In March of 1970, after massive nationalist demonstrations, he managed to have British soldiers evacuated from the country and in June, the United States vacated the great air base near Tripoli, handing it over to military instructors from Egypt, a Libyan ally. In 1970, several western oil companies and banking companies having the participation of foreign capital were affected by the Revolution. At the end of 1971, the famous British Petroleum had the same fate. In the agricultural sector, all Italian properties were confiscated, and the colonists and their descendents were expelled from Libya. State intervention was directed to the control of the great companies. Production in that country came to enjoy one of the highest levels in the Arab world. Gambling and the drinking of alcohol were prohibited. The traditionally limited legal status of women was improved. The Libyan leader got involved in extremist theories that were opposed both to communism and capitalism. It was a stage when Gaddafi dedicated himself to theorizing, something that doesn't have any place in this analysis, other than to point out that the first article of the Constitutional Proclamation of 1969 established the "Socialist" nature of the Great Socialist People's Libya Arab Jamahiriya. What I wish to emphasize is that the United States and its allies were never interested in human rights. The hornet's nest taking place in the Security Council, at the meeting of the Human Rights Council at the Geneva headquarters and in the UN General Assembly in New York was pure theatre. I completely understand the reactions of the political leaders involved in so many contradictions and sterile debate, given the tangled web of interests and problems they must look after. We all know very well that the character of permanent member, the power of veto, the possession of nuclear weapons and quite a few institutions are sources of privileges and interests imposed by force onto humankind. One can agree or not with many of them, but one can never accept them as fair or ethical measures. The empire now wants to see events revolve around what Gaddafi may or may not have done, because it needs to intervene militarily in Libya and strike a blow at the revolutionary wave unleashed in the Arab world. Up to now, not one word was said; they kept their mouths shut and carried on with business. With the latent Libyan rebellion being promoted by Yankee intelligence, or by Gaddafi's own errors, it is important that the people don't let themselves be deceived, since very soon world opinion shall have enough elements to know what to expect. In my opinion, and that's what I said from the very first instant, we must denounce NATO's war-mongering plans. Like many Third World countries, Libya is a member of NAM [the Non-Aligned Movement], the Group of 77 and other international organizations, through which relations are established separately from its economic and social system. As an outline: the Revolution in Cuba, inspired by Marxist-Leninist principles and those of Marti, had triumphed in 1959, 90 miles away from the United States which imposed on us the Platt Amendment and owned the economy of our country. Almost immediately, the empire promoted the dirty war against our people, counter-revolutionary gangs, the criminal economic blockade, the mercenary invasion of the Bay of Pigs, watched over by an aircraft carrier and their Marines ready to land if the mercenaries were to gain determinate objectives. Just a year and a half later, they threatened us with their nuclear arsenal. A nuclear war was on the point of breaking out. All the Latin American countries, with the exception of Mexico, took part in the criminal blockade which is still in place today, with our country never surrendering. It is important to be reminded of this, for those lacking historical memory. In January of 1986, using the idea that Libya was behind the so-called revolutionary terrorism, Reagan ordered economic and commercial relations with that country to be broken. In March, a force of aircraft carriers in the Gulf of Sidra, inside what is considered to be Libyan national waters, launched attacks that caused the destruction of several naval units armed with missile launchers and coastal radar systems that that country had acquired in the USSR. On April 5th, a Berlin disco that U.S. soldiers went to was the victim of plastic explosives; three persons died, two of them American soldiers, and many were wounded.
