November 9, 2010 - No. 190
Anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin
Wall Used to Criminalize Conscience
• Anniversary
of the Fall of the Berlin Wall Used to Criminalize Conscience
• First They Fake Berlin - Dougal
MacDonald
• Romanians Say Communism Was Better than
Capitalism - James Cross, 21st Century Socialism
Second Annual International Conference on Combatting Anti-Semitism
• Playing the "Nazi Card" to Criminalize Dissent
Anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall Used to
Criminalize Conscience
November 9, 1989 is celebrated by world reaction as the
date that the Berlin Wall "fell." Each year, the most reactionary
elements in society use this anniversary as an occasion to create
massive ideological confusion about the real significance of the
historical events of 1989-91 in Eastern Europe. Over and over
it is proclaimed that these events marked the "victory of capitalism"
and the "end of communism." It is as if announcing such distortions
often
enough can make them come true. A dogmatic rendering of
both capitalism and communism distorts the significance
of unfolding events and what can be done to resolve the crises in which
the world is mired in a manner which favours the peoples. The goal of
this anti-communist offensive was then and is now to get the working
people to end their fight for a society which provides their rights
with a guarantee. The peoples are to be so disinformed by governments
and
state agencies and the monopoly owned media that they are to be reduced
to the status of abject slaves.
As it stands, the more corrupt the financial oligarchies
are proven to be, the more oligopolies impose their dictate on the
workers as if they are their "possessions." The more slavish
governments in the
service of the financial oligarchs and oligopolies show themselves to
be, the more people are supposed to submit
to their dictate. And all of this dictate is carried out in the name of
democracy, liberty, human rights and freedom of markets. In the name of
these high ideals, straightforward fascist politics are being pushed.
On this anniversary, in Ottawa, an international
conference has been convoked in the name of opposing anti-semitism,
claiming anti-semitism is only against Jews, not Arabs, and that to
criticize Israel and Zionism is anti-semitic and thus a hate crime.
There is a lot of evidence to conclude that the aim of the main
promoters of this conference is to criminalize the
conscience of all those who oppose the terrorist practices of the state
of Israel or oppose Zionism. In the name of defending what are called
democratic institutions and national security, laws are being changed
to equate the national interest with the values of the big powers and
force the peoples to submit to these
values.
In Canada and around the world, the workers and peoples
are opposing the shifting of the burden of the pay the rich schemes
onto their backs and the criminalization of dissent. They are opposing
the striving of the U.S. superpower
for world domination as well as the contention of the other big powers
with the U.S. for that same
domination.
This week in Seoul, south Korea, massive demonstrations
are taking place against the G20, even as the criminalization of the
activists who opposed the meeting of the G20 in Toronto continues and
the peoples everywhere continue to fight for their right to defend
themselves and fight for societies over
which they exercise control.
The more the dangers increase, the more these struggles
must be put on a sound organizational footing so that the peoples are
able to avert the dangers which lie ahead if matters are left in the
hands of the forces which represent alien class and national
interests.
First They Fake Berlin
- Dougal MacDonald -
The November 9 anniversary of the "fall of the Berlin
Wall" is always an occasion for those in the imperialist camp such as
the Harper government to step forward and spout their anti-communist
lies and slanders. But the past is the objective occurrence of events
and there is only one past. For example, on February
2, 1943, the Soviet Union defeated Nazi Germany at the Battle of
Stalingrad, which was the turning point of the Second World War. That
is the past; it happened and nothing can change that. But besides the
actual past, there is historical falsification of the past by certain
human beings. Churchill, speaking for the
Anglo-American imperialists, said: "History will be kind to us because
we will write it."
The liberation of
Berlin by the Soviet Red Army in May 1945.
|
Berlin has long been the focus of post-war historical
falsifications. Just as the fall of the wall in 1989 and the "reuniting
of Germany" in 1990 supposedly marked the "end of communism," the
so-called Berlin Blockade and Berlin Airlift of 1948-49 supposedly
marked the Soviet Union's initiation of
the Cold War. But in March 1946, Winston Churchill had already started
the Cold War by attacking the Soviet Union in his warmongering "Iron
Curtain" speech in Fulton, Missouri: "From Stettin in the Baltic to
Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the
Continent. Behind that line lie all the
capitals of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe."
Churchill was echoing his mentor, Nazi Minister of Propaganda Joseph
Goebbels, who had stated a year earlier: "If the German people lay down
their weapons, the Soviets, according to the agreement between
Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin would occupy
all of East and Southeast Europe along with the greater part of the
Reich. An iron curtain would fall over this enormous territory
controlled by the Soviet Union, behind which nations would be
slaughtered" (Article titled "Das Jahr 2000" in the newspaper Das Reich, February 25, 1945, pp.
1-2).
