|
June 29, 2012 - No. 99
British Columbia Jobs Plan
In Contempt of Nation-Building
British
Columbia
Jobs
Plan
• In Contempt of Nation-Building
• "Canada Starts Here" -- Six Month
Anti-Social, Anti-Worker, Nation-Wrecking Progress Report -
Barbara Biley
• Who the Jobs Plan and Its Privatization of
Electricity Serve - Charles Boylan
Manufacturing Yes!
Nation-Wrecking No!
• Flavelle Sawmill Closure in Port Moody, BC
- Brian
Sproule
• Aveos Workers Fight for their Livelihoods and
Against Dismantling of Aircraft Maintenance Sector - Pierre
Chénier
Announcement
• Notice to Our Readers
British Columbia Jobs Plan
In Contempt of Nation-Building
The BC Jobs Plan with its emphasis on
exporting raw material corresponds with other plans across Canada such
as Plan Nord in Quebec, the Ring of Fire in Northern Ontario and the
exporting of raw bitumen from Alberta's oil sands some of which is
proposed to flow through a mostly BC pipeline
to the west coast.
All of these plans are in
contempt of nation-building. They are based on the rapid extraction and
export of
Canada's rich storehouse of natural resources to Asia, the United
States and elsewhere for the benefit of a privileged minority. The
similarity in substance amongst these plans makes for a
conclusion that the North American monopolies, the ruling oligarchs,
through their "think tanks" and other planning mechanisms, have
dictated their projects through governments, which far from defending
public interest represent an executive committee of the richest most
powerful international finance capitalists.
They view Canada's resources and people not as a solid
base on which to build a nation with a vibrant self-reliant diverse
economy but as a colonial outpost of resources and ready labour to
extract resources as quickly and cheaply as possible to benefit distant
owners of capital. Having exhausted the resources
and despoiled the land, the monopolies desert to other regions of the
world without having built anything lasting and secure.
Their aim is to rob Canadian
resources at maximum speed
and profit while wrecking manufacturing and destroying Canadian social
programs and public services and without due consideration of the
natural environment. These self-serving billionaires who control the
North American monopolies want to maximize
their profits and eliminate any notion of Canadian sovereignty or
democratic empowerment of the actual producers who transform the bounty
of Mother Earth into useable products and services. They see Canada as
10 million square kilometres of land mass full of resources and with
labour at their beck and call. They
do not see a country and people aspiring to guarantee the rights of all
within a nation-building project of their own making. Such a
nation-building project aims for the empowerment of the people,
livelihoods for all, maximum education, health care, old age security
and other social programs and public services financed
through a self-reliant diverse economy based on manufacturing and
agriculture dedicated to providing individual and collective security
and a bright future.

"Canada Starts Here" -- Six Month Anti-Social,
Anti-Worker, Nation-Wrecking Progress Report
- Barbara Biley -
In September 2011, BC Premier Christy Clark announced
her government's "plan to create long-term jobs and investment in our
province." Entitled Canada Starts
Here with the subtitle The BC
Jobs
Plan, the document was released amidst a great deal of marketing
fanfare and photo-ops with mining, forestry
and other workers, particularly in Northern BC.
The Premier, in a quote
that prefaces the Plan on the
government website, calls on British Columbians to join her in "telling
the world, Canada Starts Here." The first paragraph of the Plan says
that British Columbians have "both the opportunity and obligation to
lead our country across the ocean and secure our
place in the emerging economies of the Asia Pacific."
In contrast to the bombast, a rational approach to
addressing problems in the development of the economy to better meet
the material, cultural and social needs of the workers, fishers,
farmers, small business owners, youth, seniors and every other section
of the working people would be to engage everyone in
discussion about the way forward for the province and the obstacles to
progress. The discussion would identify the problems the people face in
securing their rights and place here at home not in the "Asia Pacific."
No such discussion has taken place because the aim of
the Premier and the Liberal Party in power has nothing to do with
addressing problems facing the people and developing the economy to
meet the needs of British Columbians. The aim has everything to do with
eliminating obstacles for the rich to realize
greater and greater profit through the exploitation of the resources of
the province and the labour of the workers.
