March 5, 2012 - No. 29
International Tour in Support of
Locked-Out Rio Tinto Workers in Alma, Quebec
"Organize, Unite, Fight!"
- Interview, Marc Maltais, President,
Syndicat des travailleurs de l'aluminium d'Alma -
Australian Rio Tinto
workers in Bell Bay, Tasmania give their enthusiastic support
to the locked-out Alma workers, February 28, 2012. (STAA)
International
Tour
in
Support
of
Locked-Out
Rio
Tinto
Workers
in
Alma,
Quebec
• "Organize,
Unite, Fight!" -
Interview, Marc Maltais, President, Syndicat des
travailleurs de l'aluminium d'Alma
• The Truth About
Rio Tinto Alcan's Global
Claim of "No Labour Disputes" - Pierre Chénier
Quebec Student Movement
• Government
Responds to Students' Legitimate
Demands with Tear Gas
Letter to the Editor
• Home Care in
Halifax
International Women's
Day
• Rally and March
in Toronto
International Tour in Support of
Locked-Out Rio Tinto Workers in Alma, Quebec
"Organize, Unite, Fight!"
- Interview, Marc Maltais, President,
Syndicat des travailleurs de l'aluminium d'Alma -
Delegation representing
locked-out Alma workers meets with harbour workers in Sydney, Australia.
The delegation from Syndicat des travailleurs de
l'aluminium d'Alma
(STAA) and United Steelworkers (USW) Quebec section has been in
Australia since February 25, after a successful visit to California and
Utah in the U.S. The delegation is composed of Marc Maltais, the STAA's
President and Guy Farrell, the Assistant to the Quebec
Director of USW.
The first stop in Australia was a meeting with the
Organizing
Committee of the National Convention of the Maritime Union of Australia
(MUA). The Convention was held February 26 to March 2 under the theme
"Organize,
Unite, Fight!" The MUA represents around 14,000 dock workers,
seafarers, divers, port workers and office staff.
Maltais told TML one of the highlights of the
Australian
tour was the support the Alma workers received after their presentation
to Convention participants on March 1.
"We were part of a panel of international guests. We
explained the
issues involved in the Alma struggle and the need to build
international solidarity. We made the point that the international
solidarity expressed in 2010 for the locked-out Rio Tinto miners in
Boron, California, played a big role in ending the lockout in a way
that was
acceptable for the workers and the same applies to us in Alma. We
received financial support and a commitment that these workers are
going to send representatives to the actions in Alma at the end of
March. They gave us a standing ovation and we are going to use the
video of our participation in the Convention on our Facebook page so
our
workers on the picket lines can see the kind of support we got there."
After their presentation to the Convention the two
workers had an
exchange with representatives of the workers at the BlueScope Steel
plant in Port Kembla. The delegation also had a moving discussion with
a representative of the workers of Papua New Guinea. The residents of
Bougainville Island, Papua New Guinea blame Rio Tinto for its
participation in the violent attacks of the Australian government and
the Papua New Guinea government against the uprising of the people of
Bougainville Island in the 1980s, where Rio Tinto operated one of the
world's biggest open pit copper mines. Bougainville residents have been
pursuing a class action lawsuit in the U.S. against Rio Tinto
since 2000 for environmental degradation and war crimes.
"Our brother from Papua will take our banner there to
Bougainville
Island and have it signed by the people in expression of support for
our struggle," said Maltais.
There was a busy schedule of meetings between
February 26 and
March 1. The delegation met with dock workers from Sydney's two ports
at a general membership meeting and had lively exchanges with them. It
then met with representatives of the workers at two Rio Tinto aluminum
smelters -- the Bell Bay smelter in Tasmania and the
Tomago plant near Newcastle. The Tomago facility was formerly Pechiney
and Maltais told TML
the workers there experienced the same stepping up of attacks against
the union and the collective agreement as the Alma workers did when Rio
Tinto seized control of Alcan in 2007.
"Rio Tinto's actions in Bell Bay are particularly
shameful," Maltais
said. "Rio Tinto used changes in labour laws to break the union.
