September 29, 2011 - No. 4
40th Ontario General Election
The Demise of Good Faith Collective
Bargaining in the Ontario Public Sector -- An Election Issue
- Dave Starbuck -
Support staff from
colleges in Toronto on strike in mid-September.
• The Demise
of Good Faith Collective
Bargaining in the Ontario Public Sector -- An Election Issue -
Dave Starbuck
College Support Staff Fight for Their Rights
• College Employer
Council Forced to Negotiate an Acceptable Contract
• Community College Support Staff Strike
• McGuinty Liberals Held Accountable for
College Crisis
• October 4 Ratification Vote on
Tentative Agreement - OPSEU
Health Care Is a Right
• Government Intransigence Risks
Strike at Community Care Access Centres and Ontarians' Health
For Your Information
• Electoral Reforms Aimed at Increasing Voter
Turnout
40th Ontario General Election
The Demise of Good Faith Collective Bargaining in the
Ontario Public Sector -- An Election Issue
- Dave Starbuck -
The latest round of
contract negotiations between
Ontario community college support staff and the College Employer
Council has confirmed what the set of academic negotiations in 2008-09
revealed: there is no longer any such thing as good faith collective
bargaining in labour relations in the Ontario public
sector.
Days before the beginning of the 2007 Ontario provincial
election, the Ontario Liberals promised to recognize the right to
collective bargaining of part-time college workers as part of a review
of the Colleges Collective Bargaining Act (CCBA). With this
sleight-of-hand, they wiped the issue of the
rights of part-time college workers off the election agenda. This was
one issue that had the potential to explode in the face of the McGuinty
Liberals as OPSECAAT was prepared to challenge leading ministers at
campaign stops across the province.
College workers have paid dearly for their trust in the
Liberal Party. The Liberals reneged on their 2007 deal. The part-time
issue has not been resolved. In the fall of 2007, the Liberal
government created the Whittaker Commission to revise the old CCBA
under the hoax of "recognizing" the right of part-time and sessional
college workers to unionize. After part-time college teachers completed
their certification vote on February 5, 2009, the ballots were seized
by the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB). College lawyers have
succeeded in stalling the counting of the
representation vote ballots at the OLRB in a
process that is expected to take ten years to complete. The Whittaker
Commission provided a justification for a long list of anti-worker,
anti-union
revisions to the CCBA which were passed in 2008.
The new terms
of the CCBA were used to allow shock-and-awe tactics during the faculty
negotiations of 2008-09, with
the Council imposing a new contract, claiming a right they did not have
in the Act and manipulating the voters' list in order to obtain a razor
thin acceptance of the imposed contract.
Now, this year, we have the first round of support staff
contract negotiations under the new CCBA. Right from the beginning the
College Employer Council showed a refusal to bargain in good faith.
While the union held demand-setting meetings across the province and
came to the bargaining table with these
demands concretized as proposed contract language, the Council only
offered to discuss housekeeping items (such as changing the reference
to the CCBA from 1990 to 2008) and a wish-list of potential
concessions. After dragging their feet all summer, the Council made
their monetary offer in the media on August 26, the last
Friday afternoon preceding the strike deadline. Clearly the tone was
set and the Council was saying that only capitulation by the workers
could avert the necessity of strike action, a message that was made
crystal clear by the September 9 refusal of the College Employer
Council to accept the union's offer to return
to negotiations.
After the Second World War, a social contract was
established in Canadian society in which workers and their families
were provided with a modern level of wages, benefits, working
conditions, education, health care and pensions, etc., in exchange for
the workers accepting limitations to their political demands.
In general, although there were occasional sharp conflicts, both sides
worked within a set of parameters that recognized the validity of the
claims of each side. This social contract reached its most profound
level during the Just Society of Trudeau and the reign of Bill Davis in
Ontario. This was the time when a regime
of labour relations was established in the Ontario community college
system and that regime reflected the prevailing mores of the times. The
greatest advance was in the establishment of the faculty workload
formula in the late eighties as a result of the 1984 strike. However,
beginning with Mulroney, the anti-social
offensive of the monopolies has slowly intensified. The colleges were
increasingly starved of funds during the Rae Days and the Common Sense
Revolution of Mike Harris. While the relative economic recovery of the
first decade of the twenty-first century allowed the McGuinty Liberals
to ease the burden on the
colleges slightly, the economic crisis of 2007-08 has been used to
impose new arrangements in labour relations in Ontario, notably the
repudiation of the 2007 election political bargain to recognize the
rights of part-time college workers as part of a review of the whole
CCBA. This is justified by repeating that the
world has changed, the world has changed!
