January 18, 2013 -
No. 4
Affirm the Rights of First
Nations
The Struggle to Affirm Rights Is
One Struggle
March by First
Nations and supporters from Tilbury to
Ambassador Bridge, Windsor, January 16, 2013.
Affirm the Rights of First Nations
• The Struggle to Affirm
Rights Is One Struggle
• Just Demands Put Forward
to Harper - Enver Villamizar
• Métis and
Non-Status Aboriginal People Win Historic Court
Battle for Their Rights - Philip
Fernandez
• Actions Continue
Across Canada and Abroad to Affirm First
Nations' Rights
• Idle No More World Day
of Action, January 28
Affirm the Rights of First Nations
The Struggle to Affirm Rights Is One Struggle
Ambassador
Bridge, Windsor, January 16, 2013
The Workers' Opposition regards the struggle of
First Nations to affirm their rights, as the fight
of workers as well. The struggle in Canada to
guarantee the rights of all, including importantly
First Nations' hereditary, treaty and
constitutional rights concerns every worker,
senior and youth. Canada's future lies in the
fight for the rights of all! The struggle to
affirm rights is one struggle. No wall separates
the struggle of First Nations and that of the
working class.
The specificity of First Nations' rights is
theirs by virtue of being First Nations. The
struggle of the working class for the affirmation
of workers' rights in opposition to monopoly right
is theirs by virtue of being the actual producers
of value and providers of services. Those
struggles unite in the struggle of all for their
rights by virtue of being human.
The existing state and its democracy are in
crisis because they are incapable and unwilling to
guarantee the rights of all including in their
particularity the rights of First Nations and the
working class. The existing state and its
democracy are caught within the unyielding web of
monopoly right and refuse to meet the call of
history, which demands the affirmation of the
rights of all.
The
task of affirming rights belongs to all Canadians.
The fighting unity of First Nations and the
Canadian working class has the numbers,
determination, vision and aim to defend the rights
of all and bring into being new economic,
political and social arrangements that guarantee
those rights in practice.
The First Nations and working class refuse to
accept the dictate of the Harper, Quebec and
provincial governments that tell the people what
they can and cannot think, say and do. The First
Nations and the working class can think for
themselves, analyse and determine their path of
action towards the affirmation of their rights.
The agenda of Harper and other state
representatives is not the agenda of First Nations
or the working class. If it were, the rights of
all would not now be reduced to policy objectives
subjected to the pragmatic whims of the monopolies
and their narrow desires to build global empires
on the backs of the people, their land and natural
resources. A state and democracy of, by and for
the people would affirm rights as inviolable and
would guarantee First Nations and the working
class a say and control over everything that
affects their lives. How can it be otherwise in
the modern world where the people themselves must
be empowered to take control of their economic,
political and social affairs?
A nation-to-nation relationship between First
Nations and Canada cannot and will not be built
based on the agenda of the existing state and its
democracy. The concept of master and slave is
finished. The notion of a colonial conqueror and
vanquished First Nations is a lie. First Nations
have never been conquered and never will be. The
powerful movement in defence of First Nations'
rights is confirmation of that reality. A modern
definition of a nation-to-nation relationship is
developing before our eyes and will be grand to
behold in its full expression.
The Workers' Opposition has a moral and historic
duty to provide everything demanded of it by the
First Nations in the battle for their hereditary,
treaty and constitutional rights. This assistance
is integral to the struggle for workers' rights in
opposition to monopoly right and forms part of the
struggle for the rights of all. The First Nations
and Workers' Opposition are together in fighting
unity against the same enemy represented by the
Harper dictatorship and others within the existing
state and its crisis-ridden democracy. The First
Nations and Workers' Opposition along with all
justice-minded Canadians who wish to build the new
are struggling to deprive the authorities of their
power to deprive the people of their rights.
Members of
Ironworkers Local 736, Hamilton, ON, January
11, 2013
First Nations Have Rights by
Virtue of Being First Nations!
Workers Have Rights by Virtue of Being the Actual
Producers of Value and Providers of Services!
The People Have Rights by Virtue of Being Human!
Idle No More!
Harper No more!
Canada's Future Lies in the Fight for the Rights
of All!
Just Demands Put Forward to Harper
- Enver Villamizar-
Kenora, ON,
January 2, 2013
One of the demands put forward to Prime Minister
Stephen Harper was that all legislation be
consistent with the Canadian Constitution,
specifically Section 35 dealing with aboriginal
treaty rights.[1]
This is significant as it directly challenges the
two omnibus budget bills, C-38 and C-45, passed by
the Harper government.
The
first omnibus legislation dealt with changes to
environmental protection laws, especially relating
to fisheries, and gave the Minister more power
over them. This directly relates to the hereditary
rights of First Nations in terms of the fisheries.
In addition the bill contained amendments to the First
Nations Land Management Act that
facilitate First Nations making individual
agreements with the Harper government whereby they
would not be subject to provisions of the Indian
Act relating to control and decision
making over their land and resources.
