No. 32
May 15, 2026
78th Anniversary of the Nakba
May 15, 1948
• End the
Catastrophe Imposed on Palestinians Now!
Stand With Palestinian Resistance Until Liberation!
• Palestinians Mark 78th Anniversary of the Nakba
• Condemn Israel's
Escalation of Crimes Against
Palestinian Political Prisoners
For Your Information
• Brief History of
the Dispossession of Palestinian People
of Their Homeland by the Zionists
• The Infamy Called
"Canada Park": A Story of
Dispossession and Suffering
78th Anniversary of the Nakba
May 15, 1948
End the Catastrophe Imposed on
Palestinians Now!
Stand With Palestinian Resistance
Until Liberation!
Nakba Day protest, Toronto, May 17, 2025
CALENDAR
OF EVENTS
May 15 marks the 78th
anniversary of the Nakba -- the Catastrophe -- the mass
dispossession and displacement of the Palestinian people in 1948
by the Zionists with the backing of the Anglo-American
imperialists. Since then, for 78 years, brutal attempts continue
to remove the Palestinians from their homeland in which they
have lived for millennia.
This year's Nakba commemoration is taking place as the U.S. administration of Donald Trump continues to intervene in the U.S./Zionist genocide to entrench the U.S. in Palestine and the Middle East by demanding that control of Gaza be handed over to a U.S.-led colonial "Board of Peace." In the face of the brutal U.S. moves, along with those of its collaborators, the Resistance stands defiant and undaunted. The world's people continue to stand as one with the Resistance to demand an end to the U.S./Zionist genocide that is taking place and the right of the Palestinians to determine their own future themselves. The world's people also condemn the U.S./Israeli war on Iran and Lebanon and demand an end to Israel's crimes and that the U.S. get out of the Middle East.
Canadians and Quebeckers continue to demand that Canada stop supporting genocide in the name of Israel having the right to self-defence. This flies in the case of the fact that it is an occupying power and it is the Palestinians who have the right to oppose the occupation. They demand that Canada stop criminalizing those who support the Palestinian people and their Resistance under the hoax that they are "anti-Semites promoting hatred against Jews," and that Canada stop acting as a shield so U.S./Zionist forces can commit crimes with impunity and stop providing weapons to Israel.
The Zionists' stated aim for "Greater Israel" mandates
dispossession and genocide of the Palestinians and attacks on
neighbouring countries, such as Israel's occupation of Syria's
Golan Heights. The U.S. in practice backs this aim by arming the
Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) to the hilt to carry out these
crimes, especially the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and its
population of 2.3 million people, as well as refusing to take
concrete action to stop Israel's illegal settlements in the West
Bank, in which settlers and the IOF slaughter the people there
as well.
All of this makes clear that Israel intends to complete the Nakba started in 1948. At that time, Israel, supported by the British and U.S. governments, expelled some 750,000 Palestinians from their homes. The Israeli Zionist forces attacked 774 cities and villages and occupied 80 per cent of Palestinian soil after killing nearly 15,000 Muslim and Christian civilians. Those who survived were forcibly expelled to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. At least 250,000 were forced to leave Palestine entirely, ending up in Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 obligated Israel, as a condition of its founding, to guarantee the right of return of Palestinian refugees.
Israel has never abided by
any of the UN resolutions and the UN Security Council has never
held it to account. Today, the U.S. with its veto in the
Security Council, along with other countries that make up the
Genocide 7 (G7) cartel, including Canada, play a key role in
shielding Israel from being held to account by the UN.
In Canada, the Carney Liberal government continues its complicity in the genocide. For the last 31 months since October 2023, Canadians and Quebeckers have made clear that Canada's conniving in support of the U.S./Zionist genocide is unacceptable, and must be ended. Canada must answer for refusing to hold Israel to account.
In this situation, the steadfast role of the Palestinian Resistance Movements, in tandem with the resistance movements in Lebanon, Iran, Yemen and the sustained actions of the peoples of the world to block Israel's genocide, are making sure that the Zionist regime and U.S. imperialists and Genocide 7 cannot get away with their nefarious plans.
On the occasion of the 78th anniversary of the Nakba and the May 15 to 17 country-wide events, Canadians and Quebeckers continue to stand as one with the Palestinian people who are fighting for their right to be without once wavering. They also condemn the new U.S./Israeli Zionist laws that condemn Palestinian political prisoners to death by hanging as well as the relentless expansion of illegal settlements, all of which continue the dispossession of the Palestinians begun in 1948.
The Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) salutes the Palestinian people and their unrelenting resistance and stands with them and all the Resistance Movements as the struggle for liberation continues with renewed urgency.
CPC(M-L) condemns Canada's shameful role in supporting the U.S./Zionist genocide against the Palestinians by conciliating with the genocide and providing the Zionist apartheid state with tens of millions of dollars' worth of weapons and funds
All out to join the actions across Canada for the 78th anniversary of the Nakba! No! to Canada's support of the U.S./Zionist crimes against the Palestinian people! Not in our name! Arms embargo now!
Long Live the Palestinian Resistance!
Uphold the Palestinian People's Right of Return!
Palestinians Mark 78th Anniversary of the Nakba
Commemoration of Nakba 78 in Ramallah, May 12, 2026
On May 12, Palestinians in Gaza and the Occupied Territories held marches and rallies to mark the 78th anniversary of the Nakba (Catastrophe), their mass dispossession and displacement resulting from the founding of the Zionist state of Israel in 1948. They paid homage to the countless martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the cause of the liberation of Palestine.
The activities were organized by
the National Committee for the Commemoration of the Nakba, with
broad popular participation. The committee emphasized that the
events reaffirm Palestinians' commitment to their national
rights, foremost among them the right of return for refugees
displaced from 1948 to the present.
This year's commemorations took place in the context of the ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people and the most difficult conditions since the original Nakba in 1948 amidst the U.S./Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip. Politically, Zionist attacks include efforts to undermine the status of the Palestinian refugees and efforts to criminalize, defund and dismantle the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), which provides vital services that sustain millions of refugees across the region.
In the West Bank, thousands of people gathered in Ramallah at the mausoleum of Yasser Arafat, the late Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization and first President of the Palestinian Authority. In 1998, Yasser Arafat designated May 15 as Nakba Day as the day for the Palestinian people and the whole world to reflect on this historical wrong that must be addressed.
Participants then marched to Al-Manara Square, raising Palestinian flags and keys symbolizing their determination to exercise their right of return to their ancestral lands and properties. They heard speeches and also observed a 78-second moment of silence in memory of the martyrs in the struggle for Palestine's liberation. Other West Bank cities also held events marking the occasion, including Nablus, Tulkarm, Salfit and Tubas.
