October 27, 2018 - No. 37
Supplement
73rd Session of UN
General Assembly
Principles of
Sovereignty and
Peaceful
Resolution of Disputes
Still the Order of the Day
UN General Assembly, September 18, 2018.
• Speech by
Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez
• Speech by Venezuelan President
Nicolás Maduro
73rd Session of UN General Assembly
Principles of Sovereignty and Peaceful Resolution
of Disputes
Still the Order of the Day
President
of the General Assembly María Fernanda Espinosa
Garcés.
|
The 73rd session of the UN General Assembly opened
September 18. It is presided over by María Fernanda Espinosa
Garcés of Ecuador. Prior to taking up her post as the President
of the General Assembly, she was Ecuador's Minister of Foreign
Affairs. In July, Espinosa Garcés announced the theme of the
general debate -- "Making the United Nations Relevant to All
People: Global Leadership and Shared Responsibilities for
Peaceful, Equitable and Sustainable Societies." She outlined
seven priority themes for this session: to promote gender
equality; to promote and implement new global compacts on migration
and refugees; to highlight innovative thinking around the future of
work; to promote efforts to protect the environment, particularly the
problem of plastics
pollution; raise awareness of persons with disabilities;
implement the reform of the UN system; and promote peace.
A notable event took place September 25, when the
General
Assembly held a high-level plenary meeting on global peace in
honour of the centenary of the birth of Nelson Mandela, called
the Nelson Mandela Peace Summit. The plenary adopted a political
declaration negotiated by member states. The Permanent
Representatives of South Africa and Ireland, serving as
co-facilitators, began consulting with governments on the
content of the declaration in May.
The high-level General Debate, where each member state
addresses the General Assembly, ran from September 25 to October
1. For the second year, the U.S. address was given by President
Donald Trump. In typical fashion, he justified U.S.
exceptionalism and hegemony (including within the UN and its
bodies), and also military and economic aggression, on the most
self-serving basis. "We are standing up for America and the
American people, and we are also standing up for the world," he
said. He claimed that the United States will always choose
independence and cooperation over global governance, control and
domination, meaning that it refuses to be held to account by the
UN, its Human Rights Council or the International Criminal
Court, having withdrawn from the latter two organizations this year. In
the
meantime it carries on as the world's gendarme. Trump in particular
singled out Venezuela and Iran as being a threat to other
countries, while upholding reactionary governments, such as
Poland, Israel and Saudi Arabia, as models of democracy and
progressive reforms.
For its part, Canada's representative highlighted the
UN's
Agenda 2030, the program calling on countries to meet the UN's 17
Sustainable Development Goals in the next 12 years. It was also
an opportunity for the Trudeau government to continue its bogus
rhetoric about "diversity." The first example given of
"diversity" stated that "Indigenous peoples in Canada are the
bedrock of our diversity. They speak more than 60 different
languages. Their cultures are some of the richest on the
continent." This is an affront to Indigenous peoples because it
denies the Canadian state's obligations to engage with them on
a nation-to-nation basis. It reduces them to a mere
ethnicity, without rights based on
their being, and covers up the ongoing negation of their
languages and cultures.
Another feature of Canada's intervention
was its subservience to U.S. imperialist aims, by promoting
foreign intervention and regime change in Syria, slandering
Venezuela and repeating the disinformation that Crimea's decision
to join Russia constitutes the "ongoing illegal annexation and
occupation of Crimea" and "is a clear breach of international
law," and that "Russia's destabilizing actions cannot be allowed
to stand." Another aspect of this subservience was expressed in
the conclusion of Canada's address to the General Assembly, which
focused on its campaign to win a seat on the Security Council,
where it will no doubt also serve U.S. interests. Canada's
representative at the UN presented the country's credentials for this
post
claiming that it has "championed the Women, Peace and Security
Agenda and Human Security," and that it has "fought for the
protection of civilians caught in the crossfire of armed
conflict," even though Canada's participation in U.S./NATO-led
aggression around the world is well known and has instigated
armed conflict and killed countless civilians.
In this supplement, TML Weekly is publishing
the
speeches
made to the UN General Assembly by Cuban President Miguel
Díaz-Canel and Venezuelan President
Nicolás Maduro. These speeches highlight some of the pressing
issues facing the UN and its functioning and international
relations as a whole, and underscore that principles of
sovereignty and peaceful resolution of disputes are still the
order of the day, and are what the peoples of the world are
striving for, despite the obstacles being put in their way by the
imperialists and their allies.
Speech by Cuban President
Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez
Madam President:
Mister Secretary-General:
It is impossible to be
here, speak from this rostrum on
behalf of Cuba, and not recall historic moments at the General
Assembly which are also part of our dearest memories: Fidel
Castro, Che Guevara, Raúl Castro and the "Chancellor of
Dignity"
Raúl Roa, just to mention the most significant, who have brought
here
not only the voice of our people but also the voice of other
Latin American and Caribbean, African, Asian, non-aligned
peoples, with whom we have shared more than half a century of
struggles for a fair international order, which is still far from
being attained.
