No to the Hydro Rate Hikes!
Nation-Wrecking to Pay the Rich
No to the
Hydro Rate
Hikes!
• Nation-Wrecking to Pay the Rich
• Liberal Government Cover-Up - Edith
Cohen
• Privatization Is a Retrogressive Scam
• Government and Public Agencies in the Service
of Private Interests
• Liberal Drive to Privatize Power Production
Threatens
Canadian Control of Water - Charles Boylan
No to the Hydro Rate Hikes!
Nation-Wrecking to Pay the Rich
BC Liberal Energy Minister Bill Bennett and BC Hydro CEO
Charles Reid announced last November a five-year compounded 28 per cent
mill rate increase for electricity, with the first 9 per cent increase
coming into effect on April 1 this year. The dictated rise the people
and businesses must pay will total 45 per cent over the next 10 years
The electricity rate
increase is due fundamentally to the Liberal government pay-the-rich
privatization scheme launched in 2002 with its Energy
for Our future: A Plan for BC. The plan prevents the public
enterprise BC Hydro from developing any new power projects, with the
exception of Site
C on the Peace River. Privatization has forced BC Hydro to purchase
expensive power produced by private capitalists, the Independent Power
Producers
(IPPs).
The motive of the IPPs in
producing power is to have the
highest possible rate of return on their investment in the shortest
time. This motive comes into
contradiction with the motive of the people to have electricity
produced to serve the public interest, the socialized economy and the
social and natural
environment. Putting the private motive of the IPPs in control of an
essential public sector of the economy, which touches the well-being of
all residents
and businesses, has resulted in extremely questionable "run-of-river"
projects on BC's rivers and rapidly increasing market prices for
electricity.
The BC Liberal regime has compelled BC Hydro to purchase
privately-produced electricity through long-term contracts at rates up
to $124 per Megawatt
Hour (MWh). This price is absurdly higher than the BC Hydro price of
production of $5 to $6 per MWh at its major river facilities on the
Peace and
Columbia. During the last decade while the government was privatizing
public power with its $124 MWh IPP contracts, BC Hydro's rate for major
industrial
consumers (mines and pulp mills) has been about $40 MWh.
The state-organized IPP private contracts to provide
electricity not only represent an enormous loss of income for the
public treasury but also a new
burden on the people and businesses that now face the higher rates. The
transfer of value and money from the public and businesses to specific
owners of
IPP capital is substantial. The 2013 BC Hydro Annual Report records
$52.4 billion in future contractual commitments, of which some $51
billion are for
long-term purchases of high-priced power from the private investors.
The impact of privatization on rates is now seen in the Liberal
government's
announcement dictating 10 years of dramatic increases in the market
price for electricity. Let us unite to stop this nation-wrecking to pay
the rich.
No
to the Hydro Rate Hikes!
Defend Our Public BC Hydro!
Stop Paying the Rich!
Liberal Government Cover-Up
- Edith Cohen -
Bill Bennett, BC Minister of Energy is attempting to
rationalize his November 26 announcement of a "10-year plan" to
increase BC Hydro rates a
compounded 45 per cent. The new rate increases on top of what already
has been an alarming jump in 2013, begin at 9 per cent in April 2014,
another 6 per cent in 2015 and thereafter averaging 2 to 3 per cent a
year to 2024.
This irresponsible move will impose an enormous burden on all
individuals and
economic sectors, weighing heaviest on lower paid workers and others on
fixed incomes and on social programs such as education and health care.
First, Bennett excuses his
increase as being lower than
the one formulated in an August 11 BC Hydro Rates Working Group paper
leaked by the
Canadian Office and Professional Employees Union, Local 378. The
proposed hike was for 26.4 per cent over 2014-15.
Using one proposed number from a government agency to
obscure and soften the actual number is not credible and explains
nothing.
Secondly, Bennett says BC Hydro facilities need
upgrading, and new power produced today cannot be compared with the
evaluations for power produced
using installations built in the 1960s.
With newer and better technique and higher productivity,
the power produced today should be at a lower evaluation than power
produced with technique
and facilities over a half a century old. His second excuse is likewise
not credible and explains nothing. Besides, the Liberal government in
2002 ordered
BC Hydro to stop building any new facilities using modern technique and
advanced productivity.
