December
10--
International
Human
Rights
Day
Hidden Aims of the Harper Dictatorship's
Canadian
Museum of Human Rights
- Dougal MacDonald -
Involvement in the rendition to torture of Canadian citizens, residents and others;
secret trials and
security certificates;
and unjust imprisonment of its own citizens are
just some of the violations of
rights carried out by the
Harper government.
On November 29, the Harper systemic dictatorship
announced that the Canadian Museum for Human Rights (CHMR) being built
in Winnipeg
will not receive additional money from the federal government next year
to cover projected cost overruns. The Department of Canadian
Heritage says that museum officials will have to make do with the money
already allotted to them. "Our government's commitment to the
museum is unchanged -- $100 million to build the museum and $21.7
million per year to operate it," said James Maunder, spokesman for
Heritage Minister James Moore. "That is our commitment, and there will
be no new funds to the museum."
The Harper dictatorship's Bill C-42, An Act
Amending the Museums Act and making consequential amendments to other
Acts,
received Royal Assent in Canada's Parliament on March 13, 2008, with
support from all political parties, creating the CHMR as a
national museum, the first new national museum in over 40 years and the
first outside of Ottawa. Construction began in 2009 and is
expected to finish in 2012. The CMHR budget is $310 million and funding
so far is $100 million from the Harper dictatorship, $40
million from the province of Manitoba, $20 million from the city of
Winnipeg, and $125 million in private donations.
Of course, the fact that
the Harper dictatorship is promoting a "Museum for Human Rights" is
ludicrous. The Harper dictatorship does
not support human rights in any way, shape, or form. It only supports
the rights of the monopolies under the guise of high-sounding
phrases. The Harperites are violating human rights around the world.
Abroad, the Harperites are engaged in an aggressive war in
Afghanistan and just participated in the massive bombing of Libya.
Plans are afoot for more armed interventions in Syria and Iran. At
home, state security forces were sent to violently attack the G20
demonstrators in Toronto in 2010. The Post Office workers and the Air
Canada workers were barred from striking in 2011 by government
legislation and threats. A law has just been pushed through Parliament
against the will of the farmers in order to destroy the Canadian Wheat
Board. The treatment of Canada's First Nations speaks volumes of
the Harper dictatorship's attitude towards human rights.
The CMHR was first suggested in 2003 by the owner of the
Canwest media monopoly, Izzy Asper, an unquestioning supporter of
serial
human rights violator Israel[1] and a
close friend of many of Canada's
political and business elite. The idea grew out of the Asper
Foundation's Human Rights and Holocaust Studies Program (1997). The
current chair of the CMHR is Arni Thorsteinson, former director of
Onex, a company which supports human rights by participating in the war
industry via its ownership of Raytheon Aircraft and its
partnership with the CIA front and Bush family-linked Carlyle Group.
Part of the CMHR will focus on the Holocaust.[2] It is
likely that the message conveyed will be misleadingly similar to that
of
other such museums in North America. In general, Holocaust museum
commentaries imply that the Holocaust occurred because the Nazis were
just evil people. There is no provision of the historical context of
the Second World War, no mention of the Nazis being supported by
the big German industrialists, and no mention of the collaboration of
the Anglo-American industrialists with the Nazis. There is also
no mention of how, beginning in the 1920s, racist eugenic "scientists"
in the U.S. cultivated deep personal and professional
relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists, many of whom would
become the murderous doctors of the concentration camps.
Hungarian Jews from
Carpatho-Ruthenia, primarily from the Berehov
Ghetto, arrive at the Nazi's Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp
in May-June
1944,
after their betrayal by the Zionist authority in Hungary. (Auschwitz Album)
|
Also omitted from such commentaries are the Zionist
leaders' secret negotiations and deals with the Nazis. One example is
the August
7, 1933 "Transfer Agreement" by which the Third Reich allowed Zionist
leaders to send 60,000 Jews and $100 million to Palestine in
exchange for an end to the world-wide Jewish-led anti-Nazi boycott. A
second example is how in 1937, Nazi Untersturmfuhrer Adolf
Eichmann met in Egypt with Feival Polkes, an agent of the Zionist
terrorist organization, Haganah, regarding collaborating to
facilitate emigration from Europe to Palestine. A third example is the
1944 agreement by Rudolf Kastner of the Jewish-Hungarian Aid
Committee to remain silent about the mass transportation of 850,000
Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz and to pay SS officer Kurt Becher $1.6
million in exchange for Kastner being allowed to take 1,684 Jews out of
Nazi-dominated Hungary on a train to Switzerland.
