Discussion on Matters of Concern to the Polity
New Laws and Regulations Purporting to Oppose Hate Propaganda and Violence by "Extremist Entities"
- Pauline Easton - On February 21, the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist)
hosted a
zoom meeting to discuss new laws and regulations which purport to
oppose hate propaganda
and the promotion of violence by "extremist entities." In the
opinion of CPC(M-L), this is an important discussion. At issue is
not whether the state is behind terrorist violence or racism or
anti-communism or whether its definition of extremism is per se
self-serving. They are. States such as that of Canada, created according to Hobbesian Covenant
Thesis, are ruled by police powers -- that is to say by arbitrary
discretionary powers in the hands of the executive
and judiciary as well as intelligence agencies, police and armed and
special forces. Not only that, these entities swear an oath of
allegiance to the person of state, a fiction created for the
purpose of providing a raison d'état, a reason for the
state. This fictional person of state wields a sword in one hand,
representing power over all matters to do with war and peace,
and a bishop's staff in the other, representing all matters to do with
accepted values, crime and punishment. Since the creation of this model
of nation-state after the English Civil War in
the 1660s, these values have been those of the ruling class whose
propertied interests and rule it defends.
Under this model, legislatures were created that were said to
represent the sovereignty of the people, even though all representatives
swear allegiance not to the people but to the sovereign. In Canada, the
"sovereign" is the Queen of England declared to also be the Queen of
Canada. Even though this is said to be a ceremonial position only, the
sovereign wields powers that are not at all ceremonial, Prerogative Powers, directly and through the ministries, judiciary,
top civil servants and all those whose main mission is to
perpetuate the sovereign's rule. This is where the political police also
play a key covert function to eliminate any threat to this rule using
any means fair or foul. No matter what reforms take place, they are
fundamentally imbued with anti-worker, anti-people and racist ideology
as a matter of course and, since the onset of the Cold War in the 20th century, with anti-communism as well.
Recognizing the role of the state, constituted to establish the kind
of rule which presently exists, is all the more important at a time the fight of
the people for the affirmation of their rights takes
centre stage. Canada forms part of the imperialist system of states
with the U.S., Britain, France and its integral parts such as Canada
are the main teachers by negative example. They are
mired in crises and the times demand equality and that the rights of
all be provided with a guarantee.
The times also demand that problems within a country and between
countries be settled peacefully, and honourably, in a manner which
benefits the peoples of the world. Far from being
guided by the interests of the peoples, the countries which are based
on serving imperialist interests are using all the tools in their
arsenal to establish their own hegemony over rival powers. To even
question who they serve is taboo. All of this inflames passions and even
rage which is precisely why such taboos must be questioned and such
matters of concern must not be kept outside the purview of thought and
speech.
All of it is to make sure that today the struggle of the New against
the Old is derailed into attacks on individuals, and the
criminalization of opinion, speech, thought and conscience as
well as organization. The claim of the rulers is not to be contested:
they get to decide both the crime and the punishment. In the name of
national security and the national interest, the
criteria used to determine who is "legitimate" and who is "illegitimate,"
what thought is "legitimate" and what thought is "illegitimate," are
secret, arbitrary and self-serving. To even question
who they serve is taboo. It is precisely such taboos which must be
questioned and not allowed to be kept outside the purview of thought
and speech. If what are called Reasonable Limits on
rights are not seen to be reasonable, the polity is in trouble. Unity
can only be built on the basis of an informed public opinion, not by
disinforming public opinion so as to make sure no
opposition can contest the anti-national and anti-people rule which is
being established at an increasingly rapid rate.
All of this is taking place at a time the consequences of the
neo-liberal anti-social agenda have shown themselves to be disastrous
in the form of increased poverty, hunger, disease,
drought and harm to the natural and social environment. When we see
within the U.S. Senate itself accusations and counter-accusations of
sedition, treason and who is and who is not a
patriot, the effect is to provide a justification for the police powers
to take charge, as took place when the Pentagon took charge of the
Capitol for the inauguration of Joe Biden in Washington, DC in January. This was as much
a threat to Biden to toe the line as to anyone else.