Reagan accused Gaddafi and ordered the Air Force to retaliate. Three squadrons took off from the Sixth Fleet aircraft carriers and bases in the United Kingdom, attacking seven military targets in Tripoli and Benghazi with missiles and bombs. Around 40 people died, 15 of them civilians. Warned of the bombers' advance, Gaddafi assembled his family and was abandoning his residence located at the Bab Al Aziziya military complex to the south of the capital. The evacuation was in progress when a missile made a direct hit on his residence; his daughter Hanna died and two other children were wounded. The occurrence was broadly condemned: the UN General Assembly passed a resolution condemning violation of the UN Charter and International law. So did NAM, the Arab League and the OAU, in energetic terms. On December 21, 1988, a Pan Am Boeing 747 flying from London to New York disintegrated in mid-air after a bomb exploded; the remains of the plane fell over Lockerbie and the tragedy tolled 270 lives, of 21 nationalities. At first the U.S. government suspected Iran acting in retaliation for the death of 200 persons in the downing of an airbus from its state airline. According to the yankees, investigations implicated two Libyan intelligence agents. Similar imputations against Libya were made for a French airliner on the Brazzaville-N'Djamena-Paris route, implicating Libyan officials that Gaddafi refused to extradite, for facts he categorically denied. A sinister legend was fabricated against him with the participation of Reagan and Bush Sr. From 1975 up to the final stage of the Reagan government, Cuba had devoted itself to its internationalist duties in Angola and other African countries. We were aware of the conflicts developing in Libya, or around it, because of reading material or eye-witness accounts written by people who were closely connected to that country and the Arab world, as well as because of the impressions we had about various personalities from different countries with whom we had been in touch during those years. Many well-known African leaders with whom Gaddafi had close ties tried to seek solutions for the tense relations between Libya and the United Kingdom. The Security Council had imposed sanctions on Libya that were starting to be overcome when Gaddafi accepted to put the two people accused for the plane downed over Scotland on trial, with certain conditions. Libyan delegations began to be invited to inter-European meetings. In July of 1999, London initiated the re-establishing of full diplomatic relations with Libya, after some additional concessions. In September of that year, the European Union ministers accepted withdrawing the restrictive measures on commerce that had been taken in 1992. On December 2nd, Prime Minister Massimo D'Alema of Italy made the first visit of a European head of government to Libya. With the USSR and the European Socialist bloc gone, Gaddafi decided to accept the demands of the United States and NATO. When I visited Libya in May of 2001, he showed me the ruins caused by the traitorous attack with which Reagan had killed his daughter and had been on the point of exterminating his entire family. At the beginning of 2002, the State Department informed that diplomatic talks were going on between the U.S. and Libya. In May, Libya had been included again on the list of states sponsoring terrorism even though, in January, President George W. Bush had not mentioned the African country in his famous speech on the members of the "axis of evil." As 2003 began, because of the economic agreement on the compensations reached between Libya and the suing countries, the United Kingdom and France, the UN Security Council lifted the 1992 sanctions against Libya. Before 2003 drew to a close, Bush and Tony Blair informed about an agreement with Libya, a country that had handed over to United Kingdom and Washington intelligence experts documentation on the non-conventional weapons programs such as ballistic missiles with a range of more than 300 kilometres. Officials from both countries had already visited various installations. It was the result of many months of talks between Tripoli and Washington as Bush himself revealed. Gaddafi fulfilled his promises of disarmament. In a few months Libya handed over five units of Scud-C missiles with a range of 800 kilometres and the hundreds of Scud-Bs whose range surpassed the 300 kilometres for short-range defensive missiles. From October of 2002, the marathon of visits to Tripoli began: Berlusconi in October of 2002; José María Aznar in September of 2003; Berlusconi again in February, August and October of 2004; Blair in March of 2004; Germany's Schröeder in October of that year; Jacques Chirac in November of 2004. Everybody was happy. Mr. Money is a powerful gentleman. Gaddafi triumphantly toured Europe. He was received in Brussels in April of 2004 by Romano Prodi, president of the European Commission; in August of that year the Libyan leader invited Bush to visit his country; Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco and Conoco Philips finalized the re-establishing of extracting crude by means of joint ventures. In May of 2006, the United States announced the withdrawal of Libya from the list of terrorist countries and the establishment of full diplomatic relations. In 2006 and 2007, France and the U.S. signed agreements for nuclear cooperation for peaceful purposes; in May of 2007, Blair once again visited Gaddafi at Sidra. BP signed an "enormously important" agreement according to statements, in order to explore for gas