growing clout
over the Canadian economy as well as its ethical
violations.[9]
Critics have argued that BlackRock's role in the
creation of the Infrastructure Bank "puts the
priorities of wealthy investors and BlackRock
clients ahead of Canadian taxpayers, public
pension investors, and consumers." Others have
pointed out that the cozy relationship between the
company and government "violated federal conflict
of interest rules and gave BlackRock preferential
treatment in the selection and implementation of
projects financed by the new bank." Matthew Dube,
the NDP's parliamentary infrastructure critic,
says that "Canadians will likely have to pay twice
for their infrastructure -- first through the
federal treasury and then through user fees that
will generate corporate profits."[10]
Besides the issue of the Infrastructure Bank,
there is the broader issue of a super-cartel like
BlackRock being in a position to take actions and
make decisions that impact the public interest of
Canadians in fundamental ways. Indeed, the
corporation threatens to enmesh much more of the
Canadian economy in its net, especially now that
it is a key advisor in the government's COVID-19
bailout program, which will provide funding to
chosen corporations and financial institutions. As
one professor has commented, it's likely that
BlackRock now "oversees at least a portion of just
about every Canadian's retirement nest egg."[11]
The super-cartel currently has $27 trillion of
assets under management, while the Canadian
economy has only a GDP of $1.9 trillion. Thus it
has the capa:bility to influence and distort the
entire direction of the economy as well as the
political affairs of the country. But should a
giant entity with such narrow aims have such
influence over everything from public pensions to
the economy as a whole? After all, BlackRock's
aims are all about its own private interest and
that of its clients, not the broader public
interest.
The super-cartel aggressively pursued the
interests of its investors (and its own interests)
when it pushed to de-regulate the financial sector
in the U.S. in the 1990s and promoted the toxic
mortgage-backed securities market, all of which
contributed to the financial crisis of 2008,
resulting in countless bankruptcies, housing
foreclosures and job losses in the U.S., Canada
and elsewhere (while BlackRock benefited hugely
from the very crisis it helped cause). Over the
years, it has pursued cartel-type policies that
put its interests first and which various
observers believe should be prosecuted or made
illegal. In addition, as an example of its lack of
commitment to any sort of public interest, the
super-cartel has been named in various
international tax evasion scandals, including
those revealed in the Paradise Papers and Panama
Papers.[12]
All of this shows that we need a new direction
for the economy in Canada. Decision-making power
must be in the hands of the Canadian people, not
in those of a super-cartel or a financial
oligarchy with a hammerlock on the state.
Notes
1. "Private-sector role in
Canada Infrastructure Bank raises conflict
issues." by Bill Curry, Globe and Mail,
May 5, 2017.
2. "Creating
a
Canadian infrastructure bank in the public
interest." by Toby Sanger, Canadian Centre
for Policy Alternatives, March 20, 2017.
3. Ibid.
4. "New
evidence
shows BlackRock's role in Canada Infrastructure
Bank may have also included advising on key
personnel," by Black Rock Transparency
Project: Campaign for Accountability, August 27,
2018.
5. Ibid.
6. "Why the Bank of Canada
needs BlackRock's help while fighting the
coronavirus downturn," by Kevin Carmichael, Financial
Post, April, 1, 2020.
7. Ibid.
8."RBC Global Asset
Management and BlackRock Canada announce strategic
alliance to transform Canadian ETF market," RBC
Global Asset Management, January 8, 2019.
9. "Democracy
Watch
files complaint with Ethics Commissioner raising
questions about violations of federal ethics law
by BlackRock and the federal cabinet." by
Bradford, Democracy Watch, May 24, 2017.
10. "What
is
BlackRock, and why does it matter now in
Ottawa?" by Andy Blatchford, Maclean's,
May 11, 2017.
11. Ibid.
12. "Canada
Infrastructure
Bank promoter involved in tax havens."
National Union of Public and General Employees,
accessed May 2, 2020.
In 2013, the U.S. Treasury Department's Office
of Financial Research conducted a brief overview
and analysis of the asset management industry with
respect to how giant firms like BlackRock,
Vanguard and others, through their activities,
could introduce "vulnerabilities" that might pose
threats to the financial stability of the economic
system.[1]
The study, titled "Asset management and financial
stability," was done on behalf of the U.S.
Government's Financial Stability Oversight Council
to better inform its analysis as to whether such
firms should be put under "enhanced prudential
standards and supervision" as designated by the
Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
which came into being in the wake of the 2008
financial crisis.
Financial regulations are one of the tools which
the large corporations and banks that dominate the
economy use to sort out contradictions within
their ranks, but they are also used as weapons by
one faction, sector or cartel of business against
others. In that regard, an ongoing controversy in
the U.S. has been that the giant asset management
corporations are not as restricted by regulation
as other sectors of the financial industry, which
gives them a competitive advantage. To remain in
that position, BlackRock, the world's largest
asset management company, has successfully opposed
the imposition of regulation to the point that it
has even refused to be designated a "systemically
important financial institution" and thus be
subject to more regulation, despite its gigantic
size and influence. Indeed, asset management
companies remain largely unregulated despite the
efforts of the Office of Financial Research and
other sections of the financial oligarchy.
Nonetheless, in its report the Office of Financial
Research reveals some of the risks and dangers to
the larger economy posed by the rise of these
asset management companies.
The report points out that in 2013 the U.S. asset
management industry oversaw the allocation of
approximately $53 trillion in financial assets. In
2020, these assets now amount to approximately $90
trillion, matching the GDP of all the
countries of the world combined. The report notes
that the industry is central to the allocation of
financial assets on behalf of investors and is
marked by a high degree of innovation and diverse
financial activity. Asset management firms and the
funds they manage "transact with other financial
institutions to transfer risks, achieve price
discovery, and invest capital globally through a
variety of activities."
However, their activity differs in key ways from
that of banking and insurance companies (although
these latter may also have asset management
divisions within them). For example, "asset
managers act primarily as agents, managing assets
on behalf of clients as opposed to investing on
the managers' behalf. Losses are borne by -- and
gains accrue to -- clients rather than asset
management firms."
In contrast, although some asset management
activities may be similar, "commercial banks and
insurance companies typically act as principals:
accepting deposits with a liability of redemption
at par and on demand, or assuming specified
liabilities with respect to policy holders."
According to the report, asset management firms
could possibly engage in a certain combination of
fund- and firm-level activities within a large,
complex firm, or have a significant number of
asset managers engage in riskier activities, all
of which could end up posing, amplifying or
transmitting a threat to the monopoly capitalist
system.
The report identifies four key factors that make
the asset management industry vulnerable to
threats and shocks:
1. "reaching for yield" -- (i.e. seeking ever
higher returns on investment by purchasing riskier
assets, as well as "herding" behaviours, which
include stampeding in and out of markets and
investments especially at times of market
stress);
2. "redemption risk" -- (i.e. early or heightened
withdrawal of funds from a financial institution
or instrument, etc. in a stressed or illiquid
market causing a cascading crisis and even
insolvencies);
3. "leverage" -- (i.e. the use of borrowed funds
which can amplify asset price movements and
increase the potential for fire sales' of assets,
which can then spread to the larger market);
4. "firms as sources of risk" -- (i.e. given
their size, the failure of one of the big asset
manager corporations could pose a risk to the
financial stability of the entire economy, as
happened with several of the large Wall Street
financial institutions in 2008). In other words,
the bigger they are, the harder they fall. The
problem is that they not only hit the ground hard,
but also pull down the entire economy with them,
plunging millions of workers, small and
medium-sized businesses, pensioners and the
population as a whole into crisis and ruin.
In that regard, the asset management industry is
highly concentrated. Although the report does not
mention the word cartel at all, some of the
activities it describes hint at cartel type
activity. For example, the report states that
"interconnectedness and complexity can transmit or
amplify threats to financial stability" and that
"large financial companies tend to have multiple
business lines that are interconnected in complex
ways." Further, "these threats may be particularly
acute when a small number of firms dominate a
particular activity or fund offering." This, of
course, contradicts the mantra of asset management
firms like BlackRock that "exchange traded funds"
(ETFs) and other financial instruments, that it
dominates in both the U.S. and Canadian markets,
are a safe investment.
What the report exposes is the high degree of
potential instability and chaos that lies at the
heart of the financial system and how much it has
descended into a "law of the jungle" situation
where even minimal regulations are cast off by the
most powerful. The financial oligarchy has created
huge, highly complex, financial institutions and
structures to enrich itself to an unprecedented
degree. At the same time, it is like the
sorcerer's apprentice conjuring up demons it can't
control, even if it wanted to.
Despite this risk, the U.S. and Canadian
governments have allowed asset management
companies to swell and dominate the economy. And,
more than that, have handed over key advisory and
decision-making power to BlackRock in regards to
the COVID-19 bailout. The consequences remain to
be seen.
Note
1. "Asset
management
and financial stability." U.S. Office of
Financial Research, September
Beaver Lake Cree Nation
Constitutional Challenge
- Peggy Morton -
Rally in Edmonton in support of the Beaver Lake
Cree Nation court challenge,
February 19, 2019.
The federal and Alberta governments have left no
stone unturned in their opposition to the
constitutional challenge launched by the Beaver
Lake Cree Nation in 2008 in defence of their
inherent and treaty rights. At issue is the
consideration of the cumulative effects of
industrial development on the Nation's traditional
land and way of life in project approvals.
The latest development is the appeal, heard in
court on June 4, by the Alberta and federal
governments of the September 2019 ruling of the
Court of Queen's Bench that requires that each
government provide $300,000 per year to the Beaver
Lake Cree Nation in order that its constitutional
challenge can proceed.
The Alberta and federal governments both have
tried from the beginning to make sure the case
never comes to trial. In 2008 they tried to have
the case dismissed. The Alberta government
claimed the action is "frivolous, vexatious and an
abuse of process." The federal government said it
should not be named as a defendant, attempting to
wash its hands of its fiduciary obligations to the
Beaver Lake Cree and ignoring the fact that the
Cold Lake Weapons Range is on their territory. The
court ruled in 2013 that the trial could proceed.
While the cartel parties in power have changed in
the intervening seven years, the refusal to
negotiate in good faith and attempts to shut down
the constitutional challenge remains.
What the Trudeau and Kenney governments are
demanding in their appeal of the 2019 ruling on
costs is that Beaver Lake should have to exhaust
all its funds in order to continue to defend its
claim, which the Nation has said it will not and
cannot do. They are demanding that a community
whose only source of clean drinking water is a
water truck must choose between clean water and
continuing its case. This reveals the cynicism of
Trudeau's "I hear you," "no relationship more
important" and promises to do better.
In its 2018 budget,
the Trudeau government stated that, "Indigenous
participation in modern treaty negotiations will
be funded through non-repayable contributions."
But the government continues with the fiction that
the numbered treaties like Treaty Six, to which
Beaver Lake is a signatory, are land cessation
treaties and there is nothing left to negotiate.
Oral history clearly shows this is not the case,
not to mention that the conception of selling land
does not even exist in Indigenous law, tradition
and outlook which Indigenous treaty-makers were
duty-bound to uphold and did uphold. Equally
hypocritical are the Trudeau government's repeated
promises of potable drinking water for all
Indigenous people. This kind of hypocrisy
underscores the necessity to modernize the
Constitution of Canada so that it eliminates the
colonial relationship with the Indigenous peoples
and provides redress for all historical
mistreatment.
The Trudeau government's stand is clear and
unacceptable. Its definition of reconciliation is
that Indigenous peoples must reconcile themselves
to the loss of their way of life, the loss of
their ability to carry out their duties as keepers
of the land, and accept Might Makes Right as the
law of the land. It is not going to happen.
Included in the projects that have been imposed on
the territory is the Cold Lake Weapons Range which
is illegally occupying the Nation's traditional
territories and violates the conception of peace
and friendship and must be shut down.[1]
Canadians have a responsibility to stand with the
Beaver Lake Cree Nation who are defending their
own rights and their responsibilities to Mother
Earth. The sovereign right of the Indigenous
peoples to say yes or no to developments on their
traditional territory must be upheld.
Notes
1. Amongst other things,
the Weapons Range is the site of the annual "Maple
Leaf" flag war exercises which involve NATO
aircraft as well as participation from non-NATO
nations including Israel, Australia, New Zealand,
Sweden, Singapore, Brazil, and Colombia.
