February 1, 2018
Need for Decision-Making Power
Workers' Fight to Determine Working
Conditions Themselves
PDF
Need for Decision-Making Power
• Workers' Fight to Determine Working
Conditions Themselves
Third Week of Lockout
at ABI Smelter in Bécancour, Quebec
• Workers Firmly Declare, "The ABI Conflict Is
Not a Private Matter"
Nova Scotia
• Social Workers Step Up Fight to Determine
Working Conditions and Increase Investments in Social Programs
• Public Sector Workers' Defence of Their
Rights and
the Rights of All
Toronto
• Campbell Soup to Shut Down Canadian
Manufacturing Plant -
Janice Murray
Prince George
• University of Northern BC Food Service
Workers Rally for Better Wages and Working Conditions
Need for Decision-Making Power
Workers' Fight to Determine
Working Conditions Themselves
Workers in every sphere of
the economy are striving to be the key factor in determining their
working conditions, which is their right. Social workers, teachers,
nurses, construction workers, food service workers and workers in every
place of work know the conditions in which they work; they know what is
necessary to carry out their work
properly, be it safety measures, staffing levels, tools, training,
instruments, knowledge and so on. They know what their claim should be
on the value they create to have a Canadian standard of living and
security in retirement. They know how their work is part of the overall
interconnected economy as a whole. If the socialized economy is to
function without crises and unleash its full potential, their
particular sector must work together in conformity with all other
sectors and parts, respecting and treasuring the work of one and all.
One of the biggest frauds today is found in how the
modern economy is organized, in particular the relations between those
who do the work and those who do not. Workers do the work modern
society demands and produce all the value contained in goods and
services, while others, be they management, owners, or government
politicians and
bureaucrats make the decisions, determine the conditions and direction
of the work, what happens to the social product that workers create,
how the value is distributed, generally imposing a narrow will and aim
which favours those who have taken possession of all the wealth created
by society. This arrangement blocks those who do the work and
require conscious collective participation in making decisions which
affect their lives. This must be put at the very centre of modern life,
which is the workplace. No modern country can declare itself democratic
while this upside-down state of affairs continues.
Third Week of Lockout at ABI Smelter
in Bécancour, Quebec
Workers Firmly Declare, "The ABI Conflict
Is Not a Private Matter"
The 1,030 workers at the Aluminerie de
Bécancour Inc. (ABI) smelter have now been locked out since
January 11 by the Alcoa and Rio Tinto monopolies who are the joint
owners. As soon as the workers were locked out, the union representing
them, United Steelworkers Local 9700, denounced this odious
gesture
that serves a hidden agenda. The
union contacted the Minister of Labour and asked that the government
intervene to bring the owners back to the bargaining table and
negotiate in good faith a collective agreement acceptable to the
workers. The minister replied that this is a "private dispute" in which
the government cannot intervene.
Workers strongly reject this statement and ask for
government
intervention. During their visit to the picket lines of ABI workers on
January 25, workers of the Alma Aluminum Workers' Union, USW Local
9490, who were also locked out for six
months by Rio Tinto in 2012, strongly stated
that the conflict is not a "private conflict" between a company and a
local union, as the Minister claims.
"We brought with us our mobilization trailer that we
used in 2012 and we decorated it with the colors of ABI workers for
them to use it too," said President of Local 9490 Alexandre
Fréchette. "We brought it to draw attention to the conflict.
Why? Because the impact of the conflict is more than just 1,000 workers
taken hostage, it is their families, their community and it's a whole
region, the subcontractors, the suppliers, a lot of people who depend
on the ABI aluminum smelter who are taken hostage. There is a political
dimension too. We are demanding to know from the government what is
happening? They must answer to the people whether or not Alcoa and Rio
Tinto are negotiating with the government on energy issues, if they are
asking for lower rates. They must answer because it concerns all
Quebeckers. It is not true that it is a private conflict between a
private company and the union. The energy rebates given to aluminum
smelters are an issue for the people of Quebec who foot the bill
because we are the ones subsidizing it. We have our say in this; we
must be aware of it and support the workers so that the conflict ends
in the shortest possible time."