It is absurd but consistent with the irrationality of a
world
in which the richest 0.7 per cent of the population owns 46 per
cent of all the wealth, while the poorer 70 per cent of the
population can access only 2.7 per cent of it; 3.460 billion
people survive in poverty; 815 million go hungry; 758 million are
illiterate and 844 million lack basic services of drinking water.
All these figures, by the way, are prepared and regularly used by
global organizations, but it seems that they have failed to raise
sufficient awareness of the so-called international
community.
These realities, Madam President, are not the result of
socialism, like the President of the United States said yesterday
here. They are the consequence of capitalism, especially
imperialism and neo-liberalism; of the selfishness and exclusion
that is inherent to that system, and of an economic, political,
social and cultural paradigm that privileges wealth accumulation
in the hands of a few at the cost of the exploitation and dire
poverty of the large majorities.
Capitalism consolidated colonialism. It gave birth to
fascism, terrorism and apartheid and spread wars and conflicts;
the breaches of sovereignty and self-determination of the
peoples; repression of workers, minorities, refugees and
migrants. Capitalism is the opposite of solidarity and democratic
participation. The production and consumption patterns that
characterize it, promote plundering, militarism, threats to
peace; they generate violations of human rights and are the
greatest danger to the ecological balance of the planet and the
survival of the human being.
No one should be deceived by anybody claiming that
humanity
lacks enough material, financial and technological resources to
eradicate poverty, hunger, preventable diseases and other
scourges. What is lacking is the political will of the
industrialized countries, who have the moral duty, the historical
responsibility and the abundant resources to solve the most
pressing global problems.
The truth is that while it is claimed that there is a
shortfall in funding to attain the goals and targets of the 2030
Agenda or address the increasing impact of climate change, $1.74
trillion were wasted in military expenditure in the year 2017,
the highest figure since the end of the Cold War.
Climate change is another unavoidable reality and a
matter of
survival for the human species, particularly for Small Island
Developing States. Some of its effects are already
irreversible.
Scientific evidence indicates there is an increase of
1.1° C
relative to pre-industrial levels, and that nine out of 10
persons living in urban areas breathe polluted air.
However, the United States, one of the major polluters
of
yesteryear and today, refuses to accompany the international
community in the implementation of the Paris Agreement on climate
change. It thus endangers the lives of future generations and the
survival of all species, including humans.
In addition, and as if there were not enough threats to
humanity and its dazzling creations, it is a fact that the
military and nuclear hegemonism of imperialism is perpetuating
itself and expanding to the detriment of the hopes of the
majority of peoples for a general and complete disarmament. Cuba
shares this ideal and, as testament of its commitment to this
goal, on January 31, it became the fifth state to ratify the
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.
In this organization that was born out of the human
desire to
overcome the destruction left by a terrible war through dialogue
between nations, it is not possible to keep quiet about the
danger looming over all of us, with the exacerbation of local
conflicts, wars of aggression disguised as "humanitarian
interventions," the forceful overthrow of sovereign governments,
the so-called "soft coups" and interference in other states'
internal affairs -- recurrent forms of action by some powers, using
the most diverse excuses.
International cooperation for the promotion and
protection of all human rights for all is a must. However, its
discriminatory and selective manipulation with claims of
domination, violates the rights to peace, self-determination and
development of the peoples.
Cuba rejects the militarization of outer space and
cyberspace, as well as the covert and illegal use of information and
communication technologies to attack other
states.
The exercise of multilateralism and full respect for
the
principles and rules of international law to advance towards a
multipolar, democratic and equitable world, are required in order
to ensure peaceful coexistence, preserve international peace and
security and find lasting solutions for systemic problems.
Against that logic, the threat or use of force,
unilateralism, pressures, retaliations and sanctions which
increasingly characterize the behavior and rhetoric of the U.S.
government and its abusive use of the veto power in the Security
Council in order to impose their political agenda, pose huge
challenges and threats within the United Nations itself.
Why don't we just implement the promised strengthening
of the
General Assembly as the main organ of deliberation, decision and
representation? The reform of the Security Council must not be
delayed or prevented, as this organ is in need of adjusting to
the times by democratizing its membership and working
methods.
Today we have come to reiterate what Commander-in-Chief
Fidel
Castro Ruz said on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the
UN, which summarizes the most noble aspiration of the majority of
humanity, and I quote: "We want a world without hegemonistic
practices, without nuclear weapons, without interventionism,
without racism, without national or religious hatred, without
violations of the sovereignty of any country, with respect for
independence and the free self-determination of peoples, without
universal models that do not take into account the traditions and
cultures of all components of humanity at all. Without cruel
blockades that kill men, women, children, the young, and the
elderly like silent atomic bombs."
