A modern
constitution for
Canada must end the
colonial injustice suffocating the Indigenous peoples and implement the
principles of nation-to-nation relations. It
must recognize Quebec's right to self-determination, provide guarantees
for citizens and residents of the rights they possess by virtue of
being human, and set the stage for the democratic
renewal of the political process so that the peoples of Canada can
directly decide the matters that concern them and affect their lives
and the lives of peoples in other parts of the world
affected by Canada's foreign policy.
History calls on
the
peoples of Canada and Quebec and the Indigenous peoples to establish
modern arrangements amongst themselves based on a free and equal union
of sovereign
entities. On this basis they can face the challenges of the 21st
century with the people recognized as sovereign and in control over
decision-making, the institutions of the state and the
direction of the country.
Where Sovereignty Is
Vested
The Constitution of Canada based on the 19th century
arrangement of the British North America Act (BNA
Act) still considers the Queen of England the sovereign of Canada
and its head of state. The document A Consolidation of the
Constitution Acts 1867 to 1982 provided by the Department of
Justice stipulates, "The Executive Government and
Authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be
vested in the Queen." When the BNA Act,
an act of the British Parliament was patriated to Canada in 1982,
then-Prime Minister of Canada Pierre Trudeau, along with the provincial
Premiers, did not see fit to remove this anachronism from the
fundamental law of the land. Again, during the talks
that led to the Meech Lake Accord of 1987 and in the report on the
consensus between the Prime Minister and 10 Premiers that led to the
Charlottetown Accord of 1992, no
recommendation was made to repeal this clause.
A
change from sovereignty residing in the monarch to sovereignty
residing in the people is not a minor one but a radical departure from
the rule of the few in their narrow interests
over the many, to the rule of the many in the broad public interest. It
is not possible to have a modern constitution consistent with the
aspirations and demands of the people at this time in
history without a clear affirmation and definition that the people are
sovereign. The sovereign power sanctions everything fundamental in
terms of the law of the land and everything that
emanates from it.
This anachronism has not been
removed because the sovereign power of
the state has been transferred to the Prime Minister and Premiers as
Queen in Parliament, the Legislatures and
National Assembly of Quebec. Keeping the Queen of England as the formal
titular head of state allows the ruling elite to hide this fact. The
authority of the Prime Minister and Premiers is
absolute in the English tradition of concentrating power in the
Crown-in-Parliament.
When the Prime Minister or
Premiers say they have a mandate to rule
for an allotted time frame, legally the Canadian Constitution allows
them to do so in an absolutist manner within
the separation of the federal and provincial powers. Were the
Constitution to declare that sovereignty resides with the Canadian
people, then it would have to stipulate the rights and duties
the people grant their governments, and how the governments are to be
chosen by and accountable to the people. A change in this regard would
necessarily mean recognizing and
establishing in law that the people are sovereign and creating the
legal means to enable them to be so. This formidable epoch-changing
modernization of the Constitution is not something
the present ruling elite and their cartel political parties are either
willing to accomplish or capable of doing.
A
democracy that does not provide the citizens of the country with
the means to exercise control over the policies and decisions of the
elected bodies according to the fundamental law
they themselves have enacted, is a form of authoritarian and absolutist
rule.
The constitutional arrangements of the last
more than 150 years have
never vested sovereignty in the people. On the contrary, Confederation
in 1867 was a power-sharing arrangement
between Britain and the local ruling elite and concerned itself mainly
with the division of powers between the central government and the
provinces. The promise to submit the agreement
that united four provinces into a dominion for the people's approval
was quickly abandoned when it became clear that it would have been
rejected. Neither the 1982 patriation of the
Constitution and addition of a Charter of Rights and Freedoms nor any
of the changes made since have overcome the fact that the Constitution
of Canada does not emanate from the people
and that Confederation did not permit a free and equal union of
sovereign peoples.
Quebec Is Said to Be One of Two
"Founding Nations" of Canada But Is Not a Signatory to the Constitution
Act of 1982
Quebec is not a signatory to the Constitution Act of
1982 as
a result of the obstinate refusal of the ruling elite to recognize its
right to self-determination. Attempts to sort out
Quebec's place in Confederation have failed time and again because all
have sought to maintain the anachronistic Anglo-Canadian state
arrangements which refuse to recognize Quebec's
sovereignty.
One of the main obstacles to
the
resolution of the place of Quebec
in or out of Confederation, and a practical means used to deprive the
people of Quebec of their rights over this entire
period, is the following: from the outset, the aspiration of the
people to take control of decision-making has been eclipsed by the
imposition of divisions based on considerations of origin,
language or religion. It began with the Durham Report of 1839, which
declared that the problem in Canada was the emergence of a "mortal
hatred" between "two races, the French and the
English."