Commemorations are also taking place throughout Gaza, including the Khan Younis refugee camp.
Palestinians citizens of Israel also marked the occasion under the banner "Their Independence Day Is our Nakba," in spite of severe restrictions imposed by the Israeli state.
Across the world, people are gathering to put their weight behind the ongoing resistance of the Palestinian people. Palestinian communities outside of Palestine, which comprise half of the 15 million Palestinians in the world, are holding commemorative events commemorating Nakba Day -- in refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon and Syria and in Palestinian communities throughout the world, including in Canada.
Khan Younis
Nablus
Tulkarm
Hebron
(With files from Yemen News Agency, International Middle East Media Centre. Photos: Active Stills, Wafa.)
Condemn Israel's Escalation of Crimes Against Palestinian Political Prisoners
The Palestinian Resistance Movement Hamas is calling on the United Nations, the International Criminal Court and international human rights and humanitarian organizations to act urgently to stop Israel's plan to impose death sentences on those that it captured on October 7, 2023 during the Palestinian Resistance's Operation Al Aqsa Flood. They have been held by Israel without charge or trial since that time.
On May 11, the Israeli Knesset
passed the Prosecution for the Events of the Massacre on
October 7, 2023 Law, establishing a special military
court to try those captured on October 7, with full authority to
issue death sentences. The Israeli newspaper Yedioth
Ahronoth reported that "the law lays the legal foundation
for unprecedented trials -- the largest and most significant
held in Israel since the Eichmann Trial." The law was passed
with 93 members of the 120-member Knesset voting in favour.
Clearly, Israel has no qualms about its further descent into the
depths of depravity and inhumanity by holding such public show
trials that do not meet any acceptable standard and violate
human rights and international law. Its aims are not justice but
to extract vengeance, by carrying out mass executions based on
confessions extracted through torture.
Hamas denounced the law as a new crime against Palestinian prisoners which "reveals the vengeful and racist nature of the occupation system" and warned that it represents "a dangerous escalation and a new crime added to the occupation's record of war crimes and systematic violations against our people... The Israeli government seeks through this law to legalize the killing of prisoners and turn courts into tools of revenge and abuse." Hamas points out that by granting "exceptional powers" for military courts and permission to bypass rules of procedure and evidence, the law reflects Israel's departure from standards of justice and fair trials. This is "a flagrant violation of all international laws and conventions, foremost among them the Geneva Conventions and international humanitarian law," states Hamas. The law also explicitly excludes those detainees it targets from any potential future prisoner exchange agreements.
The mistreatment of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails is already well-known and decried the world over. Altogether there are presently more than 9,000 Palestinians detained in Israeli prisons, including women and children, where they face torture, starvation, sexual abuse and medical neglect. Of these only 1,254 have been charged and convicted and are serving sentences. At least 3,350 are being held indefinitely without charge under so-called administrative detention.
The latest law follows another passed in late March, the Death Penalty for Terrorists Law. Al Mayadeen reports that this law expands judicial authority to impose the death penalty, allowing judges "to issue death sentences without requiring a formal request from prosecutors. It also removes the requirement for unanimous judicial decisions, enabling a simple majority of judges to impose capital punishment.... The legislation further extends jurisdiction to military courts operating in the occupied West Bank, authorizing them to sentence Palestinian detainees to death. In such cases, the Israeli war minister would be permitted to present an opinion to the panel overseeing proceedings." United Nations Human Rights experts have condemned the law and called for its immediate repeal, noting that it is "a grave escalation in Israel's discriminatory oppression of Palestinians" and that "A death penalty regime that is discriminatory in purpose, design or effect is incompatible with the rights to life and equality before the law. [...] By reintroducing capital punishment in a system that targets solely Palestinians, despite Israel's prior abolition of the death penalty for murder and its long-standing de facto moratorium on executions, this law institutionalizes arbitrary and discriminatory deprivation of life."
The peoples of the world stand as one with the Palestinian people and their resistance and condemn this and all other efforts of the Zionist state to justify its genocide against the Palestinian people.
(With files from UN Human Rights Council, Al Mayadeen, NPR. Photo: Shehab)
For Your Information
Brief History of the Dispossession of Palestinian People of Their Homeland by the Zionists
Editor's Note: Some of the language which appears in the item titled "A Brief History of Palestine and Its People," compiled and published by Jews for Justice in the Middle East on August 11, 2009, is no longer used. The term Arab population of Palestine was used by the United Nations at the time of partition, rather than the correct use: Palestinian people. Today the Resistance Movement clearly recognizes that the resistance to occupation, ethnic cleansing and genocide is "not a conflict, not a war" but a struggle for national liberation and self-determination.
Also, while the Zionists and Genocide 7 continue to accuse the Resistance of all manner of crimes to justify an apartheid state, ethnic cleansing and genocide, today the right of the steadfast Palestinian people to resist until liberation is recognized and upheld by the peoples around the world without apology or recriminations of any kind.
***
Palestine, the mythic "land without people for a people without land" was already home to 700,000 Palestinians in 1919.
The standard Zionist position is that they showed up in Palestine in the late 19th century to reclaim their ancestral homeland. Jews bought land and started building up the Jewish community there. They were met with increasingly violent opposition from the Palestinian Arabs, presumably stemming from the Arabs' inherent anti-Semitism. The Zionists were then forced to defend themselves and, in one form or another, this same situation continues up to today.
The problem with this explanation is that it is simply not true.
Early History of the Region
Before the Hebrews first migrated there around 1800 BC, the land of Canaan was occupied by Canaanites.
"Between 3000 and 1100 BC, Canaanite civilization covered what is today Israel, the West Bank, Lebanon and much of Syria and Jordan...Those who remained in the Jerusalem hills after the Romans expelled the Jews [in the second century AD] were a potpourri: farmers and vineyard growers, pagans and converts to Christianity, descendants of the Arabs, Persians, Samaritans, Greeks and old Canaanite tribes." Marcia Kunstel and Joseph Albright, "Their Promised Land"
Present-day Palestinians' ancestral heritage
"But all these [different peoples who had come to Canaan] were additions, sprigs grafted onto the parent tree...And that parent tree was Canaanite...[The Arab invaders of the 7th century AD] made Moslem converts of the natives, settled down as residents, and intermarried with them, with the result that all are now so completely Arabized that we cannot tell where the Canaanites leave off and the Arabs begin." Illene Beatty, "Arab and Jew in the Land of Canaan."