The real reason for the rate increases is privatization
and a neo-liberal drive to gouge the people and their social and
economic institutions on behalf
of privileged private interests. It is neo-liberal wrecking of BC Hydro
and what the people built in the province over decades. The increased
rates are a direct
result of Liberal government policies and practices since 2002, all of
which profit private investors mainly so-called Independent Power
Producers (IPPs)
and companies such as Fortis Inc. that control BC Hydro accounts and
billing.
In 2002, the Liberal Party in power announced BC's new
Energy Plan. The cornerstone of that plan was and remains
nation-wrecking to serve the narrow
private interests of certain investors over the public interests. The
Liberal Party forbid BC Hydro from building new sources of public
energy, except for
the possible "Site C" dam and power facilities on the Peace River. The
Liberal government ordered all new power projects to be privately built
and financed
with the new power contracted to BC Hydro at high guaranteed rates on a
"take or pay" basis, which means BC Hydro must take the power whether
it needs
it or not or pay for it anyway.
Privatization of BC Hydro
Privatization of BC Hydro has dramatically changed the
way the produced value is distributed.
Before privatization, the produced value when realized
was claimed by the public enterprise for reinvestment, claimed by the
government as taxes and
a annual sizeable remittance, and passed on to buyers of electricity in
rates that were the lowest in North America. A portion of the produced
value was
claimed by moneylenders at interest rates reflecting the low level of
risk.
After privatization of parts of BC Hydro, the produced
value when realized is claimed by the owners of private equity, mainly
the IPPs but also
monopolies such as Fortis Inc; some value is still claimed by the
public enterprise and governments but buyers of electricity are facing
higher and higher
rates. A portion of the produced value connected with the IPPs is
claimed by moneylenders at interest rates reflecting those paid by
non-government enterprises. Also, the amount of value for reinvestment
in BC Hydro is less, requiring additional borrowing.
Bennett's cover-up of the real reasons behind the rate
increases ignores the reality of privatization and the seizure of
produced value by private interests
and the great harm this has done to BC Hydro and the public interest.
The neo-liberal government is forcing the people and businesses of the
province to
pay higher rates for electricity. This is a transfer of wealth to
private monopoly interests. Bennett's excuses for this retrogression
are nothing but a crude
cover-up of the reality.
Privatization Is a Retrogressive Scam
Right from the beginning, the government's actions to
create Independent Power Producers (IPPs) has been a fraud to serve
private interests at the
expense of the public interest.
Map of private
power generation projects in BC --
click to enlarge. |
The Liberal Party in power, through BC Hydro, gave the
privately-owned IPPs guaranteed contracts to supply power to BC Hydro
at inflated rates
whether it was needed or not. The government also provided the IPPs
information gathered at public expense detailing those BC rivers where
power
production during run-off is considered feasible. Whether those
projects were sustainable in the economic sense or damaging to the
natural environment was
not considered by the studies.
The owners of the IPPs took their guaranteed government
contracts at inflated rates to financial institutions to acquire credit
to build the projects. The
banks were happy to lend money as the IPPs have state guaranteed
contracts. As well, the interest rates demanded were higher than what
the banks and other
lenders could receive from direct public enterprises such as BC Hydro
or the government.
Compare IPP-Guaranteed Inflated Power Rate with Average
Market Rates
The guaranteed inflated rate the Liberal government gave
the IPPs is $124 MWh. BC Hydro sells power to the major industrial
customers at
$40 MWh. Buying IPP power for $124 MWh and selling it for $40 MWh can
hardly be called sustainable. The difference is a direct subsidy to
private
interests that is totally wasteful and retrogressive.
Also, most of the IPP contracts were signed at a time
the government and BC Hydro knew Columbia River hub prices, where
surplus BC electricity is
often sold, were fluctuating as follows:
"Index Annual Average of Daily Bilateral Day Ahead
On-Peak Prices:
ICE California-Oregon Border (COB) Hub:
$51.68/MWh (2006), 59.86/MWh (2007), 73.42/MWh (2008),
35.40/MWh (2009)
ICE Mid-Columbia (Mid-C) Hub Index
$47.98/MWh (2006), 53.59/MWh (2007), 64.48/MWh (2008),
35.25/MWh (2009)"[1]
Apart from the inflated guaranteed price, the IPP
"run-of-river" scheme is ill-suited to BC electricity needs. The
maximum production of IPP electricity
occurs during the spring-summer run-off, precisely when the major BC
Hydro dams are full of water and the entire northwest of the U.S. is
awash in
electricity. Export prices are low. During the 2013 spring-summer
run-off, the major BC Hydro dams were spilling "surplus water" over dam
tops because
government had committed BC Hydro to use the high-priced privately
produced IPP electricity.