More than 20 years have elapsed since that demand was
made
and none of those ills have been cured; in fact, they have been
exacerbated. We have every right to ask why. And we have the duty
to insist on effective and equitable solutions.
Madam President:
Our America is currently undergoing a stage of
persistent
threats, inconsistent with the "Proclamation of Latin America and
the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace," signed in Havana by the Heads
of States and Government on the occasion of the 2nd Summit of the
Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, in 2014.
The current U.S. administration has proclaimed the
relevance
of the Monroe Doctrine and, in a new deployment of its imperial
policy in the region, is attacking Venezuela with special
cruelty.
It is in this threatening context that we wish to
reiterate
our absolute support to the Bolivarian and Chavista Revolution,
the civic-military union of the Venezuelan people and its
legitimate and democratic government, led by the constitutional
President Nicolás Maduro Moros. We reject the intervention
attempts and sanctions against Venezuela, aimed at suffocating
her economically and hurting Venezuelan families.
We likewise reject the attempts at destabilizing the
Nicaraguan government, a country of peace that has made
remarkable social, economic and public safety progress in favour
of its people.
We denounce the politically-motivated imprisonment of
former
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and the decision to prevent
the people from voting and electing Brazil's most popular leader
to the presidency.
We stand in solidarity with the Caribbean nations who
demand
legitimate reparation for the horrible effects of slavery as well
as the fair, special and differential treatment that they
deserve.
We reaffirm our historic commitment to the
self-determination and independence of our fraternal people of
Puerto Rico.
We support Argentina's legitimate sovereignty claim
over the
Malvinas Islands, South Sandwich and South Georgia Islands.
We reiterate our unrestricted support to a
comprehensive,
just and lasting solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,
on the basis of the creation of two states, allowing the
Palestinian people to exercise their right to self-determination
and to have an independent and sovereign state based upon the
pre-1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital. We reject
the unilateral action of the United States to establish their
diplomatic representation in the city of Jerusalem, which
heightens even more the tensions in the region. We condemn the
barbarities of the Israeli forces against the civilian population
in Gaza.
We reaffirm our steadfast solidarity with the Saharan
people,
and support the search for a final solution to the question of
Western Sahara, which will allow the exercise of
self-determination and to live in peace in their territory.
We support the search for a peaceful and negotiated
solution
to the situation imposed in Syria, without foreign interference
and with full respect for its sovereignty and territorial
integrity. We reject any direct or indirect intervention, carried
out without the legitimate authorities of the country.
The continued expansion of NATO towards Russian borders
is
causing serious threats, worsened by the imposition of arbitrary
sanctions, which we reject.
We demand compliance with the Islamic Republic of
Iran's
nuclear deal.
We welcome the process of rapprochement and dialogue
among
the Koreas. This is the way to achieve a lasting peace,
reconciliation and stability on the Korean Peninsula. At the same
time, we strongly condemn the imposition of unilateral and unfair
sanctions against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and
foreign interference in Korean internal affairs.
The violations of the rules of international trade and
the
sanctions against China, the European Union and other countries
will bring about harmful effects, particularly for developing
States.
We favour dialogue and cooperation, thanks to which we
can
report today that the Cuba-EU Agreement on Political Dialogue and
Cooperation has provisionally entered into force and is a good
foundation to develop beneficial ties between the parties.
Madam President:
The government of the U.S. maintains an aggressive
rhetoric
towards Cuba and a policy aimed at subverting the political,
economic, social, and cultural system in my country. Contrary to
the interests of both peoples and giving in to the pressures of
minority sectors, the new U.S. government has devoted itself to
fabricating under false pretexts, scenarios of tension
and hostility that serve nobody's interests.
This in contrast to the fact that we have formal
diplomatic
relations and mutually beneficial cooperation programs in a
limited number of areas.
Our peoples share increasingly closer historic and
cultural
bonds, which are expressed in the arts, sports, science, and the
environment, among others. The potential for a fluent business
relationship is well known and a genuine and respectful
understanding would be in the interest of the entire region.
However, the essential and defining element of the
bilateral
relationship continues to be the blockade, which seeks to
suffocate the Cuban economy in order to generate hardships and
disrupt the constitutional order. It is a cruel policy, punishing
Cuban families and the entire nation.
It is the most comprehensive and long-standing system
of
economic sanctions ever implemented against any country. It has
been and continues to be a major obstacle to the country's
development and to the realization of the aspirations to progress
and well-being of several generations of Cubans.
As has been said for so many years in this same place,
due to
its aggressive extraterritorial implementation, the blockade
seriously damages the sovereignty and interests of all
countries.
