Serious Concerns About
Quebec Government's Bill 59

Simon Lévesque is the Head of Health and Safety for the Quebec Federation of Labour-Construction (FTQ-Construction).

A big concern right now is with the Quebec government's Bill 59 on the occupational health and safety regime.

We are very far away from an agreement between employers and workers about this bill, which supposedly has to do with the modernization of the regime, when essentially it's about managing losses. Employers want to save money through the regime by penalizing workers.

They do not want to make commitments to prevention at the workplace.

They want to save money on the treatment and rehabilitation of workers' injuries and on compensation, for example by setting the number of treatments allowed for an injury. The bill places limits on treatment and hands the authority for the recognition of occupational diseases over to regulatory committees, which requires an agreement between the employer, the union and the Labour Standards, Pay Equity and Workplace Health and Safety Board (CNESST). We know from experience that it takes so long to get a regulation that I don't see how we could agree to have occupational diseases recognized by regulatory committees.

We are in a context of labour scarcity, with employers trying to fill positions quickly by reducing training, by not worrying about occupational health and safety. If, within such a context, jobs do not include adequate working conditions and prevention mechanisms that protect the health and physical integrity of workers, then when is this going to happen? It would take a big change for this to happen and we know that the governments in power are not pro-worker.

Employers are making the same economic arguments as in the early 1900s, that health and safety is expensive, that it will kill the economy, etc. The human factor is not important to them. Everything is reduced to an issue of money. They talk about reducing costs by reducing prevention. In fact, it's through prevention that costs will be reduced. The human cost is huge and the economy and society as a whole suffer when a person can no longer function, go out, afford anything, provide for his or her children.

For employers to say they want to keep their management rights is absurd. They'll keep their stewardship rights by saying that something is good for workers even when they know it's not. Bill 59 gives them what they want, at the expense of the health and safety of workers.

We cannot agree with that.

(Translated from original French by Workers' Forum. Photos: CSN, CSD)


This article was published in

September 22, 2021 -  No. 86

Article Link:
https://cpcml.ca/WF2021/Articles/WO08864.HTM


    

Website:  www.cpcml.ca   Email:  editor@cpcml.ca