The Beaver Lake Cree Nation was in court on June
4 due to an appeal by the federal and Alberta
governments against a 2019 ruling of the Alberta
Court of Queen's Bench that the provincial and
federal governments must pay advance legal costs
to the Nation. This ruling allows the continuation
of the precedent-setting legal action initiated in
2008 by Beaver Lake in defence of their inherent
and treaty rights. The action claims that the
cumulative effects of industrial development on
the Nation's traditional land and way of life must
be considered in project approvals. The case is
precedent-setting because it is the first to
challenge the cumulative economic, environmental,
social, and cultural impacts of industrial
development, not just a single project.[1]
Crystal Lameman, the Beaver Lake Cree's
Government Relations Advisor, explains, "This is
about Beaver Lake having a say in what development
looks like in their territory, and on their lands,
to which neither Alberta nor Canada has a bill of
sale -- not under Treaty-making, and not via any
subsequent unilateral decision-making authority."[2]
The Beaver Lake territory spans 38,972 square
kilometres and is in the heart of the oil sands.
Governments have leased out much of this land to
oil companies without any prior consultation or
approval. In total there are 300 projects with
19,000 individual authorizations, around 35,000
individual oil and natural gas wells, the Canadian
Forces Cold Lake Weapons Range, and thousands of
kilometres of pipelines, access roads and seismic
lines on the territory. Nearly 90 per cent of the
traditional territory is scarred and polluted by
numerous tar sands projects, displacing moose and
elk and driving caribou to the brink of
extinction.
As affirmed in the
Kétuskéno Declaration (2008), the Beaver Lake Cree
agreed through a treaty of peace and friendship to
share the land with those who respect their
obligations as keepers of the land and their
traditional, constitutional and treaty rights. The
declaration affirmed their rights and duties as
keepers of the land, and their right to gain their
livelihood from these lands. In the court action
launched in 2008 they assert that governments must
respect the right of the keepers of the land to
say yes or no to developments on their territory.
In 2018, after years of defending their action in
court against both the federal and Alberta
governments using their own funds as well as
extensive fund-raising, Beaver Lake filed an
interim costs application asking the Court to
order that Canada and Alberta contribute to the
cost of proceeding with the case. Alberta and
Canada argued that the Nation should have to
exhaust all of its assets before being granted
advanced costs. On September 30, 2019, Justice
Beverly Browne ruled that Alberta and Canada must
each contribute $300,000 a year to the Nation's
legal costs, while the Nation would have to
contribute a similar amount. Granting of advanced
legal costs is considered an extraordinary
measure, she acknowledged. "The case before me is
sufficiently extraordinary that I should exercise
my discretion to grant the application. In my
view, it would be manifestly unjust to either
compel Beaver Lake to abandon its claim or to
force it into destitution in order to bring the
claim forward. ... Regardless, I am
unwilling to force Beaver Lake leadership to
choose between pursuing this litigation and
attempting to provide for the basic necessities of
life that most citizens take for granted."
Notes
1. Blueberry River First Nation
in BC is also proceeding with a legal action,
which was filed in 2015. See Defence of Treaty
Rights: Blueberry River First Nations Bring
Historic Cumulative-Impacts Lawsuit Back to BC
Supreme Court, TML Weekly,
June 8, 2019.
2. Beaver Lake Cree stand
strong as Canada and Alberta attempt to derail
tarsands legal challenge, by Maia Wikler and
Crystal Lameman, Briarpatch Magazine, June 5,
2020.
- Crystal Lameman -
Crystal Lameman is Treaty Coordinator for
the Beaver Lake Cree Nation.
My home community, the Beaver Lake Cree Nation,
Treaty No. 6 (Alberta), filed a legal action in
2008 based on the Crown's failure to account for
cumulative impacts of industrial development,
including numerous oilsands projects - one of the
world's largest and most carbon-intensive energy
developments. The first of its kind at the time,
the high-stakes Treaty rights action represents a
precedent to the Canadian court. The Beaver Lake
Cree Treaty case will be the first time the court
is asked to draw the line, and to define when
there is too much industrial development in the
context of Treaty 6.
Treaty implementation requires the Crown to
consider the cumulative effects of industrial
development that are threatening Treaty rights to
a way of life, including the right to hunt, fish,
trap and harvest, and such a duty triggers the
honour of the Crown.
If the Crown destroys the meaningful exercise of
Treaty rights by failing to consider what lands
and resources are necessary to maintain Beaver
Lake's way of life, and whether those thresholds
are being exceeded through multiple land use
authorizations, then our rights have been
infringed.
The Crown has
consistently denied that the Treaty promises my
community the continuance of its way of life, and
it denies that under the Treaty it must consider
the combined effects of multiple industrial
activities on the way of life of the Beaver Lake
Cree over time.
Instead the Crown takes the position that it can
authorize the taking up of land -- to which it has
no bill of sale -- subject only to the duty to
consult, which it disputes requires consideration
of the cumulative effects on Beaver Lake's Treaty
rights, and in place of combined considerations,
they consult on a project-by-project basis.
Recently, the Alberta Court of Appeal in Fort McKay First
Nation v Prosper Petroleum Ltd. confirmed
such a duty exists, contrary to the position of
the Crown. However, the Courts have yet to weigh
in specifically on the extent of the Crown's
obligations to consider the cumulative effects of
industrial development on Treaty rights.
Beaver Lake's case will advance the law in this
regard, including with respect to: whether Treaty
6 protects a way of life; what is required of the
Crown to ensure protection; and when the taking up
of land reaches the threshold of infringement and;
the appropriate remedy for that infringement.
Beaver Lake would prefer to negotiate these
issues. As stated by Beaver Lake Cree Nation Chief
Germaine Anderson, "The Nation has never been
opposed to negotiations, we have made that clear,
and still we have not been invited to and met at
the negotiation table."
However, the Crown has, to date, refused to
consider an agenda that would allow for the
meaningful negotiation of these complex issues,
with appropriate funding that would ensure Beaver
Lake's meaningful participation. Canada also
claims negotiations can occur within a special
claims process, which is also acknowledging it
would only address infringement from the creation
of a bombing range in the middle of our territory.
Yet, even in that process we have made multiple
attempts to advance to the first step only to be
rejected on the basis we were out of time for this
fiscal year. We have yet to receive information
about whether or when our claim will be accepted.
As a result, judicial determination, coupled with
the continuance of our land-based practices, is
needed as the Crown disputes it has the claimed
Treaty obligations, and continues to authorize
land use without regard to the cumulative impact
on Treaty rights.
The issues raised in the case are difficult,
complex, broad and have resulted in multiple
pre-trial steps, including multiple motions to
strike the pleadings. For ten years, Beaver Lake
pushed this complex claim ahead to the extent it
could, at a cost of $3 million. Half of the funds
were from generous donors who understood the
importance of these matters being heard by the
courts. Knowing that this case rested on
environmental justice, health and protection, they
supported Beaver Lake's efforts to enforce its
Treaty rights.
But like many Treaty Nations, Beaver Lake is a
financially impoverished community. It has only
recently begun to accumulate some limited
financial reserves, which it desperately needs to
manage and address the deep financial poverty that
has plagued the Nation. However, any financial
reserves are not stable or certain to continue,
and are required for emergencies, like the recent
pandemic and failing infrastructure like the water
treatment plant and natural gas lines, both of
which provide heat and water to our homes, school,
daycare and headstart/playschool.
Therefore in 2018, after 10 years of investing in
the case -- defending pleadings, responding to
particulars, collecting evidence from over 100
members, and retaining multiple experts -- we came
to the agonizing decision that we could no longer
proceed with the litigation as it required at
least $5 million more to get to trial, which the
Nation does not have. We realized it would not be
prudent for the Nation to build half a bridge.
In April 2018, Beaver Lake filed an interim costs
application, which asked the Court to order that
Canada and Alberta pay for the cost of bringing
the rest of the case forward. In doing so it
adhered to the burden of proof and painfully
exposed its financial poverty and community
challenges in a thorough record of over 5,400
pages of financial statements, general ledger
accounts, bank statements, impact benefit
agreements, partnership agreements, trust
documents, Indigenous Services Canada audits and
more. Justice Browne, who had presided over the
case for 7 years, heard the matter for two and a
half days in February 2019, while the Nation's
elders, land-users and leadership looked on, after
fundraising to make the trip outside of the
community to be present during the hearing.
In a decision rendered in September 2019, Justice
Browne found the case had merit, was publicly
important, and in the interests of justice for it
to proceed. She found Beaver Lake was impecunious,
having little or no money, such that "the
litigation would be unable to proceed if the order
were not made." She found that the interests of
justice would be best served through a partial
interim costs order. She ordered that each party
-- Beaver Lake, Canada, and Alberta -- share in
the costs of the litigation and pay $300,000 each
annually until the matter is resolved. In doing
so, she recognized that the twin goals of
reconciliation and access to justice could only be
facilitated through such an order, which would
start to address the gross power imbalance between
the parties.
Now, despite acknowledging the case has merit and
is publicly important, Canada and Alberta have
appealed the costs decision and continue to deny
Beaver Lake's financial poverty. Canada and
Alberta could have chosen to accept Justice
Browne's decision, and moved ahead with having the
matter heard on its merits in June 2024 -- the
date set for the 120-day trial -- but in an effort
to avoid the court setting a precedent on these
important matters it instead chooses to argue
about the extent of Beaver Lake's financial
poverty. The appeal, set for June 4, will
determine whether or not the Nation will continue
on their path to access justice, or whether it
will be denied due to our financial poverty.
Canada and Alberta have attempted through their
development of our lands to deprive my Nation of a
meaningful way of life, a life that is rich and
abundant. Now in this application they say we
should spend every penny we have, regardless of
whether we need that money to provide basic
assistance and/or to meet the very basic needs of
the community.
Our worldview as Indigenous peoples is grounded
in the relationship that we have with the water,
the air that we breathe, to the minerals in the
ground, and all flora and fauna -- walking,
crawling, flying, swimming. It is through the
privilege we have to be in this deep meaningful
relationship that we commit to our collective
efforts and resiliency in enforcing our rights. We
do so, so that we are able to continue with our
rich and abundant life, "as long as the sun
shines, grass grows, and rivers flow."
Canadian Government's Appeasement
of U.S. Imperialism
- Tony Seed -
François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Foreign
Affairs, travelled to New York on June 13 ahead of
the vote on Canada's bid for a seat on the United
Nations Security Council which has roused much
concern and opposition at home. He is being
deployed, according to Global Affairs, for four
days "to engage with various ambassadors and
permanent representatives to promote Canada's
commitment to peace and security, climate change,
gender equality, economic security and
multilateralism." Champagne's schmoozing to get
votes lubricated with "aid" dollars is the end run
for the self-serving, much-hyped bid of the
Trudeau Liberals to restore Canada's tarnished
record on the world stage.
In this way, and with customary arrogance, Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau in his February tour of
Africa to solicit votes for a UN Security Council
seat arrogated to himself the mantle of "white
man's burden." He no doubt shed a crocodile tear
when he visited the infamous House of Slaves in
Senegal on February 12-13 just as he took a knee
in Ottawa during protests of police brutality and
racism in the U.S. Canada sees Senegal, whose vote
it has now apparently secured, as a door opener
for private interests in the African market and
for the industrialized plunder of gold. In
parallel, Foreign Minister Champagne "attended the
issuance of operating licenses for Teranga, a
participant in the Halifax Security Forum, and
Barrick Gold. The Canadian government has
negotiated foreign investment promotion and
protection agreements (FIPAs) with Benin, Burkina
Faso, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Guinea, Mali,
Senegal, Nigeria and Tanzania designed to favour
neo-colonial control of mineral resources. These
are all countries which have been plundered over
and over by colonial powers.
Canada's is a
reputation of appeasement of the U.S. imperialist
economic bloc and war machine all down the line
under the pretext of multilateralism: disregard
for the UN Charter and tenets of international
law; serial violations of human rights such as
those of the Palestinian people as well as asylum
seekers; ongoing intervention in sovereign
countries directly or through coalitions and
sanctions which it cynically refers to as
"restoring democracy;" escalating exports of
lethal arms to conflict zones; the "go-to nation"
of NATO, as it was under the Harper government,
which openly contravenes the UN Charter and
international law; usurpation of military and
police powers during the pandemic; and its abysmal
record of criminal negligence of the conditions of
life of the Indigenous peoples in Canada and
crimes committed against them.
"Its recent dismissal of Wet'suwet'en law,"
writes Pauline Easton, "which it is duty-bound to
respect and uphold, is indicative of its attitude
toward international rule of law as well. In fact,
its bid for a seat on the UN Security Council has
come up against ever stronger headwinds as its
much-repeated claim that Canada is a rule of law
country -- presumably making it well suited for a
seat on the Security Council -- is exposed for all
the world to see."