On behalf of the Cuban people, I would like to thank
this
General Assembly for the virtually unanimous rejection of the
economic, commercial and financial blockade imposed by the United
States against my country.
Nevertheless, the actions of the U.S. government
against my
country go farther. They include public and covert programs of
gross interference in Cuba's internal affairs. To this end, tens
of millions of dollars that are officially allocated in its
budget are used, in violation of the standards and principles
upon which this organization rests, and in particular, of Cuba's
sovereignty as an independent nation.
Cuba stands ready to develop respectful and civilized
relations with the U.S. government on the basis of sovereign
equality and mutual respect. This is the will of the Cuban people
and we know this is a shared aspiration by most U.S. citizens
and, particularly, by Cubans living there.
We shall continue to tirelessly demand the end of the
cruel
economic, commercial and financial blockade, the return of the
territory illegally occupied by the Guantánamo Naval Base and
adequate compensation to our people for the thousands of dead and
disabled and for the economic and property damages caused to Cuba
over so many years of aggression.
Cuba will always be willing to engage in dialogue and
cooperate on the basis of respect and on an equal footing. We shall
never make concessions affecting our sovereignty and national
independence, we shall not negotiate our principles nor shall we
accept conditions.
In spite of the blockade, the hostility and the actions
carried out by the United States to impose a regime change in
Cuba, the Cuban Revolution is right here, alive and strong,
faithful to her principles!
Madam President:
The generational change in our government should not
raise
the hopes of the enemies of the Revolution. We are the
continuity, not a rupture. Cuba has continued taking steps to
improve its model of economic and social development in order to
build a sovereign, independent, socialist, democratic, prosperous
and sustainable nation. This is the path that our people have
freely chosen.
The country will not go back to the opprobrious past
that it
shook off with the greatest sacrifices during 150 years of
struggle for independence and full dignity. By the decision of
the overwhelming majority of Cubans, we shall continue the work
that started almost 60 years ago.
In this conviction, we began a constitutional reform
process,
a truly participatory and democratic exercise, through popular
discussion of the draft which will eventually be approved in a
referendum. I am certain that there will be no changes in our
strategic objectives and that the irrevocable nature of socialism
will be ratified.
The principles of foreign policy will remain unchanged.
As
the First Secretary of our Party, Raúl Castro Ruz, said in his
statement on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the United
Nations, and I quote: "The international community will always be
able to count on Cuba's sincere voice against injustice,
inequality, underdevelopment, discrimination and manipulation;
and for the establishment of a fairer and more equitable
international order, truly focused on human beings, their dignity
and well-being."
The Cuba on behalf of which I speak today is the proud
successor of that independent, sovereign, fraternal and
solidarity policy with the poorest of this world, producers of
all the wealth on the planet, although the unequal global order
has sentenced them with dire poverty in the name of words like
democracy, freedom and human rights, words which the rich have
actually emptied of meaning.
It has been exciting and pleasant to take the floor at
the
same rostrum from which 58 years ago Fidel expressed powerful truths
that still continue to shake us, in front of representatives
of more than 190 nations who, rejecting extortion and pressures,
every year fill the voting screen with green lights of
approval for our demand for the end of the blockade.
I bid you farewell in the hope that the noble
aspirations of
most of Humanity will be achieved before younger generations take
this rostrum to demand the same as we do today, and our historic
predecessors did yesteryear.
Thank you very much.
Speech by Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro
Ambassadors, heads of
delegations of the countries
members
of the United Nations Organization, President-elect of the
General Assembly, María Fernanda Espinoza, may I extend to
you congratulations on behalf of the delegation of the
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela -- our government -- on assuming
the presidency of the 73rd session of the General Assembly as the
first Latin-American woman to be president of a General Assembly
session. On this occasion, we have been invited to work and
address an important and vital issue, entitled as follows:
"Making the United Nations Relevant to All People: Global
Leadership and Shared Responsibilities for Peaceful, Equitable
and Sustainable Societies." So we are here to make the United
Nations relevant for all people.
This is precisely the noble purpose [that] the United
Nations
system has to build in light of the 21st century: a century of
great opportunities and certainly a century that will make the
difference regarding the human liberation processes -- political
liberation, peoples' liberation -- that, sooner or later, will
impact significantly on the future of the United Nations
Organization.
The current United Nations Organization was born at the
end
of the Second World War (1945). During the 20th century, its
configuration expressed the conflicts and forms of actions of the
bipolar world of the postwar years and, after the fall of the
Soviet Union in the '90s, we moved to a unipolar world.
The correlation of forces in the world, regarding the
world
system, has always influenced the United Nations Organization
directly. However, in order to be relevant -- according to the
purpose of this 73rd General Assembly -- this organization has to
express the wishes, the way of being, the culture, the political
thinking, the strength and the hopes of the majorities in the
world.