What are college workers to
do faced with this situation
where the old post-war social contract which provided for good-faith
collective bargaining between the employer and labour is no more? Now
the employer is seeking to be the sole decision-maker when it comes to
wages, benefits and working conditions
in the colleges. Workers are to fend for themselves and any rights
which workers have gained through collective bargaining are to be
negated. Provisions of law that assist the employer to exert their will
such as those that enable employers to dismiss workers from a different
bargaining unit that engage in sympathy
actions are strengthened while those that are of assistance to the
workers such as the former prohibition on the colleges employing
replacement workers are eliminated. In short, the employer is allowed
to act with impunity and the workers are increasingly restricted in the
actions that they can take in defence of their
interests.
New arrangements in public sector labour relations will
come into being. The question is whose interest will these new
arrangements serve: the public and human-centred college education or
the monopolies and capital-centred college education. This is a
political question and we are in the midst of a provincial
election. College workers will make significant progress in advancing
their interests if they firmly put the issue of Ontario's community
colleges on the agenda of this election, hold the Liberal Party to
account for its abrogation of the 2007 political bargain to recognize
part-time rights, and elect candidates who
will find a just solution to the problems facing the Ontario community
college system by recognizing the rights of all.
Fight for the Rights of All!
Hold the Liberal Party to Account!
Elect MPPs who Will Support Human-Centred College Education!
College Support Staff Fight for Their
Rights
College Employer Council Forced to
Negotiate Acceptable Contract
College
support staff rally at George Brown
College in Toronto
|
Taking political action and
making Ontario's community
colleges an election issue by picketing Ontario premier Dalton
McGuinty's
campaign stops in northern Ontario forced the College Employer
Council to return to the bargaining table, give up its obstructionism
and hammer out an agreement which
the bargaining committee can recommend. The agreement was
reached after a nineteen day strike by more than 8,000 community
college support staff. The agreement must be ratified by college
support staff workers.
Rod Bemister, chair of the
OPSEU bargaining team, said
in a press release that the union managed to secure key contract
proposals
it had brought forward. "Our position from the start of contract talks
was that this round of negotiations would be about preserving good jobs
our members currently enjoy, while at the
same time ensuring that good jobs will be in place for future college
support staff," Bemister said. "We believe we met those objectives."
The support staff and their
bargaining committee were
able to rebuff the attempt of the College Employer Council to erode the
contract language, wages and working conditions of existing workers and
to impose a two tier system for new hires. The attempt by the Council
to introduce changes to working conditions
in their proposals for flexible hours of work, a compressed work week,
and to allow students to be hired to work full days all year round, was
restricted as was the Council's proposal for a lengthened probationary
period. The bargaining committee was able to have the letter of
understanding on contracting out placed
in the collective agreement as an appendix, thereby strengthening its
standing. Changes to the grievance process and to the provisions for
union time off were agreed to. The wage offer was raised to 1.5%, 1.75%
and 2.0%, a significant improvement over the original Council offer.
The union bargaining committee
put off the issues of part-time rights and retiree benefits to a future
date.
Dalton McGuinty and the Ontario Liberal Party dread the
thought of the situation facing Ontario's community colleges being
placed
on the election agenda and becoming a major issue, as they know this
will blow up in their face. In 2007, they promised to recognize
part-time rights as part of a review of the Colleges
Collective Bargaining Act (CCBA). This succeeded in keeping
colleges
off the election agenda that year. However, the Liberals reneged on
that deal, imposing anti-worker revisions on the CCBA in 2008, while
delaying
the counting of the part-time union recognition votes at the Ontario
Labour Relations Board (OLRB). Now, as
soon as the Liberals are confronted in the election, McGuinty waves his
magic wand and the College Employer Council reverses face, stops acting
like it can dictate the terms of the contract with impunity, and in 36
hours bargains a contract that the union bargaining
committee can recommend to its members.
