Government Seeks to Eliminate Teachers' Role in Decision-Making
Bill 40 expresses the determination of
successive governments to deny Quebec teachers
any role in the establishment of new
arrangements for governance in education even
though teachers are those who have the expertise
in the education of Quebec students and
first-hand knowledge of the problems that need
to be resolved.
Bill 40 directly interferes with teachers'
working conditions without their consent and
without negotiations. In particular, it imposes
continuing training for teachers and requires
that the school director ensure "all teachers
fulfill their continuing education obligation."
The bill imposes unilaterally a new condition
that teachers are expected to fulfill while
those same teachers are right in the midst of
negotiations for a new collective agreement.
The
Autonomous Teachers' Federation (FAE), which is
very active in opposition to Bill 40, says that
all terms of employment must be negotiated. In
this regard, the FAE is considering filing a
legal challenge on the grounds that the
unilateral imposition of terms of employment is
unconstitutional. Terms of employment should be
the subject of negotiations under the Act
respecting collective bargaining in the sectors
of education, social affairs and government
agencies.
Bill 40 pursues the denial of the rights of
teachers to make decisions about the performance
of their duties. The government is giving itself
the right to decide according to its own agenda
and to impose its decisions on teachers without
their consent and even if they are opposed.
Teachers also condemn the attacks on their
dignity and the integrity of their work that
Bill 40 represents. For example, one of the new
powers of the Minister of Education is to "more
easily obtain students' results on the
examinations that the Minister imposes at the
elementary and secondary levels, and communicate
with school service centre employees and parents
in the school network."
The bill intensifies the pressure that is
already being exerted on teachers. The law
allows a school director in the name of academic
success to modify students' results albeit in
"consultation" with teachers. This perverts the
evaluation of learning and the progress of
students, and infringes upon the professional
judgment of teachers and the quality of
education, which cannot be reduced to exam
results. The law also creates a
"commitment-to-student-success committee" whose
mandate is to examine the results of the
students and "to promote, among the institutions
of the school service centre, educational
practices, including evaluation practices, that
are based on research."
According to this legislation, the performance
of an individual teacher, and by extension the
academic success of the students, is to be
measured by the teacher's adoption of behaviours
and practices that are prescribed by the
government. This sidelines the collective
working conditions of the teachers, for example
class sizes, and the educator's training,
experience and outlook in both teaching and the
evaluation of students progress and what is
needed to improve education generally.
Teachers have been asking for over 15 years
that class sizes be reduced so that they can
work with and guide young people through their
learning process. The government has steadily
rejected all such demands for collective
improvements in the conditions, and claims
instead that the success of students depends on
a teacher adopting the right behaviour and
approach.
This bill denies the rich experience and
accumulated knowledge of teachers, which is
reflected in their claims such as the importance
of class size and the importance of having
trained people in the class room to assist those
with special needs and to have knowledgeable
librarians and others capable of guiding
students in their learning and research.
The bill imposes conditions that are said to
emanate from studies but teachers played no role
in that research and were not even approached
for their views, both individually and
collectively. The results of the supposed
research have nothing to with the direct
experience of teachers and in fact contradict
their experience and thought material on
education and the needs of their students.
Teachers, who are directly responsible for the
education of the youth, are demanding respect
with regard to the pedagogical approach society
and the government adopt towards the youth and
the direction of education generally.
This article was published in
Number 10 - March 5, 2020
Article Link:
Government Seeks to Eliminate Teachers' Role in Decision-Making
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|