What then are the facts about the 1948-49 "Berlin
Blockade" and "Berlin Airlift"? At the end of the Second World War, by
the 1945 Potsdam Agreement, the four allies divided defeated Germany
into four zones: Soviet, American, British and French. The city of
Berlin was located in the Soviet Zone
but all four countries' military governments were represented in its
administration. A main provision agreed upon at Potsdam for the setting
up of a new post-war German democratic state was economic unity among
all zones. From the beginning, the U.S. imperialists pursued a policy
of splitting rather than unifying
Germany and of trying to isolate the Soviet Union, first merging the
U.S. and British Zones into Bizonia and then into Trizonia by including
the French Zone.
In 1948, the U.S. and the other Western Powers announced
their intention to form a separate West Germany, which was created in
May 1949. "East Germany" did not yet exist. The Soviet Union called for
renewed four-power talks to resolve the issue, but the Western Powers
ignored the call and instituted
a separate Western currency reform, even though the Potsdam Agreement
called for economic unity, which required unified currency. The goal of
the Western introduction of the new Deutschemark currency into Berlin
was to try to destabilize not only the economy of part of Berlin but
also of the whole Soviet Zone
of which Berlin was a part. It was warfare on the economic front. To
prevent economic disruption of the people's lives, the Soviet Union
instituted restrictions on traffic to and from Berlin, which the
Western Powers labelled a "blockade."
The Western Powers responded to the justifiable
restrictions by initiating the "Berlin Airlift" of food on June 24,
1948, after falsely alleging that the people of Berlin were starving
and were "victims of a famine." For purposes of anti-Soviet propaganda,
the completely unnecessary airlift delivered food
to the supposedly blockaded people in the non-Soviet zones of Berlin
until May 12, 1949. To show its good faith, the Soviet Union
immediately offered to supply enough food for the entire Berlin
population (rather than just the Soviet zone), which it began doing
daily in July 1948. Meanwhile, the Western powers
continued to pour out a stream of false allegations such as that the
Soviets refused to negotiate, that the Soviets planned to overthrow the
Berlin municipal government, that the Soviets wanted a new world war,
and so on.
In August 1948, in Moscow, the four powers finally
agreed on lifting the travel restrictions and introducing a uniform
currency in Berlin but the U.S. imperialists quickly broke the
agreement and stayed their course because such changes would interfere
with their plans to partition Germany and create
a separate West German state. The imperialists wanted to form an
aggressive military bloc directed against the Soviet Union and the
people's democracies and divert attention from questions of peace and
disarmament. A divided Germany was the plan of the U.S. imperialists
from the start, a policy that they later
also carried out in Korea and Viet Nam. What happened in the past
reveals that all the modern-day imperialist hosannas about Germany
finally being reunified are complete rubbish because it was the
imperialists who deliberately divided Germany in the first place.
The history of Berlin shows how historical falsification
"works" by repeatedly presenting lies about the objective past and by
suppressing -- including by force -- the presentation of the truth.
Hitler once said, "Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it,
and eventually they will believe it." Nazi Minister
of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels was a master of the big lie technique.
The Nazis constantly backed up their lies with force; Hitler's lie that
Poland had attacked Germany was followed by the invasion of Poland on
September 1, 1939, resulting in the deaths of more than 3 million
Polish people. The U.S. imperialists learned
well from Hitler and the Nazis, and for decades a major weapon against
the working class and people of the world has been the imperialists'
repetition of historical falsifications, backed up by force.
Romanians Say Communism Was
Better than Capitalism
- James Cross, 21st Century Socialism,
October 17, 2010 -
According to a recent poll conducted in Romania, a large
majority of those who expressed an opinion stated that life was better
when the Communist Party was in power than it is now under capitalism.
Most people gave a favourable view about communism in principle, with
over 60% saying that communism
is 'a good idea.' The pollsters noted a significant increase in
sympathy with communist ideas since a similar poll was carried out four
years ago.
Conducted in August and September this year by the
Romanian polling organisation CSOP, the survey found that over 49% of
respondents agreed that life was better under the late Communist leader
Nicolae Ceauşescu, while only 23% think that life is better today. The
remainder gave a neutral or 'don't know' answer.
The reasons given by the participants for their positive
evaluation of the communist period were mainly economic, with the
availability of jobs cited by 62% and decent living conditions by 26%;
the provision of housing for all was referred to by 19%.
The survey was sponsored by the government-funded
organisation IICMER (the Institute for Investigating the Crimes of
Communism and the Memory of Romanian Exile), in order to help guide the
instutute in its work to 'educate' the population about the evils of
communism. Among the most bitter
disappointments for that organisation were the answers given to a
question which asked whether the particpants or their families had
suffered under the communist system.