What is the significance of this? At a time when the
post-war social contract in labour relations has been declared null and
void, the workers find themselves increasingly restricted in waging
their economic struggles. Legislation is amended in favour of the
employer, the OLRB rules in favour of the employer
and then legislatures threaten back-to-work legislation or put severe
restrictions on workers' rights to bargain and strike in defence of
their interests. In
these
circumstances,
college
workers cannot afford to wage their
struggle in ways which were sufficient in the past but are no longer
effective today. It is necessary to find the ways which in the present
will give voice to the valid claims of college workers and college
students for a principled solution to the negation of the rights of
part-time college employees to freedom of association and of collective
bargaining, for an increase in provincial funding for Ontario's
community colleges to at least the national average and for a
human-centred college education system.
There still remains time for college
workers to work to keep the colleges on the election agenda. The more
this is done now; the more the new government will need to find an
acceptable solution to the crisis in Ontario's community colleges.
Community College Support Staff Strike
Striking college support
staff at Northern College in Timmins.
On September 18, Ontario community college support staff
reached a tentative deal with the College Employers Council (CEC) and
returned to work on September 20. Eight thousand Ontario community
college support staff, members of the Ontario Public Service Employees
Union (OPSEU), launched strike
actions on September 1 at more than 100 campuses of Ontario's 24
community colleges. This was the first strike by support staff workers
since 1979.
The college workers were forced to take this action due
to the intractable stand of the CEC, which refused to bargain in good
faith, using delaying tactics, bargaining in the press and
disinformation in an attempt to impose new arrangements in labour
relations in Ontario's colleges. The community college support
staff workers accepted social responsibility and took a courageous
stand in defence of the rights of all.
At the centre of their struggle was the demand that
wages, benefits and working conditions be maintained at a Canadian
standard, expressed in their call for good jobs, both today and
tomorrow. Their number one demand was for a resolution to the
long-existing part-time workers crisis. They demanded that the
colleges voluntarily recognize the collective bargaining rights of
part-time college support staff workers and provide job security by
agreeing that a minimum of 80 per cent of support staff work be
performed by full-time workers. The workers also sought a wage increase
in pace with inflation, asking for a three per
cent increase in each of three years, a modest demand given inflation
was running at 3.7 per cent in May. The CEC used the media to make
their wage offer of 3.25 per cent in the second and third year of the
contract, preceded by a lump-sum payment of 1.5 per cent in the first
year, which they agreed to roll into
the wage scale only in the waning hours of negotiations.
Support staff work in the registrar's, financial aid,
payroll and accounting offices; they are departmental secretaries and
receptionists; lab technicians and technologists; janitorial,
maintenance, groundskeeping, receiving and moving personnel;
information technology staff and library technicians; special needs
support
and daycare workers.
More than 10,000 part-time support staff and nearly
20,000 full-and part-time faculty were forced to cross the support
staff picket lines and perform their duties under threat of dismissal.
A support staff worker on one picket line pointed out the cynicism of
the colleges' decision to maximize the use of part-timers
when they are otherwise used as casual labour. "It shows that
part-timers can do the same job as us but don't get the same
recognition or representation," said the picketer.
Faculty, students and others at the colleges showed
their support by joining the picket lines, distributing food and drinks
and discussing the issues with everyone.
Boreal College and
Cambrian College, Sudbury
McGuinty Liberals Held Accountable for College Crisis
During their strike, Ontario community college support
staff workers
made their struggle for the rights of all and for a collective
agreement they can accept an election issue by confronting Ontario
Premier Dalton McGuinty at his campaign stops in Northern Ontario. As a
result, the College Employer Council,
which had been refusing to negotiate, was forced back to the bargaining
table.
On September 15, after being unable to evade three OPSEU
members at
a campaign stop at the Thunder Bay Bombardier plant, the premier
"indicated that he would attempt to get a mediator to the table and
make them sit in the room together until there was an agreement," said
Elaine Kerr, a support mobilizer
for OPSEU Local 612 at Sault College.
Striking college
support staff picket Premier Dalton
McGuinty's Sudbury campaign stop September 15, 2011. (Northern Life)
|
The same evening, forty striking support staff workers
from Cambrian
College and their supporters held a spirited rally outside a Liberal
election event attended by McGuinty at the Caruso Club in Sudbury. For
more than two hours, the group marched in front of the hall demanding a
return to negotiations and
a contract they can accept. McGuinty snuck into the hall with his
security detail.