It is very cynical to call this a BC Jobs Plan for at
best the jobs to be created are insecure and relatively short-term
until the resources are exhausted or not needed by those abroad.
The plan is to increase the exploitation of immigrant
workers and, along with the new EI and temporary foreign worker
measures contained in Bill C-38, the omnibus budget bill, recently
bullied through Parliament by
the Harper government, a plan to drive down wages and working
conditions for all. The Harper government's omnibus Bill C-38 also
permits the devastation of the natural environment by foreign
monopolies for which regulations are being abandoned so that at the end
of their plunder they will have filled their pockets and left, while
the damage to the environment will remain for us to repair.
The Canada Starts Here plan has "three
pillars" directed towards what are called eight sectors of the economy.
The three pillars are 1) Working with employers and communities to
enable job creation across the province; 2) Strengthening our
infrastructure to get our goods to market; and 3) Expanding
markets for BC products and services, particularly in Asia.
The eight "sectors" are Forestry, Mining, Natural Gas,
Agrifoods, Tourism, Transportation, International Education and
Technology.
The "Six Month Progress Report" refers to the Premier's
first of two trade missions to "lead our country across the ocean." The
first was the "BC Jobs and Trade Mission to China and India" last
November which is said to have been the largest international
delegation in BC history, with government officials
joined by "250 delegates representing 150 BC companies, organizations
and community groups." Sixty business deals and partnership agreements
were signed in six sectors -- transportation, seafood, liquefied
natural gas, mining, post-secondary education and forestry. The second
expedition to Japan, Korea and the
Philippines in the spring is not included in the report.
The Six Month Progress Report highlights measures taken
to attract more foreign investment, including tax incentives, "clearing
unnecessary and bureaucratic red tape," which the Premier says has
resulted in the approval of permits for four mines to extend operations
and efforts to reduce the backlog of mining
permits by 80 per cent by August 31, 2012.
In October 2011, the first federal license ever granted
for liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports was approved for Kitimat where
Royal
Dutch Shell, Korea Gas Corp, Mitsubishi and China National Petroleum
Corp have purchased a marine terminal as a possible site for an LNG
export terminal. The stated goal of the Canada Starts Here
plan is to have three LNG
facilities by 2020. A Major Investments Office has been established to
work with investors proposing large projects and measures are being
taken to develop education programs to meet the needs of these
investors for trained workers, as well as to target
immigration and temporary foreign workers.
To supply labour to the resource monopolies the Liberal
government under Gordon Campbell created the Industry Training
Authority Act in 2003 as an employer controlled apprenticeship
training program. This replaced the former apprenticeship program
established by the Industry Training
and Apprenticeship
Commission Act. Private monopolies control the Industry Training
Authority (ITA) but the public
treasury supplies the funds. In the last year alone, the BC government
handed over more than $100 million to the ITA, along with $31 million
as an "apprenticeship training tax credit program" for employers.
The Plan also promises to facilitate the monopolies'
removal of raw resources from BC with government financed
infrastructure upgrades and expansions to seaports and airports.
Every measure outlined in
the Six Month Progress Report
is aimed at satisfying the demands of the monopolies for unfettered
access to the natural resources of the province -- tax incentives,
infrastructure improvements providing roads, ports and rail lines, the
training of workers and importation of temporary
foreign workers without rights, government subsidies for projects,
faster and easier approval of mine expansions, new mines and other
projects etc.
The Clark government contends jobs are collateral
compensation bestowed on workers by "investors." This reveals how far
removed the actual producers are from controlling their economy and its
direction, and how incoherent the existing institutions and
arrangements have become.
The real power lies with the monopolies and the
politicization of their private interests. Clark says, "Prudent fiscal
management has made BC a safe harbour for investors and business, and,
when combined with other economic and educational advantages, a secure
one."
The working class and First Nations cannot allow
themselves and the public interest to be dismissed so easily from the
considerations of the future of the province. BC has to become a "safe
harbour" for those who reside here and call this place home. This
requires a
new direction for the economy decided by the people
and under their control.

Who the Jobs Plan and Its Privatization of
Electricity Serve
- Charles Boylan -
The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) has
released a 41-page document Clean Electricity, Conservation and
Climate Justice in BC by John Calvert and Marc Lee. The work
analyzes how BC residents will pay for the cornerstone natural gas and
mining projects of the Liberal government's BC Jobs Plan.
