April 14, 2014 - No. 42
Small Parties Oppose Bill C-23,
the Anti-Democratic "Fair Elections Act"
Bill C-23 Must Not Pass
Small
Parties
Oppose
Bill
C-23, the Anti-Democratic "Fair Elections Act"
• Bill C-23 Must Not Pass
- Joint Press Release
Self-Serving
Eulogies
and
Undeserved
Praise
• The State
Funeral for Former Finance Minister and the Conservative's Crass
Opportunism
• Former Finance Minister Should Be Held
Responsible for Economic Damage, Criminalizing Canadian Workers and
Repeated War Budgets - Tony Seed
Small Parties Oppose Bill C-23, the
Anti-Democratic "Fair Elections Act"
Bill C-23 Must Not Pass
- Joint Press Release -
Ottawa - April 11, 2014 --
Registered political
parties currently without representation in the House of Commons met in
Ottawa to consider Bill C-23, An Act to amend the Canada
Elections Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to
certain Acts.
The parties listed below
agreed to issue the following statement. These parties are also
concerned about many provisions in Bill C-23 aside from those outlined
in the statement and they encourage the media to contact them
individually.
The Conservative Party of Canada, overseen by
Prime
Minister Stephen Harper, is hoping to steal the next federal election.
Bill C-23, the so-called Fair
Elections Act, is their game plan. We are
working together to stop the Conservatives, and to protect every
Canadian's right to vote in a fair and honest
election that is free of voter suppression schemes, of election fraud,
of the denial of fundamental rights, and all watched over by an
independent and effective Elections Canada.
The Conservatives and Stephen Harper are terrified
because they can't win a fair election; they hope they can win a rigged
one.
Opposition to Stephen Harper's Bill C-23 is almost
universal,
condemned by national and international election officials and experts
on democracy and elections. It is supported only by Conservative
politicians who hope to benefit from its worst provisions. Bill C-23
helps people commit election fraud and get
away with it; encourages mayhem, confusion, and long delays on election
day; and deprives hundreds of thousand of Canadians of their right to
vote.
Bill C-23 goes even further. It prevents Elections
Canada from
warning Canadians who are targeted by fraud and voter suppression
schemes. It even bars Elections Canada from encouraging citizens to
vote, especially youth, new Canadians and First Nations people.
From now until the next election and beyond, if
necessary, we will
be working together to protect Canadians from Stephen Harper's and the
Conservatives' cowardly, self-serving attack on their fundamental right
to vote. We will fight for our fellow Canadians and their hard won
rights wherever we can -- in the
courts, in the streets, in elections, on social media, in class
rooms -- wherever Canadians who believe in democratic rights and honest
government gather.
We reach out to all Canadians to help us stop Stephen
Harper and the
Conservatives stealing their elections and stealing their rights.
For further information contact:
• Animal Alliance
Environment Voters Party of Canada, 416-462-9541, www.
environmentvoters.org
• Canadian Action Party,
519-852-8279, www.canadianactionparty.org
• Christian Heritage Party,
819-281-6686, 1-888-868-3247, www.chp.ca
• Communist Party of Canada,
416-469-2446, www.communist-party.ca
• Libertarian Party of Canada,
613-288-9089, www.libertarian.ca
• Marijuana Party of Canada,
514-507-5188, www.marijuanaparty.ca
• Marxist-Leninist Party of Canada,
416-253-4475,
www.mlpc.ca
• Party for Accountability,
Competency and Transparency, 416-567-6913, www.onlineparty.ca
• Pirate Party of Canada,
(877) 978-2023, www.pirateparty.ca
• Progressive Canadian Party,
905-853-8949, www.pcparty.org
• Rhinoceros Party,
514-903-9450, www.neorhino.ca
Self-Serving Eulogies and Undeserved
Praise
The State Funeral for Former Finance Minister and
the Conservative's Crass Opportunism
In today's TML
we are posting an article on the real accomplishments
of the former Finance Minister who died on April 10. It is all about
nation-wrecking with a program to pay the rich, increase funding for
war
and annexation and destroy the public authority by starving social
programs. Despite this, the monopoly-controlled media are full of
praise for the former Finance Minister and
his budgets and it was announced that he would be honoured with a state
funeral on Wednesday, April 16. All of this comes at a time the
Conservatives are wracked with scandal and are railroading a bill
through
the Commons and the Senate, Bill C-23, that
destroys Canada's electoral process to favour their own re-election.