That is why Venezuela is here today; to say its truth;
I
bring the truth of a combative, heroic and revolutionary world; I
bring the voice of a homeland that, throughout history, has
refused to surrender to injustice, to the empires of the past --
slaver and colonialist -- and the empires of today -- equally
slaver and neo-colonialist. I bring the voice of a heroic people
that arose from the heroic resistance of the aborigines, from the
Indigenous peoples that for centuries resisted the domination by
colonial empires. I bring the voice of the people having the
honour of being the great Liberator Símon Bolívar's home,
the most
important leader of a generation of liberators of the Americas,
who accomplished, 200 years ago, the heroic feat of founding a
continent, a region, a dream: the independent republics of this
world region.
Venezuela is a historic people which is both a home and
a
school of republican values; a home and a school of
rebelliousness; a home and a school of dignity and values such as
equality; such is our obstinate homeland that for centuries has
searched for its independence and sovereignty.
I speak on their behalf amid this scenario which has
witnessed the most evil and embarrassing attacks in the last
years; for our country is a harassed and attacked country.
Yesterday, in this same place, the President of the United States
of America once again attacked the noble people of Venezuela and
supported, as he said, the doctrine founded by the empire of the
United States 200 years ago, which determined their
interventionist role, their intended role of judge, party and
police of the world: the Monroe Doctrine. Yes, the president of
the most powerful imperial nation, the United States of America,
was in this same place, supporting James Monroe's doctrine, who,
at that time, said "America for Americans," meaning that the rest
of America had to belong to them as the backyard for the
interests of Washington elite groups that already conducted the
configuration of that nation as a former colony of the British
empire.
He supported the Monroe Doctrine. And you may be
wondering
about the reason for such fierce attack by the [U.S.] power,
expressed at all levels by President Donald Trump. It is a
historic conflict as we have said to the world many times, as our
people well know. It is the conflict between the interventionist
imperial, neo-colonialist Monroe Doctrine against the historic,
independent, republican, doctrine of Simón Bolívar, of
rebelliousness, dignity, justice, liberty and equality. It is an
old conflict; an old contradiction due to an imperial doctrine
aimed at dominating our region. During the 19th century, it was
aimed at dominating our region only; however, in the 20th
century, it was intended to dominate the world and in the 21st
century it tries to continue governing, conducting, blackmailing
and arranging the world as if it were [U.S.] property. In our
region, it is a 200-year contradiction between the republican
libertarian flags which, in the 19th century -- the time of
Simón Bolívar and the liberators -- advocated for a world
of
equilibrium and respect and the pro-imperialist and
interventionist flags that promoted the domination of the region
by an elite group that already had the control of the power in
Washington.
It is an old conflict we know very well. Today,
Venezuela is
a victim of a permanent aggression in the economic, political,
diplomatic and media fields by those who govern the United States
of America and support the Monroe Doctrine to justify the
ideological, political and diplomatic aggression against our
beloved homeland.
Our reason for being here is that reason. Why is
Venezuela
being politically, economically and diplomatically attacked?
First of all, Venezuela has built an autonomous project of
democratic revolution, social vindication, and construction of itself
and a new model of society, which is based on the historical
roots of our nation, on the identity of our country and on the
culture of our own Latin-American region.
For 20 years, they have intended to stop the
course of
our history, the development of a revolutionary project that
arose from the struggle of our people and region.
Secondly -- and perhaps more understandable -- for global
geopolitical reasons, Venezuela is the nation with the largest
oil reserve in the world, internationally certified. Venezuela, as
founder of OPEC, Venezuela, a country with 100 years of oil
production, discovered and certified internationally, the largest
oil [deposits in] the world. Venezuela has also significant
natural and mining richness. Today, according to international
standards, our country is certifying the potentially biggest gold
reserve in the world.
The world must know that currently, apart from being
the
biggest international oil reserve, Venezuela is certifying, under
international standards, the biggest gold reserve in the world
and the fourth largest gas reserve in the world as well. The
significant
natural resources, and important geopolitical, geo-economic and
geo-strategic position has lead the oligarchies of the continent
and those who dominate from Washington, to consider dominating
and controlling the political power in Venezuela. At present,
Venezuela is victim of a permanent aggression.
In the economic sphere, during the last two years,
Venezuela
has been subjected to a set of illegal unilateral measures of
economic persecution and blockade; we have been restrained from
using the international currency -- the U.S. dollar -- ... by the
authorities of the U.S.
Department of Treasury. Currently, Venezuela cannot negotiate any
international transaction in U.S. dollars. Does the world know that
Venezuela is persecuted from an economic, commercial and monetary
point of view? Today, Venezuela is target of a set of illegal and
unilateral mechanisms of economic sanctions.