Canada is vying with Ireland and Norway for the
two seats of Western Europe and other countries
category, of which Canada is considered a part.
Mexico is the only candidate for the one Latin
American and Caribbean seat and Kenya and Djibouti
will contest the seat available for the African
group. India is the only candidate for a
non-permanent seat from the Asia-Pacific category.
Its candidacy was confirmed by the countries which
comprise the Asia-Pacific region, including China
and Pakistan, in June last year.
Elections for five non-permanent members of the
UN Security Council will be held on June 17. Their
term will only start in January 2021.
The UN General Assembly elects each year five
non-permanent members (out of 10 in total) for a
two-year term. The 10 non-permanent seats are
distributed on a regional basis -- five for
African and Asian States; one for the Eastern
European States; two for the Latin American and
Caribbean States; and two for Western European and
other States.
The UN General Assembly adopted a decision to
hold the Security Council elections under new
voting arrangements taking into account
restrictions in place due to the COVID-19
pandemic. Rather than a secret ballot held in the
General Assembly hall, voters are required to
visit a designated venue during a specific time
slot to cast their ballots. Only ballots cast in
the ballot boxes at the designated venue will be
accepted and no ballots will be accepted after the
last time slot has expired.
If the total number of ballot papers cast in all
the ballot boxes do not amount to at least a
majority of the members of the Assembly, the
President will circulate a letter to all Member
States indicating a new date and time for the
elections.
Canada does not deserve a seat on the UN Security
Council which today acts as a block to sorting out
conflicts on a peaceful basis because of the
stranglehold over the Security council by the big
powers, the striving of the U.S. imperialists for
domination and the non-existence of a mechanism to
sort out the contention between the contending
powers. Having five permanent members with veto
power is an arrangement from another age at which
time the UN had 50 members. Today it has 193 and
its decisions should come under the rule of the
majority in the General Assembly.
As for Norway, it too is a founding member of
NATO and toes its positions by acting as a
peace-broker. Regardless of the outcome, the UN
demands modernization and renewal in the spirit of
the times.
Note
1.See also "A Historical
Turning Point Which the Trudeau Government Cannot
Will Away", TML Weekly editorial, and
"Canada's Imperialist Multilateralism," Margaret
Villamizar, TML Weekly,
February 22, 2020.
Organized Resistance Takes Its
Place in the United States
Youth lead Oakland, California demonstration, June
11, 2020, demanding police get out of
their schools.
Across the U.S., actions that started on May 26
to demand justice for the police killing of George
Floyd continue as organized resistance emerges to
take its place. In Minneapolis where Floyd was
killed and across the country, calls for justice
in numerous cases of police brutality and
killings, especially of African Americans, ring
out. Calls also demand profound changes to
policing that will not permit the people to be
victimized by a militarized force that does not
represent their interests. The people continue to
affirm their convictions for new arrangements and
their own empowerment, through protests as well as
other forms.
Since May 26,
protests have taken place in at least 750 cities
in all 50 U.S. states, and internationally in 60
countries on all continents except Antarctica. The
people have not been cowed by the massive
deployments of the National Guard and police
forces against them and widespread acts of police
brutality. Activists have been compiling reports
and footage of such incidents.[1] One such
database as of June 13 has 659 entries. Just one
example is the killing of an unarmed 22-year-old
man in northern California on June 1, while he was
on his knees with his hands raised. Police shot
him from their squad car, claiming to have
mistaken a hammer in his pocket for a gun.
Meanwhile, the website Bellingcat.com has compiled
a list of police violence against journalists that
as of June 2 had 148 entries. It points out that
"To give you perspective on just how enormous this
number really is, the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker
tracked 150 press freedom violations for the whole
of 2019. The incidents in these protests have
almost surpassed the 2019 numbers in a week."[2]
The standout feature of unfolding events is the
organized character of the resistance. People and
their collectives are speaking out in their own
name, basing themselves on their own demands
despite pressure to back factions of the military
and ruling elite that oppose Trump and say they
support the Constitution. The movement has thus
far not been diverted from achieving its aims into
maintaining the status quo that disempowers the
people.
In Minneapolis, with the mass demonstrations
resulting in the firing of and criminal charges
against the four police officers responsible for
killing George Floyd, the people's attention is
focused on making profound changes to the policing
system which criminalizes African Americans and
other disenfranchised minorities as a matter of
course.
Demonstration in Minneapolis, June 7, 2020.
In the face of the people's demands, on June 12,
Minneapolis City Council unanimously passed a
resolution to replace the police department with a
community-led public safety system. "The murder of
George Floyd on May 25, 2020, by Minneapolis
police officers is a tragedy that shows that no
amount of reforms will prevent lethal violence and
abuse by some members of the Police Department
against members of our community, especially Black
people and people of color," wrote five council
members in the resolution. The resolution states
that the council will begin a year-long process of
engaging "with every willing community member in
Minneapolis" in its "Future of Community Safety
Work Group," to develop a "transformative new
model" of public safety in the city. The council
also voted unanimously to end the local emergency
order that had been declared due to the mass
protests that began on May 26 after George Floyd's
death at the hands of the police.
Demands to city council for police accountability
and to disband the Minneapolis police long predate
the killing of George Floyd, local activists point
out, noting that timely action on previous
occasions could have prevented George Floyd's
death. The organization Twin Cities Coalition for
Justice 4 Jamar (TCC4J) -- formed after the 2015
police killing of 24-year-old Jamar Clark -- on
June 11 called for the police officers responsible
for similar killings and other crimes to be held
to account and that justice be brought for all of
the victims and their friends and families.
Activists across the U.S. are making similar calls
to defund police departments and replace them with
bodies over which the people can exercise control,
while increasing social services to provide
working people, not the rich, with security based
on meeting human needs, not the use of state
violence and criminalization of minorities, the
poor and working poor, the marginalized and the
most vulnerable sectors of society.
Minneapolis, June 11, 2020.
The people's resistance is also taking the form
of National Guardsmen refusing orders to be
deployed against protestors, because they see the
justice of those who have taken up the call "Black
Lives Matter" and do not wish to be put in a
position of carrying out brutality against those
exercising their right to protest. As one
member of the California National Air Guard put
it, "What we're told is, 'Discourage people from
criminal activity,' and things like that. But that
doesn't necessarily matter. What's going to be
communicated on the ground when you see people in
uniform with weapons, standing in formation?" He
added that he signed up to do humanitarian work,
"But to actually go out and be this invading
force? Many people are not comfortable with it.
They feel like it's not really what they signed up
for." Veterans' organizations and GI rights groups
report fielding a larger number of calls from
troops asking about their options for refusing
orders. The veterans' peace group About Face says
it knows of some 10 service members who have taken
concrete steps to avoid deployment, while many
others have asked for support in resisting orders
they think are illegal.
Another way this resistance is manifesting is the
tearing down of symbols that glorify slavery or
statues commemorating slave traders. Amidst this
situation, Indigenous peoples living on U.S.
territory are gaining broader support for the
removal of statues of Christopher Columbus as part
of ending the presentation of the genocide and
dispossession of Indigenous peoples as laudatory
historical achievements, rather than crimes
against humanity.
On June 3,
attorneys for the families of George Floyd and
others informed that they are calling on the UN to
open a human rights case against the U.S. and
sanction it for its mistreatment of African
Americans.
As a result of broad and continuing resistance,
former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin,
who held his knee on George Floyd's neck, is
currently being held at the Minnesota Department
of Corrections facility in Oak Park. His bail was
increased to $1 million June 3 when charges were
upgraded to second-degree murder. Former police
officers Thomas Lane and J. Alexander Kueng, who
helped restrain Floyd, and Tou Thao, who stood
near the others, are charged with aiding and
abetting second-degree murder and aiding and
abetting second-degree manslaughter. Bail for them
was set at $1 million without conditions or $750,
000 with conditions. Lane was released June 10 on
a $750,000 bond.
In this TML Weekly Supplement we publish
calls by the organized resistance as well as a
photo review.
Notes
1. To view the spreadsheet,
click
here.
2. "Visualizing
Police
Violence Against Journalists At Protests Across
The U.S.," Charlotte Godart, Bellingcat.com,
June 5, 2020
Supplement
Organized Resistance Takes
Its Place in the United
States
|
|
Dangerous Developments on the
Korean Peninsula
On June 12, the Foreign Minister of the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) Ri
Song Gwon, issued a statement on the second
anniversary of the historic June 12, 2018
DPRK-U.S. Summit that took place in Singapore. The
Summit between Chairman Kim Jong Un, leader of the
DPRK and President Donald Trump of the U.S. was
aimed at establishing a new relationship between
the DPRK and the U.S. that would end hostilities
between the two countries and lead to peace and
the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
"What stands out is
that the hope for improved DPRK-U.S. relations --
which was high under the global spotlight two
years ago, has now been shifted into despair
characterized by spiraling deterioration and that
a slim ray of optimism and peace and prosperity on
the Korean Peninsula has faded away into a dark
nightmare," Foreign Minister Ri said.
He added that the desire of the people of the two
countries to put an end to the "world's most
antagonistic relations between the DPRK and the
U.S. and open a new cooperative era of peace and
prosperity runs as deep as ever. Yet the situation
on the Korean Peninsula is daily taking a turn for
the worse."
The foreign minister pointed out that to foster
positive relations and demonstrate its good faith,
the DPRK shut down its northern nuclear test site
[the Punggye-ri
nuclear testing site -- TML Ed. Note.],
released U.S. citizens accused of committing
crimes against the DPRK, and repatriated scores of
remains of U.S. soldiers killed or missing in
action during the Korean War. He highlighted that
the DPRK took the initiative to suspend nuclear
tests and test launches of Inter-Continental
Ballistic Missiles as confidence-building measures
between the DPRK and the U.S.
In his statement Ri observed that these measures
by the DPRK were simply used by President Trump
for self-serving public relations announcements.
Foreign Minister Ri pointed out that behind the
claims of wanting improved relations with the DPRK
the U.S. has gone in the opposite direction,
turning the Korean Peninsula "into the world's
most dangerous hotspot haunted uninterruptedly by
the ghost of nuclear war" which undermines the
possibility of a durable and lasting peace that
both countries committed to.
"The DPRK is still on the U.S. list of targets
for preemptive nuclear strike and all kinds of
nuclear strike tools held by the U.S. are aimed
directly at the DPRK," Ri noted. As evidence he
pointed to "nuclear strategic bombers, which fly
anytime into south Korean Airspace for nuclear
strike drills and aircraft carrier strike groups
which bustle around the seas surrounding south
Korea."
The Foreign Minister also noted that the U.S.
continues to introduce "a large number of modern,
cutting-edge hardware like stealth fighters and
reconnaissance drones worth tens of billions of
U.S. dollars" to boost the offensive capability of
the south Korean army while burdening the south
Korean authorities with the cost of these weapons.
The DPRK Foreign Minister noted that for the last
two years the DPRK has been subject to "totally
unjust and anachronistic practices" that clearly
show that the U.S. aims to continue a policy of
regime change in the DPRK, carry out threats for a
preemptive nuclear strike and pursue the isolation
and suffocation of the DPRK. He underscored that
unless the "70-plus-year deep-rooted hostile
policy of the U.S. towards the DPRK is
fundamentally terminated, the U.S. will as ever
remain a long-term threat to our state, our system
and our people."
Foreign Minister Ri notes that based on the
evidence, there is no need for the DPRK to hold
out hope for improvement of relations with the
U.S. on the basis of the personal relations
between Chairman Kim Jong Un and President Trump
and that the DPRK will not provide President Trump
with another opportunity to shore up his
self-serving political ends and getting empty
promises in return.
The DPRK Foreign Minister concludes by pointing
out that in the face of this reality, the decision
taken by the DPRK and Chairman Kim Jong Un at the
recent Fourth Enlarged Meeting of the Seventh
Central Military Commission of the Workers' Party
of Korea, was to further boost "the national
nuclear war deterrent to cope with the U.S.'s
unabated threats of nuclear war" and that was the
DPRK's message to the U.S. on the second
anniversary of the DPRK-U.S. Singapore Summit.
On June 9, the Democratic People's Republic of
Korea (DPRK) cut off communications with the
Republic of Korea (ROK). It said it did so in
exasperation because the ROK had not condemned and
ended the distribution of anti-DPRK leaflets
launched by so-called defectors on May 31 from the
border city of Gimpo. Gimpo lies on the south side
of the De-Militarized Zone where the U.S. divided
Korea at the 38th parallel.
Earlier, on June 4, the DPRK sent a message to
the ROK protesting these balloon launches and
calling for action to stop this provocation. It
reminded the ROK of its commitments made in the
Panmunjom Declaration signed on April 27, 2018.
