September 12, 2020
- No. 34
Appropriate
Demand for Upcoming Speech from The Throne
Stop
Paying the Rich;
Increase Investments in Social Programs!
![](../images2020/WorkersEconomy/Slogans/170910-RallyAgainstCriminalizingMIgrantWorkers-Leamington_49cr5.JPG) ![](../images2020/WorkersEconomy/Slogans/190501-EdmontonMayDay-SPR-01cr.jpg) ![](../images2020/WorkersEconomy/Slogans/160501-TorontoMayDay-08cr.JPG)
What to Expect
• Pay-the-Rich
Schemes
by Borrowing Money
from Private Sources
• Increased
Government
Debt
•
Who Pays for Public
Infrastructure
• The
Issue of Public Revenue
•
The Need for Modern
Definitions
Discussion of the
Pay-the-Rich Economy
and How to Overcome It
• The
Aim of the Working Class Movement
• Objective
Conditions
of Paying the Rich
• The
Trend of a Falling Rate of Profit
• A
New Direction for the Economy
Anniversary of Attack on
Twin Towers
and Coup d'État in Chile
•
Justice for the Chilean
People!
- Dougal MacDonald -
• Catastrophic
Consequences of U.S.
Imperialists'
Wars of Aggression
- Nick Lin -
United States
• The
Fight of U.S. Postal Workers to
Oppose Privatization and Debunk Self-Serving
Anti-Worker Myths in
Lead-Up to U.S. Election
•
Government-Created Funding
Crisis
• Postal
Service
Is Committed to Public Service,
Not Commercial
Profits
-
National Association of Letter Carriers -
• Postal
Days
of Action
Made in Cuba
• Soberana
-- Cuba's COVID-19 Vaccine
- Gerardo Szalkowicz -
Venezuela
• Elections
for
National Assembly Underway
Colombia
• People
Take
Action in Defence of Their Rights and
Against State
Terror
Chile
• National
Plebiscite
on New Constitution
Bolivia
• October
18
General Election
Ecuador
• Former
President
Correa Unjustly Blocked from
Candidacy for Vice
President
SUPPLEMENT
Discussion
on the Economy
• Modern
Monetary Theory: Keynesianism
Warmed Over
-
K.C. Adams -
Appropriate
Demand for Upcoming Speech from The Throne
A new Throne Speech will be delivered on
September 23 as
federal and provincial governments "reopen" the
economy after strict
COVID-19 shutdowns. They are guided by a "business
as usual"
pay-the-rich approach despite the fact that the
large number of
COVID-19 deaths and the damage done to the economy
is the result of
this "business as usual" approach. The more it
goes, the more schemes
are unfurled to step up paying the rich in the
name of achieving
prosperity. The approach denies the most important
element required to
activate the human factor/social consciousness
which is to recognize
the polity and take up social responsibilities and
duties to it and its
members.
The time is now to demand governments stop
paying the rich and increase investments in public
social programs and
public services built and owned through public
enterprise with the
working people in control. This is the challenge
the working people
face at this time.
The modern economy of industrial
mass production is more than capable of providing
enough public revenue
to meet the needs of society and its members. The
dominant social force
in control of the economy and state obstructs the
new value workers
produce from meeting the needs of the people and
society. The way
forward is opened to the extent the workers are
able to put the social
wealth they are producing under their control so
that it serves the
people.
The control of the financial oligarchy and
their oligopolies over the state's decision-making
power hands over the
productive forces to the rich and diverts the
social wealth into the
hands of narrowest private interests. This drags
the people into the
adventures of the oligarchs for domination over
all others, no matter
where they be.
For workers to take control and
provide a new direction for the economy is
feasible and necessary. They
have shown once again during the COVID-19 pandemic
that they are the
essential factor of production and of society
maintaining itself at all
times, including times of crisis. The situation
reveals that through
their deeds, thinking and concerns, this feature
of being essential can
lead to a new direction that looks after the well
being of all and
provides the rights of all with a guarantee by
making sure
decision-making is in their hands, not those who
represent narrow
private interests.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
What to
Expect
Reports say another $100
billion will be added to the deficit in the Throne
Speech, which is
already approaching $400 billion. If this is the
case, then the $500
billion deficit will be nearly 25 per cent of
Canada's GDP. This amount
is borrowed by the Government of Canada from
private lenders of the
financial oligarchy. It further concentrates
wealth, power and control
in fewer hands.
This is a feature of state
imperialism, that the financial oligarchy, the
state and its agencies,
including governments, defend and extend into
every cell of the economy
and society, the power, wealth and control of the
oligopolies.
The federal,
Quebec, provincial
and territorial governments collectively owed the
global financial
oligarchy around $1.3 trillion prior to the
pandemic. This amount has
risen dramatically with public borrowing from
private lenders during
the present crisis. The question has to be posed
forcefully: Why do
governments borrow from private lenders?
Much of
the borrowed money is channeled back to the
private lenders in interest
and guaranteed payments as well as bailouts to
their companies and in
big government funded infrastructure
projects, many of which
are public-private partnerships, in almost every
sector, such as the
service sectors of education and health care, and
the various levels of
the police and military.
Public health care is
nowadays inextricably linked to making sure the
financial oligarchy
profits from much of the sector through selling
pharmaceuticals and
supplying, at a hefty price, whatever material
hospitals require to
function, including the buildings.
The question should be
posed: if the oligarchs have all this available cash
to lend to
governments, why do they need bailouts and why do
they not invest the
money they control directly into their own or other
businesses and the
economy?
![Haut de page](top.gif)
Government debt is mostly held by the private
institutions of
the financial oligarchy. In lending money to
governments, the dominant
oligarchs of the ruling elite benefit in several
ways.
The
rich can park their money in a safe haven for a
short or long term and
even receive interest for doing so. This is
particularly important for
the rich during crises such as the current
COVID-19 pandemic when other
investments are risky or they have pulled money
out of the stock market
and have excess cash on hand.
The government in
turn provides bailouts and buys company paper
securities that are not
saleable at a particular time to private buyers
because of the risk
involved. The oligarchs have it numerous ways!
This is the
public-private partnership in action to serve the
rich.
The government
receives money from this private borrowing that it
then uses in
pay-the-rich schemes as handouts to the financial
oligarchy and its
businesses. Examples are the handouts to large
corporations during the
pandemic or the federal government's $4.5 billion
buyout of the Trans
Mountain pipeline and the Alberta government's $7
billion injection of
funds into the Keystone XL pipeline project.
Neither of those projects
could raise private investment funds. Government
money is routinely
used to finance large infrastructure projects in
which the biggest
private construction and management companies
participate and gain
guaranteed profits.
The existence of government
debts is used for propaganda purposes to reduce
spending in social
programs that directly benefit the people.
Governments and their
mouthpieces in the media screamed that they needed
$60 billion yearly
to service the public debt held by the financial
oligarchy, which
constrains and even contracts spending in social
programs. It is a
self-serving farce for which the people are made
to pay because the
decision-making power is not in their hands.
The
necessity to borrow from private interests is
presented as the only
alternative for governments to raise money as the
financial oligarchy
considers taxation of the value its workers
produce within its private
business interests as detrimental to the economy.
A compliant media it
controls do widespread propaganda for this
regressive view.
The first demand for the workers to put forward
is Stop Paying
the Rich; Increase Funding for Social Programs!
![Haut de page](top.gif)
The financial oligarchy refuses to
pay for the public infrastructure it uses that
benefit its business
activities, such as public highways, bridges,
public education and
health care and mass transit, amongst others
including research and
development. The building of the infrastructure
makes huge profits for
big business while much of the payment for these
necessary investments
in a modern economy falls to the public purse
without revenue returning
to the governments from the economic activity they
engender and the
value they produce.
The issue is never broached by
the rulers or their media and education system
that government debt to
private interests is completely unnecessary,
wasteful and harmful. The
state could borrow from itself and repay the debt
from the added-value
workers create in an expanding and stable economy.
If
the government used the money borrowed from itself
to invest in public
enterprise then the increased value and income
from those enterprises
would quickly repay the debt and more, making the
increased value
available for investments in social programs as
well as providing
stable employment for workers.
Governments usurped
by the oligopolies use the public revenue they
have collected to pay
the rich to build, maintain and manage all manner
of public
infrastructure including public roads, bridges,
mass transit, housing,
hospitals, educational institutions etc.
Once public
infrastructure is built and up and running, the
private enterprises of
the imperialist oligarchy refuse to realize (pay
for) the full amount
of the infrastructure they consume in the course
of operating their
businesses. A problem posed for the people to
resolve is to ensure that
when public or private enterprises consume public
infrastructure during
the course of their business as means of
production, the amount
consumed and transferred into the value of their
production must be
realized and accounted for in a transparent,
complete and direct manner.
Public infrastructure must be seen in their true
form as
public means of production essential for all
economic sectors and
enterprises, and not as articles of consumption
for which individuals
must pay.
Private conglomerates nowadays operate as
global cartels and coalitions which maraud with
impunity to control the
socialized economies and seize whatever benefits
they deem fit in the
moment. Those who control the cartels and
coalitions have the aim to
seize maximum profits under all conditions and
circumstances. Anyone
who claims they can be moderate or socially
responsible is in denial
for their own self-serving interests.
The striving
of the cartels and coalitions is to control the
productive forces. If
they fail to control them, then they destroy them.
