Disinformation Over What's at
Stake
Attacks Against Huawei Have Nothing to Do with Rule of Law
- Louis Lang -
The attacks against Huawei and individual officers
of
the
company come at a time when inter-monopoly competition in the
high-tech communications sector becomes fiercer each day.
Invoking the rule of law to justify Canada's arrest of a
Huawei executive rings hollow when we see the elaborate
international U.S. campaign to discredit and undermine Huawei.
This includes international political and military threats
designed to intimidate countries to stop them from incorporating
Huawei technologies in their 5G networks.
The latest example of this vast U.S. campaign was
on
evidence
at a recent international technology show held the last week of
February in Barcelona, Spain. Called MWC Barcelona, it is a
four-day industry show of mobile devices and innovations with
over 100,000 visitors.
It has been reported that the U.S. government
sent a
large
delegation to Barcelona to warn international telecom executives
not to trust Huawei. A report on the CTV News website, titled
"U.S.-China battle over Huawei comes to head at tech show,"
quoted one of the participants, who expressed his concern as
follows:
"The geopolitical tensions between the USA and
China
will
undoubtedly be a hot topic at MWC, particularly in the context of
Huawei," said Shaun Collins, CEO of research firm CCS Insight.
"There is little doubt that operators around the world are
concerned that draconian sanctions on their ability to use
Huawei's 5G infrastructure could have detrimental effects on
their 5G roll-out plans."
The report went on to describe the work of U.S.
representatives behind the scenes to suggest that Ericsson of
Sweden and Finland's Nokia should be the preferred suppliers of
5G equipment.
Huawei also had a very large presence in
Barcelona and
promoted its equipment by drawing attention to its lower cost 5G
networks with the promise of "lightning fast download speeds and
less signal lag -- advancements that will help develop
self-driving cars, factory robots and remote surgery."[1]
It is clear that this belligerent activity of the
U.S.
is
becoming more and more aggressive and is interfering in the right
of countries to decide for themselves, based on their own
situation, the kind of telecommunications system that best serves
their
needs. The U.S. has been justifying this blatant attack on Huawei
by claiming threats to its national security, accusing the
telecom
company of enabling Chinese espionage all over the world. This
amounts to nothing more than the pot calling the kettle
black.
It is a fact that
since the
end of WWII the U.S. has systematically established a vast
worldwide
espionage network. The creation of a National Security State
became a
priority of the Truman administration to defend the U.S. against
the
"communist threat" from the USSR which was described at the time
as not
only a threat to U.S. national security but a threat to
"civilization
itself."[2]
The National Security Council (NSC) was created
in July
1947
as part of a general reorganization of the U.S. National Security
Apparatus. The function of the NSC, as outlined in the 1947 Act
was to advise the President on integration of domestic, foreign
and military policies relating to national security and to
facilitate inter-agency cooperation.
In addition to the establishment of systems and
organizations
of international espionage (CIA), the National Security Agency
(NSA) was created in 1952 to provide signals intelligence
(SIGINT) and security for computer network operations (CNO),
which is now known as cyber security.
At the time President Truman denied that this
would
involve
espionage and covert operations to support foreign policy
objectives, but these types of activities were undertaken on an
ever broadening scale. In fact one of the first actions of the
NSC was to authorize covert interference in the Italian election
in April 1948.
The formal institutionalization of covert actions
was
established as NSC 4 in December 1947 and NSC 10/2 in June
1948.
The National Security State has since grown to
include
at least 17 different agencies, which have been responsible for
countless criminal actions that include acts of state terrorism
to impose U.S. imperialist interests in country after country
throughout the world.
Although the spying activities of U.S. security
forces
on its
own citizens and against people fighting against colonialism and
imperialism worldwide have been exposed on many occasions, the
extent of U.S. espionage activities was fully revealed in 2013 by
Edward Snowden.
Snowden, a former CIA employee and contractor
for
the U.S. government, copied and leaked millions of pieces of
highly
classified information from the National Security Agency. The
documents revealed not only the activities of the NSA but also
included the Five Eyes -- U.S., Canada, UK, Australia and New
Zealand -- and shed light on the vast, secret, mass surveillance
programs and its capabilities.
Many of the documents initially released by
Snowden
and reported on in mainstream media contained details on the SSO
unit, a division of the NSA. In particular, under the PRISM
program,
service providers -- including Google, Apple, Microsoft,
Facebook, YouTube, PalTalk, AOL and Yahoo -- allowed the NSA to
collect communications data for analysis. Also part of SSO are
the programs which tap fibre-optic cables around the world -- at
least some of the access to these fibre-optic cables is achieved
through industry cooperation. Other operations are undertaken
without the knowledge of the companies involved.
Another category of
documents reveals NSA operations
that
compromise smartphones and calling patterns. Location data
enables the agency to discern previously unknown relationships
between individuals using its CO-TRAVELER system. Cookies and
data from mobile apps are targeted by a number of NSA tools. Text
messages are also routinely collected.[3]
U.S. claims that Huawei is a threat to national
security are
not only to benefit private interests among the telecom
oligopolies with an unfair advantage in competing with Huawei
technology. Just as important, if not more, it is desperately
trying to protect its cyber espionage network and maintain U.S.
domination of surveillance and spying all over the world.
The U.S., through its Five Eyes partners, which
include
Canada
and its Communications Security Establishment (CSE), have been
working systematically for years to destroy Huawei. A recent
article in the Sydney Morning Herald in Australia, reports
about a meeting in Nova Scotia in July 2018 of spy chiefs from
the Five Eyes. Apparently Prime Minister Trudeau attended
some of the meeting. The title of the article is, "How the 'Five
Eyes' Cooked up the Campaign to Kill Huawei." There were no
reports about this meeting in Canada.
The article points out: "In the months that
followed
that
July 17 dinner, an unprecedented campaign has been waged by those
present -- Australia, the U.S., Canada, New Zealand and the UK --
to block Chinese tech giant Huawei from supplying equipment for
their next-generation wireless networks."[4]
Since the meeting in Nova Scotia, intelligence
officials
have
given a series of public speeches as part of a coordinated effort
to ban Huawei from 5G networks. The article goes on to report
that, "Mike Burgess put Huawei back on the national agenda when
on October 29 he became the first Director-General of the
Australian Signals Directorate to make a public speech in the
organization's 70-year history."
The coordinated activities of the Five Eyes
countries
clearly
shows that the arrest of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou had little to do
with the "rule of law in Canada" but more to do with continued
attacks against Huawei.
Notes
1. "U.S.-China Battle
Over Huawei comes to head at tech show," Kelvin Chan, CTV News,
February 25, 2019.
2. "NSC 68: United States
Objective and Programs for
National
Security," April 14, 1950.
3. "NSA Prism Program Taps
in to
User Data of Apple
Google
and Others," Glenn Greenwald and Ewen Macaskill, Guardian,
June 7, 2013.
4. "How the Five Eyes
cooked up
the campaign to kill
Huawei," Sydney Morning Herald, Chris Uhlmann and Angus
Grigg,
December 17, 2018.
This article was published in
Volume 49 Number 9 - March 16, 2019
Article Link:
Disinformation Over What's at
Stake: Attacks Against Huawei Have Nothing to Do with Rule of Law - Louis Lang
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|