When the guaranteed inflated contracts end in 15 to 25
years from now, all the IPP facilities will become the private property
of the monopolies that
have purchased them. These include global giants such as General
Electric and Siemens, which have purchased them from the initial IPP
investors. In this
way, the global monopolies have extended their control over BC's
economy, which is reflected in their control of the government and
state machine.
The time is now to organize for the people's empowerment
and to step up resistance against neo-liberal retrogression and fight
for a new direction for
the economy to serve the public interest.
Note
1.
http://www.ferc.gov/market-oversight/mkt-electric/northwest/elec-nw-reg-des.pdf
Government and Public Agencies in
the Service of Private Interests
The governing Liberal Party directed BC Hydro to build a
$736-million Northwest Transmission Line to carry IPP
privately-produced power to a major
new mine site. The value of the line is now said to be approaching
$1-billion.
The Red Chris copper/gold development is located 80 km
south of Dease Lake in Tahltan traditional territory in northwest
British Columbia. The private
project is owned by Imperial Metals, a metal and mining company
operating out of Vancouver with $650-million in assets. The mining
property is scheduled
to start production May 2014 and depends entirely on BC Hydro
infrastructure supplying the mine electrical power at existing public
industrial rates of around
$40 KWh. A contradiction emerges in that BC Hydro must purchase IPP
electricity at $124 KWh, carry it on a publicly supplied transmission
line valued
at $1-billion and then sell the electricity to Red Chris for $40 KWh.
Map of Red Chris
copper/gold development --
click to enlarge. |
To supply the private Red Chris mine, the public
enterprise BC Hydro is building a $1-billion transmission line
with public funds that are mostly
borrowed. The power carried on the transmission line will be supplied
by private IPP producers and bought by BC Hydro at the guaranteed
inflated rate of
around $124 MWh. After carrying the power to the Red Cross mine on the
billion dollar public transmission line, the private mine owners will
purchase
the power at a BC industrial rate of about one-third the amount paid by
BC Hydro.
This arrangement means the public treasury is
subsidizing private industry and increasing the public debt in doing
so. The arrangement solidifies class
privilege and the stranglehold of private interests over the BC
economy, including the land and resources that are owned essentially by
First Nations and
the people. This arrangement is completely wrong and against the public
interests. The land, resources and economy should be used for the
betterment and
well-being of all not a privileged few.
Site C Dam and Power Facility
The use of public funds and infrastructure to enrich
private interests is also being played out in BC's northeast. The
government has directed
BC Hydro to build a Site C dam and power facility on the Peace River.
The $8-billion infrastructure project is meant to provide electrical
power to the private
projects of Encana and other energy monopolies in the gas fields of the
northeast. The method for gas extraction called fracking requires
electricity and
water.
Map of Site C dam
-- click to enlarge. |
The public's natural resource seized by private
interests using public infrastructure will then be sent through
pipelines to the west coast and turned into
liquefied natural gas for shipping to Asia and the U.S. The
transformation to LNG needs even greater amounts of electricity.
People should grasp how the resources of the province
are being plundered for private interests using public resources with
the active connivance of
government representatives. The higher electricity rates everyone will
pay with the government's 10-year plan of rate increases are meant to
subsidize the
private profits of the IPPs and those mining monopolies ripping and
shipping raw materials out of BC. The people are subsidizing the drive
of the rich to
become richer and to consolidate their class privilege and power. This
is not a human-centred way to develop the province. The economy needs a
new
direction that serves the people and guarantees their well-being and
security.
Liberal Drive to Privatize Power Production
Threatens
Canadian Control of Water
- Charles Boylan -
The Liberal government
practice of privatizing BC rivers
is a threat to the sovereignty of British Columbia and Canada. By
virtue
of private monopoly
control over hundreds of rivers and streams to produce spring run-off
electricity at exorbitant state-guaranteed prices, the monopolies are
in a strategic position
to capture the water for export.
The southwest of the United States, including West Texas
on the border with New Mexico is using up its ground water reserves.
California Governor
Jerry Brown declared a drought emergency on January 17 to seek
federal aid to deal with the damaging symptoms of a problem long in the
making.
