CPC(M-L) HOME ontario@cpcml.ca

October 5, 2011 - No. 8

40th Ontario General Election

Establishing Ownership Over Our Resources and Decision-Making -- A Central Election Issue

Ontario's Resources
Establishing Ownership Over Our Resources and Decision-Making -- A Central Election Issue

The Ring of Fire
Mining Development in the Service of U.S. Imperialist War Preparations - Dave Starbuck
Positions of the Liberals, Conservatives and NDP
An Issue of Sustainability - Patrick Whiteway, Canadian Mining Review

Letter to the Editor
Our Resources Stay Here!


Ontario's Resources

Establishing Ownership Over Our Resources and Decision-Making -- A Central Election Issue

In this issue Ontario Political Forum provides detailed information on mining development in the northern Ontario region known as the Ring of Fire, in the service of U.S. imperialist war preparations. The central issue this project raises is how to establish ownership rights and decision-making related to the mineral treasure trove that has been discovered in the Ring of Fire area and over northern development as a whole. The resources found in the geographical territory known as Ontario belong first of all to the First Nations and through them to the peoples of Ontario and Canada. This is not a matter of paying lip-service to the First Nations to justify a paternalistic "consultation process" and "job training" for First Nations youth. It is a matter of right and making arrangements which provide that right with a guarantee. So long as different northern development plans do not recognize the rights involved and the relations of one right to another and do not establish a process which enables the different interests to set the development program, then everyone falls victim to the competition between municipalities, provinces, governments and others. Everyone is set jumping to the tune set by the globe's biggest monopolies and superpower.

U.S.-based monopoly Cliffs Natural Resources has staked claims on the Ring of Fire and is in a big rush to begin chromite mining and smelting. Chromite is important in steel production and it is clear that this project furthers Canada's annexation to the U.S. by using its people and resources to supply the U.S. Empire's war preparations, all with the full support of the Ontario and Canadian governments.

The development of the Ring of Fire can be approached by First Nations, workers and local politicians in an entirely different way, as a key component of a Canadian nation-building project. First Nations' peoples and Canadians have to start by taking stock of how they are being played against one another so as to marginalize them and pay lip-service to their issues in the name of jobs, benefits, the youth, etc. They can set their own agenda and then pursue that agenda with single-minded and single-hearted determination. The First Nations who inhabit the area, the workers whose labour will extract the ore from the earth and process it into usable commodities, the mining communities in northern Ontario, the people of the entire province and country are One. It is possible to work out a program which does not pit one section against another section in a race to the bottom. It Can Be Done! It Must Be Done!

Ontario's Economy Needs a New Direction

Plans for the economy of northern Ontario as well as that of the whole province need a new direction. The current capital-centred mining development has enriched the owners of the foreign monopolies who have seized control of Ontario's mineral assets. Over the past two generations, the claim of labour on the mining resources of the North has declined. Tens of thousands of jobs have been eliminated in the northern Ontario mining and metallurgical industries in this time. Many small towns remind one more of the fifties than the twenty-first century.

More capital-centred mining development will not solve the crisis facing the Ontario economy. Neither will more government handouts to foreign mining monopolies. Electricity subsidies, road or rail infrastructure and tax incentives will hand billions of public monies to Cliffs Natural Resources over the life of the proposed mines. And, for all of the public monies, no more than 1,300 direct jobs will be created.

Capital-centred mining development severely challenges the natural and social environment in the areas where it is developed. The Ring of Fire is an area of permafrost and muskeg, five hundred kilometres from existing rail and road links, and inhabited only by widely separated First Nations. Mining development under such conditions poses exceptional challenges if the natural and social environments are not to be severely harmed. The future of the First Nations peoples who live in the James Bay Lowlands is of particular concern. These communities are amongst the most economically and socially deprived in the province. Rapid development, if it is brought about from outside and without empowering the First Nations peoples and workers in a manner which upholds the rights of all, could easily wreck what remains of the social and economic fabric of the First Nations peoples in the James Bay Lowlands.


Protest by Nishnabe Aski Nation at Queen's Park, September 16, 2010, against Bill 191, the Far North Act, which came into force in October 2010 and directly pertains to plans for chromite mining in the area known as the Ring of Fire.