Yesterday, the President of the United States
announced,
precisely on this same platform, new and [illegal] economic and
financial sanctions against our country under the sanctuary of the
law and international legality. Does the United Nations system
know that the unilateral sanctions, using the dominion, the
status of the currency and financial persecution are
considered illegal from the standpoint of international law?
Venezuela is subjected to a permanent media aggression as well;
attempts ... have been made to justify an
international intervention [...] through the media against our
country to pretend a humanitarian crisis [exists], that uses the
United Nations' concepts to justify a coalition of countries, led
by the Government of the United States and their satellite
governments in Latin America, to get its hands on our country. A
migration crisis, that goes without saying, has been forged by
several means, aimed at diverting attention from the real
migration crises in the world that show the disadvantages of the
southern countries. The migratory crisis in Central America,
Mexico, and Latin America has arisen due to the announcement of a
retaining wall against our peoples, a dividing wall against them.
Nobody wants to talk about this situation. A double-standard of
treatment [is in place] over the real status of the Caribbean and
Latin American migrants who have been persecuted along the border
with Mexico; they have been separated from their families, their
kids have been kidnapped; and no response is given about this
issue or about the serious migration crisis caused by the
destruction in Libya by NATO and the war against Syria, resulting
in the migration of thousands of African and Middle-East
brothers. It is an issue that is intentionally masked.
A global media campaign about an alleged migratory
crisis in
Venezuela has been deployed to justify a humanitarian
intervention, as announced for years. It is a plan similar to the
weapons-of-mass-destruction plan used in Iraq; it is the same
plan that justified the intervention in other countries, this
time in the form of a great brutal psychological warfare
campaign. Today, Venezuela is also the victim of diplomatic
aggression. Yesterday -- dear brothers and sisters of the
governments of the world -- we witnessed direct threats to cut
aid, to withdraw aid or blockade aid from the international
support and aid systems for the governments and peoples of the
world [...] by the President of the United States.
We have listened to the statements issued by several
governments demanding better mechanisms to access financing, to
access development to which our peoples are entitled. Yesterday,
the President of the United States, from this very platform,
threatened the governments of the world to submit to its designs,
to its orders and to cooperate with its policies in the United
Nations system, or he would act accordingly. Venezuela has been
attacked with a fierce diplomatic offensive at all of the United
Nations system bodies, supported by [subservient] governments
blackening the honour of the peoples that they are called to
represent.
Venezuela has been subjected to permanent political
aggression. On September 8, the New York Times published
an article revealing the participation of White
House officials and the government of the United States, in meetings to
bring about a military coup and cause a change of government, a
change of regime in Venezuela. The investigation published by the New
York
Times -- replicated by Time Magazine,
the Washington Post and the world press -- simply
confirmed the conspiracy, the permanent aggression by factors of
the government of the United States against a constitutional and
strengthened democracy; a democracy supported by the people, such
as the Venezuelan democracy. We had already denounced in due
course, the attempted violence against the Constitution, the
attempted disturbances and military coups against the
constitutional and revolutionary government over which I preside
in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, by popular will and
popular vote.
After announcing and publishing the failed attempts at
disturbances and military violence -- the New York Times
published details on how U.S. officials in Colombia, supported by
the Colombian government and Colombian institutions, met and
offered their encouragement and support for this attempted change
of regime. Should the United Nations system [...] should Latin
America and the Caribbean accept these methods that so hurt our
region during the entire 20th century? How many military
interventions? How many coups d'état? How many dictatorships
were
imposed during the long and dark 20th century in Latin America
and the Caribbean, and who did they favour? Did they favour the
peoples? What interests did they represent? The interests of the
transnational companies, the unpopular interests; long
dictatorships, like Augusto Pinochet's in Chile, were faced by
our peoples due to the stubbornness of the [U.S.] elites and the
Monroe Doctrine to deny the right earned by ourselves to govern
our countries the way we need, and build the specific economic,
political and cultural systems of the region.
That is why I come here, to bring the truth of a
fighting
people, Venezuela has been targeted by a seemingly never-ending
political and media campaign. That is why we bring our homeland's
truth to this honorable UN General Assembly. After the failure
published and announced by the New York Times of these
illegal, unconstitutional and criminal attempts of regime change;
after the democratic presidential election, last May 20, when I,
Nicolás Maduro Moros, obtained 68 per cent of the popular votes
through free elections -- the 24th election in 19 years, of which
22 have been won by the revolutionary forces of the Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela, at different levels of approval, against
the opposition forces of our country; after the failure of the
attempted military coups, candidacies and electoral tactics
supported by Washington, with the huge electoral victory attained
by the people, last August 4, I was a victim of a terrorist
attack with drones that tried to kill me at a military event on
one of the main avenues in Caracas. If it had been executed as
planned, it would have been a massacre, an assassination of the
institutional, political and military high command of our nation,
Venezuela.