"The south Korean authorities must be aware of
the articles of the Panmunjom Declaration and the
agreement in the military field in which both
sides agreed to ban all hostile acts including
leaflet scattering in the areas along the Military
Demarcation Line."
In the wake of this drastic move by the DPRK,
media report that the ROK government is
contemplating passing a law to make these
provocations illegal and charging those who carry
out such acts.
The Historic Panmunjom Declaration signed between
Chairman Kim Jong Un of the DPRK and President
Moon Jae-in of the ROK paid specific attention to
the need for the DPRK and ROK to work together to
stop military and other provocations against each
other and to build a permanent peace on the Korean
Peninsula. Specifically, the first three
paragraphs of the second point read:
"To defuse military tension and remove war danger
on the peninsula is a very important issue related
to the destiny of the nation and a vital issue for
ensuring a peaceful and stable life of our fellow
countrymen.
"First, the north and the south agreed to
completely discontinue all hostile acts against
each other, which are the source of military
tension and conflict, in all spaces of the ground,
sea and air.
"They agreed to stop loudspeaker broadcasting,
leaflet scattering and all other hostile acts
along the Military Demarcation Line and remove
means of these acts from May 1 for the present and
turn the Demilitarized Zone into a true peace zone
in the future."
Inter-Korean relations have been hampered by the
U.S. ever since it divided Korea in 1945 and its
military and political domination of south Korea
since then. The U.S. maintains that division so as
to use south Korea as a military staging ground to
wage war targeting not just the DPRK but also
China and Russia. Even though today the U.S.
institutions are in a profound crisis, U.S.
foreign policy like its domestic policy is based
on destruction, aggression and war. To keep the
Korean people divided the U.S imperialists
continue to target the DPRK as an aggressor to
divert attention from its own historic and ongoing
crimes against the people of Korea.
The Trump administration has not kept any of its
commitments to the DPRK agreed to at the Historic
DPRK-U.S. Summit in Singapore on June 12,
2018. The second of four points reads:
"The United States and the DPRK will join their
efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime
on the Korean Peninsula."
The slew of U.S. sanctions engineered both
through the UN Security Council and its own
administration, to which Canada adheres, are acts
of war. The U.S. dictate in the ROK, which it
calls a "strategic partner," makes the ROK the
fourth largest importer of U.S. armaments, which
the Korean people have to pay for. That is why,
against the wishes of the people and even
government of the ROK, U.S. interference in
inter-Korean relations continues to cause trouble.
In the face of this reality, it becomes all the
more important for the government of the ROK to
honour its commitments which serve the desire of
the Korean people to attain peace. The future of
Korea will be decided by the Korean people
themselves despite all the difficulties. The
guiding principles of the Korean people's movement
for reunification stipulate that reunification
must be achieved by the Korean people themselves
without outside interference; that it must be
achieved peacefully; and lastly, that it has to be
achieved by the political unity of the Korean
people setting aside their differences.
Held on the Occasion of the
20th Anniversary
of the Historic North-South Joint Declaration
Thursday, June 18 -- 7:00 pm EST
The
meeting
will cover important matters of concern
including:
• Relations
between the Democratic People's Republic of
Korea
and the U.S.
• Inter-Korean Relations, U.S. war
exercises and provocations
• How the DPRK is successfully controlling
the
COVID-19 pandemic despite illegal sanctions
Keynote
Speaker:
Professor Kiyul Chung
Founder and
Editor-in-Chief of The 21st Century
Adjunct
Professor, Korea University, Tokyo, Japan
Visiting
Professor, Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang,
DPRK
Sanctions
on
the DPRK will be discussed by Toronto lawyer Lorne
Gershuny
Organized
by:
Korea Truth Commission (Canadian Chapter),
Korean Federation in Canada
EVERYONE
WELCOME!
To
join meeting and for information click
here.
Meeting ID: 868
1560 7481
Password: 420759
COVID-19 Update
Over 15,000 migrant workers from Myanmar returned
home through this Thai border crossing in a single
day in late March. (IOM)
The following is a joint op-ed by the
International Labour Organization (ILO), the
International Organization for Migration (IOM),
the UN International Children's Emergency Fund
(UNICEF), the UN Office on Drugs and Crime
(UNODC) and UN Women, signed by representatives
for their respective organizations.
COVID-19 has caused mass global disruption and
placed the most vulnerable, including men and
women migrant workers and their children, in great
hardship. Containment measures, notably border
closures and movement restrictions, have had a
significant impact on migrants, exacerbating
existing vulnerabilities and potentially
increasing transmission risks. Loss of income has
led to insecurity, increased risks of violence and
rising debts for this already vulnerable group,
including for families for whom remittances are a
critical income source.
In South-East Asia and the Pacific, 11.6 million
people are migrant workers -- 5.2 million of whom
are women. Many countries in the region rely on
migrant workers for the functioning of their
economies to fill local labour shortages. As of
2019, it is estimated that 2.8 million
international migrant children were living in East
Asia and the Pacific.
Isolation and reduced mobility have increased the
risk of abuse, exploitation and trafficking in
persons, particularly of women migrant workers
(including by employers and partners) and
children. When households are placed under the
increased strains that come from security, health
and financial worries, as well as cramped living
conditions, women and girls are more likely to be
at risk of violence and abuse. COVID-19 response
measures that are not inclusive of migrant workers
in the informal economy further put those workers
and families at risk of exploitation.
School closures have gravely aggravated migrant
children's vulnerabilities, for whom schools
provide not only an education but a haven, a
source of food, an opportunity to identify abuse
and an important platform through which to receive
information. This safety mechanism is now lost,
further compounding the disruption of child
protection services, to which migrant children
already have limited access. They may also face
significant barriers in accessing online learning
opportunities.
Attitudes towards migrant workers were not
generally positive even before the pandemic and
have now only worsened. In ASEAN, there have been
reports of increased verbal abuse against certain
nationalities and migrants presumed to bring the
virus to communities. Such stigmatization and
discrimination are not only unacceptable but
dangerous, and it can put in particular women
migrant workers, their children and families at
risk of both gender-based and xenophobic violence,
harassment and trafficking.
Women migrant workers fill diverse occupations,
including in domestic work, hospitality, seafood
processing, manufacturing, agriculture and
construction. Many are on the front lines of
responding to the pandemic, especially as care
workers. These migrant groups may be at greater
risk of transmission due to their living and
working conditions. Many may not be able to access
essential services, especially when they need it
most, including if exposed to violence and abuse.
Migrants with undocumented or irregular migration
status also live in fear of deportation, making
them less likely to be tested, access health
screening or receive treatment, with negative
consequences for their own health and that of
others. In addition to the fear of losing their
livelihoods if they test positive, migrant workers
are also more likely to be taken advantage of,
with increased wage gaps exacerbating existing
discrimination in some occupations.
We call on States to fulfill their international
commitments under the Convention on the Rights of
the Child, the relevant international labour
standards on promoting decent work, gender
equality and fair labour migration, and the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination against Women.
States should acknowledge that migrants are a
critical part of the response to the pandemic, and
take targeted measures to protect all women, men,
girls and boys, including those in vulnerable
situations. They should develop measures to ensure
access to essential services for all, foster
dialogue between migrants and destination as well
as origin communities to address and prevent
xenophobia, discrimination or stigmatization of
migrants.
Arrests of undocumented migrants should never
form part of containment measures, and in the case
of children contravene the best interests of the
child. Children and young people, including
migrant children, have contributed valuable ideas
and raised awareness on the needs and challenges
of the COVID-19 response.
While the virus does not discriminate, its social
and economic impact is definitely not equal. The
most vulnerable who do not have social protection
coverage, nor ready access to health and essential
services, disproportionately bear more severe
consequences.
Hence the immediate response and long-term
recovery measures must be responsive to the
particular needs and challenges of migrant
workers, especially women and children. This is
the time for solidarity and humanity regardless of
nationality, migration status, gender, sex or age.
Societies, more than ever, have a shared
responsibility to successfully end the pandemic.
No one should be left behind -- no matter who or
where they are, or what legal status they hold.
As highlighted in an appeal made by the United
Nations Secretary-General, let us stand up against
hate, treat each other with dignity and defeat
COVID-19 together.
Jeremy Douglas, UNODC Regional Representative,
Southeast Asia and the Pacific,
Karin Hulshof, Regional Director, UNICEF East
Asia and Pacific,
Nenette Motus, IOM Regional Director, Asia and
the Pacific,
Mohammad Naciri, Regional Director, UN Women
for Asia and the Pacific
Tomoko Nishimoto, ILO Assistant
Director-General and Regional Director, Asia and
the Pacific.
Deported from U.S. during the pandemic, migrants
arrive home in Mexico.
A particular feature of the pandemic in the U.S.
is the government's inhuman treatment of those
without status: immigrants, migrant workers and
asylum seekers. This includes not only lack of
treatment or detention in conditions where
social-distancing cannot be maintained, but also
ongoing deportations of people to Mexico, Central
America and Haiti. All of this is in defiance
of international guidelines and standards for
the treatment of migrants and refugees.
While countries like Cuba and others are
selflessly providing assistance to the peoples of
the world; and while Venezuela, in spite of the
many hardships it must contend with for being an
object of U.S. economic warfare, is welcoming home
and providing free health and social services to
large numbers of returning Venezuelan migrants
(over 58,000 as of June 13, most of them informal
workers) who found themselves stranded and without
any means of support in neighbouring countries
when the pandemic struck, the U.S. imperialists
are showing their callous disregard for human life
by endangering the peoples of Latin America and
the Caribbean at a time when that region is being
hit very hard by the pandemic.
One of the news agencies reported on June 7: "In
the name of containing the spread of COVID-19 at
home, the United States has been pushing ahead
with its immigration enforcement agenda, deporting
thousands of Central Americans, including those
who have been infected with the deadly virus, to
their home countries amid the ravaging pandemic.
"With little or even no sanitary measures in
place in crowded holding centres or the
deportation process, Washington's
business-as-usual approach has disregarded a
global health crisis and jeopardized the fragile
health systems in less developed countries in
Central America.
"So far, Guatemala, Haiti, Jamaica and other
Latin American countries, such as Colombia and
Mexico, have all reported infected cases among
deportees. The United States, with the world's
highest number of infections and deaths, is
accused of prompting the virus' diffusion in its
neighbouring region.
"Marvin Canahui, a 38-year-old Guatemalan
migrant, said his own experience was typical of
thousands of deportees who were held or deported
by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
during the pandemic.
"'They never even gave us hand soap or sanitizer
for disinfecting,' said Canahui, who [was recently
deported] after working in the United States for
17 years. [...]
"Except in the dining room and telephone area,
there was no cleaning or preventive measures, such
as social distancing, in the facility where he
shared a dormitory, showers and bathrooms with
about 200 other migrants from Guatemala, El
Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua, he recalled.
"'It was packed, completely full. There was no
room for more people,' said Canahui. "They (U.S.
authorities) kept bringing in prisoners. We were
totally cramped in there.'
"Before he was deported in mid-April, personnel
at the centre checked his throat with a plastic
tongue depressor, without explaining what it was
for or informing him of the result.
"After he arrived in Guatemala by air on April
14, immigration authorities there put him and
other deportees in quarantine for 14 days at a
shelter near the airport, since previous returnees
had tested positive for the virus. [...]
"A Salvadoran migrant who only gave his name as
Carlos was kept at a detention facility in Texas
from late January to early April, losing 20 kilos
of weight in the process due to existing ailments
and the poor conditions. [...]
"'There was no kind of protection or (special)
handling' and more than 80 fellow detainees 'were
not tested,' said Carlos, 31, who fled San
Salvador in January after gang members threatened
to kill him for failing to pay protection money
for his small business.
"He said he had hoped to apply for asylum in the
United States, but was caught almost immediately
by border patrol agents and sent to the 'icebox,'
slang describing the frigid holding cells to keep
detainees. [...]
"David Cruz, a 48-year-old Mexican migrant, said
he was given a face mask and his temperature was
checked when he was put in a holding cell in
McAllen, Texas, but he was held with 27 others in
'close, very close' quarters.
"He was deported in May by taking one of eight
flights designed to speed up the deportation
process to Mexico, which is usually done by ground
transport.
"The objective of these flights is to reduce the
spread of COVID-19 'to the United States,' U.S.
Customs and Border Patrol said in a statement.
"However, Latin American experts said the U.S.
move amid the COVID-19 outbreak might risk
spreading the virus to the south of the United
States, especially to the poor rural communities
many migrants come from.