The Jewish kingdoms were only one of many periods in ancient Palestine
"The extended kingdoms of David and Solomon, on which the Zionists base their territorial demands, endured for only about 73 years...Then it fell apart... [Even] if we allow independence to the entire life of the ancient Jewish kingdoms, from David's conquest of Canaan in 1000 BC to the wiping out of Judah in 586 BC, we arrive at [only] a 414 year Jewish rule." Illene Beatty, "Arab and Jew in the Land of Canaan."
More on Canaanite civilization
"Recent archeological digs have provided evidence that Jerusalem was a big and fortified city already in 1800 BCE...Findings show that the sophisticated water system heretofore attributed to the conquering Israelites pre-dated them by eight centuries and was even more sophisticated than imagined...Dr. Ronny Reich, who directed the excavation along with Eli Shuikrun, said the entire system was built as a single complex by Canaanites in the Middle Bronze Period, around 1800 BCE." The Jewish Bulletin, July 31, 1998
How long has Palestine been a specifically Arab country?
"Palestine became a predominately Arab and Islamic country by the end of the seventh century. Almost immediately thereafter its boundaries and its characteristics including its name in Arabic, Filastin became known to the entire Islamic world, as much for its fertility and beauty as for its religious significance... In 1516, Palestine became a province of the Ottoman Empire, but this made it no less fertile, no less Arab or Islamic... Sixty percent of the population was in agriculture; the balance was divided between townspeople and a relatively small nomadic group. All these people believed themselves to belong in a land called Palestine, despite their feelings that they were also members of a large Arab nation... Despite the steady arrival in Palestine of Jewish colonists after 1882, it is important to realize that not until the few weeks immediately preceding the establishment of Israel in the spring of 1948 was there ever anything other than a huge Arab majority. For example, the Jewish population in 1931 was 174,606 against a total of 1,033,314." Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."
How did land ownership traditionally work in Palestine and when did it change?
"[The Ottoman Land Code of 1858] required the registration in the name of individual owners of agricultural land, most of which had never previously been registered and which had formerly been treated according to traditional forms of land tenure, in the hill areas of Palestine generally masha'a, or communal usufruct. The new law meant that for the first time a peasant could be deprived not of title to his land, which he had rarely held before, but rather of the right to live on it, cultivate it and pass it on to his heirs, which had formerly been inalienable... Under the provisions of the 1858 law, communal rights of tenure were often ignored... Instead, members of the upper classes, adept at manipulating or circumventing the legal process, registered large areas of land as theirs...The fellahin [peasants] naturally considered the land to be theirs, and often discovered that they had ceased to be the legal owners only when the land was sold to Jewish settlers by an absentee landlord... Not only was the land being purchased; its Arab cultivators were being dispossessed and replaced by foreigners who had overt political objectives in Palestine." Rashid Khalidi, "Blaming The Victims," ed. Said and Hitchens
Arab opposition to the arrival of Zionists: inherent anti-Semitism or a real sense of danger to their right to be?
"The aim of the [Jewish National] Fund was 'to redeem the land of Palestine as the inalienable possession of the Jewish people.'... As early as 1891, Zionist leader Ahad Ha'am wrote that the Arabs "understood very well what we were doing and what we were aiming at'... [Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism], stated 'We shall try to spirit the penniless [Arab] population across the border by procuring employment for it in transit countries, while denying it employment in our own country... Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly'... At various locations in northern Palestine Arab farmers refused to move from land the Fund purchased from absentee owners, and the Turkish authorities, at the Fund's request, evicted them...The indigenous Jews of Palestine also reacted negatively to Zionism. They did not see the need for a Jewish state in Palestine and did not want to exacerbate relations with the Arabs." John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."
"Before the 20th century, most Jews in Palestine belonged to old Yishuv, or community, that had settled more for religious than for political reasons. There was little if any conflict between them and the Arab population. Tensions began after the first Zionist settlers arrived in the 1880's...when [they] purchased land from absentee Arab owners, leading to dispossession of the peasants who had cultivated it." Don Peretz, "The Arab-Israeli Dispute."
"[During the Middle Ages,] North Africa and the Arab Middle East became places of refuge and a haven for the persecuted Jews of Spain and elsewhere...In the Holy Land...they lived together in [relative] harmony, a harmony only disrupted when the Zionists began to claim that Palestine was the 'rightful' possession of the 'Jewish people' to the exclusion of its Moslem and Christian inhabitants." Sami Hadawi, "Bitter Harvest."
Proposals for Arab-Jewish Cooperation
"An article by Yitzhak Epstein, published in Hashiloah in 1907...called for a new Zionist policy towards the Arabs after 30 years of settlement activity...Like Ahad-Ha'am in 1891, Epstein claims that no good land is vacant, so Jewish settlement meant Arab dispossession...Epstein's solution to the problem, so that a new 'Jewish question' may be avoided, is the creation of a bi-national, non-exclusive program of settlement and development. Purchasing land should not involve the dispossession of poor sharecroppers. It should mean creating a joint farming community, where the Arabs will enjoy modern technology. Schools, hospitals and libraries should be non-exclusivist and education bilingual...The vision of non-exclusivist, peaceful cooperation to replace the practice of dispossession found few takers. Epstein was maligned and scorned for his faintheartedness." Israeli author Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, "Original Sins."
The British Mandate Period 1920-1948
Protest on the Centenary of the Balfour Declaration,
Mississauga, Ontario, November 4, 2017.
The Balfour Declaration promises a Jewish Homeland in Palestine.
"The Balfour Declaration,
made in November 1917 by the British Government...was made a) by
a European power, b) about a non-European territory, c) in flat
disregard of both the presence and wishes of the native majority
resident in that territory...[As Balfour himself wrote in 1919],
'The contradiction between the letter of the Covenant (the Anglo
French Declaration of 1918 promising the Arabs of the former
Ottoman colonies that as a reward for supporting the Allies they
could have their independence) is even more flagrant in the case
of the independent nation of Palestine than in that of the
independent nation of Syria. For in Palestine we do not propose
even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the
present inhabitants of the country...The four powers are
committed to Zionism and Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or
bad, is rooted in age-long tradition, in present needs, in
future hopes, of far profounder import than the desire and
prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient
land.'" Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."
The colonial outlook that Palestine was a wasteland before the Jews started immigrating there.
"Britain's high commissioner for Palestine, John Chancellor, recommended total suspension of Jewish immigration and land purchase to protect Arab agriculture. He said 'all cultivable land was occupied; that no cultivable land now in possession of the indigenous population could be sold to Jews without creating a class of landless Arab cultivators'...The Colonial Office rejected the recommendation." John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."
Were the early Zionists planning on living side by side with Arabs?