Until cornered by the college support workers, the
premier had been
silent on the college support strike. Resolving the crisis in Ontario's
community colleges in favour of the students and college workers is a
political question that the Ontario Liberal Party is desperate to keep
off the election agenda because its
preoccupation is quite the opposite. The Liberal Party reneged on its
2007 election promise to recognize the right to collective bargaining
of part-time college workers and passed several anti-worker, anti-union
revisions to
the Colleges Collective Bargaining Act that were used to
impose the College Employer Council contract
during the faculty negotiations of 2008-09. It pretends to sit by as
neutral party while college lawyers
stall the counting of the part-time union recognition votes at the
Ontario Labour Relations Board. On
top of all this is the chronic underfunding of the post-secondary
education system. Dalton McGuinty and the Ontario Liberal Party must be
held accountable for the crisis in Ontario's colleges.
Break the Silence!
Ontario Colleges Are an
Election Issue!
Hold the McGuinty Liberals Accountable for the Crisis
in Ontario's Colleges!
October 4 Ratification Vote on Tentative Agreement
- Ontario Public Service Employees Union,
September 28, 2011 -
More than 8,000 full-time, permanent CAAT Support
members will be
eligible to vote Oct. 4 on the tentative contract settlement reached
Sept. 18.
Details of the ratification vote were confirmed at a
meeting Sept. 22
of representatives from the College Employer Council and OPSEU at the
offices of the Ministry of Labour in Toronto. The ratification vote
will be supervised by the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The vote will take place at all 24 community colleges
and most campuses.
By agreement of both parties, the employer will provide
employee/member lists to each union local no later than Tuesday Sept.
27; each side must confirm the lists no later than the same date.
A Notice of Vote will be posted at each college no later
than
Thursday Sept. 29, at which time we should also know the location of
all polling stations. The deadline for the list of polling stations is
Friday Sept. 30.
Mail-in ballots, which will go directly to the OLRB,
must be postmarked no later than Tuesday Oct. 4, 2011.
Preliminary results of the ratification vote should be
known by the
evening of Tues. Oct. 4 and the result will be posted to the OPSEU
website, followed by a news release. An official count will be
conducted on Oct. 13.
Health Care Is a Right
Government Intransigence Risks Strike at Community Care
Access Centres and Ontarians' Health
One of Ontarians' biggest
concerns is their access to
health care as
a basic right. This right has been under sustained attack from the
anti-social offensive implemented by successive governments at the
provincial and federal level which view public services and social
programs as a burdensome cost that must be
cut in the name of "restraint" or "austerity." The attacks on the
health care system are directed in no small part at those workers who
provide these vital services. Just one example are the more than
3,000 registered nurses and allied health professionals of the Ontario
Nurses' Association (ONA) who work as Case
Managers, Placement Coordinators, Nurse Practitioners and as other
health professionals at 10 of Ontario's 14 Community Care Access
Centres (CCACs). The ONA reported on September 27 that their members
have now entered the critical final days of bargaining, including
mediation which began on September
28. They have given their negotiating team an overwhelming 95-per-cent
strike mandate and if an agreement is not reached, these health
professionals will be on strike on October 3.
In May the negotiating team
reported on members'
concerns noting
that, "Of particular importance was the feedback on the provincial
government's restraint agenda [a proposed two-year public sector
wage freeze - Ed. Note],
which was overwhelmingly opposed. The team reviewed the government's
reasoning behind the proposed compensation freeze, as well as the
positions put forward by the Participating CCAC Employers in the
consultations that took place this past summer. If the Participating
CCACs continue to press the government's restraint agenda at the
bargaining table, it may be a very difficult round."
In a September 27 press release, ONA President Linda
Haslam-Stroud
stated, "The last thing we want is to be forced into strike action. In
fact, the last strike in this sector was more than 12 years ago.
Nevertheless, if the employers' offer leaves us with no alternative, we
will stand up for our right to a fair contract
that properly values the important contribution of these professionals
to health care."
Part of the anti-social offensive in the field of health
care has
been the restructuring of the system into Local Health Integration
Networks (LHINs).
"The merger of 42 CCACs to align with Ontario's 14 LHINs
did not
reduce the management or administration levels at CCACs as expected,"
Haslam-Stroud noted. "For example, at the North West CCAC, our members
have seen a 27-per-cent increase in administration -- and this does
nothing to enhance the
provision of the right care at the right time in the right place for
community members."
The ONA press release indicates that the block to
negotiations is
government intransigence on issues of workload and professional
responsibility, sick leave, wages and access to personal protective
equipment should there be a pandemic.