Durham's assertion was a deliberately
false representation of what
had taken place during the Rebellion of 1837-1838 against British rule
in Lower Canada. It was an application of the
famous British empire-building strategy of divide and rule. The same
was done a few years later in India. The British empire-builders
proclaimed that the problem in India was that the
Muslims and Hindus hated each other. In actual fact Indians of all
origins and religions united against British rule in the War of
Independence of 1857. The big lie of hatred amongst the
people permitted the British colonialists to present themselves as the
peacemakers and spread the empire-builders' doctrine of tolerance.
Justin Trudeau invokes tolerance in a similar manner
today. This kind of thing stigmatizes anyone who contests the present
constitutional arrangements as intolerant and backward.
To
ensure that the Canadian colonies were seized by resentments
based on ethnic and language differences, the Durham Report openly
recommended the assimilation of French
Canadians, whom it called "a people with no literature and no history."
From this self-serving and anti-people perspective, the British
empire-builders imposed a legislative union of Upper
and Lower Canada and a factional system of party government. This set
the stage for institutionalized politics of fomenting antagonisms
amongst the people and dividing them along party
lines, based on their alleged values.
The
Liberal Party of today is born out of a division of the Parti Rouge
created by the Patriots to pursue their cause as expressed during the
Rebellions of 1837-38. Some in the
Parti Rouge were enticed into the politics of division while those who
opposed the division and persisted in upholding the republican ideas of
the Patriots were persecuted, isolated,
imprisoned, hung, left stranded, ostracized and ex-communicated by the
Church, their writings forbidden to be distributed and read. The
champions of the politics of division went on to
create the Liberal Party of Canada following Confederation.
The
fight for a republic in Lower Canada against the undemocratic
rule of the colonial power and its local ruling elite -- the Château Clique -- comprised of rich and powerful
merchants, had united all democratic-minded people, whatever their
origin. Their struggle was accompanied by a similar uprising in Upper
Canada, led by William Lyon Mackenzie and
directed against the privileges and stranglehold of the ruling clique
there, called the Family Compact.
The politics of
division has been used ever since to weigh down the
people of Quebec and act as an instrument of oppression of the Quebec
nation, with adherents both inside and
outside Quebec and even inside and outside the nationalist movement.
The motion adopted in 2006 by the government of Stephen Harper
"recognizing the nation of Quebec" asserts: "This
House recognizes that the Québécois form a nation
within
a united Canada." The motion confines the nation of Quebec to an ethnic
group whose language is French. The motion does not
include people who speak other languages and who are of other origins
as part of the nation of Quebec. Nor does it uphold nation-to-nation
relations with the Indigenous peoples whose
unceded territories have been inhabited. The motion introduces a
diffuse notion of Québécois without a defined
territory,
one comprising separated communities across Canada of French
Canadian descent. In this convoluted framework, the "nation of Quebec"
can never be conceived as sovereign and having the right to
self-determination up to and including the right to
secede from Canada. As in any marriage, only a free and equal union can
hope to flourish.
To confine the notion of Quebec
to an ethnic group of
Québécois was also the strategy used by Pierre
Elliott
Trudeau to deny the existence of the nation of Quebec and the people of
Quebec their national rights. In the 1960s, Pierre Trudeau proclaimed
nationalism to be "backward" and an enemy of the modern state, on which
he imposed his own self-serving irrational
definition of a nation. He claimed the nation of Quebec did not exist
but was simply a large ethnic group within Canada. "Biculturalism" was
introduced as the official policy of the
Canadian state as a means to circumvent and undermine the demands and
aspirations of the nation of Quebec and Indigenous nations and to
weaken the unity of all the peoples of Canada
and Quebec and of Indigenous descent and their demand for new
arrangements capable of resisting the empire-building of U.S.
imperialism.
After the October 2015 federal
election, Justin Trudeau applied a
similar conceit to Canada saying, "There is no core identity, no
mainstream in Canada. There are shared values --
openness, respect, compassion, willingness to work hard, to be there
for each other, to search for equality and justice."
As
concerns Quebec, Justin Trudeau has said on several occasions
that "nationalism is an old idea from the 19th century" and is based on
"a smallness of thought." He further claims
that Canada is "the first postnational state." This desire of Trudeau
the younger that Canada be a "postnational state" can be set within the
perspective of Trudeau the elder's assertions of
"backward nationalism" in the 1960s and 1970s and his prejudice
equating nationalism with small-mindedness. The attack of Trudeau father and
son on what they call narrow-minded
nationalism boils down to an attack on the right of the people to build
their decision-making power at their level against the concentration of
power in the hands of the privileged few which
is today exercised on a supranational level within the neo-liberal
global economy. The fight to affirm this right extends from the
rebellion against colonial control and the iron grip of the
rich merchants of the Château Clique in the 19th century to the
striving to end the power of the supranational powerful economic global
monopolies and oligopolies of today and their
military arms, such as NATO.
