July 25, 2020 - No. 27
The Need to Renew Democracy
The Fight for Societies that
Uphold the Rights of All
Private Banks Profit from
Pandemic Measures
in the U.S. and Canada
• Paying
the Big Banks to Do Government Work
• Big
Banks Reaping Hefty Fees from U.S. and
Canadian Pandemic Programs
Alberta Premier's Latest Economic Plan
• Massive
Transfer
of Public Funds to the Wealthiest Investors
- Dougal MacDonald -
Actions in U.S. Continue
• Strike
For Black Lives
• City
Council in Asheville, North Carolina Calls for
Reparations
• Reparation
Measures
Adopted in California,
Rhode Island and Illinois
Day of Rage Against
Annexation of Palestinian Land
• Vigorous
Action
in Windsor
• Vancouver
Stands
with Palestine
The Battle for Democracy in Bolivia
• Cuba
Makes Its La Paz Clinic Available to the
Bolivian People
- Cuban Ministry of
Foreign Affairs -
• People's
Forces
Battle for Their Democratic Rights
- Margaret Villamizar -
Important Anniversaries
• "Moncada
Taught
Us to Turn Setbacks into Victories"
- Fidel Castro -
Private Banks Profit from Pandemic
Measures in the U.S. and Canada
During the economic crisis and even during
"normal" times governments are paying the big
banks to do public sector work as a matter of
course. The banks and other financial institutions
and their rich owners profit handsomely from fees
for administering government borrowing and other
tasks. None of the work they do for governments,
including the lending to them of money, could
rightly be considered something in the realm of
private enterprise but rather "legal" corruption
to pay the rich which is in fact criminal in
nature.
In the imperialist
world, powerful private interests have usurped the
state and profit at the expense of the people.
Governments are used by these powerful private
interests to borrow from the rich to pay the rich
and in the process the private banks of the rich
seize the role of administering the scams for
which they are paid fat fees by the very same
governments that borrow from the rich to pay the
rich.
Paying the big private banks to do work that in
fact should belong in the public service is a
major problem facing the people and their society.
It is a call for the people to organize for
renewal and set a new direction for the economy.
Private banks have long since seized functions
that belong in the public sector. They escape the
control of a public authority which no longer
exists, including when it comes to the issuing of
new money and deciding which projects merit
investments.
The private financial institutions expropriate
interest profit from the economy greatly weakening
any development that favours the people and
blocking a path forward to a new pro-social
direction for the economy and governance. They
take money out of the economy and invest it
globally according to their narrow private
interests. No social or natural problem can be
resolved when the public finances are robbed in
this manner.
In the modern era, banking itself should be a
public service organized for the betterment of all
and nation-building not parasitic private
expropriation of social wealth the working people
produce and need. Functions such as banking and
investing in development projects, infrastructure
and in the basic sectors should be under public
control, with new forms that allow the people to
decide the direction of the economy and to
participate in making the decisions on major
investments and development and other matters of
concern related to the well-being of the people
and nation-building. The necessity has arisen to
bring public finances under the control of the
people and accountable to the public.
Handing government
fees to private banks to administer public
programs which serve private anti-social aims, in
ways similar to the WE Charity scandal, and paying
the rich in general from public funds, is yet
another example of how private interests have
seized control of governments to enrich themselves
and their private enterprises. Government
resources are used to prop up private business
instead of investing in public enterprise for the
benefit and stability this brings and for the
security and good of all. Canada and the U.S. need
a new pro-social direction including public banks
under the control of the people and held to
account for their actions.
In the present crisis, governments are paying
large fees to the big banks to administer public
pandemic handouts to private businesses. For the
banks, the fees are a blessing as other revenue
from investments has shrunk with bankruptcies and
bad loans on the increase, especially among
smaller businesses. Apart from hefty profits,
government fees to administer the payouts allow
the private banks to meet their regular
expenditures for rent and electricity etc, retain
staff and continue their private businesses. These
payouts to private enterprises and fees to private
banks have become normal practices to prop up an
economic system that has run its course and needs
a new direction.
Up to $24.6 Billion Paid in Fees So Far
Many Canadian financial institutions operate
throughout the United States of North American
Oligopolies. Four of the largest Canadian banks
are profiting from both U.S. and Canadian
government fees paid to administer state pandemic
payments to private businesses. The U.S.
government has contracted the subsidiaries of
Canadian banks among others to administer public
loans through the Paycheck Protection Program
(PPP) launched by the U.S. Small Business
Administration.
The PPP has the authority to hand out $660 billion
in loans to private enterprises. Rather than have
a public service do the job, including public
banks, the U.S. government offers the big private
banks processing fees of up to five per cent to
administer the loans for two to three years with
the fees paid throughout the period. U.S. and
Canadian banks have collectively handled $520
billion through the PPP so far both administering
the loans and collecting government fees for
themselves.
Toronto-Dominion Bank has been the most active
Canadian bank. Its U.S. arm, TD Bank, has already
racked up processing fees of $238 million to $398
million so far this year. The fees are estimates
only as they have not yet been fully acknowledged
or made public. TD Bank has administered PPP loans
worth at least $8.2 billion and as much as $12.1
billion through its extensive retail banking
network across the eastern United States.
BMO Harris Bank, a subsidiary of Bank of
Montreal, has collected between $91 million and
$175 million in fees.
The Royal Bank of Canada's wholly-owned City
National Bank is estimated to have taken in $89
million to $177 million in fees.
CIBC Bank USA, the U.S. arm of the Canadian
Imperial Bank of Commerce has collected anywhere
from $29 million to $64 million in fees.
When PPP funds are
disbursed to businesses, the banks receive a
processing fee of five per cent for loans under
$350,000, three per cent for loans from $350,000
to $2 million, and one per cent for loans of more
than $2 million. The estimates for fees are based
on possible ranges for PPP loans as the U.S.
government data only provide exact amounts for
loans of less than $150,000.
The size of the fees paid to the big U.S. banks
handing out funds from the PPP are estimated to be
between $14.3 billion and $24.6 billion so far.
These billions of dollars in fees have drawn
criticism, especially the amounts seized by the
three largest U.S. banks -- JPMorgan Chase &
Co., Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo,
although the amount taken by the TD Bank does not
lag far behind those big three.