Current northern development plans promoted by provincial governments and political parties within the parliaments and in opposition are all versions of capital-centred, not human-centred plans. None of them solve the problem of providing the ownership and decision-making power with a modern definition which establishes the real owners' control over the resources. Capital-centred development of the Ring of Fire has the aim of ensuring that the U.S. war machine has an ample supply of a strategic war material by placing the public resources of the province at the disposal of a foreign monopoly. Such activity disregards the interests of the First Nations, the workers and the mining communities, and must be rejected as a basis of mining development in the Ring of Fire or anywhere else.

Rejection of development which negates the peoples' interests is the first step to elaborate a human-centred alternative to capital-centred mining development. Human-centred mining development, as a fundamental principle, recognizes the right of First Nations to their hereditary rights if they are to benefit economically from industrial development in their traditional territories. This necessarily means ensuring First Nations can exercise their right to decision-making regarding these projects, including the right of veto. Human-centred mining development recognizes the right of labour (both Native and non-Native) to establish its claim as the key factor in the creation of wealth and does not denigrate labour as a cost of production. Human-centred mining development recognizes that workers and their families have the right to a modern Canadian standard of wages, benefits and working conditions for themselves and education, health care and other social services for their families. Human-centred mining development recognizes the right of the northern communities to decide their fate as well. To function in a modern way recognizes that economic development must also take place in harmony with the natural and social environment. The contradictory and competing interests can be sorted out on the basis of mutual benefit.

No to Mining Development in the Service of U.S. War Preparations!
No to Capital-Centred Mining Development! Let's Discuss!

Return to top


The Ring of Fire

Mining Development in the Service of
U.S. Imperialist War Preparations

In March 2006, geologists searching for diamond-bearing kimberlites in the McFauld's Lake area of the James Bay Lowlands of northern Ontario, 500 km northeast of Thunder Bay, found vast amounts of a black ore which was determined to be chromite. The deposit is one of the largest discoveries of chromite in the world and the only one in North America and is reported to contain enough chromite for 100 years worth of production at current demand levels. Other exploration quickly found nickel, copper, zinc, gold and platinum group metals. The discovery was quickly dubbed the Ring of Fire. It had been theorized that there was mineralized greenstone in that part of the province as surveys had been flown by the Canadian Geological Survey in 1957 but isolation and harsh conditions had precluded detailed exploration.

Early in 2010, a large U.S. company, Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased two large chromite deposits and the controlling interest in a third deposit in the Ring of Fire and announced "its intent to develop the mining operation in the Ring and a ferrochrome processing operation at a site to be determined in Ontario ... with projected start-up in 2015." Dating back to 1846, Cliffs is the largest producer of iron ore pellets in North America, a major supplier of iron ore out of Australia and a significant producer of metallurgical coal. Eighty-seven per cent owned by institutional investors and mutual funds with the largest shareholders being Capital World Investors (9.17 per cent), The Vanguard Group (5.31 per cent), Growth Fund of America Inc.(4.22 per cent) and State Street Corporation (4.08 per cent).

A project description of Cliffs' chromite project was released this February naming Sudbury as the front-runner to host the ore processing. The project details outline a 6,000- to 12,000-tonnes-per-day mine. An on-site ore chromite processing facility would handle between 3,600 and 7,200 tonnes per day at full production, producing a concentrate suitable for refining which would then be transported by truck down a proposed 300-kilometre permanent road to a railhead near the northwestern Ontario village of Nakina and loaded onto CN freight for direct delivery to Sudbury for refining. Their preferred location is a 5,000-acre former open-pit iron ore mine near Moose Mountain, north of Capreol in the City of Greater Sudbury. The refinery would produce from 400,000 to 800,000 t/yr of ferrochromium that would subsequently be used to produce alloy or stainless steel. As many as 1,300 direct jobs could be created with 300 to 500 jobs at the remote mine site, 200 to 300 in transportation, and 400 to 500 in the ferrochrome production facility. Metallurgical test work is being conducted by Xstrata Process Support (XPS) at their facilities in Sudbury. The tests will provide data on the friability of the ore and the amount of electrical energy consumed in its smelting.

However, Sudbury is not the only site being considered by Cliffs for their proposed ferrochrome smelter. Timmins, Thunder Bay and Greenstone have also put forward proposals. This has led to the unseemly sight of mayors and economic development officials competing amongst themselves to provide the most tax incentives and infrastructure to the project, a phenomenon that Cliffs readily encourages. Cliffs has not committed to building its smelter in Ontario, threatening to locate it in Manitoba or Quebec if Ontario does not provide a more favourable hydro rate.