In 1919, the American King-Crane Commission spent six weeks in Syria and Palestine, interviewing delegations and reading petitions. Their report stated, "The commissioners began their study of Zionism with minds predisposed in its favor...The fact came out repeatedly in the Commission's conferences with Jewish representatives that the Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non- Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase...
"If [the principle of self-determination] is to rule, and so the wishes of Palestine's population are to be decisive as to what is to be done with Palestine, then it is to be remembered that the non-Jewish population of Palestine nearly nine-tenths of the whole are emphatically against the entire Zionist program... To subject a people so minded to unlimited Jewish immigration, and to steady financial and social pressure to surrender the land, would be a gross violation of the principle just quoted...No British officers, consulted by the Commissioners, believed that the Zionist program could be carried out except by force of arms. The officers generally thought that a force of not less than fifty thousand soldiers would be required even to initiate the program. That of itself is evidence of a strong sense of the injustice of the Zionist program...The initial claim, often submitted by Zionist representatives, that they have a 'right' to Palestine based on occupation of two thousand years ago, can barely be seriously considered." Quoted in "The Israel-Arab Reader" ed. Laquer and Rubin.
"Zionist land policy was incorporated in the Constitution of the Jewish Agency for Palestine...'land is to be acquired as Jewish property and..the title to the lands acquired is to be taken in the name of the Jewish National Fund, to the end that the same shall be held as the inalienable property of the Jewish people.' The provision goes to stipulate that 'the Agency shall promote agricultural colonization based on Jewish labor'...The effect of this Zionist colonization policy on the Arabs was that land acquired by Jews became extra-territorialized. It ceased to be land from which the Arabs could ever hope to gain any advantage...
"The Zionists made no secret of their intentions, for as early as 1921, Dr. Eder, a member of the Zionist Commission, boldly told the Court of Inquiry, 'there can be only one National Home in Palestine, and that a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish preponderance as soon as the numbers of the race are sufficiently increased.' He then asked that only Jews should be allowed to bear arms." Sami Hadawi, "Bitter Harvest."
Given Arab opposition to them, did the Zionists support steps towards majority rule in Palestine?
"Clearly, the last thing the Zionists really wanted was that all the inhabitants of Palestine should have an equal say in running the country...[Chaim] Weizmann had impressed on Churchill that representative government would have spelled the end of the [Jewish] National Home in Palestine...[Churchill declared], 'The present form of government will continue for many years. Step by step we shall develop representative institutions leading to full self-government, but our children's children will have passed away before that is accomplished.'" David Hirst, "The Gun and the Olive Branch."
Denial of the Arabs' right to self-determination
"Even if nobody lost their land, the [Zionist] program was unjust in principle because it denied majority political rights... Zionism, in principle, could not allow the natives to exercise their political rights because it would mean the end of the Zionist enterprise." Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, "Original Sins."
Didn't the Zionists legally buy much of the land before Israel was established?
"In 1948, at the moment that Israel declared itself a state, it legally owned a little more than 6 percent of the land of Palestine...After 1940, when the mandatory authority restricted Jewish land ownership to specific zones inside Palestine, there continued to be illegal buying (and selling) within the 65 percent of the total area restricted to Arabs.
Thus when the partition plan was announced in 1947 it included land held illegally by Jews, which was incorporated as a fait accompli inside the borders of the Jewish state. And after Israel announced its statehood, an impressive series of laws legally assimilated huge tracts of Arab land (whose proprietors had become refugees, and were pronounced 'absentee landlords' in order to expropriate their lands and prevent their return under any circumstances)." Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."
UN Partition of Palestine
Why did the UN recommend the plan partitioning Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state?
"By this time [November 1947] the United States had emerged as the most aggressive proponent of partition...The United States got the General Assembly to delay a vote 'to gain time to bring certain Latin American republics into line with its own views.'...Some delegates charged U.S. officials with 'diplomatic intimidation.' Without 'terrific pressure' from the United States on 'governments which cannot afford to risk American reprisals,' said an anonymous editorial writer, the resolution 'would never have passed.'" John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."
Why was this Truman's position?
"I am sorry gentlemen, but I have to answer to hundreds of thousands who are anxious for the success of Zionism. I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents." President Harry Truman, quoted in "Anti Zionism," ed. by Teikener, Abed-Rabbo & Mezvinsky.
Was the partition plan fair to both Arabs and Jews?
"Arab rejection was...based on the fact that, while the population of the Jewish state was to be [only half] Jewish with the Jews owning less than 10% of the Jewish state land area, the Jews were to be established as the ruling body a settlement which no self-respecting people would accept without protest, to say the least...The action of the United Nations conflicted with the basic principles for which the world organization was established, namely, to uphold the right of all peoples to self- determination. By denying the Palestine Arabs, who formed the two-thirds majority of the country, the right to decide for themselves, the United Nations had violated its own charter." Sami Hadawi, "Bitter Harvest."
Were the Zionists prepared to settle for the territory granted in the 1947 partition?
"While the Yishuv's leadership formally accepted the 1947 Partition Resolution, large sections of Israel's society including...Ben-Gurion were opposed to or extremely unhappy with partition and from early on viewed the war as an ideal opportunity to expand the new state's borders beyond the UN earmarked partition boundaries and at the expense of the Palestinians." Israeli historian, Benny Morris, in "Tikkun," March/April 1998.
The war begins
"In December 1947, the British announced that they would withdraw from Palestine by May 15, 1948. Palestinians in Jerusalem and Jaffa called a general strike against the partition. Fighting broke out in Jerusalem's streets almost immediately...Violent incidents mushroomed into all-out war...During that fateful April of 1948, eight out of thirteen major Zionist military attacks on Palestinians occurred in the territory granted to the Arab state." "Our Roots Are Still Alive" by the People Press Palestine Book Project.
Zionists' disrespect of partition boundaries
"Before the end of the mandate and, therefore before any possible intervention by Arab states, the Jews, taking advantage of their superior military preparation and organization, had occupied...most of the Arab cities in Palestine before May 15, 1948. Tiberias was occupied on April 19, 1948, Haifa on April 22, Jaffa on April 28, the Arab quarters in the New City of Jerusalem on April 30, Beisan on May 8, Safad on May 10 and Acre on May 14, 1948...In contrast, the Palestine Arabs did not seize any of the territories reserved for the Jewish state under the partition resolution." British author Henry Cattan, "Palestine, The Arabs and Israel."
Culpability for escalation of the fighting
"Menahem Begin, the Leader of the Irgun, tells how 'in Jerusalem, as elsewhere, we were the first to pass from the defensive to the offensive...Arabs began to flee in terror...Hagana was carrying out successful attacks on other fronts, while all the Jewish forces proceeded to advance through Haifa like a knife through butter'...The Israelis now allege that the Palestine war began with the entry of the Arab armies into Palestine after 15 May 1948. But that was the second phase of the war; they overlook the massacres, expulsions and dispossessions which took place prior to that date and which necessitated Arab states' intervention." Sami Hadawi, "Bitter Harvest."