fields. In December of 2007, Gaddafi made two visits to France and signed contracts for military and civilian equipment for the total of 10 billion Euros; and a visit to Spain where he met with President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Million-dollar contracts were signed with important NATO countries. What is it that has now caused the precipitated withdrawal from the embassies of the United States and the other NATO members? It's all extremely odd. George W. Bush, father of the stupid anti-terrorism war, stated on September 20 of 2001 to the West Point cadets that: "Our security will require [...] transforming the military you will lead, a military that must be ready to strike at a moment of notice in any dark corner of the world. And our security will require all Americans to be forward-looking and resolute, to be ready for preemptive action when necessary to defend our liberty and [...] our lives. "We must uncover terror cells in 60 or more countries [...] Along with our friends and allies, we must oppose proliferation and confront regimes that sponsor terror, as each case requires." What will Obama think about that speech? What sanctions will the Security Council impose on those who killed more than a million civilians in Iraq and on those who every day are killing men, women and children in Afghanistan, where in recent days the enflamed population thronged into the streets to protest the massacre of innocent children? An AFP dispatch from Kabul, dated today on March 9th, reveals that: "Last year was the most deadly for civilians in nine years of war between the Taliban and international forces in Afghanistan, with almost 2,800 dead, 15% more than in 2009, a UN report indicated on Wednesday, underlining the human cost of the conflict for the population." "...the Taliban insurrection intensified and gained ground these last few years, with guerrilla actions further from its traditional bastions to the south and east." "With exactly 2,777 the number of civilian deaths in 2010 increased 15% as compared to 2009, indicates the annual joint report by the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan..." "President Barack Obama stated on the 3rd of March his 'profound condolences' to the Afghan people for the nine dead children; U.S. General David Petraeus, commander in chief of the ISAF and Secretary of Defence Robert Gates made similar statements." "...the UNAMA report emphasizes that the number of civilian dead in 2010 is four times greater than the number of international forces soldiers killed in combat in that same year. "The year 2010 has been by far the most deadly year for foreign soldiers in nine years of war, with 711 dead, confirming that the Taliban guerrilla war has intensified despite the sending of 30,000 U.S. reinforcements last year." For 10 days, in Geneva and in the UN more than 150 speeches were made about violations on human rights that were repeated millions of times by TV, radio, Internet and the printed press. Cuban Minister of Foreign Affairs Bruno Rodríguez, in his speech on March 1st before the Foreign Ministers meeting in Geneva, stated: "Human conscience rejects the deaths of innocent people in any circumstance and in any place. Cuba fully shares world concern for the losses in civilian lives in Libya and wishes that their people attain a peaceful and sovereign solution to the civil war happening over there, without any foreign interference, and ensuring the integrity of that nation." Some of the final paragraphs of his speech were noteworthy: "If essential human rights are a right of life, is the Council ready to suspend the membership of states that unleash war?" "Will it suspend states that finance and supply military aid used by the receiving state in massive, flagrant and systematic violations on human rights and in attacks on civilian populations, such as what is happening in Palestine?" "Will it apply that measure against powerful countries that carry out extra-judicial executions on the territory of other states, using high technology such as smart bombs and unmanned planes? "What would happen with states that accept on their territory illegal secret prisons, facilitate secret flights carrying kidnapped persons or participate in acts of torture?" We fully share the courageous position of the Bolivarian leader Hugo Chávez and ALBA. We are against the internal war in Libya, in favour of immediate peace and full respect for life and the rights of all citizens, with no foreign intervention that would only serve to prolong the conflict and NATO interests. Fidel Castro Ruz Bahrain: U.S. Backs Saudi Military Intervention,
|
Smoke emanates from the tent city in Pearl Square on March 16, 2011 after government forces, backed by foreign troops, cleared the square. Recent protests at the square brought out more than 100,000 or a fifth of Bahrain's population. |
Two weeks earlier Egypt's Al-Masry Al-Youm newspaper reported that the Saudi government had sent an estimated thirty tanks to Bahrain.
In the interim U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates visited Bahrain on March 11 and 12 and met with King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa and Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa. The first is Commander-in-Chief and the second Deputy Supreme Commander of the Bahrain Defence Force. The Bahraini monarch underwent military training with the British Army at the now-defunct Mons Officer Cadet School and later attended the United States Army Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, graduating in 1973.