The paper The Last Drop: Climate Change and the
Southwest Water Crisis explains: "In the U.S. Southwest --
Arizona, California, Nevada,
New Mexico, and Utah -- there is less rain and snowfall each year
than the amount of water used in the region. Today that shortfall is
made up for by
pumping groundwater, well beyond the sustainable rate."[1]
A growing body of research suggests the assault on the
southwest water table, in addition to the practices of
monopoly-controlled agriculture in California,
is escalating with the use of water and chemicals for fracking in the
present west Texas oil boom in the Permian Basin and elsewhere. A
typical fracking
well operation to release the oil or gas consumes 5 million gallons
(U.S.) (about 1,892.5 m. litres) of water, with some seeping back
underground in a
contaminated form. Apache Corp. operates the only well in the Permian
Basin with a completely recycled process using both inflow brackish
water drawn
beneath the freshwater aquifer and outflow waste water. At present,
every other operation trucks in fresh water for fracking.
Despite the possibilities of oil monopolies and their
drilling contractors using recycling technology, the reality of the
2011
seven-month drought in West
Texas recalls the "Dust Bowl" in the 1930s. The 2011 drought was the
7th in 13 years.
The water crisis in the entire southwest is caused in
part from agricultural methods to grow wheat, corn and other crops
intensively in arid areas. Irrigation
water is drawn from aquifers, much of which evaporates or is absorbed
into the crops and removed, setting up the region for a long-term water
shortage.
Capitalist anarchy of production seeking maximum return at the fastest
speed without concern for consequences to the social and natural
environment is
leading to a "thirsty monster" in the southwest USA stalking North
America for freshwater.
BC is regarded as a region with "surplus precipitation
and water run-off." The North American Water and Power Alliance
(NAWAPA)
conceived by the
U.S. Army Engineer Corp in the 1950s and widely promoted among
political circles in both the USA and Canada in the 1960s is an example
of the arrogant
reckless imperialist ambition the ruling circles have toward the social
and natural environment and society. Among other mass displacement of
peoples to
satisfy its water and other demands, the militarist NAWAPA envisioned
the complete removal of Prince George from the map!
Less grandiose than NAWAPA (which still has some
promoters), but threatening nonetheless are plans to move fresh water
by tanker from the BC coast
to California or possibly through land-based pipelines. For example, if
the wild salmon runs on the Fraser River system were exterminated, then
that river
could be dammed for both electricity and water export. Such a scheme
was proposed in the 1950s but stopped by a then still strong fishing
industry. The
wild fishing industry has now been considerably weakened through loss
of stock caused by many human-made factors including the proliferation
of Atlantic
salmon fish farms on wild salmon migration routes.
British Columbians should think about what the
neo-liberal provincial government has created in the face of a thirsty
giant in the southwest USA. The
Liberal government has handed over control of hundreds of BC rivers to
U.S. monopolies. They are producing run-off hydro-electricity, which BC
Hydro
is forced to purchase at high state-guaranteed long-term prices driving
up local electrical bills. Under the guise of high prices for
electricity and cries of
austerity, the Liberal government could acquiesce to outright
expropriation of the water in the rivers and begin exporting river
water to the southwest USA
as a pragmatic solution to BC's economic problems. This would be
advertised as another "jobs plan" similar to Premier Clark's mania to
export other raw
material such as fracked natural gas and unprocessed wood.
Water, salmon, wood, oil,
gas, coal, gold and other
natural resources and the social and natural environment in which they
are found are precious and
the people have a social responsibility towards their well-being. The
people cannot allow the monopolies and their government representatives
to torture and
destroy them with their short-term pragmatic neo-liberal schemes for
private profit.
The people of BC have the responsibility to defend
themselves and their social and natural environment from the ravages of
monopoly right. The public
interest must come first. This begins with organized resistance to
monopoly right and its irresponsible plundering of BC's human and
natural resources.
The problems of a drought-stricken U.S. southwest cannot
and should not be solved with yet more reckless schemes of the private
monopolies. The people
cannot allow the ruling elite and private monopolies to use their
unwillingness and incapacity to build a self-reliant, independent,
crisis-free and socially
responsible economy as an excuse to plunder and wreck even further the
social and natural environment. Let's unite and organize to resist and
defeat the
schemes of monopoly right and its anti-social political power.
Note
1. The paper is available at
http://sei-us.org/Publications_PDF/SEI-WesternWater-0211.pdf
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Read BC Worker
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: office@cpcml.ca
|