To the applause of everyone, Fréchette announced
that
Alma's union
will provide $15,000 a week in financial assistance until the end
of
the conflict.
The next day, the Quebec director of the United
Steelworkers, Alain
Croteau, who also came to support ABI workers on their picket line,
reiterated the remarks of the Alma workers saying, "We find ourselves
in front of two multinationals that receive significant benefits in the
form of very low electricity rates and who are taking the people as
hostages. The lockout ultimately has little to do with
labour-management bargaining. Workers are paying the price for
shenanigans to raise aluminum prices and lower electricity rates. The
Quebec government cannot stand idly by. The resources belong to us as
Quebeckers and the government must remember that it represents us. We
are the ones who vote the government into office, not Alcoa. Premier
Couillard needs to talk to the company executives and have them sit
down at the bargaining table so that we can have a negotiated contract,
not one that is being imposed as they are trying to do right now."
Croteau was joined by United Steelworkers' Canadian
director Ken
Neumann, who pledged to mobilize all locals to support the ABI workers.
He was also accompanied by two Los Mineros union representatives from
Mexico who brought greetings from Mexico's miners.
Nova Scotia
Social Workers Step Up Fight to Determine
Working Conditions and Increase
Investments in Social Programs
Social Workers in Nova Scotia recently sent a letter to
the Minister of Community Services and built a website to express their
views and continue their fight to have a say over their working
conditions. The website is called changeDCS.org.
This group of workers work under Policy 75,
meaning they are Private Practitioners. They have close working
relationships with public Nova Scotia social workers and firsthand
experience with the conditions of work under the Department of
Community Services (DCS). They have chosen to speak out on behalf of
vulnerable clients and
public social workers who may fear potential retaliatory actions if
they raise their concerns regarding the conditions of children in
public care.
Workers' Forum
stands with Nova Scotia social workers and supports their just stand to
raise their concerns with the conditions of work and the implications
these conditions have on the most vulnerable people in Nova Scotia.
Their concerns should be a basis for broad discussion amongst the
people.
The letter to the Minister of Community Services is
posted below.
***
Dear Minister Regan,
The undersigned social workers, most of us involved in
the provision of counselling services for clients of the Department of
Community Services, Child Protection section, are writing to express
our serious concern regarding the current service delivery and
significant stressors in DCS Child Protection.
The following three areas appear to us to reflect
problems we have observed in our involvement with DCS-Child Protection
colleagues and clients over the past year:
1. Difficulties with regard to human resource management;
2. Systemic impact resulting from new legislation on
DCS-CP and Dept. of Justice (including silos between provincial
agencies and the federal government); and
3. Children and family care planning.
These are particular examples of the issues noted
above:
- high caseloads which are challenging the quality of
case management and increasing risk to vulnerable children and families
- dramatic increases due to a variety of possible
reasons, in absences or turnover of staff
- significant difficulty reaching workers to discuss
service delivery
- lack of departmental direction and policy to improve
culturally competent DCS service delivery to clients, and/or children,
of African Nova Scotian descent
- despite some changes, there continues to be evidence
of chaos in the arrangement of visitation for families, resulting in
already traumatized persons losing low wage work time, and sometimes
losing jobs
- reduction in salary of case aides
- impact of the passage of new legislation which
effectively shortens time lines for child protection matters before the
court, resulting in increased pressures on families, legal aid lawyers
and child protection colleagues
- passage of new legislation without the corresponding
increase in the resources necessary to meet its requirements
- insufficient administrative support for front line
social workers, requiring them to spend unreasonable amounts of time in
paperwork, administrative tasks, and requiring them to function as
resource organizers rather than social workers focused on case
management and direct service delivery
- lack of essential coordination between DCS and
Revenue Canada to address the enormous gap in timeline for the return
of the Child Tax Credit for very poor families -- at their time of
greatest need after meeting the requirement for return of children to
their care.