The private banks argue they need the large fees
to cover their costs of administration with Bank
of Montreal spokesperson Paul Gammal going so far
as to say, supposedly with a straight face, that
the banks need the fat fees "to help support our
increased charitable giving and ongoing commitment
to minority-owned businesses and underserved
neighbourhoods." The propagation of charities has
become a preferred sanctimonious self-serving
pursuit of the imperialist oligarchy. They preach
the gospel of philanthropy using their own vast
private wealth and control of the people's
collective wealth to displace all government-run
social programs and public services. Charities are
both a form and ideology used to block any
tendency towards the people's control over the
economy and a new pro-social direction to stop
paying the rich and increase investments in social
programs, public services and public enterprises
under the control of the working people.
Fees from the Canadian Government
In Canada, the total fees doled out so far to
private banks and credit unions administering the
Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA) are
estimated at $110 million. The government through
CEBA has to date handed out business loans worth
$27.6 billion to thousands of private enterprises.
The CEBA program allows businesses to borrow up to
$40,000 interest-free until the end of 2022, with
one quarter of the loan forgivable. Banks are paid
0.4 per cent of the outstanding balance of each
CEBA loan per year. Whatever the private banks
receive in administration fees for public programs
props up their private enterprises and control of
the economy.
Alberta Premier's Latest Economic
Plan
- Dougal MacDonald -
Demonstration outside the UCP policy convention,
Calgary, November 30, 2019, opposed
Kenny government's neo-liberal cuts to social
programs.
On June 29, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney
announced the components of his latest "economic
recovery plan." This was supposedly based on the
findings of the premier's Economic Recovery
Council, composed of various corporate hacks,
including former Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
There is nothing new in the plan; it is the same
old neo-liberal nonsense that the United
Conservative Party and similar governments all
over the world have peddled for decades. In
essence, it is "trickle down" economics, the idea
that increasing the profits of the corporations
will somehow result in more wealth making its
way down to ordinary working people. This has
long been exposed as a complete lie, yet the
Kenneys of this world continue to promote it as
the solution to our economic ills.
Certainly, there is a need for a comprehensive
economic plan in Alberta but this latest mish-mash
proposed by Kenney just will not do. It is just
one more pay-the-rich scheme which will further
damage the economy rather than start to rebuild
it. It has nothing to do with consulting the
people of Alberta or involving them in important
decision-making and everything to do with adding
to the profits of the private foreign corporations
that control Alberta's economy and Kenney's
government. The fact that the plan is the same
old, same old is indicated by its two main and
tired components, corporate tax cuts and
infrastructure spending.
The corporate tax
cuts component of Kenney's recovery plan is a
further cut from 10 per cent to 8 per cent. This
follows Kenney's initial cut from 12 per cent to
10 per cent. Note that under Conservative Ralph
Klein the rate was 15.5 per cent or almost twice
what Kenney has now set it at! Further, Kenney
seems to be the only person left in the world
still peddling the myth that corporate tax cuts
attract investment and create jobs. In contrast,
the general consensus among financial experts is
that corporate tax cuts make corporations richer
by increasing the huge amount of cash they sit on.
Also, make no mistake, the energy corporations
still have plenty of cash. For example, Imperial
Oil reports it had a cash balance of $1.4 billion
at the end of the first quarter of 2020 and, in
its own words, "strong liquidity."
Experience shows that corporations will use the
money they save by the tax cut, not to create
jobs, but mainly to buy back their own stock,
greatly enriching the shareholders, including
upper management who often have large holdings.
For example, in January 2019, Murray Edwards, CEO
and founder of oilsands giant CNRL, held almost 22
million shares of the company, currently worth
about half-a-billion dollars. Shareholder
enrichment is what occurred in the U.S. after
Trump's 2017 tax cut. CNN reported on August 22,
2019: "The 2017 corporate tax cut left U.S.
businesses flush with cash. S&P 500 companies
responded by rewarding shareholders with record
amounts of buybacks in 2018, with each quarter
setting an all-time high." Instead of enriching
workers corporate tax cuts will only further
enrich the owners of capital.
It is also well-known that many corporations
already pay little or no tax anyway through such
tax-dodging strategies as shifting profits to
foreign subsidiaries, accelerating depreciation,
and giving stock options to employees. As well,
the corporations take advantage of every "legal"
loophole in the tax laws to use strategies such as
sheltering their money in offshore accounts, as
revealed by the "Panama Papers" in 2016. According
to Revenue Canada, in 2014 (latest available
figures), Canadian companies managed to avoid
paying up to $11.4 billion worth of taxes they
should have paid in that single tax year. And when
all else fails, a corporation can simply declare
bankruptcy and walk away from all its financial
responsibilities, for example, stiffing landowners
and leaving orphan wells in a mess.
As for the infrastructure component of
Kenney's latest scheme, he boasts that this year
Alberta will spend $10 billion on such projects,
supposedly creating 32,000 to 50,000 jobs. No
evidence is given for this jobs claim and no
mention is made of the thousands of jobs the
Kenney government has already destroyed, nor of
the fact that jobs constructing infrastructure are
temporary. There is also no mention of the fact
that what infrastructure spending really entails
is the financial oligarchy lending money to
governments and then profiting from the government
projects and payouts many times over. Much of the
economic activity is arranged through government
contracts to global cartels, often in the form of
public-private partnership (P3) agreements where
public governments take the risk and private
foreign corporations reap the profits.
Edmonton's $1.8 billion Light Rapid Transit
Valley Line SE is a prime example of such a P3. In
2016, TransEd Partners was selected to design,
build and operate the Valley Line SE. The private
partners in TransEd are Bechtel (U.S.), EllisDon
(Ontario), Bombardier (Quebec), Fengate Capital
Management (Ontario), Arup Canada (London,
England) and IBI Group (Ontario). Bechtel, the
lead contractor, is a huge enterprise, notorious
for its close involvement with the U.S.
government, particularly the Department of Defense
and the CIA. Its executives Casper Weinberger and
George Schultz served as Secretary of Defense and
Secretary of State respectively under former
President Ronald Reagan. Bechtel co-founder John
McCone headed the CIA from 1961-65 at the height
of the Cold War.
Nowhere, however, does Kenney explain where that
$10 billion for the infrastructure projects will
come from, certainly not out of his back pocket.