Workers lost their union and are now fighting to unionize once again
but Rio Tinto is trying to block them from doing so at every step. The
meeting with the Tomago workers was also very interesting because
we had an exchange about the crisis of the manufacturing sector and
could see parallels between their situation and ours. These meetings
were as informative for them as they were for us."
The delegation met with representatives of the
Construction,
Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), a union that is waging
bitter fights against Rio Tinto's anti-worker and anti-union attacks.
Maltais explained:
The Jim Comerford
Memorial Wall.
|
"We met with the International Executive Committee and
with
representatives of 3,000 workers who work in three Rio Tinto mining
operations and had an exchange of experience. It was shocking to see
how similar our experience is, how Rio Tinto is trying to use any space
they can find to attack the workers, how they are trying to use any
law, any possibility of violating the collective agreements and how
they use violence in labour disputes. The language we speak is
different, the product we make is different, but the rest is the same.
We went to the head office of CFMEU and saw the [Jim Comerford]
Memorial Wall in memory
of the 1,800 miners who have died in the mines in this district since
the beginning of the nineteenth century. These 1,800 names represent
only those who have been counted because there is no record of those
who first died there -- prisoners who not only worked in the mines but
lived and died there at work. There is no record of their names and
numbers. This Memorial Wall is quite majestic."
The delegation found the same high spirits of fighting
unity in Australia as in the U.S. Maltais reports:
"Wherever we went we gave the same message: we are not
here for
charity but for international solidarity. We are convinced that
international solidarity between workers is key to bringing Rio Tinto
back to the bargaining table to negotiate with us so we can get
satisfaction for our demands. We are fighting for a just return for our
work and
the use of our natural resources. We are asking that Rio Tinto
re-examine its strategy and negotiate with us in good faith. We have
the same desire as all workers: to make sure our communities make
headway in life and prosper. In spite of what the Rio Tinto executives
are saying, we are not here to throw mud at them, we are here to learn
about
the experience of other Rio Tinto workers and frankly what we see here
is even worse than what we thought in terms of Rio Tinto's actions
internationally."
The delegation is in Australia until March 7 when it
heads to New Zealand. It is expected back in Alma on March 10.
The delegation rallies
with supporters from the Maritime Union of
Australia
outside Rio Tinto's offices in Brisbane, March 5, 2012. (STAA)
The Truth About Rio Tinto Alcan's
Global Claim of "No Labour Disputes"
- Pierre Chénier -
As TML Daily has pointed out, Rio Tinto
executives in
Alma boast there have been no labour disputes at Rio Tinto Alcan
facilities worldwide in the last 15 years (March
1, 2012 - No. 27). Alma
workers are presented as disrupters of an otherwise well-established
pattern of good labour relations
wherever Rio Tinto Alcan operates. Rio Tinto Alcan portrays itself as a
good corporate citizen that brings benefits to workers and communities,
is more than willing to negotiate with unions and is merely facing
intransigence from the Alma union.
On the contrary, every day the Alma workers face the
fact that Rio
Tinto Alcan
refuses to recognize the union as the workers' legitimate defence
organization and is constantly invoking unfettered management rights to
impose its will. The current lockout is the most blatant and violent
expression of this. When Rio Tinto
Alcan says that nowhere else in the world does it have a labour dispute
with
its workers, it is attempting to negate the history of attacks against
the workforce, like those it is carrying out today, and not only at
Alma. While
Rio Tinto presents these attacks and workers' resistance as an example
of a situation free of labour disputes,
it is known worldwide for doing
everything it can to block workers from organizing themselves into
trade unions. It does not even recognize unorganized workers as
part of the world of labour. Its frantic attempts to prevent workers
from unionizing, and even to de-unionize existing
unions are dramatic exposures of the kind of "labour dispute-free"
record it claims to have. Besides anything else, this strategy is at
play in Alma where an aim of the lockout is to force the reduction
of the number of unionized workers at the facility so the critical mass
of workers needed to be able to wage an
effective fight in defence of their rights and the rights of all is
progressively lost.