"On May 4, international medical charity Doctors
Without Borders urged the United States to suspend
deportations, warning that the move could
deteriorate situations in countries poorly
equipped to deal with such crises.
"Loic Jaeger, the charity's director for Mexico
and Central America, said earlier that deporting
migrants without first checking for possible
infection was a 'criminal policy.' [...]
"According to ICE, some 943 migrants at more than
45 U.S. detention centres tested positive for
COVID-19 after 1,788 tests had been carried out.
The total number of migrants held at these centres
has reached 29,675 by the end of April.
"The United States seems to be exploiting the
pandemic to crack down on immigration, said Ruben
Figueroa, a member of the Mesoamerican Migrant
Movement that defends the human rights of Central
American migrants.
"'They are taking advantage of this time to
impose much stronger restrictions, much stricter
security measures. They are violating [the rights
of] these people, their communities, and the
countries they are from. It's clear, it's
obvious,' said Figueroa.
"In Colombia, infectious disease experts have
sounded the alarm on the U.S. move after more than
20 of 64 Colombians deported on March 30 tested
positive for COVID-19.
"Aristobulo Varon, one of the repatriated, told
local press that none of the deportees had been
tested, and the validation relied only on the fact
that they had presented no obvious symptoms of the
novel coronavirus.
"Soraya Marquez, an infectious disease expert and
coordinator of health care recovery at the Juan N.
Corpas Clinic in Bogota, said the United States
has been careless by flouting standard health
protocols amid a raging pandemic that has infected
over 6.8 million people worldwide and killed more
than 390,000.
"'I think it has totally failed, precisely for
not following protocols, since the presence of
COVID-19 has been proven in patients that are
completely asymptomatic, which is why you have to
undertake stringent measures, studies and tests to
rule out and/or confirm the diagnosis so as not to
increase the number of infections,' said Marquez.
"The U.S. performance in the pandemic has 'put
many people at risk,' she said. 'The message is
clear: life takes precedence over any other
interest.'"
On June 10, Guatemala's Foreign Ministry said
that the United States resumed deportation flights
to that country this week, after a break of one
month due to the coronavirus pandemic, teleSUR
reported. The report continues:
"Foreign ministry spokeswoman Patricia Letona
said the flights would contain groups of around 50
people, including children, and that two more were
scheduled for next week.
"Though flights with unaccompanied minors from
the U.S. have continued, general deportations by
air to Guatemala were suspended in mid-May.
"The flights have caused tensions between the
U.S. and Guatemala because dozens of people sent
back to the Latin American nation tested positive
for coronavirus. At least 186 deportees have
tested positive for COVID-19 after arriving in the
country despite the U.S. assuring they were in
good health.
"Guatemala's government said deportees would be
screened for the virus and that only its citizens
held in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) detention centres were coming back.
"'The decision [to restart flights] was made on
the basis of technical sanitary information,'
Letona said.
"The Foreign Ministry says about 5,500
Guatemalans are in the custody of ICE. More than
2,500 of those have a final deportation order and
the remainder still have a pending process.
"The administration of U.S. President Donald
Trump has pressured Guatemala to keep receiving
deported migrants despite widespread concerns
returnees are bringing coronavirus with them and
could infect remote communities.
"News of the resumption was met with resistance
from migrant advocacy groups inside Guatemala.
"Director of Casa del Migrante migrant shelter
and priest, Mauro Verzeletti, said Washington's
decision was a 'major mistake' and would not help
conditions in Guatemala.
"'This is only going to cause more racism against
the returnees in their own country,' he told
Reuters. 'We're still closed and we'll re-open
once the curve of the pandemic has come down.'"
TeleSUR informs that since the epidemic began in
Guatemala in mid-March, the country has received
2,160 deportees from the U.S. As of June 12,
Guatemala has reported a total of 8,561 cases
(6,660 active; 1,567 recovered; 334 deaths) for
rates of 478 cases per million and 19 deaths per
million.
Regarding the situation in Haiti, Steve Forester,
Immigration Policy Coordinator for the Institute
for Justice & Democracy in Haiti reports, "At
least eight of 30 Haitians deported from the U.S.
to Haiti on May 26, 2020 had been
quarantined at Louisiana's Pine Prairie facility
of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
because they had tested positive for COVID-19 in
late April and/or early May. It appears that none
of them had ever tested negative twice, if even
once, using a reliable COVID-19 test. [...]
"The 30 persons returned to Port-au-Prince on an
iAero Airways 'Swiftflight' 737 shortly after
12:30 pm on May 26 included one man who in recent
days and on the evening of May 25 had complained
to me of difficulty breathing, fever, and pain in
his chest, legs, and thighs. He was one of the
eight who had tested positive for coronavirus and
therefore been quarantined at ICE's Pine Prairie
facility.
"The eight deportees who tested positive for
COVID were transferred on the morning of May 25
from Pine Prairie to ICE's Alexandria Staging
Facility in Louisiana, where they were checked for
the coronavirus using a 'rapid test.' [...]
"We do not know how many of the other 22 persons
on the May 26 flight may also have tested positive
for COVID-19 or were not cleared per the
appropriate public health protocol.
"I spoke recently to a Haitian deported on Apr.
7. He described very crowded conditions at ICE
detention facilities and in a waiting area, with
people seated right next to each other, some
coughing and sneezing.
"He said that everyone on the deportation flight
was seated right next to each other in twos, with
no space in between them and with the aisle seats
free. A May 25 Vice News report documents
ICE's disregard for social distancing in
transporting detainees.
"Shortly before ICE's May 11 deportation flight
to Haiti, the Haitian government's scientific
advisors counselled against receiving deportations
from abroad because of the risk of spreading the
coronavirus.
"The deportation of eight persons who tested
positive for COVID, who were not cleared through
appropriate public health protocol, is another
example of why no one should be deported during
the pandemic. In engaging in such practices, the
Trump administration disrespects Haiti and the
lives of its people."
Jake Johnston, Senior Research Associate at the
Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) in
Washington, DC, also elaborated on this issue at a
forum organized by Congresswoman Frederica S.
Wilson on May 29. He explained that "Haiti is not
the only country that has received deportation
flights from the United States during the global
pandemic. Since March 13, ICE has made at least
135 deportation flights to 13 countries in Latin
America and the Caribbean. Deportees have later
tested positive in Guatemala, Jamaica, Mexico,
Colombia, and Haiti. In Guatemala, the government
has identified more than 100 COVID-19 cases among
those deported.
"The Trump administration's continued
deportations represent a significant public health
risk for the region and place a burden on already
overtaxed public health systems. The Haitian
government, for example, is forced to use scarce
resources to quarantine recent deportees while
being unable to properly quarantine its frontline
medical workers. While this is a regional issue,
there is no doubt that Haiti is one of the least
prepared countries to deal with a COVID-19
outbreak. In recent weeks, confirmed cases have
skyrocketed in Haiti, and, with one of the lowest
testing rates in the world, this most likely
represents just the tip of the iceberg."
Johnson goes on to state that "some 60 per cent
of Haiti's health services are provided by NGOs
and private actors."
As of June 13, Haiti has 3,941 total reported
cases of COVID-19 (3,853 active; 24 recovered; 64
deaths): 346 cases per million; and 6 deaths per
million. The number of total daily new cases
peaked on June 6 with 332 and had declined to 134
by June 11, while the number of active cases has
yet to peak. Haiti has been in an ongoing
political crisis since the 2004 coup against the
democratically elected government of Jean-Bertrand
Aristide, carried out by Canada, France and the
U.S. The health and political situation was
worsened by the 2010 earthquake, then the cholera
epidemic brought by UN peacekeepers. Recent
elections have been based on foreign interference
and have produced corrupt governments without any
legitimacy.
Canada is fully implicated in this situation, not
only in Haiti as it exploits Haitian asylum
seekers working courageously as frontline health
care workers, but by denying a safe haven to all
those arriving in Canada from the U.S. due to the
Safe Third Country Agreement.
Number of Cases Worldwide
As of June 13, the worldwide statistics for
COVID-19 pandemic as reported by Worldometer were:
- Total reported cases: 7,774,990. This is
1,722,729 more than the total reported on June 13
of 6,052,261. This compares to the increase in
cases in the previous week of 816,824.
- Total active cases: 3,359,023. This is 252,107
more than the number reported on June 6 of
3,106,916. The increase in total active cases
compared to the previous week was 97,238.
- Closed cases: 4,415,967. This is 653,798 more
than the number reported on June 6 of 3,762,169.
This compares to an increase in the previous week
of 719,586.
- Deaths: 428,953. This is 30,367 more deaths
than on June 6, when the toll was 398,586. This
compares to an increase in the previous week of
31,299.
- Recovered: 3,987,014. This is up 623,431 from
the June 6 figure of 3,363,583 and compares to an
increase the previous week of 688,287 recoveries.
There were 141,973 new cases on June 12, a new
all-time high, which compares to 130,529 reached
June 5. The number of new daily cases ranged
between 107,719 to 141,973 over the past week.
Overall, these figures indicate an increasing rate
of new and active cases over the previous week.
The disease was present in 213 countries and
territories, the same as the week prior. There are
29 countries/territories without active cases this
week, up from 21 the previous week. They are New
Zealand (1,504 cases 1,482 recovered; 22 deaths);
Isle of Man (336 cases; 312 recovered; 24 deaths);
Montenegro (324 cases; 315 recovered; 9 deaths);
Faeroe Islands (187 cases, all recovered);
Guadeloupe (171 cases; 157 recovered 14 deaths);
Trinidad and Tobago (117 cases; 109 recovered; 8
deaths); Aruba (101 cases; 98 recovered; 3
deaths); French Polynesia (60 cases, all
recovered); Macao (45 cases; all recovered);
Timor-Leste (24 cases, all recovered); Laos (19
cases, all recovered); Fiji (18 cases, all
recovered); Saint Kitts and Nevis (15 cases, all
recovered); Greenland (13 cases, all recovered);
the Malvinas (13 cases, all recovered); the Turks
and Caicos (12 cases; 11 recovered; 1 death); the
Seychelles (11 cases, all recovered); Montserrat
(11 cases, 10 recovered; 1 death); Papua New
Guinea (8 cases; all recovered); British Virgin
Islands (8 cases; 7 recovered; 1 death); Caribbean
Netherlands (7 cases; all recovered); St. Barth (6
cases, all recovered); Anguilla (3 cases, all
recovered); Saint Pierre et Miquelon (1 case,
recovered).
The five countries with the highest number of
cases on June 13 are noted below, accompanied by
the number of cases and deaths per million
population:
USA: 2,118,693 (1,159,752 active; 842,068
recovered; 116,873 deaths) and 6,403 cases per
million; 353 deaths per million
- June 6: 1,965,912 (1,115,789 active; 738,729
recovered; 111,394 deaths) and 5,942 cases per
million; 337 deaths per million
Brazil: 831,064 (361,502 active; 427,610
recovered; 41,952 deaths) and 3,911 cases per
million; 197 deaths per million
- June 6: 646,006 (308,875 active; 302,084
recovered; 35,047 deaths) and 3,041 cases per
million; 165 deaths per million
Russia: 520,129 (238,659 active; 274,641
recovered; 6,829 deaths) and 3,564 cases per
million; 47 deaths per million
- June 6: 458,689 (231,576 active; 221,388
recovered; 5,725 deaths) and 3,143 cases per
million; 39 deaths per million
India: 310,760 (146,575 active; 155,290
recovered; 8,895 deaths) and 225 cases per
million; 6 deaths per million
- June 6: 237,566 (116,843 active; 114,073
recovered; 6,650 deaths) and 172 cases per
million; 5 deaths per million
UK: 292,950 (active and recovered N/A;
41,481 deaths) and 4,316 cases per million; 611
deaths per million
- June 6: 283,311 (active and recovered N/A;
40,261 deaths) and 4,175 cases per million; 593
deaths per million
Of the 10 countries with the highest number of
cases, the U.S. number of new cases remains
similar to the previous week -- about 20,000 per
day. In Russia the number of new daily cases has
also been stable over the previous few weeks at
about 8,500. In Brazil and India, the number of
new daily cases is still rising sharply. Brazil,
with more than 30,000 new daily cases in the past
week, looks like it will reach about 1.1 million
cases by next week. India which is adding more
than 10,000 new cases per day, may reach 400,000
by next week. The European countries overall have
had a marked decline in new daily cases and daily
deaths.
Beyond the absolute numbers, the number of cases
and deaths per million population also shed light
on how well or badly countries are doing. For
example, Brazil's number of cases is high --
second only to the U.S. now -- at 831,064. But
taking into account the size of its population
(212,459,250) its rate of deaths at 197 per
million is still lower than many European
countries. Brazil's rate of deaths is also lower
than Canada's 213 per million.
