Education
What Teachers and Education Workers Are Learning Through the Pandemic
- Laura Chesnik -
Laura Chesnik is an elementary teacher in
Ontario and a host of the Education
is a Right Podcast.
A major focus of our work since last May Day
has been to lift the
pressure on our peers that our role in this
pandemic is to be good
critics of the government. We need to find ways
to put in place
solutions by discussing what we are all facing
and how we can make a
difference.
In Ontario the
first issue we faced after the initial shutdown
in March 2020 was
how to affirm our right to safe working
conditions when we know the
virus is spreading in our communities and it
will come into our schools
if we are not very vigilant. On the podcast
Education Is a Right we
began taking up this discussion directly in
terms of how it
poses itself in education: what it means to
refuse unsafe work, how to
refuse, and what happens when one does. For
educators, the right to
refuse is a bit different than in other sectors;
we have exceptions as
we come under the Education Act and we have a
"duty of care" for our
students, which means we must ensure they are
supervised before we
engage in a work refusal. So this created
hesitation, that somehow we
could not refuse. It also created the sense that
by refusing we would
be giving up our duty of care for our students.
There is also the
pressure that the Occupational Health and Safety Act
does not allow you
to refuse based on a general fear or concern; it
has to be based on a
specific concern that you personally have, that
will directly affect
you. It is as if you have to be able to prove
the virus is in your air
before you can legitimately refuse under these
existing arrangements.
So this too imposed the pressure that it is not
possible or worth it to
say No to try and bring in proper safety
measures.
Early on in the school year, the Ministry of
Labour kept dismissing
things, claiming that without proof of the virus
in the school itself,
you do not have a valid reason to refuse.
Refusals were transformed
into what are called "complaints." Complaints
were registered and
recorded but we saw this was done using form
letters that did not even
accurately document the actual complaint. For
example, despite all the
knowledge that the virus spreads via aerosols,
it stated right on the
form letter that there is no evidence the virus
spreads in the air
through ventilation systems. The government's
claims of no proof of the
virus spreading in schools comes alongside its
refusal to do mass
testing
in the workplaces to even know if COVID-19 is in
the schools and find
out how it is traveling.
We
can see that the existing arrangements for
health and safety which put
everything on the individual -- either the
worker or the supervisor --
do not protect us unless we have organization.
They are meant to keep
everyone isolated, making it a "choice" whether
to uphold your rights
or not. In fact, it is through working things
out together that
we can see that it is a social responsibility to
refuse unsafe work and
to make it safe. Yet, the whole system is set up
to say that you as an
individual have to have a legitimate fear for
your own personal health
and safety and cannot do a refusal "for others."
It is aimed at
preventing a collective expression of NO
to conditions that are unsafe
by reducing everyone to their own island, making
their own choice. But,
as people take stands it necessarily becomes an
issue for everyone, so
taking a stand is the starting point.
We have seen that while it may seem impossible
at first to even
consider how to empower oneself under these
circumstances, there is
always a way forward, you just have to keep
talking about it, arguing
it out and seeing what is possible.
So we began discussing openly how this issue of
refusing posed
itself, what it means to refuse, and that it is
not an issue of
refusing work per
se, or just going through the motions.
It is refusing
to go along with something that is unacceptable
and trying to find
alternatives by affirming our right to
conscience and freedom of speech.
We informed ourselves and our audience of the
experiences of those
who took a stand across the province and we also
had our own
experiences with this whole process. We realized
that, in fact, a
refusal and even a threat of a refusal does a
lot. For example, it
brings the conditions to the attention of
parents, other staff and the
administration.
It does not permit things to continue unspoken.
And it reveals the
absurdity of the situation in which there are
outbreaks in the schools
but the Ministry of Labour inspectors say there
is no evidence of the
virus in the schools and the Minister of
Education insists schools are
not a source of transmission.
The issue we are taking up now is that it is
not a choice whether to
go along with unsafe conditions or not. It is a
duty to not accept
conditions that are unsafe and we should take up
this duty without
hesitation for ourselves, our colleagues, our
students and the society
as a whole.
Teachers
and education workers in different parts of the
province have started
now taking stands collectively in their
workplaces to refuse to go in
if it is not safe to do so and if measures are
not taken to make them
safe. Some took the decision to refuse as a
group, others took the
decision to raise concerns and threaten a
refusal if their
concerns were not addressed. These actions
resulted in changes being
made in the workplaces, including the
establishment of committees for
reviewing safety that are not official but have
been set up to allow
workers to have their say about what is needed.
In many cases
administrators and parents have been very
supportive, in fact even
thanking
people for doing work refusals or threatening a
refusal.
The stands taken by doctors, nurses, scientists
and other
professionals with relevant expertise who are
speaking out, calling for
changes to make schools safer, to have mass
testing, smaller class
sizes, improved ventilation, or to close schools
and provide the
necessary supports for families has also made a
difference. It has
given teachers and
education workers a lot more confidence that we
are not alone in being
concerned, that medical and scientific
professionals are taking up
their duty too. It is one fight.
Our experience is showing that by putting the
problems on the agenda
for everyone and having a way to inform one
another, nothing is
impossible. The work of the Workers' Centre to
do this nationally is
very important. We can see from our own
experience and the experience
of others across the country that solutions can
be found, but it
starts by taking a stand to not accept what is
unacceptable.
This article was published in
May 10, 2021 - No 42
Article Link:
https://cpcml.ca/WF2021/Articles/WO08421.HTM
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|