- social workers not wanting to speak out for fear of
potential disciplinary action, and clients fearing to speak out from
concern that their matters with child protection will be negatively
impacted
While we are not ourselves front line child welfare
social workers, and recognize the limitations of not being inside the
DCS, we are sufficiently involved, with considerable experience, to be
able to comment on our observations with credibility. We ask that our
concerns be heard, and that serious consideration be given to the
implications for
vulnerable families.
Please respond at your earliest convenience with an
opportunity for us to meet with senior staff.
Sincerely,
Lanna MacLean (Dartmouth),
Jackie Barkley (Halifax),Beth Toomey (Sydney), Debbie Reimer
(Kentville), Ian "Tay" Landry (Dartmouth), Marlene Furey (Halifax), Pam
Roberts (Halifax), Roger Godin (Halifax), Elizabeth Shein (Halifax),
Diane Nickerson (Pubnico), Marie Meagher (Antigonish), Robert Wright
(Halifax), Annemieke Vink
(Dartmouth), Cheryl Thompson (Hansport), Marion Sheridan (Antigonish),
Marjorie MacDonald (Sydney), Donna Fitzpatrick (Amherst), Andrea Boyce
(Sackville), Ken Osbourne (Halifax)
Public Sector Workers' Defence of Their Rights
and the Rights of All
Demonstration outside opening of Nova Scotia legislature, September 21,
2017,
against the
August 22 passage of Bill 148.
The anti-democratic attack on workers' rights was on
full display in Nova Scotia when the McNeil Liberal government imposed
its dictate on teachers, nurses and all other public sector workers
with the passing of Bill 148, the Public Services
Sustainability Act on August 22, 2017. McNeil, despite
interventions
by thousands of Nova Scotians including teachers, students, counsellors
and countless others, refused to increase investments in education or
make any of the changes and improvements brought forward and demanded
by the people, and instead rammed his anti-social austerity dictate
down the throats of all.
The deteriorating conditions in the schools presented
with full evidence, statistics and recommendations by professionals,
fell on deaf ears. Teachers and education workers have refused to
accept the McNeil government's dictate using Bill 75 to impose wages
and working conditions on them and attacking students learning
conditions. Teachers have since launched a court challenge to the
legislation and continue to challenge the government's schemes to go
further in attacking education using a new "review." More and more
working people in Nova Scotia are recognizing that they must say No! to the current direction and
find a way to stop the anti-social trend.
Social Workers Join Other Public Sector Workers
Demanding a New Direction
Social workers, particularly in Child Protection, have
come forward to demand changes in their working conditions. Nova Scotia
Government and General Employees Union (NSGEU) President Jason MacLean
in a press
release last October 11 said, "Child Protection Social Workers are
responsible for assessing and protecting the safety and well-being of
kids in need. They need a manageable workload so they have the
time and resources to make the right decision for vulnerable children
and families."
Earlier, in May of 2017, the NSGEU sent a letter to the
McNeil Liberal government outlining difficulties social workers face
because of specific conditions of work relating to:
- caseload management,
- staff levels,
- safety of social workers,
- safety of children in their care,
- and their ability to meet the Standard of Care required as outlined
in the new Children's and Family Services Act (2017).
The NSGEU stated in their letter, "We have collected a
number of constructive suggestions for improving our members' working
conditions and consequently the service they provide."
Instead of congratulating social workers for their
dedication to the well-being of the youth and giving them the resources
and green light to make the desired improvements, the province
responded with the empty words of detached bureaucrats, "The Department
is open to meeting and discussing the impact of the important
transformation work that is underway within [the Department of
Community Services (DCS)] which is focused on ensuring that children
and their families receive the best service possible.... The Department
of Community Services shares the commitment to ensuring that the social
workers who provide front line support to children and youth in the
care of the Minister have the appropriate tools and conditions within
which to carry out their important duties."
The words are from the McNeil Liberal playbook of
spouting sweet nothings and policy objectives to deprive workers, be
they teachers, social workers or others, of their right to decide and
take action to solve problems. A proverb to avoid solving problems
because it does not fit the anti-austerity agenda of the ruling elite
springs to mind -- the
road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Deeds Not Words!