The cut-throat
competition over control clashes inexorably with
the striving of the
working people to mobilize the modern
interconnected economy and all
its parts to meet their needs and organize it to
function seamlessly
and collectively without crises.
The problem posed
for the working class is to begin by declaring
that there is an
alternative to the present crisis-ridden and
destructive policy which
pays the rich. The alternative begins by insisting
that governments
must be duty-bound to provide Canada with a modern
aim which serves the
people and society. The economy can be organized
so that each part
supports each other and complements the whole
under the control and
direction of the actual producers.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
A modern society requires enormous public
revenue to meet the
needs of itself and its members. Only one source
of public revenue
exists and that is the economic base of the
society and the new value
working people produce.
The modern economy of
industrial mass production is more than capable of
providing enough
public revenue to meet the needs of society and
its members. However, a
dominant social force in control of the economy
and state obstructs the
new value workers produce from meeting the needs
of the people and
society. The ruling elite in control do this in
the following ways
amongst others.
A global imperialist oligarchy has
seized control of the basic sectors of the economy
and the social
product workers produce depriving society and its
members of this much
needed value. The problems of needed investments
can be sorted out once
the people gain control of the basic sectors of
the economy with public
enterprise and bring the social product workers
produce under the
control of the society and its members within
relations of production
that are human-centred.
A modern society is more
than capable of using the new value workers
produce to meet the needs
of the people and solve problems in ways the
actual producers and
others in society decide.
The state under the
control of oligopolies uses much of the public
revenue it amasses to
pay the rich in various ways and defend the
privilege, wealth and power
of the oligarchs and serve their narrow private
interests. Taxes on
individuals and borrowing from the oligarchs are a
major source of
public revenue in the present. These methods of
obtaining public
revenue are counterproductive and abusive to the
working people who
produce all value.
A crucial demand at this time is
for governments to stop using public revenue to
pay the rich, stop
taxing individuals, and stop borrowing from the
global imperialist
oligarchy.
Public revenue should come directly from
the enterprises where workers produce new value
and be used to increase
investments in social programs to guarantee the
well-being of the
people and for extended reproduction of the
economy.
How
to bring this direction into being starts with the
demand to stop
paying the rich and increase investment in social
programs. This is a
worthy project for the people to take up at this
time.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
One of the major problems Canada has
faced in the past 20 to 30 years is the issue of
cutbacks to social
spending which takes place because the rich use
the political power to
advance their own narrow private interests. It is
clear that working
people cannot make headway on this question unless
they tackle the
problem on the basis of modern definitions, guided
by the aim of giving
rise to a modern society. As long as the battle is
waged within the
narrow confines of the bourgeois notions of
society in which everything
must be subordinated to the profit-making aim of
the economically
powerful, the direction of the economy will not be
turned around in a
manner which favours the people.
It is not a
matter that things went well in the past and are
not doing so well in
the present. The Canadian state has never provided
health care or
education or any other requirements of modern life
by virtue of
recognizing fundamental and inviolable human
rights. In Canada, social
spending has always been determined by the needs
of the capitalist
ruling circles. Providing for the needs of the
people is really
incidental to the needs of the capitalist economy.
This is why the
conception of rights can just as easily be
extended as taken away.
To open the path for progress, health care and
education,
employment and a livelihood, must be recognized as
human rights. It is
by providing these rights with a guarantee that
progress is made from
one stage to the next to the next.
In the course of
creating the conditions for its own emancipation,
the working class --
as the most revolutionary and productive force --
fights for a society
which recognizes that all individuals are born to
society and as a
consequence have rights which are inviolable. The
working class also
fights for legislation that will enable the people
to exercise these
rights. This is the orientation which can enable
all those who are
under attack to advance their aims.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
Discussion
of the Pay-the-Rich Economy and How to Overcome It
![](../images2020/WorkersEconomy/Slogans/190427-Montreal-MarcheTerre-MLPC-15cr.jpg)
In the rush
of governments to "reopen the economy" on behalf
of the ruling elite,
dictatorial measures are being imposed to stop
workers from
implementing the lessons learned during the fight
against the pandemic.
The ruling oligarchs demand a return to business
as usual even though
the status quo has proved unsustainable in
practice. Working people
have discovered that if a society fit for human
existence is to be
built then business as usual within the old status
quo must be
rejected. The experience of the people before and
in particular during
the pandemic leads inexorably to such a
conclusion.
The
defining moment we are passing through today is
the collective
recognition that economic, political and social
affairs as constituted
do not allow members of society to solve the
problems they face and to
build a new pro-social way of life that favours
them. The militant and
responsible stand of the workers and their
organizations not only
affirms the growing movement against the
decades-old anti-social
offensive, it poses the issue of what aim the
movement should have. The
working class has the social responsibility to
define clearly its aim
to create a society fit for human beings and to
lead the entire people
to achieve the aim as a nation-building project
they embrace as their
own. Such a society of necessity respects the
rights of all by virtue
of all being bona fide full and equal members of
the polity and meets
their needs at a level of existence achieved
through the development of
the modern productive forces and scientific
technique.
The
fulfilment of the aim of the movement to build the
New requires working
people themselves finding solutions to the
problems life is posing:
- to defend themselves against the current
attacks on their
rights and their well-being and on society itself;
-
to work out practical ways which mobilize the
broad section of workers
to hold governments and employers to account so as
to attain control
over the decisions that affect their lives;
- to
hold forums where workers speak in their own name
and establish
reference points which serve to provide them with
orientation;
- to ensure the state and governments fulfil
their
responsibilities to meet the needs of the people;
and
-
to put forward their own agenda to humanize the
social and natural
environment and ensure its realization.
The ruling
oligarchy has descended into a clique of the
global rich that runs
roughshod not only over the working people of
Canada but over those
they dominate in alliance with the oligarchs from
the United States of
North American Monopolies. They dominate the world
they control with an
economy based on a mode of production to pay
tribute to the rich and
serve their political power and privilege. The
current mode of
production to pay the rich gives rise to recurring
economic crises and
war.
The aim of the economy to pay the rich renders
it incapable of mobilizing its tremendous
productive powers to solve
the problems the people and Mother Earth face. The
working people are
charged with the task of bringing into being a new
mode of production
with a new aim to serve the people, to humanize
the social and natural
environment, and to solve national and
international problems without
violence and war. The initial and crucial step in
building the New is
to organize the people to stop paying the rich, to
increase investments
in social programs and to constitute themselves as
an anti-war
government.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
The current mode of production
holds within itself the objective conditions that
drive those in
control to pay the rich through an anti-social
offensive and war. The
mode of production came into being during the
seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries by developing the productive
forces and depriving
the ruling feudal aristocracy of their economic,
political and social
power. Those who rose to power in the economy and
eventually in
politics did so based on their control of private
property in the form
of money wealth, land and means of production.
They out-produced the
peasant farms and guilds of the feudal system of
petty production and
eventually rendered them extinct, leaving many
without any means of
subsistence, forcing them to move to the growing
cities to find a means
of living.
The owners of property mobilized their
private wealth to buy workers' capacity to work
for use in their
factories of industrial mass production, providing
working people a
means of subsistence, however precarious and
rudimentary. The owners of
property rapidly increased their wealth by
mobilizing their control of
political power to march armies abroad to steal
the wealth and lives of
others through colonial occupation and plunder,
war and the slave trade.
The Concentration of Wealth in Fewer Hands
The
mode of production that displaced the rural petty
production of the
landed aristocracy holds within it the inevitable
concentration of
wealth and power in fewer hands. The early years
of what became known
as laissez-faire
capitalism immediately began to concentrate
production in larger and
larger factories and integrated combines of
production and banking. By
the end of the nineteenth century, the merging of
banks and industries
into giant socialized cartels constantly expanding
around the world
became known as monopoly capitalism, creating the
objective conditions
ripe for change to socialism.
The concentration
of wealth and power continues, as starkly evident
during the pandemic
when the private wealth of the twelve richest
oligarchs in the United
States has doubled to over one trillion dollars.
Such massive wealth,
power and privilege have developed into the
control of governments at
all levels to pay the rich and serve their private
interests through
the seizure of ever greater amounts of the value
working people
produce, war, and the despoiling of Mother Earth.
The
working class, whose members are the actual
producers, has emerged as
the essential human factor with the ability and
aim to change the mode
of production of the transition period to serve
the well-being and
rights of all and build the New. Only workers, by
activating the human
factor/social consciousness to provide a new
pro-social aim to mobilize
the massive productive powers of modern industrial
mass production, can
save human beings from the ruling elite that have
fallen into despotism
and destructive practices worse than those of the
ruling aristocracy
they displaced.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
The current mode of production, based
on private ownership of the means of production
and the aim to seize
for private gain the added-value workers produce,
holds within it the
trend of a falling rate of profit arising from the
application of
science to methods of work and production called
productivity.
The ratio between the total investment and the
number of
workers necessary during production determines in
broad measure the
rate of profit. The rate of profit under the
current mode of production
is constantly depressed by ever-increasing amounts
of invested value
necessary to activate workers.
As the number of
workers in production falls with the development
of the productive
forces, such as with the use of robots and
Artificial Intelligence
(AI), the rate of profit from the total investment
declines. This
growth in productivity is a double-edged sword for
the oligarchs. It
allows them to compete and possibly wipe out their
competitors but it
brings with it a falling rate of profit.
