The
Imperialist
Fraud of Balance
- K.C. Adams -
Finding a supposed balance between two diverse
but
related
phenomena is a common imperialist fraud to promote narrow private
interests. One of the most common is to find a balance between
the economy and environmental concerns to divert people from
exposing and thinking about the absence of politics of social
responsibility.
This imperialist practice distracts attention
away from
the
necessity to find solutions to problems in both the economy and
the environment. Those problems have their own particularities
that need to be studied and solved with investments while at the
same time taking into account their relation with other
phenomena.
The practice of
finding a
concocted balance instead of
real
solutions to real problems exposes the unwillingness of the
imperialists to recognize and solve problems as they pose
themselves, objectively, both in the economy and environment. The
imperialists invoke the fraud of balance to avoid analyzing,
discussing and investigating the concrete problems and finding
solutions that require investments of the added-value they want
to expropriate as private profit.
The imperialists say a balance must be struck
between
the
needs of developing the economy and protecting the environment.
This fraud avoids the truth that both the economy and environment
have their own particular aspects and problems that need to be
solved as well as those that are interrelated.
Within this refusal to take up the concrete
analysis of
concrete conditions and find real solutions to real problems is
the motive of production to make as much money as possible in the
shortest time. This motive of the ruling imperialist class blocks
the solving of problems that arise in both the economy and the
environment as a consequence of the development of the modern
productive forces of industrial mass production. The motive of
the rich compels them to take money out of the economy instead of
reinvesting it back into the economy to solve the problems that
inevitably occur as the productive forces become more complex and
vast, such as hydraulic fracturing for oil.
This is particularly evident in the problems that
arise
in
the environment where no immediate profits can arise from solving
problems but on the contrary require added-value be devoted to
finding solutions for environmental degradation and the necessity
for remediation along with broader issues such as climate change.
The motive of the rich is too narrow to tackle problems as they
present themselves. Pragmatic considerations to expropriate
profits in the moment preclude the following of principles and
long-range scientific planning within a motive in conformity with
the modern productive forces and the necessity for social
responsibility.
A glaring example has been the development of
nuclear
energy
and the refusal of the imperialists to find solutions to the
problem of radioactive waste. Another is the abandonment of
mines, oil rigs, drill sites etc. and the need to clean up
industrial sites such as pulp mills that have spilled mercury
into northern lakes and rivers, and places like century-old
Stelco steel-producing land in Hamilton and other facilities that
have either exhausted their productive life or for one reason or
another are considered no longer able to produce maximum profit
for private interests in their present state and are wanted for
another purpose.
Investing in environmental remediation can divert
money
from private profit and that violates the imperialist motive of
production. Companies generally cast off their unwanted property
through bankruptcy protection or demand public funds to repair
damage
before any action is taken. The absence of the politics of social
responsibility is clearly related to the imperialists' motive of
production and their control over it, and their contention that
private
property trumps human rights.
Regarding the review of the Trans Mountain
Pipeline
project, the National Energy Board (NEB) report says, "The Board
has
undertaken this Reconsideration in accordance with the
requirements of
the NEB Act" that
requires
the NEB "to weigh and balance the overall benefits and burdens of
the
Project."
In weighing and
balancing
the benefits and burdens of
the project, "the NEB recommends that the Government of Canada
find
that (the adverse effects or burdens) can be justified in the
circumstances, in light of the considerable benefits of the
Project and measures to minimize the effects."
This is a fraud in the sense that the project
itself
must
find solutions to the problems the development poses and not
dismiss them in such a cavalier manner. The project cannot be
justified if it violates the rights of the people or refuses to
recognize and solve the problems presented within the environment
in the here and now and future. Human rights cannot be minimized,
ignored or marginalized, as they belong to people by virtue of
being human and cannot be violated for any pragmatic or other
spurious reason.
Solutions to the problems of guaranteeing the
rights of
all,
including those of the Indigenous peoples, and solving the
problems of "burdens" on the environment must become part of the
overall value of a project. This overall value would necessarily
increase the price of production and the market price of the
commodity in question, heavy oil. The increased price of
production would go in part towards environmental remediation or
solving the problems that industrial mass production poses. This
would of necessity reduce the rate of profit of the enterprise
with added-value going towards humanizing the social and natural
environment and guaranteeing the rights of all rather than
fattening the pockets of the already bloated global
oligarchs.
This reminds everyone that the modern economy is
comprised of
the struggle for production, scientific experimentation and class
struggle. The leading aspect at this time in history is class
struggle, which essentially means to bring the relations among
people within the economy, along with the social class in control
and its prevailing motive of production, into conformity with the
level and character of the modern socialized productive
forces.
The antagonistic dialectical relation between
employer
and
employee is in contradiction with the socialized productive
forces and must be resolved, not balanced, so that a new
synthesis representing the actual producers comes into being and
asserts its control, along with a new motive of production, to
guarantee the rights, security and well-being of all and to
humanize the social and natural environment.
This article was published in
Volume 49 Number 8 - March 9, 2019
Article Link:
The
Imperialist
Fraud of Balance - K.C. Adams
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|