According to the Manitoba Hydro website, a company like Cliffs Resources would pay a hydro bill of about $63 million a year if it located the smelter in Ontario. The same refinery located in Manitoba would pay $26 million a year or $33.5 million a year in Quebec. While Northern Ontario generates some of the cleanest and greenest electricity (mostly from hydroelectric sources constructed decades ago) at some of the lowest costs on the planet, the pricing of electricity is set province-wide in Toronto. Xstrata closed the Kidd Creek met site in Timmins last year citing high hydro rates, as did Vale its copper refinery in Sudbury four years earlier. Xstrata was paying hydro bills of $70 million per year at its Timmins smelter, and now is paying less than half that amount in Quebec.

Cliffs' President of Ferroalloys Bill Boor said, although the Capreol is the most "technically feasible" site for the ferrochrome processing, there is no place in Ontario that makes economic sense with the price of power at its current provincial rates. "The availability of a large, reliable and cost-competitive supply of electricity is a key consideration in locating the appropriate site of the ferrochrome production facility," said Boor. Cliffs said the electric arc furnaces used in ferrochrome production require 300 megawatts of power, slightly more than one per cent of Ontario's total electricity production.

Timmins Mayor Tom Laughren said Cliffs' message is clear, that Ontario won't get any of the processing or stainless steel manufacturing jobs until power rates come in line with other provinces. "We (northern Ontario municipalities) can all compete for the project individually but at the end of the day, if we do not get energy rates in line with what their (Cliffs) expectation is none of us is going to see it (the ferrochrome refinery)."

***

The development of the Ring of Fire in the James Bay Lowlands will extend the development frontier of Ontario from Timmins to the Attawapiskat River and result in billions of dollars of spending on new mines, processing facilities and infrastructure, according to senior executives of several junior mining companies. "This is going to be huge," said Frank Smeenk, President, KWG Resources in June 2009. "This greenstone belt, this Ring of Fire crescent, is about the same land area of the Abitibi Greenstone Belt, which includes Timmins, Kirkland Lake, Noranda and Val d'Or. It comprises a substantial part of the mining wealth of Canada, and we have a sister to it."

At present, the main supplier of ferrochrome for the North American steel industry is South Africa. While in South Africa, chromite is found in narrow seams of two to three metres thick that go for miles and miles and miles, the Fauld Lake deposit lies close to the surface and is 100 metres wide, 300 to 400 metres deep and extends over a mineralization zone of sixteen kilometres.

***

Chromite is the only ore of chromium, a metal used to induce hardness, toughness and chemical resistance in steel. Most chromite ore is converted into ferrochromium that is consumed by the metallurgical industry and most of that is consumed to make stainless and heat-resistant steel. Alloyed with iron and nickel, chromium produces an alloy known as nichrome which is resistant to high temperatures and used to make heating units, ovens and other appliances. Thin coatings of chromium alloys are used as platings on auto parts, appliances and other products. Superalloys use chromium and have strategic military applications. Applications of superalloys include: gas turbines (commercial and military aircraft, power generation, and marine propulsion); space vehicles; submarines; nuclear reactors; military electric motors; racing and high performance vehicles, chemical processing vessels, bomb casings and heat exchanger tubing. Chromium has no substitute in stainless steel, the leading end use, or in superalloys, the major strategic end use. Chromium-containing scrap can substitute for ferrochromium in some metallurgical uses.

United States' chromium consumption is equivalent to about 14 per cent of all the chromite ore mined each year. In the Western Hemisphere, chromite ore is produced in small amounts in Brazil and Cuba; the United States, Mexico and Canada do not produce chromite. South Africa, India, Kazakhstan and Turkey account for three-quarters of world chromite ore production. World resources of chromite are sufficient to meet conceivable demand for centuries. However, until the discovery of the Ring of Fire, about 95 per cent of the world's chromium resources were geographically concentrated in Kazakhstan and southern Africa.