BC Hydro electricity
is sold to those ventures below its price of production. Other hydro
ratepayers especially households and small businesses throughout the
province are then forced to pay for electricity above its price of
production.
John Calvert, an associate-professor at Simon Fraser
University in Burnaby, also authored Liquid Gold: Energy
Privatization in BC, which sharply criticized the private power
program of former Premier Gordon Campbell's government. The BC Liberals
politicized
the private interests of "run-of-river" power projects
forcing BC Hydro to sign long-term guaranteed contracts to buy their
private power at exorbitant rates well above BC Hydro prices.
Marc Lee, a Senior Economist with the CCPA, is
Co-Director of the Climate Justice Project. Their joint CCPA study of
the "BC Jobs Plan" analyzes how residents subsidize the privatized
power projects and wealthy corporations that extract BC natural gas and
various mineral resources for export to Asia and
the United States.
The BC working class has a big stake in being
well-informed about the "Jobs Plan." Government and corporate hype
plays on
the notion that pay-the-rich schemes are necessary to attract and
encourage "investors" in the natural gas and mining sectors to provide
livelihoods for British Columbian workers. The
analysis reveals how few livelihoods are created as both the mining of
industrial minerals and the extraction and liquefying of natural gas
are centred on exporting raw material and not on manufacturing and the
creation of a self-reliant diverse economy with vibrant communities
throughout the province. The emphasis
of the BC Jobs Plan on exporting raw material is similar to other
neoliberal plans across Canada such as Plan Nord in Quebec, the Ring of
Fire in Northern Ontario and the exporting of raw bitumen from
Alberta's oil sands.
The research in the Calvert/Lee publication exposes the
audacity of the financial oligarchs to both steal BC's resources and
maximize their rate of profit by having British Columbians pay a good
piece of their costs of production. The report finds amongst other
facts:
"Natural gas and mining corporations are putting
increasingly large demands on our electricity system -- using clean,
low-carbon electricity for the expansion of dirty, carbon-intensive
industries. In the absence of significant policy changes, British
Columbians will end up subsidizing industrial power use through
steep rate increases....
"The three major components of BC's current economic
development strategy -- mines, natural gas projects, and liquefied
natural gas (LNG) plants -- are very energy intensive. As new
electricity is far more expensive than existing supply, this will raise
the overall price of electricity for all ratepayers. Much larger
electricity loads plus major investments in new high-voltage
transmission lines built specifically for industry add little long-term
value to BC's electricity system.
"A key finding of this report is that British Columbians
are subsidizing mining, oil and gas companies through BC Hydro. Under
the current electricity tariff, all ratepayers share the costs of new
electricity even if BC Hydro acquires it for one specific class of
ratepayers. Consequently, residential and commercial
customers will face rate increases to fill the gap...."[1]
The
authors
cite
examples.
The
developers
of
the
Montney
shale
gas
region, a large area covering northeastern BC and
northwestern Alberta, will be charged less than half the price of
production
of the electricity BC Hydro will provide them, a subsidy of about $150
million per year during peak production,
a loss that will be made up by raising electricity rates for BC
households and commercial users.
Investors in natural resource extraction put a
proportionately larger amount of capital into machinery, equipment and
energy costs compared to the number of workers actually engaged in
creating new value. This puts downward pressure on the rate of profit,
unless the export price of the commodity is higher than
their price of production.
To raise the rate of profit, the gas and mining
monopolies,
through their private interests having political clout in the
legislature which dictates BC Hydro's policies and other measures, are
able to buy electricity at a cost below the price of production and are
provided subsidies from the public treasury and other
political benefits.
The mass of BC residents, by paying high prices for
electricity, subsidize the low electricity price paid by the natural
gas
exporters. A lower cost of electricity, which is a major cost of
production, raises the gas export monopolies' rate of profit.
Another form of subsidy is the provision of
infrastructure. BC Hydro is upgrading its transmission line in the
region at a cost of $255 million. This line is needed only for the
Montney shale gas development. When the gas is extracted, in perhaps 20
years, the lines will serve no function, as no large communities
exist in the region, nor will the extraction of gas give rise to any,
as vibrant and lasting local communities are not part of their
anti-national plan, which can be characterized as extraction and
desertion without using the resource as a seed to build anything
lasting and vibrant, especially manufacturing.