In December 2010, various reactionaries began objecting
to the content and organization of the CMHR. The Ukrainian Canadian
Congress
is the state-supported organization which in 1940 brought together all
the most reactionary Ukrainian circles by illegally seizing the
assets of the progressive Ukrainian organizations in Canada. The
Ukrainian Canadian Congress and the so-called Ukrainian Canadian Civil
Liberties Association, which exists to whitewash the war crimes of Nazi
collaborators, began complaining about the CMHR's "neglect" of
the "Holodmor." This is the name that they give to the mythical
man-made famine in the Ukraine in the 1930s, a fable concocted by the
Nazis and then widely publicized by the Hearst Press in the U.S. in
order to attack the Soviet Union, communism and Stalin.[3] Recent
CMHR announcements suggest that the reactionaries will be accommodated
and that the "Holodomor" will now be given a place in the
museum.
Harper aims to use the CMHR as a propaganda tool against
the communists and other progressive forces by lying that they are
"human
rights violators" just like the Nazis. The well-worn term
"totalitarianism" will once again be freely used to falsely suggest
that the
Nazis and the communists were the same, even though it was the Soviet
Union who won the admiration of the world's people by leading
them in defeating the Nazis. The CMHR is part of the ongoing campaign
recently launched in Europe and North America aimed at falsifying
history, blocking the forward progress of society, preventing
democratic renewal, and concealing and continuing the crimes of
imperialism against the working class and people.
The real victims who should be commemorated by the CMHR
are the countless millions worldwide who have been slaughtered by those
in
power to protect and advance their anti-people interests. The victims
include all those killed in the anti-fascist war, as well as the
Palestinian people, the people of Korea, Viet Nam, Cambodia,
Laos, Mozambique and the rest of Africa,
Indonesia, Chile, Argentina, Guatemala, Nicaragua, El
Salvador, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya to name only a few. What
is in the
interests of the world's people is not a museum in Canada to
push Harper's fascist agenda and divert from the deeds of his own
dictatorship but a museum to commemorate all those
victims of cold war "democracy."
Notes
1. More than 20 resolutions have been
passed by the
United Nations condemning Israel's violations of human rights.
2. The term holocaust comes from the
Greek word holókauston,
an
animal
sacrifice
offered
to
a
god
in
which the whole (holos)
animal
is
completely
burnt (kaustos).
For hundreds of years, "holocaust" was used
in English to denote great massacres, but since the 1960s, the
term has come to be used by various scholars and popular writers to
refer exclusively to the genocide of Jews.
3. The disinformation about the
famine, which was first
disseminated by the Nazis in 1933 and then picked up by the pro-Nazi
Hearst
press in the United States, was aimed particularly at the
collectivization of agriculture by the Soviet Union as part of its
program to
build socialism. Many of the oligarchs who supported the Nazis had huge
landed estates that they wanted to keep out of the hands of the
people. For example, the family of Nazi Field Marshal von Kleist was
one of the largest landowners in Germany.
Harper Government to Hand Over Detainees
to U.S. Torturers
- Enver Villamizar -
The imperialist mission of the U.S. and its NATO allies
in Afghanistan, including Canada, is a gross violation of human rights.