***

It is the military applications of chromium that make it the target for such rapid development. Chromium is a strategic metal. The need for a safe and secure supply of chromite for the U.S. military machine was revealed recently by WikiLeaks. In secret diplomatic messages sent by U.S. diplomats stationed around the world, concern was expressed about foreign dependence on key commodities. Reponding to this, KWG Resources, one of the junior miners purchased by Cliffs, issued a statement. "The inclusion of chrome sources in Kazakhstan and India, on a U.S. State Department leaked listing of strategic assets, demonstrates the potential global significance of the Ring of Fire chromite discoveries. Until now, North America has had no commercially viable sources of chromite," said KWG president Frank Smeenk. "We have pressed both our Canadian and Ontario governments to heed the strategic significance of these remarkable discoveries, as they represent potential continental self-sufficiency and a Canadian export commodity that is crucial to Canada's allied trading partners. These leaked intelligence reports have dramatically underscored our message in this regard."

In July 2011, the Center for Strategic Leadership of the U.S. Army War College published an Issue Paper entitled "Strategic Minerals: Is China's Consumption a Threat to United States Security." Revealing their fascist and imperialist hearts, the authors begin the paper by providing a 1937 quote from Hjalmer Schacht, then German Minister of Economics: "No great nation willingly allows its standard of life and culture to be lowered and no great nation accepts the risk that it will go hungry."

In the paper the writers say: "The vitality of a powerful nation depends upon its ability to secure access to the strategic resources necessary to sustain its economy and produce effective weapons for defense. This is especially true for the world's two largest economies, those of the United States and China, which are similarly import dependent for around half of their petroleum needs and large quantities of their strategic minerals.

"Because China's economy and resource import dependence continue to grow at a high rate it has adopted a geopolitical strategy to secure strategic resources. China's resulting role in the mineral trade has increased Western security community concern over strategic minerals to its highest point since the end of the Cold War....

"The U.S. dependence on overseas sources of strategic minerals essential to sustain its economy and defense sector is more pronounced than its dependence upon foreign oil. Approximately 60% of the petroleum consumed in the United States is imported. By comparison the American nation depends upon overseas suppliers for over 80% of its most important strategic minerals.... There are substitutes for petroleum as a source of energy, but this is not true of many strategic minerals.

"There is not, for example, a substitute for manganese in the production of steel, or chromium in the production of stainless steel.... United States' vulnerability to a loss of access to these important mineral supplies is more pronounced today than at any time since the end of the Cold War. The uneven distribution of strategic mineral reserves and their concentration in a handful of politically unstable or potentially hostile countries makes it necessary that U.S. policymakers recognize the security of resource supply as a top national security issue."

***

At present, the U.S. is the sole military superpower. Its military expenditures approach a trillion dollars per year and are more than those of all other countries combined and ten times that of the second-ranked country, China. It possesses nearly ten thousand nuclear warheads. It is engaged in half a dozen overt and covert wars in North Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia. The purpose of this is not only to control oil resources but to create a block against its competitors, to limit the expansion of Europe and Russia and to encircle China, preparing conditions for what is portrayed as an inevitable war with China. In this, the lack of a secure supply of chromium is a major inhibiting factor in its push to war. Without a guaranteed supply of high grade chromium, the U.S. war machine will be severely inhibited. The rapid development of the Ring of Fire chromite project aims to remove a major U.S. vulnerability in case of inter-imperialist war.

No to Mining Development in the Service of U.S. War Preparations!

Return to top


Positions of the Liberals, Conservatives and NDP

The Ontario Liberal government of Dalton McGuinty has been an avid promoter of the rapid development of the Ring of Fire. Their government gave it special attention in the Speech from the Throne and the budget speeches of the past two years and in speeches by the premier and provincial cabinet ministers. The Liberals made it one of five key components in their Open Ontario Plan: "Your government will ensure the North benefits from its Open Ontario plan. In 2008, northern Ontario became home to our first diamond mine. Your government will build on that success -- particularly in the region known as the Ring of Fire. It is said to contain one of the largest chromite deposits in the world -- a key ingredient in stainless steel. There is no substitute for chromite. There is no North American producer of chromite. It's the most promising mining opportunity in Canada in a century. Echoing this, Minister of Finance Dwight Duncan in the 2010 Budget Speech, said: "For the 21st century, the discovery of chromite in the Ring of Fire could be as big as the discovery of nickel was in Sudbury in the 19th century." In the current election, the Liberals speak of incentives to cut electricity costs for the resource industry with their three-year, $450-million Northern Industrial Energy Rate program.