A mere 7% of respondents said they had suffered under
communism, with a further 6% asserting that although they personally
had not suffered, a family member had suffered. Again, the reasons
given were mainly economic, with most of the small group who had direct
or family experience of suffering
under Communist Party rule citing the shortages which occurred in the
1980s when Romania implemented an austerity programme in order to repay
the country's foreign debt. A small fraction of the minority who had
suffered during the communist period said they had lost out by having
their property nationalised,
and a handful (6% of those who had experience of suffering under
communism) recalled that they, or a family member, had been arrested at
some time while the communists were in power.
Putting their best spin on the outcome of the survey,
the IICMER noted that pluralities of those polled (41% and 42%
respectively) agreed with the statements that the communist regime was
criminal or illegitimate. A substantial minority (37% and 31%)
explicitly disagreed with those propositions and
the rest were neutral or gave no opinion.
Also, although most participants gave a positive view
about communism, with only 27% expressing disagreement with communism
in principle, most of those who gave a definite opinion were of the
view that communist ideas had not been put into practice in the best
way before the regime
change in 1989. 14% gave the unequivocal response that communism was
both a good idea and was well implemented in Romania.
Thus a large proportion of Romanians who are undecided
on the question of whether or not communism was a legal or legitimate
form of government, and a big majority of those who say that communism
was incorrectly conducted, are nevertheless clear in their view that
the system as practiced under
the Romanian Communist Party -- warts and all -- provided a
better life for the people than that which is provided under present
day capitalism.
Communist Achievements
Before the communists took power in Romania, most people
were illiterate and had no access to health care. Few in the
countryside, where the majority lived, had sanitation or electricity.
Infant mortality rates were among the worst in Europe, and most people
died from
hunger or disease before reaching the age of 40. Romania had a right
wing regime which allied itself with Hitler during World War Two, and
as part of that alliance Romania's capitalist administration sent most
of the country's Jewish population to the Nazi death camps.
Achieving power following the Soviet victory against
Nazi Germany in 1945, the Romanian communists -- who had hitherto been
an illegal underground group fighting the pro-fascist government and
the Nazis -- numbered only a few thousand. However, they succeeded in
mobilising the enthusiasm of
the people to rebuild their war-shattered country. Illiteracy was
almost wiped out, health services were massively improved and extended,
and -- as the participants in the CSOP survey point out -- jobs, homes
and decent living standards became available for everybody.
Buoyed by these successes, the Romanian communist
government led by Nicolae Ceauşescu went into debt during the 1970s,
buying expensive industrial equipment from the West in order to
increase the country's economic growth rate on the expectation that
Western countries would increase their
imports from Romania. That strategy failed, and the austerity programme
that was implemented in order to pay off the national debt gave rise to
increasing resentment.
Nicolae Ceauşescu and his wife Elena were executed by
firing squad on Christmas day 1989. Their death sentence was carried
out after a brief trial by the new reformist leaders of the country, in
which they were found guilty of crimes against the Romanian people.
But despite that condemnation, and although the general
view as reflected in the CSOP survey results is that the communist
system as practiced in Romania was flawed, only a small minority of
those consulted in the poll (15%) said that former communist chief
Nicolae Ceauşescu was a bad leader.
Most respondents were neutral or undecided on this question, and 25%
said that Ceauşescu's leadership was good for the country.
In its analysis of the poll results, IICMER noted that
Romanians are far from alone in their generally positive evaluation of
20th Century communism. According to a survey carried out in several
Central and East European countries in 2009 by the U.S.-based Pew
Research Center, the proportion of people
in former socialist nations who take the view that life under
capitalism is worse than it was during the period of communist power is
as follows:
Poland: 35%
Czech Republic: 39%
Slovakia: 42%
Lithuania: 42%
Russia: 45%
Bulgaria: 62%
Ukraine: 62%
Hungary: 72%
Particulary significant in the results of the 2010 CSOP
/ IICMER poll in Romania is that, as they aquire more experience of
life under the 'market economy' people are becoming more negative about
capitalism and positive about communism. In the previous poll in 2006,
53% expressed a favourable
opinion about communism; the 2010 survey showed that 61% are favourable
towards communism.
The CSOP's survey findings are not altogether surprising
in view of what has taken place since capitalism was reintroduced --
increased poverty, the rise of unemployment and insecurity. Romania's
health system is currently in crisis, and public sector workers have
recently had their pay cut by 25%.
Second Annual International Conference on
Combatting Anti- Semitism
Playing the "Nazi Card" to Criminalize Dissent
From November 7-9 in
Ottawa, the Inter-parliamentary
Coalition for Combatting Antisemitism (ICCA) is holding its second
annual Conference on Combatting Anti-Semitism, hosted by the Canadian
Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) and the
Government of Canada. Prime Minister Stephen
Harper and Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Jason Kenney both
appeared and addressed the conference proceedings in their official
capacity as representatives of the Government of Canada. A press
release from Citizenship and Immigration Canada reported that
representatives from 45 countries were
participating.