Now, the other shoe is dropping. In an item published in The Hill Times today, we
hear that even though the next election is supposed to take place on
October 19, 2015, "some Tory insiders and opposition parties say Prime
Minister Stephen Harper could decide
to trigger it earlier to take advantage of momentum generated from next
year's expected balanced federal budget with billions of dollars of
surplus.
"'If he's got a budget and it's balanced and he wants to
sprinkle
some goodies, this is a good opportunity to do it [call an election]
and then go, and rather than sit there and lose all that momentum that
the budget will give you,' said Keith Beardsley, former deputy chief of
staff to Prime Minister Harper (Calgary
Southwest, Alta.) who now is a partner at True North Public Affairs."
The Hill Times
says: "Annual federal budgets are usually tabled in
February or March. Next year's budget is likely to run a $6-billion
surplus and the Harper government is expected to announce a number of
tax breaks for Canadians including income-splitting, a controversial
tax measure that would mainly be
beneficial to couples with one high-income spouse. Conservatives are
banking on gaining wide popularity and momentum after this budget."
The crass opportunism of the Harper dictatorship and
so-called major
political parties is such that all of this is seen as par for the
course. It is the Prime Minister's prerogative to call an election
whenever he sees fit, just as he passed a fixed election date law when
that suited him to push his neo-liberal conception
of accountability. The essence of what this neo-liberal notion of
accountability means is that Canadians are to exercise no control
whatsoever over the decisions which affect their lives and that is what
former Finance Minister Jim Flaherty was also all about. To promote
this rejection of accountability by holding a
state funeral which serves to praise the cover up to the skies is
despicable.
A veteran Conservative insider quoted by The Hill Times said: "'Time is not
on his
[Harper's]
side. The longer you're in there [government], the more likelihood that
something's going to happen. After more than eight years in government,
things are not the same as they were in 2006 when [Harper got elected].
It's a very different scenario,'
said the source, adding that the Nigel Wright-Michael Duffy issue could
also play a key role on when the next election is going to happen. So
far, the RCMP investigation is ongoing and there doesn't seem to be an
end anywhere in sight.
"Conservative insiders and Mr. Beardsley all point to
their party's
ongoing advertising campaign against Liberal Party Leader Justin
Trudeau (Papineau, Que.), the government's increasing ads promoting the
Conservative Economic Action Plan and the government's partisan
hardline against Chief Electoral Officer
Marc Mayrand as reflecting a hyperpartisanship from the government that
usually only becomes this obvious in pre-writ weeks.
"'That's [advertising and
partisan hardline] very uncommon this
far
in advance,' said Mr. Beardsley. "There's no real reason for the party
to be doing saturation advertising, not this far in advance. That's one
thing that has people paying attention. The bill's [Fair Election Act]
going to pass, they've got a majority.
So, there's no need to [attack the chief electoral officer]. They're
almost in that sort of pre-election mindset where it's almost daily war
with your opponent.'
"Mr. Beardsley also confirmed that he's already getting
résumés from
some Hill staffers who want to secure a job sooner, just in case the
Conservatives decide to call an election after the budget and all of a
sudden there're hundreds of Hill staffers looking for jobs," The Hill
Times writes.
The state funeral for Jim Flaherty is yet another case
of the Conservative Party's use of state funds to promote itself and
the financial oligarchy's neo-liberal austerity budgets and
nation-wrecking. It is part and parcel of the electoral coup being
rolled out through maximum fraud and disinformation.