The Pentagon chief and former Central Intelligence Agency director was in the company of men who spoke his language.
Gates commented approvingly of his hosts:
"I am convinced they both are serious about real reform. I think that the concern now is that it's important that they have somebody to talk to, and that the opposition be willing to sit down with the government and carry this process forward."[1]
He praised the king's and prince's "willingness to engage with the opposition," lauding their efforts as "a model for the entire region" -- the Middle East and North Africa. Bahrain lies directly across the Persian Gulf from Iran.
The Defense Secretary confirmed that there had been "much talk of Iran" between him and his royal interlocutors and added: "One of the issues under discussion with respect to Libya, obviously, is a no-fly zone.... If we are directed to impose a no-fly zone, we have the resources to do it."[2]
On March 7 the foreign ministers of the Gulf Cooperation
Council member states -- Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and
the United Arab Emirates - called for imposing a no-fly zone over
Libya, with Emirati Foreign Minister Sheik Abdullah bin Zayed al-Nahyan
emoting: "We appeal to
the international community, especially the Security Council, to meet
its historical responsibility to protect this dear people." A week
after the above display of unconvincing solicitude, leading members of
the organization sent troops to Bahrain to suppress protests against
the hereditary autocracy.
Last September the Financial Times reported that the U.S. had struck deals to provide four members of the Gulf Cooperation Council -- Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Oman - with $123 billion worth of arms in a dramatic move to confront Iran in the Persian Gulf. Saudi Arabia accounts for over half the total, $67 billion for 84 F-15 jets, 70 Apache gunships, 72 Black Hawk helicopters, 36 light helicopters and thousands of laser-guided smart bombs, the largest weapons deal in U.S. history. Even before those transactions are finalized, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute documented last December that Washington accounted for 54 percent of arms sales to Persian Gulf states between 2005 and 2009 and France 21 percent.
Gates flew home to Washington on March 12 from the Bahraini capital of Manama, ending a trip that started in Afghanistan five days before, after which he went to U.S. Africa Command headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany where he officiated over the transfer of command from General William Ward to General Carter Ham, and to NATO Headquarters in Brussels where he engaged in two days of meetings with his 27 fellow Alliance defense chiefs and those of another 20 nations providing troops for NATO's International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan.
Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell stated of U.S. relations with allies in the Middle East region: "All of the...deep strategic interests we have with them remain the same as they were six months ago."[3]
That Saudi military forces entered Bahrain two days
after Secretary Gates left would lead any sensible person to draw the
conclusion that the Pentagon chief had discussed more than Iran and
Libya with the kingdom's top two government and defense officials.
Though discussions on Iran would not
have been unrelated to those concerning a U.S.-backed deployment of
Saudi and other Gulf Cooperation Council forces to Bahrain, as some
70-75 percent of Bahrain's population is Shi'a Muslim by way of
confessional background although the ruling family is Sunni.
A Bahraini protester quoted by Reuters on March 15
commented on the Saudi-led military incursion this way: "It's part of a
regional plan and they're fighting on our (land). If the Americans were
men they would go and fight Iran directly but not in our country."
The U.S. Fifth Fleet, one of six used by Washington to patrol the world's seas and oceans, is headquartered near Manama, where between 4,000-6,000 American military personnel are stationed. Unlike Tunisia and Egypt, U.S. military partners but not hosts of American bases, Bahrain is vital to U.S. international military and energy strategy, and allowing a doctrinal affinity to in any manner augment Iran's influence in its Persian Gulf neighbor is anathema to the White House, State Department and Pentagon.
The Fifth Fleet's area of responsibility encompasses 2.5 million square miles of water, including the Persian Gulf, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Oman, the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean as far south as Kenya.[4] Aircraft carriers, destroyers and other warships are assigned to it on a rotational basis and the fleet is the naval component of U.S. Central Command, sharing a commander and headquarters in Bahrain with U.S. Naval Forces Central Command. Central Command's purview stretches from Egypt in the west to Kazakhstan, bordering Russia and China, in the east.
The Fifth Fleet has approximately 30,000 personnel
stationed across the region.
