United States
Impeachment, Accountability and the Battle of Democracy
On December 18, the House of Representatives,
where the
Democratic Party representatives form a majority,
voted to
impeach President Donald Trump by passing two
motions: one
charges Trump with abuse of power and the other
with obstruction
of Congress. Under Senate rules, a Senate
impeachment trial starts the
day after the House provides it with the articles
of impeachment,
unless that day is a Sunday. To start the process
the Senate must first
vote on rules for its own impeachment trial and
what witnesses will be
invited/permitted. Republicans hold a 53-47
majority in the Senate, and
67 votes are required to convict a president.
However, after
voting to impeach the president, House Democrats
took a decision to delay transmitting the articles
of impeachment
to the Senate. Speaker of the House of
Representatives Nancy
Pelosi cited concerns that the Republicans in
control of the
Senate would not hold a "fair trial." In other
words, the
Democrats do not agree with the rules the
Republicans are seeking
to set for the Senate trial nor the witnesses
proposed, if any.
This is the first time the impeachment of a
president takes place
at a time both houses of Congress are not under
the command of
the same party. It is not clear whether the horse
trading taking
place will get either party the votes it wants in
this matter.
Given how the vying factions among the rulers and
their
representatives are currently lining up, few think
the
impeachment of the president will succeed.
Meanwhile, both Houses
are scheduled to take a two-week break for the
holidays.
What is nonetheless clear from the on-going
spectacle in the
House of Representatives is that impeachment does
not in fact
hold the president accountable for his actions and
the entire
thing serves to deprive the American people of a
vantage point
which favours their striving for empowerment.
Pelosi has emphasized that "The president must be
held
accountable, and no one is above the law."
Impeachment is
presented as a mechanism for accountability, and
more generally
the effort is supposed to send the message to the
public that the "system works" when it comes to
this problem. They do not need to
fight for new arrangements.
In fact the current arrangements are not sorting
out the
fighting between the factions of the ruling class.
The civil war
scenario between the ruling factions in the U.S.,
as well as the
very limited articles of impeachment being
presented -- for abuse
of power, but only concerning the Ukraine/Biden
affair, and
obstruction of justice -- create doubt that
impeachment will hold
President Trump accountable.
This is clearly true for the crimes of greatest
concern to the
people, completely absent from the articles of
impeachment even
though there is far more evidence. These include
the crimes of
family separation and detention camps of children,
even babies.
They include the war crimes, such as those against
Yemen, Iraq
and Afghanistan, through use of drones and
chemical weapons and
more. They include collective punishment of whole
populations
using sanctions, such as against Venezuela, Cuba,
the Democratic
People's Republic of Korea, Iran and many
others.
Voice of Revolution, newspaper of the U.S.
Marxist-Leninist Organization, notes that people
across the
country, joined by many abroad have persisted in
waging battles
for rights and demanding change on these matters.[1] It writes:
"Impeachment provides no accountability for
government refusal
to do so. The many actions included thousands more
worldwide
actions to defend Mother Earth, November 29, and
continuing weekly
demonstrations across the country in many places;
continuing
united actions both sides of the southern border
defending
migrants as well as the recent not guilty verdict
of an activist
who aided two young migrants crossing the desert
in Arizona;
anti-war actions, including those against NATO in
London, New York
City and elsewhere; strikes by teachers taking
social
responsibility for problems like homelessness and
lack of
counselors and nurses in their schools; and many
more.
"These battles for
democracy contribute to the efforts all
across the country to give voice to the demands of
the people and
to affirm their rights. They also raise the
central issue of
today's battle of democracy, of who decides, the
minority or the
majority? The battle of democracy is the battle to
advance the
content and form of democracy and the institutions
for it so as
to bring it on a par with modern times. Empowering
the people,
the majority to govern and decide, is required.
That is the
democracy that would put in place the means to
have the anti-war,
pro-social will of the people -- readily apparent
in the many
united actions, meetings, petitions, strikes --
implemented. This
is precisely what the rulers are striving to
prevent. Impeachment
is part of this effort to embroil everyone for and
against while
attempting to divert the drive of the people to
themselves be
decision-makers.
"U.S.-style democracy ensures a small minority
rules over the
majority, a problem impeachment does not solve.
Nor does it solve
the problem of accountability. The Constitution
and existing law
provide no mechanism for the people to hold the
president
accountable for crimes. The Justice Department has
long said it
is unconstitutional to charge a sitting president
and has not
done so. Nor can a citizen's arrest be made of a
sitting
president, given that any such effort would be
blocked by the
Secret Service and the citizen charged.
"The need to have a mechanism in the hands of the
people to
hold the president accountable for crimes brings
to the fore this
need to advance the battle of democracy -- the
battle for new
institutions of governance, a new constitution
that does provide
for accountability. People very much despise the
ability of
government, especially the president, to commit
crimes with
impunity. Even elections, given as the way to deal
with this
issue, do not provide a means to bring criminal
charges. Indeed,
like impeachment, they are yet another mechanism
where the people
do not decide the outcome; the rulers, the
minority do.
"The battle of democracy is the battle of
political power, the
battle for new arrangements that empower the
people to govern and
decide. A new constitution and institutions should
serve to
harmonize the many human relations of the present,
the whole
ensemble of relations between humans and humans
and humans and
nature. Harmonizing and providing for
accountability are
interrelated, so this issue too must be addressed.
Steps in this
direction today include stepping up organized
efforts for the
people, as individuals and collectives, to speak
out in their own
name, voice their concerns, stick to their own
agenda for the
change needed. It includes discussing and debating
this problem
of accountability, what is needed for it and how
achieving it is
related to advancing the battle of the people to
govern and
decide."
Note
1. Voice of
Revolution, December 13, 2019.
This article was published in
Volume 49 Number 32 - December 21, 2019
Article Link:
United States: Impeachment, Accountability and The Battle of Democracy
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|