The rate
of profit is expressed as a ratio in social
product between the old
value to new value or more specifically between
the added-value the
current workers produce and the sum of their
reproduced-value (wages,
benefits and social programs) and the
transferred-value from fixed
value (buildings and machinery etc) and
circulating value (consumed
energy and material etc). Profit is derived from
the new value workers
produce, specifically the added-value. Profit does
not come from the
fixed and circulating value transferred into
production from already
produced value.
Phenomenal amounts of investment
are needed to set in motion the workers who
produce the new value the
oligarchs crave. The rich have long sought ways to
overcome this trend
of a falling rate of profit. Instead of investing
in the productive
economy, they have gone increasingly into the
parasitism and decay of
selling and reselling already produced value, into
stock markets and
commodity markets, and into Ponzi-type schemes to
bilk small investors
of the wealth they hold.
The other dominant way is
to have governments pay the rich through public
investments in their
enterprises or through contracts for social
product at inflated prices.
No major investment in the economy of any type
occurs without
governments participating through handouts, tax
exemptions, the use of
public infrastructure for the big enterprises at
preferred rates and
other pay-the-rich schemes, such as public-private
partnerships,
buyouts similar to the Trudeau government purchase
of the Trans
Mountain pipeline from the monopoly Kinder Morgan
or other schemes.
The concentration of wealth and power in fewer
hands and their
control of governments, coupled with the trend of
a falling rate of
profit, have meant that the mode of production has
become one of paying
the rich. All major investments include payments
to the rich from the
collective wealth held by the state. No investment
of any size proceeds
without government guarantees of state payments to
the rich. No
decision in politics or economic affairs is made
without the
consideration of the rich oligarchs in control.
Objectively,
this situation indicates that the rich oligarchs
have become
superfluous and have no reason to be involved in
the economy. The
economy is socialized. The actual producers, the
working class, must
become the owners and directors of the already
socialized and
interrelated economy so that the power of its
productive forces can be
organized and unleashed to build the nation and
serve the people and
society without interruption, crises and war.
The
current mode of production based on private
property has run its course
and must give way to the New where the actual
producers, the working
class and its allies who produce the wealth, are
in control and set
their own aim for the economy and society in
conformity with the
already socialized economy and its needs and those
of the people.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
![](../images2020/WorkersEconomy/Slogans/100626-TorontoG20WhoDecides-004.jpg)
If the issue
of the method or means of subsistence is not
understood, the workers'
movement and its aim remain vague without
sharpness and a confident
direction. This final stage of the transition from
petty to industrial
mass production is not the same as before in the
early period of the
transition with what was called laissez-faire
capitalism. Similarities exist but the situation
has changed
considerably. As long as this pay-the-rich means
of creating a
subsistence for people is not radically
challenged, nothing can be
solved and no forward progress for the workers'
movement and society
can be sustained.
Within this discussion, workers
should think about what they would establish as
the means of
subsistence. The starting point is to stop paying
the rich and increase
investments in social programs to guarantee the
rights of all, to have
the collective will of the society expressed in
the form of socialist
planning and control by the working people over
those affairs that
affect their lives. Collectively, the society
would march forward and
in the way of the old proverb would learn warfare
through warfare.
Within the
situation, the workers put forward their own
demands. The demands are
to stop paying the rich, to stop all public
borrowing from private
lenders, to stop handouts to the rich and their
enterprises, and to
increase investments in social programs in
education, health, welfare,
culture and recreation in particular for the
youth. With this start, a
rupture with the Old can be made and a new
direction embraced. The
immense social product available from the modern
means of production
can be put to use to solve society's problems and
guarantee the
well-being and rights of the people and the
extended reproduction of
the economy. Without the starting point to stop
paying the rich, no
change in the direction of the economy can be
sustained.
Whenever
a crisis occurs, as is the case at the present
time, it becomes clear
that either the working people move towards
creating a higher form of
society, or they continue to face one disaster
after another. Workers
have to demand a radical rupture from the past and
that rupture is
presented in the slogan "Stop Paying the Rich!"
While
all of this points to the necessity for the
working class to establish
its own political aim, the attempt is made, once
again, to keep it
chained to the political aim of this or that party
with aims to serve
private interests. This capitulation to the
parties of the rich flies
in the face of the experience of all Canadians,
which is that whether a
party's agenda is touted as right-wing or
left-wing, it serves the
corporate elite and old status quo.
The struggle
today is between the forces of the New and the
forces of the Old. The
working class must resolutely take up its own
political aim to end the
situation whereby the rich marginalize it by
diverting its struggle
into electing this or that so-called
representative and party of the
rich oligarchs, no matter what they may call
themselves.
As
the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist)
steps up its work, its
members and allies are firmly convinced that an
alternative to the
current direction of paying the rich can be found.
Activists are
confident that by consciously participating in
building workers' forums
to exchange views, analyze unfolding events and
set their own
orientation to defend the rights of all, the
program to stop paying the
rich and to increase investments in social
programs will lead to the
establishment of an alternative and open society's
path to
progress.
Join the movement for the New!
![Haut de page](top.gif)
Anniversary
of Attack on Twin Towers and Coup d'État in Chile
- Dougal MacDonald -
![](../images2020/LatAmCaribbean/Chile/File/170911-ChileAnnivofCoup-elderchoalapz-02cr.jpg)
March in Santiago,
September 2017, commemorates 44th anniversary of
the coup in Chile.
September 11 marks the 47th anniversary of the
U.S.
imperialist coup d'état organized in Chile in
which the
Pinochet regime murdered, tortured, and imprisoned
thousands of people.
On this occasion, let us remember the victims of
the Pinochet regime
and Operation Condor that extended
these
crimes to Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil. To this
day, relatives of the
victims are fighting to bring the perpetrators of
these crimes to
justice.[1]
Today, as the U.S. state cites adherence to
"American values"
as the criteria to decide who are enemies of the
state, it is proper to
recall that the crimes committed in Chile and
throughout Latin America
were against those identified as "enemies of
western Christian
civilization." Their "crime" was their political
beliefs, affiliations
or activism. With Santiago's stadium converted
into a holding pen,
people were rounded up and massacred. At the
Moneda Presidential Palace
the constitutional President Salvador Allende was
murdered. These
crimes continued throughout the years of
Pinochet's rule and extended
far beyond Chile's borders, even to Washington, DC
itself. The military
junta led by army general Augusto Pinochet, with
the full support of
the U.S., ran Chile officially and "unofficially"
for the next 25 years.
Clearly exposing the U.S. role in the Chilean
coup, an October
1970 cable to CIA operatives in Chile from Henry
Kissinger's "Track
Two" group states: "It is firm and continuing
policy that [the
democratically elected government of] Allende be
overthrown by a
coup.... We are to continue to generate maximum
pressure toward this
end utilizing every appropriate resource. It is
imperative that these
actions be implemented clandestinely and securely
so that the USG
[United States Government] and American hands be
well hidden." In 2007,
it was revealed that millions of dollars that
Pinochet stole from the
Chilean people had been held in a secret account
in the Bush-connected
Riggs Bank in Washington, DC since 1994, with full
knowledge of U.S.
banking officials. No U.S. President has
apologized for U.S. backing of
Pinochet's crimes and U.S. involvement in the 1973
coup.
![](../images2020/LatAmCaribbean/Chile/File/130800-ChileSantiago-ExhibitioninMuseumMemoryHumanRights-01crop2.jpg)
Display
in Santiago Museum memorializes the
victims of the Pinochet coup in
Chile.
|
Prior to the coup in Chile, the U.S. already had
a long and
bloody history of organizing and backing violent
coups
d'état in Latin America; for example, Guatemala,
Brazil,
Nicaragua and Panama to name only a few. With the
1823 Monroe Doctrine,
the U.S. served notice that it claimed Latin
America for itself. Almost
immediately, the U.S. grabbed one-third of Mexico
through military
force. Since the 1890s, when it achieved regional
supremacy over Spain
and Britain, the U.S. has forcibly intervened in
Latin America over 50
times. A significant role in these interventions,
including Operation
Condor, has been played by the Latin American
Anti-Communist
Confederation which was founded in 1972 by
Guatemalan death squad
leader Mario Sandoval Alarcón as the Latin
American branch
of the World Anti-Communist League, co-founded in
Taiwan in 1966 by
Nazi war criminals and other fascists.
Forty-seven
years after the coup in Chile, the U.S. continues
to organize and back
violent coups d'état, as it did in Honduras in
2009. The
U.S. continues to form aggressive alliances, build
military bases in
client states such as Colombia, treat surrounding
bodies of water as if
they were American lakes, and carry out subversive
actions against
those democratically elected governments of
Latin American
countries such as Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia and
Nicaragua that exercise
the right to choose their own political system,
free of U.S.
interference. Two major channels for this
subversion through which
millions of dollars are supplied to U.S.-supported
political groups in
Latin American countries are USAID and the U.S.
National Endowment for
Democracy. The secret dirty wars that the U.S.
previously conducted in
the Southern Cone and Central America in collusion
with local military
forces have now become open.
Of
growing concern is the pernicious role that the
Trudeau government is
playing in the name of promoting "prosperity and
security" in the
hemisphere. As the countries of the Americas work
to defend their
sovereignty and establish alternatives to an
economic model which
devastates them, the Trudeau government touts its
role in the
Organization of American States, infamous for
perpetrating U.S. coups
d'état and the dirty wars of the 1960s, '70s and
'80s and
for
using its so-called Inter-American Democratic
Charter as a tool for
more of the same in the 21st century.