Demonstration outside Safriya Palace in Riffa, 20 km south of Manama where members of the royal family reside. Some 770 people were injured on March 11, 2011 when security forces and pro-government forces armed with swords and makeshift weapons attacked some 8,000 protestors heading towards the royal court, news agencies report. |
The geopolitical importance of Bahrain was demonstrated when the U.S.'s top military officer, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen, visited several nations in the Middle East and the Horn of Africa last month: Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Djibouti and Kuwait, with a last-minute stop in Bahrain not listed on his itinerary.
Mullen inspected the Combined Joint Task Force -- Horn of Africa at Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti, the first major American military base on the African continent, now assigned to U.S. Africa Command.
While in Saudi Arabia, he characterized Iran as "a country that continues to foment instability in the region and take advantage of every opportunity."
"There are always concerns in this region with Iran. Certainly the United States has them, as well as all the regional players. Certainly that was part of the discussion today [February 21] with the Saudis."[5] A discussion that was held with Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, Deputy Interior Minister; Prince Miteb bin Abdullah, commander of the National Guard; Prince Khalid bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud, Assistant Minister for Defense and Aviation; and Lieutenant General Husein Abdullah al-Qubail, Deputy Chief of the General Staff.
Mullen was cited as saying the talks "focused largely on the tumult in Bahrain," with him stating:
"Obviously the Saudis, in particular -- but everybody in the region - is watching what's happening in Bahrain very closely."[6]
In Bahrain on February 25 he "reaffirmed our strong commitment to our military relationship with the Bahraini defense forces," according to his spokesman. He also commended the Bahraini royal family "for the very measured way they have been handling the popular crisis here," although several hundred protesters have now been killed and wounded, and praised the government for the "giant leaps" it has taken in recent years.[7]
Mullen visited the Marine Corps Forces Central Command [MARFORCENT] Forward element at the Naval Support Activity Bahrain base, home to U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and the U.S. Fifth Fleet. The new Marine headquarters "stood up in November to bring Marine Corps Forces Central Command what its other sister services already have: a forward element within the 20-nation Centcom area of operations."
"Exactly how many Marines ultimately will join the element is classified, but...developments underway" are seen "as a sign of MARFORCENT's long-term commitment to strengthening partnerships and protecting U.S. interests in the region."[8]
Ten days earlier North Atlantic Treaty Organization Deputy Secretary General Claudio Bisogniero addressed a conference in Qatar (immediately southeast of Bahrain), the fourth Ambassadorial Conference of NATO's Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, also attended by Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen. Concerns expressed in Bisogniero's keynote address were capsulized by a local newspaper as follows:
"Gulf nations are crucial to world energy supplies and their security supplies are also important....Since 50 percent of world energy supplies transit through the Gulf region, it is Nato's main concern to ensure these supplies."[9]
The Istanbul Cooperation Initiative was created at the NATO summit in Turkey in 2004 to complement the upgrading of the Mediterranean Dialogue partnership with Israel, Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria, Jordan, Mauritania and Morocco to the level of the Partnership for Peace program that graduated twelve Eastern European candidates to full NATO membership from 1999-2009, an unprecedented seven at the Istanbul summit seven years ago, with new bilateral partnerships with Gulf Cooperation Council members Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
In NATO's words at the time: "NATO leaders decided to elevate the Alliance's Mediterranean Dialogue to a genuine partnership and to launch the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative with selected countries in the broader region of the Middle East."[10]
Last month NATO's second top civilian leader "welcomed Istanbul Cooperation Initiative (ICI) partners Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, showing his interest in deepening energy security and cooperation in the Gulf region also with Oman and Saudi Arabia."[11]
In 2008 a NATO-Bahrain Public Diplomacy Conference was held in Manama. "The Conference brought together the Secretary General of NATO, the North Atlantic Council, the Deputy Secretary General of NATO, the Chairman of the NATO Military Committee and NATO officials, with government representatives, academics and senior scholars from countries in the Gulf region invited in the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative."[12]
The groundwork has been laid for U.S. and allied
military intervention in the Persian Gulf.[13]
The day after Saudi and Emirati military forces arrived in Bahrain, several thousand protesters descended on the Saudi embassy to demonstrate their opposition to the intervention. As the Reuters news agency reported, "Bahrainis are concerned that their tiny island could become a proxy battleground for a wider stand-off between the Sunni-ruled Gulf Arab countries, all U.S. allies, and Shi'ite-ruled Iran, a U.S. foe."