The working people of Nova Scotia are not questioning
the good intentions of McNeil or the bureaucrats of the DCS. Such
questioning of words and intentions is futile indeed and working people
have long come to understand this truth. They are questioning their
deeds! They are questioning why those who do not do the work make the
decisions for those who do the work. This backward way has become
entrenched all across Canada and is a major reason why problems are
never solved and the modern economy cannot be mobilized to its full
potential to guarantee the rights of all and the general interests of
society.
Governments of the ruling
elite at all levels across Canada are well versed in saying certain
things to be elected or stay elected. They ensure their political
parties and words dominate the mass media using money, social
connections and the archaic electoral rules that promote and fund
cartel political parties and not the electoral process, which
should guarantee the right of all to elect and be elected with an
informed vote. The avalanche of words, good intentions and policy
objectives are meant to cover their anti-social deeds and the reality
that they have done nothing concrete to resolve any problems facing the
people.
How long will Nova Scotia be a have-not province,
without a vigorous all-sided self-reliant economy that unleashes the
tremendous potential of the people and resources? How many more years
will child poverty be a problem for which the austerity warriors cry
crocodile tears and spout sympathetic yet empty words? How many more
years
will the education system be in chaos? How many more years will social
workers face increasing workloads and problems for their safety and the
safety of children in their care? How many more years will workers be
blocked from exercising their right to decide and to build the new?
The Way Forward
A most pressing issue for the working class of Nova
Scotia as well as elsewhere in Canada and Quebec is to step up its
efforts to affirm workers' right to make the decisions concerning their
conditions of work. Time and again, those who do the work come up
against a government or some other institution, enterprise or governing
body with an anti-social agenda serving narrow private interests that
negates workers' right to decide and blocks them from solving problems.
By discussing and acting as a collective to end the state of affairs
that keeps them sidelined and marginalized from making the decisions
that concern their working conditions and other affairs that affect
their lives and the general interests of society, working people are
affirming not only their own rights but the rights of all.
Join the Discussion and Collective Force
to Build the New!
Toronto
Campbell Soup to Shut Down
Canadian Manufacturing Plant
- Janice Murray -
The Campbell Soup Company announced on January 24,
its
intention to stop production of soup in Canada within the next 18
months. The closure of its only Canadian manufacturing facility,
located in Etobicoke, Ontario will put 380 workers out of a job.
This act
of nation-wrecking, through the destruction of a perfectly good
production facility which is part of the Canadian food manufacturing
sector, was crassly presented as "the best course of action for our
business" as if the decision was a private one with no broad impact on
the social economy and people and their food security.
For working people in the Etobicoke-Lakeshore district
of Toronto, this is the latest in a long string of nation-wrecking
plant closures and demolitions dating back to the introduction of the
free-trade agreement with the U.S. in 1988. At that time the area
was one of the most highly industrialized in Toronto, with large plants
such as
Goodyear Tire and Rubber, Anaconda Brass, Continental Can and many more
employing thousands of industrial workers producing huge amounts of new
value for the Canadian economy. Since then, one by one, plants have
closed and shifted operations to the U.S. or elsewhere. During the
recession of 2007-09, ArvinMeritor, an auto parts
plant and Consumers Glass, among others, closed down, followed more
recently by Mr. Christie's Bakery.
The people of Etobicoke,
alongside workers across the country, have voiced their strong
opposition to the neo-liberal free trade agreement during and following
the 1988 election. They had growing concerns about the neo-liberal
direction of the economy and the destruction it would rain down on the
economy and their lives. As more
and more plants closed down and moved out of the area, workers
expressed their alarm and concern, participating in forums and
exchanges on how to develop the "local economy" and stop the wrecking.
The problem which working people faced then and now is that
they have no say or control over these major decisions which have
severe
consequences on their lives and socialized economy.