Trudeau's
pronouncements about so-called democracy in Latin
America cast
aspersions on Venezuela and other countries which
are defending their
right to follow their own paths to development.
This reveals the
Trudeau government's agenda to carry on
interfering in the internal
affairs of the countries of Latin America and what
"advances of
democracy" it has in mind.
Needless to
say, the peoples of the Americas are not passive,
waiting for the kind
of democracy the Trudeau government advocates.
Their struggle for
freedom is written in their blood and nothing
confirms this more than
the struggle for justice for the crimes committed
by the U.S.-installed
Pinochet dictatorship and the dirty wars which
still carry on in the
name of free trade, democracy, the war on drugs,
etc.
Families
and friends continue to look for the disappeared
and to demand justice
for what happened to them. Incredibly, political
prisoners continue to
linger in jail while virtually none of those
responsible for human
rights violations have been prosecuted for their
crimes. Pinochet
himself, protected by the imperialists, eluded
justice and died without being
punished for his crimes.
On this occasion, we
express our deepest sympathies to the heroic
Chilean people and to the
families and friends of all those killed and
disappeared in the
infamous coup and subsequent regime. We hail the
resolute struggle of
the Chilean people to achieve justice for the
crimes committed by the
Pinochet regime and its U.S. patrons. The
September 11, 1973
U.S.-backed coup d'état in Chile, an act of state
terrorism,
exposed the true character of U.S. imperialism,
which the people of the
world will never forget.
Note
1. Operation Condor was a
campaign
of political assassination and repression
officially created in 1975 in
Santiago, Chile by the ruling circles of Chile,
Argentina, Uruguay and
Brazil to eradicate socialist and communist
influence and ideas and to
eliminate opposition movements against the
participating governments.
The U.S. first proposed the plan for Operation
Condor in 1968, calling
for "the coordinated employment of internal
security forces within and
among Latin American countries." Condor was
responsible for a minimum
of 60,000 deaths, 30,000 "desaparecidos," and
400,000 incarcerated.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
-
Nick Lin -
![](../images2020/WorkersEconomy/Slogans/20011117-Ottawa-G20Protest-002Cr2.jpg)
September 11 this year marks the 19th anniversary
of the tragic
terrorist attacks in New York, Washington, DC and
Pennsylvania that
gave the U.S. imperialists, along with appeasers
of U.S. imperialism
like Canada, the pretext for their brutal and
unending worldwide "war
on terror."
Claiming
to be bringing justice to
those who died, the U.S. government said that the
government of
Afghanistan was responsible for providing aid and
training to those who
carried out the 9/11 attacks, despite never
providing any proof of such
responsibility. Less than a month after the
attacks, the U.S. invaded
Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, with the support
of NATO countries
including Canada. The Chrétien government
announced
"Operation Apollo" and committed air, sea and land
support and 2,000
troops. Working people in the U.S., Canada and
elsewhere immediately
made it clear that this revenge-seeking was not
carried out in
their name.
In a study published September
8, titled "Creating Refugees: Displacement Caused
by the United
States' Post-9/11 Wars," Professor David Vine and
his students at the
Watson Institute of International and Public
Affairs at Brown
University in Providence, Rhode Island, attempt to
quantify the
catastrophic human costs in terms of those
displaced by the past 19
years of the U.S. war on terror.
![](../images2020/Antiwar/File/030330-TorontoAntiWar-04cr2.jpg)
Toronto demonstration,
March 30, 2003, against U.S. war in Iraq, part of
large-scale
opposition across Canada to U.S. wars of
aggression.
In their
introduction to the paper, the authors point out:
"Since
the George W. Bush administration launched a
'global war on terror'
following Al Qaeda's September 11, 2001 attacks on
the United States,
the U.S. military has waged war continuously for
almost two decades. In
that time, U.S. forces have fought in wars or
participated in other
combat operations in at least 24 countries. The
destruction inflicted
by warfare in these countries has been
incalculable for civilians and
combatants, for U.S. military personnel and their
family members, and
for entire societies. Deaths and injuries number
in the millions."
Notwithstanding some mischaracterizations of the
U.S.
conflicts covered in their study, the authors
indicate that this paper
"calculates the total number of displaced people
in the eight post-9/11
wars in which U.S. forces have been most
significantly involved. We
focus on wars where the U.S. government bears a
clear responsibility
for initiating armed combat (the overlapping
Afghanistan/Pakistan war
and the post-2003 war in Iraq); for escalating
armed conflict (U.S. and
European intervention in the Libyan uprising
against Muammar Gaddafi
and Libya's ongoing civil war and U.S. involvement
in Syria); or for
being a significant participant in combat through
drone strikes,
battlefield advising, logistical support, arms
sales, and other means
(U.S. forces' involvement in wars in Yemen,
Somalia, and the
Philippines)."
The paper documents "several
categories of people displaced by the post-9/11
wars: 1) refugees, 2)
asylum seekers pursuing protection as refugees,
and 3) internally
displaced persons or people (IDPs)."
The study
gives the following as its major findings:
"- The
U.S. post-9/11 wars have forcibly displaced at
least 37
million people in and from Afghanistan,
Iraq, Pakistan,
Yemen, Somalia, the Philippines, Libya, and Syria.
This exceeds
those displaced by every war since 1900, except
World War II.
"- Millions more have been displaced by
other post-9/11 conflicts involving U.S.
troops in smaller
combat operations, including in: Burkina Faso,
Cameroon, Central
African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Mali, Niger,
Saudi Arabia, and Tunisia.
"- 37 million is a very
conservative estimate. The total displaced by
the U.S.
post-9/11 wars could be closer to 48-59 million.
"- 25.3 million people have returned after
being displaced, although
return does not erase the trauma of displacement
or mean that those
displaced have returned to their original homes or
to a secure life.
"- Any number is limited in what it can
convey about
displacement's damage. The people behind
the numbers can be
difficult to see, and numbers cannot communicate
how it might feel to
lose one's home, belongings, community, and much
more. Displacement
has caused incalculable harm to
individuals, families,
towns, cities, regions, and entire countries
physically, socially,
emotionally, and economically."
Putting these
figures in the broader global context, the authors
state that "The
United States' post-9/11 wars have contributed
significantly to the
dramatic increase in recent years in the number of
people displaced by
war and violent conflict worldwide: Between 2010
and 2019, the total
number of refugees and IDPs globally has nearly
doubled from 41 million
to 79.5 million."[1]
It is worthwhile
to note that the scope of the study does not
include other forms of
U.S. aggression during this time, such as
sanctions against countries
that the U.S. claims support terrorism against it
and the resulting
destruction of infrastructure and loss of life.
The study also does not
include countries where the U.S. has backed
and fomented coups
such as Haiti and Honduras, where the situation
for the people has yet
to stabilize and many have been forced to flee due
to economic or
security issues.
Canada is increasingly implicated
in the last 19 years of the U.S. war on terror as
an appeaser of U.S.
imperialism, bearing part of the responsibility
for the tens of
millions of refugees created by U.S. wars of
aggression in that period.
Canada's role is particularly unconscionable in
that it provides a
human face and high ideals for U.S.-led
aggression. It also presents
itself as a condescending saviour for the victims
of war that it has
played a part in creating. All of it is
unacceptable, an affront to the
memory of those killed on 9/11, and anathema to
working people in
Canada who reject any Canadian involvement in U.S.
wars of aggression
and want Canada to be a zone of peace and a
country that upholds the
peaceful resolution of conflicts worldwide.
Note
1. To read the paper
in full, click
here.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
United
States
Postal workers in the
United States have been consistently organizing to
keep the U.S. Postal
Service (USPS) a public service providing for the
public good. This has
included opposing efforts by the government to
privatize USPS, to slow
and disrupt mail delivery, and to undermine
working conditions and
collective bargaining rights of the workers. In
addition, they have
been opposing the anti-worker propaganda according
to which the postal
service cannot cope with mail-in ballots during
the pandemic and would
thus undermine results in the November
presidential election.
The USPS
has been in the news lately, mainly as it relates
to mail-in voting.
Postal workers have brought to the fore that they
are capable of
handling an increase in mail-in ballots, which is
nothing compared to
the mail delivered at Christmas time. A lack of
money will not stop
timely delivery. In the week before Christmas, for
example, workers
often process and deliver 2.5 billion pieces of
first-class mail, or
about 500 million cards and letters a day, not to
mention packages.
Even if every one of the country's more than 150
million registered
voters mailed their ballot, the workers could
handle the volume.
In their many protests, letters and petitions,
workers and
their unions say that the bigger problem now is
the elimination of
overtime, insufficient safety equipment, and the
refusal to hire and
train more workers to compensate for the estimated
40,000 workers
dealing with COVID-19 infections or quarantines.
The elimination of
mail-sorting machines and mail collection boxes is
a problem, one that
new Postmaster General Louis DeJoy has said he
will now stop -- with 95
per cent of the machines already removed. He said
overtime will only be
permitted "as needed," which means it continues to
be limited in
various ways. There is also a new policy not to
treat all ballots as
first-class mail, as is usually the case. All of
these actions are
aimed not so much at impacting mail-in voting, but
rather at forcing
tremendous speed-up of the COVID-decimated
workforce, making it appear
the USPS cannot deliver the mail in a timely
fashion. This then is used
to justify privatization and greater interference
by the government,
through the Treasury Department, in USPS policies
and contracts with
workers.
