Regressive Features of Bill 61
Through Bill 61 -- An Act to restart Quebec's
economy and to mitigate the consequences of the public health emergency
declared on 13 March 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the
Legault government seeks executive power for another two years to
violate and override existing law in order to fast-track the
construction of
202, and possibly more, public infrastructure projects such as schools,
seniors' residences, road work and public transit. The bill contains
regressive features that many have denounced as arbitrary such as the
continuing power to deprive public sector workers of their right to
working conditions acceptable to themselves within negotiated
collective
agreements.
Violates Environment Quality Act
Article 15 of the bill states that the government may through executive dictate declare that provisions of the Environment Quality Act will
not apply to certain projects. Bill 61 gives the government executive
the power to single out projects to be sped up and prescribed with
provisions replacing those in the existing Environment
Quality Act.
With this power, government executive regulations become law according
to whatever the authority wants. This means the government can
arbitrarily according to its whim, and possibly to accommodate powerful
private interests, override and violate legal provisions in the Environment Quality Act.
Violates Expropriation Act
In cases of expropriation of the property of individuals
to make way for economic projects, executive authority under Bill 61
can declare illegal any legal challenge of the expropriating party's
right to expropriate under the Expropriation Act. The government says this arbitrary power to deny rights in violation of existing law is
needed under the pragmatic hoax of speeding up economic projects.
Violates Act Respecting Contracting by Public Bodies
Regarding the awarding of public contracts, the bill
says that the government may by regulation or on the recommendation of
the Treasury Board determine as acceptable certain actions that are in
fact in contradiction with the Act Respecting Contracting by Public Bodies.
This could mean the elimination of public calls for tenders thus
facilitating the awarding of contracts to specific monopolies according
to executive fiat. This arbitrary executive power is not new per se as
it already exists and has been used. What is new is that the bill would
now enshrine this arbitrary executive power in law declaring it above
any existing regulations.
This provision in the bill has already caused an uproar
as it revives and brings to the fore the memory in Quebec of open ugly
corruption in the awarding of public contracts to private interests in
return for financing of certain political parties. The uproar has
forced the government at this point to declare that the power to
restrict public calls
for tenders will apply only to those projects involving municipal
bodies.
Extends Public Health Emergency Indefinitely
Among other things, the declaration of a public health
emergency on March 13 gave power to the government executive to cancel
negotiated collective agreements with health care and social service
workers in order to unilaterally change their working conditions. This
attack on workers' rights has been loudly condemned.
Bill 61 introduces a clause to extend indefinitely the
public health emergency and its anti-worker powers. In effect, the
indefinite extension of the emergency measures contradicts the Public Health Act
under which the public health emergency was declared. The legal measure
in the Act says that a public health emergency is effective
for a maximum period of 10 days. The government must then renew the
emergency and renew it again every 10 days for as long as it deems
necessary or for 30 days with the consent of the National Assembly. A
government proposed amendment to Bill 61 says the emergency and its
arbitrary attacks on public sector workers will continue until
October 2020 and longer if necessary.
Provides Government with Immunity from Prosecution
As was the case with the declaration of a public health
emergency and the powers that it gives, the bill is framed to provide
total immunity for the government executive. The preamble of the bill
explicitly says, "Immunity from prosecution is granted to the
Government, a minister, a public body or any other person who performs
an act in good
faith in exercising powers introduced by this bill or implementing
measures taken under those powers."
This creates a very dangerous situation for the people
and Quebec society. The pandemic and declaration of a health emergency
and now the reopening of the economy are being used to further
concentrate political power in fewer hands, which are subordinate to
narrow private interests. For example, with this bill the government
may decide
that safety training and standards in construction are regulations
hindering the mitigation of the consequences of the pandemic and the
reopening of the economy. This argument has already been used in the
construction and other sectors, eroding health and safety standards and
putting workers and the broad public at great risk. Enshrining these
regressive practices in law and providing those enforcing them with
immunity are cause for serious concern.
This article was published in
Number 47 - July 7, 2020
Article Link:
Regressive Features of Bill 61
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|