Canada Joins U.S. Claims of Cyber Attacks and Preparations for War

On July 19, Canada joined the Biden administration in a "coalition" to publicly accuse the Chinese government of malicious cyber activities and irresponsible state behaviour, in language just short of declaring cyber warfare. The joint announcement claims the U.S. uncovered a wide array of cyber attacks against Microsoft by hackers they said had a history of working for China's Ministry of State Security (MSS).

The announcement said China is responsible for the attack on Microsoft's email software -- an attack which infected tens of thousands of businesses, government offices and schools in the U.S. alone. Those joining the U.S. coalition included, besides Canada, the European Union (EU), Australia, Britain, Japan, New Zealand, and the other countries comprising the U.S.-led NATO military alliance.

In connection with the allegations, the U.S. Department of Justice announced criminal charges against those they claimed were the four hackers, for targeting foreign governments and entities in crucial sectors such as defence, education, health care, the maritime and aviation sectors, and for cyber theft of intellectual property for financial gain.

The charges are part of the focus on cyber security by the governments which form part of the U.S. imperialist coalition and attempts by the Biden administration to define what constitutes cyber warfare. Raising the issue of crucial sectors of the economy and life, such as aviation and electrical grids, is to establish them as part of national security and to justify charges of cyber warfare.

For its part, Canada is making cyber security a prominent issue in the conduct of the upcoming federal election. It is marching in lockstep with the Biden administration which is also working to establish rules for what constitute crimes and punishment, while also publicly putting in place the means to back up U.S. claims that a cyber attack was committed by China, Russia, or another country it is accusing of such things. As part of this, the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the new Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) which was formed in 2018 with a budget of more than $3 billion, published a "Joint Cybersecurity Advisory." The Advisory has what the U.S. says are more than 50 "tactics, techniques and procedures" used by hackers associated with China.

This year CISA has already received a funding increase of $650 million, added to what is expected to be $2.3 billion. CISA also has the authority to "hunt proactively" for threats across civilian federal networks and subpoena authority over internet service providers when the agency "detects critical vulnerabilities in national infrastructure." It will encourage the private sector to turn over more information about the cyber threats they face. CISA also serves as a top federal liaison on cyber issues for private-sector owners of what is designated by the government as critical national infrastructure.

A salient problem is that cyber warfare and cyber security are not defined by the government, any more than what constitutes terrorism has ever been defined. It is also known that terrorism charges inside the country have mainly targeted those standing against wars of aggression, or those who are defending the environment and opposing racist police killings or incarcerations at the southern U.S. border. Many expect that U.S. government claims of cyber attacks will follow the same course and that Canada will follow suit, falling in line with the U.S.

A major concern is the method used by President Biden and the U.S. administration to launch accusations and declare crimes and punishment without providing facts or evidence. This method is also used by the government of Canada. Everything is about "appearance," what the rulers say the attacks "look like," what China "might do" and the like. The hackers are said to have a "history of working for China," but that history is not provided. Nor is it said whether there is evidence that they are still working for China. All of this is said to be secret and therefore cannot be divulged.

As the "Joint Security Advisory" shows, the method also involves providing a list of what the U.S. asserts are "tactics, techniques and procedures" that are like, or have the appearance of being, those used by Russia or China. This then is used to say the attacks are made by Russia or China. There is no direct evidence. The basis for identifying the particular "tactics" as belonging to China also remains secret. The assertions and publication of the list serve to create a norm that whenever these same "tactics, techniques and procedures" appear, they can be attributed to Russia or China.

A problem the U.S. government and those appeasing the U.S. government face is that it is next to impossible to attribute specific cyber attacks to particular governments or individuals, especially on an international level. This is because the attacks can be made to look like they are being made by those countries, or coming from particular places, using the very "tactics" cited, when that is not the case. Attribution cannot be made -- a fact already established in various cases which have refuted U.S. claims and shown them to be fraudulent.

The U.S. is simply asserting that attacks can be attributed to China or Russia. For purposes of mobilizing their military bureaucracy and for purposes of creating public opinion, the U.S. asserts that China or Russia are conducting these attacks and that they should be punished. Whatever claims are made by the U.S. about the "tactics, techniques and procedures" used by China or Russia or Iran or others are to be considered valid. In this way the media, pundits, politicians and academics are drawn into a debate about whether Russia or China were involved, while the list of tactics given and the methods used are established as "the norm." The whole process is also a means to generate fear and antagonisms towards China and Russia so as to prepare for war. The Pentagon regularly states that China and Russia are "strategic adversaries," who could target "national strategic infrastructure." Canada also promotes these threats of cyber warfare, as decided by the U.S., to lay the groundwork for justifying war.

Cyber Security Scare Shows that Military Might Fails
to Gain Political Advantage

A problem the U.S. rulers are repeatedly contending with is that even with their military and nuclear superiority, they cannot achieve political advantage. The U.S. spends more on its military than the next eight countries, which include Russia and China, combined. China has, for example, four aircraft carriers. The U.S. has many more and many more nuclear weapons as well as the means to deliver them. Similarly, the "peace dividend" and political advantage that was supposed to emerge with the fall of the Soviet Union did not occur. Today, the U.S., like the liberal democracies in Europe, have dysfunctional governing institutions, civil war conditions among the vying factions of the rulers and widespread dissatisfaction and lack of legitimacy among the people. In Canada, the liberal democratic institutions are also dysfunctional. The integration of the Canadian economy into the U.S. war machine and of the Canadian state with the U.S. imperialist agenda for world domination means that the U.S. civil war scenario spills into the country's political arena. As part of contending with this, the claim is made that the problem with elections, for example, is foreign interference by Russia or China, or Iran, rather than the failure and racist, unrepresentative nature of the existing constitutional order which they demand everyone uphold.