In other words, the utter callousness of the government
is such that
it would rather risk Ontarians' health by leaving communities across
the
province, already affected by health cuts, with minimal access to
health care services that these registered nurses, nurse practitioners,
registered practical nurses, occupational
and physiotherapists and social workers co-ordinate for the public.
No doubt the government will then accuse the health care
workers,
who keep the system running in spite of all the wrecking, of being the
ones to jeopardize Ontarians' health as a prelude to back-to-work
legislation and further cuts, privatization and subcontracting.
The Ontario Health
Coalition's policy proposals for the
2011 provincial election 2011 provide some facts on the present state
of disrepair of
the province's health care system:
"Wait lists for long-term
care beds, now numbering more
than 23,000,
have never been higher, while home care wait lists have numbered over
10,000 for more than a decade. [...]"
"Since 1990, more than 18,500 hospital beds have been
cut. [...]
"The rationing and cuts
have also hit smaller and rural
communities,
affecting access to hospital care particularly in those communities in
which hospitals were amalgamated in the restructuring of the mid-1990s.
[...]"
The situation demands that the government must stop the
wrecking of
the health care system and that includes bargaining with the health
professionals of the CCACs in good faith and in the best interests of
Ontarians and their right to health care.
For Your Information
Electoral Reforms Aimed at Increasing Voter Turnout
Following a review of the remarkably low voter turnout
of just over
52 per cent in the last provincial election, a number of amendments
have been made to the Ontario Elections Act based on the
conclusion that the issue is difficulty in voting so that increasing
the ease with which Ontarians can vote
will address the problem. These changes include: the introduction of
the Special Ballot to replace the proxy voting process, home visits for
housebound voters, a similar process for those hospitalized during the
election period and the introduction of new assistive voting
technology, amongst others. The Act was also
changed to permit students to vote either in their home riding or where
they temporarily reside or go to school. Provisions for voting for
people in other circumstances also exist, including those who recently
moved out of the province, those living overseas, those without a
permanent address etc.
While voting day is October 6, it is possible to vote by
special
ballot at the returning office in your riding on any day up until
October 5 at 5:00 pm CT, 6:00 pm ET. One can also apply for a special
ballot by mail or vote in advance polls until Friday, September 30 at
your local returning office.
Overall, voters will have:
- 29 days to vote in the general election (September 8
to October 6)
- 28 days to vote in person with a Special ballot at their
returning/satellite office (September 8 to October 5)
- 23 days to apply for a Special ballot to vote by mail (September 8-30)
- 15 days to vote with assistive voting technology (September 21 to
October 5)
- 10 days to vote at advance polls (September 21-30)
- 12 hours to vote on election day (October 6)
Fixed Election Date
Another electoral reform said to
be aimed at increasing voter turnout is the fixed election date.
Ontario has had fixed dates for its general elections since the Election
Statute
Law
Amendment Act was passed in 2005.
This amendment fixed the date of Ontario's
general election to every four years on the first Thursday in October
or on any day within seven days of that, if required to accommodate a
date of "religious or cultural significance," beginning in 2007, unless
the government is defeated by a vote of "no confidence" in the
Legislature. The original date, October
4, 2007, was changed to October 10 to avoid a conflict with a Jewish
holiday that fell on October 4.
The general rationale behind fixed election dates is
that it
prevents the party in power from arbitrarily calling an election for
self-serving purposes. It is thus supposed to counteract cynicism
amongst the electorate about elections and make them more inclined to
vote.
On a related note, at the federal level, while the
Harper government
violated its own commitment to hold elections on a fixed date, the
backgrounder to federal Bill C-16, passed ostensibly to institute fixed
election dates, elaborates on the logic given for such electoral
reforms. It stated in part: "The issue of fixed
election dates -- or elections at fixed intervals -- has been discussed
at some length, and acquired a certain popularity in recent years.
Fixed election dates are part of a general package of measures
designed, it is argued, to make Parliament more accountable and
democratic. Part of the reason that this issue has been
embraced by many people is that it is seen as a way of counteracting
the pervasive cynicism that exists towards politics and politicians. It
is also perhaps -- like many proposals that involve direct democracy,
with which it is often linked -- reflective of the American influence
on Canadian political institutions and
practices."
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Read Ontario Political Forum
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: ontario@cpcml.ca
|