The Ontario Progressive Conservative Party is advocating the elimination of all barriers to the development of the Ring of Fire. "Ontario needs a robust mining industry and the good reliable high-paying jobs it brings. We will remove barriers by cutting red tape, getting energy costs under control, ensuring fair and strong land tenure and developing partnerships to bring investments in infrastructure that a strong mining industry requires," says Changebook North, the Conservatives northern policy paper. The Conservatives also call for the scrapping of the Far North Act to allow for greater resource development. Fred Gilbert, PC candidate in Thunder Bay-Atikokan said: "We will champion the Ring of Fire, representing the voice of northern Ontario throughout the entire province. We will convince people in southern Ontario that the Ring of Fire matters to them and remove all barriers to make development more effective and efficient."

The New Democratic Party is also supporting the development of the Ring of Fire. Gilles Bisson, NDP MPP for Timmins-James Bay said: "We will ensure that barriers to developing the Ring of Fire are removed so that badly needed jobs are created in the North. We will draft new land use planning rules that protect the interests of First Nations, provide clarity for development and are based on good stewardship principles of the land. We will assist in the development of infrastructure such as roads, rail and electrical transmission lines to the Ring of Fire. We will provide the local workforce with training and education opportunities so as to qualify for jobs at the Ring of Fire." The NDP's Respect for the North plan includes continuing the Northern Industrial Electricity Rate Program and extends it to include smaller companies, and amending the Mining Act so that resources such as minerals that are mined in the North are processed in the North. "Mining Tax revenue from new mines will stay in the North with First Nations and Northern Ontario municipalities to meet the challenges facing the North," says the NDP plan.

Return to top


An Issue of Sustainability

Massive deposits of chromite and nickel have been discovered in the 'Ring of Fire' under the boreal forest of northwestern Ontario and plans by Cliffs Natural Resources and Noront Resources respectively to develop them are well underway. How this development is managed by the federal and provincial governments could be historically significant for resource development in Canada.

Canada's existing nickel mines and concentrators (at Thompson, Sudbury, Reglan and Voisey's Bay), smelters and refineries (at Thompson, Sudbury and Long Harbour) are located in four provinces (Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland) and are operated by two companies (Vale and Xstrata). The development of new nickel mines and concentrators in Ontario's 'Ring of Fire' and at Nunavik (Reglan South) in Quebec by other companies demands that all four provinces give due consideration to maximizing resource efficiency and long-term sustainability on behalf of all Canadians.


(Pap by P. Whiteway)

The scale of the undertaking is huge. It could, in the next 10 years, create Canada's first chromite mine and open up a large area of northern Ontario via air, rail and road links to future mineral development. With an appropriate level of long-term visionary leadership, the Ring of Fire development could also transform Canada into the lowest-carbon-emitting source of stainless steel on the planet.

How? Well, almost all of the things that go into making stainless steel -- nickel, chromium, iron, scrap stainless steel and low-carbon emitting hyro-electric energy -- are readily available within a 500 km radius of the Ring of Fire. Putting them all to good use in a co-ordinated effort will be the challenge.

What is not in place is a co-operative agreement with the native people of northwestern Ontario and a commitment on the part of the key corporate players to protect the source of these people's livelihood -- the boreal forest. That could be a deal breaker.

A feasibility study to construct a $2-billion railway to link the isolated northern property to existing infrastructure just north of Lake Superior is expected soon.

To benefit from this unprecedented opportunity, Canadians should demand a high level of inter-provincial cooperation.

Is Canada's existing national mineral development policy sufficiently equipped to guide this process?

AT THE PRESENT TIME, CANADA'S NATIONAL MINING policy does NOT include a requirement for companies developing mineral resources to do everything possible to add value to those resources before exporting them to other countries. It should.

If it did, then metal "concentrates" would be processed here in Canada, thus maximizing benefits to all Canadians. This would include the processing of primary chromite and nickel into stainless steel. But would such an enterprise be economic?

Game-changing hydro electric developments are presently taking place in Manitoba. And, over the next few years, as the world's major economies adopt some form of carbon tax or cap-and-trade system for managing carbon emissions, this source of electrical power will give Canada a distinct competitive advantage in the global economy.

Our national mineral development strategy should, therefore, include a requirement to use mineral resources to our advantage by processing them prior to export.

The close proximity of the 'Ring of Fire' to the Thompson Nickel Belt in Manitoba, where smelting and refining facilities are in place, makes the development of a domestic stainless steel melting capacity worthy of serious investigation. Manitoba should do everything within its power to make such a 'brownfields' development attractive to existing stainless steel producers.