On August 4, the perpetrators, the terrorists, those
who
attacked me with drones -- this is the first attack with drones
known in the world history of terrorist violence -- were captured
by the security bodies and State police agencies. The 28
perpetrators were captured thanks to different investigation
procedures. They are convicted and sentenced. As I informed the
different governments of the world, all the investigations about
that terrorist attack indicate that it was prepared, financed and
planned in the territory of the United States of America. I have
informed the Government of the United States -- by diplomatic
means -- the name, the responsibility and the evidence against the
intellectual perpetrators, financers and planners of this serious
terrorist attack. According to investigations, this attempt and
the actual perpetrators -- as they have admitted -- were trained
and prepared for months in Colombian territory under the
protection and support of Colombian authorities; and according to
the latest investigations and arrests -- as unveiled to the
media -- the perpetrators mentioned some of the diplomatic
members of the governments of Chile, Colombia and Mexico who
would help them to escape after the terrorist attack.
I would like to ask the United Nations system to
appoint a
special delegate of the Secretariat of the United Nations to
conduct an independent investigation internationally about the
implications and responsibilities for this terrorist attack
perpetrated in our country. Venezuela is open; the doors of our
country and our judicial system are opened in order to determine
the direct responsibilities of this aggression, the most serious
in the political history of our country for its implications.
They tried to provoke chaos in our homeland, they tried to
[decapitate the state] to justify [internal strife] and the
activation of mechanisms beyond the United Nations multilateral
system, of a military intervention as occurred in other countries
in the past.
Officially, Venezuela proposes [...] to conduct an
independent international investigation to determine the truth
about these events. I have expressed to the Government of the United
States -- which has denied its participation in the preparation
and execution of these attempts -- that it would be great if it
heeded my call to include high-level FBI professionals and
scientists in this investigation to clarify and help the
Venezuelan justice system to find the truth.
When I arrived in New York this afternoon, I heard
that
some journalists had asked President Donald Trump if he was
willing to meet with [the] President of Venezuela. Apparently,
President Donald Trump in one of his interventions today said
that if it helps Venezuela, he was willing to do so. Well, I
ratify on this platform, that despite the great historical,
ideological and social differences -- since I am a worker, a bus
driver, a man of the people, I am not a rich man, I am not a
millionaire -- despite all the differences deemed as enormous,
the President of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro Moros, is willing to
shake hands with the U.S. President. I am willing to sit and talk
about the bilateral differences and the matters of our
region.
[...] Venezuela is a friendly country. Venezuelans do
not
hate the United States; on the contrary, we appreciate the United
States, their culture, their arts, their society. We differ from
the imperial concepts that have taken over the political power in
Washington since the foundation of that nation.
In 1826, our Liberator Simón Bolívar said
prophetically: "The
United States appear to be destined by providence to plague
America with hunger and misery in the name of liberty."
It was a prophetic vision. It was hard to see at early
times
the future in the 20th century. Do we have differences with
President Donald Trump? Of course we do. But differences lead to
dialogue. Those who are different are called to put their good
will and words on the table. President Donald Trump said he is
worried about Venezuela, that he wants to help Venezuela.
Well, I am willing to talk, with an open agenda about
the
topics that the United States government wants to discuss, with
humility, frankness and honesty. As President of the Non-Aligned
Movement, Venezuela raises the flags of dialogue among
civilizations. As President of the Non-Aligned Movement,
Venezuela permanently promotes and practices political and
international dialogue, the solution of international conflicts
through dialogue, understanding and the pacific use of politics
and not by force.
Venezuela is significantly experienced in bodies such
as
OPEC, to manage situations of divergence and build consensus and
agreements. Recently, in Algeria, we attended the meeting of the
OPEC monitoring committee. It was an extraordinary meeting with
the representatives of the monitoring committee, since we are
part of it, and the representatives of 24 States with the
greatest oil reserves and producers of the world. And despite the
cultural, political, geostrategic and geopolitical differences,
we reached an agreement, a single voice to continue stabilizing
the oil market at fair, reasonable and stable prices.
We believe in political dialogue as a way to find
solutions and solve conflicts. [The U.S. has] tried to demonize
the Bolivarian Revolution through an unprecedented brutal
campaign. First, against Commander Hugo Chávez Frías,
founder of
our Revolution and eternal commander in the heart of Venezuelans,
and then against this humble man who is standing here, bringing
the voice of a people that supports its Revolution and
democratically supports its actions.
Therefore, I reaffirm the desire for international and
national political dialogue. I know that governments represented
in this room are interested in reaching peace with sovereignty,
independence and justice in Venezuela. I welcome all those from
Africa, Europe, Asia, Latin America who wish to help, respecting
the country's sovereignty, without interfering in Venezuela's
internal affairs, so that they can support us, join us in a
process of sovereign dialogue for peace, democracy, justice,
the future and prosperity in Venezuela; a noble nation which deserves
peace, a future and the best.