The new arrangements on land management are being
made on the basis of individual First Nations
developing their own land use codes and
environmental protection laws. By using this
arrangement it appears as if the Harper government
is offering a carrot to certain First Nations in
the hopes of having relations with individual
First Nations to facilitate the theft of their
natural resources, rather than having to deal with
the issue of the treaty rights of First Nations as
a whole.
It is no coincidence that on the same day as the
mobilization of the First Nations peoples and
their supporters on Parliament Hill and across the
country, and the meetings with the AFN, that John
Duncan, Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and
Northern Development used the opportunity to
announce that "eight more First Nations will sign
onto the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land
Management (FNLM), enabling them to begin a
process to opt out of the 34 land-related sections
of the Indian
Act and assume greater control over their
reserve land and resources."
This is part of what is presented as the
"incremental approach." Now the media is trying to
claim that First Nations are against this
incremental approach, as if they want to speed up
the arrangements to put in place similar land
management deals.
This is an attempt to obscure the First Nations'
affirmation of their hereditary rights and divide
the opposition between those that want new land
deals and those that don't. By sticking to the
demands for the recognition of their rights, and
that their No means No, the First Nations are
taking a stand for the rights of all against
government dictate and nation-wrecking.
Kapuskasing, ON,
January 8, 2013; Sault Ste Marie, ON, January
11, 2013
Note
1. Excerpt from AFN
Letter to Prime Minister Harper, January 11,
2013:
"All legislation must be unquestionably
consistent with s.35 of the Canadian
Constitution and the UNDRIP [United Nations
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples]. Legislation and provisions of
legislation as in C-38 and C-45 that
contravene our Treaty and inherent rights must
be reconsidered and implementation of these
provisions be put to a halt. We must have an
environmental regulatory regime in this
country that respects our rights. Legislation
that tinkers around the edges of the Indian Act
must stop and be replaced with support for
First Nation government and nation re-building
including a mechanism for our Nations to push
away from the Indian Act as they
determine. To fulfill the original
relationship, Canada must put in place an
ongoing process that all new bills and
policies of the federal government must be in
full compliance with section 35 and consistent
with international human rights standards."
Métis and Non-Status Aboriginal People
Win
Historic Court Battle for Their Rights
- Philip Fernandez -
First
Nations people in action to affirm their
rights on the Wikwemikong Unceded Indian
Reserve,
Manitoulin Island, ON, December 30, 2012.
On January 8, 2013, Mr. Justice Michael Phalen of
the Federal Court of Canada ruled that
Métis and Non-Status Indians are "Indians"
as defined under Section 91 (24) of the British North
America Act and, therefore, must have
their rights and claims honoured by the Crown and
its government. The Federal Court hears cases that
are launched against the federal government.
The case began in 1999 when the Congress of
Aboriginal Peoples and several Métis and
Non-Status Indians led by the late Harry Daniels,
took the federal government to court. They alleged
discrimination on the basis that they were not
considered "Indians" under a section of the
Constitution Act. The Congress of Aboriginal
Peoples (formerly the Native Council of Canada) is
a political organization that represents
Aboriginal people living off-reserve in Canada.
Judge
Phalen ruled that Métis -- who for the most
part are the descendants of marriages between
Scottish or French men and First Nations women
during the period of the fur trade -- and First
Nations people who have lost their status as a
result of marrying non-First Nations men or moving
outside their reserve are "Indians" as defined in
historic documents and on the basis of expert
testimony.
He ruled that the rights of Métis and
Non-Status Indians must be based on membership
within Nations or within a Treaty group, not on
the basis of a narrow legal definition within the
Indian Act.
Judge Phalen said, "The recognition of
Métis and Non-Status Indian as Indians
under section 91(24) should accord a further level
of respect and reconciliation by removing the
constitutional uncertainty surrounding these
groups."
It is noteworthy that the Judge suggests the
refusal of the federal government to recognize the
rights of the Métis and Non-Status Indian
peoples is longstanding. In 1972, during the time
of the Trudeau Liberal government, it was known
that Métis and Non-Status Indians, who were
"lacking even the protection of the Department of
Indian Affairs and Northern Development, are far
more exposed to discrimination and other social
disabilities. It is true to say that in the
absence of Federal initiative in this field they
are the most disadvantaged of all Canadians." The
federal government now is continuing to follow the
deliberate tactics of divide and conquer and
discrimination against the almost one million
Métis and Non-Status Indians, implementing
the 19th century colonial policy of racist
oppression and genocide against all Aboriginal
peoples, which is meeting the stiffest resistance
today.
The National Chief of the Congress of Aboriginal
Peoples, Betty Ann Lavellée, stated that
this case is about "fairness, dignity,
self-worth." She pointed out that her organization
spent more than $2 million over the past 14 years
in court costs and that the money the federal
government spent trying to have the case thrown
out could have been used in "addressing some of
the key issues that the court decision speaks to."