Russia's rate of deaths is low (47 per million)
in spite of it having the third highest number of
cases worldwide. On the other hand, Belgium, the
headquarters of prominent supranational
institutions such as the EU and NATO, has a very
high rate of deaths (833 per million), the highest
in the world for any country with more than a
million population.
Reports from India indicate it now has the fourth
highest number of cases. Given its large
population this means that it has a relatively low
number of cases and deaths per
million. However, it is suspected that
reporting may not be indicative of true numbers.
Peru with the eighth highest number of cases in
the world (220,749) -- almost twice as many as
Canada's, and with more than double the number of
cases per million than Canada -- still has a lower
death rate of 191 per million than Canada.
Cases in Top Five Countries by Region
In Europe on June 13, the four other European
countries with the highest number of reported
cases after the UK, listed above, are Spain,
Italy, Germany and France:
Spain: 290,289 (active and recovered N/A;
27,136 deaths) and 6,209 cases per million; 580
deaths per million
- June 6: 288,058 (active and recovered N/A;
27,134 deaths) and 6,161 cases per million; 580
deaths per million
Italy: 236,305 (28,997 active; 173,085
recovered; 34,223 deaths) and 3,908 cases per
million; 566 deaths per million
- June 6: 234,531 (36,976 active; 163,781
recovered; 33,774 deaths) and 3,879 cases per
million; 559 deaths per million
Germany: 187,256 (6,493 active; 171,900
recovered; 8,863 deaths) and 2,235 cases per
million; 106 deaths per million
- June 6: 185,414 (7,751 active; 168,900
recovered; 8,763 deaths) and 2,213 cases per
million; 105 deaths per million
France: 156,287 (54,341 active; 72,572
recovered; 29,374 deaths) and 2,395 cases per
million; 450 deaths per million
- June 6: 153,055 (53,440 active; 70,504
recovered; 29,111 deaths) and 2,345 cases per
million; 446 deaths per million
In Spain, news agencies report that 104
passengers who landed in Spain in the past month
have tested positive for COVID-19 despite travel
restrictions. Most of these passengers were from
the U.S. and Latin America. The head of Spain's
health emergencies' committee Fernando Simón told
journalists on June 11 that the 'imported'
COVID-19 cases represented between 10 to 12 per
cent of new infections in Spain since May 11.
Spain is preparing to welcome tourists from
Europe by July 1 (or earlier if an agreement is
reached between Spanish Prime Minister Pedro
Sánchez and his EU counterparts). At present, only
Spanish citizens, legal residents and workers,
those who have a cross-border job, or people from
international organizations who have come to help
with Spain's COVID-19 pandemic are allowed in.
On June 11, the European Commission asked all EU
countries to reopen their borders to all EU
citizens as of Monday, June 15, a recommendation
that was addressed in particular to Spain as "one
of the countries that's dragging its heels the
most in this regard," The Local reported.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has
reiterated he will maintain the 14-day quarantine
for people arriving in Spain at least until July
1.
Regarding British tourists to Spain -- 18 million
of whom visited in 2019 -- the Spanish government
has said it will not consider a travel corridor
with the UK, preferring instead a common EU
criteria when it comes to tourism agreements.
France will end special government powers brought
in to deal with the coronavirus pandemic on July
10 though it will retain the ability to curb
gatherings and freedom of movement for four
months, Reuters reported on June 10.
France passed "state of health emergency"
legislation in March which gave the government the
power to restrict civil liberties by decree
without parliamentary approval. Current statistics
indicate that the severity of the pandemic
continues to lessen, despite the progressive
lifting of lockdown measures, with shops, holiday
resorts and tourist attractions slowly reopening.
People are still being encouraged to wear face
masks when outside and stay at least one metre
apart while most employees are continuing to work
from home where possible. France is now reported
to have a surplus of facemasks.
In Eurasia on June 13, Russia tops the list of
five countries with the highest cases in the
region, with the figures reported above, followed
by:
Turkey: 175,218 (21,338 active; 149,102
recovered; 4,778 deaths) and 2,079 cases per
million; 57 deaths per million
- June 6: 168,340 (30,292 active; 133,400
recovered; 4,648 deaths) and 1,998 cases per
million; 55 deaths per million
Armenia: 16,004 (9,659 active; 6,081
recovered; 264 deaths) and 5,401 cases per
million; 89 deaths per million
- June 6: 12,364 (8,454 active; 3,720 recovered;
190 deaths) and 4,173 cases per million; 64 deaths
per million
Kazakhstan: 14,238 (5,339 active; 8,829
recovered; 70 deaths) and 759 cases per million; 4
deaths per million
- June 6: 12,511 (5,556 active; 6,903 recovered;
52 deaths) and 667 cases per million; 3 deaths per
million
Azerbaijan: 9,218 (3,989 active; 5,116
recovered; 13 deaths) and 910 cases per million;
11 deaths per million
- June 6: 6,860 (2,907 active; 3,871 recovered; 82
deaths) and 677 cases per million; 8 deaths per
million
In West Asia on June 13:
Iran: 184,955 (29,477 active; 146,748
recovered; 8,730 deaths) and 2,204 cases per
million; 104 deaths per million
- June 6: 167,156 (29,281 active; 129,741
recovered; 8,134 deaths) and 1,992 cases per
million; 97 deaths per million
Saudi Arabia: 123,308 (39,828 active;
82,548 recovered; 932 deaths) and 3,545 cases per
million; 27 deaths per million
- June 6: 95,748 (24,490 active; 70,616 recovered;
642 deaths) and 2,753 cases per million; 18 deaths
per million
Qatar: 78,416 (23,094 active; 55,252
recovered; 70 deaths) and 27,928 cases per
million; 25 deaths per million
- June 6: 65,495 (24,511 active; 40,935 recovered;
49 deaths) and 23,326 cases per million; 17 deaths
per million
UAE: 41,990 (14,941 active; 26,761
recovered; 288 deaths) and 4,248 cases per
million; 29 deaths per million
- June 6: 37,642 (17,031 active; 20,337 recovered;
274 deaths) and 3,809 cases per million; 28 deaths
per million
Kuwait: 35,466 (9,295 active; 25,882
recovered; 289 deaths) and 8,311 cases per
million; 68 deaths per million
- June 6: 30,644 (12,123 active; 18,277 recovered;
244 deaths) and 7,183 cases per million; 57 deaths
per million
Speaking at a meeting of Iran's National
Headquarters for Managing and Fighting the
coronavirus in Tehran on June 13, President Hassan
Rouhani says the country will restore the strict
restrictions put in place in the first days of the
pandemic if it is forced to do so for the sake of
the people's safety.
Discussing the situation in Iranian provinces
with regard to the outbreak, President Rouhani
said that many have passed the first infection
peak and their situation is no longer an
emergency, but several others are still about to
pass it, raising concerns about a drop in people's
observance of health protocols.
"In the Persian month of Ordibehesht [April
20-May 21], people cooperated better in
implementing heath guidelines and we witnessed a
proper situation, but in the middle of the month
of Khordad, the observance level decreased from
about 80 to 20 percent; it could be worrying,"
Rouhani added.
Iran reported its first COVID-19 infection cases
in late February and soon afterwards introduced
lockdown restrictions and social distancing
measures to rein in the pandemic.
In recent weeks, as the infection and mortality
rates have declined, the government has eased
certain restrictions and reopened businesses and
public places.
"All these re-openings are conditional on
collective cooperation. If we are forced to, we
will restore the restrictions. If a peak returns
to a province, we have to restore the restrictions
of the first weeks. If the health of the people in
a city or a province is endangered, we have no
option but to restore the restrictions. If we want
the restrictions to reduce, we must observe all
principles," Rouhani said.
President Rouhani said that museums and
historical sites will reopen on June 14 and
shrines on June 15, while all workers will return
to work on June 20.
"The coronavirus had caused problems for us, but
it also created opportunities. It mobilized all
government branches, political parties and groups,
forming a national coalition for health and
livelihood, i.e. a national coalition for life.
That is a great achievement," Rouhani said. "The
experience gained over the past months tells us
that we will prevail against both the coronavirus
and sanctions if we stand together and join
hands."
Illegal U.S. sanctions on Iran have hampered its
ability to adequately respond to the pandemic and
prevented the country from purchasing life-saving
medical items from abroad.
In South Asia on June 13:
India: 310,760 (146,575 active; 155,290
recovered; 8,895 deaths) and 225 cases per
million; 6 deaths per million
- June 6: 237,566 (116,843 active; 114,073
recovered; 6,650 deaths) and 172 cases per
million; 5 deaths per million
Pakistan: 132,405 (79,798 active; 50,056
recovered; 2,551 deaths) and 600 cases per
million; 12 deaths per million
- June 6: 93,983 (59,467 active; 32,581 recovered;
1,935 deaths) and 426 cases per million; 9 deaths
per million
Bangladesh: 84,379 (65,413 active; 17,827
recovered; 1,139 deaths) and 513 cases per
million; 7 deaths per million
- June 6: 63,026 (48,855 active; 13,325 recovered;
846 deaths) and 383 cases per million; 5 deaths
per million
Afghanistan: 24,102 (19,450 active; 4,201
recovered; 451 deaths) and 620 cases per million;
12 deaths per million
- June 6: 19,551 (17,411 active; 1,820 recovered;
320 deaths) and 503 cases per million; 8 deaths
per million
Sri Lanka: 1,882 (619 active; 1,252
recovered; 11 deaths) and 88 cases per million;
0.5 deaths per million
- June 6: 1,801 (899 active; 891 recovered; 11
deaths) and 84 cases per million; 0.5 deaths per
million
In India on June 10 there were confirmed 12,375
new cases, an all-time high, while on June 11
there were 394 deaths, also an all-time high.
Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, and New Delhi are the
worst-hit states. India has so far tested more
than 4.9 million people, with a daily capacity of
more than 140,000. The increasing rate of daily
new cases comes as the government moves forward
with reopening restaurants, shopping malls, and
places of worship in most of India after a
lockdown that lasted more than two months. The
government has already partially restored train
services and domestic flights and authorized shops
and manufacturing to reopen. Subways, hotels,
schools, and colleges, however, remain closed
nationwide. The number of new cases has soared
since the government began easing restrictions.
There has also been an increase in infections in
rural India following the return of hundreds of
thousands of migrant workers who lost their jobs
during the lockdown.
Regarding the situation of India's workers, the
global union IndustriALL reported on June 9 that
unions are intensifying their struggle against the
Modi government's failure to protect workers'
interests during the COVID-19 lockdown and its
aggressive attacks on workers' rights. A day of
non-cooperation is announced for July 3.
The unions are demanding:
- A cash transfer of Rs. 7500 (U.S.$ 99.50) to
all households below the income tax level for
April, May and June
- Wages for workers at medium, small and micro
enterprises paid for the same months
- Universal food distribution to all working
people for at least six months
- Safe journey for millions of migrant workers
IndustriALL writes: "It is estimated that around
240 million workers have lost their livelihood.
Although factories are restarting operations, many
are taking on fewer workers and reducing their
wages.
"The ILO has warned that about 400 million people
might be pushed into deeper poverty. Unions are
demanding increased support for the rural
employment scheme to create employment
opportunities for the millions of migrant workers
who have returned to their villages, and for
similar schemes to in urban areas as well.
"The government has used the pandemic to
introduce anti-worker labour law changes, and to
announce corporate friendly policy measures
including privatization of public sector
enterprises (PSEs), many of which serve critical
national interests, public purpose and were
established with enormous public fund. The
announcement also included decisions to the pay
benefits for 4.8 million central government
employees and 6.8 million pensioners.
"Unions underline that the government's U.S.$265
billion stimulus package is a cruel joke on
working people. The actual relief package is
paltry and a major chunk of the amount consists of
loan guarantees to various sectors.
"Dr. G Sanjeeva Reddy, President of Indian
National Trade Union Congress and IndustriALL
Executive Committee member, says:
"'The government's insensitive handling of the
lockdown and its anti-worker policy announcements
show that it does not respect workers' rights and
does not deserve the cooperation of working
people. The inaction has caused untold misery to
millions of workers.
"'After the massive countrywide protest on May
22, we are now intensifying our protests with a
call for non-cooperation on July 3 to ensure that
the government address our demands.'
"Valter Sanches, IndustriALL General Secretary,
says:
"'We are concerned that the Modi government is
taking advantage of the pandemic to attack
workers' rights and the anti-worker labour law
changes must be withdrawn. The government should
take urgent steps to protect the livelihood of
millions of workers and engage in genuine social
dialogue with the unions for solutions.'