In response to the announced closure of the Campbell
Soup factory, the local city councillor called it a "devastating loss"
and a "truly sad day for the Lakeshore community." This may reflect
many people's immediate sentiments, but what is needed -- from
municipal, provincial or federal politicians -- is that they take a
stand against such
nation-wrecking and not simply wring their hands impotently from the
sidelines.
In addition to other considerations, Campbell's
installed a Combined Heat and Power Plant in 2016, which
generates 95 per cent of the electricity required to power the
plant through a natural-gas fuelled engine that also produces steam for
food processing. The project -- referred to as a co-generation project
-- was billed at the
time as an important step towards energy efficiency and sustainability.
The company received $5 million in incentives from Ontario
Hydro, 40 per cent of the total value of the system's installation
-- money that comes out of the added-value Ontario workers produce.
At the time of the Campbell Soup co-generation project
start
up, the Ontario Liberal Minister of Energy Bob Chiarelli said, "From a
business perspective, it just makes sense -- saving energy means saving
money and keeping good jobs in Ontario." Yet less than two years later,
the company is to be allowed to walk away scot free, and to destroy, as
their private property the upgraded plant, a precious asset of the
Canadian economy. The local Liberal MPP, who was present for the
photo-op at the start-up of the publicly-funded co-generation project,
has had nothing to say about the social responsibilities of the company
to his constituency or to the Ontario economy since the announced plant
closure.
Such a state of affairs is unconscionable. It may be
Campbell Soup's legal prerogative to no longer operate a production
facility in Canada and leave the country, but a solution is needed to
carry on local food and other production in Canada. Why should Campbell
Soup, or Heinz or any of the other companies that have shuttered
production in Canada, be allowed to carry out such nation-wrecking and
then be free to sell commodities from its U.S. plants into the Canadian
market? This problem requires discussion and a solution.
The Etobicoke plant may be the "smallest and oldest" in
Campbell Soup's empire but it forms part of a whole network of
social arrangements within the food industry and social economy in
Canada. In addition to the livelihoods of workers at the plant,
Campbell's purchases approximately 70 per cent of its produce from
farms
within a 3.5 hour drive of the Toronto plant. It purchases
some 4,800 tonnes of carrots annually from growers in the Holland
Marsh area north of Toronto, for whom the loss of these sales will
create serious problems, not to mention the transportation and
distribution sector that will be affected. At present, farm producers
have not
negotiated contracts for this year's crop.
In terms of the Lakeshore neighbourhood itself, the
Company currently provides food to both the Daily Bread Food Bank,
whose warehouse is less than a block from the plant, and to Second
Street School. This
neighbourhood has some of the poorest postal codes in the Greater
Toronto Area. The Campbell's plant also supplies other Canadian food
banks.
The problems faced by working people in Etobicoke, as
elsewhere in the country, lie with the narrow direction of the economy
that serves the rich and their insatiable greed at the expense of the
working people. The added-value workers produce must flow back into the
economy for its extended reproduction and constant renewal, and into
society to meet its general interests. The global monopolies absconding
with added-value Canadian workers produce rather than reinvesting it
back into the economy should rightly be considered theft which must be
stopped. To wreck production
and have the assets Canadian workers have built sit idle or be
destroyed, without any effort at renewing the facilities or proposing
an
alternative in the community, is a sign of the necessity for change
towards a nation-building project under the control of working people.
The irrational situation of nation-wrecking under the control of these
global monopolies, serving their narrow private interests, exposes the
lack of control Canadian working people have over their own economy
and fate. This must change!
It's Time to Change the Direction of the
Economy from Enriching the Few
to
Serving the Working People, Those Who Produce the Social Wealth!
For Your Information: Campbell Soup Company
The Campbell Soup Company plant in Etobicoke has been
in operation since 1931, 87 years, at the present location.
The Etobicoke plant is Campbell's only plant in Canada
and currently employs just under 600 people full-time. The average
age of those working at the plant is 46. Of these,
approximately 200 -- who are part of the Canadian headquarters and
commercial operations -- will relocate from the Etobicoke plant to
another GTA
location, which is to include a "food innovation Centre."