The protracted war Rio Tinto Alcan has waged for close
to 20 years
against the workers at the Bell Bay aluminum smelter in Northern
Tasmania to block them from unionizing is a classic example of this.
The Rio Tinto Alcan smelter at Bell Bay was Australia's
first
aluminum smelter and started production in 1955. The operation employs
over 500 workers. Rio Tinto Alcan states the two favourable factors
that led to its building of the facility in Tasmania are the low cost
for hydro-electric power
and the deep water port facilities.[1]
The smelter is one of the main
employers in Bell Bay and for the city of Georgetown, five kilometres
away. The
possibility for local people to find employment outside of the smelter
and the businesses connected with it is very limited. Costs of
electricity and pollution control and the advanced age of the facility
are constantly used by
Rio Tinto Alcan as " arguments" to force workers to accept lower wages
and health and safety standards than those in place at the other
aluminum smelters in Australia. This is the way, workers are told, to
give the owners the flexibility they need
to keep the facility competitive with the others.
Protest at Rio
Tinto's AGM against the company's refusal to permit collective bargaining by
its
Australian workers,
Brisbane, May 24, 2000. (ICEM)
|
The Australian Workers' Union (AWU), which is attempting
to unionize
the facility, estimates the Bell Bay workers make $20,000 a year less
than other smelter workers in Australia. This discrimination, says the
union, is obvious as workers living across the Bass
Strait that separates Tasmania from mainland Australia are better paid
for doing exactly the same jobs.
"Rio should be putting more money into the Tasmanian
economy by
paying their workforce decently. Instead, the $20,000 they save ends up
in the pockets of the London head office executives. London doesn't
need the money. The Launceston economy would be better off if this pay
went to local families,"
says the AWU in a communiqué.
The Bell Bay site was unionized for many years. It was
de-unionized
in 1996 when Rio Tinto used the labour laws passed by the Howard
government to attack workers under the hoax of giving them freedom of
choice. Workers were put on individual contracts as were those at Rio
Tinto's iron ore operations
in the Pilbara region of Western Australia.
In the past two years or
so, the union has launched a
campaign to
re-unionize this site, along with other non-union sites in the aluminum
sector. The union reports that Rio Tinto Alcan is frantically
attempting to block workers' efforts, repeatedly going to the courts to
prevent the union from freely talking to
the workers, threatening the workers that if they decide to sign a
negotiated collective agreement all their current working conditions
are "on the table" and could be reduced. Once again, the argument
presented is that the current "flexibility" of the work force and
working conditions are a must if workers want to
keep their employment in a facility that needs to compete with more
modern ones.
While the conditions and work may be different at Rio
Tinto's various global operations, the monopoly's strategy in each
place is
the same. In the name of flexibility and competitiveness, Rio Tinto
demands the lowering of all working and living conditions and the
weakening of the union. This is one of the lessons learned by the
delegation representing the Rio Tinto workers in Alma, Quebec during
their international
tour as they have joined with other workers to oppose the exploitation
of their
common employer.
The AWU reports that so far
about 70 per cent of the
Bell Bay workers have
expressed support for a union-negotiated collective agreement.
According to the union, Rio Tinto replied by warning the workers that
their current pay and conditions could be under threat if they continue
demanding a collective agreement.
The company has sent personal letters to workers' homes warning it may
be
a bad time to move towards collective bargaining.
The union reports Rio Tinto
Alcan
to date has gone to court several
times unsuccessfully, to prevent the union from discussing with the
workers during their breaks issues of health and safety and
other matters of concern to them.
These issues are very serious as workers report many recent "near
misses" that could have led to
tragedy. They are also reporting high levels of dust, fumes and
respiratory hazards that might cause cancer and asthma.