"'IndustriALL stands in solidarity with the
Indian union movement and will take international
solidarity actions to support their efforts.'"
An example of how Indian employers are abusing
workers during the pandemic is the situation of
women garment workers at Euro Clothing Company
ECC-2, India, a supplier to global fashion brands
like H&M, who staged an overnight sit-in at
the factory on June 8-9, protesting against the
illegal lay-offs of 1,200 workers. On June 8,
IndustriALL reported that "management at Euro
Clothing Company, owned by Gokuldas Exports Group,
announced a lay-off of 1,200 workers, in clear
violation of the labour law. In Indian labour law,
lay-off is an act by which there is no production
and workers are paid 50 per cent of their
salaries. According to the law, a permission from
the government is needed for lay-offs in
workplaces with more than 100 workers.
"Union busting at the factory had begun a few
weeks earlier. With the easing of the lockdown,
industries were allowed to resume operations on
May 5 and workers reported for duty, despite
difficulties as public transport had not
restarted.
"Only 30 per cent of the workers were provided
work. They were paid 50 per cent of the wages for
the period they worked. No wages were paid at all
during the lockdown to any of the workers of
ECC-2.
"During the night of May 30, management started
removing machines without informing the workers or
the union, and only stopped when workers gathered
at the gate, blocking the removal.
"However, management continued to remove
machines, provided work only in the ironing
section, and put up a notice that only 50 per cent
of the workers would be provided work. Remaining
workers would either be transferred to other
factories of the group or laid off.
"[...] The union says the actions are not
business related; it is a clear case of union
busting. The matter has now been brought before
the labour department of the state government."
IndustriALL General Secretary Valter Sanches
stated, "We commend the courage of the workers
fighting for their jobs. We strongly oppose the
illegal actions of the management, especially as
we see a trend to close unionized factories and
retrench union members using the COVID-19 crisis
as an excuse."
Regarding the situation of India's millions of
migrant workers, India's Supreme Court on June 9
ordered states to identify stranded migrant
workers and transport them back to their hometowns
within 15 days as the humanitarian crisis
surrounding their movement has continued over
weeks of the coronavirus lockdown. It also
directed the state governments to consider
withdrawing cases filed against the workers under
the Disaster Management Act for lockdown
violations, including crowding at rail stations,
legal news website Live Law reported. The court
also asked federal and state governments to
formulate a scheme for providing employment to the
migrants and establish help desks to give them
jobs after mapping their skills, the report said.
Al Jazeera reports, "A number of migrant deaths
on the road have been reported, both from exposure
to the sweltering heat and a lack of food and
water."
In Southeast Asia on June 13:
Singapore: 40,197 (12,132 active; 28,040
recovered; 25 deaths) and 6,874 cases per million;
4 deaths per million
- June 6: 37,527 (13,294 active; 24,209 recovered;
24 deaths) and 6,418 cases per million; 4 deaths
per million
Indonesia: 37,420 (21,553 active; 13,776
recovered; 2,091 deaths) and 137 cases per
million; 8 deaths per million
- June 6: 30,514 (18,806 active; 9,907 recovered;
1,801 deaths) and 112 cases per million; 7 deaths
per million
Philippines: 25,392 (18,612 active; 5,706
recovered; 1,074 deaths) and 232 cases per
million; 10 deaths per million
- June 6: 21,340 (15,905 active; 4,441 recovered;
994 deaths) and 195 cases per million; 9 deaths
per million
Malaysia: 8,445 (1,014 active; 7,311
recovered; 120 deaths) and 261 cases per million;
4 deaths per million
- June 6: 8,303 (1,551 active; 6,635 recovered;
117 deaths) and 257 cases per million; 4 deaths
per million
Thailand: 3,134 (89 active; 2,987
recovered; 58 deaths) and 45 cases per million;
0.8 deaths per million
- June 6: 3,104 (75 active; 2,971 recovered; 58
deaths) and 44 cases per million; 0.8 deaths per
million
Laos, after 59 consecutive days with no COVID-19
new cases, discharged its 19th and last patient,
and without reporting any deaths, became the first
country in Southeast Asia to declare itself free
of COVID-19 on June 10.
At a press conference, Prime Minister Thongloun
Sisoulith pointed out that this is an important
victory, but in no way guarantees immunity against
the virus, so he called on all institutions to
work to prevent their spread.
He stressed that the appropriate government
measures and the responsibility with which the
citizens fought the pandemic, together with the
support of international organizations and
friendly countries, allowed Laos to become the
first nation in Southeast Asia to put the pandemic
under absolute control.
Sisoulith announced that his government will
continue evaluating the epidemiological situation
and will establish punctual preventive and control
measures, in transit towards a 'new normalcy' that
includes the progressive recovery of productive
activities, economy and the social life in
general.
Laos was one of the nations in Southeast Asia
that took the longest to fall into the whirlwind
of the pandemic (with its first case on March 24),
the Prime Minister said, but the immediate closure
of the country to foreign visitors, other timely
containment measures, isolation and prompt
treatment of the infected prevented the spread of
illness.
Along with Vietnam and Cambodia, it has also had
no deaths from COVID-19.
In East Asia on June 13:
China: 83,075 (74 active; 78,367
recovered; 4,634 deaths) and 58 cases per million;
3 deaths per million
- June 6: 83,030 (67 active; 78,329 recovered;
4,634 deaths) and 58 cases per million; 3 deaths
per million
Japan: 17,332 (917 active; 15,493
recovered; 922 ) and 137 cases per million; 7
deaths per million
- June 6: 17,064 (1,185 active; 14,972 recovered;
907 deaths) and 135 cases per million; 7 deaths
per million
South Korea: 12,051 (1,083 active; 10,691
recovered; 277 deaths) and 235 cases per million;
5 deaths per million
- June 6: 11,719 (915 active; 10,531 recovered;
273 deaths) and 229 cases per million; 5 deaths
per million
Taiwan: 443 (5 active; 431 recovered; 7
deaths) and 19 cases per million; 0.3 deaths per
million
- June 6: 443 (7 active; 429 recovered; 7 deaths)
and 19 cases per million; 0.3 deaths per million
In North America on June 13:
USA: 2,118,693 (1,159,752 active; 842,068
recovered; 116,873 deaths) and 6,403 cases per
million; 353 deaths per million
- June 6: 1,965,912 (1,115,789 active; 738,729
recovered; 111,394 deaths) and 5,942 cases per
million; 337 deaths per million
Mexico: 139,196 (20,981 active; 101,767
recovered; 16,448 deaths) and 1,080 cases per
million; 128 deaths per million
- June 6: 110,026 (18,266 active; 78,590
recovered; 13,170 deaths) and 854 cases per
million; 102 deaths per million
Canada: 98,368 (30,930 active; 59,333
recovered; 8,105 deaths) and 2,607 cases per
million; 215 deaths per million
- June 6: 94,790 (34,120 active; 52,932 recovered;
7,738 deaths) and 2,513 cases per million; 205
deaths per million
Although Mexico has now overtaken Canada for the
second highest number of COVID-19 cases in North
America, Mexico's population is more than three
times Canada's. When that is factored in, Mexico
has a much lower rate of COVID-19 cases (854 per
million) than Canada's 2,513 per million, and for
deaths as well (102 per million vs. 205).
On June 9, news agencies reported that Canada and
the United States are set to extend a ban on
non-essential travel to late July.
In the U.S., a report issued by the U.S. Labor
Department on June 10 indicates that employers
laid off 7.7 million workers in April, as the
COVID-19 pandemic has forced thousands of jobs to
close. In May, the federal unemployment rate
dropped for the first time since the coronavirus
sent the economy into a tailspin. Nevertheless,
experts remark that, as of May, the country hadn't
seen unemployment rise this sharply since 1948
when the federal government started measuring this
kind of data.
It is estimated that 21 million people remain out
of work in the U.S. During the first three weeks
of April, nearly 17 million people had filed
initial claims for unemployment insurance, a
figure far more than the peak during the Great
Recession, back in 2009.
The figures from April, according to U.S. Bureau
of Labor Statistics, also show that Nevada,
Michigan, and Hawaii, in this order, are the worse
hit by unemployment, while Connecticut is at the
bottom of the list.
Unemployment has impacted all sectors heavily --
however, leisure and hospitality record most job
losses.
April also saw a significant shift regarding
gender statistics as the numbers show that the
unemployment rate was 2.5 per cent higher for
women than men.
On June 10, the number of confirmed coronavirus
cases in the U.S. passed the two-million mark.
News reports indicate that the pandemic hotspots
appear to be shifting from large urban centres
like New York City and Chicago toward smaller,
rural areas. States that have loosened
restrictions have also seen resurgences in cases.
"The one million most recent cases were added
over the course of over a month after the U.S.
surpassed a million confirmed cases on April 28.
On average, the country has reported more than
20,000 cases a day since then," Global News
reports.
Twenty-one states reported weekly increases in
new cases of COVID-19 as of June 10 -- Arizona,
Utah and New Mexico all had increases of 40 per
cent or more for the week ending June 7, compared
with the prior seven days, according to a Reuters
analysis. One June 6, 14 states recorded their
highest-ever seven-day average of new cases since
the start of the pandemic, according to data
tracked by the Washington
Post. Those states include Arizona,
California, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi and
Utah. These are among the states that have
loosened pandemic restrictions. Global News
reports that:
"Arizona was among the first states to reopen in
mid-May, and its cases have increased 115 per cent
since then, leading a former state health chief to
warn that a new stay-at-home order or field
hospitals may be needed. California has put half
its population on a watch list comprised of
counties that have seen upticks.
"Texas, which is also among those 14 states, has
continually reported record-high hospitalizations
due to the disease. On Tuesday [June 9], health
officials reported more than 2,000 patients were
in hospital.
"Johns Hopkins University on Monday [June 8]
found 22 states, including Michigan and Arizona,
had seen at least small daily upticks in new
cases. Virginia, Rhode Island and Nebraska showed
the greatest decreases, the school's data showed.
"The number of new infections around the U.S.
rose three per cent in the first week of June --
the first increase after five weeks of declines,
according to an analysis of data from the COVID
Tracking Project, a volunteer-run organization.
"Yet even those rises and declines likely don't
tell the true story of the pandemic. The number of
infections and deaths related to COVID-19, as is
the case around the world, is believed to be far
higher than official data indicates thanks to
shortages in testing.
"Health officials have continued to stress the
importance of widespread testing and contact
tracing to ensure any resurgence of the virus is
caught early, while allowing the economy to
reopen.
"But the Trump administration has yet to produce
a plan that has satisfied both parties in
Congress, leaving it up to states to ramp up
testing.
"The White House's coronavirus task force still
meets and collects data but has shifted its focus
towards reopening the economy on U.S. President
Donald Trump's orders. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the
nation's leading infectious disease expert, told
CNN last week that he had not spoken to Trump in
two weeks."
In Central America and the Caribbean on June 13:
Dominican Republic: 22,572 (8,911 active;
13,084 recovered; 577 deaths) and 2,082 cases per
million; 53 deaths per million
- June 6: 18,708 (6,447 active; 11,736 recovered;
525 deaths) and 1,726 cases per million; 48 deaths
per million
Panama: 19,211 (5,031 active; 13,759
recovered; 421 deaths) and 4,456 cases per
million; 98 deaths per million
- June 6: 15,463 (5,374 active; 9,719 recovered;
370 deaths) and 3,588 cases per million; 86 deaths
per million
Guatemala: 8,982 (6,929 active; 1,702
recovered; 351 deaths) and 502 cases per million;
20 deaths per million
- June 6: 6,485 (5,216 active; 1,053 recovered;
216 deaths) and 362 cases per million; 12 deaths
per million
Honduras: 8,132 (6,932 active; 844
recovered; 306 deaths) and 854 cases per million;
31 deaths per million
- June 6: 5,971 (5,046 active; 677 recovered; 248
deaths) and 604 cases per million; 25 deaths per
million
Haiti: 3,941 (3,853 active; 24 ; 64
deaths) and 346 cases per million; 6 deaths per
million
Cuban journalist and editor in chief of
Cubadebate, Rosa Miriam Elizalde writes from
Havana where she is in quarantine:
"I am writing these lines from one of the
isolation centers for those who have been in
contact with COVID-19 cases that do not present
symptoms of the disease. The rapid test is
negative, but I still have to stay in quarantine
for 14 days until I pass the test that detects and
quantifies the virus.
"The house's balcony overlooks the sea on Havana’s
west coast, with its blue depths and the cool
morning breeze that blows even on the hottest
summer days over the hills surrounding the city.
