Normandy Landing and the Re-Writing of History
- François Lazure -
In an article published on the 70th anniversary of
D-Day,
military historian Benoît Lemay, of the Royal Military College of
Kingston, Ontario pointed out, "There are many misconceptions
about the Normandy landing. It is believed to have enabled the
Allies to win the Second World War. A more nuanced view is
required. In fact, in June 1944, Germany had already lost. The
landing only served to accelerate the end of the war. It was the
Russians on the Eastern Front who did most of the work. For
propaganda reasons, during the Cold War years that followed, the
West would try to minimize the Soviet effort. It would be
conveyed that it was the Allies who did most of the
work."[1]
Lemay explained the motives behind the landing: "In
reality,
the Allies landed in France not only to defeat the Germans, but
also to ensure that Western Europe did not fall under the Soviet
yoke. There was a political aspect and economic
interests."[2]
During their meeting in Tehran at the end of November
1943,
the three leaders -- Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt -- agreed a
Second Front would be opened. It was the landing in Normandy on
June 6, 1944 that opened this Second Front, in the military
context created by the Red Army, where Germany had already lost
the war because of it and now had to fight on two sides.
According to the invasion plans, Caen was to be
liberated on
the evening of June 6 but the fighting was so fierce, it was only
finally liberated 40 days later on July 17. The French historian
Claude Quétel explains, "On June 22, 1944, a little more than a
fortnight after the Normandy landings -- and three years to the
day after the invasion of the Soviet Union by the Nazi armies --
Stalin attacked the Hitlerite troops from his side. The
objective: to hold down a maximum of German divisions in the East
to facilitate the progression of the Allies to the West. Stalin
went all out. For this operation, no less than 166 divisions,
1,300,000 men, 5,000 aircraft, 2,700 tanks were mobilized. The
main front is not the one thought to be in Normandy: it was in
the East."[3]
However, Quétel writes, "This Soviet offensive,
the largest
since the beginning of the war, has often been obscured in the
Western world because of the Cold War and rewriting of
history."[4]
Quétel tells us: "The Russian victories in
Stalingrad and
especially Kursk changed the game. The major risk for the
Anglo-Saxons was no longer to see Stalin sign a separate peace
with Hitler, but to see him win the final victory alone! It
became urgent to discuss strategy [...] with the Soviets. The
Tehran Conference brought Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin
together for the first time in this war."
Historian Antony Beevor summarized what happened a few
days
before the landing in Normandy: "Roosevelt wanted to remind his
subordinates that the Allies were not liberating France to
install General de Gaulle in power." The U.S goal was to "impose
a military government until elections were held," which would
take some time. This is why Roosevelt "insisted on creating an
occupation currency." The disagreements were serious in
Roosevelt's entourage, and "Churchill did his best to persuade
him that they had to work with de Gaulle."[5]
Roosevelt yielded. De Gaulle was
then made aware of the landing that had been planned without his
knowledge in his own country. He learned about it on June 4, the
day before the landing was originally scheduled to take place; it
was postponed a day due to bad weather. The "occupation" of part
of Europe would take place anyway, but without a U.S. "military
government" and its "occupation currency" in France.
In an interview, Beevor expressed the concern of the
Anglo-American Allies with regard to a surrender of Germany only
to the Soviet Union if the disembarkation of their troops was
delayed:
"Eisenhower's decision to launch the operations on June
6,
despite warnings from weather specialists, after a first
postponement on the 5th, was not only a courageous decision, it
was a historic stance. If he had said, 'we postpone the date,'
the next possible window was exactly in the middle of the great
storm of June 19, one of the worst in the [English] Channel. He
would therefore have again had to suspend operations probably
until the spring of 1945. This would have had unimaginable
consequences, not only for the secrecy of the operations and for
the maintenance for a very long time of the armada assembled in
Great Britain, but, especially during this period, the Red Army
would not only have arrived in Berlin, but would have had time to
cross the Rhine and go, why not? all the way to La Rochelle [...]
You can imagine the scene!"[6]
The decisive role of the Soviet Union in the military
defeat
of fascist Germany was accepted by everyone at the time such as
the President of the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt, who,
even before the landing at Normandy, on May 17, 1944, honoured
the city of Stalingrad declaring:
"In the name of the people of the United States of
America, I
present this scroll to the City of Stalingrad to commemorate our
admiration for its gallant defenders whose courage, fortitude,
and devotion during the siege of September 13, 1942 to January
31, 1943 will inspire forever the hearts of all free people.
Their glorious victory stemmed the tide of invasion and marked
the turning point in the war of the Allied Nations against the
forces of aggression."[7]
Nonetheless, the Anglo-American imperialists like to
claim
that they, not the Soviets, with the invasion of Normandy were
the decisive force in defeating Hitler. The D-Day Commemorations
are used to make this claim and do warmongering propaganda
against Russia today. This does a great disservice not only to
the peoples of the former Soviet Union whose sacrifice in the war
literally saved Europe, but also to the anti-fascist forces in
Britain, the U.S., Canada and the European countries who fought
heroically to do their part in the war. It is done to claim that
wars of aggression and occupation today are for democracy, peace
and freedom which dishonours the anti-fascist contribution of the
soldiers who fought in the Second Front even more.
Notes
1. La Presse, June
6, 2014. Translated from French by TML.
2. Ibid.
3. Le Monde-Hors série:
1944/Débarquements, résistances, libérations,
May-July
2014,
La
bataille de Normandie en neufs points, pp.20-23. Quote
translated from French by TML.
4. Ibid.
5. Antony Beevor, The Second
World War, Little, Brown and Company, New York, 2012.
6. Antony Beevor, "Ce
n'était pas
gagné d'avance," Le Point,
June
5,
2014,
pp.58-62.
Quote
translated
from
French
by
TML.
7. J.V. Stalin, Correspondence
with Franklin D.
Roosevelt and
Harry S. Truman, Vol. 2 (1941-1945), footnote no. 67.
This article was published in
Volume 49 Number 20 - June 1, 2019
Article Link:
: Normandy Landing and the Re-Writing of History - François Lazure
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|