According to AWU, in December 2010 the Tasmanian
Workplace Safety
Inspector issued instructions to Rio Tinto to allow the union into the
workplace to talk about health and safety with the workers. Rio Tinto
went to the Supreme Court of Australia to cancel the inspector's
orders. In January
2011, the Supreme Court
dismissed Rio Tinto's application. The company appealed the decision
but its appeal was dismissed once again in February 2011. Rio Tinto
made it
clear that it will keep using legal avenues, amongst other methods, to
prevent workers from freely discussing with the union.
The situation at Bell Bay is part of Rio Tinto Alcan's
track record
of attacks against the workers and their efforts to build their defence
organizations.
Notes
1. Rio Tinto Alcan website.
Quebec Student Movement
Government Responds to Students'
Legitimate Demands with Tear Gas
As of March 5, more than 120,000 students are on strike
in Quebec.
Responding
to the call from the Broad Coalition of Student Union Solidarity
(CLASSE) and the Table de concertation étudiante du
Québec (TaCEQ),
nearly 10,000 students from all corners of Quebec once again took to
the streets, this time in Quebec
City, to reiterate their determination to block the tuition fee
increase the government has imposed. They gathered in Parc des Braves
and made their way to the National Assembly. "[Those on strike] will
remain so as long as Minister
[of Education Line Beauchamp] persists. The students' anger will not be
appeased.
The government must quickly retract its measure," said Gabriel
Nadeau-Dubois, co-spokesman for the CLASSE, which represents about 75
per cent of striking students.
The movement has now expanded across the province. "The
Lanaudiere
and Gaspé regions, the Eastern Townships, the Laurentians, and
the
Outaouais, Montérégie and Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean regions
have joined
the general strike. Quebec is united against the Liberal government's
measures, which will close
university doors to thousands of people," added Jeanne Reynolds,
co-spokesperson for the CLASSE.
The Coalition announced that it would join the various
activities
planned for March 8, International Women's Day. "The Simone Beauvoir
Institute recently said that the tuition fee increases would
particularly affect women, especially because they earn an average of
70 percent of men's salaries. We will be in
the streets on March 8 with all the feminist organizations to remind
the Liberal government of this!" Reynolds added.
The student associations which make up CLASSE held a
congress over
the weekend at Marie-Victorin College in Montreal to take stock of
the strike. Following the congress the Coalition will announce its
action plan.
The Liberal's stubbornness with respect to
post-secondary education
funding demonstrates the government's detachment, to the detriment of
the less affluent: the students, said Simon Gosselin, general
secretary of the TaCEQ. "The government is questioning the values and
principles that Quebeckers established
in order to build a more just society. Today Quebec students say loud
and clear that investing collectively in education is investing in
Quebec's future."
Xavier Lafrance also spoke in support of education to
the thunderous
applause of the crowd. He was a student leader of the Coalition of
Student Union Solidarity during the 2005 strike against the Charest
government's decision to transform $105 million in bursaries to student
loans.
Backed into a corner, the Minister of Education's latest
reply
to students was that, "The decision has already been taken. It's a
budgetary decision."
As if that wasn't enough she added, "A large number of
university
and college students understand this issue and refuse to partake in the
boycott."
This is a blatant lie to try to rally the people to the
government's
anti-social agenda. Anyone with eyes can see the students'
determination is gaining momentum and they are receiving increased
support.
Far from welcoming the students in a civilized manner
and meeting
with the spokespersons to hear their demands, the National Assembly was
transformed into a virtual fortress under siege. Before the
demonstrators could disperse the Crowd Control unit of the
Sûreté du
Québec (Quebec Provincial police) launched
tear gas into the crowd. This brutal action, condemned by all the
demonstrators and by MNAs Denis Trottier and Amir Khadir, must not
go unpunished.
No to the Criminalization of Dissent!
Support the Just Struggle of the Students!
Letter to the Editor
Home Care in Halifax
Thank you for the recent
article on the Halifax Transit strike ("Making Claims on Society --
'In this Economy,'" TML Daily,
March 1, 2012 - No. 27). It helps to bring attention to what is
becoming
a very serious labour dispute. As someone who works as a home support
worker throughout the Halifax
Regional Municipality (HRM), I am usually dependent on public transit
to get to clients' houses and many of us are wondering why the strike
hasn't been settled yet after almost a month.