The place is spacious and clean. There are 10 of
us housed here, including two children, cared for
by a tiny group of workers who live in quarantine
with us and juggle to make the floors shine,
change clothes and masks regularly, and make the
daily rice and beans look different. There are no
luxuries, but the essentials are there, and that
includes a doctor and an intensive care nurse who
live on the second floor of the house who keeps an
eye on our temperature and blood pressure several
times a day. At the slightest sign of alarm, the
suspect is transferred to a hospital, something
which, fortunately, has not happened in our house
overlooking the sea.
"In Havana alone, there are 26 such isolation
centers for those who have had direct contact with
infected people or have returned to the country on
humanitarian flights, which have been maintained
despite the closure of the borders.
"Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has
indicated that Latin America is the new centre of
the pandemic, the cases on the island are in free
fall and no deaths have been reported in the last
12 days. Cubans are now 24 times less likely to
contract the virus than Dominicans, 27 times less
than Mexicans and more than 70 times less than
Brazilians, reported the British newspaper The
Guardian this week.
"For Rubén González Duany, the doctor who is
treating us and whose eyes are all that I have
seen since I have been in quarantine, the result
is not the work of a miracle. It is due to the
early detection of carriers, hospitalization and
the application of experimental treatments, most
of which have been developed by the nation’s own
biotechnology sector. The combination of the
scientific method, decades of investment in a
strong public health system and the age-old remedy
of social quarantine has worked. Without immediate
vaccination, the goal is to regulate the rate of
change in cases as best as possible."
In South America on June 13:
Brazil: 832,866 (363,201 active; 427,610
recovered; 42,055 deaths) and 3,920 cases per
million; 198 deaths per million
- June 6: 646,006 (308,875 active; 302,084
recovered; 35,047 deaths) and 3,041 cases per
million; 165 deaths per million
Peru: 220,749 (107,308 active; 107,133
recovered; 6,308 deaths) and 6,700 cases per
million; 191 deaths per million
- June 6: 187,400 (103,024 active; 79,214
recovered; 5,162 deaths) and 5,689 cases per
million; 157 deaths per million
Chile: 167,355 (26,958 active; 137,296
recovered; 3,101 deaths) and 8,758 cases per
million; 162 deaths per million
- June 6: 122,499 (25,420 active; 95,631
recovered; 1,448 deaths) and 6,412 cases per
million; 76 deaths per million
Colombia: 46,858 (26,598 active; 18,715
recovered; 1,545 deaths) and 921 cases per
million; 30 deaths per million
- June 6: 36,635 (21,852 active; 13,638 recovered;
1,145 deaths) and 721 cases per million; 23 deaths
per million
Ecuador: 46,356 (19,617 active; 22,865
recovered; 3,874 deaths) and 2,630 cases per
million; 220 deaths per million
- June 6: 41,575 (17,473 active; 20,568 recovered;
3,534 deaths) and 2,359 cases per million; 201
deaths per million
Latin America has become the new COVID-19
pandemic epicentre, World Health Organization
(WHO) Emergencies Program Executive Director
Michael Ryan informed during a media briefing on
June 10.
"What we are seeing, with some notable
exceptions, is a trend of cases to increase, from
Mexico to Chile. This is a time of great concern,
and it is a time when we need strong government
leadership as well as great solidarity with the
region to control this disease. It's not just one
country, but many countries that are facing severe
outbreaks," he warned.
Ryan informed that the Americas holds five of the
ten countries with the highest number of COVID-19
cases over the past 24 hours: Brazil, the United
States, Peru, Chile, and Mexico.
He also referred to the pressure health systems
in the region are exposed to, something that,
along with the contagion increase, puts the WHO in
the most delicate situation this health body has
faced since the pandemic outbreak.
"I would certainly characterize that Central and
South America, in particular, have very much
become the intense zones of transmission for this
virus as we speak, and I don't believe that we
have reached the peak in that transmission. And at
this point, I cannot predict when we will," he
said.
Despite this, Ryan assured that Central and South
America have a long and successful history when it
comes to fighting for health. "What we want to see
is governments working together to once again
demonstrate to the world the capabilities that
these countries have, as well as their ability to
work individually and cooperatively to end
infectious diseases," he said.
In Brazil, the Bolsonaro government has begun
withholding publication of data on the pandemic.
teleSUR reports that on June 6, there was a
several-hour blackout on the Brazilian Ministry of
Health page that showed information on the virus
in real time, following which information on the
cumulative number of infected and deceased in the
country was deleted. The website now only shows
the figures for the previous 24 hours. President
Jair Bolsonaro justified the changes saying they
were aimed at avoiding "underreporting" and
"inconsistencies."
WHO Director Michael Ryan said that "it is very
important that there be consistent transparency in
government statistics on the situation of COVID-19
in the country." Ryan added that it is expected
that "we can count on our partners in Brazil to
pass that information on to us, and more
importantly, pass it on to their citizens. They
need to know what is going on."
It is uncertain whether Bolivia, with a
relatively small toll of 487 coronavirus deaths,
but with a high number of infections registered in
recent weeks, will hold its general election
delayed already for months, on September 6 as
approved by the country's Congress. On June 12
Jeanine Añez, the de facto President brought to
power by a U.S.-backed coup, refused to promulgate
the law setting the date for the election, asking
the Congress to justify its decision by providing
an epidemiological study to show it would be safe
to hold elections in September.
Chile has extended the quarantines that were
already in force and added eight new zones to the
measure starting June 11. On Saturday Health
Minister Jaime Manalich resigned after facing
criticism for his unsatisfactory management of the
pandemic and calling for the establishment of a
"new normal" while the number of cases and deaths
continued to steadily rise.
Ecuador, despite its 3,720 recorded and 2,462
probable deaths from COVID-19, in addition to
44,440 confirmed cases, has begun relaxation of
lockdown measures.
Venezuela continues to merit
recognition for its success at containing the
virus. Despite its number of cases increasing
dramatically from a few hundred just under a
month ago to 2,904 on June 13, Venezuela
continues to have a much lower number of cases
per million (102) and by far the lowest number
of deaths per million (0.8) in South America. In
spite of this consistent record achieved by
mobilizing all the resources of its public
health system and the organized Venezuelan
people, the U.S., Canada and their Lima Group
are going to great lengths to create the
impression that the country is in the midst of a
pandemic-related crisis and needs foreign
intervention to remove a government running
circles around all of them in containing the
spread of the coronavirus and saving people's
lives.
The surge in COVID-19 cases
in Venezuela over the past several weeks is
largely the result of Venezuelan migrants
returning from Brazil, Colombia, Peru and other
countries where they had gone to seek better
economic opportunities as the U.S. economic
sanctions took their toll, as intended, on the
daily lives of the working people. These
"imported" cases now represent 80 per cent of
all Venezuela’s cases, to which the government
has responded by instituting strict protocols at
all border crossings to ensure everyone is
tested, quarantines are applied, with check-up
and treatment provided to all those who need it.
Over the past two weeks
Venezuela has adopted a phased-in easing of the
quarantine it adopted as soon as the first cases
were detected in mid-March. It began with a few
hours on weekends for children and seniors to go
out for walks and exercise then moved to a
partial opening of the economy which had been
shut down for all but essential public services
and food production and distribution. Under what
is called the 5+10 Plan, a range of personal
services, certain retail businesses, auto
repairs and industries such as those producing
footwear, textiles and chemicals were allowed to
open on a staggered schedule for five days,
followed by 10 days of voluntary "disciplined
and rigorous" quarantine.
Beginning the week of June 8
the easing moved to a 7+7 schedule -- seven days
of work followed by seven days of quarantine. On
June 15, the quarantine is slated to be eased
further to allow for engaging in individual
sports, without spectators, and such things as
the reopening of gyms and certain businesses in
shopping centers. Municipalities under
curfew because of outbreaks and in border areas
adjacent to Colombia and Brazil continue to
remain exempt from this easing up of the
quarantine at this time.
In a new development, the
week of June 8 the Venezuelan government
announced it had signed an agreement with
representatives of opposition parties to work
together in combatting COVID-19 in such areas as
the detection of new cases, timely treatment of
infected persons, supervision of quarantines and
protecting health personnel, among others. The
parties also agreed to accept the "technical and
administrative assistance" of the Pan-American
Health Organization (PAHO) and to cooperate with
it to secure "financial resources that
contribute to the strengthening of the country's
response capacity." The fictitious "government"
of deputy Juan Guaidó also specifically agreed
to make available "with the approval of the
government of Nicolás Maduro" access to $10
million in funds to finance PAHO's work in the
country. That would be funds which already
belong to the Venezuelan people but have been
seized and held unlawfully by governments and
financial institutions in the U.S. and Europe to
finance the activities of violent coup forces
they have put into motion.
In Africa on June 13:
South Africa: 65,736 (27,463 active;
36,850 recovered; 1,423 deaths) and 1,109 cases
per million; 24 deaths per million
- June 6: 43,434 (19,438 active; 23,088 recovered;
908 deaths) and 733 cases per million; 15 deaths
per million
Egypt: 42,980 (29,967 active; 11,529
recovered; 1,484 deaths) and 420 cases per
million; 15 deaths per million
- June 6: 31,115 (21,791 active; 8,158 recovered;
1,166 deaths) and 31 cases per million; 11 deaths
per million
Nigeria: 15,181 (9,891 active; 4,891
recovered; 399 deaths) and 74 cases per million; 2
deaths per million
- June 6: 11,844 (7,815 active; 3,696 recovered;
333 deaths) and 58 cases per million; 2 deaths per
million
Ghana: 11,118 (7,091 active; 3,979
recovered; 48 deaths) and 358 cases per million; 2
deaths per million
Algeria: 10,810 (2,630 active; 7,420 ; 760
deaths) and 247 cases per million; 17 deaths per
million
- June 6: 9,935 (2,792 active; 6,453 recovered;
690 deaths) and 227 cases per million; 16 deaths
per million
The coronavirus pandemic is accelerating in
Africa, spreading to the hinterland from capital
cities where it arrived with travelers, the World
Health Organization said on June 11. However, the
WHO said there was no indication that severe cases
and deaths were being missed, nor has the virus
caused significant infections in refugee camps
across the continent.
Ten countries account for 75 per cent of the some
207,600 cases on the continent, with 5,000 deaths
reported, according to Matshidiso Moeti, WHO's
Africa regional director. South Africa, which last
month began a phased easing of the lockdown, is
the hardest-hit, accounting for a quarter of all
cases, she said.
"Even though these cases in Africa account for
less than 3 percent of the global total, it's
clear that the pandemic is accelerating," Moeti
told a news briefing for Geneva-based UN
correspondents. "We believe that large numbers of
severe cases and deaths are not being missed in
Africa."
Africa's population is relatively youthful and
many countries had already established "point of
entry" screening measures against Ebola fever --
two factors which may have so far limited the
spread of COVID-19, she said.
But lockdowns and market closures intended to
contain coronavirus contagion have taken a heavy
toll on marginalized communities and low-income
families, Moeti said.
In South Africa, high numbers of daily cases and
deaths are being reported in two provinces, the
Western Cape and Eastern Cape, she said, adding:
"Specifically in the Western Cape where we are
seeing a majority of cases and deaths, the trend
seem to be similar to what was happening in Europe
and in the U.S."
A major challenge on the continent remains the
availability of test kits, Moeti said.
"Until such time as we have access to an
effective vaccine, I'm afraid we'll probably have
to live with a steady increase in the region, with
some hotspots having to be managed in a number of
countries, as is happening now in South Africa,
Algeria, Cameroon for example, which require very
strong public health measures, social distancing
measures to take place."
In Oceania on June 13:
Australia: 7,302 (388 active; 6,812
recovered; 102 deaths) and 287 cases per million;
4 deaths per million
- June 6: 7,255 (463 active; 6,690 recovered; 102
deaths) and 285 cases per million; 4 deaths per
million
New Zealand: 1,504 (0 active; 1,482
recovered; 22 deaths) and 301 cases per million; 4
deaths per million
- June 6: 1,504 (1 active; 1,481 recovered; 22
deaths) and 301 cases per million; 4 deaths per
million
Guam: 176 cases (5 deaths)
- June 6: 171 cases (1 death)
French Polynesia: 60 (all recovered) and
214 cases per million
- June 6: 60 (all recovered) and 214 cases per
million
New Caledonia: 21 (1 active; 20 recovered)
and 74
- June 6: 20 (2 active; 18 recovered) 70 cases
per million
(To access articles
individually click on the black headline.)
PDF
PREVIOUS ISSUES
| HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|