Postal workers, numbering about 630,000,
deliver mail to more than 160 million households
daily. They provide a
crucial public service, especially in these times
of the COVID-19
pandemic. Prescriptions, social security and
unemployment cheques,
food, medical supplies and more are delivered to
homes in cities and
rural areas and everywhere in between.
All four
postal unions are working together to demand USPS
be operated as a
public service and not sold off to private
interests, and to secure
safety equipment, hazard pay and better working
conditions for postal
workers.
In addition to the estimated 40,000
workers contending either with COVID infections or
quarantine, more
than 60 have died.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/SavethePostOfficeGraphic-ApwU.jpg)
Postal
workers are contending with a funding crisis
created by the government
to justify privatizing the postal service. A law
passed in 2006
requires that the United States Postal Service
(USPS) prefund 75 years
of future health care premiums for retired postal
employees. As the
National Association of Letter Carriers points
out, "This prefunding
mandate, which no other enterprise in the country
faces, costs an
average of $5.4 billion annually since 2007,
accounting for nearly 90
per cent of the agency's losses. Between 2013 and
2018 it accounted for
100 per cent of the losses. On an operational
basis, the Postal Service
has been profitable for most of the past decade."
This
requirement is part of the anti-social offensive
to undermine the
functioning of USPS so as to justify privatization
and attacks on its
workers.
Previous efforts
at privatization include a Presidential Task Force
chaired by the
Treasury Department's Steven Mnuchin that in
December 2018 proposed
unprecedented service cuts to the Postal Service,
cuts in postal worker
pay and benefits, and increases in package prices.
This followed a June
2018 Office of Management and Budget report that
called for postal
service privatization, something Mnuchin, a former
hedge fund operator,
continues to promote. The Treasury Department is
involved as the USPS
commonly draws on a $15 billion line of yearly
credit from the
Treasury, authorized by Congress 30 years ago.
Current
government attacks also include a refusal to
provide emergency funding.
First-class and marketing mail, the service's top
two funding sources,
have slowed down significantly due to the pandemic
while provision of
needed safety equipment -- still insufficient --
has increased. Without
the pandemic and without the 75-year benefit
requirement, the USPS is
self sustaining.
USPS is also largely independent
of direct government interference. The appointment
of Louis DeJoy as
Postmaster General, along with interference by
Mnuchin, are efforts to
change that and make it easier to attack the
workers and USPS as a
public service.
The American Postal Workers Union
(APWU) said in May: "Fifty years ago, postal
workers waged a heroic
nationwide strike to win better pay, benefits and
the right to
collective bargaining. This strike also recreated
the United States
Postal Service as an independent agency, designed
to be free from the
political patronage and cronyism that had plagued
the old Post Office
Department. The APWU is deeply concerned with the
appointment process
to make Mr. Louis DeJoy, a multi-million-dollar
major donor to
President Trump, the next Postmaster General and
whether the
Administration has returned to the days of
political interference and
patronage. He can choose to be a Postmaster
General who implements the
destructive plans of this White House: raising
postal rates, cutting
services, undermining stable union and
family-sustaining jobs and
selling the public Postal Service to corporations
for their private
profit. And if that is his choice, Mr. DeJoy will
be met with stiff
resistance from postal workers and the people of
this country."
The developments have shown that their concerns
are legitimate
and the broad resistance to privatization and
destruction of the public
service persists.
Mnuchin has also
used the emergency funding required by USPS at
this time to further
interfere. A $10 billion loan from Treasury was
included in the CARES
Act passed in March. The CARES Act
also included hundreds of billions of dollars,
basically with no
strings attached, for the giant monopolies. USPS
was to get $10
billion, even though its Board of Directors have
asked Congress for $75
billion in funding -- $25 billion in emergency
appropriations, another
$25 billion for "shovel-ready" projects to
modernize the agency's aging
vehicle fleet and facilities, and an added $25
billion line of credit.
Mnuchin has so far refused even the $10 billion.
"We are going
to put certain criteria for a postal reform
program as part of the
loan," Mnuchin said.
The unions point out that
currently, the USPS Board of Governors has the
exclusive authority to
appoint or remove the Postmaster General or
"direct and control the
expenditures and review the practices and policies
of the Postal
Service." Mnuchin is trying to gain greater
control so that many USPS
management decisions, including the terms of major
contracts and
policies related to privatization and pricing of
packages and first
class mail would be decided by the U.S. Treasury
Department, not the
USPS Board of Governors.
The appointment of
multimillionaire DeJoy as Postmaster General is
itself part of this
direction, as his attacks on workers and USPS as a
public service
indicate. DeJoy is the first Postmaster General in
more than 20 years
to lead the agency without prior experience
working there. The USPS
Board of Governors itself now consists of four
members who have been on
the job for less than two years. More experienced
executives have
resigned in protest of Mnuchin's interference, or
have been removed by
DeJoy.
The public has stood firm with postal
workers and continues to join with them in
demanding that USPS remain a
public service for the public good. In actions,
petitions and polls, a
majority have called for full funding now and
guaranteeing the health,
safety and jobs of postal workers providing a
vital public service.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
- National Association of Letter
Carriers -
At a time when the heroic workers of the U.S.
Postal Service
(USPS) are braving infection to serve the country
during an
unprecedented national crisis, it is imperative
that representatives at
all levels of the federal government have a
fundamental understanding
of the value of the postal service, the cause of
and solutions to its
current financial circumstances, and the dangers
to the U.S. economy
and rural health in the event of a USPS
insolvency.
During an April
24 press event, President Trump was asked about a
Washington Post
report that the Treasury Department wants to take
control of collective
bargaining, set pricing policy, and decide senior
executive
appointments in return for the Postal Service's
access to a $10 billion
line of credit provided by the CARES Act.
At an
April 7 daily press briefing on the pandemic,
President Trump was asked
about his Administration's opposition to financial
relief for the
Postal Service in the recently enacted CARES
Act,
as reported by Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) to a DC
television station.
Congressman Connolly warned that the Postal
Service could run out of
money if action is not taken. The President's
responses warrant some
clarification about the status of the Postal
Service:
1)
Nobody is blaming the President for the current
crisis facing the
Postal Service. However, the COVID-19 pandemic
threatens its survival.
The shutdown of the American economy to fight the
COVID-19
virus has resulted in plummeting postal revenues
-- just as we have
seen in the airline and hospitality industries,
which have been given
massive relief. The USPS needs the same kind of
relief because it must
still keep delivering. Every day it delivers tens
of millions of
prescription drugs, invoices, payments,
newspapers, e-commerce
deliveries, and soon it will be needed to deliver
stimulus checks, home
virus tests and other pandemic-related goods and
information.
2) The President noted that the Postal Service
has been losing
money for years. That is true, but not due to the
pricing of its
package services. The real reason is Congress
imposed a crushing
mandate on the Postal Service back in 2006,
requiring it to prefund
decades of future health care premiums for retired
postal employees in
advance. This prefunding mandate, which no other
enterprise in the
country faces, costs an average of $5.4 billion
annually since 2007,
accounting for nearly 90 per cent of the agency's
losses. Between 2013
and 2018 it accounted for 100 per cent of the
losses. On an operational
basis, the Postal Service has been profitable for
most of the past
decade.
Senator Ron Johnson, who chairs the Senate
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Committee, has called the
prefunding mandate a mistake. In February, the
House passed the USPS
Fairness Act (H.R. 2382) by an overwhelming
vote of 309-106,
including 87 Republicans voting in favour.
President Trump should urge
the Senate to pass the bipartisan Senate companion
bill (S. 2965),
introduced by Senator Steve Daines [which has not
yet occurred] and
sign it into law.
3) The President has been told by
private shippers and others that the Postal
Service underprices its
delivery services for e-commerce packages from
Amazon and other
internet companies. This is not true. By law, each
of the Postal
Service's competitive products must earn "profits"
to cover the cost of
universal service. In 2019, the USPS surplus on
package services was
$8.3 billion, an amount verified by its regulator,
the Postal
Regulatory Commission.
The President is
being fed bad information, often at the behest of
private shipping
companies with a commercial axe to grind against
the Postal Service,
which is committed to public service, not
commercial profits.
The Postal Service's shipping services are
affordable because
it has the best and most efficient last-mile
delivery network in the
country, linking 160 million households and
businesses every day of the
week. The President is right that the Postal
Service has routes
established in every nook and cranny in America,
and because it is
delivering letters, flyers, newspapers and
prescriptions to every door
every day, it can deliver packages very cost
effectively. That benefits
every American, but it also benefits the private
companies (UPS, FedEx
and Amazon) who rely on the Postal Service for
last mile delivery.
4) The President has said that the Postal Service
should raise
its prices on Package Delivery, suggesting the
rates should quadruple.
While his revenue-raising intentions might be well
placed, the result
of such a policy would more likely lead to the
loss of competitive
volume and higher prices for average Americans.
Such a scenario would
harm all American consumers and millions of small
businesses who rely
on the Post Office, especially those living and
operating in rural
states and inner cities that are not well served
by private shipping
companies, such as Amazon.
Ironically, allowing the
Postal Service to fail would essentially divert
business to Amazon and
other higher-priced private companies, none of
which can replicate the
Postal Service's universal first- and last-mile
delivery network.