According to what I have read the most insurmountable
issue has been
scheduling which has been the long standing practice of allowing bus
drivers to pick their preferred shifts in order of seniority. For those
transit workers who have been there longest it means being able to fit
their work schedules around their
personal lives. HRM claims that it is the cause of extra overtime, a
claim that the union disputes since it is management that actually
plans the shifts and many of them have overtime built into them.
On February 1, just before
the strike began, HRM offered
to take
rostering off the table if the union accepted the rest of their offer
which amounted to 70 take-aways including a demand for contracting out
work and another demand for hiring part-timers who would have less
union protection and possibly less
training and experience for the demanding, high-stress job. The union
rejected this offer and the strike began. Afterwards, it was announced
that HRM had put rostering back on the table, and removed the other two
major points of contention. The latest news is that the HRM Council has
rejected the offer of binding
arbitration which the union made on February 14, and has made an
ultimatum that its last 'final' offer must be accepted by the end of
Friday, March 2, 2012 or negotiations will have to begin all over again
with HRM's original 270 demands back on the table.
During all these shifts in the negotiations, we have
been forced to
rely on various means to get around, including walking, bicycling and
arranging rides. Many things which we have to do outside of work have
been postponed because of the strike. Travelling around town is now
more tiring, more time consuming
and even more expensive if cabs are required.
Why is a settlement taking so long? Aside from the usual
anti-labour propaganda several things have come to light. One is that
the
city is saving $85,000 per day while the strike continues. So it can
gain revenue by not providing transit service. Another thing is the
obvious fact that from the beginning
the HRM has been demanding a large number of concessions aimed at
reducing or eliminating the power of the union such as the three issues
mentioned above. As well, the HRM has been demanding concessions in
wages and benefits such as wage increases that are lower than the
increase in the cost of living.
The situation reiterates the need to have a new
human-centred direction for the economy and the need to build the
Workers' Opposition.
A Home Care Worker in Halifax
International Women's Day 2012
Rally and March in Toronto
The focus of the March 3 International Women's Day (IWD)
rally and
march in
Toronto, held under the banner "Reclaim Our City -- We Are Stronger
Together," was resistance to cuts and privatization of public services
and to the attacks on the workers who provide them. The
2011 IWD march and rally, which
raised the slogan "Our City, Our Services, Our Future -- Women Take Up
the Fight," was the first mass action against the Ford regime after it
was elected, a speaker from CUPE
Local
4400 said in opening the rally. Women make up the majority of the city
workers and
women have been in the forefront of fighting the cuts to public
services on which everyone depends, she said and affirmed that women
will continue to fight for good
jobs for all and for our services and our dignity.
Women from CUPE Local 79 in which
Toronto's
inside workers are organized and CUPE Local 4948 which represents the
library workers also spoke. Some 75 per cent of these public sector
workers are
women and many work part-time. Both locals are fighting demands
for concessions
in negotiations with the city and have been active in fighting, with
some successes, cuts to the city services they provide.
Provincial public sector workers were also out in
numbers and
demanded a stop to the cuts to services being proposed by the McGuinty
government through the Drummond Report on the reform of Ontario's
public services. A contingent from the Workers'
Action Centre focused on the demand that the McGuinty government
rescind $6 million
in cuts to funding for the enforcement of labour standards. Everyone
was called on to mobilize for the April 21 Day of Action at Queen's
Park against the cuts to public services.
Following the rally the city workers led a march of
some 1,000 people. Activists of the Workers' Centre of CPC(M-L)
distributed the latest issue of Workers'
Forum and Ontario Political
Forum.
Their red flags and banner proclaiming "Our Security Lies in the Fight
for the Rights of All" were a bold presence. The march made its way
through the downtown, stopping at City Hall where people set out their
slogans and demands in chalk, before concluding at the IWD Fair at
Ryerson University.
Read The Marxist-Leninist
Daily
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|