March 14, 2020 - No. 8
The COVID-19 Pandemic
Strict Comprehensive Measures
Urgently Recommended to Contain the Disease and
Protect the Population
• Oppose
Attempts
to Render the Population Passive
in the Face of Pandemic
• World
Health Organization Advice to Public
for COVID-19 Containment
• Symptoms
of Coronavirus Disease 2019
• Measures
in Canada
• One-Day
Snapshot of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Affirm Indigenous Rights -- Stand with
Wet'suwet'en
• Governments
Cannot
Hide from Their Responsibility to Abandon
Colonial Relations and Act With Respect for
Indigenous Rights
- Barbara Biley -
• Letter
Revealing
BC Solicitor General Authorization of
RCMP Deployment Released
- Joint Press Release -
75th Anniversary of Canada-Cuba Diplomatic
Relations
• First
Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Cuba
Addresses the Bilateral Relations
Latvian Exhibit in Ottawa
• Canadian
War Museum Should Be Condemned for
Falsifying What Canadians Stand For
Supplement
Important Anniversaries
• 137th
Anniversary of the Death of Karl Marx
• 149th Anniversary of
the Paris Commune
The COVID-19 Pandemic
The World Health Organization (WHO) has advised
strict comprehensive measures to contain the
coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) and to protect
the population, including quarantine, testing,
contact tracing, social distancing, and direct
population/community mobilization. On February 20,
the WHO published a report which noted:
"Much of the global community is not yet ready, in
mindset and materially, to implement the measures
that have been employed to contain COVID-19 in
China. These are the only measures that are
currently proven to interrupt or minimize
transmission chains in humans. Fundamental to
these measures is extremely proactive surveillance
to immediately detect cases, very rapid diagnosis
and immediate case isolation, rigorous tracking
and quarantine of close contacts, and an
exceptionally high degree of population
understanding and acceptance of these measures.
"COVID-19 is spreading with astonishing speed;
COVID-19 outbreaks in any setting have very
serious consequences; and there is now strong
evidence that non-pharmaceutical interventions can
reduce and even interrupt transmission.
Concerningly, global and national preparedness
planning is often ambivalent about such
interventions. However, to reduce COVID-19 illness
and death, near-term readiness planning must
embrace the large-scale implementation of
high-quality, non-pharmaceutical public health
measures. These measures must fully incorporate
immediate case detection and isolation, rigorous
close contact tracing and monitoring/quarantine,
and direct population/community engagement."[1]
In his opening remarks at the media
briefing on COVID-19 on March 13, the WHO
Director-General said: "Our message to countries
continues to be: you must take a comprehensive
approach. Not testing alone. Not contact tracing
alone. Not quarantine alone. Not social distancing
alone. Do it all.
"Any country that looks at the experience of other
countries with large epidemics and thinks 'that
won't happen to us' is making a deadly mistake. It
can happen to any country.
"The experience of China, the Republic of Korea,
Singapore and others clearly demonstrates that
aggressive testing and contact tracing, combined
with social distancing measures and community
mobilization, can prevent infections and save
lives."
The WHO report also pointed out that: "Achieving
China's exceptional coverage with and adherence to
these containment measures has only been possible
due to the deep commitment of the Chinese people
to collective action in the face of this common
threat. At a community level this is reflected in
the remarkable solidarity of provinces and cities
in support of the most vulnerable populations and
communities. Despite ongoing outbreaks in their
own areas, Governors and Mayors have continued to
send thousands of health care workers and tons of
vital [Personal Protective Equipment] supplies
into Hubei province and Wuhan city."
Another interesting piece of information in the
report says: "The implementation of these
containment measures has been supported and
enabled by the innovative and aggressive use of
cutting edge technologies, from shifting to online
medical platforms for routine care and schooling,
to the use of 5G platforms to support rural
response operations."
Based on the measures it has taken, China became
the first country to successfully contain
COVID-19, the WHO reports. On March 12 only 24 new
cases were reported, of which ten were travellers
returning to China, infected abroad. Elsewhere in
the region, reports indicate that currently
containment has also been successful in Singapore
and Hong Kong, which both applied strict
quarantine measures.
On March 11, the WHO assessed
that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic.
A pandemic is when a new disease for which people
do not have immunity spreads around the world
beyond expectations. One distinction is that the
spread of the disease in various regions is no
longer attributed to travellers only. It is the
first time that a pandemic is caused by a
coronavirus. The WHO also says that it is the
first pandemic "that can be controlled."
The WHO estimates the current mortality rate to
be about 3.4 per cent. In the U.S. it is estimated
to be about five per cent. Even if the mortality
rate were one per cent, it would still be ten
times higher than that of the normal seasonal
influenza.[2]
Reports also indicate a marked discrepancy between
officially diagnosed cases and actual cases. The
time it takes for patients to get tested and other
factors, including the extremely low rate of
testing in the U.S., result in a gap between the
reported number of cases and the real number. One
can expect 10 to 100 times the reported number.
This means there are already tens of thousands of
cases in North America, if not more.[3]
Strict, Socially Responsible Measures Needed
Reports indicate that several EU countries have
brought themselves to implement quarantine
measures, including Italy, Greece, Romania,
Austria, Denmark and just lately after initially
resisting, Germany, as well as at least 19 other
countries around the world, including Canada.[4] For
their part and to their shame, the U.S. and
Britain are among those countries which lag far
behind in following the WHO recommendations.[5]
Globalization, including just-in-time delivery of
goods, services and even human beings, has brought
the world together in an unprecedented socialized
way. Even though some countries have yet to see
any cases of the disease, we are all in this
together as one humanity with a common interest to
contain the coronavirus and protect the
population. The governments at every level must
take full responsibility for implementing the
WHO's recommendations responsibly. All those who
are working at home must continue to be paid in a
normal manner. All those laid off as a result of
the shutdown of workplaces must be compensated.
Governments have been encouraging privatization,
and contracting out and casualization of most
work, especially in the service sector, and now
they must guarantee that all contract workers and
the self-employed receive remuneration during this
special period. The workers who work in the
so-called gig economy, including where private
interests use software apps to favour their narrow
interests and workers are expected to be available
on demand to do one gig at a time, must also
receive compensation during this special period if
they too must stay in quarantine or be subjected
to more restrictive conditions of isolation.
The modern reality and condition of a socialized
economy and life demand that national governments
must fulfill their social responsibility to
contain this virus using the public health
measures recommended by the WHO, given the lack of
medical countermeasures at this time. They must
put the full weight of the economy and all public
and private institutions behind the successful
implementation and protection of the population,
making sure all those who need help receive it.
Where There Is a Will There's a Way!
The adage "Where there is a will there's a way"
applies under the circumstances. Despite the
decrepit state of many health care facilities and
dearth of beds and nursing and other personnel due
to the vicious anti-social offensive governments
have been imposing on our society to favour the
rich, as in any crisis, facilities can be
commandeered and equipped and qualified personnel
can be hired and trained to deal with the matter
at hand, taking every precaution required to
protect everyone involved. It can be done and must
be done!
Working
people must unite in action at every level and
determine how they can contribute to making
quarantine, isolation and the other strict
measures required effective and to asserting the
claims they are entitled to make on governments at
every level. Quarantining is a very important
first measure and people can inform themselves of
the guidelines they must follow. If they require
assistance, they must call the public health care
numbers they are provided with and describe their
symptoms and follow the instructions. Full testing
and treatment must be provided to everyone who
needs it. By closing everything down for the
two-week incubation period and then assessing
whether the virus has been contained on the basis
of verifiable results, and pursuing the
instructions of the WHO meticulously, Canada can
do its part to contain and mitigate this global
pandemic.
