Low Level of Political Discourse and Destruction of Politics
- Anna Di Carlo -
The Speech from the Throne, according to the
authoritative text by Senator Eugene Forsey, is supposed to provide
"the government's view of the condition of the country and the policies
it will follow, and the bills it will introduce to deal with that
condition." The December 5 Throne Speech did not address the condition
in which the country finds itself, especially the deepening crisis of
the political institutions, which have lost the ability to give rise to
a government that is viewed as being based on the consent of the
people. Far from it, the Speech from the Throne boasted that the
"parliamentary system is a bedrock of our stability." Addressing MPs
and Senators, the government through its Throne Speech said their role
in the democratic process is a privilege and responsibility, and
expressed confidence that they, "embrace it, respecting the wishes and
protecting the rights of all. Because we serve every single Canadian."
The Liberals
claim that they can divine the "will of the
people," which, the Throne Speech says, was to send a clear
message through the election of a minority government that they
want their parliamentarians to work together and "deliver on a
plan that moves our country forward for all Canadians." This is
then said to mean that "parliamentarians received a mandate from
the people of Canada" to take up the most recent rendition of
how the Liberals say they have been fighting climate change,
strengthening the middle class, working for Indigenous
reconciliation, and keeping Canadians safe and healthy. Their new
mantra to excuse whatever they did or did not do during their
first tenure in office is "there is still much work to do."
Recurring throughout the Throne Speech was the
message that the government will continue with its schemes to enrich
the corporations and follow the dictate of the financial oligarchs to
make them competitive, expressed as "positioning Canada for success in
an uncertain world." It will continue to "seek out opportunities for
Canadian commerce, ingenuity and enterprise." In addition, the Speech
made it clear that the government plans to continue its participation
in undermining the rule of law and the sovereignty of other countries,
because, it said, "Canadians expect their leaders to stand up for the
values and interests that are the core of Canada's security --
democracy, human rights and respect for international law." It promised
to renew its commitment to NATO, UN Peacekeeping and the rules-based
international order and to continue the pursuit of a seat for Canada on
the UN Security Council.
The same section of the speech promotes the
multilateralism said
to be Canada's specialty: "As a coalition-builder, the Government
will build partnerships with like-minded countries to put
Canada's expertise to work on a global scale, in areas like the
promotion of democracy and human rights, the fight against
climate change and for environmental protection, and the
development and ethical use of artificial intelligence."
The appeal for parliamentarians to find the way to
work
together is reiterated in the conclusion of the speech: "In this
43rd Parliament, you will disagree on many things. But you will
agree on a great many more. Focus on your shared purpose: making
life better for the people you serve. Never forget that it is an
honour to sit in this Parliament. Prove to Canadians that you are
worthy holders of these seats, and worthy stewards of this
place."
No matter how much talk there was about
parliamentarians
working together to address the problems facing Canadians, the
Throne Speech confirms the condition of the political process as
one that can no longer perform its role of sorting out relations
between electors and the elected or between rival factions of the
ruling elite vying for power. After much hyperbole about Canada's
Parliament being "one of the most enduring and vital institutions
in the democratic world," in the end the last word came straight
from the medieval era that gave rise to the process Canadians
continue to be saddled with: in carrying out their duties
and responsibilities, MPs and Senators are to let themselves be guided
by
Divine Providence.
The Need for a New Political Process Fit for the
Times
The role being played by the political process is
to
destroy the very source of political power, the polity.
This was clearly seen during the election that gave rise to the
government. The competition among the members of the cartel of
political parties vying to form a government lowered the level of
discourse as never before. The concerns of the people, the actual
conditions of work and living, were only raised and discussed by
parties such as the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) that
are intent on providing society with an aim on par with the
demand of the times. This low level of discourse of the cartel
parties was a mind-numbing factor contributing to the
destruction of politics. The whole "campaign" served to leave the
polity aimless, something no one can get on board with.