The initial response of the Harper Government is
it will "study the decision." Given the reluctance
of the Harper government to recognize the rights
of the First Nations or anyone else except those
of the rich minority in Canada and their hired
guns, it is expected that the federal government
will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.
Nonetheless, the Federal Court decision in favour
of the Métis and Non-Status Indians is a
victory for the more than 400,000 Métis and
550,000 Non-Status Indians in Canada. It is also a
victory for the First Nations and the entire
Canadian people who are engaged in a battle for
the recognition of their collective rights and a
society that recognizes and guarantees the rights
of all on the basis of their being, including the
hereditary, treaty and constitutional rights of
the Indigenous peoples of this land.
Sudbury,
January 11, 2013
Actions Continue Across Canada and Abroad to
Affirm First Nations' Rights
Following the January 11 Day of Action across
Canada, on January 16, another wave of actions
to affirm First Nations' rights took place
across the country as well as abroad. These
actions included slow-downs and blockades of
highways and rail lines in order to increase
awareness of the situation facing First
Nations and the demand for Canada to take up
its treaty obligations.
The actions also reiterated the demands by
Chief Theresa Spence of the Attawapiskat First
Nation "for a meeting between all parties to
Treaty. This would include Chiefs, the
Governor General and the Prime Minister."
Chief Spence refused to meet with the
Prime Minister only, on an agenda set by his
Office, not the Chiefs, making it very clear
that the meeting Prime Minister Harper held
with only some of the Chiefs on January
11, did not meet the requirements. Given that
some of the fundamental treaties were signed
with the British Crown, Chief Spence and othes
are requesting that "Queen Elizabeth II send
forth her representative, which is the
Governor General of Canada."
It was reported on January 17 that Queen
Elizabeth II, whose official respresentative
in Canada is the Governor General, has
declined to intervene in the situation. This
was revealed in a letter dated January 9 from
the deputy to the senior correspondence
officer of Buckingham Palace responding to a
December 15 letter from a BC resident. "This
is not a matter in which The Queen would
intervene," says the letter. "As a
constitutional Sovereign, Her Majesty acts
through her personal representative, the
Governor General, on the advice of her
Canadian Ministers and, therefore, it is to
them that your appeal should be directed."
Chief Spence has been on a hunger strike for
38 days now, taking only fish broth and herbal
teas. She is joined by Manitoba Elder Raymond
Robinson who has vowed to die for their people
along with Chief Spence in order to see the
fulfillment of their demands for the
elimination of the conditions facing First
Nations across Canada. Mi'kmaq elder Jean Sock
had to end his hunger strike after 28 days on
January 14 to attend to his gravely ill mother
in New Brunswick.
The Idle No More movement has also called a
world day of action for Monday, January
28, when MPs return to Parliament.
Vancouver
Victoria
Prince
George, BC
Edmonton
Iqaluit
Rail
Blockade, Portage La Prairie, MB
Cochrane,
ON
Windsor,
ON
Cayuga,
ON
Caledonia,
ON
Toronto
Information
Blockade by Alderville First Nation, Rice
Lake, ON
Rail
Blockade by Tyendinaga Mohawk, Marysville,
ON
First
Nations Youth Begin 1,100 km Trek to
Ottawa
from Whapmagoostui, QC on James Bay
Kanehsatake,
QC
Gesgapegiag,
QC
Fredericton
Miramichi,
NB
United
States
Hawaii
Lawrence,
Kansas
Madison,
Wisconsin
Lansing,
Michigan
Toledo, Ohio
Around
the World
Queen
Victoria Fountain, London, UK
Genoa, Italy
Canadian
Consulate, Tamaki Makaurau, New Zealand
Sydney,
Australia
Idle No More World Day of Action, January 28
The Idle No More Movement (INM) has called for
a world Day of Action on January 28. In a
January 10 press release, organizers state in
part:
"This day of action will peacefully protest
attacks on Democracy, Indigenous Sovereignty,
Human Rights and Environmental Protections when
Canadian MPs return to the House of Commons on
January 28th. As a grassroots movement, clearly
no political organization speaks for Idle No
More. This movement is of the people. For the
People!
"The Vision of IDLE NO MORE revolves around
Indigenous Ways of Knowing rooted in Indigenous
Sovereignty to protect water, air, land and all
creation for future generations.
"The Conservative government bills beginning
with Bill C-45 threaten Treaties and this
Indigenous Vision of Sovereignty. [...]
"This message has been heard around the world
and the world is watching how Canada responds to
the message sent by many INM Supporters.
"INM urges the government of Canada to repeal
all legislation; which violates Treaties,
Indigenous Sovereignty and subsequently
Environmental Protections of land and water.
[...]"
TML calls on everyone to go all out to
press the just demands of the First Nations on
January 28 and beyond and work for Canada to
establish just relations with the First Nations
in respect of their hereditary, treaty and
constitutional rights.
Read The
Marxist-Leninist Daily
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|