As for the working people, they can play their
role by speaking out to lay the claims on society
and the governments in charge that everyone is
entitled to make. This includes compensation for
the period they are off work because of closures
and measures to protect those public service
workers who do essential work in the health care
and education sectors and in all aspects of social
services, including home care, long-term care and
care for the youth, elderly and others in
distress. For those engaged in retail work related
to the sale of essential items such as food,
medicines and necessary hygiene products, in
transportation or any other essential service,
arrangements must be made to replace those workers
who must quarantine themselves for whatever
reason, undergo isolation at home or be
hospitalized, and to protect those still on the
job.
Nobody should be put in a situation of fending for
themselves to find a direction and the means to
cope as families and individuals during this
pandemic. All social organizations -- especially
unions, social clubs and associations of all kinds
-- should go into action to make sure their
members are informed and looked after.
The Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist)
has called on its organizations across the country
to inform themselves of the situation of their
members and supporters to make sure everyone is
taken care of and is informed, and to organize for
the implementation of prescribed protective
measures where needed not only in the homes and
neighbourhoods but also workplaces and educational
institutions.
All individuals and collectives are called upon to
unite in action to play their part and act
responsibly under all conditions and circumstances
to humanize the social and natural environment,
and to give meaning and substance to the necessity
of activating the human factor/social
consciousness and putting human beings in command
of their condition. By taking conscious measures
to make sure nobody is put in a situation of
having to fend for themselves, working Canadians
will proudly proclaim that this humanity is able
to bring the problems facing humankind under
control and that they have played their part.
All Out to Adopt the Measures
Necessary to Contain COVID-19
and Protect the Population!
Hold Governments at Every Level Responsible to
Implement the
Recommended Public Health Measures Fully and
Responsibly!
One Humanity, One Struggle!
All Out to Defend the Rights of All!
Notes
1. Report
of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19). 16-24 February 2020.
2. "COVID-19
Educational Disruption and Response," UNESCO,
March 11, 2020
3. "Coronavirus: Why You
Must Act Now," Tomas Pueyo, Medium, March 10,
2020.
4. "Die Entdeckung der
Langsamkeit," Heike Schmoll, Frankfurter
Allgemeine Zeitung, March 10, 2020.
5. According to the WHO
quarantine refers to "the restriction of
activities or separation of persons who are not
ill, but who may have been exposed to an
infectious agent or disease, with the objective of
monitoring symptoms and early detection of cases."
It can be voluntary, which some refer to as
self-quarantine, or mandatory, depending on the
circumstances. Quarantine is different from
isolation, which is "the separation of ill or
infected persons from others, so as to prevent the
spread of infection or contamination." Isolation
means staying indoors and completely avoiding
contact with other people to the greatest extent
possible for those who have tested positive for
COVID-19, are waiting to be tested or awaiting the
results of their test. It is sometimes referred to
as self-isolation when individuals act to
implement the necessary measures on their own in
their home or another place such as a hotel room
when traveling.
The National Health Authority of Canada indicates
that when quarantine and isolation/self-isolation
are undertaken at an individual level, they are
considered social distancing approaches, along
with such measures as avoiding crowding, school
and workplace measures and closures, public/mass
gathering cancellations, etc. For further details,
click
here.
For interim WHO guidelines for quarantining in the
context of the containment of coronavirus disease
(COVID-19), click
here.
A lot of media coverage and official statements
in the U.S., as well as from certain quarters in
Canada, are focused on bad-mouthing China as a
dictatorship which violates human rights. This is
intended to divert from the fundamental point that
China is defending every life -- the most
essential human right. The relentless campaign
against China in relation to the outbreak of the
virus goes so far as to say that 5G platforms and
cell phone systems are used "to spy" on people.
The U.S. magazine Science published a
series of articles to say that although the way in
which China handled the epidemic was laudable, "it
was done at the expense of human rights." The
article says, "How feasible these kinds of
stringent measures are in other countries is
debatable." It quotes Lawrence Gostin, a global
health law scholar at Georgetown University as
saying, "China is unique in that it has a
political system that can gain public compliance
with extreme measures. But its use of social
control and intrusive surveillance are not a good
model for other countries." In this way, the need
to protect the population is reduced to an
anti-communist rendering of what might constitute
social control. "The country also has an
extraordinary ability to do labour-intensive,
large-scale projects quickly," says Jeremy
Konyndyk, a senior policy fellow at the Center for
Global Development: "No one else in the world
really can do what China just did."
Nor should they, says lawyer Alexandra Phelan, a
China specialist at Georgetown's Center for Global
Health Science and Security. "Whether it works is
not the only measure of whether something is a
good public health control measure," Phelan says.
"There are plenty of things that would work to
stop an outbreak that we would consider abhorrent
in a just and free society."
All of it illustrates the mindset of opposing the
mobilization of the human factor. The aim is to
disinform the population at home so that nobody
develops their own reference points to decide what
their society needs to do to contain the
coronavirus.
A starting point is to demand the implementation
of the recommendations of the World Health
Organization that only all-out quarantine will
contain the virus and protect the population and
see how that can be applied in a living effective
way.
The World Health Organization has issued the
following advice to the general public on basic
protective measures against the new Coronavirus
COVID-19:
1) Wash your hands frequently
Regularly and thoroughly clean your hands with
an alcohol-based hand rub or wash them with soap
and water.
Why? Washing your hands with soap and water or
using alcohol-based hand rub kills viruses that
may be on your hands.
2) Maintain social distancing
Maintain at least 1 metre (3 feet) distance
between yourself and anyone who is coughing or
sneezing.
Why? When someone coughs or sneezes they spray
small liquid droplets from their nose or mouth
which may contain virus. If you are too close, you
can breathe in the droplets, including the
COVID-19 virus if the person coughing has the
disease.
3) Avoid touching eyes, nose and mouth
Why? Hands touch many surfaces and can pick up
viruses. Once contaminated, hands can transfer the
virus to your eyes, nose or mouth. From there, the
virus can enter your body and can make you sick.
4) Practice respiratory hygiene
Make sure you, and the people around you, follow
good respiratory hygiene. This means covering your
mouth and nose with your bent elbow or tissue when
you cough or sneeze. Then dispose of the used
tissue immediately.
Why? Droplets spread virus. By following good
respiratory hygiene you protect the people around
you from viruses such as cold, flu and COVID-19.
5) If you have fever, cough and difficulty
breathing, seek medical care early
Stay home if you feel unwell. If you have a
fever, cough and difficulty breathing, seek
medical attention and call in advance. Follow the
directions of your local health authority.
Why? National and local authorities will have the
most up-to-date information on the situation in
your area. Calling in advance will allow your
health care provider to quickly direct you to the
right health facility. This will also protect you
and help prevent spread of viruses and other
infections.
6) Stay informed and follow advice given by
your healthcare provider
Stay informed on the latest developments about
COVID-19. Follow advice given by your healthcare
provider, your national and local public health
authority or your employer on how to protect
yourself and others from COVID-19.
Why? National and local authorities will have the
most up to date information on whether COVID-19 is
spreading in your area. They are best placed to
advise on what people in your area should be doing
to protect themselves.
Protection measures for persons who are in or
have recently visited (past 14 days) areas where
COVID-19 is spreading
Follow the guidance outlined above.
Stay at home if you begin to feel unwell, even
with mild symptoms such as headache and slight
runny nose, until you recover.
Why? Avoiding contact with others and visits to
medical facilities will allow these facilities to
operate more effectively and help protect you and
others from possible COVID-19 and other viruses.
If you develop fever, cough and difficulty
breathing, seek medical advice promptly as this
may be due to a respiratory infection or other
serious condition. Call in advance and tell your
provider of any recent travel or contact with
travellers.
Why? Calling in advance will allow your health
care provider to quickly direct you to the right
health facility. This will also help to prevent
possible spread of COVID-19 and other viruses.
Drive-through COVID-19 test centre in Ottawa,
March 12, 2020. (G. Rose)
Federal Government
At this time, the Public Health Agency of Canada
has assessed the public health risk associated
with COVID-19 as low for the general population in
Canada but says this could change rapidly. There
is an increased risk of more severe outcomes for
Canadians:
- aged 65 and over
- with compromised immune systems
- with underlying medical conditions
Nationally, as of March 14, there were 252
confirmed cases and one presumptive case, with 11
of the confirmed cases reported as recovered.