Yet another example is a BC Hydro subsidy of about $125
million a year to provide cheaper than price of production electricity
to run the proposed LNG plant in Kitimat. Liquification of natural gas
requires huge amounts of electricity. Several more such liquification
plants are part of the BC jobs plan.
A BC Hydro Northwest Transmission line projected to cost
$561 million is being built specifically for several new mines and
private power projects in that region.

Click to enlarge.
|
Further north and east the report states, "BC Hydro is
planning a $1.5 to $2 billion Northeast transmission line to service
shale gas developments in the Horn River basin near Fort Nelson."
The authors point out that providing subsidized
electricity rates and infrastructure to these monopolies, BC Hydro
undermines any motivation for them to conserve electricity. In the end,
it will be BC households and small and medium-sized businesses that pay
the
bill.
A second major feature of the huge price increases to be
passed on to BC households and small and medium-sized business
electricity users in coming years is the outrageously high prices BC
Hydro has been compelled to pay by the former Campbell Liberal
government for Independent Power Producers' (IPP)
privately-owned electricity production.
"In 2006, BC Hydro paid $87.50 per MWh for new supply.
By 2009, the average price had risen to $124 per MWh," the report
states. "According to the 2011 BC Hydro Review, private power projects
supplied 16% of BC's total domestic electricity requirements, but
accounted for 49% of overall domestic energy
costs."
All told BC Hydro has been forced by government dictated
policy to agree to a "total of $40 billion in long term contracts to
purchase private power at unreasonably high prices."
From paying $290 million for private power contracts,
the projected bill for 2014 will reach $1.1 billion.
The Clark Liberal government repeats the mantra that all
the new investment in BC to extract and export natural resources is
"about jobs." The truth is just the opposite. The resource extraction
industries as they are now constituted provide very few jobs, and do
not enhance communities. They are based on extraction
at the lowest cost and highest profit and then desertion. They are not
based on nation-building.
The loss of dozens of saw mills and pulp mills due in
part to the increased export of raw logs especially from coastal
communities forms part of this same mania to export raw material as
quickly as possible without considering the long-term consequences of
such destructive practices. The layoffs of those mill
workers have exceeded any employment gained from gas extraction, mining
and LNG.
The report notes: "The BC government justifies its
resource export strategy by pointing to the very large investments that
resource projects pump into BC's economy. For example, in its September
2011 'Jobs Plan' the government points to the large investments in new
mines and other resource projects as key
components of its overall economic development strategy. However, the
Jobs Plan ignores the fact that these sectors are extremely capital
intensive, and employ few British Columbians. In 2008, mining and oil
and gas combined employed 28,100 workers, about 1.2% of total
provincial employment."
The "Jobs Plan" reality contrasts sharply with the fact
that in 2011 there were 183,400 officially unemployed in BC or 7.5
per cent of the workforce. Even if employment had doubled from 2008 to
2011 in the mining, oil and gas industries, there would have still been
155,300 unemployed workers in the province.
The Calvert/Lee analysis of what is taking place with BC
Hydro is revealing for the working class. The "Jobs Plan" is really a
plan to lead the province into impoverishment and ruin. By charging
resource extraction monopolies a fraction of what BC Hydro has to pay
for electricity from private producers, and
considering BC Hydro's own price of production and costs of new
infrastructure, the public enterprise is assuming an ever greater debt
imposed on it by the politicization of the private interests of the
resource monopolies and private power companies. This public debt
becomes part of the excuse for cutbacks to social
programs and public services and increased individual taxation and user
fees.
The Calvert/Lee research paper makes clear that the
Liberal government, as the direct tool of finance capital investors in
resource extraction ventures and private power, is an instrument to
politicize the private interests of the monopolies. This points to the
necessity for a new direction for political and economic
affairs of the province.
Note
1. Quoted from
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publ
ications/BC%20Office/2012/06/CCPA-BC-Clean-Electricity.pdf

Manufacturing Yes! Nation-Wrecking No!
