For
Your Information
Production and Sale of War Materiel
The U.S. and other governments generally
contract for the
purchase of war materiel from private companies.
This means
political control is fundamentally important for
those who profit
from the production of war materiel and services.
A recent
example of the importance of political control is
Amazon losing a
$10 billion Pentagon "cloud" contract to its
competitor
Microsoft. Amazon immediately launched a legal
challenge to the
decision and directly attacked the Trump
administration accusing
it of interference in the awarding of the
contract. The
antagonism between President Trump and Amazon and
in particular
its CEO Jeff Bezos, the owner and publisher of the
Washington
Post is intense.[1]
Many of the largest
companies involved in the war economy use
the guaranteed state military contracts as a base
to build their
sales in non-military goods and services. An
example is Boeing,
the second-largest arms producer in the world. It
registered
$29.2 billion in arms sales at home and abroad in
2018, which
acted as a 29 per cent anchor or platform for its
total realized
gross income from sales of $101.1 billion.
The Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute (SIPRI)
annually compiles data on global military sales,
excluding China.
The data for 2018 show 43 companies based in the
U.S. had a total
gross income of $246 billion from the sale of
military goods and
services at home and abroad. This represents a 7.2
per cent
increase in sales compared with 2017 and accounts
for 59 per cent
of the total gross income from arms sales of the
largest 100
companies worldwide. The data does not include the
research,
production and sales at government owned military
enterprises or "in-house" maintenance of military
assets.
Regarding the significance of arms sales in
relation to total
military spending, SIPRI writes, "In general,
spending on
weapons, weapons systems and platforms, and other
specifically
military equipment (including the research and
development for
such equipment) forms no more than a third of
military spending,
and much less in non-arms producing countries. In
the USA,
procurement and research and development have
usually accounted
for about 30 per cent of total 'National Defense'
outlays since
2005."
The five biggest arms producers in the world are
based in the
United States and alone accounted for $148 billion
in gross
income and 35 percent of the total arms sales of
the top 100
companies in 2018. They are:
Lockheed Martin Corp. $47.26 billion in
military gross
income: Lockheed Martin, the largest arms
producer in the
world saw its arms sales grow 5.2 per cent in
2018, which
amounted to 11 per cent of the gross income of the
top 100
companies worldwide. Lockheed Martin produces the
F-35 combat
aircraft purchased by many countries within the
U.S.-led
imperialist system of states.
Boeing $29.15 billion: The arms sales of
Boeing, the
second-largest arms producer in the world, grew
5.7 per cent in
2018 and totalled 6.9 per cent of global sales of
the 100 biggest
companies.
Northrop Grumman Corp. $26.19 billion:
Northrop
Grumman's arms sales grew by 14 per cent in 2018,
an increase of
$3.3 billion. This was driven in part by its
acquisition of arms
producer Orbital-ATK and strong domestic and
international demand
for its weapons, including intercontinental
ballistic missiles
and missile defence systems.[2]
Arms sales by Raytheon
at $23.44 billion (ranked fourth) rose
by 3.9 per cent.
Arms sales at General
Dynamics Corp climbed 10 per cent to $22
billion (ranked fifth).
Notes
1. The newspaper Business
Insider headlined on December 9, "Amazon
recently
lost out to Microsoft on a $10 billion
cloud-computing contract
for the Department of Defense.
"Amazon has challenged the decision on the Joint
Enterprise
Defense Infrastructure contract, alleging in court
that President
Donald Trump's bias against Amazon played a role
in the
decision.
"In documents made public Monday, Amazon said
Trump led
‘repeated public and behind-the-scenes attacks' to
ensure Amazon
didn't get the contract in order to harm CEO Jeff
Bezos, ‘his
perceived political enemy.'
"Trump has not hidden his dislike of Amazon: He's
accused the
company of 'getting away with murder on tax' and
accused Bezos of
using the publication he owns, the Washington
Post, as a
'lobbyist weapon.'"
2. A development in the
U.S. arms
industry in 2018 was the growing trend in
consolidations among
some of the largest arms producers. For example,
two of the top
five, Northrop Grumman and General Dynamics, made
multibillion-dollar acquisitions in 2018. SIPRI
writes, "'U.S.
companies are preparing for the new arms
modernization programme
that was announced in 2017 by President Trump,'
says Aude
Fleurant, Director of SIPRI's Arms and Military
Expenditure
Programme. 'Large U.S. companies are merging to be
able to
produce the new generation of weapon systems and
therefore be in
a better position to win contracts from the U.S.
Government.'
"The summary of the U.S. 2018 National Defense
Strategy
published by the administration of President
Donald J. Trump
stated that the current security environment was
characterized
by ‘Inter-state strategic competition' and that
the U.S. military
advantage had atrophied and needed to be rebuilt
in order to
address the strategic competition from China and
Russia. This
document emphasized the USA's commitment to
continue with and
strengthen its large-scale arms modernization
programme announced
in 2017. Following this announcement, several U.S.
arms companies
included in the Top 100 merged or acquired other
companies'
business segments in 2017 and 2018, partly with
the aim of
gaining an advantage over their competitors. The
larger deals
included Northrop Grumman's acquisition of
Orbital-ATK, United
Technologies' acquisition of Rockwell Collins, and
General Dynamics' acquisition of CSRA. There were
also transactions of a
smaller scale such as CACI International's
acquisition of a
business unit of General Dynamics, and Engility's
acquisition of
the information technology (IT) segment of SAIC."
"The main motivation for the consolidations in
2017 and 2018
was the USA's comprehensive and ambitious arms
modernization
programme aimed at designing and producing a new
generation of
weapon systems."
3. In addition to details on the 100 largest
arms-producing
and military services companies: "SIPRI has
information on total
military expenditure for each country with a
specific category
for spending on arms. Military expenditure is
defined as spending
on the military in general, including spending on
personnel (i.e.
the salaries and benefits of troops and civilian
staff),
operations and maintenance (i.e. spending on
general supplies,
services and transport), equipment (e.g. arms,
other military
equipment and non-military equipment),
construction (e.g. of
military bases) and research and development."
For the full report from SIPRI for 2018, click
here.
This article was published in
Volume 49 Number 32 - December 21, 2019
Article Link:
For
Your Information: Production and Sale of War Materiel
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|