The Deir Yassin Massacre of Palestinians by Jewish soldiers
"For the entire day of April 9, 1948, Irgun and LEHI soldiers carried out the slaughter in a cold and premeditated fashion...The attackers 'lined men, women and children up against the walls and shot them,'...The ruthlessness of the attack on Deir Yassin shocked Jewish and world opinion alike, drove fear and panic into the Arab population, and led to the flight of unarmed civilians from their homes all over the country." Israeli author Simha Flapan, "The Birth of Israel."
Was Deir Yassin the only act of its kind?
"By 1948, the Jew was not only able to 'defend himself' but to commit massive atrocities as well. Indeed, according to the former director of the Israeli army archives, 'in almost every village occupied by us during the War of Independence, acts were committed which are defined as war crimes, such as murders, massacres, and rapes'...Uri Milstein, the authoritative Israeli military historian of the 1948 war, goes one step further, maintaining that 'every skirmish ended in a massacre of Arabs.'" Norman Finkelstein, "Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict."
Statehood and Expulsion – 1948
Arab reaction to the announcement of the creation of the state of Israel
"The Arab League hastily called for its member countries to send regular army troops into Palestine. They were ordered to secure only the sections of Palestine given to the Arabs under the partition plan. But these regular armies were ill equipped and lacked any central command to coordinate their efforts...[Jordan's King Abdullah] promised [the Israelis and the British] that his troops, the Arab Legion, the only real fighting force among the Arab armies, would avoid fighting with Jewish settlements...Yet Western historians record this as the moment when the young state of Israel fought off 'the overwhelming hordes' of five Arab countries. In reality, the Israeli offensive against the Palestinians intensified." "Our Roots Are Still Alive," by the Peoples Press Palestine Book Project.
Ethnic cleansing of the Arab population of Palestine
"Joseph Weitz was the director of the Jewish National Land Fund...On December 19, 1940, he wrote: 'It must be clear that there is no room for both peoples in this country...The Zionist enterprise so far...has been fine and good in its own time, and could do with 'land buying' but this will not bring about the State of Israel; that must come all at once, in the manner of a Salvation (this is the secret of the Messianic idea); and there is no way besides transferring the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to transfer them all; except maybe for Bethlehem, Nazareth and Old Jerusalem, we must not leave a single village, not a single tribe'...There were literally hundreds of such statements made by Zionists." Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."
"Following the outbreak of 1936, no mainstream (Zionist) leader was able to conceive of future coexistence without a clear physical separation between the two peoples achievable only by transfer and expulsion. Publicly they all continued to speak of coexistence and to attribute the violence to a small minority of zealots and agitators. But this was merely a public pose...Ben Gurion summed up: 'With compulsory transfer we (would) have a vast area (for settlement)...I support compulsory transfer. I don't see anything immoral in it,'" Israel historian Benny Morris, "Righteous Victims."
"Ben-Gurion clearly wanted as few Arabs as possible to remain in the Jewish state. He hoped to see them flee. He said as much to his colleagues and aides in meetings in August, September and October [1948]. But no [general] expulsion policy was ever enunciated and Ben-Gurion always refrained from issuing clear or written expulsion orders; he preferred that his generals 'understand' what he wanted done. He wished to avoid going down in history as the 'great expeller' and he did not want the Israeli government to be implicated in a morally questionable policy...But while there was no 'expulsion policy', the July and October [1948] offensives were characterized by far more expulsions and, indeed, brutality towards Arab civilians than the first half of the war." Benny Morris, "The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949"
The Nakba of 1948
"Israeli propaganda has largely relinquished the claim that the Palestinian exodus of 1948 was 'self-inspired'. Official circles implicitly concede that the Arab population fled as a result of Israeli action whether directly, as in the case of Lydda and Ramleh, or indirectly, due to the panic that and similar actions (the Deir Yassin massacre) inspired in Arab population centers throughout Palestine. However, even though the historical record has been grudgingly set straight, the Israeli establishment still refused to accept moral or political responsibility for the refugee problem it – or its predecessors actively created." Peretz Kidron, quoted in "Blaming the Victims," ed. Said and Hitchens.
"The BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) monitored all Middle Eastern broadcasts throughout 1948. The records, and companion ones by a United States monitoring unit, can be seen at the British Museum. There was not a single order or appeal, or suggestion about evacuation from Palestine, from any Arab radio station, inside or outside Palestine, in 1948. There is a repeated monitored record of Arab appeals, even flat orders, to the civilians of Palestine to stay put." Erskine Childers, British researcher, quoted in Sami Hadawi, "Bitter Harvest."
"That Ben-Gurion's ultimate aim was to evacuate as much of the Arab population as possible from the Jewish state can hardly be doubted, if only from the variety of means he employed to achieve his purpose...most decisively, the destruction of whole villages and the eviction of their inhabitants...even [if] they had not participated in the war and had stayed in Israel hoping to live in peace and equality, as promised in the Declaration of Independence." Israeli author Simha Flapan, "The Birth of Israel."
The deliberate destruction of Arab villages to prevent return of Palestinians
"During May [1948] ideas about how to consolidate and give permanence to the Palestinian exile began to crystallize, and the destruction of villages was immediately perceived as a primary means of achieving this aim...[Even earlier] on 10 April, Haganah units took Abu Shusha... The village was destroyed that night... Khulda was leveled by Jewish bulldozers on 20 April... Abu Zureiq was completely demolished... Al Mansi and An Naghnaghiya, to the southeast, were also leveled...By mid-1949, the majority of [the 350 depopulated Arab villages] were either completely or partly in ruins and uninhabitable." Benny Morris, "The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949.
"The first UN General Assembly resolution – Number 194 – affirming the right of Palestinians to return to their homes and property, was passed on December 11, 1948. It has been repassed no less than twenty-eight times since that first date. Whereas the moral and political right of a person to return to his place of uninterrupted residence is acknowledged everywhere, Israel has negated the possibility of return...[and] systematically and juridically made it impossible, on any grounds whatever, for the Arab Palestinian to return, be compensated for his property, or live in Israel as a citizen equal before the law with a Jewish Israeli." Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."
The Right of Return
"The fact that the Arabs fled in terror, because of real fear of a repetition of the 1948 Zionist massacres, is no reason for denying them their homes, fields and livelihoods. Civilians caught in an area of military activity generally panic. But they have always been able to return to their homes when the danger subsides. Military conquest does not abolish private rights to property; nor does it entitle the victor to confiscate the homes, property and personal belongings of the noncombatant civilian population. The seizure of Arab property by the Israelis was an outrage." Sami Hadawi, "Bitter Harvest."