Flavelle Sawmill
Closure
in Port Moody, BC
- Brian Sproule -
Flavelle Sawmill in Port Moody, which produced lumber
and cedar products such as siding and panelling, has been shut down.
The company's parent company, Mill and Timber Products claims that,
"Soaring insurance premiums in the wake of two fatal sawmill explosions
in the BC interior caused the closure."
The company says its annual insurance premium has jumped from $300,000
to just over one million dollars.
In the wake of the April 23 explosion at Lakeland Mills
sawmill in Prince George that killed two workers and injured 22,
WorkSafe BC ordered all mills in the province to inspect their premises
for dust build-up. The mass media jumped to the conclusion that dust
from dry pine beetle infected trees was the cause
of the explosions and that all mills in the province were in danger and
insurance rates would soar. Little consideration was given to a process
where governments would hold companies to account to improve mill
safety standards and no mills would be held ransom by insurance
companies. Even less consideration
was given to the fact that the working class is quite capable of
building and enforcing a safe working environment if given the control.
Why would workers want to work in an unsafe site, given a chance for
control over conditions?

Aerial view of the
Flavelle Sawmill.
|
At any rate, sources report that the conditions at the
Flavelle Sawmill are not similar to the interior mills and a blanket
judgement for insurance purposes should not apply. Logs processed at
Flavelle are stored in water. Many ask how insurance companies come to
their conclusions on rates and why they have
such power over the industry. Did the insurance company do a full
inspection of the Flavelle Mill along with WorkSafe BC before
determining the rate and follow that inspection up with regular
unannounced visits to inspect for dust and other hazards? Apparently
not. This anti-conscious hysteria surrounding the
forest industry is not an acceptable way to manage it.
However, other forces behind this wrecking of
manufacturing may be at play at the Flavelle Mill and elsewhere. Port
Moody Mayor Mike Clay, while lamenting the fact that the closure will
severely affect the city's tax base, revealed that parent-owner Mill
and Timber Products' long-term plan does not include
a prosperous value-producing mill but to "develop" the waterfront
property with a hotel, condominiums and marina. Mr. Clay also revealed
that discussions on the future of the mill site have been going on for
many years.
Port Moody is part of Greater Vancouver and appears to
be caught in the stranglehold of big real estate development capital,
which has little by little destroyed the city's manufacturing base and
much of its agriculture. Port Moody became the western terminus of the
Canadian Pacific railway in 1886. The first
sawmill was established there in 1905. Over the next few decades, a
string of mills, factories, oil refineries and port facilities such as
Pacific Coast Terminals, the largest sulfur port in the world, were
located along the eastern shores of Burrard Inlet in areas that were
not directly in the rich agricultural regions of
the nearby Fraser Valley.
In the last twenty years, Port Moody has been largely
de-industrialized while real estate and road construction has spread
even into the Fraser Valley agricultural regions. The IOCO (ESSO)
refinery closed in 1995. Andre's winery closed in 2005. The Burrard
Thermal (natural gas) Generating Station is now used
by BC Hydro only as an emergency backup.
Successive Canadian governments have overseen the
destruction of manufacturing including in BC. In contrast to the
wrecking of manufacturing, real estate development and speculation in
the Lower Mainland has exploded, even taking over prime agricultural
land. Combined with this has been the ever increasing
production and exporting of raw mineral and forestry commodities such
as raw logs.
BC workers are discussing
this problem in the context of
developing their own agenda for nation-building. The current wrecking
of manufacturing and food security is not sustainable and an
alternative must be worked out and fought for with practical politics.
A modern economy cannot sustain its requirements
for social programs, full employment, infrastructure and public
services without a nation-building project that has manufacturing as
its basic creator of value and food security as an essential aspect.
This means self-reliance in manufacturing and food security is key,
with other elements of the economy such as exports,
imports, tourism and real estate as supporting instruments not
qualities to be relied on as a foundation.
In BC, several popular
slogans have developed that
reflect the desire for self-reliance and nation-building in a
sustainable way such as, "Refine it where you mine it," and "Saw it
where you log it." This sentiment can be developed into a mass movement
to bring the economy under the control of the actual producers
in harmony with the hereditary rights of First Nations and sensitive to
the needs of Mother Earth.