The two-party system and
parliamentary equilibrium
which prevailed in the past was based on the premise that the party in
power is replaced with the party in opposition when the former's
program became discredited. This has long ceased to function. Elections
today
are electoral coups against the polity where voting "for the lesser
evil" is no longer a sure bet. Going all
out to build the Workers' Opposition to nation-wrecking and the
anti-social offensive requires that organized contingents of workers,
youth and students and associations of Canadian citizens and residents
must oppose the restructuring of the state which is permitting private
monopoly interests to directly take over
the state institutions, from the civil service to financial, security
and correctional services, as well as the armed forces, while
everything to do with the
public authority is destroyed. It is all about upholding the modern
notion of individual and collective rights which belong to the holder
by virtue of their being. Rights are not privileges
which can be given or taken away by a strata with the privileges to do
so.
It is urgent to implement a modern conception of rights
and fight for arrangements based on such a modern conception. It
provides the opposition to the current state of affairs with a sound
foundation which will defeat the attempts of the cartel party system to
usurp the decision-making power through electoral coups.
Across the country, efforts to defeat the Harper
dictatorship are being mounted. In this regard, the opposition must not
permit the issue to become opposing this or that policy with a
policy-objective that is supposed to be
better. It is not policy-objectives that are implemented, as the
practice
of the former Finance Minister shows, when it comes to anything that
serves the interests of the people and not the rich. However,
policy objectives do serve to cover up whose interests are served and
the ongoing nation-wrecking.
All Out to Uphold Public Right Against
Private Monopoly Interests!
Manufacturing Yes, Nation-Wrecking No!
Whose Resources and Whose Democracy? Our Resources and Our Democracy!
Who Decides? We Decide!
Former Finance Minister Should Be Held Responsible for
Economic Damage, Criminalizing Canadian Workers and Repeated War Budgets
- Tony Seed -
Workers demonstrate
outside of Flaherty's campaign office in
Whitby-Oshawa during 2008 election.
The media is going non-stop in its eulogizing of Jim
Flaherty (1949-2014), who passed away suddenly April 10. Until his
recent retirement, Flaherty had been federal Finance Minister since the
2006 electoral coup that brought the Harper government to power.
The dominant media and political discourse advances the
view that regardless of one's individual views on Flaherty's policies,
he had human qualities; he "put partisanship aside" in the common
pursuit of "growing the Canadian economy," and hence "politicians of
all stripes are mourning him." Possibly the executives
in charge of media news wants a combination of the two: a merciless
exploiter and a man who gives such a program a human face.
Further, CBC TV exclaims that, "Our Finance Minister is
being remembered around the world" and is "globally respected." The
tributes emanate exclusively from the ranks of the rich G-8 countries,
which are presented as "the international community." They include the
globalist International Monetary Fund and
Jack Lew, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, who states Flaherty made
"sure that workers had a chance to retire with dignity" -- a bald-faced
lie: the U.S. government itself has declared the next generation of
workers shall have no pensions.
Perhaps haunted by the memory of retired and active
Canadian workers demonstrating in front of Flaherty's campaign office
in Whitby-Oshawa in 2008 (e.g., CAW retired auto workers,
steelworkers), CBC TV
asked rhetorically later in the day, "How should Canadians remember
him," as if it had not already made up
its mind.
It is hardly fortuitous that the Harper government has
put flags at half mast for its right-hand man, and a state funeral is
to be held on Wednesday, April 16 in Toronto, an extremely rare event
in the political life of Canada and usually reserved for deceased prime
ministers.
A brief review of some of the main features of
Flaherty's record shows that he should be held responsible for economic
damage, criminalizing Canadian workers and repeated war budgets.
Flaherty, a corporate lawyer by profession, was a political
representative of the financial elite and a neo-liberal champion
of its anti-union, anti-worker, anti-social and anti-national
offensive. He was federal minister of finance from 2006-2014 and
Minister of Finance in the Ontario provincial government of Mike Harris
from 2001-2002,
when he was demoted to a lesser post.