Such a long-term vision would be a shining example of inter-provincial co-operation, resource efficiency and sustainable development that would benefit all Canadians.

References

"Power to the (other) Provinces", by Jan Carr. Globe and Mail, Saturday, July 31, 2010. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/power-to-the- other-provinces/article1656514/

Access to land resources is an emerging sustainability issue for mining companies and environmental groups alike. In the southeastern United States, for example, coal mining companies want to mine coal by a method called mountain top removal. They are pitted against environmental groups which want to use the same mountains for erecting a string of wind turbines to generate renewable energy in perpetuity. See: "A Battle in Mining Country Pits Coal Against Wind," by Tom Ziller Jr., The New York Times, Sunday, August 14, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/business/energy-environment/15c oal.html?_r=1&hpw

Recent studies have shown that mountain top removal does negatively impact the natural environment. See: "Mountain Mining Damages Streams" by Natasha Gilbert in Nature, August 9, 2010. http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100809/full/466806a.html

Return to top


Letter to the Editor

Our Resources Stay Here!

Ontario cannot squander our precious resources or reduce the workers and people in resource related industries to hewers of wood and drawers of water and still expect to have the where-with-all to provide the infrastructure and social services needed by society. What is not produced cannot be distributed. As a society we cannot permit that our timber and our minerals are exported and processed elsewhere. Yet this is precisely what is happening and the direction we are headed in this globalized economy organized for the benefit of a handful of monopolies and governments that serve their narrow interests.

The main obstruction in resolving the question of whose resources these are and in whose interest they are to be developed, lies in the fact that the Ontario government currently plays to the tune called by the domestic and foreign finance capitalists and their monopoly interests. Instead of upholding public right it uses the state power to crush public right and uphold monopoly right. Along with  successive federal governments, successive Ontario governments directly intervene on behalf of the monopolies to wreck manufacturing and destroy productive assets in the name of attracting investment to guarantee prosperity and job creation!


Community rally against closure of Tembec pulp mill,
Smooth Rock Falls, June 23, 2006.

There are many examples. Here are but a few. When Tembec decided to close its operations in Smooth Rock Falls in 2006, citing poor market conditions, the community came up with alternative ways to use the forest resource. The government of Ontario however would not take back the harvest licences from Tembec and thus prevented the community from moving ahead with its plan. Raw logs are now shipped out for processing elsewhere.

Another example: the McGuinty government has let Abitibi-Bowater make a quick profit selling off hydro electric dams, and the water licences that go with them, knowing full well it means the paper mill will not survive in the hands of others if it has to purchase power at commercial rates. Yet Ontario granted the transfer of water licences, the latest being at Iroquois Falls, just this past year. Power generating rights belong to the people of Ontario, not to Abitibi-Bowater or any monopoly.

In Timmins the workers at the Kidd Creek Metalurgical refinery mobilized the entire community and local governments across the north in an effort to stop Xstrata from closing down and destroying what was a most modern, leading edge technology copper refinery. The Ontario government would not even consider exploring alterative uses for the site. More than a thousand direct jobs and 4,000 indirect jobs -- gone. Millions in municipal, provincial and federal revenue from the metallurgical operation -- gone. Timmins no longer processes the copper mined there. Xstrata now ships raw copper concentrate out of Ontario for smelting and refining and the metallurgical refinery is being taken apart and destroyed!

The current direction is destroying even the infrastructure necessary for processing our forest and mineral resources! Yet anyone who says "Our Resources Stay Here" is ridiculed as out of touch with the reality that we live in a globalized economy. McGuinty Liberals call it a "job killer", saying if we restrict access and monopoly right to do as they please here, our trading partners will retaliate, resulting in even more job losses.

But the workers and people of northern Ontario are not against globalization, international trade and so forth. It is neoliberal globalization, imperialist globalization and the wrecking of our economy as a result, that is rejected under the slogan Our Resources Stay Here! The workers and people of Ontario are very much in favour of international trade and commerce -- on the basis of a modern, sovereign, self-reliant economy and on the basis of mutual benefit!

A new direction is needed for Ontario and the demand Our Resources Stay Here, heard and seen across the north, is very much part of the workers opposition bringing that new reality into being.

A reader in Northern Ontario

Return to top


PREVIOUS ISSUES | HOME

Read Ontario Political Forum
Website:  www.cpcml.ca   Email:  ontario@cpcml.ca