Canada Joins U.S. Claims of Cyber Attacks and Preparations for War
- Pauline Easton -
On July 19, Canada joined the Biden
administration in a "coalition" to publicly
accuse the Chinese government of malicious cyber
activities and irresponsible state behaviour, in
language just short of declaring cyber warfare.
The joint announcement claims the U.S. uncovered
a wide array of cyber attacks against Microsoft
by hackers they said had a history of working
for China's Ministry of State Security (MSS).
The announcement
said China is responsible for the attack on
Microsoft's email software -- an attack which
infected tens of thousands of businesses,
government offices and schools in the U.S.
alone. Those joining the U.S. coalition
included, besides Canada, the European Union
(EU), Australia, Britain, Japan, New Zealand,
and the other countries comprising the U.S.-led
NATO military alliance.
In connection with the allegations, the U.S.
Department of Justice announced criminal charges
against those they claimed were the four
hackers, for targeting foreign governments and
entities in crucial sectors such as defence,
education, health care, the maritime and
aviation sectors, and for cyber theft of
intellectual property for financial gain.
The charges are part of the focus on cyber
security by the governments which form part of
the U.S. imperialist coalition and attempts by
the Biden administration to define what
constitutes cyber warfare. Raising the issue of
crucial sectors of the economy and life, such as
aviation and electrical grids, is to establish
them as part of national security and to justify
charges of cyber warfare.
For its part, Canada is making cyber security a
prominent issue in the conduct of the upcoming
federal election. It is marching in lockstep
with the Biden administration which is also
working to establish rules for what constitute
crimes and punishment, while also publicly
putting in place the means to back up U.S.
claims that a cyber attack was committed by
China, Russia, or another country it is accusing
of such things. As part of this, the U.S.
National Security Agency (NSA), the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the new
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
(CISA) which was formed in 2018 with a budget of
more than $3 billion, published a "Joint
Cybersecurity Advisory." The Advisory has what
the U.S. says are more than 50 "tactics,
techniques and procedures" used by hackers
associated with China.
This year CISA has already received a funding
increase of $650 million, added to what is
expected to be $2.3 billion. CISA also has the
authority to "hunt proactively" for threats
across civilian federal networks and subpoena
authority over internet service providers when
the agency "detects critical vulnerabilities in
national infrastructure." It will encourage the
private sector to turn over more information
about the cyber threats they face. CISA also
serves as a top federal liaison on cyber issues
for private-sector owners of what is designated
by the government as critical national
infrastructure.
A salient problem is that cyber warfare and
cyber security are not defined by the
government, any more than what constitutes
terrorism has ever been defined. It is also
known that terrorism charges inside the country
have mainly targeted those standing against wars
of aggression, or those who are defending the
environment and opposing racist police killings
or incarcerations at the southern U.S. border.
Many expect that U.S. government claims of cyber
attacks will follow the same course and that
Canada will follow suit, falling in line with
the U.S.
A major concern is the method used by President
Biden and the U.S. administration to launch
accusations and declare crimes and punishment
without providing facts or evidence. This method
is also used by the government of Canada.
Everything is about "appearance," what the
rulers say the attacks "look like," what China
"might do" and the like. The hackers are said to
have a "history of working for China," but that
history is not provided. Nor is it said whether
there is evidence that they are still working
for China. All of this is said to be secret and
therefore cannot be divulged.
As the "Joint Security Advisory" shows, the
method also involves providing a list of what
the U.S. asserts are "tactics, techniques and
procedures" that are like, or have the
appearance of being, those used by Russia or
China. This then is used to say the attacks are
made by Russia or China. There is no direct
evidence. The basis for identifying the
particular "tactics" as belonging to China also
remains secret. The assertions and publication
of the list serve to create a norm that whenever
these same "tactics, techniques and procedures"
appear, they can be attributed to Russia or
China.