One thing is certain; this wrecking of manufacturing and
food security and putting all our eggs in the basket of raw resource
exports, tourism and real estate development is a dead end that does
not bode well. Let's discuss and organize for an alternative!

Aveos Workers Fight for their Livelihoods and Against
Dismantling of Aircraft Maintenance Sector
- Pierre Chénier -
Aveos workers and their
supporters protest the company's mass layoffs, Vancouver, March 19,
2012.
For more than three months now the Aveos workers
have been fighting non-stop in defence of their livelihoods and against
the dismantling of the aircraft maintenance sector in Canada in which
Aveos was a major player. Without warning, on March 18, Aveos closed
its facilities
across Canada, permanently laying off its 2,600 workers. On March 19,
it filed for and was
granted
bankruptcy protection under the Companies'
Creditors
Arrangement
Act (CCAA). On
March 20, the court overseeing the bankruptcy protection granted the
order to begin the sale of all Aveos assets.
The Aveos workers held many actions against such
wrecking. The targets of their protests were Air Canada, Aveos
and the Harper government for their refusal to take responsibility for
what is happening.
Air Canada and Aveos blame each
other for the shutdown of Aveos. Air Canada washed
its hands of Aveos, claiming it is an independent company and a mere
subcontractor doing some of its maintenance work. It blames the closure
on bad management by Aveos executives. It persists in claiming
that Aveos is an independent company even though it was part of Air
Canada until it was sold in 2007
and even though the Aveos workers were considered Air Canada workers
until late
in 2011 -- their pension fund was part of the Air Canada Pension Funds
until July 2011 and is still held in trust by Air Canada. As
well,
the maintenance and overhaul centres where airframes were repaired
are still owned by Air Canada. There are many other examples that show
that the link between Air
Canada and Aveos was never
broken. In fact, right up until the shutdown, it is estimated that
85 per cent of Air Canada's heavy maintenance was being done by
Aveos. For its part, Aveos blames Air Canada for its alleged financial
troubles because the carrier was sending more and more of its
maintenance work elsewhere.

Airline workers
participate in Ontario Day of Action Against Cuts, April 21, 2012.
|
But workers' anger is primarily directed at the
arrogance and aloofness the Harper government has shown towards their
livelihoods, rights and the fate of this industrial sector
in Canada. A comment made by federal
Minister of Transport Denis Lebel on June
14 in the House of Commons typifies this arrogant detachment from the
real world. Answering an Opposition MP's question on
what the government intends to do to defend the workers and the sector,
Minister Lebel answered:
"As we have been saying since the beginning, this is an
issue between private companies. Air Canada has 2,500 maintenance
workers, it owns its whole maintenance team, of course they have their
contracts with other companies to do the
maintenance that is somehow more heavy duty.
We are going to keep on making sure that the law is upheld, that our
workers continue to have jobs. This is a matter between private
companies
and we are hearing that there are buyers coming forward for the former
employees of Aveos."
Minister Lebel deliberately
twists the truth. Besides the fraud that it is merely a private matter
when livelihoods and an industrial
sector are at stake, he gives false the impression that everything is
fine and legal because maintenance activities carry on. But
these are not the same workers he is talking about and they are not
doing the same work. The 2,500 maintenance workers Minister Lebel
refers to are the workers who are doing the on-site maintenance work
of Air Canada -- the routine maintenance that is done between flights.
The 2,600 workers who did the maintenance at Aveos are gone,
terminated. Aveos was responsible for Air
Canada's heavy maintenance -- different from the on-site maintenance --
which means airframes, engines and
components like landing gears. This work was done in maintenance and
overhaul centres that have now
been closed. The fact that Air Canada has this maintenance work
done by a different workforce does not replace what has been lost in
terms of those workers' experience and their livelihoods.
As for as the law to which Minister Lebel refers, this
is the Air Canada Public
Participation Act
adopted by the Mulroney government in 1998 after Air Canada
was privatized. Again Minister Lebel is twisting the truth when he says
that his government is going to make sure the
law is upheld. The workers claim that Air Canada is
violating the law and even the Quebec government has taken Air Canada
to Court to demand a ruling that Air Canada is violating the
law in closing the overhaul centre in Montreal.