Now, Canada and the U.S. have worked out a method to incarcerate and
violate the rights of all those who resist their subjugation, further
integrating Canada's military forces with those of the U.S. The Harper
government has put in place an arrangement to normalize gross
violations of human rights by handing over those it captures to the
notorious torturers and abusers of the U.S. military. To its
shame, this is the Harper government's response to its participation in
the violation of Afghan detainees human rights in the notorious
detainee scandal in which the Harper government tried to cover up its
criminal role in the torture and mistreatment of Afghan detainees.On
December 9 the Harper government
announced that it had signed a detainee-transfer arrangement on
November 18 with the Government of the United States to "facilitate the
transfer of detainees captured by the Canadian Forces in Afghanistan to
the custody of U.S. Forces at the
Detention Facility in Parwan, Afghanistan." The announcement clearly
shows that the Canadian military is still engaged in a
counter-insurgency war against the people of Afghanistan, rather than a
training mission, as they constantly repeat. Making the announcement
Minister of Defence Peter MacKay stated: "With
the transition of Canada's combat mission in Kandahar to a new training
mission centred in Kabul, it became apparent that a new arrangement was
needed for the Canadian Forces to continue their important work in
Afghanistan. The facility in Parwan is used by ISAF allies, builds
Afghan institutional capacities
and allows for Canadian monitoring of detainees."
According to the agreement: "Canadian Forces may
transfer into the care, custody, and control of U.S. Forces any
Detainee who:
1. Was detained by Canadian Forces in Afghanistan;
2. Is assessed by the military forces of both
Participants to pose a
continuing threat to stability and counter-terrorism efforts in
Afghanistan or to the safety and security of coalition forces or the
civilian population of Afghanistan, or a threat to export terrorist
violence beyond the borders of Afghanistan; and,
3. Is determined by U.S. Forces to meet established
criteria for
detention in U.S. military detention facilities in Afghanistan."
To cover up that it is a common
U.S. practice to use torture in
various forms against those in their "care and control," under the
heading: "Treatment of Transferred Detainees" the agreement states that
"[a]t all times while a transferred Detainee is in the care, custody,
and control of U.S. Forces, U.S. Forces are
to ensure that the transferred Detainee is treated humanely and in
accordance with U.S. law and policy, and applicable international law,
including Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions."
Then, to make it appear as if Canadians do not have to
worry about
another "detainee scandal," the agreement "permits" the Red Cross and
the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission to visit detainees.
"Representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross and
Red Crescent (ICRC) and the
Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) are to have full
access to transferred Detainees and the facility in which they are
held, for the purposes of monitoring the welfare and conditions of
detention of transferred Detainees." Except of course, the agreement
states, "as required for reasons of imperative
military necessity"-- which essentially means they can have full
access, except when the U.S. doesn't want them to.
Outlining how detainees are to be questioned, the
agreement
establishes that Canadian officials participating in U.S.
interrogations must do so on the basis of U.S. practices. "Canadian
Government officials are to have full access to transferred Detainees
and the facility in which they are held for the purpose of
being present during and/or conducting or participating in any
questioning of transferred Detainees. During such access, Canadian
Government officials are to comply with U.S. Department of Defense
(DoD) policies and procedures should they conduct or participate in
intelligence interrogations, detainee debriefings,
or tactical questioning of any person who is in the custody or under
the effective control of the U.S. Department of Defense."
Concerning the mistreatment of detainees which will no
doubt take
place, the agreement puts responsibility for investigation in the hands
of the abuser. "The Participant whose military forces exercised care,
custody, and control over the transferred Detainee at the time the
mistreatment is alleged to have occurred
is to investigate the allegations and, when appropriate, prosecute
those responsible."
The agreement then outlines how to
deal with Canadian citizens who
are captured and transferred to the U.S. "[I]f a transferred Detainee
is subsequently discovered to be a Canadian national, U.S. Forces, upon
Canadian Forces' request, are to return such transferred Detainee to
Canadian Forces' care, custody,
and control."
The agreement also implies that the U.S. may take its
own "legal"
actions against detainees, outside of the Afghan legal system. "U.S.
Forces are to consult with Canadian Government officials prior to the
initiation of any U.S. legal proceedings involving a transferred
Detainee and notify Canadian Government
officials whether any Canadian-sourced information will be used in the
proceedings, as well as of the outcome of any U.S. legal proceedings
involving a transferred Detainee."
Under duration, there is no end date for the
arrangement. In
addition it clearly spells out that the agreement is not even legally
binding under international law. "This arrangement is not intended to
have legally binding effect under international law."
December 10, 2011 Bulletin • Return to Index • Write to:
editor@cpcml.ca
|