The ICCA and the CPCCA are part of a scheme in service
of Anglo-American imperialism which attempts to criminalize conscience
by spuriously equating opposition to the racist ideology of Zionism
with anti-Jewish activity, or what is termed anti-semitism. The ICCA
came into being in February 2009,
comprised primarily of so-called western nations. It gives itself the
following mandate:
1. To promote awareness and understanding of the nature
and threat of anti-semitism;
2. To establish a reliable set of indicators of
anti-semitism for the purpose of better identifying, monitoring,
confronting and combating it;
3. To work with scholars of anti-semitism -- and the
leading scholarly institutions for the study of anti-semitism;
4. To utilize the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry Into
Anti-Semitism in the UK as a model template for other national
assemblies to follow;
5. To identify and develop a range of remedies to combat
anti-semitism;
6. To organize working groups around the indicators of
anti-semitism.
In a declaration issued at
its inaugural conference in
February 2009, the ICCA proposed many actions involving systematic
changes to national, European and international law to incorporate its
definition of anti-semitism, including through the
education/training of security forces.
This modus operandi of criminalizing
discussion of the state of Israel and seeking to outlaw opposition to
Israeli
Zionist crimes as being allegedly
"anti-semitism" and thus a "hate-crime" is exemplified in a 2009 report
entitled "Understanding
and Addressing the 'Nazi Card' -- Intervening
against Antisemitic Discourse," by Paul Igansky and Abe Sweiry. Igansky
and Sweiry accuse the entire solidarity front of playing "the Nazi
card" when Israel's crimes against the Palestinians are justly
identified with the Nazis' atrocities against European Jewry. While the
peoples of the world in the spirit of "Never
Again" consider the experience of European Jewry under the Nazi Reich
to belong to all of humanity, the authors consider it a sacrosanct and
singular Jewish event. The authors presume that all "good Europeans"
know that any reversion
to the Nazi era is not to be tolerated under any circumstances. Thus
they assert that anything those who defend
the Palestinians say or do is to not to be tolerated, especially if it
strays into
playing the "Nazi card."
The paper by Igansky and Sweiry
was published by the
European Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism (EISCA).
This institute was established in London in 2007 as the British
organizing centre for a "Eurocentric" response to the international
solidarity movements in the wake of the
failure of the joint EU-U.S.-Israel-led attempt to extinguish Hamas
following its unexpected victory over Fateh in the Palestine
Legislative Council elections of January 2006.
To get the EISCA off the ground, Oxford academic
Stephen Pollard worked closely with British MP Jim Murphy, then
Prime Minister Tony Blair's Minister for Europe, arranging for him to
deliver a major lecture on the topic of "countering anti-semitism" in
the British House of Commons. The
EISCA then took up popularizing this theme among a broad elite audience
within
British government circles.
Thus, the true mission of this Eurocentric "institute"
for the
subversion of contemporary anti-imperialism is the further
preparation of public opinion in the main countries of the
Anglo-American bloc to accept draconian measures for criminalizing the
movement in support of the Palestinian people as
the greatest danger to world peace and security since the Nazi scourges
of the Second World War. Indeed their "studies" and "lectures" spew
terminology that echoes, and is barely distinguishable from, the
rhetoric of Cold War anti-communism at its most rabid. It is no
coincidence that within such a framework the reactionary
ruling circles in Canada and elsewhere hope to ultimately criminalize
communism and support for communism on the basis that it preaches class
hatred and thus constitutes a hate crime.
The Zionists' 2006
war on Lebanon.
|
These attempts to criminalize opposition to
Zionism are based on several orders of disinformation. They cover up
that not only do many people of the Jewish faith not support Zionism
but that they actively oppose it. They also deliberately misconstrue
the
term anti-semitic to mean anti-Jewish, which
overlooks that Arab peoples are semites, nevermind that being Jewish
relates to certain cultural and religious practices that are not
exclusive to a particular race or ethnicity. Most perniciously, through
such false equivalencies, pro-Zionist forces attempt to shield the
Israeli state from being accused of war crimes by equating demands for
justice with being anti-Jewish and anti-semitic.
Thus, it is a sad irony that the only ones who can be
accused of playing the "Nazi card" are the Zionist forces. These are
the same forces who collaborated with the Nazis during World War II and
today shamelessly besmirch the memory of all those who died in the
fight against fascism.
TML denounces the Harper government for its
unrelenting support for the Zionists and their crimes and its attempts
to criminalize the right to conscience and dissent.
Read The Marxist-Leninist
Daily
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|