As has been previously pointed out, it is borrowed
from the financial oligarchy and then a portion is
put toward financing infrastructure projects. This
becomes the seed money to begin construction.
Private construction cartels are financed by the
money the government borrows, which includes
allowance for a healthy profit. Everything is
guaranteed by the government including the
exorbitant prices the private construction cartels
charge to complete the projects. Once built, the
big private enterprises are the main users of the
infrastructure, e.g., roads, bridges, electricity,
for which they are charged lower concocted
"industrial rates."
Albertans are "directed and browbeaten not to
object to this direction for the economy, as it
'provides jobs and the infrastructure.' ... But a
new direction is exactly what is needed to bring
the economy under the control of the people who do
the work and prevent recurring crises and solve
other social and natural problems. A new direction
for the economy would prohibit government
borrowing from private institutions. A new
direction would construct, maintain and manage
public infrastructure using permanent public
construction enterprises. It would ensure that the
value from the infrastructure is fully realized by
the public and private enterprises that use and
consume the value and that this value would be
poured back into the economy and not be taken out
by the rich to some tax haven or other faraway
place."[1]
Note
1. See "Public
Infrastructure
Spending Programs to Pay the Rich and Sustain
Class Privilege and Control," by K.C. Adams,
TML Weekly, June 27, 2020.
Actions in U.S. Continue
Teamsters, Brooklyn, New York.
"Even before George
Floyd's life was so horrifically taken, the
'normal' everyone keeps talking about going back
to wasn't working for us. From racially
motivated attacks to being forced to go to work
without protective equipment or hazard pay in
the name of the economy, our lives have not been
valued. We cannot go back to that.
We must move forward."
- Glen Brown,
Airport Wheelchair Attendant,
j20strikeforblacklives.org
On July 20 over 60 unions and social justice
organizations organized a strike of essential
workers in cities across the U.S. Workers walked
off their jobs and took to the streets to demand
an end to racism, police impunity and "business as
usual" as part of a nationwide "Strike for Black
Lives." Tens of thousands of people with
front-line jobs in health care, transportation,
food services and other sectors staged walkouts
and protests throughout the day.
The action call read:
"This is a moment to transform our economy and
democracy but until we dismantle racism and white
supremacy, we cannot win economic, climate or
immigration justice. On July 20, workers demand:
"1. Justice for
Black communities, with an unequivocal declaration
that Black Lives Matter, is a necessary first step
to winning justice for all workers. To win higher
wages, better jobs, and Unions for All, we must
ensure that Black workers can build economic
power. To win Healthcare for All, we must address
disparities in accessibility and quality of care.
Action on climate change must center communities
of color. Immigrant communities stand in
solidarity with Black workers to build power
together. Education, housing, and criminal justice
reform must start by listening to Black workers
and leaders. We will support and align with
Black-led organizations and their demands.
"2. Elected officials and candidates at every
level use their executive, legislative, and
regulatory authority to begin to rewrite the rules
and reimagine our economy and democracy so that
Black communities can thrive. They must ensure
fair and safe voting in-person and by mail so
everyone can fully participate in our democracy.
As we continue to address the COVID-19 pandemic,
we must protect the health and safety of all
workers, returning people to work and into public
spaces with a rational, safe, well-managed plan
designed with workers and community stakeholders.
"3. Corporations take immediate action to
dismantle racism, white supremacy, and economic
exploitation wherever it exists, including in our
workplaces. This includes corporations raising
wages, allowing workers to form unions, providing
healthcare, sick leave and expanded healthcare
coverage to people who are uninsured or have lost
coverage as the result of losing their jobs during
the COVID-19 pandemic, child care support and
more, to disrupt the multigenerational cycle of
poverty created by their anti-worker attacks.
Workers must have ample personal protective
equipment (PPE) and have a voice in the plan to
create safe workplaces during and after the
pandemic.
"4. Every worker has the opportunity to form a
union, no matter where they work. Every worker in
America must have the freedom that comes from
economic security and equity in opportunity. We
demand the immediate implementation of a $15/hour
minimum wage, fully-funded healthcare coverage and
paid sick leave for all."
"All over the United States, farmworkers, nurses'
aides, hotel housekeepers, Uber, delivery, truck
and bus drivers, airport cabin cleaners, Amazon
warehouse workers, Walmart associates, and more
walked off the job to demand an end to police
violence against Black people and call on
companies to move beyond tweeting that Black Lives
Matter and take real action to improve Black
lives," organizers said.
Photo Review
Massachusetts
Connecticut
Hartford, Connecticut
Edison, New Jersey
Trenton, New Jersey
New Jersey
New York City
Long Island, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Toledo, Ohio
Washington, DC
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Iowa
St. Louis, Missouri
Chicago, Illinois
Detroit, Michigan
Durham, North Carolina
Memphis, Tennessee
Houston, Texas
Oakland, California
Los Angeles, California
San Francisco, California
Seattle, Washington
Yakima Valley, Washington
Demand for reparations painted on a street in
Richmond, Virginia, June 2020.
On July 14, Asheville, North Carolina City
Council passed a resolution that apologized for
the city's historic role in slavery and the
discrimination and violation of rights of African
Americans in the period that followed the end of
slavery in 1863 to the present.[1] It also called
for reparations in the form of investments in
areas where Black residents face disparities (see
full resolution below).
"Hundreds of years of Black blood spilled that
basically fills the cup we drink from today," said
Councilman Keith Young, an African American and
the measure's chief proponent, who noted that
simply removing statues is not enough.
Asheville City Council's resolution comes amidst
the ongoing demands across the U.S. to end racial
injustice, including thousands who protested in
Asheville calling for redirecting funding for
police toward social programs.
Reparations for slavery are a longstanding demand
across the U.S. that is receiving renewed
attention and impetus from the nationwide protests
following the unjust police killing of George
Floyd.
