British Government Ignores People Who Die in Care Homes
On April 17, the British government admitted for
the first time that the figures of the deaths of people in care homes
and the community from COVID-19 were false. Matt Hancock, Secretary of
State for Health, confirmed that the figures had been "substantially
underestimated" as he appeared before the Commons Select Committee. He
admitted that there had been more deaths of care home residents than
had so far been reported by the Office of National Statistics (ONS),
and the share of deaths taking place in homes was higher than so far
reported. "I have asked the CQC [Care Quality Commission] to make sure
we record the deaths of those who are residents of care homes. They
started to collect that data yesterday and it will start to be
published shortly."
The Health Service Journal
commented: "The size of the discrepancy for only a single week to April
3 suggests that a figure of 1,400 total deaths in care homes from
COVID-19 given by Care England this week may be a substantial
underestimate."[1]
With no hard data
being recorded by the government and ONS, the National Care Forum after
doing a survey demonstrated "a significant increase in
coronavirus-related deaths within care homes," which when scaled up
suggest that "more than 2,500 care home residents may have died in the
homes of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 during last week alone,
representing a 193 per cent increase. This analysis suggests that a
total of 4,040 people may have died of this illness within UK
residential and nursing services before April 13. Factoring in the
deaths of individuals who were admitted to hospitals, the figure is a
tragic 7,337 deaths amongst our most vulnerable communities."[2]
This government admission shows more than the
criminal way in which it is handling the COVID-19 pandemic by ignoring
the deaths of patients dying in care homes. This miscounting of deaths
shows the whole disregard for human life that has always been evident
with the ruling elite and successive British governments. For example,
for many years, the "winter crisis" in the National Health Service has
seen the unnecessary deaths of patients due to lack of beds, trolley
waits and so on, which has never been formally recorded and highlighted
by government, let alone the tragic loss of life in care homes in the
present pandemic. Also, during the Iraq war, not only did the Blair
government of the time criminally commit war crimes by invading Iraq,
but it also refused to count the hundreds of thousands killed or maimed
in Iraq by their invasion. The pandemic in this respect is playing the
role of exposing the criminal disregard and contempt for human life of
those in power whose outlook is to serve private interests, not
safeguard human life and the public well-being.
Indeed, one of the striking features of the Coronavirus
Act 2020, which received Royal Assent on March 25, is its
perspective of "a reduced workforce, increased pressure on health
services and death management processes" and to "introduce new
statutory powers which are designed to mitigate these impacts," as the
Explanatory Notes to the Act state. The contrast between the
safeguarding of public health and well-being, including preventing
deaths from the disease, and the Act's focus on "a reduced workforce"
and "death management processes" is impossible to ignore.
Moreover, the
admission that the government's figures for deaths from COVID-19 are
wrong exposes the outdated and unacceptable arrangements, where the
lives and concerns of the people are ignored and where the health care
workers have little or no say in the arrangements. What health care
workers and the people in the community have been fighting for is the
necessity for a human-centred system of health and social care that
meets the needs of all for hospital, community, mental health and care
homes. Central to such a system is the necessity to empower health
workers and care workers to make the crucial decisions. This includes
the ability to mobilize the working class and people to their full
capacity and with their full involvement, especially in times of
crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Nothing less is acceptable.
Notes
1. "Care
home deaths substantially underestimated as Hancock moves to speed
reporting,"
by Dave West, Health
Service Journal, April 17, 2020.
2. "Ring
of steel needed to support care homes as deaths double in a week,"
National Care Forum press release, April 18, 2020.
This article was published in
![](http://cpcml.ca/Tmlw2019/Articles/Logo-TMLWeeklyIP-Small.jpg)
Volume 50 Number 14 - April 25, 2020
Article Link:
British Government Ignores People Who Die in Care Homes
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|