A problem the U.S. government and those
appeasing the U.S. government face is that it is
next to impossible to attribute specific cyber
attacks to particular governments or
individuals, especially on an international
level. This is because the attacks can be made
to look like they are being made by those
countries, or coming from particular places,
using the very "tactics" cited, when that is not
the case. Attribution cannot be made -- a fact
already established in various cases which have
refuted U.S. claims and shown them to be
fraudulent.
The U.S. is simply asserting that attacks can
be attributed to China or Russia. For purposes
of mobilizing their military bureaucracy and for
purposes of creating public opinion, the U.S.
asserts that China or Russia are conducting
these attacks and that they should be punished.
Whatever claims are made by the U.S. about the
"tactics, techniques and procedures" used by
China or Russia or Iran or others are to be
considered valid. In this way the media,
pundits, politicians and academics are drawn
into a debate about whether Russia or China were
involved, while the list of tactics given and
the methods used are established as "the norm."
The whole process is also a means to generate
fear and antagonisms towards China and Russia so
as to prepare for war. The Pentagon regularly
states that China and Russia are "strategic
adversaries," who could target "national
strategic infrastructure." Canada also promotes
these threats of cyber warfare, as decided by
the U.S., to lay the groundwork for justifying
war.
Cyber Security Scare Shows that Military
Might Fails
to Gain Political Advantage
A problem the U.S. rulers are repeatedly
contending with is that even with their military
and nuclear superiority, they cannot achieve
political advantage. The U.S. spends more on its
military than the next eight countries, which
include Russia and China, combined. China has,
for example, four aircraft carriers. The U.S.
has many more and many more nuclear weapons as
well as the means to deliver them. Similarly,
the "peace dividend" and political advantage
that was supposed to emerge with the fall of the
Soviet Union did not occur. Today, the U.S.,
like the liberal democracies in Europe, have
dysfunctional governing institutions, civil war
conditions among the vying factions of the
rulers and widespread dissatisfaction and lack
of legitimacy among the people. In Canada, the
liberal democratic institutions are also
dysfunctional. The integration of the Canadian
economy into the U.S. war machine and of the
Canadian state with the U.S. imperialist agenda
for world domination means that the U.S. civil
war scenario spills into the country's political
arena. As part of contending with this, the
claim is made that the problem with elections,
for example, is foreign interference by Russia
or China, or Iran, rather than the failure and
racist, unrepresentative nature of the existing
constitutional order which they demand everyone
uphold.
Further, much
like the U.S. did with nuclear weapons, they are
trying to impose their rules as to what is and
is not cyber warfare and what the punishments
are and who has authority to impose them. For
nuclear weapons the U.S. put in place the notion
of secrecy, that information about building
nuclear weapons was a state secret and anyone
releasing such information was guilty of
espionage. They then enforced this with, for
example, criminal charges and execution of the
Rosenbergs, using this claim of espionage.
Similar efforts are being made concerning cyber
warfare and cyber security so as to establish
U.S. authority to act, impose punishments and
justify imperialist war. People siding with
Russia or China can be branded agents of a
foreign power, or guilty of treason. While the
U.S. openly talks of interfering in Cuba's
internet, they are also again promoting
anti-communism to provide justification for
targeting the many forces supporting Cuba.
Further, with Biden's continuing threats, the
memory of a potential nuclear confrontation
between Russia and the U.S., as occurred with
the 1960's missile crisis, has been brought to
the fore. So too supporting the people of
Palestine, or demanding the peaceful resolution
of conflicts or opposing the provocations the
U.S. and NATO are engaging in in the
Indo-Pacific region are treated as stands that
are foreign inspired or in the service of
"adversarial states."
Biden's NSA Speech on Cyber Threats and
Cyberwar
On July 28 Biden delivered a speech at a
gathering of members of the 18 intelligence
agencies in the U.S. in McLean, Virginia at the
"National Counterterrorism Centre at Liberty
Crossing Intelligence Campus." Biden declared
that a cyber attack will most likely cause a
major war and identified China and Russia as the
likely perpetrators. Speaking of the upcoming
U.S. mid-term elections, Biden accused Russia of
interference. He decried "rampant disinformation
that is making it harder and harder for people
to access -- assess the facts, be able to make
decisions." Pulling his "the U.S. is innocent of
any wrong-doing, we are the paradigm of
democracy and human rights" card, he protested:
"[...] look what Russia is doing already about
the 2022 elections and misinformation. It's a
pure violation of our sovereignty."