Resolution Supporting Community Reparations for
Black Asheville
WHEREAS, Black People have been unjustly
Enslaved; and
WHEREAS, Black People have been unjustly
Segregated; and
WHEREAS, Black People have been unjustly
Incarcerated; and
WHEREAS, Black People have been denied housing
through racist practices in the private realty
market, including redlining, steering,
blockbusting, denial of mortgages, and
gentrification; and
WHEREAS, Black People have been denied housing,
displaced and inadequately housed by government
housing policies that include discriminatory
VA/FHA practices, Urban Renewal, and a variety of
local and federal "affordable" housing programs;
and
WHEREAS, Black People have been consistently and
widely impoverished by discriminatory wages paid
in every sector of the local economy regardless of
credentials and experience; and
WHEREAS, Black People have experienced
disproportionate unemployment rates and reduced
opportunities to fully participate in the local
job market; and
WHEREAS, Black People have been systematically
excluded from historic and present private
economic development and community investments
and, therefore, black-owned businesses have not
received the benefits of these investments; and
WHEREAS, Black People have been segregated from
mainstream education and within present day school
programs that include AG, AP, and Honors; and
WHEREAS, Black students have experienced the
denial of education through admission, retention
and graduation rates of every level of education
in WNC and through discriminatory disciplinary
practices; and
WHEREAS, Black People historically and presently
receive inadequate, if not detrimental, health
care as exemplified by disproportionate
morbidities and mortality rates that result from
the generational trauma of systemic racism,
discriminatory treatment by medical professionals,
and discriminatory medical practices such as
involuntary sterilizations, denial of adequate
testing, denial of preventative and curative
procedures; and
WHEREAS, Black People have been unjustly targeted
by law enforcement and criminal justice
procedures, incarcerated at disproportionate rates
and subsequently excluded from full participation
in the benefits of citizenship that include
voting, employment, housing and health care; and
WHEREAS, Black People have disproportionately
been forced to reside in, adjacent to, or near
Brown Zones and other toxic sites that negatively
impact their health and property; and
WHEREAS, Black People have disproportionately
been limited to the confined routes of travel
provided by public transportation; and
WHEREAS, Black People have disproportionately
suffered from the isolation of food deserts and
childcare deserts;
WHEREAS, systemic racism was created over
centuries and will take time to dismantle;
WHEREAS, state and federal governments have a
responsibility to adopt programs, policies, and
funding to address reparations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASHEVILLE THAT:
The City Council of the City of Asheville:
(1) apologizes and makes amends for its
participation in and sanctioning of the
Enslavement of Black People;
(2) apologizes and makes amends for its
enforcement of segregation and its accompanying
discriminatory practices;
(3) apologizes and makes amends for carrying out
an urban renewal program that destroyed multiple,
successful black communities;
(4) calls on other organizations and institutions
in Asheville that have advanced and benefitted
from racial inequity to join the city in its
apologies and invites them to address racism
within their own structures and programs and to
work with the city to more comprehensively address
systemic racism;
(5) calls on the State of North Carolina and the
federal government to initiate policymaking and
provide funding for reparations at the state and
national levels;
(6) directs the City Manager to establish a
process within the next year to develop short,
medium and long term recommendations to
specifically address the creation of generational
wealth and to boost economic mobility and
opportunity in the black community;
(7) fully supports its equity department, staff
and its work, and encourages the city manager to
utilize their talents when forming policy and
programs that will establish the creation of
generational wealth and address reparations due in
the black community as mentioned above;
(8) seeks to establish within the next year, a
new commission empowered to make short, medium and
long term recommendations that will make
significant progress toward repairing the damage
caused by public and private systemic Racism.
Other local government community organizations may
also be invited to have representation on the
Commission. The task of the Community Reparations
Commission is to issue a report in a timely manner
for consideration by the City and other
participating community groups for incorporation
into their respective short and long term
priorities and plans. Accountability for achieving
equity will be enforced in the appropriate
offices. The report and the resulting budgetary
and programmatic priorities may include but not be
limited to increasing minority homeownership and
access to other affordable housing, increasing
minority business ownership and career
opportunities, strategies to grow equity and
generational wealth, closing the gaps in health
care, education, employment and pay, neighborhood
safety and fairness within criminal justice;
(9) calls on the city manager to give, at
minimum, a bi-annual update to the city council on
the progress of work performed pursuant to this
resolution.
Read, approved and adopted this 14th day of
July, 2020.
Note
1. Asheville is located in
Buncombe County. According to 1860 census records,
Buncombe County had 1,907 enslaved people who were
"owned" by 283 enslavers, of whom 54 owned 10 or
more enslaved people.
The number of enslaved people in North Carolina
increased from 100,783 in 1790 to 351,059 in 1860,
about one-third of the state's population. The
percentage of population that was slaves varied by
county. There were 19 counties in 1860 where the
slave population was greater than the free white
population in 1860. These counties were in
agricultural areas producing cotton, tobacco, rice
and naval stores and where larger plantations and
farms existed in the coastal plains, Piedmont, and
counties bordering Virginia.
Segregation was officially in practice until the
1960s for North Carolina's Indigenous peoples and
1970s for the Black population.
California
In California in June, a bill creating a task
force to develop reparation proposals for African
Americans was passed in the State Assembly and is
now being considered by the Senate. The
Legislative Counsel's Digest of the bill reads:
"Existing law requests the Regents of the
University of California to assemble a colloquium
of scholars to draft a research proposal to
analyze the economic benefits of slavery that
accrued to owners and the businesses, including
insurance companies and their subsidiaries, that
received those benefits, and to make
recommendations to the Legislature regarding those
findings.
"Existing law
requires the Insurance Commissioner to request and
obtain information from insurers licensed and
doing business in this state regarding any records
of slaveholder insurance policies issued by any
predecessor corporation during the slavery era.
Existing law requires insurers to research and
report to the commissioner on insurance policies
that provided coverage for injury to, or death of,
enslaved people.
"This bill would establish the Task Force to
Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African
Americans, Americans who are descendants of
persons enslaved in the United States, consisting
of 8 members, appointed as provided. The bill
would require the Task Force to, among other
things, identify, compile, and synthesize the
relevant corpus of evidentiary documentation of
the institution of slavery that existed within the
United States and the colonies. The bill would
require the Task Force to recommend, among other
things, the form of compensation that should be
awarded, the instrumentalities through which it
should be awarded, and who should be eligible for
this compensation. The bill would require the Task
Force to submit a written report of its findings
and recommendations to the Legislature. The bill
would authorize reimbursement of the members'
expenses only to the extent an appropriation is
made in the Budget Act. The bill would
state that any state level reparations authorized
under these provisions are not to be considered a
replacement for any reparations enacted at the
federal level. The bill would repeal these
provisions on July 1, 2023."