Only a man with no social conscience or responsibility
could call for jailing the homeless, as he did during his unsuccessful
campaign for leadership of the Ontario Conservative Party in 2002,
which focused on "law and order" themes as well as privatization of the
Liquor Control Board of Ontario. Flaherty was
defeated again in 2005 by John Tory; then -- along with other cohorts
such as John Baird of the Harris "common sense revolution," which had
been fought against tooth and nail by the Ontario working class -- he
joined
forces with Harper at the federal level. By virtue of his appointment
as Minister of Finance in 2006, he
also became a Governor of the World Bank and the International Monetary
Fund, which has done so much damage to the economies of dependent
countries, and was designated federal minister in charge of the Greater
Toronto area. His wife Christine Elliott inherited his seat in the
provincial Legislature.
The sanctification of Flaherty's reign aims to obscure
both the direction of the Canadian state as well as to insinuate that
the continuous resistance waged by the Canadian people has been merely
a matter of objection to this or that individual "policy" adopted as
part of the overall good of "growing the economy."
Speaking of the essence of Flaherty's last federal budget, TML Daily
pointed out:
"Falling federal program spending beginning with the
Liberal governments of Chretien and Martin and now Harper has sunk to
13 per cent of the gross domestic product, the lowest percentage in
over 70 years. Billions of dollars in program cuts from last year's
budget are set to begin. Along with the current
budget's program spending freeze, this will reduce overall program
spending on health, education, aboriginal and veterans' affairs, etc.,
to levels not seen since the pre-WWII period.
"Everyone is now familiar with the reductions in
Employment Insurance and the denuding of regulations and collapse of a
public authority that is supposed to protect the people's food supply,
transportation system and other features of a modern society. The
essence of the measures to destroy social programs
and public services is to wreck any public authority that serves to
protect the well-being and security of Canadians and restrict monopoly
right."
Instead of program spending on the well-being of the
Canadian people and nation-building, Flaherty's budgets have diverted
increasing amounts of public funds to private interests. This has been
done openly by funneling public money to the monopolies -- for example,
to the foreign, mainly U.S. auto monopolies
through his innovation fund -- and in a more hidden fashion by
providing
private interests with public funds from the federal treasury using
public-private partnerships to build infrastructure and prepare for war.
Working Canadians will not be shedding a tear for
Flaherty. At a demonstration at his office in 2011, Len
Harrison, the chair of the CAW Retired Workers Executive, stated,
"Flaherty stabbed us in the back. Instead of doing what he promised to
do for pensioners so that CPP rises slowly so that everybody
has a pension, he backed off and now he wants it to go to his friend,
the financial community." Close to 70 per cent of Canadians have no
company pension plan at all and have to rely on the Canada Pension Plan
and old age supplements in their retirement days, which means ending
one's life in poverty. Flaherty
had reneged on a pledge to strengthen the CPP and instead went with a
pay-the-rich private savings plan, as well as for provided no funding
in that year's budget to basic social programs such as education,
health care, affordable housing and universal daycare.
The Hamilton steelworkers, Air Canada and Canada Post
workers together with Vale, Xstrata and Resolute Forest Products
(AbitibiBowater) workers throughout Canada all had to take bold steps
to defend their rights against both executive thieves and the Harper
dictatorship, in whose court Flaherty held front
and centre.
Criminalizing Canadian Workers
Airline workers
oppose back-to-work legislation, outside Labour
Minister Lisa Raitt's office, October 13, 2011.
|
The 2011 airline workers' strike exemplifies Flaherty's
agit-prop role and how he used his position as a Minister of the Crown
to intervene against working people. Even though the damage to the
economy from the strike was directly the fault of Air Canada and labour
relations is not a ministerial responsibility,
Flaherty joined Labour Minister Lisa Raitt in supporting the
preparations for back-to-work legislation to criminalize the workers
instead of defending Canadian workers. Can this be called a human
quality? Through unjust and disruptive parliamentary and bureaucratic
measures to negate the rights of airline as well
as postal workers, the state machine led by the Harperites stood
exposed as a tool of the owners of big capital against the working
class.
Air Canada, for instance, sought to use its dominant
position to renege on its pension obligations and impose a two-tier
workplace, even though these obligations were a condition for the
court's acceptance of the plan of arrangement provided by Air Canada
for it not to seek bankruptcy protection (which it also
used to make a big score on the workers' backs).