Negotiations after the 1948-1949 wars
"[At Lausanne, Switzerland] Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, and the Palestinians were trying to save by negotiations what they had lost in the war – a Palestinian state alongside Israel. Israel, however...[preferred] tenuous armistice agreements to a definite peace that would involve territorial concessions and the repatriation of even a token number of refugees. The refusal to recognize the Palestinians' right to self-determination and statehood proved over the years to be the main source of the turbulence, violence, and bloodshed that came to pass." Israeli author Simha Flapan, "The Birth of Israel."
"The [Lausanne] conference officially opened on 27 April 1949. On 12 May the [UN's] Palestine Conciliation Committee reaped its only success when it induced the parties to sign a joint protocol on the framework for a comprehensive peace. Israel for the first time accepted the principle of repatriation [of the Arab refugees] and the internationalization of Jerusalem, [but] they did so as a mere exercise in public relations aimed at strengthening Israel's international image...Walter Eytan, the head of the Israeli delegation, [stated]...'My main purpose was to begin to undermine the protocol of 12 May, which we had signed only under duress of our struggle for admission to the UN. Refusal to sign would...have immediately been reported to the Secretary-General and the various governments.'" Israeli historian Ilan Pappe, "The Making of the Arab-Israel Conflict, 1947-1951."
"The Preamble of this resolution of admission [to the UN] included a safeguarding clause as follows: 'Recalling its resolution of 29 November 1947 (on partition) and 11 December 1948 (on reparation and compensation), and taking note of the declarations and explanations made by the representative of the Government of Israel before the ad hoc Political Committee in respect of the implementation of the said resolutions, the General Assembly...decides to admit Israel into membership in the United Nations.'
"Here, it must be observed, is a condition and an undertaking to implement the resolutions mentioned. There was no question of such implementation being conditioned on the conclusion of peace on Israeli terms as the Israelis later claimed to justify their non-compliance." Sami Hadawi, "Bitter Harvest."
The fate of the Palestinians who had now become refugees
"The winter of 1949, the first winter of exile for more than seven hundred fifty thousand Palestinians, was cold and hard...Families huddled in caves, abandoned huts, or makeshift tents...Many of the starving were only miles away from their own vegetable gardens and orchards in occupied Palestine the new state of Israel...At the end of 1949 the United Nations finally acted. It set up the United Nations Relief and Works Administration (UNRWA) to take over sixty refugee camps from voluntary agencies. It managed to keep people alive, but only barely." "Our Roots Are Still Alive" by The Peoples Press Palestine Book Project.
The 1967 War and Israeli Occupation of West Bank and Gaza
The former Commander of the Air Force, General Ezer Weitzman, stated that there was "no threat of destruction" but that the attack on Egypt, Jordan and Syria was nevertheless justified so that Israel could "exist according the scale, spirit, and quality she now embodies."
Menahem Begin said: "In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian Army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him."
"I do not think Nasser wanted war. The two divisions he sent to The Sinai would not have been sufficient to launch an offensive war. He knew it and we knew it." Yitzhak Rabin, Israel's Chief of Staff in 1967, in Le Monde, February 28, 1968
"Moshe Dayan, the celebrated commander who, as Defense Minister in 1967, gave the order to conquer the Golan...[said] many of the firefights with the Syrians were deliberately provoked by Israel, and the kibbutz residents who pressed the Government to take the Golan Heights did so less for security than for the farmland...[Dayan stated] 'They didn't even try to hide their greed for the land...We would send a tractor to plow some area where it wasn't possible to do anything, in the demilitarized area, and knew in advance that the Syrians would start to shoot. If they didn't shoot, we would tell the tractor to advance further, until in the end the Syrians would get annoyed and shoot.
"And then we would use artillery and later the air force also, and that's how it was...The Syrians, on the fourth day of the war, were not a threat to us." The New York Times, May 11, 1997
The history of Israeli expansionism
"The main danger which Israel, as a 'Jewish state', poses to its own people, to other Jews and to its neighbors, is its ideologically motivated pursuit of territorial expansion and the inevitable series of wars resulting from this aim...No Zionist politician has ever repudiated Ben-Gurion's idea that Israeli policies must be based (within the limits of practical considerations) on the restoration of Biblical borders as the borders of the Jewish state." Israeli professor Israel Shahak, "Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3000 Years."
In Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharatt's personal diaries, there is an excerpt from May of 1955 in which he quotes Moshe Dayan as follows: "[Israel] must see the sword as the main, if not the only, instrument with which to keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension. Toward this end it may, no it must invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the method of provocation-and-revenge...And above all let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries, so that we may finally get rid of our troubles and acquire our space." Quoted in Livia Rokach, "Israel's Sacred Terrorism."
"In violation of international law, [in the 1967 war] Israel has confiscated over 52 percent of the land in the West Bank and 30 percent of the Gaza Strip for military use or for settlement by Jewish civilians...From 1967 to 1982, Israel's military government demolished 1,338 Palestinian homes on the West Bank. Over this period, more than 300,000 Palestinians were detained without trial for various periods by Israeli security forces." Intifada: The Palestinian Uprising Against Israeli Occupation," ed. Lockman and Beinin.
"Under the UN Charter there can lawfully be no territorial gains from war, even by a state acting in self-defense. The response of other states to Israel's occupation shows a virtually unanimous opinion that even if Israel's action was defensive, its retention of the West Bank and Gaza Strip was not...The [UN] General Assembly characterized Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza as a denial of self determination and hence a 'serious and increasing threat to international peace and security.'" John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."
"A study of students at Bethlehem University reported by the Coordinating Committee of International NGOs in Jerusalem showed that many families frequently go five days a week without running water...The study goes further to report that, 'water quotas restrict usage by Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza, while Israeli settlers have almost unlimited amounts.'
"A summer trip to a Jewish settlement on the edge of the Judean desert less than five miles from Bethlehem confirmed this water inequity for us. While Bethlehemites were buying water from tank trucks at highly inflated rates, the lawns were green in the settlement. Sprinklers were going at mid day in the hot August sunshine. Sounds of children swimming in the outdoor pool added to the unreality." Betty Jane Bailey in "The Link," December 1996.