Rhode Island
In Providence, Rhode Island, on July 15, Mayor
Jorge Elorza signed an executive order to pursue a
"truth-telling and reparations process." The Providence
Journal reported: "The process in
Providence, Elorza said, will start with members
of his administration and a group of
African-American advisers meeting with historical
societies and researchers to come up with a plan
for sharing the state's role throughout history in
the institution of slavery, genocide of Indigenous
people, forced assimilation and seizure of land.
The history could be shared through methods such
as exhibitions, community conversations and guest
speakers, he said.
"City leaders will also review local and state
laws as part of this process, particularly those
that result in discrimination against Black and
Indigenous people in the public and private
sectors, according to the city.
"The city will then engage in a broad community
conversation on the state's history and the ways
in which historical injustices and systemic racism
continue to affect society today.
"Determining what form reparations will take will
be the last step of the process."
Illinois
In Illinois the process of reparations began in
2019. The city of Evanston's website states:
"The City of Evanston's reparations planning
process began in June 2019 following the City
Council's adoption of a resolution affirming the
City's commitment to end structural racism and
achieve racial equity. The City Council's Equity
and Empowerment Commission held two community
meetings to gather public input on reparations in
July, and summarized input and recommendations in
a report to the City Council. In September, the
Council accepted the Equity and Empowerment
Commission's report and authorized the creation of
a City Council subcommittee to begin the planning
process.
"In November, a Reparations Fund was created and
adopted a resolution as part of the City's 2020
Budget. The City Council committed to utilize tax
revenue collected from sales of recreational
cannabis to support reparations in Evanston.
"Following the City Council's adoption of the
2020 Budget, Ald. Robin Rue Simmons hosted a
Reparations Town Hall Meeting at First Church of
God in Evanston on December 11. Actor,
humanitarian and Ambassador for the United Nations
International Decade for People of African Descent
Danny Glover was the keynote presenter.
Representatives from the National African American
Reparations Commission (NAARC) also participated."
Day of Rage Against Annexation
of Palestinian Land
On July 18, Windsor youth and students held a
Day of Rage organized to oppose all attempts to
extinguish the rights of the Palestinian people
whether by annexation or through what is called
"negotiation."
Around 75 people rallied on the riverfront then
marched, shouting slogans, through downtown to
City Hall Square for speeches.
Four activists
addressed the crowd each emphasizing different
aspects of the fight for Palestinian human rights.
An organizer with the University of Windsor
Palestinian Solidarity Group opened by explaining
how Israel's attempts at unilateral annexation of
even more Palestinian territory than it has
already seized end any pretense that a two-state
solution is possible, saying that although it may
not seem clear yet, this opens the door to the
only democratic solution, which is one state with
equal rights for all.
A young woman activist rejected the attempts to
criminalize support for the rights of the
Palestinian people and did so in the context of
opposing colonialism in Canada against the
Indigenous peoples and national minorities. She
also condemned the criminality of the Israeli
occupation which labels the people who have been
dispossessed of their lands as terrorists and
threats. Meanwhile, those responsible for the
dispossession and occupation claim to be acting in
self-defence and in the interest of "security."
An activist of the Communist Party of Canada
(Marxist-Leninist) noted that the Israeli and
Canadian states have longstanding economic,
political and security ties and that these must be
ended in order for Canada to be able to contribute
to peace in the Middle East. She hailed the
initiative of the youth to call the rally noting
that a new generation of anti-imperialist youth
who are speaking and acting for themselves is
proof that the colonial project of the Israeli
state will not succeed and that the memory of the
Palestinian people cannot be extinguished. She
called on everyone to oppose any attempts to
criminalize opposition to Israeli state violence
as anti-Semitic, which governments in Canada at
all levels are doing.
The final speaker, an activist with the
Revolutionary Student Movement, explained that
their own entrance into political activism was
through joining the work to stand up for
Palestinian human rights at the University of
Windsor. They noted that many of the activists
they worked and stood shoulder to shoulder with
were of Palestinian origin, and this inspired them
to get involved in speaking out and actively
standing up to injustice as well.
On Sunday, July 12, student organizations in
Vancouver, including Solidarity for Palestinian
Human Rights at the University of British Columbia
(SPHR UBC), Independent Jewish Voices UBC and the
Arab Students Association, along with Vancouver
Allies, organized a demonstration outside the
Vancouver Art Gallery as part of the global "Day
of Rage" protests against Israeli annexation of
the occupied Palestinian West Bank. A number of
organizations participated in the protest,
including Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity
Network, Sulong UBC (a Filipino national
democratic student organization), the Canada
Palestine Association and BDS Vancouver.
Speakers highlighted the settler colonial nature
of the Israeli state and the Zionist project,
emphasizing the connections with settler
colonialism in Canada and the genocide of
Indigenous nations and the Canadian government's
decades of complicity with Zionist colonialism in
Palestine. Protesters emphasized that they were
part of a global movement against racism and
oppression. They demanded an end to Canadian
government support for Israeli occupation,
apartheid, settler colonialism and genocide.
They joined in
spirited chants for justice and liberation in
Palestine, raising Palestinian flags and signs
denouncing annexation.
Speaking on behalf of Sulong UBC, Lara Maestro
expressed solidarity with Palestinian student
prisoners in Israeli jails, highlighting the cases
of Mays Abu Ghosh, Tareq Mattar and Layan Kayed.
She also noted the ongoing solidarity between
liberation movements in Palestine and the
Philippines, highlighting the similarities between
the Netanyahu regime in Israel and the Duterte
regime in the Philippines.
Speakers representing SPHR UBC discussed
Palestinian identity, organizing and resistance
inside and outside Palestine, even as Palestinians
have faced over 70 years of ongoing Nakba -- and
ongoing resistance. The speaker representing
Independent Jewish Voices emphasized that Israel
is a colonial project, emphasizing support for
Palestinian and Indigenous resistance.
Charlotte Kates, the international coordinator of
Samidoun, spoke at the protest, focusing on the
situation of Palestinian political prisoners,
including the widespread use of torture by Israeli
interrogators, the arrest and imprisonment of
Palestinian children and the targeting of
Palestinian students.