The fact that the government of Canada and Flaherty
personally, participated in brokering that plan of arrangement means
that they neglected their duty to defend the workers as well as being
in blatant conflict of interest. The workers have a good case to hold
him and the government to account.
Flaherty publicly acknowledged his direct
responsibility. "I've been very mindful of the Air Canada situation. I
was involved in it back in 2009 when we worked out an agreement with
the unions and management about the pension situation to buy some time
-- several years -- with respect to the pension issue there.
But this is of economic consequence. I'm pleased that the Minister of
Labour is going to act."
A Nation Wrecker
Monopolies such as Air Canada, Canada Post, U.S. Steel
and the auto, forest and agricultural monopolies all cite their alleged
concern for the economy -- which they called "making Canada
competitive" -- to justify using their dominant position to extort
concessions from
the workers. Their political
representatives and the media feign that the government does not
intervene to stop these attempts at extortion. Instead of holding the
companies to account, Flaherty and the Harper government joined them in
citing concern for the economy and intervened to criminalize or isolate
the workers and let the companies
off scot-free.
Flaherty and his cabinet declared in 2011, in the words
of Tony Clement, that "now U.S. Steel can do whatever they want." U.S.
Steel took over Stelco Inc. and put 1,500 workers out of work at its
Hamilton and Lake Erie plants in 2009 for refusing to kowtow to the
concessions it demanded. It closed the production
of steel at the Hamilton Stelco works, allegedly for good in 2013, in
violation of all its contractual commitments under the Foreign
Investment Review Act. Local 1005 of the United Steelworkers
Union in
particular courageously drew a line in the sand on the pension issue,
concessions, the wrecking of manufacturing
and the elimination of steel production as a national asset of the
Canadian economy. Instead of responding to the union's measured
proposals which have won the support of the Hamilton civic government,
the Harper, McGuinty and Wynne governments cowardly facilitated the
destruction
of Stelco. Today Canadian steel-making
is wrecked. The cratering of manufacturing, especially in Ontario and
Quebec, lessens the amount of wealth workers produce and the amount
available for social programs, and pushed the annexation of Canada into
the U.S. empire.
According to Local 1005's newsletter, Information
Update, "Since invading Canada in 2007 to seize control of the
Stelco
steel complex, U.S. Steel has pushed its politics of doom. It has
preached the futility of steel production in Hamilton U.S. Steel sees
the destruction of steel production in Canada as a means
to weaken competition for steel production at its plants in the United
States, which for many years have had low levels of capacity
utilization." Yet Flaherty capitulated to and lay down with U.S. Steal,
rather than standing with steelworkers and Canada's producers.
Disinformation on the Nature of Flaherty's Budgets
The Harper-Flaherty mania
to reduce corporate taxes and
then make the resultant deficits and debt an issue has been a preferred
political and ideological weapon. Harper and Flaherty repeatedly
declared in a dismissive tone to Canadians: These demands for pensions
for all,
a national child care system and
public medicare and pharmacare and other means to ensure people's
well-being are simply not affordable.
The ex-Finance Minister is applauded for "rescuing"
Canada from the 2008 recession, though there was no shortage of public
resources to alleviate the brutality of its consequences, with a budget
described as "non-ideological" because it budgeted for a deficit. The
disinformation includes stories as to how he "stood
up" to Harper or went against his "conservatism" as well as the demands
of extremist centres such as the Fraser Institute and Frontier Centre
which called for deep wage cuts, etc., to eliminate the deficit.
By seeming to follow his own prescription and heart, not
those of the extremists, Flaherty could pretend his budgets were
"moderate," "mainstream," "non-partisan" and "non-ideological" --
not right-wing extremist, conservative or ideological instruments of
big capital.
However, resources were mobilized by the state for
private, not public ends. And that is declared not ideological!
One of the most common features promoted by Flaherty,
for example, was neo-liberal privatization. In 2009, a new agency was
created, PPP Canada, that required municipalities to "partner" with
private corporations to finance and or deliver public infrastructure
and
services for a profit. The initial budget was one billion
dollars.