Regarding border measures, the federal government
says: "Travellers arriving at all major Canadian
airports receive information and, if coming from
high-risk areas, are screened to determine steps
needed to protect their health and that of others.
Similar information is available at Canada's land
border crossings. All travellers are advised to
monitor themselves for symptoms and to contact the
local public health authority in their province or
territory if they feel sick."
Regarding preventative measures, the federal
government has advised avoiding all non-essential
travel outside of Canada and all cruise ship
travel. It calls on those who have "travelled to
Hubei province, China, Iran or Italy in the last
14 days" to "limit your contact with others for 14
days, starting the day you began your journey to
Canada. This means self-isolate and stay at home.
Contact the public health authority in your
province or territory within 24 hours of arriving
in Canada for advice." On March 13 the government
stepped up its advisory to say that everyone
arriving in Canada from another country should
self-isolate and monitor themselves for symptoms
for 14 days. In a March 15 interview with
CTV the Prime Minister said stricter border and
international travel measures were still being
considered.
For more information on the coronavirus and how
to limit its spread, the federal government has
created this website, canada.ca/coronavirus,
with resources that can be downloaded. It has also
set up an information line (1-833-784-4397), which
is available from 7:00 am to midnight (EDT) seven
days a week.
The Government of Canada says it has committed
$1.1 billion in public health measures in response
to the coronavirus outbreak. These measures
include:
- Repatriation of Canadians: $7 million,
- Initial support to the World Health
Organization: $2 million,
- Sustained communications and public education:
$50 million,
- Investing in research: $275 million,
- Support for provinces and territories: $500
million,
- Personal protective equipment: $50 million,
- International assistance: $50 million,
- Employment Insurance Sickness Benefits: $5
million,
- Work Sharing Program: $12 million, and
- Additional public health response, including
funding for Indigenous Services Canada: $100
million.
Measures to Combat COVID-19 in Education
One of the features of this novel coronavirus is
that it can spread undetected amongst young
people, meaning that young people can often be
carriers of the virus, whether they are infected
or not. Thus how to preventing the spread of
coronavirus in the education system is an
important matter.
Public Health Canada issued guidelines to schools
and daycare facilities for responding to COVID19.
Their guidelines for schools indicate:
"Public health measures implemented in schools and
daycare settings are intended to provide a safer
school environment by encouraging personal
protective measures, communication to teachers and
parents, and environmental cleaning. Public Health
Guidance for Schools (K-12) and Childcare Programs
(COVID-19) is available. Given the current
epidemiology of the virus, it is unknown what role
children play in community transmission of
COVID-19, therefore the impact of school
mitigation measures on community transmission of
COVID-19 is uncertain, though strategies such as
more frequent hand washing, respiratory etiquette
and separation of ill students from healthy
students is always prudent.
"School/daycare measures can vary in scope from
very simple measures (e.g. increasing distancing
between desks) through to more extensive measures,
such as closures. Widespread school closures as a
control measure have the potential of coming at a
high economic and social cost since school
closures would impact the many families that have
one or both parents working outside of the home.
School closures can reduce virus transmission, but
the timing and duration of the closure is critical
(before the peak of the epidemic), and later
closures could be ineffective and be socially
disruptive. Consideration also needs to be given
to the likeliness that students will congregate
elsewhere in less controlled environments, thus
reducing the intended benefits of school closures
and potentially shifting the transmission of the
virus to other community settings."
Another aspect raised by Health Canada is the
importance of the role of public schools as places
to disseminate information to the youth and their
families quickly and as a source of food for
students such as breakfast or lunch programs,
which they may otherwise not get at home, and the
need to maintain these supports in any event.
They define a number of types of measures to
prevent the spread of the virus, which include:
Term
|
Definition
|
School
mitigation measures
|
School
remains open and alternative measures
are implemented to promote social
distancing and decrease density among
students and staff.
|
Class
dismissal
|
School
remains open with core staff, but most
children stay home (similar to a "snow
day").
|
School
closure
|
School
is closed to all children and staff.
|
Reactive
closure or dismissal
|
School
is closed after a substantial incidence
of illness is reported among children or
staff (or both) in that school.
|
Proactive
closure or dismissal
|
School
is closed before a substantial
transmission among children and staff.
Is only helpful before the peak of an
outbreak in the community.
|
They provide specific details when considering
these measures.[1]
Of note is that school mitigation emphasizes
social distancing which in this case means finding
ways to reduce the proximity of students to one
another. This means changing school schedules to
mitigate proximity in public transit getting to
school such as staggering school starts,
increasing desk distances between students and
dividing classes into smaller groups. Thus it
requires reduction of class sizes in most cases
and keeping students from congregating. It is
important to note in this respect that smaller
class sizes are in fact related to preventing the
spread of infectuous diseases in schools and
should also be considered a general preventive
measure at all times.
Another important matter is the recommendation
that school closures must be considered against
the general disruption on the lives of families
who may then be adversely affected in being unable
to work and also that while home students may also
then congregate in other areas defeating the
purpose of the closure. In terms of interrupting
transmission of the virus proactive closures
should be more than 2 weeks and should be carried
out before a peak in the epidemic.
Post-Secondary
Across Canada, universities and colleges are
moving towards online delivery of classes which
were previously live, especially in the case where
classes are more than 250 students to avoid
spreading the virus. A number of institutions are
taking a period of days to transition courses
online and will re-start following this.
K-12 Education
British Columbia
On March 12, the BC government announced that
anyone who chooses to travel outside of Canada
will be asked to voluntarily stay away from work
or school for 14 days upon their return. They
announced that over spring break (March 16-27) the
BC government will also work with school districts
to develop procedures to be implemented with
students and staff when classes resume. They
indicate that some post-secondary institutions
have classes with more than 250 students, and they
are working with them to take measures to address
this situation.
BC Teachers' Federation (BCTF) President Teri
Mooring issued a statement on March 14 which
stated: "This is a particularly scary time for
those who are health compromised or have loved
ones who are. This is a time to show we care. We
can find safe ways to do just that. Especially
understanding that everyone reacts to stress and
anxiety differently.
"Upon returning from Spring Break we will need to
be prepared to face some challenges. It's
difficult to precisely define them all at this
point, due to fast moving events.
"Please know a lot of planning and work is
happening now. The BCTF is working with government
to ensure the return from the break is as smooth
and safe as possible. We will continue to provide
information and updates during the next couple of
weeks."
Alberta
On March 13, the Alberta government recommended
that schools remain open at this time. However it
recommended that schools eliminate large
gatherings of students such as assemblies and
consider cancelling extracurricular activities
that involve physical contact. The government of
Alberta has also stated "effective March 12, all
travellers returning from outside Canada must
self-isolate for 14 days and monitor for
symptoms." Spring break in Alberta is from March
20 to March 27.
On March 14, Alberta Teachers' Association
President Jason Schilling issued a statement that
approves of the decision to keep schools open, but
raising concerns about the lack of funding for
cleaning staff, who are necessary now more than
ever.
"If schools are going to remain open, then they
must be safe and healthy places for everyone in or
in transit to them -- I am very concerned that
very many schools do not have sufficient funding
to hire light-duty custodians to undertake the
ongoing daytime cleaning needed to meet the
standards that must be in place to protect the
health of students, staff, teachers and visitors
in our schools," said Schilling. "The government
may need to assist school boards to ensure they
can hire staff and provide them with the cleaning
supplies they need to meet the standards for
sanitation set out by the Chief Medical Officer of
Health."
The Alberta government announced it will be making
changes to the Employment Standards Code to "allow
employees who are required to self-isolate or are
caring for a loved one with COVID-19 to take 14
days of paid job-protected leave to cover the
self-isolation period being recommended by
Alberta's chief medical officer of health."
"There will be no requirement to have a medical
note for such leave or to have worked for an
employer for 90 days to qualify for such leave."
In addition to the measures requested by Alberta
Health, different school boards are taking various
other measures. In Calgary public schools,
parent-teacher interviews were cancelled along
with other events open to parents and community
members. Public rentals of facilities, such as
gyms, have been cancelled, as well as events where
student populations from different schools have
contact with each other.
Saskatchewan
According to the CBC, "The Saskatoon Public School
Division, the province's largest, has taken steps
including cancelling all large gatherings, field
trips, guest speakers, external presentations and
tours."
The division has also cancelled all professional
development, large gatherings, meetings for staff
and upcoming open houses for unique programs. All
cultural activities and events, like pipe
ceremonies, feasts and round dances, have also
been cancelled. Saskatchewan's spring break is
April 10-17.
Manitoba
A letter to school board superintendents from the
Minister of Education encouraged schools to
"continue to take measures to help prevent the
spread of viruses. Best practices for the
prevention of viral illness include regular and
thorough handwashing with warm water and soap,
coughing and sneezing into an arm or tissue,
encouraging people to stay home from school or
work when they are sick, and ensuring that
surfaces and objects are wiped with disinfectant
regularly." Manitoba's spring break is March 30 to
April 3.
Ontario
On March 12, the Ontario government issued a
Ministerial Order to close all publicly funded
K-12 schools for two weeks after the spring break
which began on March 14. The closure also affects
school-based child care programs housed in
publicly funded schools, which will also close if
the school board so decides. The government cited
a recommendation from Ontario's Chief Medical
Officer of Health in making the decision. In an
earlier press conference Dr. David Williams, the
Chief Medical Officer of Health had recommended
that parents travelling with children during
spring break should stay away from school upon
return. Schools are scheduled to re-open April 5.
It is of note that neither school boards nor
education unions were part of the decision-making
process to close the schools and were thrown into
chaos on the Friday before the March break to deal
with the many questions and concerns of teachers
and support staff as to whether they would be on
forced layoff and receive pay. The Minister
indicated that this would be left up to school
boards to decide and implement.
The closure of schools comes right in the midst of
negotiations between the Ontario government and
teachers' and education workers' unions. On March
12 prior to the government's announcement, in
response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Elementary
Teachers' Federation of Ontario suspended rotating
strike action that was scheduled to begin on March
23. Both the Ontario Secondary School Teachers'
Federation (OSSTF) and the Ontario English
Catholic Teachers' Association (OECTA) announced
that they would be postponing their annual
meetings in response to the pandemic. OSSTF
President Harvey Bischof issued a statement
indicating "OSSTF will welcome any opportunity to
work with the Ministry of Education and Ontario's
school boards to ensure that our schools are safe
places for our students, and for the educators who
work with them.
"To that end, we are writing to the Minister of
Education, the Ontario Public School Boards'
Association, and the Council of Trustees'
Associations to offer our cooperation and support
in any efforts that will help to combat the spread
of the COVID-19 virus."
At the same time that the government announced the
closure of schools, it also announced that it had
a tentative agreement with OECTA.
Quebec
On March 13 the government of Quebec announced
that all daycares, schools, CEGEPS and
universities in the province will be closed for at
least two weeks starting March 14. Premier Legault
said special daycares will be set up for parents
of health professionals and other essential
service workers to allow them to continue to offer
those services. Spring break in Quebec was March
2-9.
New Brunswick
The government of New Brunswick has announced that
all public schools will be closed in New Brunswick
for two weeks. The closure will not affect
daycares, since they are considered an essential
service. The decision was made by a committee of
the parties in the legislature, made up of cabinet
ministers and the four party leaders.
Nova Scotia
In an interview with the Chronicle Herald
the president of the Nova Scotia Teachers' Union
Paul Wozney said all provincial public schools
should remain closed after the March break.
"I think it's imperative at this point," Paul
Wozney said of extended school closures to help
mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 virus. It's
not a matter of if COVID-19 lands here, it's a
matter of when. "We know that limiting social
contact is a key factor in mitigating the spread,"
Wozney said. "We know that schools are a major
transmission hub for traditional flu. We have
schools in Nova Scotia today that barely have 50
per cent attendance for either staff or students.
There is no question that schools are a hot spot
for the transmission of communicable disease."
"Because we have the highest population of seniors
in the country, we cannot afford not to be a
leader on COVID-19 prevention," Wozney said.
"That's the population that stands to be most
dramatically impacted by COVID-19. We also have
one of the weakest and least healthy emergency
medical systems in the country. Especially in
rural Nova Scotia, we have emergency room closures
in record numbers.
"This is not about students, it's not about
learning, it's about public health," Wozney said.
"It's about the safety of the entire province and
it's a chance to mitigate or head off a potential
disaster. I've already conveyed to Minister [Zach]
Churchill that closing schools for any period,
that the teachers of Nova Scotia would be partners
when the schools reopened to address concerns
around learning. Those are fixable things, those
are not impossible problems to resolve. It's more
possible to fix catching up on learning than it is
to fix a death toll that could have been
prevented."
Newfoundland and Labrador
Newfoundland students returned from spring break
on March 9. Dr. Robert Strang, the province's
Chief Medical Officer of Health, said anyone
travelling outside of Canada may have come in
contact with COVID-19 and should monitor their
health and minimize contact with others for 14
days after returning. The province had cancelled
all school-organized trips to international
destinations scheduled for March break. The
Newfoundland and Labrador English School District
and Conseil scolaire francophone have suspended
all extracurricular activities involving
interaction between different school populations
until further notice. This includes regional and
provincial sports tournaments, heritage fairs,
science fairs, drama festivals, or any activity
that sees multiple school populations gathered for
showcase events or competition.
Nunavut
In Nunavut, schools have been directed on enhanced
cleaning protocols, hygiene and disinfecting
measures and implementing non-sharing protocols.
Northwest Territories
The government of the Northwest Territories states
that the Department of Education, Culture and
Employment has met with education bodies who are
prepared to put their contingency plans in place
for school closures should the Chief Public Health
Officer direct this action. Northwest Territories
spring break is from March 15-28, two full weeks.
Yukon
The Yukon spring break is from March 15-28. The
Chief Medical Officer of the Yukon, in responding
to concerns from many Yukoners who may have
attended the Prospectors and Developers
Association of Canada conference in Toronto, where
a confirmed case of COVID-19 was established,
stated, "Yukoners who attended the conference may
have been exposed to COVID-19. Symptoms of
COVID-19 include a cough, fever or shortness of
breath. If you don't have these symptoms, then you
can go about your regular day-to-day activities.
This includes attending work, classes, events and
other activities. However, if you develop any of
the symptoms listed above, then please stay home
and contact Yukon Communicable Disease Control at
1-867-667-8323 to arrange for testing." The
government of the Yukon has also taken the
decision to cancel the Arctic Winter Games which
were to take place in Whitehorse from March 15-21.
Note
1. Measures for Educational Facilities
School mitigation measures are implemented to
reduce the unintended consequences of school
closures or dismissal. The following strategies
can be considered:
- Strict exclusion policies for students
exhibiting symptoms of COVID-19,
- Increasing desk distance between students,
- Cancelling or postponing after-school events,
- Restricting access to common areas,
- Staggering the school schedule to limit the
numbers of students/children in attendance at one
time (e.g. staggered lunch breaks, recesses),
- Reducing mixing students during transport to and
from school (separation of children on school
buses by 2 metres where possible),
- dividing classes into smaller groups, and
- cancelling classes that bring students together
from multiple classrooms.
These measures are intended to serve the purpose
of mitigating some of the unintended consequences
of school closures (e.g. parents/caregivers who
miss work to take care of children can have
negative financial implications and
students/children who access free school meals
could be negatively impacted if those meals are
not otherwise available.) Additionally, keeping
facilities open will allow teachers to consider
delivering lessons and material remotely,
maintaining continuity with teaching and learning.
School closure decisions should be made in
consultation with local public health authorities
and based on a risk assessment. Closure
considerations should include:
- The priority goal of minimizing social
disruption and child safety
- Epidemiology and transmissibility of the disease
- Contact patterns in the school/childcare program
- Amount of contact between individuals within the
environment
- Size of classrooms
- Interaction of students between classes
- The impact of certain programs (e.g., school
meal programs) on families who access them.
- Innate protective factors built into schools and
childcare settings including:
- A forum to educate,
inform and communicate with students/ children and
their families in an efficient and timely manner.
- A defined structure to
support the economic and social elements of the
community by allowing parents to continue to work
and volunteer.
Reactive school closures are in response to virus
activity (i.e. a consequence of disease activity)
impacting the safe functioning of the school due
to increased staff absenteeism and co-infection
potential among students. Considerations should
include:
- The number of ill students/children and staff.
- The impact of school absenteeism and/or staff
shortages on schools/childcare operations.
Proactive school closures may be considered to
interrupt the transmission amongst children and
indirectly protect other age groups who may be
vulnerable to COVID-19. The decision about the
school closure at local/regional/national level
will largely depend on the timing and
epidemiological situation. Considerations should
include:
- The timing of school/daycare closures in
relation to the epidemic peak is an important
consideration.
- School closures of less than 2 weeks have been
shown to have minimal impact on disruption of
virus transmission in communities.
- Holiday schedules should also be considered as
opportunistic (i.e. early closures).
Source: Health
Canada
Click to enlarge
On Friday, March 13 World Health Organization
Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
said Europe had become the epicentre of the
COVID-19 pandemic "with more reported cases and
deaths than the rest of the world combined, apart
from China." He added that more cases are now
being reported every day than were reported in
China at the height of its epidemic. He also
emphasized that all countries with active cases
have unaffected areas, meaning that robust
surveillance is needed to find, isolate, test and
treat every case, to break the chains of
transmission. Even if transmission cannot be
stopped, he said, it can be slowed down, and you
can protect health facilities, old age homes and
other vital areas -- but only if you test all
suspected cases.
Snapshot of the Situation on March 13
Italy has the highest number of reported active
cases anywhere at the present time. On Friday,
March 13 it registered by far the most new cases
(2,547) and new deaths (250) anywhere. That day,
exactly three weeks after Italy identified its
first coronavirus cluster in its northern Lombardy
region, saw the biggest single day increase in
deaths due to the virus. Spain followed Italy with
2,086 new cases, while Germany and France also
registered several hundred new cases.
The continuously updating website Worldometers
indicates:
"There have so far been 145,634 COVID-19 cases
reported worldwide in 138 countries. The report
for March 13 includes the 696 affected passengers
aboard the Diamond Princess Liner cruise ship
harboured in Yokohama, Japan, of whom 364 are
active cases, 7 have died and 32 remain in serious
or critical condition."
Some other totals reported on March 13 included:
Deaths: 5,436
Recovered: 70,931
Active cases: 67,669 with 6,082 (9 per cent) of
these in serious or critical condition
Closed cases: 77,965 (93 percent recovered; 7 per
cent have died)
New cases: 11,058 (over the previous day)
The number of people affected to date per one
million population in countries with the highest
number of reported cases:
China: (80,815 cases): 56.1 infected per
one million
Italy: (17,660 cases): 292.1 infected per
one million
Iran: (11,364 cases): 135.3 infected per
one million
South Korea: (7,979 cases): 157.7 infected
per one million
Numbers for Selected Countries in Different
Parts of the World
Figures from Europe as of March 13:
Italy: (17,660 cases, 14,955 active;
1,266 deaths) with 2,547 new cases, 250 new deaths
Spain: (5,232 cases, 4,906 active; 133
deaths) with 2,086 new cases and 47 new deaths.
Germany: (3,675 cases, 3,621 active; 8
deaths) with 930 new cases, 2 new deaths
France: (3,661 cases, 3,570 active; 79
deaths) with 785 new cases, 18 new deaths
Britain: (798 cases, 769 active; 11 deaths)
with 208 new cases, 1 new death
By comparison, China reported just 11 new cases on
March 13, all but four of them travellers who
arrived in China from other countries.
In Eurasia:
Russia: (45 cases, 37 active; no deaths)
with 11 new cases
In West Asia:
Iran: (11,364 cases, 7,331 active; 514
deaths) with 1,289 new cases and 85 new deaths
Qatar: (350 cases, all active; no deaths)
with 58 new cases
Bahrain: (201 cases, 166 active; no deaths)
with 13 new cases
Israel: (126 cases, 122 active; no deaths)
with 17 new cases
Iraq: (101 cases, 68 active, 9 deaths) with
18 new cases
Palestine: (35 cases, all active; no
deaths) with 4 new cases
Jordan: (1 case, none active; no deaths)
In Southeast and South Asia:
South Korea: (7,979 cases, 7,398 active; 71
deaths) with 110 new cases, 5 new deaths
Vietnam: (44 cases, 28 active; no deaths)
with no new cases
Indonesia: (69 cases, 60 active; 4 deaths)
with 35 new cases, 3 new deaths
India: (82 cases, 70 active; 2 deaths)
with 8 new cases, 1 new death
Pakistan: (28 cases, 26 active; no deaths)
with 7 new cases
In North America:
USA: (2,291 cases, 2,200 active; 50 deaths)
with 594 new cases, 9 new deaths
Canada: (198 total cases, 186 active; 1
death) with 56 new cases
Mexico: (12 cases, 8 active; no deaths)
with no new cases
In Central America and the Caribbean:
Panama: (27 cases, all active; 1 death)
with 13 new cases
Costa Rica: (23 cases, all active; no
deaths) with no new cases
Jamaica: (8 cases, all active; no deaths)
with 6 new cases
Dominican Republic: (5 cases, all active,
no deaths) with no new cases
Cuba: (4 cases, all active; no deaths) with
1 new case
There are a very small number of cases in other
Caribbean islands, most reporting one confirmed
case only.
In South America:
Brazil: (151 cases, all active; no deaths )
with 74 new cases
Chile: (43 cases, all active; no deaths)
with 10 new cases
Argentina: (31 cases, 29 active; 2 deaths)
with no new cases, 1 new death
Peru: (29 cases, all active; no deaths)
with 6 new cases
Venezuela: (2 cases, both new and active;
no deaths)
In Africa:
Egypt: (80 cases, 51 active; 2 deaths) with
no new cases
South Africa: (24 cases, all active; no
deaths) with 8 new cases
Oceania:
Australia: (199 cases, 179 active; 3
deaths) with 43 new cases
New Zealand: (5 cases, all active; no
deaths) with no new cases
Control and Mitigation of COVID-19
Various measures to contain or mitigate the
spread of COVID-19 have been adopted or advised by
different countries as well as by different
jurisdictions within countries.
Some of the measures adopted include travel bans
from certain countries and areas, social
distancing, cancelling, banning or encouraging the
cancellation of large events and gatherings,
closure of schools, childcare centres and other
facilities and businesses, having people work from
home, implementation of special controls and
testing at border crossings and airports, closing
of borders (with the number of countries doing
this expanding daily), requests or orders for
people to go into quarantine or self-isolate for
14 days upon arriving from other countries.
Measures Taken and Recommended by Canada
On March 13, Prime Minister Trudeau announced
that Parliament would shut down for five weeks
until April 20, two more weeks than MPs had been
scheduled not to sit during that period. People
have been advised to refrain from all
international travel and to voluntarily
self-isolate for 14 days upon returning to Canada
from outside the country. Flights returning to
Canada will be restricted to a small number of
airports. Cruise ships with more than 500 people
will not be able to dock in Canada until July 1.
Cancellation of all large events has been advised,
and is occurring. A number of provinces have
announced school closings after the March break
week. The one-week waiting period to claim
Employment Insurance sickness benefits is being
waived for those who go into quarantine and are
eligible to collect benefits. The government is
reportedly "exploring additional measures" to
provide some kind of income support for Canadians
not eligible for EI sickness benefits.
Measures Taken by United States
U.S. President Donald Trump announced on March 13
that he was declaring the COVID-19 pandemic a
national emergency, saying that would "open up"
$50 billion for state and local governments to
respond to the outbreak. He further announced
March 14 that travel from Europe was being
suspended for 30 days, first excluding the UK and
Ireland, but later including them. In Texas, the
governor has declared a state of disaster, which
makes him commander-in-chief with broad powers to
rule by decree. Governors of several other states
have called in the National Guard. Washington
State is reported to be where the virus is
spreading the fastest.
Countries Subject to U.S. Blockade
In Iran, where as of March 13 there were more
than 11,000 cases and over 500 deaths, Foreign
Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif denounced the U.S.
"economic terrorism" against his country in a
letter to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres
regarding the U.S. unilateral sanctions which are
seriously obstructing Iran's access to essential
medical equipment, such as masks, respirators,
viral testing kits and protective gear for health
care workers. The illegal U.S. sanctions against
Iran, which have caused financial institutions
around the world to be reluctant to have any
dealings with Iran or Iranian entities for fear of
being penalized by the U.S., are serving their
intended criminal purpose of making the Iranian
people suffer. Zarif wrote that "it is imperative
that the United Nations and its member states join
the Iranian people in demanding that the
government of the United States abandon its malign
and fruitless approach against Iran."[1]
China has stepped in, providing assistance by
sending teams of experts, test kits and medical
equipment to the government of Iran. France,
Germany, and Britain have reportedly offered a few
million dollars in aid as well.
Meanwhile, the U.S. has been stepping up its
economic warfare, threatening anyone that stores
Iranian oil or petrochemicals, no matter who or
where they are, with retaliatory action, and
allegedly paying those who will provide it with
photographs of ship-to-ship transfers in
international waters by countries acting to get
around its unilateral coercive measures against
Iran.
Measures in Cuba include epidemiological
surveillance organized with active monitoring of
travellers and patients with respiratory symptoms.
It has 1,322 beds available in 11 hospitals and
824 in 10 quarantine centers. Treatment protocols
have been established, including the use of 22
medications manufactured in Cuba that will be used
to treat patients, following guidelines
established based on China's experience with the
virus. The four active cases Cuba currently has
all recently arrived from Italy.
Venezuela, which on March 13 reported its first
two cases of COVID-19 in people who returned from
travels in the U.S. and Europe, has also called
for an immediate end to the U.S. economic,
commercial and financial blockade against it. In a
press conference on March 12, President Nicolás
Maduro described a type of naval blockade the U.S.
has now mounted, sending ships to follow and
threaten commercial vessels leaving Venezuela in
an all-out effort to impede its ability to export
its oil. He also said U.S. sanctions obstructed
Venezuela's ability to obtain kits for testing for
the coronavirus and forced it to pay three times
the cost of medications it had to import. Because
of this situation, he said Venezuela had been
provided with test kits by the WHO and had ten
thousand treatments of the Cuban-manufactured drug
Interferon Alpha 2b at the ready. The drug is not
a cure but boosts the body's immune system
response so it is better able to fight the
disease. China has also provided thousands of test
kits and other equipment and has been asked to
send a team of experts to assist Venezuela in
dealing with a possible outbreak in the country.
At the press conference, President Maduro also
announced measures are being put in place to
protect the health of the population, emphasizing
that, with a spirit of solidarity and cooperation,
the crisis would be resolved. "We don't complain,
we work to solve problems." he said, pointing out
that Venezuela is used to dealing with the brutal
effects of the U.S. blockade. Teams will be put
into action, he said, to ensure the people get
their deliveries of food staples, and workers will
not be abandoned to fend for themselves if they
are forced to be off the job. He announced that
flights from Europe and Colombia are being
suspended, big gatherings will not be allowed and
that public places like the national museum will
be closed temporarily.
Note
1. For the full text of the letter, click
here.
Affirm Indigenous Rights -- Stand
with Wet'suwet'en
- Barbara Biley -
Since the talks between the Wet'suwet'en
hereditary chiefs and others with Federal and
Provincial Ministers concluded on March 1,
discussions have been taking place within the
Wet'suwet'en nation on the tentative agreement.
The agreement does not address the presence of
Coastal GasLink on the traditional territory,
which does not have the consent of the hereditary
chiefs, nor the continued presence and unlawful
actions of the RCMP. The RCMP has repeatedly
threatened, harassed and intimidated Wet'suwet'en
land defenders, legal observers, press and
supporters of the land defenders, with two major
assaults, in January 2019 and February 6-10, when
at least 20 people were arrested.
BC Premier Horgan
and other BC government spokespersons have
repeatedly disclaimed any responsibility for the
actions of the RCMP, implying that since the RCMP
is the provincial police force, their presence and
activities on Wet'suwet'en territory are somehow
"routine" and "normal," have nothing to do with
the political stand of the Horgan government that
"that pipeline is being built," and that no
direction was given to the police by the
government.
This claim that there was no political direction
to the RCMP was exposed as a blatant lie on March
6 when the Wet'suwet'en hereditary chiefs, the BC
Civil Liberties Association and the Union of BC
Indian Chiefs made public a letter sent on January
27 from BC Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor
General Mike Farnworth to RCMP Deputy Commissioner
Jennifer Strachan. In their press release the
three organizations state "In the letter,
Farnworth declared a "provincial emergency" under
the Provincial Police Service Agreement and
explicitly authorized the "internal redeployment
of resources within the Provincial Police
Service." Article 9 of the Provincial Police
Service Agreement stipulates that, if in the
opinion of the Provincial Minister an Emergency in
an area of provincial responsibility exists, then
the Provincial Police Service will be redeployed
at the written request of the Provincial Minister
and the Province will pay the costs of the
redeployment."
The hypocrisy of the governments of Canada and
British Columbia seems to be boundless. There was
much talk of 'respect' during the talks held
between February 27 and March 1 that gave rise to
the tentative agreement, but actions speak louder
than words. What is going on over the period of
time during which discussions are taking place
within the Wet'suwet'en nation shows the character
of the respect shown by representatives of Canada
and British Columbia towards the Wet'suwet'en and
the talks. Efforts are continuing to discredit the
hereditary leaders and to present the issue as one
of an internal dispute. Much media coverage has
been given to Wet'suwet'en supporters of the
Coastal GasLink Pipeline, particularly Teresa
Tait-Day who speaks on behalf of the Wet'suwet'en
Matrilineal Coalition (WMC). On March 10, at the
invitation of one of the parties which presented
her as an "Indigenous expert," Tait-Day addressed
the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern
Affairs in Ottawa where she said that "As female
Wet'suwet'en members and community leaders, we
want to be heard." Tait-Day said, "Many of the
male hereditary chiefs are acting out of
internalized historical oppression. We face
patriarchal domination."
On March 11, the Martlet, the student newspaper
at the University of Victoria, published an
article entitled "Wet'suwet'en Matriarchal
Coalition funded by B.C., Coastal GasLink to
'divide and conquer'." The Martlet
reports "The WMC is not, and was not ever, an
independent Indigenous body or governance
structure but rather a group founded with the BC
government and CGL to sway Wet'suwet'en public
opinion in favour of the pipeline, according to
documents obtained in a 2017 Freedom of
Information request.
In 2015, the WMC was incorporated as a
corporation, without consultation with the
Wet'suwet'en hereditary chiefs. Documents obtained
from the BC government show the WMC was a joint
project between CGL, the Ministry of
Indigenous Affairs and Reconciliation, and the
three founding members -- Gloria George, Darlene
Glaim, and Tait-Day.
In a resignation letter from Glaim, she says the
group was "formed with the intent to negotiate a
benefit agreement for Clan/House members with
[CGL]," and that in 2017 the hereditary chiefs
explicitly called the WMC a strategy used by the
government and CGL to disunite their people.
The article further reveals that the
BC government and Coastal GasLink each donated
$60,000 to WMC to carry out workshops to present
the economic benefits of LNG, and that besides
promoting the pipeline there is "an agreement
between the government and WMC, stating their goal
to bring Wet'suwet'en people together to 'discuss
decision-making processes for economic development
opportunities, specifically natural gas
development as that was identified as a gap in the
decision-making process.'" In other words, to
undermine the authority of the hereditary chiefs
which has been an obstacle to the smooth progress
of the CGL pipeline.
The more the treachery of those in power is
revealed the more it is clear that the problem is
not one of supporting or opposing this or that
project, or confusion over who has authority over
what, but a matter of bringing into being new
arrangements in which Indigenous hereditary rights
are enshrined in a modern Constitution, a matter
of concern to all Canadians.
- Joint Press Release -
RCMP vehicle photographed on Wet'suwet'en lands on
February 27, 2020, in contravention of agreement
that they would halt patrols during government
negotiations with Hereditary chiefs.
Wet'suwet'en Hereditary Chiefs, the BC Civil
Liberties Association and the Union of BC Indian
Chiefs are releasing a letter dated January 27,
2020 from BC Minister of Public Safety and
Solicitor General Mike Farnworth to RCMP Deputy
Commissioner Jennifer Strachan.
In the letter, Farnworth declared a "provincial
emergency" under the Provincial Police Service
Agreement and explicitly authorized the "internal
redeployment of resources within the Provincial
Police Service." Article 9 of the Provincial
Police Service Agreement stipulates that, if in
the opinion of the Provincial Minister an
Emergency in an area of provincial responsibility
exists, then the Provincial Police Service will be
redeployed at the written request of the
Provincial Minister and the province will pay the
costs of the redeployment.
This explosive revelation of the BC
Solicitor General authorizing additional RCMP
resources and redeployment comes on the heels of
repeated statements by the provincial government
that they lacked jurisdiction or authority over
RCMP actions in Wet'suwet'en territories. On
January 20, Premier John Horgan was reported as
saying "Our government has no authority to vary
that injunction, nor to direct the RCMP in the
fulfillment of its responsibilities." On February
10, Horgan again stated, "Governments do not
direct the courts, nor do we direct the RCMP."
According to Wet'suwet'en Hereditary Chief
Na'Moks, "The province bears responsibility for
the heavy RCMP deployment and for the policing of
our people on our own territories. In many of our
discussions, the province was passing the buck for
RCMP operations but this letter spells it out in
black and white. The provincial government can no
longer deny responsibility for the Indigenous
rights and human rights violations happening on
our territories. We have come to the table with
respect and truth but the province is not
demonstrating respectful or truthful conduct. We
have always asserted our laws and presence
peacefully, yet the province authorized the extra
deployment of RCMP against us. Canada and BC must
answer to this mistruth and absolutely must change
its ways."
"It is incredibly troubling and shocking that the
provincial government would declare the peaceful
assertion of Wet'suwet'en law and jurisdiction as
a provincial policing emergency. The Wet'suwet'en
people and the people of British Columbia have a
right to know on what basis this unprecedented
authorization was made. It is inconsistent for the
provincial government to, on the one hand,
legislate the UN Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples as well as state
non-interference in policing operations and, on
the other hand, authorize a RCMP deployment aimed
at over-policing and criminalizing Indigenous
peoples on their own territories," says Harsha
Walia, Executive Director of the BC Civil
Liberties Association.
Grand Chief Stewart Phillip of the
Union of BC Indian Chiefs stated, "This letter by
Mike Farnworth reveals the blatant hypocrisy and
lies of the provincial NDP government on the
Wet'suwet'en crisis. Farnworth sat silently while
Premier Horgan unabashedly lied that the Province
did not direct RCMP actions. This is an act of
government deceit not only against the
Wet'suwet'en but of the public at-large. The
province's rhetoric about reconciliation rings
even hollower. We call for the immediate
resignation of Mike Farnworth for dishonourable
conduct and for declaring the Wet'suwet'en people
a policing emergency and a threat on their own
territories."
75th Anniversary of Canada-Cuba
Diplomatic Relations
First Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs
of Cuba, Marcelino Medina González
addresses reception at Cuban Embassy,
March 4, 2020.
|
More than 200 guests from the diplomatic corps in
Ottawa, government officials and representatives
of several Canadian companies, Cubans resident in
Canada and friendship and solidarity organizations
from Ottawa and Montreal attended a reception on
March 4 at the Cuban Embassy to welcome the First
Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Cuba,
Marcelino Medina González on his visit to Canada.
Also in attendance was David Morrison, Foreign and
Defence Policy Advisor to the Prime Minister of
Canada, who spoke fondly about the good bilateral
relations, the rich historical exchanges and the
common interests between Cuba and Canada that bode
well for the future of the ties between the two
countries.
His Excellency Marcelino Medina led the Cuban
delegation for the Fifth Bilateral Consultations
between Cuba and Canada at Global Affairs Canada
on March 5. His visit underscored the importance
of the historic 75th anniversary of the
establishment of diplomatic relations between Cuba
and Canada.
First Deputy Minister Medina's agenda also
included a visit to Quebec City where he met with
Sylvie Barcelo, Deputy Minister of International
Relations, La Francophonie and the Québec-Cuba
working group on March 2.
First Deputy Minister Medina (fifth from left) is
received at Global Affairs Canada, March 5, 2020.
First Deputy Minister Medina (centre), Cuban
Ambassador to Canada Josefina Vidal (fourth from
right), Cuban Consul in Montreal Mara Bilbao
(second from right) and others visit Quebec's
National Assembly, March 2, 2020.
Remarks of First Deputy Foreign Minister at
Ottawa Reception
Dear Mr. David Morrison, Foreign and Defence
Policy Advisor to the Prime Minister,
Dear guests,
It is an honour to be here with you on this night
of celebration of the 75th anniversary of
uninterrupted bilateral relations between Canada
and Cuba.
We are pleased to have built strong and fruitful
exchanges over these years in several sectors, in
particular, in the economic-commercial area,
culture and tourism.
There is a long-standing tradition of
people-to-people contacts between our two
countries. Canada has established itself as Cuba's
main source market for tourists. For nine
consecutive years, more than one million Canadian
tourists have come to our country every year.
Canada is one of our main business partners in
the world and is one of the largest investors in
our country. Official cooperation remains active
with projects in priority sectors for the
country's economic and social development.
Investments by major Canadian companies are found
in the sectors of mining, energy, oil and gas,
agri-food industry and tourism.
The good state of our bilateral relations is
based on mutual respect and sovereign equality.
The political dialogue at different levels and the
broad exchange of visits that have taken place in
the last few years have allowed us to work
together and to continue developing our relations
for mutual benefit and to keep a constructive
understanding, even when we have different points
of view on some issues of the international
agenda.
Dear friends:
Cubans shall not forget that Canada was among the
few countries that didn't break diplomatic
relations with Cuba in the 1960s, we won't forget
that Canada has been there for us promoting
relations with our country, even in difficult
circumstances.
We appreciate Canada's strong position regarding
the blockade by the United States and the
implementation of extraterritorial measures; and
against the implementation of Title III of the Helms-Burton
Act, which has damaged our people so much.
We deeply appreciate the solidarity of the
Canadian people towards our country in defence of
our sovereignty. Many of the successes that our
country has achieved in all these long years,
would have not been possible without the support
of solidarity organizations from around the globe,
including the Canadian solidarity [organizations],
a number of whose representatives are here.
In the context of this celebration, we reiterate
our willingness to keep on working to further
expand, strengthen and diversify the political
dialogue and bilateral ties with the Canadian
government so that we can capitalize on all the
potential both our countries have.
We are certain that the Canadian government and
the business community will continue to play a
critical role in our country's plans for economic
development.
In honour to the historic ties between our
peoples and governments, I invite you to celebrate
together the 75th anniversary of our relations.
Thank you very much.
Latvian Exhibit in Ottawa
Exhibition at Canadian War Museum (Embassy of Latvia)
The Canadian War Museum in Ottawa is featuring a
special exhibit titled "The Latvian Tragedy --
1941." The exhibit coincides with Latvia's use of
March 16, to hail Nazi collaborators in that
country as freedom fighters and to declare that in
1941 the Soviet Union, which was the first country
to seriously prepare to counter the Nazi assault
on itself and all of Europe, was the invader, not
Hitler's Germany. The exhibit runs from March
3-22, 2020.[1]
The exhibit, presented by the Embassy of Latvia,
is a joint venture of Latvia's Museum of the
Occupation and the Museum of Jews in Latvia. In
the promotional flyer, the Latvian historians who
authored the exhibit claim that the main
motivation for the exhibit is to declare that the
"Republic of Latvia, restored in 1991, condemns
all perpetrators of crimes against humanity in the
tragic year 1941." In fact, the exhibit is full of
gross distortions and falsifications of the
history of Latvia and the battles waged by the
Soviet Union and the peoples of Eastern Europe
against the German fascist aggressors. The
dishonesty can be seen in the opportunistic use of
the vicious persecution of Latvian Jews. More than
80 per cent of Latvian Jews were brutally murdered
during this period but the exhibit purposely
forgets to mention that as the German Nazis swept
into Latvia in June 1941 they found willing
accomplices in the rounding up and murdering of
Jews by a Latvian organization called Arajs
Kommando. This organization was led by Victor
Arajs, a rabid anti-communist and anti-Semite who
not only assisted the German fascists in the
extermination of Jews, but was also responsible
for the most brutal crimes against the Roma and
mentally ill people.
A panel in the exhibit depicts the story of Frida
Michelson, one of the a few survivors of the
infamous Rumbula massacre. The exhibit bemoans the
fact that more than 28,000 Jews were killed in the
Rumbula Forest near Riga from November 30 to
December 8, 1941, but it fails to explain that
this mass extermination of Jews from Riga was
carried out by members of the Arajs Kommando, in
collaboration with the German Nazis. In her
testimony as a witness in the trial of Karlis
Detlays in New York City in 1979, Mrs. Michelson
identified him as the Latvian and Nazi
collaborator who ordered her to remove her clothes
and valuables before she was driven to the ditch
where the mass executions took place. In addition
to the massacre at Rumbula Forest, the Arajs
Komando were responsible for mass killings in
Jelgava, Daugavpils, Liepaja, and Riga. None of
this is brought out in the exhibit, which portrays
Nazi collaborators as national heroes fighting for
Latvian freedom against alleged Soviet aggression.
Official Canadian liberal ideology is
anti-communist and also spreads the misconception
that Russia was an aggressor and collaborated with
Hitler based on the non-aggression pact it signed
with Germany in 1939, while remaining silent about
the Anglo-French collaboration at Munich which
betrayed the peoples of Europe and permitted the
Nazi aggressions, occupations and murders to take
place.
Latvian collaborators with the Nazis detain the
Jewish population of Riga,
before taking them to be executed and buried en
masse, 1941.
In 1943, Arajs Kommando was incorporated into the
Latvian Legion, which became known as the Latvian
Waffen SS Legion. In July 1943 the Latvian Legion,
in its mission "Winterzauber" (Wintercharm)
together with seven Latvian police battalions were
involved in destroying a swathe of countryside
some 40 kilometres wide alongside the Latvian
frontier. Several hundred villages were destroyed
with tens of thousands of inhabitants killed. This
was a crime of the Latvian Legion itself. For his
many war crimes Arajs was captured, tried and
sentenced to life imprisonment.[2] The exhibit at
the Canadian war museum fails to explain that this
is the same Latvian Waffen SS Legion which is
honoured every year on March 16 with a parade
through the streets of Riga. Last year, Latvia's
Foreign Minister Artis Pabriks drew international
scorn when he proclaimed the Latvian SS Legion to
be heroes. Dr. Efraim Zuroff, Head of the Simon
Wiesenthal Center in Jerusalem, spoke out against
the March 16 events in Riga. He said, "In reality
the ceremony was in certain respects only the tip
of a very dangerous iceberg that is attempting to
rewrite the history books and create a false
symmetry or equalization of communist and Nazi
crimes. While the march was not organized by the
government, it is obvious that there is a strong
support for its message among Latvian leaders."
Far from condemning these perpetrators of
murderous crimes, the Canadian War Museum, in
collaboration with the Latvian government, is
participating in the falsification of history to
cover up the crimes of Nazi collaborators, thus
preparing for new crimes under the guise of
defending the "independence of Latvia."
Attempts to equate German fascism with the Soviet
Union by accusing the Soviet Union of aggression
and occupation of Latvia or anywhere else during
World War II is to turn truth on its head. It was
German fascism's unbridled imperialism with the
aim of world domination which posed the greatest
threat to the peoples of Eastern Europe and it was
the actions taken by the Soviet Union at that time
which laid the foundation for defeating the Nazi
invaders. Far from being an aggressor, as the
exhibit falsely claims, the Soviet Union during
the period of the non-aggression pact with Germany
on September 3, 1939, moved Red Army troops into
Poland, Western Byelorussia and Western Ukraine
and established defences along this line. The
Soviet Union also signed pacts of mutual
assistance with the Baltic states and Soviet army
garrisons were established on the territory of
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.
A pamphlet issued by the Soviet Information Bureau
in February 1948 called Falsificators of
History explained the importance of
establishing the "Eastern front:" "it was not hard
to see that the creation of an 'Eastern' front was
an important contribution not only to the
organization of the security of the USSR but to
the common cause of the peace-loving states that
were fighting against Hitler's aggression.
Nevertheless, the answer of Anglo-Franco-American
circles in their overwhelming majority was to
remain silent about their appeasement of Hitler in
Munich and start a malicious anti-Soviet campaign
describing the Soviet action as aggression."[3]
Anyone who visits the exhibition in the war museum
will see that the content is just the continuation
of this malicious anti-Soviet campaign. In fact,
the measures taken by the Soviet Union under the
leadership of J.V. Stalin and the enormous
sacrifices made by the Soviet Red Army -- at all
times facing 85 per cent of the elite German
Wehrmacht -- led to victory in liberating all of
Eastern Europe and changed the course of world
history. By hosting this exhibit and promoting the
lies of the Latvian government, the government of
Canada and the War Museum are openly promoting
Nazism in the name of defending freedom and human
rights. They condemn themselves as extremists and
hate-mongers despite claims that they oppose all
extremes. Theirs is a betrayal of all Canadians,
especially Canada's World War II anti-fascist
veterans, along with all the Allied Armed Forces
and resistance fighters who fought and died in the
battle to defeat fascism. Most importantly, this
is not about the past but the present. Today,
Canada has about 540 Canadian Army members in
Latvia as part of a NATO deployment who are made
to participate in ceremonies honouring Nazi
collaborators, with the claim that they were
freedom fighters or that these are official
duties. It must not pass!
The War Museum deserves to be condemned for this
exhibit, which falsifies what Canadians stand for.
Notes
1. The War Museum has
announced via its website, "Due to the COVID-19
virus, the national museums have made the decision
to close the museums across Canada to visitors and
all other groups, effective Saturday, March 14 and
until further notice. [...]"
2. "Riga,Viktor Arajs,
March 16, the Latvian Legion and the Holocaust" by
Clemens Heni, Wissenschaft und Publizistik als
Kritik, March 22, 2010.
3. Falsificators of History
-- text of a communique issued by the Soviet
Information Bureau, Moscow, February, 1948.
(To access articles
individually click on the black headline.)
PDF
PREVIOUS ISSUES
| HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|