"You have to remember that 90 percent of children two years old or more have experienced some many, many times the [Israeli] army breaking into the home, beating relatives, destroying things. Many were beaten themselves, had bones broken, were shot, tear gassed, or had these things happen to siblings and neighbors...The emotional aspect of the child is affected by the [lack of] security. He needs to feel safe. We see the consequences later if he does not. In our research, we have found that children who are exposed to trauma tend to be more extreme in their behaviors and, later, in their political beliefs." Dr Samir Quota, director of research for the Gaza Community Mental Health Programme, quoted in "The Journal of Palestine Studies," Summer 1996, p.84
"There is nothing quite like the misery one feels listening to a 35-year-old [Palestinian] man who worked fifteen years as an illegal day laborer in Israel in order to save up money to build a house for his family only to be shocked one day upon returning from work to find that the house and all that was in it had been flattened by an Israeli bulldozer. When I asked why this was done – the land, after all, was his – I was told that a paper given to him the next day by an Israeli soldier stated that he had built the structure without a license. Where else in the world are people required to have a license (always denied them) to build on their own property? Jews can build, but never Palestinians. This is apartheid." Edward Said in "The Nation" May 4, 1998.
All Jewish settlements in territories occupied in the 1967 war are a direct violation of the Geneva Conventions, which Israel has signed.
"The Geneva Convention requires an occupying power to change the existing order as little as possible during its tenure. One aspect of this obligation is that it must leave the territory to the people it finds there. It may not bring its own people to populate the territory. This prohibition is found in the convention's Article 49, which states, 'The occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.'" John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."
Excerpts from the U.S. State Department's reports during the Intifada
"Following are some excerpts from the U.S. State Department's Country Reports on Human Rights Practices from 1988 to 1991:
"1988: 'Many avoidable deaths and injuries' were caused because Israeli soldiers frequently used gunfire in situations that did not present mortal danger to troops...IDF troops used clubs to break limbs and beat Palestinians who were not directly involved in disturbances or resisting arrest... At least thirteen Palestinians have been reported to have died from beatings...'
"1989: Human rights groups charged that the plainclothes security personnel acted as death squads who killed Palestinian activists without warning, after they had surrendered, or after they had been subdued...
"1991:[The report] added that the human rights groups had published 'detailed credible reports of torture, abuse and mistreatment of Palestinian detainees in prisons and detention centers." Former Congressman Paul Findley, "Deliberate Deceptions."
Jerusalem Eternal, Indivisible Capital of Israel
"Writing in The Jerusalem Report (Feb. 28, 2000), Leslie Susser points out that the current boundaries were drawn after the Six-Day War. Responsibility for drawing those lines fell to Central Command Chief Rehavan Ze'evi. The line he drew 'took in not only the five square kilometers of Arab East Jerusalem but also 65 square kilometers of surrounding open country and villages, most of which never had any municipal link to Jerusalem. Overnight they became part of Israel's eternal and indivisible capital.'" Allan Brownfield in The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, May 2000.
The record of Israeli state terrorism
"However much one laments and even wishes somehow to atone for the loss of life and suffering visited upon innocents because of Palestinian violence, there is still the need, I think, also to say that no national movement has been so unfairly penalized, defamed, and subjected to disproportionate retaliation for its sins as has the Palestinian.
"The Israeli policy of punitive counterattacks (or state terrorism) seems to be to try to kill anywhere from 50 to 100 Arabs for every Jewish fatality. The devastation of Lebanese refugee camps, hospitals, schools, mosques, churches, and orphanages; the summary arrests, deportations, house destructions, maimings, and torture of Palestinians on the West Bank and Gaza..these, and the number of Palestinian fatalities, the scale of material loss, the physical, political and psychological deprivations, have tremendously exceeded the damage done by Palestinians to Israelis." Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."
"It is simply extraordinary and without precedent that Israel's history, its record from the fact that it...is a state built on conquest, that it has invaded surrounding countries, bombed and destroyed at will, to the fact that it currently occupies Lebanese, Syrian, and Palestinian territory against international law is simply never cited, never subjected to scrutiny in the U.S. media or in official discourse...never addressed as playing any role at all in provoking 'Islamic terror.'" Edward Said in "The Progressive." May 30, 1996.
The Infamy Called "Canada Park": A Story of Dispossession and Suffering
Canada Park is a national park built on top
of three ethnically cleansed Palestinian villages.
I was born, in 1933, in the village of Beit Nuba in Palestine, where I was brought up and lived happily with family and friends. The village of Beit Nuba had existed for thousands of years, as historic records show. However, Israeli wars of aggression and war crimes made its recent history painful and tragic.
In May 1948, the Israeli army launched an attack to occupy the villages of Imwas [Emmaus], Yalu and Beit Nuba, but failed to conquer these villages. Elsewhere, in Palestine, the Zionist terrorist gangs and the Israeli army were committing massacres against the predominantly unarmed Palestinian people and conducted their long-planned campaign of ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people from their homeland. There was one day, out of many during that conflict, that left painful sights in my life. It was on July 10, 1948 that Israeli army troops, led by Yitzhak Rabin, occupied the Palestinian cities of Lydda and Ramleh. Rabin and his officers proceeded to drive these 50-60,000 civilian inhabitants of these two cities away from their homes in terror, with low-flying airplanes over their heads shooting the occasional person and forcing them to run. The sight of the terror-stricken, hungry and thirsty men, women and children fleeing in terror in the midday sun of the hot summer, having run approximately twenty-five kilometres to the village of Beit Nuba, where I, a 15 year old boy, saw them with my own eyes, is a sight not to be forgotten.
The defeat of the Israeli army and its failure to occupy these three villages, in May 1948, brought about a brutal revenge 19 years later in the war of aggression that Israel planned and effected on June 5, 1967 against its Arab neighbours. On June 6, these three villages were occupied, without a single shot being fired, and were systematically dynamited and bulldozed, on the direct orders of Yitzhak Rabin, the then chief of staff of the Israeli army. The villagers, over 10,000, were expelled from their land. In the village of Beit Nuba, 18 were buried alive under the ruins of their homes because they were old or infirm and unable to move out of their homes before they were demolished. One of them, Mohammad Ali Baker, was an uncle of my mother. When our home was demolished, my uncle, who was old and arthritic, was slow to move out, the Israeli soldiers told him, while they were demolishing the western part of our home, that he will be buried alive if he did not move when they will be soon demolishing the eastern part of our home. He was hurriedly moved out. The pain and suffering that my mother sustained was immense and continued to feel until her dying day. My mother, brother, sisters and my uncle were driven out from our land and never allowed to return, and I continue to bear that pain.
Imwas in 1968 after being razed by the
Zionists.
In 1967, Palestinians were expelled from
Imwas by the Israeli military, which bulldozed their homes.
The destruction of these three villages in June 1967 was described, in the CBC documentary below, as an act of revenge, by General Narkiss the commander of the Israeli forces that demolished these villages.