The people face an
obstinate refusal to recognize Quebec's right to
self-determination and the people's right to be and to govern
themselves with modern institutions, and the sowing of
divisions of all kinds. The ruling elite are incapable of providing
Canada with a modern perspective of a free and equal union of the
peoples of Canada, Quebec, Indigenous peoples and
Métis. In the Canadian federalism based on liberal notions
of
empire-building, people are subjects and the sovereign power resides in
the monarch, which today is a front for the
concentration of power in the hands of the Prime Minister's Office
acting on behalf of the most powerful monopolies centred in the
U.S.-led imperialist system of states.
The
Necessity to End Colonial Injustice and Negation of Rights and
to Establish Nation-to-Nation Relations with the Indigenous Peoples
The
Canadian
Constitution does not recognize the inherent
hereditary
rights and treaty rights of the Indigenous peoples and the sovereignty
of their nations. The hereditary rights of the
Indigenous peoples are their rights to be and live on their traditional
territories according to what their own thought material teaches them,
how they define their needs and what they require
in the 21st century to concretize their rights and give them full
expression. The colonial invasion attempted to negate the hereditary
and other rights and development of the peoples who, since time
immemorial, have inhabited Turtle Island and the territories of
what were called the Americas.[1]
This negation of rights must be negated if
justice is to prevail and nation-to-nation relations are to be
established in practice, allowing the Indigenous peoples to flourish.
The Constitution does not recognize the fiduciary obligations
of
Canada as a country that was built through the colonial seizure,
occupation and exploitation of Indigenous lands and
labour and the genocidal attempt to wipe them out as peoples. The
fiduciary obligations must ensure that the highest standard of living
is guaranteed to the Indigenous peoples and that all
services are provided at the highest level modern society has attained.
Renewing on a modern basis the relationships amongst sovereign
Indigenous nations, the Métis nation, sovereign Quebec and
sovereign Canada -- the sovereign peoples as individuals and
collectives -- is
critical to the renewal of Confederation and the modernization of the
conditions of life itself.
The policies of
the
Liberal government and the denial of the
Conservatives in the Opposition, both of whom are contending to form
the next government, are as unprincipled as they are
pragmatic. Justin Trudeau's senior Assistant Deputy Minister for
Treaties and Aboriginal Government, Crown-Indigenous Relations, Joe
Wild, in discussing ways to "breathe new
life" into the Canadian Constitution regarding Canada's relations with
First Nations and their sovereignty, said, "There is a notion of
sovereignty that can still exist in a way that doesn't
threaten the fabric of the nation. There may be a few areas where
you've got to be a little bit careful, like raising an army, the border
of the country versus other countries, but the rest of
it? You could probably figure out ways in which it kind of works out
and it doesn't actually do anything that would threaten the standing of
Canada as Canada."[2]
Wild also said his government will deal with each Indigenous community
or nation as a separate entity to try to reach an agreement with each
one of them.
Wild's comments indicate the
continuation of an oppressive colonial
relation which today the Trudeau government reiterates when it says it
will carry on making decisions that affect
the lives of Indigenous peoples without their consent. The fight of
Indigenous peoples for sovereignty on their lands and in all
decision-making does not have to answer to a greater power
that decides for them and claims that it represents the fabric of the
nation. Sovereignty means that the Indigenous peoples decide and their
relations with Canada are relations between
sovereign entities with the modern relationship enshrined in the
Constitution. The renewal of the Constitution must eliminate any
vestige of colonial relations and the catch-phrases such as
"collaborative approach" etc, which mean in practice the continuation
of the status quo.
The demand for a
modern
constitution is yet another struggle
bringing Indigenous, Canadian and Quebec peoples into closer united
action for their rights. The struggle of all the peoples
is at heart one fight -- the fight for political and constitutional
renewal so that the rights of all can be guaranteed in a modern
constitution that recognizes, upholds and guarantees the rights
of all. The 19th century colonial racist Canadian state and its
retrogressive Constitution are blocking the forward movement of society
for which all the peoples as individuals and collectives
aspire.
The time is now for women and youth,
together with all the working
people and their allies in other strata and classes across Canada and
Quebec to work together with the Indigenous
peoples for a profound renewal of the political arrangements in the
society and to deprive the authorities of their power to deprive the
people of their rights. The peoples themselves must be
empowered to take control of their economic, political and social
affairs. Constitutional and political renewal is a precondition for
true reconciliation amongst the Indigenous peoples,
Canada and Quebec.
Notes
1.
Abya Yala
is the term with which the Cuna Indians (Panama) refer
to the entire American continent. It means "land in full maturity" and
was suggested by the Aymara leader Takir
Mamani, who proposed that all Indigenous peoples use it in their
documents and oral statements because to call the land with
the strange name of New World is not acceptable.
2.
June 4, 2017.
This article was published in
Volume 51 Number 17 - July 1, 2021
Article Link:
https://cpcml.ca/Tmlm2021/Articles/MS51173.HTM
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca