Significance of Sentence Given to Derek Chauvin for Murder of George Floyd


Protest in Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 19, the day before the verdict was reached in Derek Chauvin's trial.

Following the court's sentencing of Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd to only 22.5 years -- which means he is eligible for parole in 15 years -- many community members were angry, saying such a sentence did not fulfill their demands for justice and accountability. Many had demanded charges of first degree murder for which, in Minnesota, conviction means life in prison. Chauvin's charge of second degree murder has a maximum of 40 years but even that was not given. He was also found guilty of second-degree manslaughter and third-degree murder. The judge has discretion to provide sentencing for each, to be served consecutively. For Minnesota, the maximum for second degree manslaughter is 10 years and for third degree murder nine years, or 59 years in total.

Many compare Chauvin's sentence of 22.5 years for murdering George Floyd to longer sentences commonly served for similar or lesser offences, especially when African Americans and Puerto Ricans are being sentenced. One in seven people in U.S. prisons are serving a life sentence, commonly for lesser violent crimes than murder. This includes 3,972 people serving life sentences for a drug-related offence. More than two-thirds of those serving life sentences are people of colour with one in five Black men in prison serving a life sentence, again usually for lesser crimes than Chauvin's.

Puerto Rican political prisoners got 60-75 year sentences just for conspiracy, with no actual act of violence having been committed. Leonard Peltier, an Indigenous leader charged with murder, which even the government now admits he did not commit, remains in prison after 46 years. He is now 77, yet the government refuses to release him.

The sentence given Derek Chauvin will not act as a deterrent to more racist killings by police either. So long as the U.S. state and its policing agencies at all levels refuse to assume ownership of their own actions, such killings will continue until the people themselves succeed in bringing them to an end. The rulers take no responsibility because they believe they will not face any consequences. That is where they are wrong.


This article was published in

Volume 51 Number 18 - July 4, 2021

Article Link:
https://cpcml.ca/Tmlm2021/Articles/MS51182.HTM


    

Website:  www.cpcml.ca   Email:  editor@cpcml.ca