Most Ride-Hailing and Delivery Workers in San Francisco Not Eligible to Vote

Rideshare Drivers United reports that many workers in their sector are not officially considered eligible voters in California. They would not have been able to vote on Proposition 22 even though it directly affects their lives as it contains an imposed collective agreement detailing certain terms of their employment.

The following executive summary is from a recent study of ride-hailing and delivery workers in San Francisco.

On-Demand and On-the-Edge: Ride Hailing and
Delivery Workers in San Francisco,
Chris Benner, PhD, October 8, 2020

Executive Summary

The coronavirus crisis has made visible a range of essential workers -- grocery store workers, cleaning staff, home health aides and others -- who in normal times are often ignored or taken for granted. One category of these essential workers that has gained particular attention in this moment are on-demand meal and grocery delivery workers. Working for well-known companies like DoorDash, GrubHub and Instacart, these workers are delivering essential food and other supplies to people staying at home in the midst of the shelter-in-place orders. The jump in demand for these services highlights how important these on-demand services are in the midst of our collective efforts to maintain physical distancing to limit the spread of COVID-19.

Yet these on-demand food delivery workers, along with on-demand ride-hailing workers who fill a similar role in providing transportation services to other essential workers right now, are tremendously vulnerable. In providing these services, both before and during the shelter-in-place orders, they are vulnerable both to contracting and spreading the coronavirus. Their health vulnerability underscores their financial vulnerability, as prior to the virus outbreak, they were already struggling to make ends meet. Being classified by the on-demand platform companies as independent contractors, they are also particularly susceptible to not having health insurance, paid sick leave, or access to unemployment benefits.

In May, we released the results of a unique, in-person representative survey of ride-hailing and food delivery workers that we conducted and then suspended when the pandemic hit, as well as a follow-up online survey. The central findings were simple and clear -- for a large portion of this workforce, despite this being full-time work, they were financially vulnerable before the outbreak, and the crisis is pushing many of them to the brink.

Now we have new data from a second in-person representative survey we conducted in July and August, focusing on food and grocery delivery workers from three apps: DoorDash (114 surveys completed), Instacart (114) and Amazon Fresh (39).

One note about methodology. Both surveys were designed to be representative samples of on-demand work being done in the city, not of all on-demand workers. This is important.

Representative samples of all people who do some work for on-demand app companies show many people working for short periods of time, or earning only a small portion of their earnings from this type of work. But we developed two representative samples based on the actual work being done in the city, which we believe is a better basis for understanding labour practices and developing labour market policy. Our understanding is that this is the first study of its kind done anywhere in the United States at this scale.

The key findings emerging from the new summer survey focused on DoorDash, Instacart and Amazon Fresh include the following:

Highly Diverse Workforce

As with the winter survey, we found that this workforce is highly racially and ethnically diverse:

- 76 per cent of those surveyed are people of colour, and 39 per cent immigrants.

- Women and non-gender binary people perform 39 per cent of the food and grocery delivery work, including a slight majority of Instacart work. Our survey of ride-hailing workers was much more male-dominated.

Financially Struggling

All three surveys we've conducted of this workforce continue to reveal how they are struggling to make ends meet. According to the latest survey:

- One-quarter of this workforce is reliant on some form of public assistance, including 35 per cent of Amazon Fresh and 33 per cent of DoorDash workers. This public assistance includes Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), food stamps, housing vouchers, Supplemental Security Income or the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC).

- One-fifth of these food and grocery delivery workers are on food stamps.

- 14 per cent do not have health insurance.

Not a Gig for Most People

As with our winter survey, our latest survey continues to reveal that app-based delivery work is largely being performed by full time workers.

- 71 per cent obtain at least three-quarters of their monthly income from platform work, and 57 per cent rely entirely on platform work for their monthly income.

- Workers averaged 32 hours per week working for all the apps, and 30 hours per week for the app they were surveyed on. Instacart workers were more likely to work longer hours.

- Nearly one-third are supporting children through their platform work.

- While there was more longevity among ride-hailing and food delivery workers prior to COVID, our latest survey found that 70 per cent of food and grocery delivery workers have worked on the apps for less than six months.

Earnings from App-Based Work Are Low

Our latest survey continues to find that after expenses, earnings from app-based delivery work are very low.

- While workers average $450 from this work, after adjusting for mileage expenses, they average only $270 per week.

- Instacart workers had the highest average weekly earnings of the apps surveyed ($500); yet after expenses, those earnings dropped below the other apps to just $235 per week.

- Nearly one third of workers' time spent performing food and grocery delivery work is unpaid time (e.g. driving to the pick-up location, waiting for orders).

- 18 per cent of DoorDash workers earned an estimated $0 after deducting mileage expenses (calculated using Internal Revenue Service mileage reimbursement rate of $.575 cents per mile and the survey respondents' estimated weekly mileage).

Platform Companies Structure Job Opportunities

Some of the survey findings point to platforms managing job opportunities in ways that would likely support claims that these workers are employees under the "ABC" test codified in California Assembly Bill 5.

- When workers decline certain job offers, 56 per cent are not offered work for a period of time, including 60 per cent from Amazon Fresh, 63 per cent of DoorDash, and 51 per cent of Instacart.

- 25 per cent of DoorDash workers were offered fewer bonuses and incentives after declining work.

- 17 per cent of workers were threatened with deactivation by those apps.

Bicycle Delivery a Popular but Dangerous Mode of Travel

- More than a quarter of this workforce uses a bicycle as their primary mode of travel for deliveries.

- 70 per cent feel unsafe delivering food this way, and almost one-third stated that they had felt physically threatened while delivering food on a bike.

Summary and Policy Implications of Combined Results from Winter and Summer 2020 Surveys

- On-demand ride-hailing and delivery work in San Francisco is performed predominantly by people for whom it is close to full-time work and their primary source of income.

- This is a highly diverse workforce, with majority people of colour and a significant immigrant population. Women also comprise a large percentage of food and grocery delivery workers.

- This workforce struggles to make ends meet, and their circumstances have been made significantly worse by the COVID-19 crisis.

- When expenses and both unpaid and paid work time are fully accounted for, a substantial portion of this workforce are estimated to make less than the equivalent of San Francisco's minimum wage (currently $15.59 hour).

- Many also don't receive other benefits they would be entitled to under San Francisco law if the companies were classifying them as employees.

- Many are also not currently being adequately supported during the COVID-19 crisis, either by the app-based companies they work for, or by public policies.

- These findings underscore the importance of policy makers ensuring that existing city and state employment laws are enforced for this workforce, and finding new ways to address the economic, safety and health, and public health concerns facing this critical workforce.

Download the full survey results here

Download October 2020 Supplemental Survey of Delivery Drivers here

To read the UC Santa Cruz News Press Release, click here.


This article was published in

Number 82 - December 3, 2020

Article Link:
Most Ride-Hailing and Delivery Workers in San Francisco Not Eligible to Vote


    

Website:  www.cpcml.ca   Email:  editor@cpcml.ca