Budgets for Annexation and War
Flaherty put budget
after budget in the service of
the United States of North American Monopolies in its drive for global
domination, especially through Obama's Asia-Pivot strategy. This is
characterized by the militarization of the
economy, creation of the
North American Security Perimeter, integration
of the armed forces and their deployment to the farthest reaches of the
U.S. Empire. While overall program spending has been slashed, as noted
above, Flaherty more than doubled the federal military budget in
the past eight years from the annual $11 billion spent by the Paul
Martin Liberals. An estimated $100
billion is earmarked for a multi-year program to build a new fleet of
bluewater naval warships and coast guard vessels to open up the North
West Passage for the oil and gas monopolies. Additional billions of
dollars are being expended on the Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic coasts
for so-called "gateway" schemes -- involving
the modernization of port and intermodal transportation
infrastructure -- to speed up the transport of goods, resources and
military personnel and armaments from overseas to the American
heartland and vice-versa.
Dictatorship
On October 4, 2011 Flaherty introduced Bill C-13, An Act
to Implement Certain Provisions of the 2011 Budget as Updated on June
6, 2011 and Other Measures. The name of the bill gave the
impression
that it dealt strictly with the funding of individual government
programs. However, this was not
the case. It included substantial changes to the Canada Pension Plan
including schemes to establish individual savings plans in place of
public pensions, changes to international trade regulations, the Canada
Human Rights Act and the Canada
Elections
Act. Although not referred to
as such, it was in effect an omnibus
bill (644-pages long and divided into 22 parts) and contained broad
changes to the Canadian state.
Introducing the bill, Flaherty stated: "Our Government
is focused on what matters to Canadians -- creating jobs and promoting
economic growth. While Canada has the strongest job growth record in
the G-7 with nearly 600,000 net new jobs created since July 2009 and
the IMF projects that we will have among
the strongest economic growth in the G-7 over the next two years, we
are not immune from global economic turbulence. That's why we need to
stay the course and implement the Next Phase of Canada's Economic
Action Plan." In an attempt to prevent any substantial discussion on
the direction in which the bill
takes Canada, on October 6, 2011 the government moved to limit debate
on the
bill to three sitting days even though it controlled a majority in the
Parliament.
Necessity to Build a Workers' Opposition
The challenge people face
is to unite to stop and turn
around this anti-social direction of the Harper government that puts
the demands and narrow private interests of the global monopolies ahead
of Canadians and the public interest.
The refusal of the global monopolies and their political
representatives such as the former Finance Minister to recognize public
right
and the rights of the actual producers, the working class, created
disequilibrium in the country. Disequilibrium is reflected in the
inability and unwillingness of the global monopolies and
political class to solve the economic crisis in favour of the people.
Even worse, the global monopolies and political class are using the
crisis as an excuse to extort concessions, consolidate their economic
and political power and block the working class from assuming positions
of authority to put into practice its own
pro-social program and agenda to resolve problems and the crisis in a
manner that serves the interests of the people and society.
The Canadian economy is
affected by both conscious and
spontaneous factors. Government intervention in the economy through
budgets and policies such as free trade can directly affect the
spontaneous factors. The conscious and spontaneous factors set the
direction of the economy for good or bad. To defend
its rights and the rights of all and set a new direction for the
economy that favours the people and nation-building, the working class
movement has to intervene in the economy with its own program to
influence the conscious and spontaneous factors.
These actions include examining the content of
government intervention, such as federal, provincial and municipal
budgets, and determining how the government's conscious policies will
affect the spontaneous factors and the general direction of the
economy. From this analysis the working class movement can
both hold the government to account for its actions and develop its
grasp of its own independent agenda to intervene in the economy to
defend its rights and the rights of all.
The sheer volume of the media's inhuman and ahistorical
eulogy of a finance minister which will reach a crescendo around the
state funeral on April 16 itself highlights the absence of a powerful
and effective Workers' Opposition that can mobilize the people for a
change in the direction of the economy. The
issue before Canadians is to do all they can to organize and build a
Workers' Opposition.
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Read The Marxist-Leninist
Daily
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|