She emphasized the global, anti-imperialist
nature of the Palestinian struggle and the
importance of standing and struggling together
with all movements confronting racism, imperialism
and oppression. She closed with the chant, "from
the river to the sea, Palestine will be free!"
On behalf of the Canada Palestine Association and
BDS Vancouver, Alan Roberts emphasized the ongoing
complicity of the Canadian government in Israeli
crimes, expressed solidarity with the Black
liberation movement and Indigenous struggles and
called for the boycott of Israel and complicit
corporations.
The event concluded with several cultural
performances, highlighting ongoing Palestinian
cultural resistance. Malak Musik sang Palestinian
national songs, while poets Diana and Luay
highlighted Palestinian experience, identity and
ongoing struggle through their powerful concluding
words.
The protest followed an earlier street picket
organized on June 26 by the Canada Palestine
Association and BDS Vancouver. Protesters lined up
at the crowded rush-hour intersection of Broadway
and Clark in Vancouver with large signs, banners
and Palestinian flags, chanting loudly and
denouncing Israeli annexation while demanding
justice and liberation for Palestine.
Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network
has called for Days of Resistance to continue
these actions between August 7-9 in cities and
communities around the world.
The Battle for Democracy in
Bolivia
- Cuban Ministry of Foreign
Affairs -
De facto authorities in Bolivia, on the
afternoon of July 21, publicly reported that the
building known as the "Clinica del Colaborador,"
owned by the Republic of Cuba, which was violently
raided by police on November 15, 2019, would be
made available, in the next few days, to treat
Bolivian citizens with COVID-19.
This unilateral
decision, which is presented as a humanitarian
act, constitutes a violation of the rights of the
Republic of Cuba as the legal owner of the
aforementioned property, preceded by disregard for
international law and an incessant campaign of
lies and distortions about Cuba, particularly
directed against the medical cooperation that our
country provided in Bolivia, a campaign that this
Ministry denounced in a statement, January 25,
2020.
It must be recalled that, in November of 2019,
Bolivian authorities, with the leadership and
support of the U.S. Embassy in La Paz, arrested
several Cuban health collaborators under false
pretenses and conducted searches and raids of
their homes, while publicly inciting violence
against our health personnel. This campaign has
not stopped and is being used for internal
electoral purposes.
The facility occupied by the Clinica del
Colaborador was purchased and expanded by the
Cuban State, in strict compliance with Bolivian
law. It is located at 163 22nd Street, on the
corner of Enrique Herson in the Achumani area of
the city of La Paz. In accordance with Resolution
0410 of April 4, 2007, the Bolivian Ministry of
Health, in accordance with the powers conferred by
Act No. 3351 of February 21, 2006, the Ministry
authorized the operation of the center to provide
care for Cuban professionals working in the health
and education sectors in the country.
The facility includes a 2-story house and a
3-story building. The small facility has 13
hospital beds, 6 for inpatient cases, 4 for
observation and 3 for intensive care. It was one
of the 158 health facilities where, by virtue of
the 1985 Scientific-Technical Cooperation
Agreement in the area of health between the
governments of Cuba and Bolivia, and its
subsequent updates, 18,015 Cuban health
professionals offered the sister Bolivian people
73,557,935 medical consultations, performed 1,533,016 surgeries, of which 727,138 were
ophthalmological, and assisted 60,792 births. As
part of this collaboration, 5,184 young Bolivians
have graduated from medical school in our country.
In Bolivia, Cuba's health collaborators provided
their services in 34 Community Integral Hospitals,
119 Community Integral Centers and 5
ophthalmologic centers, in nine departments, 28
provinces and 42 municipalities in the country.
Since the above-mentioned raid, Bolivian
authorities have arbitrarily denied personnel from
the Cuban embassy access to the Clinica del
Colaborador.
The Cuban government has demanded the immediate
restoration of its rights as the legitimate owner
of the aforementioned property, through diplomatic
notes No. 1079/20, from the Republic of Cuba's
Ministry of Foreign Relations, April 13, 2020; and
No. 26/20, dated June 18, 2020, from the Cuban
embassy in La Paz, respectively, to which no
response has been received
We have attentively followed the tragic events
the sister people of Bolivia are facing, suffering
more than 60,000 SARS-COV-2 infections and more
than 2,000 deaths from COVID-19, according to
official data. Bolivia's health system has not
been able [to] effectively confront the pandemic,
and is on the verge of collapse. Unfortunately,
doctors and health workers have been infected and
died, among them several young Bolivian graduates
of the Latin American School of Medicine (ELAM) in
Cuba, who have honorably done their duty.
In this context, many Bolivian organizations and
citizens have addressed Cuba, both publicly and
privately, requesting support from Cuban health
personnel and medicines that have proved effective
with COVID-19 patients. Many have noted the
contribution that would have been made by the
Cuban Medical Brigade that was providing services
in Bolivia before the coup, if it had been
present.
The generous Cuban people have not renounced
their altruistic vocation. Aware that the fight
against the COVID-19 pandemic requires urgent
joint efforts of cooperation and solidarity and,
without relinquishing ownership of the Clinica del
Colaborador property or our rights as the
legitimate owner, the Cuban government makes its
use available to the sister Bolivian people to
assist COVID-19 patients, as long as the crisis
situation generated by this pandemic continues in
Bolivia.
- Margaret Villamizar -
July 14, 2020 demonstration in La Paz, Bolivia.
Workers, women, and Indigenous peoples and their
organizations along with other social movements
have returned to the streets to demand an end to
the wrecking of the coup government and the right
to elect a president and government of their
choosing without further delay. Demonstrations are
being held especially in places where the workers
have fighting traditions, such as Cochabamba and
El Alto, a suburb of the capital city of La Paz.
Over the past nine months the coup government of
the self-proclaimed "interim" president Jeanine
Áñez has been busy ruling by decree, dismantling
longstanding national projects and public social
programs initiated by previous Movement Towards
Socialism-Political Instrument for the Sovereignty
of the Peoples (MAS-IPSP) governments led by
President Evo Morales. It is also engaging in
all-out persecution and revenge-taking against MAS
leaders, members and supporters. It did away with
the Plurinational State of Bolivia’s proudly
independent foreign policy in order to align
Bolivia with the hegemonic aims of its U.S.
masters for the country and the region. It
dutifully joined the Lima Group and the failed
U.S. campaign to do to Venezuela what it had just
done to Bolivia. It withdrew from the Bolivarian
Alliance for the Peoples of our America-People's
Trade Treaty (ALBA-TCP), expelled the Cuban
medical mission from the country at the worst
possible moment and suspended diplomatic relations
with Cuba.
