Matters of Concern to the
Polity
Talk of Protecting
Elections from Foreign
Interference
Seeks
to Lead Canadians
Down a Rabbit Hole
- Anna Di Carlo -
"For the first time
ever,
our security agencies will
provide direct security briefings to key members of national
political campaigns," Minister of Public Safety and Emergency
Preparedness Ralph Goodale told reporters on January 30, when the
Liberal government announced its Election Incident Public
Protocol. On the same day, in an interview aired on CPAC,
Democratic Institutions Minister Karina Gould said, "The other
thing that I want to highlight because I think it's important for
Canadians to know, [...] each political party leader will be
getting secret level security clearance and they will also be
able to designate two or three of their top officials to receive
the security clearance and those conversations are ongoing and
underway."
The website of the Ministry of Democratic
Institutions,
which
is contained within the Privy Council Office, makes it clear that
not "each political party leader" will be getting high security
clearance, as Gould suggests. It says "the Privy Council Office
(PCO), will sponsor security clearances for individuals from the
political parties represented in the House of Commons." It
further explains that the "classified threat briefings to key
leadership in political parties [will] promote situational
awareness and help them to strengthen internal security practices
and behaviours" and "build their awareness of foreign-influenced
activities in Canada." The briefings will be provided by the
Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), the Communications
Security Establishment (CSE) and the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police (RCMP).
The Liberals claim that putting the police and
intelligence
agencies in charge of the electoral process is to protect the
2019 Federal Election from foreign interference. In her interview
on CPAC, Karina Gould was asked: "Are you confident that there
will be efforts to undermine the process [in 2019]?" She
answered, "Look, we are a NATO member, we're a member of the G7,
we're a member of the Five Eyes. It would be naïve of us to
assume that we are not at risk. What we are doing is taking these
risks seriously [...] we're prepared for whatever threats may
arise and we have a plan in place that's across the government
[...] to assure Canadians that we're doing everything that we can
to protect our elections."
All of this talk about
the
dangers posed by foreign
interference takes the discussion about Canada's democracy down a
rabbit hole. It frustrates accountability and undermines the rule
of law by justifying exceptional measures and blocking the polity
from having a say in matters of concern. Most
importantly, it diverts the attention of the polity from the need
for the democratic renewal of the political process so that the
people can control the decisions which affect their lives. Nay
more, the domination of the polity by a political police makes
activities that take up the need to create new arrangements
potentially unlawful, notwithstanding claims that "legitimate"
opinion and "legitimate" dissent will be permitted. It creates a
system in which it is the political police who decide what is and
is not "legitimate," not the people.
This democracy called representative is in dire
need of
renewal -- an act which the people need to carry out to meet the
challenges of our times where it is the producers who need to
position themselves to control the products of their own labour.
As for the ruling circles, they have no argument to justify what
cannot be justified. They repeat the "red scare" of the Cold War
which was designed to mobilize the peoples of the U.S., Europe,
Canada, Australia and former colonies in defence of their
"civilized" democracy against alleged totalitarian regimes. The
people are supposed to forget about their own demands and
aspirations, their own thinking about how to guarantee peace,
democracy and freedom for themselves and the peoples of the
entire world.
The so-called
security
briefings of a select few at the head
of political campaigns further show the extent to which the
political parties which form the cartel party system have been
integrated into the state apparatus. The select few, of course,
consider it a privilege "to serve" and pledge their loyalty to
such a worthy cause. Whatever one wants to call it, it certainly
has nothing to do with democracy!
Canadians demand and the polity requires the
elimination of
the role of privilege in elections in order to provide a
genuinely "equal playing field." For decades Canadians have been
decrying the present political process for its failure to enable
them to control the decision-making process that affects their
lives. Their demand for political renewal to have a better system
of representation has instead been met with a myriad of reforms
that only strengthen the role of privilege within the political
process. The Trudeau Liberals came to power with the promise of
changing the method of voting but after token "consultations"
they declared that Canadians are not interested in changing
anything. They blithely abandoned all claims in this regard.
Instead, the entire system is now overtly turned over to the
political police at the instigation of NATO, its Atlantic Council
and the Five Eyes. It shows that it was not Canadians they were
listening to but the political police!
The hallmark of this Liberal government is thus
going
to be
the crimes it has committed and continues to commit against the
polity at home and the peoples abroad in the name of "protecting
democracy" and "upholding the rule of law."
This article was published in
Volume 49 Number 4 - February 9, 2019
Article Link:
Matters of Concern to the
Polity: Talk of Protecting
Elections from Foreign
Interference
Seeks
to Lead Canadians
Down a Rabbit Hole - Anna Di Carlo
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|