The law says that as part
of its obligations, the
privatized Air Canada must "maintain operational and overhaul centres
in
the City of Winnipeg, the Montreal Urban Community and the City of
Mississauga." Is this the same as maintaining the on-site maintenance
activities to which Minister Lebel refers?
Minister Lebel seems oblivious to the fact that the
workers are challenging Air Canada and his government on this matter
and so are the Quebec government, while many experts have been quoted
in the press saying that "operational and overhaul centres" cited in
the law are precisely the Aveos
facilities that have been shut down.
Minister Lebel also twists the truth in his comments
that he has heard that there are buyers for the
Aveos facilities who would potentially give Aveos workers their jobs
back. In June, within
the deadline set by the bankruptcy court, no buyer came forward for the
airframes maintenance part
of the company which was by far the largest segment of the operation
and the one with the highest number of workers. The divestiture process
for the components and engine maintenance parts of the operations is
not yet
completed and nothing has
been said by the court about any results.
Workers report that for a couple of months now
the officials of the Harper government have simply refused to talk to
them and do not even acknowledge receipt of the faxes and
emails they have sent to them.
Meanwhile the bankruptcy protection proceedings carry on
and the workers are deprived of what belongs to them. At the
beginning of April, the court overseeing the CCAA proceedings ordered
Aveos to pay about $6 million in unpaid pre-filing wages to the Aveos
workers plus about $450,000 in payroll
contributions. This payment was made at a time when workers had been
without
income since the closure, from either wages or Employment Insurance.
The payment was made under the hoax of providing immediate relief to
the workers who were
already facing personal bankruptcies and other hardships but the ruling
says that this amount is a payment
against the $2,000 of unpaid wages that are considered to be secured
under
CCAA. These unpaid secured wages are for vacation and overtime
pay. So the workers were paid their regular unpaid pre-filing payroll
cheques under the condition that if they accept this, they forego their
other
unpaid wages as secured payments
which means that these monies are now in limbo. According to a union
leader in Montreal of the International Association of Machinists and
Aerospace Workers, the union that represents the Aveos workers, roughly
500 Montreal workers have found new jobs since the
closure and more than 1,000 are still
unemployed.
The issue of pensions is
also a major concern. The union
was recently notified that the Aveos pension plan was being wound up.
The union reports that a major question that cannot be answered at this
time is the solvency funding ratio at the date of windup because no
actuarial valuation of the plan was
done prior to Aveos' insolvency filing. This, the union says, is
related
to the intricacy of the pension plans because until July 2011, the
pension plan of the Aveos workers was still part of the Air Canada
pension plans and the money is still with Air Canada because the
transition of the plan to Aveos has yet to be
approved by the Office of the Ministry of Finance that supervises all
federally regulated pension plans. That final approval and transfer of
money was expected to be done sometime in 2013.
The Aveos workers continue to hold actions,
talk to the media, demand justice for themselves and oppose
the dismantling of the aircraft maintenance sector of the airlines
industry in Canada.

Announcement
Notice to Our Readers
With this issue of TML Daily we inform our
readers that during July and August we will publish irregularly. This
will give us time to take necessary measures to improve our work. TML
Weekly
Information
Project will continue regular publication
during the summer.
We remind you to please continue sending in your
articles, comments, reports and photographs. It is also time to renew
your subscriptions and financial contributions to sustain this very
important work. Please send cheques or money orders made out to
Marxist-Leninist Party of Canada and mail to Box 666 Station C,
Montreal, QC H2L 4K4;
tax receipts will be issued for contributions over $20.[1]
Thanking you for your support throughout the year, we
wish you a very fruitful and safe summer.
Technical and Editorial Staff
TML Daily
June 29, 2012
1. The maximum contribution to
a registered political party is $1,200 per year. Monetary contributions
to registered political parties entitle the contributor to an income
tax credit as follows: 75 per cent of the first $400 to a maximum of
$300, 50 per cent of the next $350 for a maximum of $475 and 33.3 per
cent of any amount more than $750 up to $1,200 for a maximum tax credit
of $624.99.

Read The Marxist-Leninist
Daily
Website: www.cpcml.ca
Email: editor@cpcml.ca
|