And now we see the response of the federal police on the occasion of
the trial of the killer of George Floyd due to take place on March 8.
Minneapolis has been turned into an armed fortress even greater than the
one established for Biden's inauguration. This is the response to the people's movement in the U.S. for
equality and to end police impunity and to defund the police. It is
supposed to send a clear message to those demanding police
accountability and an end to the use of violence against the people, to
the workers fighting for their rights, and the people fighting for
proper medical attention, jobs, food and housing to support Biden, "or
else." And, of course, opposition to the impunity is made the target of
attack under the guise that it poses a threat to national security and
the national interest. All of it is presented in terms of the need to
protect the constitutional order which is why the people insist on
holding political discussion on how matters can be dealt with in a
manner which realizes their aims, not those of the rulers.
There is no doubt that in the U.S., as in all countries of the
world where the regime is not constituted by the people, the working
class and people of all origins together with the
Indigenous nations will learn how to deal with the new situations they
are facing as they persist in their fight for equality and a form of
rule which ensures that justice for the people
prevails.
The response can only be to fight in a manner that permits the
emergence of a modern political personality that takes the form of
political arrangements which involve the people in
taking the decisions which affect their lives. The real issue is to
recognize equality conferred by membership and affirm the right to
speech, conscience and organization so as to work out
together what that means today, in the form of interventions which
uphold the interests of the people.
CPC(M-L) is participating in this discussion so as to engage
everyone in working out what it means to be political within the
situation by analyzing how this issue called domestic
terrorism poses itself, along with ideological extremism and who
decides. We will follow up with discussion on the significance of the
impeachment charges against Trump. The likelihood
of losing was ever-present so what was that all about? Our approach is
based on the fundamental question that this topic poses, which is how
to engage in and affirm the human right to
speak and the right to organize under the current circumstances in a
manner which defends the rights of the people and their claims on
society, claims they are entitled to make by virtue of
being human.
We want to start by reiterating clearly that CPC(M-L) is today and
has always been opposed to terrorist attacks in all their forms,
whether individual or collective. The Party has
successfully opposed all attempts in the past to eliminate CPC(M-L) by
claiming it was violent or advocates violence or that it is not a
legitimate political force. The imprisonment of its
activists and defamation of its leaders so as to isolate the Party and
defeat it all failed to achieve their goal because CPC(M-L) is a
political entity which responds to the needs of the times.
Under all conditions and circumstances the members of CPC(M-L) organize
to give the striving of the people for empowerment courage and
conviction. The aim of defeating CPC(M-L)
was and has always been to make sure the people do not become political
themselves.
Today too we will continue to champion the defence of the rights of
the workers, women, youth, national minorities, Indigenous peoples and
Quebec, and of the fighting peoples of the
world and the right to be of sovereign nation-states. Attacks against
them based on declaring them illegitimate, sponsors of state terrorism,
genocide, and not fit to live if they refuse to be
enslaved and do the bidding of the ruling elites, will not pass. To try
to rescue what are called the liberal democratic institutions by
falling back on methods that have been shown always to
have recourse to crimes of various sorts conducted by political police
and Prerogative Powers is not what people expect of a modern democracy.
The people reject the creation by rulers at
all levels of spectres of dangers to haunt them. They face enough real
dangers. Long ago, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels proclaimed to the
world -- let us put the bourgeoisie's spectre of
communism used to haunt Europe to rest with a Manifesto of Our Own --
Workers of All Countries Unite!
The political movement of the people for the New is the very
antithesis of what constitutes a conspiracy or conspiracy theories. A
political program is not a conspiracy! It does not
submit to the self-serving limitations the ruling class sees fit to
impose on rights to speech, conscience and action in the name of
national security and interest. To speak is a human right,
necessary to humanize the natural and social environment. CPC(M-L)
calls on everyone to speak out on this matter of serious concern to the
polity.
This article was published in
Volume 51 Number 6 - February 28, 2021
Article Link:
https://cpcml.ca/Tmlm2021/Articles/MS51061.HTM
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|