Unlike private companies, the Postal Service
delivers to every home and
business at affordable prices.
It is also important
to note that the Postal Service's actual and
projected losses in volume
and revenue have nothing to do with packages,
rather the losses are
from letter mail drying up due to the economy
shutting down. Further,
the American people, who themselves are facing
financial insecurity,
need affordable package delivery, especially right
now. This is not a
time -- during a pandemic -- to significantly
raise package rates.
The pandemic is threatening the Postal Service at
a time when
its affordable, universal reach is needed more
than ever. Last week,
USPS delivered President Trump's guidelines for
social distancing to
every American household. Even as letter volume
has plummeted in recent
weeks, package deliveries have spiked as millions
of Americans,
sheltering in place to stop the spread of the
deadly COVID-19 virus,
order goods online. The Postal Service must also
be there for us when
self-administered tests and therapeutic drugs are
developed to combat
the virus.
The Postal Service, the heart of the
$1.6 trillion mailing industry that employs 7
million Americans, will
also be crucial for economic recovery. It will
deliver stimulus checks
to the tens of millions who do not have bank
accounts or who have not
given bank information to the IRS. Once the crisis
is over, the country
and its businesses will need the Postal Service to
restore the economy.
Indeed, in normal times, the USPS delivers 4
million prescriptions to
American households. A third of all household
bills are still paid
through the mail, and millions of small businesses
and household-based
merchants rely on the Postal Service for package
delivery, invoicing
and payments.
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200623-USPS-SaveUSPS-APWU-01cr.jpg)
The Postal
Service is not a partisan institution; it operates
in every corner of
this country and it has hundreds of thousands of
workers -- Democrats,
Republicans and Independents -- who are committed
to serving all the
American people and their businesses. It is the
largest employer in
many states and a deeply embedded part of
virtually every American
community.
The Postal Service is by far the most
trusted and most loved federal agency. It has a 90
per cent
favourability rating, according to a recent Pew
Trust survey. Congress
and the President should take action to preserve
this national treasure.
Although the Postal Service has not required any
taxpayer
subsidies since the early 1980s, it does need
taxpayer help right now.
Congress should provide an immediate injection of
cash and commit to
cover the Postal Service's losses over the next
fiscal year,
appropriating the difference between revenues and
costs until the
crisis passes. For most of its history (from 1775,
when Benjamin
Franklin was Postmaster General, all the way up to
1970), the Postal
Service was funded by taxpayers and postage. A
temporary return to this
dual-funding structure is vitally needed right
now. It would be a
tragedy to let this pandemic kill such an
important and essential
American institution.
It would also be an insult to
the 600 postal employees who have already
contracted the virus while
performing their essential duties -- and to the
6,000 who are currently
quarantined and those who have lost their lives to
the COVID-19 virus.
We urge President Trump and the entire Congress to
work together on
commonsense policies to ensure the continued
operations of the U.S.
Postal Service through this crisis.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
August 21-25
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USTX-AustinUSPSProtest.jpg)
Austin, Texas, August
25, 2020
On August 21-22, more than 800
demonstrations involving tens of thousands took
place. Workers in every
state participated. From Hawaii to Oregon,
Montana, Michigan and Maine,
from California to New Hampshire, Kansas,
Pennsylvania, West Virginia
and Florida, the demand that the Post Office is
Not For Sale, that it
must remain a Public Service and the rights of the
workers and public
respected was evident.
More than 100 organizations
joined postal workers in organizing the
demonstrations, including
teachers, veterans, healthcare workers, rural
organizers and more. The
workers have continued to inform and mobilize
various unions and the
public in general to stand with them, gaining
widespread support. On
August 25 another 300 actions took place,
organized by unions together
with civil and human rights activists. All made
clear that the USPS is
a public service that should be fully funded and
its workers fully
protected.
Expressing the support of many unions,
the Flight Attendants union said the postal
service is a "vital part of
the public health response," adding that millions
of people get their
"life-saving and life-supporting medicines,
supplies, food, and other
essential goods" through the mail.
The August
actions took place after the new Postmaster
General, Louis DeJoy, an
anti-worker, anti-union fundraiser for
Republicans, imposed changes
meant to sabotage postal delivery and set the USPS
up as unreliable and
thus in need of privatization. This included
removing an estimated 600
mail processing machines, especially at facilities
near airports, and
hundreds of blue mail boxes from street corners
across the country.
DeJoy announced July 10 that the USPS would no
longer commit to moving
the mail if it required overtime to do so. This
meant leaving mail
unsorted and undelivered for days -- something
workers say is "simply
not in their DNA."
When these attacks took place,
workers reported getting hundreds of calls,
especially from the elderly
in need of their medicine. In many places the
workers organized to
refuse to leave unsorted mail behind. Overtime was
mainly eliminated
for the initial work done by letter carriers,
known as casing, where
mail and packages not sorted by machines have to
be sorted by
the workers before they leave for their delivery
routes. Many workers
simply refused to agree to the 30 minute time
limit imposed and did not
begin their routes until that day's mail was
sorted. In Milwaukee, for
example, "Fightback Friday's" were instituted,
where workers gather
before starting work to discuss their concerns and
how best to oppose
the attacks.
The strength of the workers'
resistance as well as the public outcry about
delays forced DeJoy to
temporarily back off. He said retail hours will
not change, mail
processing equipment and blue collection boxes
will remain where they
are, no mail processing facilities will be closed,
and overtime will
continue to be approved as needed. However none of
the mail boxes and
sorting machines already removed will be returned.
As well, people in
many cities report that while mail boxes are not
being removed, they
are being locked so they cannot be used.
Honolulu,
Hawaii
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USHawaii-HonoluluUSPSProtest-01.jpg)
Seattle, Washington
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USWA-SeattleUSPSrotest.jpg)
Phoenix, Arizona
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200822-USAZ-PhoenixsSaveUSPS-BlakeBernard-01.jpg)
Flagstaff, Arizona
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USAZ-FlagstaffUSPSProtest.jpg)
Lincoln, Nebraska
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USNE-LincolnUSPSProtest.jpg)
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USOK-OklahomaCityUSPSProtest.jpg)
Dallas, Texas
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USTX-DallasUSPSProtest-01.jpg)
Chicago;
Bolingbrook, Illinois
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USIL-ChicagoUSPSProtest.jpg) ![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USIL-BolingbrookUSPSprotestcr.jpg)
Orlando;
Jacksonville, Florida
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USFL-OrlandoUSPSrotest.jpg) ![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USFL-JacksonvilleUSPSProtest.jpg)
Greensboro, North Carolina
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USNC-GreensboroUSPSProtest.jpg)
Cary, North Carolina
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USNC-CaryUSPSProtest.jpg)
Manchester, New Hampshire
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USNH-ManchesterUSPSProtest-02.jpg)
New York City, New York
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200822-USNY-NewYorkCitySaveUSPS-PierreMarcAlbert-01.jpg)
Boston, Massachusetts
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USMA-BostonUSPSProtest.jpg)
Hartford, Connecticut
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USCT-HartfordUSPSProtest.jpg)
June 23
Actions
On June 23 in two dozen cities, postal workers,
supported by the public, organized to defend the
USPS as a public service. This included demanding
funding from Congress and no further attacks on
the workers. In Washington, DC a caravan of 75
cars delivered to the Senate a petition with 2
million signatures, demanding that they vote
emergency funding for the postal service in the
upcoming HEROES
Act [still not done.] Around 200,000
people also tuned-in to a video livestream with
union representatives.
In New York
City there were demonstrations at 16 post offices
around Manhattan and
the Bronx. Participants handed out leaflets to
alert passersby that the
Postal Service is in danger of being shut down,
asking them to join in
and to call or write their senators.
In
Philadelphia people rallied in front of various
post offices or circled
in cars, honking their horns. Workers from other
unions and community
groups participated, as well as a former prisoner
who emphasized how
important the mail is to people in prison --
describing "tears falling
on letters."
The car caravan in Raleigh, North
Carolina, stopped by several local post offices on
its way to the
Capitol Post Office. The local chapter of the
Raging Grannies sang a
tribute to postal workers, to the tune of
"Solidarity Forever."
In Detroit, a union representative spoke on the
importance of
the postal service for mail-in voting in November.
In Kalamazoo, people
waved signs and invited passing pedestrians to
write and mail postcards
to Michigan's senators. Dozens did. Ann Arbor and
Ypsilanti also had
actions.
A caravan of 40 cars drove through the
heart of downtown Des Moines, Iowa. In Portland,
Oregon, demonstrators
decked out in "Save Our Postal Service" face masks
danced to "Please
Mr. Postman." Speakers included veterans and
retirees. Seattle held a
caravan of cars and bicycles from a post office to
the federal
building. One homemade sign read: "SAVE the Only
Way to Reach Everyone!"
Actions also took place in San Francisco,
Sacramento and
Roseville, California; Denver, Colorado; Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma;
Houston and San Antonio, Texas; Mankato and St.
Paul, Minnesota;
Merrillville, Indiana; St. Charles, Missouri;
Cleveland and Toledo
Ohio; Portland, Maine; Cornwall, Connecticut;
Clarksburg, West
Virginia; and Miami, Florida.
San
Francisco, California
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200623-USCA-SaFrancisco-DOA-0APWU-01cr.jpg)
St. Paul, Minnesota
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200623-USMN-StPaul-SaveUSPS-APWUcr.jpg)
Des Moines, Iowa
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200623-USIA-DesMoinesUSPSProtest.jpg)
Joplin,
Missouri
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200825-USMO-JoplinUSPSProtest.jpg)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200626-USPA-PhiladelphiaUSPSProtest-02.jpg)
New York City, New York
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200623-USNY_NYCUSPSProtest.jpg)
Washington, DC
![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200623-USDC-USPSProtest-01.jpg) ![](../images2020/US/SaveUSPS/200623-USDC-USPSProtest-03cr.jpg)
![Haut de page](top.gif)
Made in
Cuba
- Gerardo Szalkowicz -
![](../images2020/LatAmCaribbean/Cuba/cuba-soberana.jpg)
If not for the unwritten
premise of the imperialist media that anything
good about Cuba is not
to be reported, it would be striking that this
piece of news has gone
practically unnoticed: that in recent days the
vaccine "Soberana 01" ["Sovereign"
in English -- TML Ed. Note] began clinical
trials in humans
and became the first in Latin America -- and in
the entire so-called
underdeveloped world -- to advance to this second
phase.
So
far there are 167 potential vaccines registered
for COVID-19. The Cuban
one joined 29 others that the WHO has already
approved for clinical
studies, six of which are in phase 3 that involves
large-scale human
testing. In Latin America there are another dozen
national vaccines in
development but, except for the Cuban one, all are
in the preclinical
phase.
The candidate vaccine that the island is
producing is advancing steadily. Since clinical
trials began on August
24, "it has reported zero serious adverse events
after the injection of
the first 20 volunteers," tweeted Dagmar García
Rivera,
director of research at the Finlay Institute, the
Cuban state
scientific centre that is directing the project.
The sample will
include 676 people between the ages of 19 and 80
with the results
expected on February 1. In the event there is a
happy ending, Cuba will
have its own vaccine available to the population
in the first quarter
of 2021.
Things are moving at a steady and
accelerated pace. "What normally takes years has
been achieved in just
under three months," says Finlay's Director
Vicente Vérez
Bencomo. In the phase of pharmaceutical
development and preclinical
studies in animals it presented low risks, few
uncertainties and
encouraging results." Based on these initial
indicators, on July 28 the
vaccine was tested on three of its researchers,
who also presented a
high immune response.
That Cuba is marching, once
again, at the forefront in the scientific-health
field is the result of
long accumulated experience in preventive
medicine, mass immunization
and the development of a biotechnology industry of
undeniable
international prestige. Since the triumph of the
Revolution in 1959,
professional training was promoted by the
universities and a Scientific
Hub was created with the aim of combining research
with production.
The development of vaccines is one of its most
significant
achievements: Cuba produces eight of the 11
vaccines used in its
national immunization program, which has over 98
per cent coverage and,
of course, is free and universal. The first
vaccination campaign was
carried out in 1962, resulting in Cuba becoming
the first country to
eradicate polio. Another of its milestones was to
achieve, in 1990, its
own vaccine against Hepatitis-B which led to the
practical
disappearance of the disease. A noteworthy fact is
that the Cuban
medical research platform, consisting of 32 state
companies with more
than 10,000 workers dedicated to the production of
medicines and
vaccines, is made up of mostly women.
Sovereignty,
the Byword
Achieving a 100 per cent national
vaccine in a country with great economic
limitations -- mainly due to
the United States blockade -- is of vital
importance. President Miguel
Díaz-Canel highlighted the concept that
distinguishes
"Soberana 01" and for which it is named:
"The name
of the vaccine reflects the feeling of patriotism
and the revolutionary
and humanist commitment with which the work
embodied in it was carried
out. Exploits like these reaffirm our pride in
being Cubans."
The policy of producing and applying vaccines is
only one leg
of a comprehensive health system that is an
example for the world. In
1959 Cuba had just 6,000 doctors and today it has
more than 100,000,
the highest number per inhabitant in Latin America
and one of the
highest globally. It is also the only country in
the region that has
eliminated severe child malnutrition: none of the
146 million
underweight children living in the world today are
Cuban.
The
emphasis on preventive medicine has also been key
to controlling the
coronavirus. After almost six months of a
pandemic, Cuba registers just
over 4,000 infections and 100 deaths -- one of the
lowest mortality
rates in the world, with eight deaths per million
inhabitants (the
highest is Peru with 871).
The island's health
education has as its universal bastion the Latin
American School of
Medicine (ELAM), which has graduated 7,248 doctors
from 45 countries in
20 years, including about 200 from the United
States.
That
internationalist solidarity is perhaps the main
hallmark of the Cuban
model. The medical brigades, which have been
deployed around the world
for six decades, have put heart and soul into all
the natural disasters
and epidemics (from the 1960 earthquake in Chile
to Ebola in Africa).
Before the pandemic, there were about 30 thousand
health workers
providing services in 61 countries. They were
joined by 46 brigades
that left this year to collaborate in the fight
against COVID-19. So
the proposal that has been gaining momentum, to
award the Nobel Peace
Prize to the "army of white coats" -- as Fidel
Castro called them --
does not sound off-base at all.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
Venezuela
![](../images2020/LatAmCaribbean/Venezuela/200908-VenezuelaMaduraSpeaktoElectionsPatrioticPole-PSUVcr.jpg)
President
Nicolás Maduro on September 8, 2020, speaks about
the Great
Patriotic Pole's participation in the December
2020 elections.
Parliamentary elections in Venezuela for a new
National
Assembly are to be held on December 6. Voters will
elect 277 deputies
for the 2021-2026 period -- 110 more members than
the National Assembly
currently has. Registration of parties and
candidates that will contest
the election concluded on September 4, with 107
political organizations
participating, some as part of alliances. Just
over half the seats will
be filled by proportional representation and the
remainder by
first-past-the-post. A total of 14,400 candidate
nominations were
received.
The governing
United Socialist Party of Venezuela will be joined
by a number of
smaller parties in the Great Patriotic Pole. Five
opposition parties
will put forward their candidates as part of the
Democratic Alliance,
rejecting the call of the U.S.-financed fake
"president" Juan
Guaidó and a number of other opposition factions
to boycott
yet another election in favour of holding out for
"a violent shortcut"
to power, as a rival opposition leader put it.
This reveals an
opposition in disarray.
Another point of contention
dividing the U.S.-financed opposition can be seen
in the sharp
differences in their reactions and mutual
accusations in response to
President Nicolás Maduro's decision to grant a
pardon to 110
opposition politicians and other individuals
facing criminal charges,
to foster dialogue and reconciliation in the
country. Twenty of those
pardoned were members of the National Assembly
which since 2016 has
been in contempt of laws it is duty-bound to
uphold. Those individuals
are now free to stand for re-election.
Along with
releasing the results of the automated candidate
registration process,
the National Electoral Council issued a statement
rejecting the
interference of the United States government which
has imposed illegal
sanctions against its president, Indira Maira
Alfonzo, and one of its
directors. The statement made clear that the
electoral body rejected
any attempt of any foreign government to issue
orders to, impose
conditions on, or coerce its senior officials in
the performance of
their duties.
Advances towards holding successful
parliamentary elections are taking place at a time
there is heightened
concern over the possibility of a direct U.S.
military intervention, or
one launched by proxy forces, with those from
Colombia and Brazil most
often mentioned. Indications of this include the
constant
sabre-rattling towards Venezuela by Secretary of
State Mike Pompeo and
assorted U.S. Southcom generals and the
increasingly brutal U.S.
blockade aimed at completely suffocating Venezuela
economically.
Concern is also heightened by the state of
disarray in which the
opposition finds itself, the continuing presence
of the U.S. Navy near
the Venezuelan coast supposedly engaging in
routine "anti-narcotics"
patrols and exercises, and the illegal presence of
U.S. troops inside
Colombia, in open violation of the country's
constitution, allegedly to
advise and train Colombia's military in
counter-narcotics operations.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
Colombia
![](../images2020/LatAmCaribbean/Colombia/200911-ColombiaBogotoYouthprotest-HSBarretoCr.jpg)
Youth on the streets of
Bogotá protesting state terror and impunity,
September 11,
2020.
On September 7, after a hiatus of several
months and with
the COVID-19 pandemic still a very real threat --
Colombia has the
sixth highest number of cases worldwide -- members
of unions and
other social movements drove through the streets
of Bogotá
in a
caravan for life. The caravan protested the Duque
government's
anti-worker labour and pension reforms and other
punishing
austerity measures. Millions of workers have been
left destitute
and abandoned, without protection from the effects
of the
pandemic and its attendant economic crisis.
Other
demands of the caravan were that the state take
action to
stop what have become almost daily massacres of
social leaders
and former guerrilla members by paramilitary death
squads, and in
some cases by known or suspected government
security forces, and
that the government implement the peace accords
instead of
sabotaging them. As of September 9, it is reported
that 218 persons
were killed in 55 massacres since the beginning of
this year. The
gruesome record since the signing of the Peace
Agreement between
the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia and the
Colombian
state in 2016 is 240 unarmed former guerrillas and
1,000
social leaders killed in targeted assassinations.
The
demand for the government to stop the massacres
took on a
whole new dimension two days after the caravan.
Early on
September 9, Javier Ordóñez, a 46-year-old
engineer who was
finishing a law degree and drove taxi to support
his family, was
for unknown reasons tasered multiple times and
forcefully pinned
down in the street by police as he pleaded,
"Please, no more!" All of
it was
captured on video. Mr. Ordóñez was then taken to
a police station
where he was further tortured and beaten to death.
Many have
likened his brutal killing to that of George Floyd
in the U.S.
The reaction to his death was similar as well.
Large numbers of
outraged youth took to the streets, demanding an
end to police
brutality and for Javier Ordóñez's killers to be
brought to
justice. Demonstrations have been taking place in
Bogotá as
well
as Medellín, Cali, Manizales, Armenia, Pereira and
other
cities.
A number of buses and several police stations
known as Immediate Action Commands (CAI) were burned in Bogotá.
In
less than two days of protests 13 more people were
killed,
the vast majority in their teens and twenties,
shot by
police in Bogotá and the nearby municipality of
Soacha. Over
200
have been reported injured, with some estimates as
high as 400,
many with gunshot wounds. More than 100 have been
detained.
People's social media accounts quickly filled with
videos of
police shooting demonstrators as well as random
people as they
fired indiscriminately into the crowd. At times
men in civilian
clothes, some wearing hoods, can be seen shooting
alongside the
police and generally terrorizing neighbourhoods.
While some
protesters threw rocks at police, police were seen
throwing rocks
to smash the windows of people's apartments in
targeted
neighbourhoods.
In light of the most recent events,
as well as the ongoing
serious crisis gripping the country, there are
calls for mass
mobilizations. There is every indication that in
spite of the
difficult conditions -- COVID-19 still far from
controlled, a
severe economic crisis, and a long history of the
use of state
terror to drown in blood the striving of the
people for freedom,
democracy
and peace -- the Colombian people will rise to the
occasion. Family members and friends of those
killed and injured,
political personalities and organizations and many
others are speaking
out, denouncing the police and the government,
demanding to know who
gave the orders to shoot, and that those
responsible at the highest
levels be held to account. The youth in particular
have shown they are
in no mood to submit and continue to courageously
demonstrate, knowing
they do so at the risk of their lives.
On September
11 a large group of young people took over and
transformed the space around a burned-out police
station in one
neighbourhood into a space for art and culture. In
the ruins of a
station that for some had served as a torture
centre, they engaged in
performances of different types and set up an
outdoor "public
library" full of books. They said they did so to
pay homage to
those whose lives were taken in the previous two
days of police
terror and as a way to show what it is the youth,
who the
president of Colombia, his Defence Minister and
others of their
ilk call "vandals," are fighting for.
![](../images2020/LatAmCaribbean/Colombia/200911-ColombiaYouthTurnTortureCentreCulture-ColectivoDeAbogad@s-03cr.jpg) ![](../images2020/LatAmCaribbean/Colombia/200911-ColombiaYouthTurnTortureCentreCulture-ColectivoDeAbogad@s-01cr.jpg)
Youth
turn space around a burned-out police station into
a place of culture
and art.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
Chile
In Chile the youth and working people courageously
faced the
militarized carabinero police force day
after day
in mass actions from October last year through to
January 2020. Despite
many being killed and hundreds injured, these
massive and continuous
mobilizations resulted in an important partial
victory. Faced with the
very real possibility that his unpopular
government could be brought
down, President Sebastián Piñera agreed to hold a
national referendum on the people's longstanding
demand for a new
constitution. The current constitution was written
during the Pinochet
dictatorship and enshrines a host of neo-liberal
reforms imposed on the
people without their consent.
A national plebiscite
asking the people if they want a new constitution,
Yes or No? will
therefore take place on November 25. Most of those
who have been
fighting for the establishment of a constituent
assembly with citizens
empowered to draft their own new constitution have
taken up the
campaign for a Yes victory. They are also urging
electors to answer the
second question by opting for the first option,
the creation of a
"Constitutional Convention" made up entirely of
citizens elected
directly to participate in drafting a new
constitution, instead of the
government's second option of a "Mixed
Constitutional Convention," only
half of whose members would be directly-elected
citizens, the other
half being currently-sitting members of
Parliament.
What
many regard as a "trap" in the process is that the
government has
stipulated that in order for a new draft
constitution to be adopted it
must be approved by a two-thirds majority in the
national legislature.
That is an obstacle the people are going all out
to overcome even as
the pandemic, which has hit Chile very hard, has
made campaigning more
difficult than usual. Chile has the 11th highest
number of total cases
in the world and a higher number of deaths per
100,000 population than
the U.S.
Serving as a poignant reminder of the need
to do away with the vestiges of the cruel Pinochet
era that remain in
the country's constitution, a procession on
September 11 marked the
47th anniversary of the U.S.-backed coup d'état of
1973.
Relatives and friends of the disappeared were
joined by many others in
a march through the streets of Santiago to honour
the late President
Salvador Allende and all those killed during and
after the coup and to
demand justice for the many victims whose
whereabouts are still unknown.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
Bolivia
![](../images2020/LatAmCaribbean/Bolivia/200714-BoliviaLaPaz-Mass-Demonstration2-teleSUR.png)
Mass demonstration in La
Paz, July 14, 2020, against the Áñez government. (TeleSUR)
The campaign is finally on for the long overdue
Bolivian
general election originally set for May 3, then
postponed three times
by the coup government of "interim president"
Jeanine
Áñez on the basis that the conditions did not
permit it going forward during the pandemic.
Finally, in the face of
massive street protests by the organized people
furious that their
right to elect a president and government of their
choosing continued
to be blocked, Áñez agreed to the demand of the
Plurinational Legislative Assembly that October 18
be guaranteed as the
date for the election with no further
postponements. Both chambers of
the Assembly are controlled by the Movement Toward
Socialism (MAS),
whose leader Evo Morales was prevented from
assuming the presidency
after being democratically re-elected last
October, by the
U.S.-orchestrated military coup that installed
Áñez in his place.
On
September 6, under the banner "Vamos a salir
adelante" ("We
will overcome"), MAS launched its campaign with a
large vehicle rally
in the city of Santa Cruz led by its presidential
candidate Luis Arce,
former Minister of the Economy under Evo Morales.
"We are beginning the
campaign to restore democracy and give the
Bolivian people economic,
political and social stability," Arce said. "This
caravan is endless.
The people of Bolivia are fed up with the
right-wing parties and want
to once again have a peaceful country for all
Bolivians, inclusive,
with economic stability, which only we guarantee."
Vice presidential
candidate and former Foreign Minister, David
Choquehuanca, kicked off
the campaign in the combative working class city
El Alto with an
ancestral Aymara ceremony. He said re-electing the
MAS would allow a
new stage in the transformation of Bolivia to go
forward, in which
mistakes made in the first stage will be corrected
and new leaders
promoted.
The U.S.-linked coup forces, themselves
far from united, have several candidates in the
running for president
and are scrambling to find the way to prolong
their illegitimate,
dictatorial rule. They have persecuted, jailed and
laid trumped-up
charges against as many MAS leaders and activists
who remain in the
country as possible, and opened judicial processes
for invented crimes
against others, including Luis Arce. They wasted
no time after usurping
power in spuriously accusing Evo Morales of
"terrorism" to prevent him
from returning to Bolivia from Argentina where he
has been living as a
refugee. On September 7, one day after the
election campaign opened in
Bolivia, he was disqualified from running as a
candidate to the Senate
for the Department of Cochabamba by a
constitutional court in La Paz.
Evo's response came in a tweet, "History shows
that they will be able
to disqualify Evo, but they will not be able to
outlaw the people."
![Haut de page](top.gif)
Ecuador
On September 6, a
Court of Cassation of the National Court of
Justice of Ecuador issued a
ruling prohibiting former President Rafael Correa
being a candidate of
the Citizen's Revolution movement for Vice
President. He had previously
been convicted in absentia, and without
evidence,
of accepting bribes during his time in office, and
sentenced to an
eight-year prison term, effectively barring his
return to Ecuador from
Belgium where he currently resides. Other former
members of his
government, including Vice President Jorge Glas
who won re-election
alongside the current president, Lenín Moreno in
2017, were
imprisoned and sentenced on dubious grounds for
"corruption" after
Moreno abandoned the program both were elected on
and hitched Ecuador
firmly to the U.S./IMF chariot. One day after the
ruling came down
against Rafael Correa, Paola Pabón, prefect for
the Province
of Pichincha and also a member of the Citizen's
Revolution, had to
appear in court for a review of the conditions of
her house arrest. She
is charged with "rebellion" for her political
stands and was held in
preventive detention before winning release to
house arrest.
It
can be seen that lawfare is alive and well and
being applied with a
vengeance in Latin America. It was wielded in the
most corrupt and
spectacular manner against former President Lula
da Silva to prevent
him from running and surely winning the presidency
of Brazil in 2018.
It continues to be used against many others whom
the U.S. imperialists
have given themselves the right to remove or
prevent from holding high
political office in countries it considers its
"back yard." Today,
several of the many "cases" used to condemn Lula,
without evidence, are
unravelling and the foreign-tutored judges and
prosecutors who
conspired together against him are falling into
disgrace. The same is
bound to happen with others subjected to this type
of warfare as the
peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean step up
the battle for their
democratic rights, against the forces of the Old,
and for the new
arrangements they require to provide a future for
themselves without
poverty, racism, colonialism or war.
![Haut de page](top.gif)
(To
access articles individually click on the black
headline.)
PDF
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|