It has also recently come to light that the coup
government obtained an "emergency" loan of
U.S.$327 million from the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) in April, supposedly to help it deal
with COVID-19 by covering medical expenses and
providing support for the most vulnerable. The
money, disbursed through the IMF's Rapid Financing
Instrument, came with a raft of conditions,
committing Bolivia to drastically reduce public
expenditures and to eventually "flexibilize" (i.e.
devalue) the country's currency. This package of
harsh measures is similar to those agreed to by
the neo-liberal government of then-President
Mauricio Macri in 2018 that sent Argentina's
economy into a tailspin and left large swathes of
the population unemployed and destitute. The IMF
loan to Bolivia, which has already been deposited
in the country's central bank, was obtained
illegally as it was done without the approval of
the Legislative Assembly as called for in
Bolivia's constitution. Only now, after the fact,
and with a "health bond" equivalent to around
U.S.$70 earmarked for the most vulnerable members
of Bolivian society hanging in the balance, is the
legislature being asked -- or more to the point,
being blackmailed -- to give the odious deal its
blessing. It remains to be seen how the
legislature, in which MAS holds two-thirds of the
seats, will respond. Information is also coming to
light of the corruption related to the use of
these funds.
Demonstrations Resume in Bolivia
La Paz, July 8, 2020.
Between March and June it was mainly doctors and
other hospital workers who protested in the
streets, blocking traffic in major cities to back
their demands that the coup government provide
them with urgently needed equipment to protect
themselves and to treat the growing number of
COVID-19 patients being seen in under-funded and
under-staffed hospitals. Associated Press reported
on July 8 that 50 per cent of Bolivia's doctors
had contracted the virus.
The first big protest since the pandemic hit took
place on July 8 in La Paz where teachers joined by
students and parents held a militant demonstration
to demand free education for all and to denounce
the de facto government's privatization
agenda in education and the deplorable state of
rural education in particular. Many expressed
anger at the Ministry of Education's plans to
continue delivering online classes only for some
time, even though in rural areas families often
lack access to the internet and the costly high
tech devices required for their children to be
able to participate in virtual classes, meaning
they will simply be left behind. The response of
the dictatorship was to fire teargas at the
demonstrators.
Then on July 14, thousands of unionized workers
and members of social movements marched together
to denounce the corruption and anti-social
wrecking of the coup government, the lack of
medicines for the people and to demand there be no
further postponement of the general election
scheduled at that time for September 6.
Postponed Elections and Lawfare
A general election originally set to take place
on May 3 was rescheduled for September 6 and has
been postponed again to October 18, the result of
a consensus reached by the country's political
factions, according to the Supreme Electoral
Tribunal. Hours before the latest postponement was
announced, Evo Morales declared from Argentina
where he has been living in exile that another
delay would be against the interests of the
people, prolonging ungovernability and the
economic crisis wracking the country as the
pandemic rages out of control. He said it would
serve only to give more time for the coup forces
to continue their persecution of social leaders
and MAS candidates right at a time when the
party's candidate for president, Luis Arce, leads
the polls.
The delay will also give the coup government more
time to coerce the Electoral Tribunal to go along
with another of its key demands: that the legal
status of MAS be removed, so its candidates are
unable to run in the election -- a way to preempt
a win by its presidential candidate, who is also
falsely accused of violating the electoral law. In
response, MAS-IPSP issued a communiqué on July 19
condemning "in the strongest possible terms the
attempts of some politicians who want to achieve,
through the banning of our political instrument,
what they cannot achieve at the ballot box." It
said that MAS had declared itself in a state of
emergency in the face of this new attempt to ban
the party and its candidates and would take legal
action in its own defence. "Together with the
Bolivian people, and with the truth up front, we
will defend democracy, peace and social justice,"
the communiqué concluded.
It is to be expected that Áñez and her gang will
continue scheming to avoid holding the election
indefinitely and to bar MAS from running if and
when it does take place in order to consolidate
their coup. They are engaging in the same dirty
legal manipulations, often referred to as lawfare,
against MAS officials, members and supporters as
have been used against former Presidents Lula da
Silva in Brazil and Rafael Correa and others in
Ecuador. All are subject to bogus criminal charges
and vicious character assassination, with some
already jailed with no evidence they have
committed any crimes. Seven former government
ministers and officials of MAS granted asylum
months ago by Mexico have been forced to spend the
last eight months inside the Mexican embassy in La
Paz as virtual prisoners. They are threatened with
arrest should they step outside -- a crude
violation of diplomatic norms as well as
international human rights conventions that
require safe passage for asylees to leave the
diplomatic mission of a country that has offered
them asylum so they are able to travel to that
country.
Future Prospects
La Paz, Bolivia, July 14,
2020.
All the evidence suggests that the U.S.
imperialists are unwilling to accept Bolivians
electing a president running on a program to
reverse the anti-national, anti-social direction
and state-organized racism they have so far
managed to impose in Bolivia through fraud and
force. If the people's forces and their candidates
once again win the election will they be able to
take office and govern based on that program? Is
the U.S. tiger likely to change its stripes? Or
the racist and violent Bolivian oligarchy? Or the
police and military commanded by unpatriotic
elements groomed and bribed by U.S. imperialism to
serve as an instrument of violent repression
against any and all who resisted last year's coup?
Everything taking place in Bolivia today confirms
that contempt for the rule of law, diplomatic
norms and the rights of sovereign nations and
peoples is the stock in trade of U.S. imperialism,
its accomplices and appeasers. Beyond just pinning
their hopes on winning a dubious election that may
never be allowed to proceed, the Bolivian people
are sure to draw on their experience and lessons
learned to organize themselves to face whatever
lies ahead in the fight for their democratic
rights and to defend the gains they have made over
the last 14 years. They have fighting traditions
and a rich heritage of anti-colonial,
anti-imperialist and revolutionary struggles going
back centuries to inspire them as they work out
how to organize themselves to fight for their
freedom, independence and rights in today's
conditions, keeping the initiative in their own
hands. In this they deserve the full support of
the Canadian and Quebec working class and people.