Further, much like the U.S. did with nuclear weapons, they are trying to impose their rules as to what is and is not cyber warfare and what the punishments are and who has authority to impose them. For nuclear weapons the U.S. put in place the notion of secrecy, that information about building nuclear weapons was a state secret and anyone releasing such information was guilty of espionage. They then enforced this with, for example, criminal charges and execution of the Rosenbergs, using this claim of espionage.

Similar efforts are being made concerning cyber warfare and cyber security so as to establish U.S. authority to act, impose punishments and justify imperialist war. People siding with Russia or China can be branded agents of a foreign power, or guilty of treason. While the U.S. openly talks of interfering in Cuba's internet, they are also again promoting anti-communism to provide justification for targeting the many forces supporting Cuba. Further, with Biden's continuing threats, the memory of a potential nuclear confrontation between Russia and the U.S., as occurred with the 1960's missile crisis, has been brought to the fore. So too supporting the people of Palestine, or demanding the peaceful resolution of conflicts or opposing the provocations the U.S. and NATO are engaging in in the Indo-Pacific region are treated as stands that are foreign inspired or in the service of "adversarial states."

Biden's NSA Speech on Cyber Threats and Cyberwar

On July 28 Biden delivered a speech at a gathering of members of the 18 intelligence agencies in the U.S. in McLean, Virginia at the "National Counterterrorism Centre at Liberty Crossing Intelligence Campus." Biden declared that a cyber attack will most likely cause a major war and identified China and Russia as the likely perpetrators. Speaking of the upcoming U.S. mid-term elections, Biden accused Russia of interference. He decried "rampant disinformation that is making it harder and harder for people to access -- assess the facts, be able to make decisions." Pulling his "the U.S. is innocent of any wrong-doing, we are the paradigm of democracy and human rights" card, he protested: "[...] look what Russia is doing already about the 2022 elections and misinformation. It's a pure violation of our sovereignty."

Biden told the audience: "You know, we've seen how cyber threats, including ransomware attacks, increasingly are able to cause damage and disruption to the real world. I can't guarantee this and you're as informed as I am, but I think it's more likely we're going to end up -- well, if we end up in a war, a real shooting war with a major power, it's going to be as a consequence of a cyber breach of great consequence. And it's increasing exponentially -- the capabilities."

He described the U.S. intelligence agencies as "the eyes and ears around the world," stating they are "in the frontlines of our national defence, and in many cases, for the world, through us."

Speaking about Russia, Biden spoke like a hoodlum. His overall approach is to become personal to give the impression that he has the inside track  "When I was with Mr. Putin, who has a real problem -- he is -- he's sitting on top of an economy that has nuclear weapons and oil wells and nothing else. Nothing else. Their economy is -- what? -- the eighth smallest in the world now -- largest in the world?  He knows -- he knows he's in real trouble, which makes him even more dangerous, in my view."  

So too when he spoke about China. "Take a look at China. I've spent more time with Xi Jinping as a world leader than anyone else has. [...] He is deadly earnest about becoming the most powerful military force in the world, as well as the largest -- the most prominent economy in the world by the mid-40s -- the 2040s. It's real."

Biden seems to think that accusing Russia and China of what the U.S. itself is all about provides proof that Russia and China, and not the U.S., pose the greatest danger to world peace at this time.

Later in his speech, Biden suggested that there was a need to also work with Russia and China to deal with "existential problems" facing the entire world. This in fact serves to further reveal how the world is being put on a war-footing. Biden said, "at the same time, we have to work in cooperation with nations like China and Russia that are our competitors -- and possibly mortal competitors down the road -- in the context of there's -- to meet the existential threats, for example, of climate change. There are certain things that are in our mutual interest.  But we can't -- we can't be lulled into thinking that that's enough and that we don't really have to keep a watchful eye on what the ultimate objective of the other team is. But there are things where we should be -- where we should be cooperating."

Biden made it more than clear that such cooperation must never lose sight of the U.S. pursuit of domination and control. "A dramatically warming Arctic is opening up competition for resources that once were hard to access.  I had -- as they say in Southern Delaware -- they talk at you like this, you know what I mean? -- I had a "Come to Jesus" meeting, an "altar call" with Mr. Putin about what he thinks is what Russia's property is in the Arctic. China looking very closely at that as well, where they are. That's what I mean about the world changing. What is that going to do to our strategic doctrine in the next 2, 5, 10, 12 years, when you can circumvent the Arctic without icebreakers?"

All of it shows that a main aim is to block the peoples from calmly looking at issues of war and peace from their own vantage point, one that is to their advantage and directly involves the human factor. It is to divert and divide the anti-war struggles and striving for anti-war governments by drawing people into the trap of looking at matters from the vantage point of the rich. This requires rejecting their claims and attributions about cyber warfare and pursuing relations of friendship and mutual respect with the peoples of the world.

In the upcoming election in Canada, avoiding the traps the rulers are setting for the polity requires pursuing all efforts to defend the rights of all, calling for an anti-war government, opposing Canada's integration into the U.S. war economy and working to Make Canada a Zone for Peace. This program remains key to ensuring that Canada becomes a force for peace at this time, not a force for war as is currently the case. 


This article was published in

Volume 51 Number 8 - August 1, 2021

Article Link:
https://cpcml.ca/Tmlm2021/Articles/M510083.HTM


    

Website:  www.cpcml.ca   Email:  editor@cpcml.ca