Furthermore, the election saw the use of
defamation and dirty
ops in another unprecedented assault on the polity. CPC(M-L) does
not agree with the positions of Maxime Bernier and his People's
Party but the "war-room" gratuitous attacks launched by a liberal
media firm paid for by a conservative third party show the sordid
level to which the politics of the country have been lowered.
Similarly, the endless repetition of decontextualized comments by
Elizabeth May to fit her persona into a stereotype that another
party's campaign clearly thought would undermine the Green Party
vote is without any honour whatsoever. The duplicity and
corruption of these practices is such that the party and its
leader who waged this campaign claim to stand with all those
who are discriminated against but have no qualms about defaming their
adversaries.
CPC(M-L) will
never agree with such things. In contrast, its
own call to humanize the natural and social environment by
upholding the dignity of labour, defending the rights of all and
making Canada a zone for peace provides an aim for the polity and
the society. This is of utmost importance because the way matters
stand in Canada, either the brutal dictate of the international
financial oligarchy will continue to wreak havoc across the country --
which today is particularly vicious in
Alberta, Ontario and Quebec -- or the people will take up the call
for an anti-war government that provides Canada with a new
direction for the economy, and for its foreign and domestic policy.
This call
provides an aim worthy of the Canadian, Quebec and Indigenous
peoples because it rejects colonial injustice, unfettered
exploitation of labour deprived of all rights and wars of
aggression and occupation abroad, all of which are carried out in the
name of high ideals
of peace, democracy and freedom.
Deliberation cannot take place so long as there is
an
executive with power over decision-making, as in Canada, which
appeases the United States as the indispensable nation, with its
nuclear weapons and the whole bureaucracy built around that,
including elections. Canada is integrated into the U.S. war
machine and NATO's Atlantic Council dictates the line of march
for the government and Parliament, and has even taken over the
"security" and policing of elections. In this situation, the conception
of political deliberation about war and peace,
crime and punishment, international trade and the national
economy are blown right out of the water. Everything is centred on the
rulers and their way of looking at the world, not that of the
people and their concerns.
An anti-war government does have a political
purpose and is
sustained based on politics, on informing and politicizing the
people to be decision-makers. We, the people, do not want to
destroy these massive human productive powers that the working
class has produced. We want the working class to control them, so
as to unleash that democratic personality of the New. This is the
demand the times are calling for so that the path to progress is
opened and the natural and social environments are humanized.
Rather
than try to achieve power themselves, the people are told they must
do "something else." As the 43rd Parliament opens, the "something else"
is said to be to scrutinize the Throne Speech and speculate as to what
they can expect from the government. At other times the people are told
the "something else" is to ensure the government's actions do not
violate the Charter of
Rights and Freedoms
contained in the Constitution. Rather than empowerment of the people
and organizing to achieve political power themselves, the role for the
people at other times is reduced to building coalitions and advocating
for whatever best new green deal package pops out of the woodwork or
reducing the issues and problems facing the country to choosing between
pipelines and the environment or growing the economy and protecting the
environment or endorsing some new agreement with the U.S. and Mexico
that promises to uphold "Canadian values." And to fight for those
"values" globally, the people are egged on to applaud Canada's
increasing participation in the NATO/U.S.-led wars of aggression under
the hoax that those wars, interference in the sovereign affairs of
others and violent regime change will bring those people to their
senses to adopt "Canadian values" as their own.
The
Throne Speech is part and parcel of a political process in the throes
of a legitimacy crisis. It hopes to provide legitimacy to a process
where none can be found but rather needs complete democratic renewal.
The existing political process serves only to entrench an absolute
power over the people who are thereby deprived of power. The times call
out for empowerment of the people to build the New!
This article was published in
Volume 49 Number 30 - December 7, 2019
Article Link:
Low Level of Political Discourse and Destruction of Politics - Anna Di Carlo
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|