Campbell's closed down its plant in Listowel, Ontario
in 2009, putting 500 workers out of a job. The plant was the
largest employer in the town of 6,500, which is 40 km
northwest of Kitchener.
The company employs 18,500 people worldwide. It
has plants in Maxton, North Carolina; Napoleon, Ohio; Paris, Texas;
Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and Everett, Washington. Production from the
Canadian plant is being transferred to the North Carolina, Ohio and
Texas plants -- where the company says it has excess capacity so will
not be
increasing its workforce significantly. Campbell Soup Company also has
a plant in Australia and one in Germany.
Campbell Soup is a U.S. company headquartered in
Camden,
New York and listed on the stock exchange. It ranks 337 on the
Fortune 500 list of biggest industrial corporations. Its yearly
sales are approximately $8 billion. The company owns a number of
other brands including Pepperidge Farm, Goldfish, V8, Prego, Pace,
Plum Organics, Bolthouse Farms, and in 2017 purchased
Snyder's-Lance and Pacific Foods.
Prince George
University of Northern BC Food Service Workers
Rally for Better Wages and Working Conditions
Students, faculty, staff and community members joined
together on January 24, in a rally to support the University of
Northern BC (UNBC) food service workers from Unite Here Local 40
who are fighting for a new contract. Several of those participating in
the rally have been shocked to learn that many of the workers preparing
and serving food at UNBC for more than a decade, make less than
$15/hour and have no pension.
Union representative,
Harley Augustino and several cafeteria workers spoke of the
unacceptable situation they face in terms of current wages and working
conditions, and their efforts to obtain a contract agreeable to
themselves. They noted that after eight months of bargaining the
company has come back with an insulting wage offer. There
is some irony in all of this as UNBC proudly announces that it has been
named one of BC's best employers. Yet the administration with nary a
protest allows the Compass Group multinational to impose such poor
wages and working conditions on those who provide the university such a
necessary and important service.
Aaron Eckman, secretary-treasurer of the BC Federation
of Labour, was the first guest speaker and began by praising the
workers for their collective determination and struggle to win a
contract they can accept with dignity. In the course of his
presentation, he pledged support from thousands of workers across the
province, and highlighted the
need for UNBC to stand up for its contracted employees. He pointed out
that in their fight to raise their standard of living, the workers are
helping the local economy and this should be acknowledged.
Peter Ewart, spokesperson for the Stand Up for the
North
Committee, noted that the Compass Group -- the contractor for food
services at UNBC -- is the largest food service company in the world
located in 50 countries with tens of billions of dollars in
revenue every
year including billions in profits. He said the cafeteria workers are
doing
exactly what is necessary to end poverty wages and improve working
conditions, by mobilizing themselves and working with others at the
university and in the broader community to demand a contract acceptable
to themselves.
The final speaker was Dawn
Hemingway, representing Northern FIRE: The Feminist Institute for
Research and Evaluation at UNBC. She spoke about research and community
work of the Institute that underlines the significant negative impact
of precarious and underpaid employment on the health and wellbeing of
workers and their
families. She praised the strength and determination of the workers and
called on the university administration to come forward in support of
the rights and demands of their contracted workers.
Among other organizations represented at the rally were
the Canadian Union of Public Employees, the UNBC Faculty Association,
Prince George Public Research Interest Group, Northern Women's Centre
and BC Government and Service Employees Union.
Responding to UNBC's failure to date to engage with the
workers, including refusal (on two occasions) to accept petitions
circulated by the workers calling on the university to stand with them,
rally participants decided to march to the President's Office and ask
for a meeting. After being told the President was out of town, workers
asked if he
could be brought in by phone but to no avail. A phone call was then
made to the Vice President Academic and Provost to request a meeting
with him. After some time and negotiation, it was agreed that a
delegation and one media representative could meet with three UNBC
Vice Presidents.
The impact of that meeting is yet to be seen but
several things are clear: support for the workers' just demands is
growing on campus and in the broader community, and the food service
workers are determined to fight until they receive an acceptable
contract.
PREVIOUS
ISSUES | HOME
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: office@cpcml.ca
|