Biden told the audience: "You know, we've seen
how cyber threats, including ransomware attacks,
increasingly are able to cause damage and
disruption to the real world. I can't guarantee
this and you're as informed as I am, but I think
it's more likely we're going to end up -- well,
if we end up in a war, a real shooting war with
a major power, it's going to be as a consequence
of a cyber breach of great consequence. And it's
increasing exponentially -- the capabilities."
He described the U.S. intelligence agencies as
"the eyes and ears around the world," stating
they are "in the frontlines of our national
defence, and in many cases, for the world,
through us."
Speaking about Russia, Biden spoke like a
hoodlum. His overall approach is to become
personal to give the impression that he has the
inside track "When I was with Mr. Putin,
who has a real problem -- he is -- he's sitting
on top of an economy that has nuclear weapons
and oil wells and nothing else. Nothing else.
Their economy is -- what? -- the eighth smallest
in the world now -- largest in the world?
He knows -- he knows he's in real trouble, which
makes him even more dangerous, in my view."
So too when he spoke about China. "Take a look
at China. I've spent more time with Xi Jinping
as a world leader than anyone else has. [...] He
is deadly earnest about becoming the most
powerful military force in the world, as well as
the largest -- the most prominent economy in the
world by the mid-40s -- the 2040s. It's real."
Biden seems to think that accusing Russia and
China of what the U.S. itself is all about
provides proof that Russia and China, and not
the U.S., pose the greatest danger to world
peace at this time.
Later in his speech, Biden suggested that there
was a need to also work with Russia and China to
deal with "existential problems" facing the
entire world. This in fact serves to further
reveal how the world is being put on a
war-footing. Biden said, "at the same time, we
have to work in cooperation with nations like
China and Russia that are our competitors -- and
possibly mortal competitors down the road -- in
the context of there's -- to meet the
existential threats, for example, of climate
change. There are certain things that are in our
mutual interest. But we can't -- we can't
be lulled into thinking that that's enough and
that we don't really have to keep a watchful eye
on what the ultimate objective of the other team
is. But there are things where we should be --
where we should be cooperating."
Biden made it more than clear that such
cooperation must never lose sight of the U.S.
pursuit of domination and control. "A
dramatically warming Arctic is opening up
competition for resources that once were hard to
access. I had -- as they say in Southern
Delaware -- they talk at you like this, you know
what I mean? -- I had a "Come to Jesus" meeting,
an "altar call" with Mr. Putin about what he
thinks is what Russia's property is in the
Arctic. China looking very closely at that as
well, where they are. That's what I mean about
the world changing. What is that going to do to
our strategic doctrine in the next 2, 5, 10, 12
years, when you can circumvent the Arctic
without icebreakers?"
All of it shows that a main aim is to block the
peoples from calmly looking at issues of war and
peace from their own vantage point, one that is
to their advantage and directly involves the
human factor. It is to divert and divide the
anti-war struggles and striving for anti-war
governments by drawing people into the trap of
looking at matters from the vantage point of the
rich. This requires rejecting their claims and
attributions about cyber warfare and pursuing
relations of friendship and mutual respect with
the peoples of the world.
In the upcoming election in Canada, avoiding
the traps the rulers are setting for the
polity requires pursuing all efforts to defend
the rights of all, calling for an anti-war
government, opposing Canada's integration into
the U.S. war economy and working to Make
Canada a Zone for Peace. This program remains
key to ensuring that Canada becomes a force
for peace at this time, not a force for war as
is currently the case.
This article was published in
Volume 51 Number 8 - August 1, 2021
Article Link:
https://cpcml.ca/Tmlm2021/Articles/M510083.HTM
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|