For Your Information
New Self-Serving Definition of "Fundamental Corporate Commitment"
In August of 2019, the U.S. Business Roundtable, made up of
nearly 200 of the country's largest corporations and banks,
issued a new "Statement on the purpose of a
corporation."[1]
For a
number of decades, the Business Roundtable has endorsed
principles of shareholder primacy -- that corporations exist
principally to serve shareholders. In this, they were following
the dictum of the economist Milton Friedman that "the one and
only social responsibility of business ... is to increase
profits." However, the Business Roundtable appears
to have changed its
tune. In the Preamble to the new statement, it now claims that
the language of the old one regarding responsibility "does not
accurately describe the ways in which we and our fellow CEOs
endeavor every day to create value for all our stakeholders,
whose long-term interests are inseparable." It goes on to say
that "While each of our individual companies serves its own
corporate purpose, we share a fundamental commitment to all of
our stakeholders," i.e. not just shareholders. In
the statement, the CEOs, who represent many of the biggest
corporations in the U.S. such as BlackRock, Vanguard, Apple,
American Express, Lockheed Martin, Goldman Sachs, Walmart,
Bechtel, Boeing, and Exxon, and others, now pledge commitment to
a range of "stakeholders" by "delivering value to our customers
... investing in employees [which] starts with compensating them
fairly and providing important benefits ... dealing fairly and
ethically with our suppliers ... supporting the communities in
which we work ... protect[ing] the environment by embracing
sustainable practices across our businesses." And, at the very
end of the list, is "generating long-term value for
shareholders." Indeed, there have been various
phases over the last 100+ years as
to how the oligarchs have described their purpose, depending on the
arrangements necessary at the time to advance their interests
and
the "spin" that goes along with it. For these CEO proponents of
American pragmatic theory, there is no objective reality. Truth is what
"works" in their interest and, to them, reality is only a construct.
Thus the financial oligarchy can conjure up new "realities" about the
aims and purpose of their enterprises. But once one of these realities
stops producing the results they desire, another must be
substituted in order to continue to advance their interest. Thus the
Business Roundtable CEOs can claim with all certainty one year that
their rapacious monopolies serve only shareholders and now say they
serve "stakeholders" including workers, suppliers,
communities and
so on. For these CEO proponents of American
pragmatic theory, there
is no objective reality. Truth is what "works" in their interest
and, to them, reality is only a construct. Thus the financial
oligarchy can conjure up new "realities" about the aims and
purpose of their enterprises. But once one of these realities
stops working or is discredited another must be substituted in
order to continue to advance their interest. Thus the Business
Roundtable CEOs can claim with all certainty one year that their
rapacious monopolies serve only shareholders. Yet the next year,
the leopard spots magically change, and the monopolies claim to
"create value" for a range of stakeholders which includes
workers, suppliers, communities and so on. Besides
obscuring that it is the working people acting on
nature who create all new value, what this pragmatic thinking and
demagogy covers up is that the current financial oligarchy has
had two fundamental aims since the rise of the monopoly
capitalist system and imperialism at the beginning of the 20th
century. These are: 1) striving for maximum profits by
whatever means necessary; 2) preserving, maintaining and
expanding their exploitive system, both nationally and
internationally. Why are these CEOs resetting their
avowed purpose now? When
Milton Friedman's dictum of shareholder primacy was adopted back
in the 1980s and '90s, this was actually a time when the
financial oligarchy had launched a renewed offensive against the
workers and people of the U.S., Canada and the world using
neo-liberal dogmas, like the claim of shareholder primacy, as
justification to slash wages and pensions, privatize public
institutions, cut social programs, and other anti-social
behavior. "Greed is good," was a Friedman-like mantra of that
time and pursuit of private interest was presented as the highest
virtue. Today, in 2020, the financial oligarchy is
also on a renewed
offensive, but the conditions are different than the 1980s. In
order to achieve maximum profits and preserve the system, it must
further loot the huge reservoir of social wealth created by
working people in the U.S. and abroad. This looting has been
going on in direct and indirect ways since the rise of monopoly
capitalism many decades ago. But in the wake of the 2008
financial crisis and now the COVID-19 debacle, it has been ramped
up to an unprecedented degree. Herein lies the
dilemma for the Business Roundtable CEOs.
How can they justify following the Friedman dictum of being only
responsible to their wealthy shareholders, yet going, year after
year, with outstretched palms to demand literally trillions of
dollars from the public purse? No, the CEOs must now proclaim that they
have found a new "social responsibility" to all the "stakeholders" in
society; and thus, in turn, the implication is
that society must be prepared to permanently backstop the big
banks and corporations with trillions of public funds, through
bailouts, public-private partnerships, privatizations, subsidies,
tax cuts and other means. The Roundtable's
statement lies within the recent thrust of
the Davos World Economic Forum to push for "stakeholder
capitalism" and a "better kind of capitalism." The billionaires
of Davos want all of civil society to fall in line behind their
agenda, as do the CEOs of the Roundtable. Above all, they do not
want an alternative agenda to develop that is put forward by an
empowered working class and people. Despite all their talk
about "social responsibility," the oligarchs continue unabated to
exploit the very "stakeholders" they claim to be serving. The
leopard has not and cannot change its spots. Note
1. "Statement
on
the purpose of a corporation," Business Roundtable, June 14,
2020.
This article was published in
Volume 50 Number 33 - September 5,
2020
Article Link:
For Your Information: New Self-Serving Definition of "Fundamental Corporate Commitment"
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|