The Iranian Foreign Ministry referred to the foreign military deployment in Bahrain as "unacceptable" and the Bahraini king recalled his ambassador from Tehran in response.
Two years ago Saudi Arabia engaged in its true first war, that against Houthi militias in northern Yemen. On December 14 of 2009 BBC News reported that 70 Yemeni civilians had been killed in a Saudi bombing raid on the village of Bani Maan. Houthi sources on the same day claimed that "U.S. fighter jets have attacked Yemen's Sa'ada Province" and "U.S. fighter jets have launched 28 attacks on the northwestern province of Sa'ada."[14]
The U.S. is no less complicit in the Saudi military
intervention currently underway in Bahrain. Pentagon spokesman Colonel
David Lapan stated the U.S. had been "informed" of but not "consulted"
on the Saudi deployment, but his verbal sleight of hand was solely
intended to cozen the uninformed
and unwary given the recent visits to Bahrain by the head of the
Pentagon and America's top military commander, who decidedly were not
there to discuss the weather.
1. U.S. Department of Defense, March 12, 2011
2. Ibid
3. Ibid
4. Arabian Sea: Center Of West's 21st Century War, Stop
NATO, October 25, 2010
5. U.S. Department of Defense, February 21, 2011
6. Ibid
7. Joint Chiefs of Staff, February 25, 2011
8. Marine Forward Element Set Up to Help in Middle East,
U.S. Department of Defense, February 25, 2011
9. The Peninsula, February 16, 2011
10. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, June 29, 2004
11. Ibid
12. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, April 28, 2008
13. NATO's Role In The Military Encirclement Of Iran,
Stop NATO, February 10, 2010
14. Yemen: Pentagon's War On The Arabian Peninsula, Stop
NATO, December 15, 2009
The Egyptian people continue to press their demands in Tahrir Square, March 11, 2011. The January 25 Youth coalition on March 15, 2011, refused an offer to meet with visiting U.S. Secretary of Statet Hillary Clinton saying it did not welcome her visit and condemned US. policies in support of Mubarak's dictatorship. They stated that "the Egyptian people are the masters of their own land and destiny and will only accept equal relations of friendship and respect between the people of Egypt and the United States." |
On February 24, a 19-year state of emergency was lifted in Algeria, following unprecedented protests. Ending the emergency powers was one of the demands of opposition groups which have been staging weekly protests for poltiical and social change in defiance of the emergency laws. Recent protests in the capital Algiers -- top: protest against housing problems, March 16, 2011; bottom left: demonstration of engineering students February 21, 2011; bottom right: pharmacists' protest, February 23, 2011. |
Acting Prime Minister of Tunisia Mohamed Ghannouchi resigned on February 27, 2011 amid mass protests. Ghannouchi announced his decision in an unscheduled television appearance, despite prior declarations that he would remain in office until general elections, which are scheduled to be held in four months. Right: protest against the visit of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, March 16, 2011. Left: mass protest in Tunis, February 25, 2011. |
In recent weeks, thousands of people across the country have taken to the streets to demand social and economic reforms, better public services and to protest unemployment, a sharp rise in food prices and corruption. Left: Baghdad, March 12, 2011; right: February 25, 2011. Some 4,000 protesters, angry over corruption and rising unemployment, took to the streets of Iraq's semi-autonomous northern Kurdish zone on March 12, 2011 to demand the ouster of the Kurdistan Regional Government of President Massoud Barzani. |
The Gaza Strip, March 16, 2011, after an Israeli airstrike. Since the end of Operation Cast Lead in January 2009, Israeli forces have continued to commit war crimes against Gaza by carrying out large numbers of ground and air attacks (including targeted assassinations by unmanned drones) , killing civilians and damaging property, news agencies report. |
Website: www.cpcml.ca Email: editor@cpcml.ca