Workers of all industries and sectors continue
protests against Áñez and to protect social rights
created under Morales’s government.
Indigenous women have been at the forefront of
the fight to restore democracy in Bolivia.|
Luis Arce, MAS presidential candidate in the
upcoming election, and David Choquehuanca, running
for the vice-presidency. They lead all surveys so
far.
Important Anniversaries
- Fidel Castro -
The following article was provided by Fidel
Soldado
de las Ideas Editorial Team, published by
Cubadebate on July 20, 2020
Fidel Castro during the commemoration
of the 50th Anniversary of the Assault on
the Moncada Barracks held in Santiago de
Cuba, July 26, 2003.
|
In seven days, 67 years of the beginning of a
struggle will be commemorated. "It was not the
end, but the beginning," Fidel Castro once said. July
26 is and will remain one of the most important
pages in Cuban history. Under Fidel's
leadership, the assault on the Moncada and
Carlos Manuel de Céspedes barracks removed the
foundations of Batista's dictatorship.
That day, when everyone was ready, the Moncada
Manifesto, written by the young poet Raúl Gómez
García under the guidance of Fidel, was read out.
Gómez García read his poem "We Are Already in
Combat" and Fidel directed this brief appeal
to everyone:
"Comrades: In a few hours you will be victorious
or defeated, but regardless of the outcome --
listen well, comrades -- this movement will
triumph. If we win tomorrow, what Martí aspired to
will be fulfilled sooner. If the opposite happens,
our action will nevertheless set an example for
the Cuban people, to take up the banner and press
on."
Victory would come a few years later with the
Bearded Ones, when, led by Fidel, they descended
victoriously from the Sierra Maestra on January 1,
1959.
Cubadebate and
the website Fidel Soldado de las Ideas are
proposing that you walk the path of this
historical date today, through the speeches that
the Commander in Chief gave on several occasions
on July 26.
Fidel Castro, Santiago de Cuba, July 26, 2003.
Just when the Revolution triumphed, Fidel
expressed at a peasant gathering, on July 26,
1959:
"On seeing it today, on seeing how high we have
raised our flag, I felt so happy that I saw at
that moment all the sacrifices we have made, and
all the sacrifices we will have to make in the
future, rewarded."
A year later, remembering this same day,
in the Mercedes foothills of the Sierra Maestra,
he recalled:
"(...) July 26 and Sierra Maestra; they are two
names that must weigh very deeply in the hearts of
each of us."
"And so, that 26th of July was for us a moment
that when a struggle seemed to end, when an effort
to begin the battle for the liberation of our
people seemed to end, it was not the end,
but the beginning."
"But it was not always like that, and by
contrast, the memories of that first 26th came to
our minds, that afternoon when everything was
bitter and painful, when the pain of our comrades
who had died and the pain of the defeat that
forced the country to wait weighed on our spirits,
its limits impossible to imagine at that moment.
"And our people
is one of those peoples that has never trembled
in front of sacrifice, one of those
peoples that has never trembled at the price it
was forced to pay for its dignity and its freedom;
a people that has never trembled nor will it ever
tremble before the price it has to pay for its
happiness."
Fidel speaking to the people of Santiago, July 26,
1967.
On the 30th anniversary, in Santiago de Cuba,
on July 26, 1983, the Commander said:
"One thing remains the same as on July 26, 1953:
we have the same faith in the destiny of the
country, the same confidence in the virtues of our
people, the same certainty of victory, the same capacity to
dream of all that will be tomorrow’s reality,
on top of the already realized dreams of
yesterday.”
On July 26, 1987 he would also speak about the
new times, the revolution and the decision to
rectify:
"To rectify meant on July 26, 1953, to fight to
erase the old, to open a channel, to make a
revolution, to create a new life; It means that
today as well. Rectify
has
a really broad meaning, and I am actually
satisfied, stimulated by what I see, the
results that I see, even though we know that we
are still far from all our possibilities, that
there are many more possibilities ahead."
In more recent times, after several years of the
revolution being in power, in the central event
for the 45th anniversary of the assault on the
Moncada and Carlos Manuel de Céspedes barracks,
carried out in Santiago de Cuba, in 1998, he
acknowledged:
"We believe that we have fulfilled our duty, a
whole generation, having fought without pause nor
rest for 45 years since that July 26, 1953,
standing firm in our trenches, in our principles,
with the same ideas that inspired us that day."
"We support Fidel!" Havana, July 26, 1959.
On the significance of the date, in the
celebration of its 49th anniversary, in 2002, in
Ciego de Ávila, he recognized:
"(...) what are they this July 26th? An
indestructible path that unites the thought, the
heroism and the will to fight of the
inextinguishable bastion, whose independence Martí
wanted so as to prevent and that did prevent the
powerful and expansionist neighbour to the north
from expanding into the Antilles and falling with
that added strength on our lands in America."
Fidel in Pinar del Río, July 26, 1976.
He recalled on the 50th anniversary of the
assaults the validity of
revolutionary ideas and their effect
on the people:
"The Moncada Program was fulfilled and
overfulfilled. For a long time now we have been
pursuing much higher and more unimaginable dreams.
Today, great battles are being fought on the field
of ideas and we are facing problems associated
with the world situation, perhaps the most
critical that humanity has ever experienced."
"I wish to assure you of something similar to
what I said before the spurious court that judged
and condemned me for the struggle we began five
decades ago today, but this time I will not be the
one to say it; it is something affirmed and
foreseen by a people that carried out a profound,
transcendent and historic Revolution, and knew how
to defend it: Condemn me, it doesn't
matter! The peoples will have the last word!"
Speech in the Open Tribune in commemoration of the
47th anniversary of the assault on the Moncada
Barracks on July 26, 1953, in the Provisional
Square of the Revolution in
Pinar del Río, August 5, 2000.
On the 11th anniversary of the
assault on the Moncada and Carlos M. de Céspedes
barracks held in the city of Santiago de Cuba
where the people were responding to the anti-Cuba
manoeuvres adopted the day before by the
OAS.
(To access articles
individually click on the black headline.)
PDF
PREVIOUS ISSUES
| HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|