The destruction of these villages was witnessed and described by the Israeli journalist Amos Kenan, who was a reserve soldier in the occupying force in Beit Nuba. He gave this account to the Israeli newspaper Ha'Olam Hazeh, which was prohibited by the censor from publishing it. It was sent to all members of the Knesset, and to the Israeli Prime Minister and Defence Minister, but no response was received.
"The unit commander told us that it had been decided to blow up three villages in our sector; they were Beit Nuba, Imwas and Yalu ... We were told to block the entrances of the villages and prevent inhabitants [from] returning .... The order was to shoot over their heads and tell them not to enter the village.
"Beit Nuba is built of fine quarry stones; some of the houses are magnificent. Every house is surrounded by an orchard, olive trees, apricots, vines and cypresses. They are well kept. Among the trees, there are carefully tended vegetable beds.
"At noon the first bulldozer arrived and pulled down the first house at the edge of the village. Within ten minutes the house was turned into rubble. The olive trees and cypresses were all uprooted. After the destruction of three houses, the first refugee column arrived from the direction of Ramallah. We did not fire in the air. There were old people who could hardly walk, murmuring old women, mothers carrying babies, small children. The children wept and asked for water. They all carried white flags.
"We told them to go to Beit Sira. They told us they had been driven out. They had been wandering like this for four days, without food, some dying on the road. They asked to return to their village ... Some had a goat, a lamb, a donkey or a camel. A father ground wheat by hand to feed his four children .... The children cried. Some of our soldiers started crying too.
"We went to fetch the Arabs some water. We stopped a car with a major, two captains and a woman ... We asked the officers why these refugees were sent from one place to another and driven out of everywhere. They told us that this was good for them, they should go. 'Moreover,' said the officers, 'what do we care about the Arabs anyway?'"
"We drove them out. They go on wandering like lost cattle. The weak die. Our unit was outraged. The refugees gnashed their teeth when they saw the bulldozers pull down the trees. None of us understood how Jews could behave like this. No one understood why these fellaheen [villagers] shouldn't be allowed to take blankets and some food.
"The chickens and doves were buried in the rubble. The fields were turned into wasteland in front of our eyes. The children who went crying on the road will be fedayeen in nineteen years, in the next round. Thus we have lost the victory." (From Israel Imperial News, March 1968.)
Uri Avnery, then a Knesset member, described the destruction of these villages as a definite war crime. This was carried out on the direct orders of Yitzhak Rabin, then Chief of Staff of Israel's armed forces. These acts are in direct violation of The Fourth Geneva Convention, 1949, to which Israel is a signatory. Article 53 of the convention states: " Any destruction by the Occupying Power of real or personal property, belonging individually or collectively to private persons, or to the state, or to other public authorities or social or cooperative organizations, is prohibited."
It is now difficult to spot the ruins and the rubble. Today there stands on the site of the ruins of these three village, Imwas [the biblical village Emmaus, where Jesus Christ first appeared after his Resurrection to meet with his Apostles], Yalu and Beit Nuba, the infamy called "Canada Park", with picnic areas for Israelis, built with Canadian tax-deductible dollars provided by the Canadian Jewish National Fund (JNF), a registered Canadian charity. [TML emphasis]
It was in 1973 that Bernard Bloomfield of Montreal, then President of the JNF of Canada, spearheaded a campaign among the Canadian Jewish community to raise $15 million to establish Canada Park, so as to provide a picnic area accessible to Israelis from Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.
At the entrance of Canada Park, just off John Diefenbaker Parkway (opened by Diefenbaker himself in 1975), is a sign that reads: "Welcome to Canada Park in Ayalon Valley – a project of the Jewish National Fund of Canada."
The JNF, responsible for the upkeep of the park, has removed all signs of the villages and their inhabitants from the area. It would seem that only the Canadian donors are worthy of being remembered; their names are engraved in the bronze plaques which cover an entire wall. Interestingly, these donors are not directly informed that the park is built on the site of the demolished villages. The Director of the American JNF stated that, "It is a delicate situation, and one cannot expect an institution [such as the Canadian JNF] which gathers money from abroad, to publicise the issue [of the demolition of these villages]." ("Canada Park: A Case Study," by Ehud Meltz and Michal Selah, Kol Hair, Aug. 31, 1984.)
The glossy guidebook, published by the JNF of Canada, has an entire page devoted to the history of the area, including the biblical, Roman, Crusader and British periods, but has no mention of these villages or their destruction. Another step in the obliteration of the villages from memory can be seen in their absence from Israeli maps.
As a new Canadian, my personal pain was compounded when I read on Dec. 4, 1978, in our local newspaper, The Halifax Herald, that Peter Herschorn, a prominent Halifax businessman and past chairman of the Atlantic branch of the JNF, was honored by the JNF for his humanitarian work and "choosing the right goodness" in his participation in the building of Canada Park. The Lieutenant-Governor of Nova Scotia, the Premier of NS and the Mayor of Halifax were in attendance and offered their greetings. I was mortified that political leaders in my new country, Canada, would consider the erection of recreation centres on the site of ruins of criminally demolished peaceful villages, illegally occupied, as a humanitarian act.
When I was invited to come to Canada to teach at Dalhousie University Medical School, I accepted with enthusiasm, as I had a vision of Canada as a country of liberal values upholding human rights and international law. However, the story of our government, allowing our tax dollars to be used to build this infamy of Canada Park, a war crime, has been a source of torment and pain for me. Over many years, I have written repeatedly, supported by some honourable politicians like Senator Heath Macquarrie and Mr. R.A. Corbett, MP, to successive Revenue Canada Ministers, expressing concern about this, and receiving only vague unhelpful answers. It was in the midst of this that the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Fifth Estate program prepared and broadcast a documentary on Canada Park, titled: "Park with no Peace," broadcast on Oct. 21, 1991. This deserves to be viewed and studied by all.
In summation, I stand before you today, to express gratitude to the Canadian Museum for Human Rights for agreeing to listen to my story exposing the violation of my human rights and to express the pain and suffering of the Palestinian people who were systematically expelled from their homeland and continue to live as refugees denied the fundamental right of return to their homes, a right clearly stipulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and repeated UN resolutions. As Israel continues to defy international law and to compound our agony, we witness deafening silence from countries, like Canada, which claim to uphold the UN Charter and universal human rights. To compound that, I, as a Canadian citizen, feel, with pain and shame, the complicity of my country in continuing to subsidize this war crime, sadly called Canada Park, defaming Canada's name.
Canada Park – "Park with No Peace"
(To access articles individually click on the black headline.)
Website: www.cpcml.ca Email: editor@cpcml.ca