We bring good news from a country that has not given up
and
shall not do so. Good news from a nation that is consolidating
its democracy; good news from a country that is building its own
social model, its own welfare state by means of new formulas to
protect its elders, its pensioners, its children, its young
people, its women, the neediest sectors, its working class. We
also bring good news regarding the efforts for an economic
recovery; in fact, I activated, in August, an Economic Recovery,
Growth and Prosperity Program which is succeeding in placing the
bases of a new economy, not dependent on oil revenues, a
diversified economy, of sustainable growth and prosperity
building, heading towards a new kind of social model.
We believe in a different world; our generation
witnessed the
so-called bipolar world, the so-called Cold War which some
apparently want to bring back again through attacks against
China, Russia and modest countries like Venezuela. However,
provoking a fight against countries like Russia and China is a
contradiction of what a humanitarian international policy should
be, meaning one which recognizes the emergence of new poles of
power and the need to build a multipolar world.
Venezuela is a country which advocates for and is
committed
to the construction of a pluripolar and multicentric world, where
all the different regions (Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean,
Asia, Europe, and North America) can live together in balance and
peace, respecting our cultures, religions, idiosyncrasies,
identities and economic and political models. There is not a
unique economic model; we must not allow the imposition of a
single cultural model, a single political model; they intend to
impose a single thought for humanity. I say no. We vindicate the
cultural, religious and political diversity of humanity of this
world. Therefore, in the Non-aligned Movement, we advocate for
the emergence of such a world of justice.
We assume and declare our solidarity with the Arab
people of
Palestine; justice shall arrive in Palestine so that their
historic territories, established in 1967 by this United Nations
Organization, are respected.
We carry with us the flag of the Palestinian people. We
support the UN call for an end to the infamous and criminal
50-year-blockade against the Cuban people. We have had enough of
anachronistic methods that [the U.S. intends] to continue
imposing against the Cuban people, and now against other peoples
like Venezuela.
So we raise our two hands to vote on the United Nations
Resolution, which in the next few days will be carried out to
reject the blockade and economic-financial persecution of
Cuba, and demand its immediate lifting, in a world to be built,
in a world to be made.
Two hundred years ago, our region was plagued by
colonies,
slavery and injustice. One hundred years ago, as peoples, we
struggled for freedom. Today, in the 21st century, the moment has
come, the opportunity has come. Undoubtedly, in the Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela, with Simón Bolívar's revolutionary
ideas,
with the example and legacy of Commander Hugo Chávez -- whose
voice still resonates here in this room demanding justice and
justice for the world, demanding the cessation of the imperial
practices of threats, coercion and extortion against peoples --
we can say that in 20 years of revolution, the last three have
been the hardest years: years of harassment, aggression and
attacks.
Today, on September 26, 2018, I can say that we have
faced
political, media, diplomatic, economic and financial
persecution, but I also can say that today Venezuela is stronger
than ever. We have learned how to resist and draw strength
from our historic roots to stand up, victorious and willing to
continue advancing in the construction of our own social model,
which is the Socialist Revolution of the 21st century; we say
it to the four winds, it is a new revolution, of independence,
dignity and justice.
Today, we are stronger than ever. Yes, I was a witness,
we
were witnesses two days ago of the tribute to Nelson Mandela;
speaking about Mandela is speaking about rebellion. Many people
have tried to create a wrong picture of Mandela [as being a
fool], somebody who did not fight. Mandela is a synonym for
rebellion against injustice, bravery, courage and the challenge
to the oppressors. We are followers of Nelson Mandela's legacy
and the great African leaders who have raised the struggle for
equality, justice and against slavery, racism and colonialism in
all its forms.
We saw the tribute to Nelson Mandela and we thought how
much
this world has changed. Just 30 years ago Mandela was considered
a terrorist by the United States Congress and the North American
governments. Just a few years ago Nelson Mandela was still on the
list of sanctioned people. It may sound familiar to you: Nelson
Mandela, the terrorist, the sanctioned, the persecuted, and the
abandoned. The world has changed a lot since then. Currently,
Nelson Mandela is a flag that we embrace with love, with
conviction. He is a symbol of what it is possible to do if the
rebellion, the struggle, and justice are able to conquer the
noble hearts and minds of the peoples.
I trust in the future of humanity, in the destiny of my
country, in the common future of this community represented here
in the United Nations Organization, and I must say, after having
resisted coup d'état attempts and terrorist attacks, that I
trust
the human being, the future of humanity. Venezuela says to the
United Nations: We trust in the noble ideals of the Venezuelan
people, that do not give up, and will not surrender. Thank you
very much, dear compatriots of the world. Count on Venezuela for
the great causes of the future of this organization, and the
future of a multipolar world! Good evening to all of you, thank
you.
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|